During tonight’s relief appearance against the Tigers, Mariners hurler Chris Flexen reached the innings threshold to vest an $8MM option for 2023. He’s officially under contract for next season.
Flexen initially signed with the Mariners over the 2020-21 offseason. Previously an up-and-down swingman with the Mets, the right-hander made the jump to South Korea in 2020. He spent a year with the Doosan Bears, working to a 3.01 ERA across 116 2/3 innings, before fielding major league interest that offseason. Flexen inked a two-year guarantee with a 2023 team option valued at $4MM.
The sides agreed to a vesting provision that would guarantee that option while doubling its price if Flexen hit either of two conditions: 150 innings pitched in 2022, or 300 combined innings between 2021-22. Last season, Flexen took 31 turns through the rotation and tossed 179 2/3 innings. That left him needing only 120 1/3 frames this year to hit the marker, and he surpassed that tonight. It has long been apparent Flexen would eventually hit the threshold, although he’d had to wait nearly two weeks between his most recent appearance on August 19 and tonight’s contest before recording the final out necessary to push it over the edge.
It’ll be a nice raise for Flexen, whose first two seasons in Seattle paid him an average of $2.375MM. That he’s now in line for easily the best payday of his career is a testament to his durability and typically solid work over his time in the Pacific Northwest. Flexen pitched to a 3.61 ERA last year, compensating for a modest 16.9% strikeout rate with stellar control and a decent 42.4% ground-ball percentage. He’d posted a 3.92 ERA over 21 turns through the rotation this season, putting up a nearly identical strikeout rate but seeing his walks and grounders each trend in the wrong direction. There’s nevertheless value in the stability Flexen brought taking the ball every fifth day, and his pitch-to-contact approach can be effective in a spacious home ballpark and in front of a Seattle defense that has been MLB’s 7th-best at turning balls in play into outs.
In the wake of their acquisition of Luis Castillo in a deadline blockbuster, the Mariners found themselves with a surplus in the rotation. Seattle already featured reigning AL Cy Young winner Robbie Ray and top young hurlers George Kirby and Logan Gilbert. The M’s decided to keep Marco Gonzales in the rotation’s fifth spot while kicking Flexen to the bullpen. He’s made just three appearances, all in low-leverage work, in three weeks since the move to relief.
Each of Castillo, Ray, Gilbert, Kirby and Gonzales will return next season, and Flexen’s bump to long relief suggests he’s sixth on the rotation depth chart. Clubs go through more than five starting pitchers every year, but one could argue an $8MM salary is pricy for a sixth starter/swingman. Given Flexen’s solid results as a starter, there should be interest in Flexen from other teams with less rotation depth than Seattle has, making him a speculative offseason trade candidate. If Seattle were to keep him around, his salary would add to a 2023 payroll that’s grown with the Castillo trade and signing of Julio Rodríguez to a massive extension. Still, the M’s should have a fair bit of flexibility to bolster the roster.
Including Flexen’s salary, the Mariners have a bit more than $85MM in guaranteed commitments for 2023, in the estimation of Jason Martinez of Roster Resource. Castillo headlines an arbitration class that also includes Paul Sewald, Diego Castillo and Ty France (among others), which is likely to push their in-house commitments above nine figures before determining whether they want to make a run at re-signing Mitch Haniger. That’s not far off the approximate $104MM Opening Day player payroll this season. The franchise has spent north of $150MM in years past, though, and it seems likely they’ll continue to push payroll forward. The recent rebuild is firmly in the past, and the M’s have a good chance to snap their two-decade playoff drought this October (although they’d only host a first round playoff game if they finish as the highest-seeded Wild Card). Seattle is currently a half-game back of the Rays for the American League’s top Wild Card position.
How to proceed with Flexen (and how to manage the payroll more broadly) is a decision for president of baseball operations Jerry Dipoto and his staff to make this winter. With the trade deadline in the rearview mirror this summer, there’s no question Flexen will finish out this season in Seattle. He’ll remain on hand as a multi-inning relief option for manager Scott Servais with the ability to bounce back into the rotation if one of the club’s top five starters gets injured.
NWMarinerHawk
Makes me wonder if he gets dealt this winter. We really won’t have room for him in the rotation next year especially if they begin the transition back for Brash. Emerson on his way up. Flex is an absolutely solid back of the rotation bulldog. Good pitcher.
Hackinator 53
Flipped for a middle infielder in the offseason
myaccount2
@Hackinator- Think they’ll want to go bigger than that. I don’t envision Flexen returning the type of impact they’ll want to add in the middle IF.
ayrbhoy
Okay! Lets just say your idea is indeed one of Dipoto’s options this offseason: fill a hole (middle INF) with surplus (back end SP.) What type of INF talent do you think he will bring back in return? A 2-3 WAR starter? A teams 10th-15th ranked prospect? I’m curious.
Personally I think it will take more than 1 year of Chris Flexen to bring the Mariners the type of Middle INF that they will want for that 2023 lineup. I’d be curious to hear what my fellow M’s fans think of Flexen’s trade value.
Personally I’d much rather keep him. We are extremely fortunate to have a healthy rotation this year. You cannot go into a new season thinking all 5 of your SP’s will have another injury free year.
3cardmonty
He could net a decent rental. The M’s got a year of Adam Frazier for next to nothing. Frazier hasn’t played all that well but he was projected as a 2 win player when the deal was made.
drfelix
I’d rather keep him too. He went 4 innings after Kirby last night albeit with 3 ERs but he saved the bullpen last night as we are coming down the stretch. We also have Boyd now that is a great SP, but who can also go long relief as a LHP. AND we have Brash who was a starter. We have 3 potential starters in 2023 to fill in in case of injury moving forward. Plus we have some great arms gonna be ready in 2023-2024. Seattle is sitting great for the future. Yeah we took a Farm hit after the Luis Castillo Trade but I have know doubt Dipoto will rebuild our Farm in 3 years to get back to the top #1-3.
I don’t have any problem running with this same exact team in 2023, but if Dipoto wants to blow MLB away he can pony up and sign Judge…because we have the payroll room to do that move.
Don’t rule out Seattle grabbing Trea Turner for 2B and maybe moving on from Frazier, but I like the thought of Judge in RF, and leaving the rest of the team in tact.
drfelix
Oh and one more thing….with our current roster Dipoto doesn’t need to do anymore trades for the next 3-4 years. I’m sure he will, but they won’t be the trades that moves our top prospects. We have the youngest team in MLB, and have so much team control on our young players that the next 6-7 years I see Seattle becoming the next Houston. Houston’s run is about done, and Seattle is structured to take the West. If Dipoto now restocks the Farm, like he’s done for the past 4 years, we will have an amazing 10+ year run!!!
Chester Copperpot
Dipoto restocked the farm by trading away mlb talent and lots of losing for higher draft picks. I wouldn’t expect the same in the next few years.
jimmyz
Absolutely no reason to deal him in my opinion. Too many reasons to keep him with potential injuries from starters, managing workloads for the younger guys and perhaps most important is to keep extra arms on hand to maintain a solid bullpen in case someone struggles. Flexen isn’t a world beater but 7 million isn’t an overpay either and if anything is still less than what he’d make on the open market. This year’s M’s are in the position they are to possible break their playoff drought largely because of three or four position players and the entire pitching staff. No need to weaken your biggest strength to marginally upgrade a weakness.
Curly Was The Smart Stooge
How does Trigger feel about this? The horse is always the last one to know…
Cosmo2
Pitching depth is illusory. Someone is bound to get injured. I’d hang on to him.
JackStrawb
@NWMarinerHawk Well, you don’t look for 5 starting pitchers, you look for pitchers who can combine to start 162 games, and Flexen should be in the middle of that mix for the M’s.
He’s also a mid-rotation pitcher, with an ERA of 3.73 over the last 2 seasons, with an ERA+ of 106.
Fans have odd notions of what constitutes ‘back of the rotation.’ Durable? Better than average? That’s not ‘back of the rotation,’ and Flexen is both.
NWMarinerHawk
I am 100% ok with your argument. I love Flex. He was our most consistent starter last year by far. Ultimately, I just don’t think he’s a fit with the M’s long term
TheGr8One
Keep him and pay him the 8. Not many people have a legitimate back end starter sitting in the bullpen. Take it as an insurance policy on your starting 5.
solaris602
Completely agree. He’s worth that salary even as their spot starter/long man. You sacrifice nothing if one of your SPs goes in the IL. Are we to the point where we’re paying our 6th rotation piece $8M a year. Yeah, when it’s for one year, and the guy in question is a performer.
JackStrawb
@TheGr8One Again, not a ‘back end starter.’ Above average in 2021-22, since he returned from Korea after getting away from the Mets, w an ERA+ of 106, durable, as well… maybe on the Dodgers that’s back of the rotation, but it’s also #1 on several teams.
On a putative contender like the Mariners that’s a #4, maybe, but you wouldn’t care if he slotted in 3rd at the start of 2023.
hoof hearted
A Sports commentator said “every team needs a Flexen” on their staff
Poormans Orel Hershiser. Gritty. Grinds away..
Larry Bernandez 1324IM
Kid is a bulldog. You know what type of effort you’re going to get each time he is out there. Congrats
Rsox
Flexen is controllable thru the 2026 season through arbitration so i would hope they don’t just “flip him”. He or Gonzales should be able to bring back a decent return
3cardmonty
He’s not controllable through arbitration. He signed a 2-year deal coming off his KBO year with an option for a 3rd year that just vested. As the article says.
birdmansns
Actually rsox might be right. Spotrac has him listed for 3 arb years. He has almost no service time from the mets so he never went thru his rookie arb years.
Rsox
Baseball reference says he is arb eligible through the ’26 season
3cardmonty
My apologies, it seems you are correct. The contract buys out his pre-arb years but then he indeed enters arbitration after its conclusion. I agree this definitely changes the calculus on a trade and moves the needle in favor of keeping him.
ayrbhoy
That’s incorrect – while there are quite a few players on the current Seattle roster who are Arb-Eligible thru the 2026 season Chris Flexen is def NOT one of them.
He can’t possibly be Arb eligible thru 2026 since he was originally drafted in (2012) then developed by the NY Mets. Flexen made his MLB debut for NY 5 years ago in 2017. He sporadically pitched in their BP and Rotation from 2017-2019.
Chris Flexen left MLB after that 2019 season to ‘resurrect’ his career in the KBO League- he changed his diet, worked hard, dropped a ton of weight, then ‘flipped’ his success in Korea into a 2 yr contract w Seattle for the 2021 and 2022 season with an option for a 3rd in 2023.
That 2/3 yr contract was a really smart bit of business for the Mariners. It’s also validation for all the hard work Chris Flexen put into turning his career around. Not too many MLB pitchers who go halfway across the world to play in the KBO ever make it back into the Major Leagues. It’s really a very cool story and a good lesson for many people to be creative and open to new opportunity’s and more importantly to never give up on your dreams.
ayrbhoy
3cardmonty- you’d think that 1 year of a reliable back end SP who frequently goes 6 inn and keeps your team in just about every contest would net a good rental, wouldn’t you?
Re: your example of Frazier, tbh I would not be unhappy if they signed Frazier to play 2B for the next 2 years. He had such a terrible start to his M’s career, in fact, he is having one of his worst seasons ever. Despite that he will finish this year at least a 2 WAR player, he plays at least 2 positions AND he wouldn’t “cost a ton.”
Speaking of getting Frazier for “next to nothing”- I wonder how FO’s weigh the value of one year of a back end SP compared to the 5-6 years of control of the two prospects we sent? I bet it’s different from our interpretation of value! We’ve seen the value of young cost controlled players rise over the last couple of decades. The game is different now, look how many established veterans couldn’t get contracts over the last few yrs.
birdmansns
@ayr imagine writing all that and being wrong? You cant be a free agent til you have 6 years of service time. Despite his cups of coffee with the mets he came into this season with less than 2 years of service time. He would qualify for super 2 but he has agree to buy out his 3 years of service time with the mariners, which has no impact on service time. It ended up to buying 2 pre arb years and probably what would of been a super 2 arb year. So he still has 2024, 2025 and 2026 as arb years, expected to reach 6 year service time in 2027 for his first year as a free agent. The mariners signed him because he was a minor league free agent, the mets released him as a favor to pursue opportunities in asia. Still doesnt change his service time. He is not international born, so his age has no impact on his service time. (International players older than 25 with x amount of professional games forgo rookie contracts) .
The 3 years with the mets, he barely amassed half a season of service time and they burned all 3 option years, making him waiver eligible (probably why they agreed to release him because they would of lost him on waivers anyway)
Spotrac and bref pull their contract info from the mlb database and are rarely wrong.
ayrbhoy
I love baseball, A LOT but can you tell I was born in the British Isles? haha- thanks Birdman you learn a new thing every day!
The rules and bi-laws of baseball can be confusing when the League and the players get to negotiate and shape the details of the rules every 5-10 yrs!!
Chester Copperpot
Ooooh, I’ll trade you Marco right now.
DynamiteAdams
Pricy for long reliever yes but he’s a great insurance policy if any starter gets injured plus if their truly isn’t room for him I have confidence the mariners can flip him for a more useful piece.
A-A-Ron
Trade Marco, keep Flexen. Works better with the possible 2023 readiness of likely Emerson Hancock and maybe Dollard and Miller as fine #6 7 8 options
metslvt17
He’s a little expensive, but Gilbert and Kirby’s cheap contracts should help swallow that cost. He is a grade A insurance policy and definately worth more over the course of a season than any middle infielder he can return in a trade
marinerfan
As much as I think Marco should be used as trade bait, I can’t see the FO trading him. The hit in the clubhouse would be huge due to his popularity. Jerry learned a lesson after the Graveman debacle.
Endersgame
Taking into account their workload from last year compared to this year, is anyone else surprised that Chris Flexen is in the bullpen instead of George Kirby? I was absolutely convinced they would move Kirby to the bullpen to try to limit his innings and the wear and tear on his arm.
Very happy with the results thus far, just very surprised.
JackStrawb
Always sourly amusing to see the Alderson Mets having dumped off yet another good quality major leaguer for nothing.
How is the buffoon still with the Mets–or with any team, for that matter?
crazybaseballgal
I like Flexen.