![]() |
|
|
| |
« Dodgers, Phillies Interested In Iguchi | Main | Stark's Latest: Cain, Beltre, Burrell, Wigginton »
Today's link collection...
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e200e554e04f208833
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Odds and Ends: Downs, Furcal, Saltalamacchia:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
Scott Downs = Most underrated reliever in baseball.
I'd like to see Ryan moved, even if you eat half his contract for a young very good SS.
Posted by: juiced | September 04, 2008 at 10:35 AM
I imagine that Furcal will be one of the more sought after free agents. He leads a weak FA class at a premium position and costs no draft picks. The Royals, Orioles, Blue Jays, Cardinals, Dodgers, and even the Giants are just a few teams that will show interest in the short stop. A 3-4 year deal isn't out of the question, but how much will he get paid? Orlando Cabrera and Edgar Renteria really round the market at this position. Will Furcal hold out to see how much these guys sign for first?
Posted by: Orioles13 | September 04, 2008 at 12:02 PM
Furcal has said to want to stay in LA and the Dodgers have also said they want him to stay, so I have a feeling they'll work something out.
Going to leave a very bare market, with a lot of demand.
I think Renteria has an option as well, team option, can't remember.
Posted by: juiced | September 04, 2008 at 12:17 PM
Scott Downs isn't just one of the most underrated Relievers in baseball I would put him in the top 3 middle relievers and likely the best 8th inning guy.
Posted by: Dev0 | September 04, 2008 at 12:35 PM
"Furcal has said to want to stay in LA and the Dodgers have also said they want him to stay, so I have a feeling they'll work something out.
Going to leave a very bare market, with a lot of demand."
Furcal stays in L.A., especially if he makes a late charge to end this season and lead the club into the playoffs.
That leaves Cabrera as the best choice with Renteria very obviously more suited to the fastball-heavy NL. Funny thing about those two is that they hate each other.
I bet someone over pays for Cabrera with Furcal off the market.
The others on that market are either solid but not spectacular (Eckstein) or injury prone experiments (Nomar).
Posted by: AA | September 04, 2008 at 01:54 PM
I didnt know that O-Cab and Renteria hate each other. An don a side note, who will take over 2B for the WSox when Alexei takes over at short?
Posted by: ballerwhiteboy | September 04, 2008 at 03:28 PM
"I didnt know that O-Cab and Renteria hate each other."
With a passion. Their families are have a long standing feud and they personally have feuded over money, namely Renteria wanting Cabrera to invest in his business ventures.
Posted by: AA | September 04, 2008 at 05:29 PM
"Scott Downs isn't just one of the most underrated Relievers in baseball I would put him in the top 3 middle relievers and likely THE BEST 8TH INNING GUY."
I would agree that Downs is underrated, but being the best 8th inning guy... NO WAY. Scot Shields is BY FAR followed by Carlos Marmol. Shields has been the most consistent since '05. Downs has only been good since last year.
Posted by: #1 Angels Fan | September 04, 2008 at 05:39 PM
"An don a side note, who will take over 2B for the WSox when Alexei takes over at short?"
Juan Uribe would be with Crede/Fields taking over at 3rd.
Posted by: #1 Angels Fan | September 04, 2008 at 05:41 PM
"Juan Uribe would be with Crede/Fields taking over at 3rd."
I can't imagine that is the best the ChiSox can do. Christopher Getz makes more sense than Uribe.
Posted by: AA | September 04, 2008 at 05:55 PM
"I can't imagine that is the best the ChiSox can do. Christopher Getz makes more sense than Uribe."
No they could do way better than Uribe... I agree... Just about everyone is better than Uribe. But if Getz didnt work out or if the WSOX dont upgrade in offseason, Uribe would come into ST as starter.
Posted by: #1 Angels Fan | September 04, 2008 at 06:09 PM
downs has made himself better every year and he could become a lefty duchscherer. but then again, relievers are the maybe the least predictable from season to season.
like scot (give me a t) shields
Posted by: crash | September 04, 2008 at 07:13 PM
What about signing Mark Ellis? I'm not to keen on having Uribe go back to everyday work. What about Iguchi???
Posted by: ballerwhiteboy | September 04, 2008 at 09:22 PM
So let me get this straight because Downs wasn't as good as Shields 3 years ago he's not as good as him right now?
Downs 2007 - 4-2 2.17 era 58 Innings 57-24 k/bb 15 runs allowed
Downs 2008 - 0-2 1.23 era 66 innings pitched 10 runs 56-23 k/bb
Shields 2007 4-5 3.86era 77 innings 36 runs 77-33 k/bb
Shields 2008 6-4 2.72era 53 IP
16 ER 53-24
Marmol 2007 5-1 1.43 era 69 IP 11 Runs 96-35 k/bb
Marmol 2008 2-3 2.58 76.2 IP 26 Runs 102-36
Well ok Shields likely shouldn't be in this conversation, and I'll stick with my statement. Marmol 37 runs allowed in 2 years Scott Downs 25 I will concede that Mamrol has pitched more innings but even that would still make it a coin flip.
Posted by: Dev0 | September 04, 2008 at 09:34 PM
Shields has been the most consistent since '05 out of any reliever. Record is not important because most relievers have losing records anyway so you can't judge them on that, innings for a reliever is uncontrollable the manager decides how long they are in the game, strike outs are good, but you don't have to strike out everyone their job is to get outs and relivers aren't always perfect so it's unknown how many of those walks or runs came in the same game. Those games would severly effect their ERA. The only stat that's really important for 8TH inning guys (set-up men) is holds and in the last 2 years Shields has 58 while Downs has 45 and Marmol has 41. I didnt say Downs wasn't valuable, I said he was UNDERRATED... so we agreed... however when it comes to set-up men, their job is to hold the lead for the team and hand the ball to the closer and Shields has been the most consistent.
Posted by: #1 Angels Fan | September 04, 2008 at 10:09 PM
relievers are also the hardest to be stats-geeked. marmol has minimal ERA's and WHIP's and XYZ's but he's got a big IOU
hanging over him. until he does otherwise - marmol will be the guy who was the d-backs' BITCH last year.
speaking of stats and d-backs, bunny-hug kyim had great number, didn't he.
Posted by: crash | September 04, 2008 at 10:15 PM
"So let me get this straight because Downs wasn't as good as Shields 3 years ago he's not as good as him right now?"
3 years ago they didn't even compare! Shields was a set-up guy while Downs was a middle relief man who spot started and before that Downs was a full time starter. And in that time Shields had 81 holds. They don't compare.
Posted by: #1 Angels Fan | September 04, 2008 at 10:17 PM
"...speaking of stats and d-backs, bunny-hug kyim had great number, didn't he."
Yah he had 2 maybe 3 good years but look what happened to him after that, he isn't consistent!
Posted by: #1 Angels Fan | September 04, 2008 at 10:21 PM
Holds would include innings pitched as well not to mention Opportunity and the Angels have won a lot more then the Jays. On top of that Downs was not the only setup man in Toronto last year because Casey Janssen was there also.
Posted by: Dev0 | September 04, 2008 at 10:30 PM
"...Holds would include innings pitched..."
Actually if a reliever came in with the lead of 3 or less and a runner on base and faced just one batter and got him out, then was taken out of the game it would count as a hold even though he only pitched 1/3 of an inning. I'm not saying that's the case with Shields. Shields only pitches one inning, 2 is rare for him. The Angels don't need to throw him any longer because they have Arredondo, Franky and Speier, who is starting to come around. Downs does pitch more innings because he is used differently than Shields is. That's a managerial difference between Gaston and Scoscia. Neither way is better, just different.
"On top of that Downs was not the only setup man in Toronto last year because Casey Janssen was there also."
Why do you keep arguing with me as if I think Downs sucks? I never said that. I said he was underrated from the beginning of this thread. Downs is a solid reliever and I wish he was an Angel. He would fill a middle relief spot in the Angels bullpen and add another dangerous arm at the end of the game. Shields is just more consistent and has been his whole career. What's wrong with admitting that? Oh, and Shields wasn't the only set-up guy for the Angels either, nor is he this year. Last year he split time with Speier and this year he's splitting time with Arredondo. That's normal, most teams have 2 set-up men, they do it that way so one doesn't get burnt out.
Posted by: #1 Angels Fan | September 04, 2008 at 11:01 PM