Analyzing The Five Players Who Opted Out

As I mentioned in my opt-out feature article last week, five players have used an opt-out to secure a new contract or extension: Alex Rodriguez, J.D. Drew, A.J. Burnett, C.C. Sabathia, and Rafael Soriano. A-Rod and Sabathia stayed with the Yankees, with Sabathia getting a year added to his contract just before the point of opting out.  Drew, Burnett, and Soriano signed with new teams.

One negative often associated with opt-out clauses is that if a player has two or three good years, he'll just opt out and his former team will miss out.  But what if the five players above had not opted out?  Would their teams have come out ahead? 

For this exercise, we'll use FanGraphs' dollar valuations, which were explained here by Dave Cameron.  My definition of an opt-out clause is a provision where the player can become a free agent midway through a multiyear deal, at a point where he has multiple guaranteed years remaining.

  • Alex Rodriguez: Opted out of 2008-10 seasons, for which the Yankees would have paid him $72MM.  A-Rod produced 13.7 WAR during that time, which was worth $60.1MM.  He was a very good player from 2008-10, averaging about 4.6 WAR per year, but he didn't provide great value for the price.
  • J.D. Drew: Opted out of 2007-09 seasons, for which the Dodgers would have paid him $33MM.  Drew produced 10.5 WAR during that time, which was worth $46.8MM.  This opt out hurts in that regard, though the Dodgers paid $22MM for Drew's 6.8 WAR in 2005-06, which is valued at $24.2MM.  While it would have been excellent value to have Drew for the duration of his five-year, $55MM contract, the Dodgers didn't do poorly in getting the first two years.
  • A.J. Burnett: Opted out of 2009-10 seasons, for which the Blue Jays would have paid him $24MM.  He was worth 4.3 WAR during that time, valued at $19.2MM.  The Jays wound up paying $31MM for 10.7 WAR from 2006-08, which is valued at $45.2MM.  As former Blue Jays GM J.P. Ricciardi put it in our interview, "We put the opt-out in there and in all honesty, it ended up working out great for us."
  • C.C. Sabathia: Would have opted out of 2012-15 seasons, for which the Yankees owed him $92MM.  Sabathia's 7.3 WAR from 2012-13 was worth $34.3MM, and it's difficult to picture him producing $57.7MM worth of value for his age 33-34 seasons.  Had the Yankees allowed Sabathia to opt out and leave after 2011, they would have missed out on a strong 2012 season.  Still, the case can be made that they should have let him go after paying $69MM for 17.5 WAR from 2009-11, which is valued at $76.8MM. 
  • Rafael Soriano: Opted out of 2013 season, for which the Yankees owed him $14MM.  I'm not a big fan of using WAR to evaluate reliever salaries, but I am comfortable saying Soriano's 2013 season was nothing special and not worth his salary.  I should note that Soriano's post-2012 opt-out doesn't fit neatly into our definition of the clause — with one year left at that point, it resembled a player option, which is more common. 

Take a look at the following table, which shows each player's age in the season immediately following his opt-out:

Table3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Of the ten opt-out clauses in baseball history, only Tanaka could opt out and sign a new contract that begins on the right side of 30.  Even Kershaw could be mortal by his age 31 season.  With an average age of 31 after the opt out, it's not surprising that with four of the five opt-outs that have been employed, the team was better off losing the player and the back end of his original contract.


Full Story | 8 Comments | Categories: MLBTR Originals

Leave a Reply

8 Comments on "Analyzing The Five Players Who Opted Out"


Rally Weimaraner
1 year 6 months ago

Most of the analysis pieces on opt-out and contract trends have been great, I found this one kind of hard to follow. A chart of WAR/$ for the pre and post opt-out contracts might help. All in all still a good piece, thanks!

davengmusic
1 year 6 months ago

I really like the chart. It reminds me of the nutritional facts chart on groceries.

Amie
1 year 6 months ago

What about Aramis Ramirez, who was famous for his opt out clauses when he played with the Cubs?

1 year 6 months ago

Aramis’ contract doesn’t fit our definition of an opt-out clause, as outlined in this post.

Clayfield
1 year 6 months ago

What am I missing as to why Ramirez opting out after 2006 doesnt qualify? As far as I can tell he met the listed requirements(became a free agent with multiple guaranteed years remaining).

Amie
1 year 6 months ago

Thanks for your reply Tim, I wasn’t sure

PaganIdolCow
1 year 6 months ago

Thanks for posting that Dave Cameron blog. Is a win really worth that much? In nearly all cases, no. I was glad to read Cameron’s explanation about things because I’ve often thought about how WAR really fits into the economics of baseball. I think there is a point at which WAR valuations become funny money, and here I’m thinking about the current Mike Trout/Angels negotiations.

Some people think the Angels’ 6/150 offer is a ridiculously low sum of money because of the going rate for WAR (based on the idea that things will always cost more, not less, due to inflation), but I don’t think Mike Trout planned on making more money in a season than any player in the history of baseball not named Clayton Kershaw. $150 million over six seasons is huge money, especially with the cheaper arb years thrown in. Trout would easily make $30 million-plus a season in at least four of those years. Only one player (A-Rod) made $30 million in 2013.

The Original Drew
1 year 6 months ago

I don’t believe that CC ever opted out. The Yankees gave him that extension so that he would NOT opt out of his deal.