![]() |
|
|
| |
« Rockies Could Trade Holliday | Main | Scheppers Injury Will Affect Draft Position »
Drayton McLane, the chairman and chief executive of the Astros, spoke with Roger Clemens recently and said that Clemens has not ruled out a possible return to playing baseball.
"We have a personal services contract with him and it's not activated until he tells us he's ready to retire," said McLane, just after this week's quarterly owners' meetings drew to a conclusion. "Well, he hasn't said that. I think if he was ready to retire, and that was clear, he would have already said that to us. But that has not happened."
McLane noted that the Astros would not rule out the possibility of resigning Clemens to pitch for the Astros, but emphasized that both the team and Clemens want to see all of his legal issues resolved before making a decision.
If the Astros are still within two games of the NL Central lead in July and Chris Sampson is still pitching to a 6.27 ERA, the name 'Roger Clemens' might be an easier sell to the fanbase.
Cork Gaines writes for Rays Index and can be reached here.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e200e55228caa38833
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Astros Will Not Rule Out Signing Clemens:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
Haha so despirate for a run at the play-offs the go to the liar! hahahahahahahaha! The atros need to re-build.
Posted by: AriGoldisaG | May 15, 2008 at 05:49 PM
Ari, if they signed Clemens it would simply be a ploy to put butts in the seats. Nobody in their right mind could think he can be productive. Everybody saw what happened last year with the Yankees and what a tremendous waste of money that turned out to be.
Posted by: fitz | May 15, 2008 at 06:18 PM
with the way the astros are playing, why wouldn't they want clemens back? he was ineffective in the AL east - big deal. he has always dominated the NLC
Posted by: MikeDub | May 15, 2008 at 06:30 PM
He done. Go head pay him some more money.
Posted by: Cubs World Champs please B4 I die | May 15, 2008 at 07:57 PM
The Astros need to rebuild? What do you think they did in the offseason? Tejada, Matsui, Bourne, Erstad, Chacon,Valverde, Geary, Brocail, Villarreal, and Blum. Not to mention that Pence and Towles are entering their first full season with the team. All these guys are all apart of the new rebuilt Astros.
The Astros are 1/2 a game back in the NLC. They have the 3rd best record in the National League and the 5th best in all of Major League. The Astros are rebuilt.
As to the actual topic at hand, Clemens would be a huge distraction to a club that is just now starting to gel together. I realize that the Astros are one or two starting pitchers away from being one of the more dominate teams in the NL and MLB, but I would rather see them look elsewhere for pitching.
I have no opinion on if the Rocket would do well back in the NL or not, I really do not care. He may do fine. I just do not want to see him mess with the team chemistry the team seems to have going.
Posted by: TexBulldog | May 15, 2008 at 08:51 PM
"The Astros need to rebuild? What do you think they did in the offseason? Tejada, Matsui, Bourne, Erstad, Chacon,Valverde, Geary, Brocail, Villarreal, and Blum."
Are you kidding me? Most of those guys are way over 30, and almost all of them are past their prime. They're a bunch of under-achieving vets (with the exception of Tejada who's on his way down).
Now Tex I'm not sure if you know the baseball definaition of rebuild but the usual concept is to restock the farm system, not tear it apart.
Posted by: AriGoldisaG | May 15, 2008 at 09:30 PM
Having Clemens around would probably free up Wandy or Chacon for a trade package.
Posted by: jatorres | May 15, 2008 at 09:43 PM
Tex,
While I applaud your enthusiasm, I don't think Ed Wade would agree that you're "rebuilt." He wants to win now and he's smart enough to know that they need more pitching.
Winning builds chemistry, if the Stros can deal with all of Miggy's baggage they can deal with their hometown prodigy. And while a lot of people want to act like he sucked last year, his signing just happened to coincide with NYs resurgence. And even though his ERA was up, 4.18 isn't really getting racked in the AL. If he can stay healthy, he automatically becomes the second best SP on the Stros.
Posted by: benjoua | May 15, 2008 at 10:04 PM
If Sampson is still pitching horribly we should just call up....oh....damn it.
Posted by: Laputian | May 15, 2008 at 10:18 PM
"If Sampson is still pitching horribly we should just call up....oh....damn it."
Hahhahahahahahahaha! my thought exactly. Tex I applaud your thoughts. But the uys you mentioned are vets and are around to try and keep up with the young brewers and stacked cubs.
Posted by: AriGoldisaG | May 15, 2008 at 10:47 PM
"The Astros need to rebuild? What do you think they did in the offseason? Tejada, Matsui, Bourne, Erstad, Chacon,Valverde, Geary, Brocail, Villarreal, and Blum."
...As Ari said, to rebuild is to get younger or build a foundation for the future. The Astros did make a ton of roster changes, but thats just retooling ~ and retooling with a ton of bit-players generally doesnt lead to much success. They are doing great, but longterm success will probably be difficult to sustain.
"Having Clemens around would probably free up Wandy or Chacon for a trade package"
...Keep Wandy, he's about to break out. Well, after he gets off the DL atleast...
And then, WTF are the Astros thinking on this one? Clemens? Really? What was the deciding factor, his off-season problems or the fact that he was Average at best last year when not hurt? If they wanted a starter that bad, they should hav gotten Colon or Weaver or one of the other leftovers ~ they all have as good a chance to help the club while not costing and arm and a leg or bringing the steroid baggage...
Posted by: darkstar1661 | May 15, 2008 at 11:11 PM
I think the obvious thing here that I haven't seen anyone mention is that McLane said the Astros would like to see all the legal problem cleared up before they would bring Roger back. Hence, Roger now has a reason to drop his suit againt McNamee other than just quiting. He can say he's dropping it in hopes of coming back to pitch this year and for no other reason (in other words, he's still "innocent"). Roger and McLane are friends, even if he doesn't pitch for the 'Stos this year McLane is trying to help him out, give him alternatives and plausible deniability, etc...
Posted by: pageian | May 16, 2008 at 08:27 AM
Clemens just needs to go away!!!
Posted by: JP | May 16, 2008 at 08:36 AM
Page:
That is very shrewd. It begs this question:
Is McLane willing to sacrifice the well-being of his baseball team to help out Roger? Unfortunately for all the Astros fans out there, I think the answer is yes. McLane seems to be willing to put his friendship with Roger over (1) the well-being of the team (he will NOT help them, whatever he offers in terms of improvement over Sampson, he will be a huge distraction) and (2) over the desire of his fans (I have a couple of good friends from Houston who loved Roger until this whole fiasco started and now they can't stand to even talk about him - they feel betrayed. I suspect this is the consensus feeling down there since most people tend to be reasonable and logical).
Posted by: skkrman7482 | May 16, 2008 at 08:36 AM
What an awful idea this would be. The success of the astros thus far has been a testament to the organizations ability to make changes for the sake of making changes. Usually this type of tinkering does not work, however it has so far for the Astros. Clemens is nothing but a distraction and there seem to be other options out there this year in terms of starting pitching. This type of move would do nothing but prove the organization's commitment to past-their-prime players who can't commit anything serious to the team. The days of Bagwell and Biggio are over, Clemens shouldn't even be considered.
Posted by: CubsFan84 | May 16, 2008 at 09:48 AM
The Astros definitely didn't rebuild last offseason, they are in total win-now mode. They probably have 3 decent arms in the minors that might be able to help this year - Nieve and Paulino (both recovering from injuries but should be healthy by the all-star break) and Norris (doing well at AA).
I think Clemens could still be very effective in the NLC. He was dominant 2 years ago and, as others have said, pitching in the ALE (facing a DH) is way different from pitching in the NLC. Just look what happened last time Clemens moved from NYC to Houston. He's a 6-inning starter, but he would be much more effective than Sampson, Backe and Chacon.
The big question is team chemistry. But for the most part, the Astros are a veteran team and I think the players would be fine. If the Astros do want to go this direction, I think it would be wise to talk to Berkman, Oswalt, Lee, and Tejada and at least gauge their opinions on the potential addition of Clemens.
Posted by: mymrbig | May 16, 2008 at 09:56 AM
The minute Clemens signed with NY, they should have:
1. Immediately terminated his personal services contract.
2. Released his son from the minors.
3. Publicly stated that he would not be welcomed back to the Astros.
We rolled out the red carpet for this child molester, and he didn;t even show an ounce of respect to his home team. He is a money hungry a$$hole who does not deserve to wear the Astros uniform.
I like our team the way it is, and even if we don't make the playoffs, at least we did it without Roger.
Our mistake was not signing his man crush Andy Pettite. He could have been the missing piece this year, esp in the NL.
Posted by: Astro Fan in NYC | May 16, 2008 at 10:48 AM
clemens is washed up now, he can't even pitch half a season anymore. i think signing him would be a bad move
on the topic of rebuilding the stros...why should they rebuild when they're playing so well r/n? like tex said, they're one of the hottest teams in the league, so what reason is there to dismantle the team just so they can get younger? they are a playoff contender right now. after a few solid drafts the farm system will be respectable again, just give them time. i'd rather see a decent time fight for the playoffs every year while rebuilding the system through the draft than a team of rookies we put together from dismantling the current group of veterans play terrible while rebuilding the system
and those of you who said most of those guys are past their primes are probably right...but if that's the kind of production we can get from old washed up ballplayers then i'll take them over any rookies anyday. you can argue that miguel tejada is the best shortstop in baseball right now not named hanley ramirez. check the stats folks, they're playing well.
Posted by: boomshwa12 | May 16, 2008 at 12:03 PM