![]() |
|
|
| |
« Roberts Deal Trailing Bedard Trade? | Main | Odds and Ends: Colon, Koskie, Atkins »
UPDATE, 1-27-08 at 11:29pm: Geoff Baker checks in again. He notes MacPhail's careful choice of words and reiterates that a deal appears close. He seems to think only a Peter Angelos objection could kill it, but would consider that a crazy thing for him to do.
UPDATE, 1-27-08 at 10:55pm: Jason Churchill, referencing three sources, believes this to be 99% done. He is hearing Jones, Tillman, Sherrill, Tony Butler, and Kameron Mickolio to the O's. He's not sure whether Bedard extension talks are a factor but you have to think that might be holding it up. He's also unsure on whether the O's would include anyone else with Bedard.
UPDATE, 1-27-08 at 10:25pm: Jon Heyman of SI.com says "there is still some internal debate in Baltimore over the deal." Heyman's heard that Jones, Tillman, and Sherrill are possibilities but the Ms may keep Jeff Clement. Heyman then goes on to add that the O's might send Brian Roberts to the Cubs for Sean Gallagher and Felix Pie if they finish the Bedard deal.
UPDATE, 1-27-08 at 9:32pm: No deal, says Andy MacPhail. He denies that Jones is headed to Baltimore for a physical. This Baltimore Sun link also has quotes from Jones, which kind of started the whole thing. Someone must've said something to him.
UPDATE, 1-27-08 at 8:45pm: A high-ranking Orioles official told the Baltimore Sun that a trade has not been completed. Meanwhile MLB.com's Jim Street believes the Ms will send Jones, Sherrill, Chris Tillman, and a minor leaguer for Bedard.
FROM 1-27-08 at 7:49pm:
According to Geoff Baker of the Seattle Times, Adam Jones is headed to Baltimore in an Erik Bedard trade. Jones was pulled from the Lara Cardinals' lineup today in Venezuela. Cardinals manager Luis Sojo confirmed Jones went to Baltimore for a physical.
Baker got in touch with reliever George Sherrill, who has not been informed of any involvement in a trade. When we hear about the other players involved we'll post it here.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e2010534c7716e970c
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Bedard Traded To Mariners?:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
YES...That's what I'm talkin' bout!!!
Next on Seattle's list is Jason Bay in RF!
Bavasi just saved his job beyond 2008.
Posted by: DRWheelock | January 27, 2008 at 06:39 PM
Who else could the Orioles be getting here? Mike Morse? It can't be a one-for-one.
Posted by: HeyBlueJay | January 27, 2008 at 06:42 PM
This trade ROCKS!
The AL West was looking sooooo boring. Now we get to see Felix/Bedard go after the power house Angels.....good times!
Posted by: bsox21 | January 27, 2008 at 06:43 PM
Awesome! Finally a big trade!! Santana is NEXT!!!
Posted by: 04Forever | January 27, 2008 at 06:43 PM
thank goodness. i hope the saga is finally over.
Posted by: integr96 | January 27, 2008 at 06:47 PM
Felix and Bedard are gona steam roll people.....anything in their path will be destroyed.
Posted by: bsox21 | January 27, 2008 at 06:48 PM
Doubt that the O's got Truinfel also.
Posted by: JD | January 27, 2008 at 06:49 PM
I think the M's should trade for Crisp now, would give them a great defense and push Ichiro back to right
Posted by: gogopalehose | January 27, 2008 at 06:50 PM
I hope Roberts to the Cubs is next!
Posted by: Joe | January 27, 2008 at 06:52 PM
Its going to be a really good battle for the AL west and for the AL wild card.
Posted by: Joe | January 27, 2008 at 06:54 PM
YES!!! haha now if the mutts don't get santana the division is for the phillies
Posted by: sjphilsfan | January 27, 2008 at 06:56 PM
This is great who are the other players? If it's a one for one the o's got fleeced I don't think thats the case though. Exciting stuff!
Posted by: joemorgan=#1 | January 27, 2008 at 06:56 PM
I wouldn't call this a done deal for Bedard yet. There has been no proof that he has been traded yet and while I agree Jones leaving his winter team is a sign that he may be traded it does not indicate for who or for what deal. But if this is the case then maybe we wil see a flury of trades this week.
Posted by: airassault101 | January 27, 2008 at 07:00 PM
The division is for the Phillies?
Good luck replacing Rowand's overachieving play with Geoff friggin Jenkins.
Can't wait to face Lidge in that bandbox.
The fact of the matter is the NL East is a three team race, and you can't really pick a favorite.
Hell, I'm a Mets fan, and I even refuse to call them the favorites.
Check your homerism at the door please.
Posted by: JerseyMetFan | January 27, 2008 at 07:01 PM
Finally, the dominoes are starting to drop. Next up: Santana, Roberts...Crede?
Posted by: gadamer | January 27, 2008 at 07:02 PM
Awesome trade for the mariners, definitely makes them the second best team in the AL West and a possible suitor of the wildcard. If they were also able to hold on to Balentin, Morrow, and Tunifil, it is an even bigger win for them. Adam Jones is very hard to give up, but the mariners needed the pitching to contend, and they have the money to possibly extend bedard.
And oh btw, SJPhilsFan, I do not think the phils are the favorites right now. The Braves have a pretty damn good offense and a staff that is better than the phils. Ill take my braves as the favorites.
Posted by: bravesbeast | January 27, 2008 at 07:02 PM
For what it's worth, one of the insiders over at Orioles Hangout is reporting that it's a four-for-one deal.
Like I said, for what it's worth.
Posted by: ChaosLex | January 27, 2008 at 07:02 PM
I gotta go the other way. I think this is a big win for Baltimore. They got Jones plus likely a few other very good prospects and have continued to rebuild.
The Mariners aren't exactly a playoff team with this move. They were OUTSCORED last year by 20 runs. IE they should have won 78 games or so last year, not 88. They still can't win the West, and it's doubtful they can really compete for the WildCard AND they mortgaged their future.
The Orioles have the makings of a pretty good team in a couple years if they can deal Roberts for a few guys too.
And this is a non-biased take. I have no affiliation with either team or either teams' rivals.
Posted by: djskilbr | January 27, 2008 at 07:10 PM
I couldn't see any less then 4 for 1.
Posted by: joemorgan=#1 | January 27, 2008 at 07:10 PM
oh, man. What I am hearing about who the Ms gave up is very interesting.
Posted by: basemonkey | January 27, 2008 at 07:11 PM
I think the O's got Adam Jones, George Sherrill, Chris Tillman, and Matt Tiuasosopo. If that is the trade, I think the O's won it. Still a good trade for the M's though. now they can seriously compete.
Posted by: Joe | January 27, 2008 at 07:13 PM
who did you hear?
Posted by: joemorgan=#1 | January 27, 2008 at 07:15 PM
I just don't see how the Mariners can "compete" if you look at last year. They were outscored by 20 runs last season. Again, that should have been a 78 win season if not for luck/random variance.
How does getting a 160 inning pitcher in Bedard and an average to below average pitcher in Silva, change that into a 90-92 win team? And it's going to take that big of a shift to be a playoff team, at least.
Posted by: djskilbr | January 27, 2008 at 07:18 PM
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22871543/
MSN is running the story now and has a quote by Jones.
Posted by: basemonkey | January 27, 2008 at 07:20 PM
I have heard that there is no George Sherrill in the deal. It's all basically top prospects. I'm trying to figure out who exactly though but as you can imagine, it's a lot (maybe 4 players), and rumors are flying all over the place right this minute.
Posted by: basemonkey | January 27, 2008 at 07:23 PM
Everyone at USS Mariner should be put on suicide watch.
Posted by: ArodSucksAtLife | January 27, 2008 at 07:24 PM
You are right djskilbr but if they get a good year from sexson and pickup an outfielder like bay they'll be right there. I think bedard really helps
hernanez-lackey
bedard-escobar
silva-weaver
washburn-Saunders
bautista-garland
Still give an advantage to LA but it's closer.
Posted by: joemorgan=#1 | January 27, 2008 at 07:25 PM
I think the mariners did what they did in order to be able to contend over the next few years while their lower level talent develops.
Posted by: bravesbeast | January 27, 2008 at 07:25 PM
Right this minute I am hearing a major haul for the Os:
OF Jones
SP Tillman
C Clement
??????
FOR
Bedard
Posted by: basemonkey | January 27, 2008 at 07:27 PM
Nice!!!
Posted by: joemorgan=#1 | January 27, 2008 at 07:30 PM
thanks b-monkey
I could see jones,tillman,clement and a b-level. If this is true I'm drooling right now.
Posted by: joemorgan=#1 | January 27, 2008 at 07:31 PM
I havent heard Clement at all, wheres that from?
Posted by: ArodSucksAtLife | January 27, 2008 at 07:36 PM
OK...
1.) What does this have to do with the NL East? Phillies and Braves fans, shut up (You rae both wrong anyway, Mets are the favorites)
2.) Basemonkey, "you are hearing" where are you getting this from
3.) Good deal for Seattle; they needed pitching to contend and they now have a very good pitching staff
Posted by: metzfan22 | January 27, 2008 at 07:40 PM
Totally unconfirmed. You won't be able to really trust a thing until the dust settles a bit.
Another thing now though is that Rosenthal is reporting the rumor too. So, with him, you'd think he'll take the time to confirm certain things. He hasn't gone beyond what has already been said, that is, Jones is involved and flying back to the US. The other players in question are still murky.
Posted by: basemonkey | January 27, 2008 at 07:43 PM
So now the O's need some pitching. Time for Hendry and the Cubs to again offer up Marshall, Gallagher, and Patterson for Roberts.
Posted by: Sqweeek | January 27, 2008 at 07:44 PM
I am glad its over with maybee the Cubs could get Robert now.
Posted by: juan | January 27, 2008 at 07:44 PM
Or if the O's are truely stupid: Marshall, Marquis, and Patterson for Roberts.
Posted by: Sqweeek | January 27, 2008 at 07:46 PM
well i have to say i am worried about the braves. but i am not worried at all about the mets
Posted by: sjphilsfan | January 27, 2008 at 07:46 PM
www.sciencefictionbaseball.com has an interview with Tim Dierkes.
Posted by: cmg186 | January 27, 2008 at 07:46 PM
joemorgan, you're right, but a LOT of things would have to go right for them to truly contend, like last year, which just isn't likely again for at team to be that lucky.
Also, to get Bay, who could they possibly give up? They don't have much left to deal. I just don't see it.
Posted by: djskilbr | January 27, 2008 at 07:47 PM
Mariners will sign Wilkerson now, I think.
Posted by: Tim Dierkes | January 27, 2008 at 07:52 PM
I think if they offered up morrow and balentin for bay thats a good start point.I don't think the m's would do this but it is a possiblity.Would you?
My hope for the orioles is roberts for galager,marshall,and cedeno.After these deals the orioles will be okay in 2010 after all these terrible contracts are gone.
Posted by: joemorgan=#1 | January 27, 2008 at 07:53 PM
Yeah tim wilkerson sounds right but if they really want to be in play this year thy need something bigger then that.
Posted by: joemorgan=#1 | January 27, 2008 at 07:54 PM
These means that the Os have added:
CF Adam Jones
SP Chris Tillman (unconfirmed)
C Clement (unconfirmed)
?? ?????????? (unconfirmed)
SP Troy Patton
OF Luke Scott
SP Matt Albers
RP Dennis Sarfate
3B Michael Costanzo
FOR
SP Erik Bedard
SS Miguel Tejada
And, it looks like a Roberts trade is imminent as well. You just can't see the Orioles keeping Roberts at this point if the rebuilding is on in full force. Hill is out of play without Bedard but all of a sudden, you're not even sure if the Os have the roster slots to add Pie even if they wanted to (not assuming that he'd be part of the trade). Seeing that I think you might have to assume that the Os trade of Roberts will see some pitchers coming back.
Posted by: basemonkey | January 27, 2008 at 07:56 PM
Get it done MacPhail. Orioles would have no need for Pie now because they have all outfield spots filled. Don't forget Jay Payton is under contract.
Posted by: baseball354 | January 27, 2008 at 07:58 PM
How are you not worried about the Mets, you idiot? They had a 7 game lead with 17 to go, and they had an historic collapse stop them, but this is the same team that led the division the entire year...and dont forget they are getting Santana...Lidge is terrible, especially in Philly's ballpark, he is gunna be destroyed, and the Philly rotation is probably worse than the Mets (Pedro, Maine, Perez, El Duque, Pelfrey) AND thats without Santana..the Phillies rotationis Hamels, Myers, Moyer (lol) Kendrick (haha) and Eaton (not even worth a laugh) and thats just the pitching staffs...the Phillies have a below average outfield with Burrell, Victorino, and Jenkins/Werth, and a huge hole at third base..the Mets have a much better outfield/third base situation with Beltran, Alou, Church, and Wright (good luck trying to match that) and the Mets have a better bullpen (Wagner, Heilman, Sanchez, Feliciano, Wise, Smith, Burgos, and Sosa) vs. (Lidge, Gordon, etc.)..and again, phillies fans, this is before Santana is traded to the Mets, and possibly Livan Hernandez to eat up 225 innings and let Pelfrey be another reliable reliever...good luck phils
Posted by: metzfan22 | January 27, 2008 at 07:58 PM
Just curious, but why would the O's want Clement in the deal? They already have Wieters.....don't they?
Posted by: Sqweeek | January 27, 2008 at 07:59 PM
If the Orioles have half a brain they will trade roberts. As a current orioles fan I'm not concerned if that will happen. I'm concerned about guys like payton,huff,millar and hernandez. These guys might have a little value to someone who will contend next year so I'm hopeing we can get something going here.
Posted by: joemorgan=#1 | January 27, 2008 at 08:00 PM
Clement is convertable to a corner position, like first base. They have very little power in the minors for this spot, and Kevin Millar is not a long-term option obviously.
Posted by: Mr. JavaScript | January 27, 2008 at 08:00 PM
Ya, Pie doesn't really add anything to the O's at this point. He's much less of a talent than both Markakis and Jones. O's are really building. Good job by McPhail.
joemorgan, no I wouldn't give up those guys for Bay because then you're still in the "maybe" contender section and you have ZERO future. Just doesn't make sense.
Tim, I agree with you on Wilkerson. I'd guess he's next.
Posted by: djskilbr | January 27, 2008 at 08:01 PM
dude who the hell hacked my account
Posted by: sjphilsfan | January 27, 2008 at 08:01 PM
Sqweeek, I think wieters isn't a guarantee and clement could move to first base if needed. It's also nice to have as many good prospects as possible.
Posted by: joemorgan=#1 | January 27, 2008 at 08:02 PM
hahaha just wait and see met fans it will be braves verse the phillies most of the year
Posted by: sjphilsfan | January 27, 2008 at 08:03 PM
"Clement is convertable to a corner position, like first base."
Maybe, but from everything I've read about Clement isn't he suppose to be good defensively behind the plate? Seems odd that they would trade for him and convert him. My guess would be they would convert Wieters before doing that to Clement.
Posted by: Sqweeek | January 27, 2008 at 08:03 PM
There has been talk of Clement's availibility to move to 1B at some point. It's not as if his defense at C is what makes him a bonafide backstop C. Unfortunately the Orioles has had a gaping blackhole at 1B for the better part of this decade. That being said, it's not as if Wieters is ready to play today, afterall, he hasn't even played in a regular minor league season game once yet. So projecting him to fast-track will still mean a couple years. Irregardless of how it works out, it's not a bad problem to have if you have a quality stick at C/1B.
Posted by: basemonkey | January 27, 2008 at 08:05 PM
"Ya, Pie doesn't really add anything to the O's at this point. He's much less of a talent than both Markakis and Jones."
Sorry to say but I think Pie and Jones are pretty similar. I am not a fan of either and don't think either one will turn into anything special. Markakis is a stud though.
Posted by: Sqweeek | January 27, 2008 at 08:05 PM
The Mariners' rotation will be vastly improved next year with a lot less strain on the bullpen. Bedard and Silva instead of HoRam and Weaver? Gotta make the deal. Hopefully they got away without giving up Clement, though.
Posted by: Jarmstrong1422 | January 27, 2008 at 08:06 PM
weiters is going to be a stud but he is not ready yet, tho defensively he has the major league catching skills
i think clement might be able to start now and they could always use him to bring back something in a trade when weiters is ready
plus now they can move ramon hernandez before the deadline if he plays well and increases his value
for an organization that hasnt had a young catcher in a very long time having two is not a problem
Posted by: cw | January 27, 2008 at 08:08 PM
..an extra quality stick I meant. We might be back here in a few years talking about trading Clement. Who knows?
Posted by: basemonkey | January 27, 2008 at 08:08 PM
Don't discount Clement's value as a tradechip for Baltimore. It's the same principle as drafting the best available talent rather than drafting to positional needs. If you can get a potentially solid player at a position where talent is scarce, then you do it, stash him, and worry about spinning him later.
Posted by: DunkinDonuts | January 27, 2008 at 08:08 PM
i think that although wieters isnt a guarentee, he is almost as close as you can get to being an everyday player in the majors. not saying he will be but the kid can hit like none other. ive actually heard people project him to be in the majors by this september.
Posted by: Donny A | January 27, 2008 at 08:10 PM
Clement is vastly overrated when it comes to his offense, Wieters is a far better prospect though obviously not as MLB ready. Not that any of this matters as he hasnt been referenced in the Bedard trade by anyone other than basemonkey.
Posted by: ArodSucksAtLife | January 27, 2008 at 08:10 PM
Clement's defense is far below average at C. That was even noticeable at USC. He can easily be a 1b. But I wouldn't be surprised if he ends up a DH. His bat is very good though.
Great, great deal for the Orioles.
Posted by: djskilbr | January 27, 2008 at 08:10 PM
Bedard is a huge addition! The offense is going to be anemic though. Now they are thinking about Wilkerson? Yuck.
Great rotation (at huge cost) and a crap offense isn't going to cut it.
Posted by: thr33niL | January 27, 2008 at 08:14 PM
Huff to the Cubs with the Roberts deal - hmmmmm???
Another lefty in the lineup!
That would be awesome!!!
Posted by: GoTheDistance | January 27, 2008 at 08:18 PM
Looks like Hendry's got Macfail by the balls now. Give em Gallagher and Marquis for Roberts.
Make it happen!!!
Posted by: lobsterturtle | January 27, 2008 at 08:18 PM
"Looks like Hendry's got Macfail by the balls now. Give em Gallagher and Marquis for Roberts"
How exactly do you figure that? McFail said all along he wanted to deal Bedard FIRST and then worry about Roberts. It's not like he has to trade Roberts.
Posted by: Sqweeek | January 27, 2008 at 08:21 PM
"Looks like Hendry's got Macfail by the balls now. Give em Gallagher and Marquis for Roberts"
No, not Marquis. We want Rich Hill...
Posted by: Mr. JavaScript | January 27, 2008 at 08:23 PM
"No, not Marquis. We want Rich Hill..."
Zero chance now
Posted by: Sqweeek | January 27, 2008 at 08:25 PM
Yeah, with Bedard off the table, Hill is as well
Posted by: mikeks | January 27, 2008 at 08:27 PM
ACCORDING TO ROCH OF THE SUN, BEDARD HAS NOT BEEN TRADED YET.
http://weblogs.baltimoresun.com/sports/roch/blog/2008/01/no_longer_waiting.html
Posted by: basemonkey | January 27, 2008 at 08:32 PM
Cubs sorry guys we need at least gallagher and marshall. And really you might have to throw in cedeno. I would love to give you another guy and just eat his whole contract. Maybe huff or payton. Payton seems like a better matchup. At least you guys would get a decent backup in case pi blows.
Posted by: joemorgan=#1 | January 27, 2008 at 08:32 PM
Gallagher, Marshall, and Patterson was the original rumor for Roberts anyways. I'm all for it and if they throw in Huff.....great.
Posted by: Sqweeek | January 27, 2008 at 08:33 PM
Don't believe Roch. He's just pissed because the Baltimore Sun was scooped again.
Posted by: ChaosLex | January 27, 2008 at 08:35 PM
Hot off the Sun, McPhail denies any trade. Yet Jones is still flying into Baltimore tomorrow... strange offseason.
http://www.baltimoresun.com/sports/baseball/bal-os0127,0,5598077.story
Posted by: Mr. JavaScript | January 27, 2008 at 08:40 PM
Not sure what to think...but Roch saying so or not to me means quite a bit. He's one of those guys who has a direct line to MacPhail and can call him or anyone else in the Os org up. Not that Roch would have anymore leverage to get the absolute truth, but he does have access.
Not sure what to think anymore.
Posted by: basemonkey | January 27, 2008 at 08:40 PM
if roch is right, then why would jones say he is coming to baltimore tommorrow. im sure he is not coming just to get his hands on a high quality crabcake topped with old bay.
Posted by: Donny A | January 27, 2008 at 08:40 PM
Now we are back where we atarted. MacPhail has denied all the rumors.
http://www.baltimoresun.com/sports/baseball/bal-os0127,0,5598077.story
Posted by: basemonkey | January 27, 2008 at 08:41 PM
so far I can find nothing that says a trade has been completed. I think Tim should have ended the title with this????????
Posted by: airassault101 | January 27, 2008 at 08:46 PM
does anyone think that with the impending bedard trade that the angels, feeling threatened by the m's, make an offer for santana?
Posted by: tgetman | January 27, 2008 at 08:48 PM
of course the trade is not completed, all players involved have to pass physicals.
Posted by: minnesotawins | January 27, 2008 at 08:48 PM
Exactly. How are these stories in conflict at all? It just means physicals still have to be taken, which is consistent with the first reports, and Jones' comments.
Posted by: djskilbr | January 27, 2008 at 08:49 PM
Churchhill has been stating that Bavasi's final offer included:
Jones/Sherrill/Tillman + low level prospect
But it's not sounding like Sherrill is in the trade now?!
God I hope Bavasi kept Clement. I'm BIG on his power LHB in our lineup for cheap & club controlled for the next 6 years!
Clement could platoon in 2008 and beyond with Johjima and spend 25% of his time backing up Johjima...and the other 75% DHing for us. I'm totally expecting Bavasi to resign Johjima prior to 4/1/08, even "if" Clement wasn't traded. But more so "if" Clement is traded!
Posted by: DRWheelock | January 27, 2008 at 08:49 PM
"Now we are back where we atarted. MacPhail has denied all the rumors."
Of course, we all know that the cubs are going to get Bedard AND Roberts for 7 players who amount to a steaming pile of medicority...LMFAO!!!!
"Gallagher, Marshall, and Patterson was the original rumor for Roberts anyways"
Yes and that will get shot down as well. I think MacPhail has already let Hendry now..quality, not quantity. Anybody out here spoutting that Hendy has MacPhail by the balls should get a clue. Roberts is gonna cost at least one elite/difference maker propsect for this to get done. Any combination of Marshall, Cedeno, Gallagher, Patterson aint gonna cut it.
Posted by: forlife61 | January 27, 2008 at 08:50 PM
I swear if this one doesn't go down, I'm going to freak out. I can't take this messing with my emotions.
Tim, I love your site but you can't keep jacking with me.
Please, please make this deal happen. I don't even have a horse in this race, but we need some dominoes to fall.
Posted by: bweav44 | January 27, 2008 at 08:54 PM
Um, forlife61, you must have me mistaken for a Cubs fan.
Posted by: basemonkey | January 27, 2008 at 08:57 PM
Gallagher and marshall project between #3-5 starters and add cedeno I don't think roberts alone is more valuable then that.As an orioles fan I'm amped by that offer. I would also love, LOVE to throw in Huff. The quicker we can gt these guys out of here the better!
Posted by: joemorgan=#1 | January 27, 2008 at 08:59 PM
No base, I didnt. You actually make pretty intelligent, thought out remarks out here..so no I didnt think you were a cubs fan. I was just being sarcastic. I do expect this deal to go thru though. When it does I hope a certain fanbase sees how far off they were with their asinine proposals.
Posted by: forlife61 | January 27, 2008 at 09:02 PM
To all you Mariners fans who want Jason Bay--
We just traded Jones for Bedard (unofficially, but it's imminent). I'm all for trading Jones. But, I don't want to trade Balentien for Bay. That's not a good deal. We can sign Wilkerson for 1 year until Balentien is ready for the full-time duty. Balentien is what it would take for Bay, at minumum. Not going to happen.
Posted by: baseballismylyf4 | January 27, 2008 at 09:03 PM
but u have to realize that even though they project them to be there, they probaly wont. i see marshall as a decent releiver in the mlb and gallagher and cedeno will disappear in the next 3-5 years.
Posted by: Donny A | January 27, 2008 at 09:03 PM
I think it's interesting that MacPhail said Jones was not coming to Baltimore for a physical. Why the hell would Adam Jones lie to a reporter in Venezuela and tell them he was going to Baltimore for a physical and that he was the "centerpiece" of the Bedard deal? Seems weird. I guess MacPhail is just trying to cover his own ass in case someone doesn't pass a physical.
Posted by: JakeOD21 | January 27, 2008 at 09:08 PM
Congrats M's fans. Nice deal.
Muck the Fets!
Posted by: PhilsPhan | January 27, 2008 at 09:09 PM
I disagree donny. I think marshall would be a great #3 starter for us and gallagher would be awesome at #5. I think cedeno can be an average to slightly above average ss. Kind of like betancourt. With a higher ob and add 5-10 sb. That's a lot of value for roberts alone.
Posted by: joemorgan=#1 | January 27, 2008 at 09:09 PM
I've literally been smoking too much wacky tobacky. Should just shake out better for the Roberts trade on the Cubs side.
Posted by: lobsterturtle | January 27, 2008 at 09:11 PM
If sherrill is really in this deal hopefully we can flip him for something a little more desireable. Or maybe walker is out the door.
Posted by: joemorgan=#1 | January 27, 2008 at 09:12 PM
I'm always careful to talk about Cubs prospects here because it sets off such a chain reaction. All in all, when you see young pitchers who project to be #3-5 SPs, they generally end up being marginal players over the course of their careers. A big part of projection comes from evaluating basic fundamental things that just won't change much as they grow older, like velocity and stuff. A lot of the true #3 SPs of the league today were actually #1 projected guys who fell short for one reason or another. A lot of the #3-5 projected guys in baseball just 5 years ago are out of baseball completely.
Posted by: basemonkey | January 27, 2008 at 09:13 PM
They said the trade has not been 'completed' that usually means there needs to be some physicals taken. Its not done until then.
Posted by: XD23 | January 27, 2008 at 09:19 PM
I'm really making a statement on how crazy peoples idea of roberts value is. Even if two of those three become league average in their respectable psotions I feel it's worth it. I just don't see any team making a better offer then that and no one is going to give us a true impact prospect for him.
Posted by: joemorgan=#1 | January 27, 2008 at 09:21 PM
Yeah, but you guys aren't looking at Gallagher very closely if you think he will be a 5 at best. He has Adam Miller minor league numbers with a great ground ball ratio, and he is a horse. What is it about the guy you don't like? Seriously...he will probably be better than Marshall, and I don't dislike Marshall. Cedeno has mashed in AAA, which is why I am really hoping we give you Patterson instead. If there is a position of need for the Cubs, its SS. Cedeno may go out and win that job this year.
Posted by: Aduncaroo | January 27, 2008 at 09:22 PM
I think the best trade from the Cubs standpoint would be Marshall, Veal, and Patterson, but that would have to mean that no one else would beat that, and I don't know how true that is.
Posted by: Aduncaroo | January 27, 2008 at 09:23 PM