![]() |
|
|
| |
« Jays Close To Long-Term Deal With Rios? | Main | Odds And Ends: Lahey, Gibbons, Freel »
Baseball America's Jim Callis has the June '08 draft order, with supplemental and compensation picks accounted for. The Rays have another #1 pick - who's it going to be? Baseball Prospectus' Kevin Goldstein expects the Rays to pick corner infielder Pedro Alvarez, shortstop Tim Beckham, or starter Aaron Crow. Here's a scouting perspective on Crow, by the way.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e200e55180f7d28833
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference June Draft Order:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
I'm glad your following the June draft. No doubt in my mind it affects trade rumors, plus the draft and team's farm systems fascinate me.
I say that the Rays go after either Crow, Matusz, or Beckham. Just think of how many great young pitchers they'd have if they took one of the college arms: Kazmir, Shields, Price, McGee, Davis, Garza, Niemann, Hellickson, Morlan, Sonnastine, Mason.
Or if they took Beckham, the Georgia HS shortstop, then they'd be set at pretty much every position long term:
C- Dioner Navarro or John Jaha
1B- Carlos Pena
2B- Reid Brignac
3B- Evan Longoria
SS- Tim Beckham
LF- Carl Crawford
CF- Desmond Jennings
RF- B.J. Upton
Or they could very well take Alvarez and make him their long term first baseman and move Carlos Pena. This team has so many freaking options that even though they won't win much this year, I'm almost excited for this team even though I'm not fan. Actually ya know what, I'm endorsing the Rays as my new second favorite team in the majors, behind the Cubbies of course.
Posted by: scribbletone | March 29, 2008 at 10:03 AM
As a Cubs fan, I'm still baffled and amazed that we got an extra pick for the likes of Jason Kendall. Amazing.
Posted by: Aduncaroo | March 29, 2008 at 10:04 AM
Yeah I forgot that I was gonna say that. The 41st pick in the June draft for Kendall. I didn't like the Kendall trade at the time, but the fact that we got a good draft pick for him as well makes it all worth it.
Essentially Hendry traded Jerry Blevins for 3 months of Jason Kendall and the 41st pick in the draft, which will likely provide them a better prospect than Blevins was. Yippee.
Posted by: scribbletone | March 29, 2008 at 10:29 AM
Here's my first mock of the season....
There will be some surprises but there is some serious risers right now in the draft, and Pedro Alvarez's injury and projected price tag will make him drop for a lot of teams. But, it will make things interesting all the same....
1. Tampa Bay Rays: Tim Beckham SS
2. Pittsburgh Pirates: Brian Matusz LHP
3. Kansas City Royals: Aaron Crow RHP
4. Baltimore Orioles: Eric Hosmer 1b
5. San Francisco Giants: Justin Smoak 1b
6. Florida Marlins: Yonder Alonso 1b
7. Cincinnati Reds: Tanner Scheppers RHP
8. Chicago White Sox: Gerrit Cole RHP
9. Washington Nationals: Kyle Skipworth C
10. Houston Astros: Christian Friedrich LHP
11. Texas Rangers: Pedro Alvarez 3b
12. Oakland Athletics: Gordon Beckham SS
13. St. Louis Cardinals: Tim Melville RHP
14. Minnesota Twins: Derrick Saito LHP
15. Los Angeles Dodgers: Roger Kieschnick OF
16. Milwaukee Brewers: Buster Posey C
17. Toronto Blue Jays: Ike Davis 1b
18. New York Mets: Jemile Weeks 2b
19. Chicago Cubs: Josh Fields RHP
20. Seattle Mariners: Harold Martinez 3b
21. Detroit Tigers: Adrian Nieto C
22. New York Mets: Josh Romanski LHP/CF
23. San Diego Padres: Aaron Hicks CF
24. Philadelphia Phillies: Shooter Hunt RHP
25. Colorado Rockies: Isaac Galloway OF
26. Arizona Diamondbacks: Reese Havens SS
27. Minnesota Twins: Brandon Crawford SS
28. New York Yankees: Zach Putnam RHP
29. Cleveland Indians: Jordan Danks CF
30. Boston Red Sox: Cutter Dykstra 2b
Posted by: ozziethesaint | March 29, 2008 at 10:47 AM
i dont think the jays are going to take a 1b in the draft ...
Posted by: Larsen101 | March 29, 2008 at 11:00 AM
If Pedro Alvarez drops to 5, the Giants will take him. I think he goes 2 or 3..
Posted by: zito4cyyoung | March 29, 2008 at 12:08 PM
Zito, I've heard that the Giants are almost a lock for Smoak. They have scouted him extensively and love his bat
Posted by: ozziethesaint | March 29, 2008 at 12:21 PM
Yeah, they have been pretty high on Smoak. I think they may change their minds now because Angel Villalona is being prepped to play 1st instead of 3rd. He is getting the Prince Fielder type body style, so he won't be able to play 3rd. Alvarez seems like he will be big league ready soon.
Posted by: zito4cyyoung | March 29, 2008 at 12:45 PM
"Thanks for reading, Jason. I actually didn’t catch it on the first look, either." -- from the scouting perspective.
I'd just like to gloat in my nerdome and say that I noted the "funk" in Crow's delivery on the very first take.
If anyone's in need of a scout, I'm available. And cheap.
Thanks.
Posted by: lrs77 | March 29, 2008 at 12:54 PM
That's a pretty inaccurate list, Ozzie.
Posted by: gogopalehose | March 29, 2008 at 01:14 PM
I think that if Alvarez is there at #5, Giants take him, espically if there's any chance he can play 3B in the pros. Wouldn't be surprised to see him get a Major League contract in the $6-7m range.
Posted by: aGIANTfan | March 29, 2008 at 01:21 PM
Palehose, in reality, any mock is a crapshoot right now... its still about 3-5 weeks from things starting to settle themselves out.
Zito, according to a source I talked to, the Giants are still high on Smoak and were looking at him this past week
Posted by: ozziethesaint | March 29, 2008 at 01:32 PM
It's just that certain teams don't go for certain players, like the White Sox don't go for high school players, plus no 1st basemen will go before Smoak. And I'll eat my foot if Alvarez falls to 11.
Posted by: gogopalehose | March 29, 2008 at 01:42 PM
Palehose, Cole is one of the fastest risers right now among the pitchers and with the trades Kenny Williams has made I just dont see him passing on someone like Cole this season. and its almost a given that Hosmer is the first 1b off the board.
And right Alvarez and Harold Martinez are the 2 biggest droppers being discussed
Posted by: ozziethesaint | March 29, 2008 at 01:51 PM
Pedro will probably be taken first overall or in the top three, he's too good and teams won't care about a broken hand, a small injury. Smoak is almost certainly going to be the top first basemen off the board, there is no first basemen that fills the complete package like him. You won't find any lists that have Alvarez out of the top 3 or so, and have Hosmer before Smoak. You're really overrating the high school players in the draft.
Williams has never taken a high-school player 1st and won't start now. You're missing guys like Tyson Ross and you have too many catchers being taken in the first round. It's just not a very accurate list IMO.
Posted by: gogopalehose | March 29, 2008 at 02:57 PM
ozziethesaint, I think at this point you're really wasting your time. Trying to predict a mock draft of the June draft is so incredibly difficult. Its nothing like the NFL or NBA drafts where teams have obvious needs and they can immediately be filled in the draft, so you can generally corner their picks to their needs. But because so much projection goes into these draft picks, I think that really all your doing is wasting your time by even trying to guess who is gonna go where, especially a full projection of the first round.
Posted by: scribbletone | March 29, 2008 at 03:10 PM
I see the O's taking Pedro Alvarez 4th. They already have 3 outfielders and they have Wieters at C. If they sign Teixera to play 1st, and still have Roberts at 2nd, Alvarez would fill the 3rd base hole. They would need to fill SS and rotation. Any O's fans see them going out this winter and signing Teixera, Furcal, and C.C.? That would be a great winter (a la Cubs winter of 06) and it would truly make them a contender almost right away after starting a rebuild.
Posted by: integr96 | March 29, 2008 at 03:22 PM
The Orioles just used a first round pick two years ago on Billy Rowell though. I think that at this point it would be more logical for the Orioles to use that pick to get a good college pitcher, like Matsuz or Crow. They have a lot of good pitching and position prospects, but I would argue that the probability that the position guys work out is far better. They already have guys like Wieters, Markakis, Jones, Reimold, Snyder and Rowell. They have Loewen, Liz, Spoone, Tillman, Patton, Albers, etc. Aaron Crow would look mighty fine at the top of that list of pitchers.
"Any O's fans see them going out this winter and signing Teixera, Furcal, and C.C.?"
I'm not an O's fan, but I would be utterly shocked. Thats probably over $300M for those three guys, considering that Tex is gonna get a MASSIVE contract, and Sabathia should get one as well. Furcal will get a bunch on top of that. The Cubs were pretty close to being contenders when they spent all that money, and a lot of it was to retain two of their big stars in A-Ram and Zambrano.
It'd make more sense for the O's to spend a ton of money in the draft and get the best player possible every time, like they did last year with Wieters.
And no, the Orioles wouldn't be contenders. Not with the Yankees, Red Sox, Blue Jays and even the Rays all being legitimately good teams in that division. The Cubs are in a crappy division, so they were able to climb from the bottom to the top far more easily than Baltimore will.
Posted by: scribbletone | March 29, 2008 at 03:36 PM
The Orioles just used a first round pick two years ago on Billy Rowell though. Not sure they would want to draft another third baseman so quickly. I think that at this point it would be more logical for the Orioles to use that pick to get a good college pitcher, like Matsuz or Crow. They have a lot of good pitching and position prospects, but I would argue that the probability that the position guys work out is far better. They already have guys like Wieters, Markakis, Jones, Reimold, Snyder and Rowell. They have Loewen, Liz, Spoone, Tillman, Patton, Albers, etc. Aaron Crow would look mighty fine at the top of that list of pitchers.
"Any O's fans see them going out this winter and signing Teixera, Furcal, and C.C.?"
I'm not an O's fan, but I would be utterly shocked. Thats probably over $300M for those three guys, considering that Tex is gonna get a MASSIVE contract, and Sabathia should get one as well. Furcal will get a bunch on top of that. The Cubs were pretty close to being contenders when they spent all that money, and a lot of it was to retain two of their big stars in A-Ram and Zambrano.
It'd make more sense for the O's to spend a ton of money in the draft and get the best player possible every time, like they did last year with Wieters.
And no, the Orioles wouldn't be contenders. Not with the Yankees, Red Sox, Blue Jays and even the Rays all being legitimately good teams in that division. The Cubs are in a crappy division, so they were able to climb from the bottom to the top far more easily than Baltimore will.
Posted by: scribbletone | March 29, 2008 at 03:37 PM
sorry about that double post.
Posted by: scribbletone | March 29, 2008 at 03:37 PM
Love the fact that the Brewers have 6 picks in the first 63 picks...
Have 3 first rounders..3 second rounders...back to back picks in the 2nd round.
This is the First time draft god Jack Z gets extra picks in a draft and boy this is a HUGE draft for the Brewers because most of these guys will be coming up and hitting the bigs by the time Fielder and the rest start getting close to Free Agency.
Posted by: erbacaine | March 29, 2008 at 03:40 PM
Scribble-
Most teams like to go with Best possible player regardless of Postition.
Like the Brewers caught some heat because they drafted the Best College hitter in the draft and closest to being Major League ready..Matt Laporta.. but he is a firstbasemen...
Granted he has done pretty well in Left Field so far..but it gives the Brewers options with Prince now...
Some teams get into trouble when they dont sraft by best player and go with need...
I mean look at how many early picks teams like PIttsburg have had and still dont have a good farm system..and they dont trade prospects like the Whitesox do...
Tampa Bay is going to have a GREAT young team...I see good things from them this year and maybe even 2nd place next year when there Pitching comes up..Like Price and the rest..
Balt needs a lot of help..they dont really have any real middle INF prospects if I remember correctly...Pitching they have some young guys but nobody that really stands out as a potential Stud...They wont go with Catcher...thats the only thing off the table in my Opinion for them
Posted by: erbacaine | March 29, 2008 at 03:47 PM
intger-
It takes a GOOD draft pick out of college 2 years AT LEAST to get to the Majors..
Roberts wont be on that team when your prospect comes up...plus your OF of Jones and Markais...will be 2 more years into service time...so Nick would be a year from Free Agency...
Thats why you dont base things off of need..unless you have 2 guys rated the same..
In 2005 for the Brewers it was between Bruan and Tuttolwiski...West coast scouts wanted Troy...East Coast wanted Braun...
Jack Z went with Braun because we had JJ Hardy starting his first season at Short Stop
But they were close to still taking Troy but both were so closely rated they went with the 3rd basemen which we did not really have one at the time..
Posted by: erbacaine | March 29, 2008 at 03:54 PM
Well yeah of course, if two guys are equally thought of, and you have someone locked in at one position and nobody at the other, you obviously try to fill that hole. But nobody is gonna take a worse player because he doesnt fill a hole
Posted by: scribbletone | March 29, 2008 at 03:57 PM
"But nobody is gonna take a worse player because he doesnt fill a hole"
I meant nobody is gonna take a worse player because he fills a hole. You never know maybe that hole will be filled by then guys can come out of nowhere sometimes..
Posted by: scribbletone | March 29, 2008 at 03:58 PM
Palehose, if only 3 catchers go in the first round, I will be completely shocked.. Posey and Skipworth are locks. Skipworth is Joe Mauer with 15+ Hr potential and Posey is a steal for anyone, he wont be a huge power guy, but he will hit and for only catching for 2 seasons, he's one hell of a catch and throw guy already.
I realize the fact that Kenny Williams doesn't like HS kids, but Cole is a special talent and I think he has to take the risk to restock the system
Posted by: ozziethesaint | March 29, 2008 at 04:04 PM
i know that you draft for talent and not need. if the option is available, pedro alvarez has to be the pick. he has the talent to be the #4 overall pick. look at how far teixera fell in 2002 because of injury. it is easy to research that hand injuries will take about 2 years to heal. if you draft alvarez this year and have him follow the path of wieters, let him play in winter ball and that is all. '09 you have him play in AA and AAA and you can brig him up in '10. you dont think wieters will be up next year? I think he will definitely be up. If the 's were willing to overpay on a few FA they can contend fairly quickly (they may not win the division or will card right away, but they wouldn't be that far off). I know this is a difficult division, but imagine a 2010 linup of the following.
OF - Reimold $1.25M
OF - Jones $1.25M
OF - Markakis $4.5M
1B - Tex $20M
2B - Roberts $8.5M
SS - Furcal $8.5M
3B - Alvarez $.5M
C - Wieters $1.5M
The O's farm system is not that great so imagine how long it will take the O's to contend if they dont take advantage of the very deep FA class coming up this winter.
Posted by: integr96 | March 29, 2008 at 04:07 PM
integr96, so your plan to defeat three teams with dominant rotations by 2010.. is to outhit them?
The Rays will have Kazmir, Shields, Garza, Price and McGee. The Yanks will have Sabathia (he's signing there you know it I know it), Wang, Chamberlain, Hughes and Kennedy. The Red Sox will have Beckett, Matsuzaka, Buchholz, Lester and Masterson.
And your plan to beat these teams is to outhit and outspend them?
Right now, the Orioles need to realize that they have to stockpile top notch pitching prospects like the rest of the division has. It won't matter how good their lineup is if their rotation sucks balls.
Posted by: scribbletone | March 29, 2008 at 04:22 PM
scribbletone- what i am saying is that you dont play every game against great rotations. you are going to play 90 games against teams that may not have great rotations. if you go 55-35 against the rest of the league and lets say you only win 8 games each against the yanks, sox, rays, jays, thats 32-40. that puts you 87-75. if your outlook is that you need topnotch pitching without spending money on the FA market, you will chase your tail every year. Because when you finally have an ace your hitting will be down. when you finally have hitting your pitching will be down. if they can spend good money on this draft and get great talent and also spend money on the FA market they will shorten their rebuild calendar by a few years.
the O's are in a position the cubs were last year. you spend big on FA when you have a high draft pick. that way you rebuild your major league team and minor leagues without having to give up high first round drat picks.
Posted by: integr96 | March 29, 2008 at 04:37 PM
"the O's are in a position the cubs were last year."
Can I please emphasize that this is incredibly wrong. The Orioles have been a crap team for a decade. The Cubs were a good team for the three years before 2006, and 2006 was pretty unlucky. The Cubs need ed to fill a few holes and were playing against far worse competition. The Orioles are playing the most difficult division in baseball. If you think that 87 wins will get you the division then you're so wrong I don't even know what to say. I'm not saying you shouldn't spend money on free agents, I'm saying you should do it when your close to contending. The Orioles are not close to contending. They're quite far. Look at their pitching. This is not a team that is 3-4 pieces away from being a legit contender. Not against the Yanks, Red Sox and Rays.
What they need to do is concede that they won't win for a couple years, because they won't, and try to build up their yuong talent. Then when Markakis and Wieters and Jones start coming into their own, then go out and get the final pieces of the puzzle.
"you spend big on FA when you have a high draft pick."
This means that you should spend big money when your team sucks. Thats so wrong I don't even know what to say. When you suck you should keep the money and give the jobs to the kids. Then when they begin to mature you spend the big money to fill the holes.
I know that you don't play every game against good rotations. I'm saying that those teams will be playing every game with a good rotation and therefore will have great records. It has nothing to do with how Baltimore will fair against those teams, its the fact that they'll all be great teams with a ton of wins. You can't honestly think that the Orioles can buy their way into contention considering how goddamnshitty the team is right now.
Posted by: scribbletone | March 29, 2008 at 04:49 PM
scribbletone - there is one other thing i am glad you brought up. during the b. roberts trade rumors O's fans were willing to let him walk and take draft picks if they didnt get the prospects they wanted. but at the same time they said that only about 30% of top prospects ever pan out. so if the O's take the line of losing year in and year out and rely on high draft picks to come through the system and do something great, the odds of that are low. i would rather draft high a few times, and make a big splash on the FA market with guys you know can play at the big league level then hope and pray the players you draft make it to the big leagues and are the performers you hope they can be. How many players on the link below made a big impact for their teams so far. Lets face it, building through draft can be a crap shoot, especially when you have an over involved owner like angelos. http://www.thebaseballcube.com/draft/2002/Round-1-1.shtml
Posted by: integr96 | March 29, 2008 at 04:53 PM
scribbletone-you are right, you should spend the money on FA when you are close to contending. however, we dont know what the FA class of '10, '11, '12 will bring. so you have to strike when you know their is a deep FA class, and thats what '08 will be. and by the way, i never said they would get in the playoffs with 87 wins. what i said is that if they post 87 wins next year, 1 year into rebuilding, imagine what they can do when their prospects actually start to come up. because at that point they will have only brought up wieters, reimold, and if they were to draft him, alvarez. that takes no pitching they have or might draft into account. now if they were to have that offense for '10 and beyond, along with the pitching prospects they got from the astros and mariners, they could have an even better rotation then either one of us is giving them credit for.
Posted by: integr96 | March 29, 2008 at 05:02 PM
Thats quite a lot of if's. But then again the same can be said for rebuilding using all kids.
But to me, the biggest IF of all is whether or not Angelos would actually be willing to spend all that money in free agency after he wasn't willing to spend it on Bedard? If Angelos decided to try to win sooner and spend the money to do it, he would've decided to sign Bedard long term. Thats why I think that they won't be taking that direction.
Posted by: scribbletone | March 29, 2008 at 05:10 PM
I really, really doubt Alvarez falls to the O's. My prediction as of right now is that The Rays take Alvarez and groom him as their right fielder and that he'll break camp in 09 as such. Normally I wouldn't make such a prediction but he is extremely polished. The Pirates take Matusz to be their ace, and the Royals take Crow, convenient because he is a Missouri product. The O's will take either Smoak or Beckham if that takes place, my guess is Beckham. The Giants will almost certainly take a bat, and I think that it's likely that bat will end up being Smoak.
Posted by: gogopalehose | March 29, 2008 at 05:53 PM
The O's didn't sign Bedard because A)Bedard didn't want to and B) Andy Macphail wanted to rebuild. The O's have really done a good job taking the best players they thought were available in recent drafts, which took them a while to realize. They still have a long way to go, though.
Posted by: gogopalehose | March 29, 2008 at 05:55 PM
Palehose, Alvarez would never be able to be a RF. He's going to go to 1b or LF if he cant stick at 3b. TB will not take him because they have greater needs than Alvarez. Tim Beckham is an equally great talent and plays a position that is a premium.
Posted by: ozziethesaint | March 29, 2008 at 06:25 PM
The Rays are making a run in the next few years, and Alvarez certainly could play right field, even if he can't play it well. Somehow I doubt someone athletic to play SS in college can't play right, and if he can play left he's capable of playing right. Beckham would take several years to develop, and then you aren't 100% sure he can play SS in the majors when he fills out and his legs aren't as young. Alvarez is a much safer bet to become a perennial all-star and is being projected to go first overall. He has put up ridiculous numbers in one of the toughest college conferences in baseball. He is projected to go first or second by most draft pundits. The Rays already have a steady SS in Bartlett and a top SS prospect in Reid Brignac who reportedly handles the position well. They don't need Beckham, they need someone who can fill out the Rays line up as soon as they want to make a run for the division. They have long term spots filled everywhere but RF. Alvarez is a consensus top pick, unless the Rays want to go for a pitcher, but they are already stacked there.
Posted by: gogopalehose | March 29, 2008 at 06:38 PM
Reid Brignac actually projects to be more of a 2b. And as far as where other people project Alvarez, I could care less, I based mine off talking to people with inside knowledge
Posted by: ozziethesaint | March 29, 2008 at 09:18 PM
Oh and just because someone can play LF absolutely does not mean they can play RF too.
Posted by: ozziethesaint | March 29, 2008 at 09:18 PM
I'm gonna have to agree with ozziethesaint and say the Tim Beckham does make the most sense as the number one pick. I went over this once, but since I enjoy it, I'll go over it again:
C- Dioner Navarro or John Jaha
1B- Carlos Pena
2B- Reid Brignac
3B- Evan Longoria
SS- Tim Beckham
LF- Carl Crawford
CF- Desmond Jennings
RF- B.J. Upton
Rotation
Kazmir, Shields, Price, Garza, McGee
And if one of those guys doesn't pan out, theres always still Niemann, Wade Davis, Hellickson, Sonnastine, and Jackson.
Now yeah, Alvarez would look mighty fine at first, but the fact is that the Rays really don't need an outfielder. They have Upton and Crawford already, and another top prospect in Desmond Jennings, who should be up in '09. Then there's Fernando Perez, Jonny Gomes and Justin Ruggiano as well. The fact is that it makes more sense for the Rays to go after another pitcher, or a middle infielder. Considering all the pitching they have, it seems like Tim Beckham is a mighty fine fit.
Posted by: scribbletone | March 29, 2008 at 10:09 PM
Well, it's very possible that the Rays think differently than either of us, but lately they have been taking the best player available. especially the best college player available. If indeed they do take Beckham, the team would probably be a lot different by the time he got there. They recognize that they have a top shortstop prospect that by most account is very capable of playing short. If Alvarez hits anything like his off-the-charts college numbers, the Rays would find a spot for him. The Rays would have been plenty fine with pitching prospects even if they hadn't drafted Price, but they knew he was the best player in the draft. Same thing in 06- they actually had a deal worked out with Lincecum because they were hurting for pitching at the time, but they knew Longoria was the best player available. And since then Shields has developed into a #2, they've traded for Garza, and their high school arms have become very prospects. The bottom line is their style is to take the surest and best player and that happens to be Alvarez, unless Smoak eclipses him but I don't think that will happen.
Posted by: gogopalehose | March 29, 2008 at 10:37 PM
Smoak has ZERO chance of going number 1. Smoak isn't even the best 1b prospect in this draft. That's easily Hosmer
Posted by: ozziethesaint | March 29, 2008 at 10:58 PM
http://www.baseballprospectus.com/unfiltered/?p=695
I dare you to find me a mock draft, projection, anything that has Hosmer over Smoak. Please. I could go on with so many more people who like Smoak to go 1 or 2 and everyone has him over Hosmer.
Posted by: gogopalehose | March 29, 2008 at 11:17 PM
http://riveraveblues.com/2008/03/14/2008-draft-preview-update-1-2307/
http://forum.newsday.com/vmix_hosted_apps/forums/335/BaseballNewYorkMets/3554/2008_Mock_Draft.html?pid=16405#16405
http://www.projectprospect.com/top-15-first-basemen-under-25/
Just a bunch of people that think Smoak is better than Hosmer and some think he could go first overall. In fact, Yonder Alonso has a good chance to go before Hosmer too. Hosmer is the third best first basemen in the draft to many. High -school bats just don't go as high as guys who have proven themselves in college.
Posted by: gogopalehose | March 29, 2008 at 11:31 PM