![]() |
|
|
| |
« Schilling Blasts Manny | Main | Giants Leaning Toward Sabean For '09 »
THURSDAY: Bedard speaks! He pitched hurt for most of the season, apparently. Bedard said today he has a labrum tear and a cyst in his shoulder.
WEDNESDAY: Erik Bedard hasn't pitched since July, and he's elected to have exploratory surgery on his pitching shoulder. GM Lee Pelekoudas expects Bedard to be able to pitch next year, but admits it's an unknown until Dr. Yocum gets in there and pokes around. John Hickey says trading Bedard this winter is no longer an option, and the situation may increase the chance of a Jarrod Washburn trade. The Mariners would like to clear spots in the rotation for two young pitchers.
ESPN's Buster Olney tosses out an interesting idea: he thinks the Mariners should consider non-tendering Bedard. Bedard is arbitration-eligible, and should receive a raise on his current $7MM salary. If the Mariners were to truly treat the players dealt for Bedard as a sunk cost, they'd only ask themselves whether he is worth a one-year, $9-10MM contract. Depending on the results of the September 26th surgery, cutting Bedard might be the right move. The Mariners' new GM probably will not have ties to the Bill Bavasi acquisition.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e2010534b236e2970c
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Bedard A Non-Tender Candidate?:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
Really? Wow. After all the M's gave up for him, they are just going to non-tender him? Well, I could see him going to the Yankees or Mets.
Posted by: Chris | September 17, 2008 at 11:14 AM
"Well, I could see him going to the Yankees or Mets."
I recall hearing he was nasty with the media. I don't think it'd be a good experience for him if he did.
Posted by: icedrake523 | September 17, 2008 at 11:19 AM
So they'll cut off their nose to spite their face? The fact of the matter is they should just bite the bullet, keep him and realize he's still a good pitcher. Non-tender him and someone will offer him a good contract.
Posted by: start_wearing_purple | September 17, 2008 at 11:32 AM
I'm surprised he's doing the surgery now. If he's going for exploratory, it means they don't really know what to expect. If they find anything serious, it would make sense for the Mariners to non-tender him.
Posted by: yanksfan | September 17, 2008 at 11:52 AM
Wow, what a terrible trade it turned out to be. Although I still think Dan Haren trade was almost as bad if not worse
Posted by: viktor06 | September 17, 2008 at 11:53 AM
I would only do it if he has major shoulder problems. Shoulder problems are alot worse the elbow issues any more in my opinion, seems that pitchers come back with less velocity and it takes them awhile to get back to anything close to what they were prior. Let some other team rehab him if thats the case. Imagine that he would have to sign a two or three year deal to get any team to bite.
Posted by: schellis | September 17, 2008 at 12:04 PM
Shoulder problems are alot worse the elbow issues any more in my opinion, seems that pitchers come back with less velocity and it takes them awhile to get back to anything close to what they were **prior**
Prior and Elbow Problems in the same sentence? Nooooo...
Posted by: RockiesMagicNumber | September 17, 2008 at 12:58 PM
Oh the comments that used to come when Guru ruled this site. If he was here he'd probably tell us how good a trade this was. This has to be one of the biggest rip off moves of all time!
Posted by: joemorgan=#1 | September 17, 2008 at 01:47 PM
Wow, what a terrible trade it turned out to be. Although I still think Dan Haren trade was almost as bad if not worse
Care to explain? Seeing as how Haren has created a great 1-2 punch with Webb, I think Arizona is pretty happy. They gave up a ton of prospects, but it's not like they're getting burned like the M's
Posted by: Papelboner | September 17, 2008 at 02:12 PM
How can you even compare the Bedard and Haren trades? Bedard isn't pitching now. Haren behind Webb forms one of the best 1-2's in the NL, and Haren is 15-8 with an ERA in the low 3's.
I fail to see any connection other than both team gave up a number of good prospects - the resulting gains for the M's and Dbacks aren't even comparable.
Posted by: meph | September 17, 2008 at 02:37 PM
"Wow, what a terrible trade it turned out to be. Although I still think Dan Haren trade was almost as bad if not worse"
What the hell are you talking about? Haren is a legit Cy Young contender this year, and that is coming off a brutal stretch of starts. He has been awesome. Bedard has stunk.
Posted by: nrmax88 | September 17, 2008 at 03:20 PM
From August 4th to September 5th, Bedard gave up something like 71 baserunners and 29 runs in 42 innings. Don't know if that was the exact numbers, but it was something in that ballpark. Even after that stretch, he still has a 3.24/1.12 line. And better numbers then Brandon Webb pretty much across the board. What is too complain about?
Posted by: nrmax88 | September 17, 2008 at 03:26 PM
nrmax88- I think you're talking about Haren in your post; Bedard didn't pitch in the time span of August 4th to September 5th.
Bedard has pitched well, but he has been hurt.
How is the Haren trade like the Bedard trade, except that the other team got a lot of top line prospects? Haren is one of the best starters in the game. Bedard's been hurt for most of the season. And, the Haren trade was more win-win, with the A's getting the prospect haul and the DBacks getting that push that, if their bats woke up, could get them into the playoffs.
Posted by: melonis rex | September 17, 2008 at 04:19 PM
Oh. Bedard will never be non-tendered as long as Lincoln and Armstrong are at the helm of the M's.
Posted by: melonis rex | September 17, 2008 at 04:19 PM
i hope this guy gets hurt somemore.he doesnt deserve to play with all tht cockiness in the locker room adn towards the media.
Posted by: kingfelix93 | September 17, 2008 at 05:46 PM
I remembering mentioning Bedard's attitude problems last January and being dismissed outright because a few Ms fans argued that Baltimore is a lesser city and hopelessly out of contention than Seattle. All I got was a description of how beautiful Seattle is and how sad Baltimore was.
I take no pleasure in seeing the Ms get this round of bad luck on them and I feel bad for Ms fans. Seriously. I just tried to forewarn Seattle fans that Bedard's temperment is not the usual type. I can't say what exactly goes on inside his noodle, but it's not the typical motives most competitive athletes have. I thought Bedard might get a tad more inviting in Seattle because winning can help smooth these things out. No one would have predicted that his attitude would have gotten worse and more aloof.
Just for the record, I don't think Bedard is cocky at all. I think he is just super suspicious of reporters and sees them as being exploitive. It comes off as being directed towards fans which isn't the case. But, some reporters, if they get personally offended, they tend to present him in a bad light and make him appear quite cocky.
Posted by: basemonkey | September 17, 2008 at 06:10 PM
It's just that in Baltimore the media had a silent understanding of cutting a wide berth around Bedard and allowing him do his thing. They wouldn't roll the tape of his facial expressions where he's shooting a smug look at a reporter who just asked him the same question several days in a row. I think he just gets tired of that part. But I do think he sincerely loves to pitch but I think he'll never be that player who can lead a team and speak for everyone. That's where the whispers of him being able to be the Ace (as far as temperment) came from, which spawned the whole desire to trade him when Baltimore did. Baltimore should have sent along a owners' manual along with Bedard.
Posted by: basemonkey | September 17, 2008 at 06:18 PM
I non-tendered I see Him signing with the Giants. He doesn't like the media? What better team then the Giants...nobody seems to like them, they quietly loose every year, there future seems to look VERY good. They'd have a dominant pitching staff. He could rehab with the Giants and be up in no time. I also think that C.C. will sign with the Giants, but not if they get Berdard. But wouldn't that be dominance...
1.Sabathia
2.Lincecum
3. Berdard
4. Cain
5. Zito
That would allow the Giants to trade for hitters. Hmmm, the Giants should do it.
Posted by: Joe505 | September 17, 2008 at 06:46 PM
Why wouldn't the Giants go with Sanchez?
If non-tendered the Indians will be major players. They were in talks for him before he went to Seattle. Plus the Tribe loves trying to catch lightning in a bottle with injured players.....
That being said, unless he needs rotator cuff surgery, I see him staying with the M's...
Posted by: Hermie13 | September 17, 2008 at 07:11 PM
This is stupid. Yanksfan is the only one that got the point that the surgery is exploratory not reconstructive.
Essentially, an exploratory surgery is when a surgeon creates a slit in the shoulder area and enters with a microscopic camera in order to determine if any internal tissues, muscles, tendons have been damaged. There is a likely chance the Doctors will find absolutely nothing wrong with Bedard's shoulder and all this speculation will be wasteful.
Think about it for a second; we are speculating on Buster Olney's speculation based on the Mariner's speculation that the Doctors could "possibly" find something wrong with Bedard's shoulder. That sure sounds like a lot of speculation to me.
Posted by: The Juice | September 17, 2008 at 09:37 PM
I believe the aforementioned Haren trade was referring to the package sent to St. Louis, when they acquired Mark Mulder Dec. 18, 2004. The one that sent Haren to ARZ this past offseason has provided obvious benefit to both OAK and ARZ.
Posted by: secret sauce | September 18, 2008 at 09:15 AM
"Care to explain? Seeing as how Haren has created a great 1-2 punch with Webb, I think Arizona is pretty happy. They gave up a ton of prospects, but it's not like they're getting burned like the M's"
Well, the obvious reason for the trade was winning this year. And now it looks like they arent even going to make the postseason, while they gave up two young promising starters in Smith and Eveland, Carlos Quentin and three other good prospects. Dont get me wrong, Haren brought what he was supposed to, I just think they overpaid big time for an opportunity to win this year and they arent winning.
Posted by: viktor06 | September 18, 2008 at 09:20 AM
If it's true that Bedard has a torn Labrum, then Seattle should non-tender him. Labrum Surgery requires a year to recover from, and it makes no sense to commit at least another $7 million dollars to pay for Bedard to rehab his final year before Free Agency.
Posted by: morisato | September 18, 2008 at 10:38 AM
Juice, it's certainly possible that the find nothing wrong, but, people generally get exploratory surgery when they expect to find something wrong.
MRIs aren't great. They generally only find really bad damage. As much as I hate to say it, Curt Schilling's blog entry on his surgery was a great read. He talked a lot about how the MRIs didn't show any damage, but there was a lot wrong when they went in.
Posted by: yanksfan | September 18, 2008 at 10:41 AM
This clinches it. If it is a true labrum tear, then it might be effectively the end of the career for Bedard. If that's true, WOW! This may be one of the worst trades in Seattle history. Sorry, Ms fans. Wow.
Posted by: basemonkey | September 18, 2008 at 11:02 AM
Ouch, I had surgery on my labrum 6 weeks ago, I just got out of my sling today, and now I have 28 weeks of rehab
for pitchers they are career killers (Robert Pearson, Rob Nen, Ryan Anderson) but I want to say that Chris Carpenter had the surgery done, then won the cy young
Posted by: prov1x41 | September 18, 2008 at 12:33 PM
If they non-tender him, Toronto seems like the absolute perfect place for him. They have the depth to take on an injury project and still compete if he fails.
Not to mention that he is Canadian and would absolutely love to play at home.
Posted by: Grant77 | September 18, 2008 at 01:24 PM
Yes Melonis... my mistake, it should say Haren and not Bedard in that post. My bad.
Posted by: nrmax88 | September 18, 2008 at 03:40 PM
viktor, they didn't trade Quentin in the Haren trade. That was in a trade with the White Sox. And besides, it isn't as if this was Arizona's one chance and they blew it. They are looking good to compete for the next half a decade atleast.
Posted by: nrmax88 | September 18, 2008 at 03:44 PM
Start wearing purple,
He's injured and probably won't be back until Late July Early August of next season, why hang on to him if he ain't gonna pitch and obviously waste a roster spot for someone that probably has talent.
Posted by: Ms4life | September 18, 2008 at 04:13 PM
"Not to mention that he is Canadian and would absolutely love to play at home."
Bedard is Quebequois and barely spoke a word of English before entering professional baseball. I doubt he could call Toronto "home".
Posted by: AA | September 18, 2008 at 05:53 PM
erik bedard is french-canadian but he is not quebecois
eastern ontario is across the river from Que and has always been a bilingual area.
fine line, maybe, but it's a bit like going around 'informing' everyone that some dude from eugene, oregon is "a californian"
Posted by: crash | September 19, 2008 at 03:06 AM
"erik bedard is french-canadian but he is not quebecois"
You are right. He is a Franco-Ontarian from the Capital Region. Still, I don't think Toronto exactly qualifies as "home" for the guy.
Posted by: AA | September 19, 2008 at 01:05 PM