![]() |
|
|
| |
« Introducing MLB Trade Rumors Mobile | Main | Odds and Ends: Myers, Crede, Giants »
George King of the New York Post has a handful of Yankees rumors this morning.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e2010535c21c36970b
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Yankees Rumors: Mussina, Giambi, Teixeira:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
I don't think I'd count on a healthy Posada. He will be 37 next season. The only way he stays healthy is at first or DH. It was shoulder surgery, right?
Posted by: themarksmith | October 29, 2008 at 10:36 AM
Considering the catching market, relying on a healthy and productive Jorge Posada is still a better bet than relying on a healthy and productive Pudge or Varitek.
People can bemoan the contract, but the fact remains that the Yankees are still much better off with Posada, risk and all, than without him.
Posted by: AndrewYF | October 29, 2008 at 10:43 AM
I think it's time the Yankees quit holding on to their "precious" prospects and trade for help. I'd look at catcher first, because it would be ignorant for them to think Posada will be okay playing backstop next season, as marksmith has already said, he will be turning 37. Everyone knows catchers don't age well (see Piazza, Mike). And would they really count on Jose Molina to start for them when Posada goes down? And it's not an if, it's a when. He won't last the season as their catcher, count on that.
And as for Giambi, I think the Yanks would be smart to keep their options open just in case they FAIL in their bid for Teixeira.
Posted by: Ink&Paper | October 29, 2008 at 10:49 AM
The whole catching situation is going to get very interesting. Both the Yankees and Red Sox are relying on luck and one might get away with it but probably not both. The Rangers have to be sitting there licking their chops waiting for one or both of the evil empires to get desperate and severely over-pay for the likes of Laird or Saltalamachia.
Posted by: MickS | October 29, 2008 at 10:55 AM
Andrew I agree..they pretty much had ZERO choice when it came to Posada and the contract. Hopefully he will be ok this season, after that who knows?
Posted by: yankeegirl49 | October 29, 2008 at 11:01 AM
i don't know why there hasn't been any talk of the Yanks being interested in the Rangers' catching surplus. Why not offer a package like Ian Kennedy and Ross Ohlendorf, both pitchers, for Saltalamacchia. Salty could play first or bat DH, while Posada catches, and then be behind the dish on days off, until Posada calls it a career as a backstop. At which time, Salty would take over the reigns, be a stop gap, or just be too good a hitter to move off first; a nice problem to have. As a 1B, Salty could be a poor man's Tex next season.
Posted by: aj7380 | October 29, 2008 at 11:02 AM
MickS beat me to the punch. i hate when work gets in the way of important things.
Posted by: aj7380 | October 29, 2008 at 11:03 AM
I think the Pirates would be really pissed if we offered Texas Ohlendorf.
Posted by: Not Joe Morgan | October 29, 2008 at 11:11 AM
It'll be smart to keep the options open with Giambi, especially if they are not "going wild" on Tex.
Giambi made alot of big outs last year without a doubt, but he did carry the team for a little while. Plus its not easy finding guys who put up 30-100.
He apparently is a good clubhouse guy and I think would be willing to sign to a reasonable contract.
I would not be surprised to see him back in a Yankee uniform if Tex is not signed.
Posted by: Chris | October 29, 2008 at 11:12 AM
NJM - You're right...but it may lead to a whole new cost effective way to trade. Trade players from other teams! lol
Also to aj and the others on here...Molina, although not a good hitter, has one of the best arms in the league. We also have Cervelli waiting in the wings...and Romine & Montero in AA next year. If we're going to trade young pitching, I doubt it will be for catching...unless Jorge's shoulder is just toast.
As for Giambi, he hit less than 2 bills with RISP, can't play D and is an injury waiting to happen. No thanx!
Posted by: jjyankeesfan2 | October 29, 2008 at 11:18 AM
Do Yankee fans still think that Ian Kennedy is the centerpiece for a trade? I'm just asking. I don't see it. If I'm the Rangers, I'm at least amused by any suggestion that Kennedy nets Salty.
Posted by: MickS | October 29, 2008 at 11:24 AM
yeah, it is j time to move on from Giambino, even if we don't acquire Teixeira.
I also would most definitely live with Molina's offense (remember when he was leading teh team in doubles before he got cold) when he is putting up 50%cs and working well with pitchers
Posted by: ArodMVP217 | October 29, 2008 at 11:28 AM
The traditional catching problems come from the player's legs wearing out due to squating with the gear on from the age of 15 or so into their 30's. Posada started catching when he was 21, and he didn't play more than 2/3 of a season until he was 28. Posada has a *lot* less wear on him than most catchers his age do.
Realistically, Posada's either not going to have the arm to spend any significant time at catcher, or he'll be catching full time. I don't think it's likely that it'll fall anywhere in between. And if his arm won't let him throw, then that should become clear during his rehab that starts in about a month.
As for replacements, even when he was hitting Salty's bat only impresses if he's playing catcher. And it's been a while since he's hit decently at all. So he's not that appealing right now. Between Posada's contract situation and the stockpile of catchers the Yankees will have in AA next year (Cervelli, Romine, Montero), you don't trade for a top notch catching prospect unless you're absolutely sure that Posada's days at catcher are over.
Posted by: yanksfan | October 29, 2008 at 11:36 AM
I can understand the sentiment of having Giambi move on, and he is an example of the player that they want to move away from, but I just don't see that many options out there for 1B. They already said they don't want the whole Damon/Matsui/Posada thing at 1B.
They are in a tight spot without signing Tex.
Posted by: Chris | October 29, 2008 at 11:38 AM
But that's what I'm saying. The Yanks are relying on a bit of luck. What if Posada really is done as a Catcher? Bit of a problem, don't you think?
Posted by: MickS | October 29, 2008 at 11:41 AM
"Posada's either not going to have the arm to spend any significant time at catcher, or he'll be catching full time. I don't think it's likely that it'll fall anywhere in between."
i agree with you completely but this poses another question. if he cant throw, how well can he even hit? sure hell still have his good eye but his power would be down and therefore pitchers will challenge him more. if he cant throw he might not hit well, and that will be a bigger problem.
Posted by: GeneralManager | October 29, 2008 at 11:44 AM
i belive the yankees wont make much of a deal if mussina retire.i thinks its a good idea if the yankees get a power arm like tim lincecum from the giants.that will get them a good line wang,joba and tim starting 3 its a good idea i mean tim lincecum is young he has a power arm and hes cheap
And on the giambi deal i dont think the ynkees will care that much remember the yankees are thinking about moving jeter to 1B by the 2010 season so i belive thats why they are not going all out on tex.
And something the yankees should think about is talking to the mets about beltran everybody knows the mets need bullmen help and the yankees have tha to offer so is something to think about
Posted by: johann | October 29, 2008 at 12:18 PM
i belive the yankees wont make much of a deal if mussina retire.i thinks its a good idea if the yankees get a power arm like tim lincecum from the giants.that will get them a good line wang,joba and tim starting 3 its a good idea i mean tim lincecum is young he has a power arm and hes cheap
And on the giambi deal i dont think the ynkees will care that much remember the yankees are thinking about moving jeter to 1B by the 2010 season so i belive thats why they are not going all out on tex.
And something the yankees should think about is talking to the mets about beltran everybody knows the mets need bullmen help and the yankees have that to offer so is something to think about
Posted by: johann | October 29, 2008 at 12:18 PM
I can't back anyone making the Molina argument. Even if he's throwing out 43% of runners, he's giving back all of that and so much more at the plate. .216/.263/.313 is just horrendous.
Posted by: Not Joe Morgan | October 29, 2008 at 12:19 PM
What happens if a player doesn't file for free agency? Are they forced into retirement or how does it work?
Posted by: Shaun | October 29, 2008 at 12:39 PM
Yanks should just resign Pudge and call it a day. Pudge's glove is much more important to me than his bat.tart Why trade prospects for a catcher when you have a viable free agent option? Also, we mave Montero and Romine who figures to at least start their mlb careers of as a catchers who should be ready by 2010 or 2011.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | October 29, 2008 at 12:57 PM
"But that's what I'm saying. The Yanks are relying on a bit of luck. What if Posada really is done as a Catcher? Bit of a problem, don't you think?"
I wouldn't say it's relying on luck any more so than with any other decision. Posada and his surgeon both feel that he'll be able to catch next year, so you have to assume that will be the case until you have reason to believe otherwise.
Yes, it is, but right now the indications from Posada and his surgeon are that he will be able to catch.
He starts throwing in December, so somewhere around January/February they should have a pretty good idea of what shape he'll be in, which still leaves time for a trade. There aren't any good free agent options, so free agent availability isn't a concern.
"i agree with you completely but this poses another question. if he cant throw, how well can he even hit? sure hell still have his good eye but his power would be down and therefore pitchers will challenge him more. if he cant throw he might not hit well, and that will be a bigger problem."
Who knows. Throwing and hitting are completely different arm motions. We'll find out when he rehabs, but so far there hasn't been much concern about his hitting ability.
Jeff Bagwell's shoulder barely let him play first his last few seasons, yet he still hit well. Pujols has a bad throwing elbow which forced him to first base, yet he's still one of the best hitters in the game. You really can't judge someone's hitting ability by their throwing ability.
Posted by: yanksfan | October 29, 2008 at 01:03 PM
Why is it that so many other teams can clearly carry a weak bat in their line up at "defesive priority" positions but people seem to think that the Yanks couldn't? You would think that with the likes of Arod, Jeter, Damon, Matsui, Cano, Nady and Posada (if all are healthy) we can carry a week bat like Melky/Gardner or Molina if neccesary. Look at the Phillies with Ruiz at C and Felix at 3B and minus having a DH. Or the Redsucks with Varitek. If Posada's shoulder is bothering him it's probably not going to be a career long thing. A catchers arm does not get as much wear and tear as a ers arm. I would be more concerned with Mariano Rivera's surgery than I would Posada's.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | October 29, 2008 at 01:05 PM
I definitely agree that Molina can't be brought back. His defense is great but he simply holds no value as a hitter, and there are a good deal of catchers in the league who are similar players to him.
I really think the Yankees need to address the outfield though. Damon is good in left, and Nady in fine in right, but Melky and Gardner shouldn't be depended on to play center full time. Bringing in a guy like Cameron, DeJesus or even Randy Winn. The young guy can get some at bats but they really shouldn't be depended on.
Posted by: scribbletone | October 29, 2008 at 01:05 PM
What's your opinion on Juan Miranda? Does anyone think the Yanks might give him a shot if they don't sign Tex?
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | October 29, 2008 at 01:08 PM
"Yanks should just resign Pudge and call it a day. Pudge's glove is much more important to me than his bat.tart Why trade prospects for a catcher when you have a viable free agent option?"
As a Yankee, Pudge hit about as well as Molina. As a Tiger, he had about one good month and was terrible the rest of the season. His defense wasn't as good as Molina's, and the Yankee pitchers really didn't like working with him. There's no advantage to him.
"Also, we mave Montero and Romine who figures to at least start their mlb careers of as a catchers who should be ready by 2010 or 2011."
2011 more likely. They both played A ball this year. Montero has the hitting skills to move fast, but needs a lot of work defensively. Romine leans the opposite.
Posted by: yanksfan | October 29, 2008 at 01:10 PM
Pudge hit .295 overall. Before coming to the Yanks he hit:
.258 in April
.257 in May
.333 in June
.358 in July
and then tanked when traded to the Yanks.
We simply dont have the recources (prospects) to make major trades. So why not hold on to what we have and suplement via free agency. And again, why can't we carry a week bat in our line up (Molina or Melky/Gardner)?
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | October 29, 2008 at 01:28 PM
"Throwing and hitting are completely different arm motions"
yeah but it was clearly. affecting him this season.
"why would texas want Ian Kennedy to pitch"
because they need all the pitching they can get.
Posted by: GeneralManager | October 29, 2008 at 02:21 PM
Works great on my LG Chocolate Tim. Sweet!
Posted by: Spieg7 | October 29, 2008 at 02:22 PM
The problem is that Molina isn't a weak bat, he's a terrifically awful bat. A .263 OBP can't be carried anywhere. For all the deserved Varitek mockery, he was still 50 points above Molina. 50 points. And he sucked in 2008.
Posted by: Not Joe Morgan | October 29, 2008 at 02:42 PM
"yeah but it was clearly. affecting him this season."
That's what happens when you're playing with tears in your shoulder. We're talking about what to expect now that the damage has been repaired.
"hey idiots, the yankees have some pretty good catching prospects in the pipeline."
That's been acknowledged, but none of them will realistically be able to have significant role on the major league team before 2011.
Posted by: yanksfan | October 29, 2008 at 02:46 PM
my point was that whether throwing or hitting his shoulder will determine his season.
Doctors say hell be fine and back to full strength so expect 130+ games of Jorge behind the plate.
Posted by: GeneralManager | October 29, 2008 at 03:07 PM
Even if Posada comes back and only hits at the rate he did while injured in 2008 (.364 OBP, .143 isoP), he's going to be a massive boost to the lineup over Molina.
Posted by: Not Joe Morgan | October 29, 2008 at 03:19 PM
Have to Agree with NotJoeMorgan. Even just a serviceable Posada will increase the lineup big time.
Molina is fine if you need him to catch 35 games and you can pick and choose when to start him, but as an everday player, he is just awful and severly hurt the bottom of that lineup between he and Melky.
Posted by: Chris | October 29, 2008 at 03:24 PM
"i belive the yankees wont make much of a deal if mussina retire.i thinks its a good idea if the yankees get a power arm like tim lincecum from the giants.that will get them a good line wang,joba and tim starting 3 its a good idea i mean tim lincecum is young he has a power arm and hes cheap
And on the giambi deal i dont think the ynkees will care that much remember the yankees are thinking about moving jeter to 1B by the 2010 season so i belive thats why they are not going all out on tex.
And something the yankees should think about is talking to the mets about beltran everybody knows the mets need bullmen help and the yankees have that to offer so is something to think about "
Yeah, but since the Mets need a backup catcher, why not trade Jose Reyes for Jose Molina? Maybe they could get the Yankees to throw in Edwar Ramirez too? Then trade David Wright for Ian Kennedy to fill the rotation vacancy. Get'er done Omar.
Posted by: nrmax88 | October 29, 2008 at 03:39 PM
"Yanks should just resign Pudge and call it a day. Pudge's glove is much more important to me than his bat.tart Why trade prospects for a catcher when you have a viable free agent option? Also, we mave Montero and Romine who figures to at least start their mlb careers of as a catchers who should be ready by 2010 or 2011."
Pudge doesn't have a glove. All he has is an arm. His defense is blehh. There are lots of pitchers they don't like pitching to Pudge at all. He still calling too many fastballs so he can throw out baserunners?
Posted by: nrmax88 | October 29, 2008 at 03:41 PM
For some reason, people pointed to the pitching this year as the problem for the Yankees. It really wasn't, the pitching was pretty close to what it usually is. The difference is that 1000 run offense wasn't there. They went from 960 something in 2007, 930 in 2006, and only put up 789 in 2008. Their team era in 2006 was 4.41, 4.49 in 2007, and 4.28, so the pitching was actually a bit better this year then in the previous few years, the difference in this 2008 team was their offense, plain and simple. An .800 OPS CF would help out a lot. Cough, Mike Cameron. Anybody who thinks Melky's 68 OPS+ didn't hurt the Yankees (I am looking at you Yankeefansince78), you are dead wrong. Add a guy like Cameron to CF, possibly Tex, and the Yankees will be back in the playoffs in 2009, or, atleast right back into contention. Cameron, Tex, and CC, and this is probably the favorite to go back to the World Series in the AL in 2009.
Posted by: nrmax88 | October 29, 2008 at 03:44 PM
To add: The pitching improved with Ponson/Rasner getting something like 25% of the starts. Girardi pretty much got credit for nothing at year end because they missed the playoffs, but he did a really nice job with that bullpen.
Posted by: Not Joe Morgan | October 29, 2008 at 03:55 PM
i dont like the idea of Cameron being brought in at 10 mil. if theres no faith that Posada and Matsui are and can stay healthy then yes his offense would actually be needed. but if theyre fine im up for taking a chance on the young guys. if jackson is the future, and Jeters future is in left or center youre going to have to throw at least Melky out there to try and get his value up. even if he tears the cover off the ball in the minors hell still have the big league question mark.
Posted by: GeneralManager | October 29, 2008 at 04:07 PM
Yo. Who cares about Melky? Seriously? Everybody acts like signing Cameron means blocking some guy like Jordan Schafer or Colby Rasmus. Melky is a bad baseball player. He adds negative value to your team. His upside his minimal. His best asset is his glove, and even that is overated. I know Jackson is the future. It has only been brought up 9 or 12 thousand times. If you sign Cameron for one year, you bring in Austin Jackon next year, and slide him right in. Again, where does Melky fit in all of this? Who cares about Melky? The idea that when Jackson comes up that Melky will somehow slide into LF is hilarious. Melky would be by far, without a doubt, the worst LF in MLB. Every team knows what Melky is. You will never get "value" from him. Forget about Melky. Banish him to the minor leagues, never to be seen or heard from again. It is like the Mets declining to sign Orlando Hudson to a one year deal, because they have Argenis Reyes. It is beyond idiotic.
Posted by: nrmax88 | October 29, 2008 at 04:21 PM
First off no one said Melky will play LF. Nobody gets thrown away because of one bad year. youre so blinded by statistics youre losing a sense of Baseball. spending 10 mil of a stop gap because his offense is better with the people on this team, especially if they pick up Tex, is a rookie mistake.
Posted by: GeneralManager | October 29, 2008 at 04:30 PM
@johan
your post made me laugh. the chances of any team prying lincecum away from the giants is about 0%. any team would have to WAY over trade for him. yankees fan are always providing new ways to make me laugh.
Posted by: sjdurfey | October 29, 2008 at 04:32 PM
Nrmax88:
You and I have had our battles and at this point I could care less about what you think of Melky. Furthoremore, I'm not his agent and not getting my 3% of his salary to be his cheerleader but if you think a 24 year old CF who never played "organized baseball" in the states prior t0 2003 when the Yanks signed him as a FA from the Dominican and only played 3 minor league seasons before becoming a starter is done and has reached his ceiling then so be it. But keep in mind these facts:
1-In his 372 minor league games he has a lifetime .296 avg/.349 obp/.769 ops. That shows potential from a very young guy.
2-In 07 he hit .273 w/ 73 rbis as a #9 batter.
3- People have consistantly praised him for his defense (35 assists in 2 1/2 seasons).
The Yanks are a team that has become unathletic and very old. Of our 9 position players in '08 7 of them were at least 34 years old. Cano, Melky and Nady are the only position players under 30. If you feel that a 24 yr old player who has shown the ability to handle CF and has shown "potential" of being a decent hitter is worth throwing away, then that's your opinion. Let's hope Cash doesn't feel that way. People like you are the exact problem that Yanks have had in the past. The inability or unwillingness to work with a young player and let them work thru their problems. Melky showed he can be a decent hitter in 06 and 07. I think a player at his age still has the ability to get better. People are acting as if CF is the only problem in the OF. It's not. After 09 we lose Damon, Matsui and possibly Nady. If Abreu isn't resigned this year then there's a distinct possibility that after '09 we won't have any OF's left at all. Why not let Melky and Gardner play the season out. Their lack of offense isn't going to cost us anything.
Look around at all the playoff teams. They all have players that provide defense but have a week bat.
Phillies-Felix and Ruiz
Rays-Gross
RedSucks- Varitek
Brewers- Hall and Weeks
Let's say the Yanks signed Cameron this year to a 1 year deal. After 09 you would have Melky, Gardner and Ajax as the only options under control for the 2010 season. That means another year wondering what Melky and Gardner can do and if Ajax is ready.
Yanks would be better served finding offense at 1B and allowing Melky/Gardner to show what they can do in a full season. Give Gardner enough at bats at the major league level to see if he's got it or not and see if Melky can rebound. WHat the hell do we have hitting coaches for? I would hope that the Yanks are using the winter and spring training to try and work his kikns out. We can't afford to keep throwing away rookies who dont automatically "get it" and replace them with high paid older free agents. When will the madness stop?!
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | October 29, 2008 at 05:09 PM
One bad year? More like one average year, followed by one bad year, followed by a truly horrendous year. But okay. Spending 10 mil on a 800 OPS fielder, who is an upgrade offensively, defensively, on the basepaths, in the clubhouse, on a one/two year deal, for a team with unlimited resources, for a team with no viable CF option for 2009, and a team with a top CF prospect who will be ready in a year or so is obviously a rookie mistake. Thank you for setting me straight, Mr. Seasoned Veteran General Manager Guru.
Posted by: nrmax88 | October 29, 2008 at 05:14 PM
"After 09 we lose Damon, Matsui and possibly Nady. If Abreu isn't resigned this year then there's a distinct possibility that after '09 we won't have any OF's left at all. Why not let Melky and Gardner play the season out. Their lack of offense isn't going to cost us anything. "
Oh my! How could the Yankees ever find a LF to replace Johnny Damon when he leaves? It isn't like they could go out and throw money at Holliday? Or Crawford? Vlad? Gimme a break. Even if Damon, Matsui, Nady, and Abreu all leave, so what? You have A Jax in CF, and Melky is not a viable LF option anyway. Infact, just thinking about Melky's offensive output in LF on a 250 million dollar payroll, I don't know whether to laugh or cry. Even if Melky reaches his peak upside, he will still be an awful LF option. Same with Gardner. So the fact that some corner OF's may be leaving is quite irrelevant. Jackson is your CF of the future. Melky and Gardner have no value playing corner OF spots. I don't even know why I bother arguing with you.
You also just cited Bill Hall and Ricky Weekes as defensive specialists. Again, I don't know whether to laugh or cry.
Posted by: nrmax88 | October 29, 2008 at 05:20 PM
youre welcome...good luck with the old guy ywho hasnt seen the AL, let alone the caliber of pitchers in the AL east, in 5 years. unlimited resources or not you dont spend 10 million on a stop gap player. hed be batting 9th. all you need is someone that can handle a bat, Scott Brosius never had a .800 OPS for the Yanks.
Posted by: GeneralManager | October 29, 2008 at 05:25 PM
Oh ok. So if we have a difference in opion then you turn to sarcasim. Why re you so sure that your way is the right way? Melky's defense has never been the issue. If he hit 25 hrs and had a .800 obp then we would be happy right? So that means Cameron is coming in to provide better offense. I could care less about how good a guy he is because I've never heard anyone say that Melky wasn't a bad guy. So call it what it is...an offensive improvement. The difference is I'm looking beyond just the '08 season and you are. You put together teams like your playing a fantasy league game. If Cash is truly interested in developing home grown players and getting younger then he needs to see what Melky and Gardner can do. I'll even make a case that Gardner should even be given more of a chance than Melky considering that he has only played 2 months in the majors. But of course your the GM w/ the crystal ball and you can see the future. You already "KNOW" that Gardner and Melky at the ripe ages of 24 and 25 have fufilled their potential. Ridiculous. Unless I'm making a HUGE improvement, like bringing in an all-star FA, then I would like to see what we have from those two. And if the team offense fails I guarantee you it's not because of our CF or C.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | October 29, 2008 at 05:27 PM
he did his first year with the Yanks. sorry about that.
Posted by: GeneralManager | October 29, 2008 at 05:27 PM
it's still too early to say who's going where or what trades are going to happen...so i will comment on some of the above posts.
red sucks???...did you think of that one at one of your Mensa meetings?
and saying that team x has "prospects down the line"...hmmm, once again..."prospects down the line". what is the key word in that sentence.
and to justify someone's potential based on minor league stats doesn't always work. any fan from any team can pick a "AAAA" player with great stats. a player's potential is based on much more of the "physical" attributes. i mean, jeff bailey was named international league player of the year, and charlie zink was named international league pitcher of the year.
Posted by: Boston Belongs To Me | October 29, 2008 at 05:32 PM
Yeah, facing guys like Derek Lowe, Brad Penny, Brandon Webb, Randy Johnson, Aaron Cook, Ubaldo Jiminez, Matt Cain, Tim Lincecum, Jon Sanchez, Carlos Zambrano, Ted Lilly, Ryan Dempster, Rich Harden, Aaron Harang, Edinson Volcuez, Johnny Cueto, Roy Oswalt, Adam Wainwright etc. must have a been a real walk in the park. Why don't you spend 10 million on a stop gap player? That is some of the weirdest logic I have ever heard. I am guessing you just made that up as you were typing up your post. Tell me, do you spend 10 million on an .800 OPS center fielder with pop, speed, and elite defense? Because that is pretty much what Torii Hunter is, and he is making 18 million. Scott Brosius actually had a couple of 800 OPS season, how that is relevant, I have absolutely no idea.
Posted by: nrmax88 | October 29, 2008 at 05:33 PM
I put together teams like I am in a fantasy league? Is that why I was very outspokenly against Johan Santana, and K-Rod? And Carlos Lee, and Alfonso Soriano? And Orlando Hudson? I love how you just assume Melky is an equal fielder to Cameron, when Cameron is far superior, not only in fielding, but in every part of baseball that matters.
Posted by: nrmax88 | October 29, 2008 at 05:35 PM
"Scott Brosius actually had a couple of 800 OPS season, how that is relevant, I have absolutely no idea."
because he had 1, his first, during 4 years with the Yanks, hitting while hitting 9th where its most likly the CF is going to bat. reading comp not a strong suit of yours.
nice job mentioning the 1-2s of each rotation while mixing in some very up and down starters while leaving out all the 3-5s. AL east is the Beast because of depth, starters and relievers.
you can not expect Cameron to perform at that level after jumping to the AL.
Posted by: GeneralManager | October 29, 2008 at 05:43 PM
"The difference is I'm looking beyond just the '08 season and you are"
I know, obviously you have big dreams of seeing an outfield of Austin Jackson, flanked by Melky and Gardner. You havent exactly been quiet with that idea. It sounds like an awesome plan. You are right.
Seriously though, it isn't that I am not looking to next year, it is just that next year Jackson will be ready to take over, and then what do you do with Melky after that? He just is not an option to play LF. I obviously am thinking about the future, which is why I am suggesting a stop gap. If Jackson is not ready when Camerons time is up, then yay, Melky/Gardner can hold it down for a little while until he is ready. But once Austin Jackson breaks into the Yankee lineup, there is then no use for Melky besides a 4th OF.
Posted by: nrmax88 | October 29, 2008 at 05:43 PM
Again, I don't even know why I am arguing. Leave Melky in CF. See if I care. Naybe he can shoot for a 54 OPS+ this season. Maybe if you add together his and Gardners OPS+, you could get to 100.
Posted by: nrmax88 | October 29, 2008 at 05:47 PM
I don't want to see Melky playing CF; would take Cameron in a second. Melky's combined isoP (NY and Wilkes-Barre) was under .100. That doesn't work on a huge payroll team unless you're pitching 200+ innings.
And does 33 year old Derrek Lee really make the Yankees younger? I'm sure someone can come up with a super funny line here (like YES HE DOES LOL or something), but Lee is not young. I wouldn't be against bringing him in, but that wouldn't be the reasoning.
Posted by: Not Joe Morgan | October 29, 2008 at 06:07 PM
when you have incredible young talent in the yankees farm system, i think you need to take advantage of it. you have players like mark melancon, austin jackson, dellin betances. they also have players that were no shows and still have great market value. players like hughes, kennedy and melky cabrera. i think they will have the best offseason then any other team.
Posted by: alex | October 29, 2008 at 06:54 PM
nrmax88:
Yeah you're right. You're the GM w/ the crystal ball and your crystal ball says Ajax will absolutely be our starting CF next year. It absolutely says that a 24 yr old Melky and a 25 year old Gardner won't get better. And it absolutely says that Melky will not match Cameron's .243 avg and 70 rbis....oh wait he did already...at the ripe age of 22. hmmmm. He couldn't possibly rebound from that. The idea that a young player comes into the major, maybe a little early, has some success for a year, shows some promise and then struggles one year but then bounces back the next is absurd. Right that can't happen. He's peaked at age 24 and will never get better and put up better or comparable numbers than the mighty Mike Cameron at age 36.
I just have one question for you nrmax. Since you have this crystal ball did you see this financial dilema with AIG, Fanny and Sterns coming or does your crystal ball only pertain to the careers of CF's under the age of 25?
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | October 29, 2008 at 06:58 PM
And as far as replacing Johnny Damon you're right. We'll just assume that a team will not trade for Holliday this year and possibly sign him to an extension. We'll just assume that the Rays don't decide to lock up Crawford now that they are competitive. Or that the Sucks won't try and extend Bay. Let's just assume that Vlad at age 33 and w/ bad knees can play the OF full time even though he DH'd for 50 games last year and will probably DH more now that Garet Anderson is probably gone. Let's assume Nady will resign just 'cuz he love being a Yankee. Let's assume that the options for Crisp, Maglio Ordonez and Jermaine Dye will not be picked up. WHat free agents will that leave us with? Griffey, Damon, Matsui, Ankiel and Giles. Sure...great. Let's assume that because were are the NY f'in Yankees that we can get anybody and everybody. God forbid we should have a farm system that generates players that have good years and deserve a shot to see what they can do for the big league team. No...let's just bring Cameron in, resign Giambi, pick up Lowe, Mussina AND Pettite and trade Cano for whoever and whatever and sign O. Hudson as our starting 2B. Then maybe we can offer the naming rights to the new stadium to AARP. We will definetly fit their advertising demographics.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | October 29, 2008 at 07:08 PM
Guys...will it absolutely kill us to let 2 young guys play? Will it kill us to see if they can play? To call Melky anything less than a mlb capable CF is a flat out lie. And I'm not drinking the kool aid. If I remember correctly there were a lot of teams that wanted him. Giving up on him after one bad year (at age 24) is ridiculous. Not giving Gardner a shot and writing him off after 40 big league games is idiotic. Give them one year to see what they can do. If either proves themself then bam! You have yourself a player. Maybe you move Ajax over to LF. Would that be horrible? Or maybe Ajax will NOT have a good year. Nothing is written in stone with any of our young players. Why not see what they can do?
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | October 29, 2008 at 07:17 PM
YanksFanSince78, calm down there.
No one has said Gardner will be bad, but he's a scrawny guy without any signs of power. In 4 seasons of pro ball, the guy has 9 home runs. He's a singles hitter who steals bases. Even if he performs to expectations, he's not going to be anything special. It's not terrible if he ends up being the center fielder next year, but he's not the kind of guy who you plan around.
As for Melky, the guy's rookie season wasn't anything special. He's declined each year since, and was absolutely horrendous this season. It's not a one year thing with Melky, it's three years of below average performance which has continuously gotten worse.
Posted by: yanksfan | October 29, 2008 at 09:03 PM
"Right that can't happen. He's peaked at age 24 and will never get better and put up better or comparable numbers than the mighty Mike Cameron at age 36. "
Now you are starting to get it.
Posted by: nrmax88 | October 29, 2008 at 09:25 PM
YanksFanSince78,
If your arguments key evidence is based around batting average and RBI's, then people will take little of it seriously. You're completely and 100% cherry picking statistics (Cameron beats Melky is nearly every statistic there is), and you cherry picked two of the least meaningful stats there are. RBI's are so circumstantial that they have little legitimate meaning, and batting average is nice and all but little can be made of batting average.
"And as far as replacing Johnny Damon you're right. We'll just assume that a team will not trade for Holliday this year and possibly sign him to an extension. We'll just assume that the Rays don't decide to lock up Crawford now that they are competitive. Or that the Sucks won't try and extend Bay."
Ugh, that isn't the point. The point is that at this point, Johnny Damon isn't exactly an elite player, and with the Yankees' financial might, he shouldn't be very difficult to replace, one way or another. There are a lot of outfielders that can hit a little bit.
yanksfan seems to be understanding what the outside world sees.
Gardner simply doesn't have enough power to be a good everyday option, and best case scenario he's giving you a .360 OBP, zero power, good defense and steals. That's good, but if you're the Yankees you don't spend your time developing a guy who is already 25 into that.
I get that whole blah blah blah the Yankees don't need a star at every position, but its not about stars or names or age. It's about production and performance. And if you're a team with nearly unlimited resources, you should put forward the best effort to put the best possible team on the field. Having Cabrera/Gardner in center simply isn't the best team possible.
Adding a stopgap would be so logical that I honestly don't know why you don't agree. Cabrera and Gardner surely did affect the Yankees' overall performance on offense this year. I'm not just blaming them, there were other issues like Cano and Posada and Matsui, but realistically having a black hole in center hurt.
The Yankees scored 886 runs in 2005, 930 runs in 2006, 968 runs in 2007, and then a stark drop to just 789 runs in 2008. The Yankees offense was the problem in 2008, according to the numbers
Posted by: scribbletone | October 29, 2008 at 09:54 PM
"Ugh, that isn't the point. The point is that at this point, Johnny Damon isn't exactly an elite player, and with the Yankees' financial might, he shouldn't be very difficult to replace, one way or another. There are a lot of outfielders that can hit a little bit. "
And even if it was Damon circa 2003 (I still love Damon as a player), my main point really is that a team like the Yankees will always be able to go find a LF guy to mash. They are all over if you are willing to pay for them. LF is probably the easiest position to replace a bat.
Thank you Scribble. I was beginning to get really frustrated. Eventually I just had to go sit down, roll one up, and watch the Knick's beat the Heat(lol). I consider the Knicks win tonight revenge against the Marlins for knocking the Mets out two years in a row. Take that fish ;)
Posted by: nrmax88 | October 29, 2008 at 10:08 PM
"And even if it was Damon circa 2003 (I still love Damon as a player), my main point really is that a team like the Yankees will always be able to go find a LF guy to mash. They are all over if you are willing to pay for them. LF is probably the easiest position to replace a bat."
See thats what I don't get. These Yankee fans actually WANT to give Melky a chance to become the everyday LF, even though his ceiling wouldn't even make him a good one. If the Yankees were willing to shell out some of their nearly unlimited cash though, they could easily land a big time slugger to play in left.
But the fans insist that getting younger (and worse) is the better way to go. You guys aren't the Twins. You don't need to develop all of your talent from within. The Yankees have done a great job lately at developing young talent, and they continue to do that.
Throwing ML at bats at Melky and Gardner has nothing to do with the youth movement in New York.
". Eventually I just had to go sit down, roll one up, and watch the Knick's beat the Heat(lol). I consider the Knicks win tonight revenge against the Marlins for knocking the Mets out two years in a row. Take that fish ;)"
And I'm sure it was sweeter knowing that Eddy Curry and Stephon Marbury both got DNP-CD's on opening night.
Posted by: scribbletone | October 29, 2008 at 11:21 PM
Curry, yeah. Steph, I actually feel a bit bad for because of all the heat he takes here. Yeah, he hasn't won, and he could be a headcase, but the teams always suck and the coaching/front office is a mess and he takes a lot of heat (he deserves some heat, not what he gets)he doesn't necesarrily deserve. Plus, he is in a contract year and had a good camp so I don't get why not see if what he can do playing for his next deal.
Steph is a cool dude too. I saw him getting out of his Rolls one day from my boy's car, and yelled "Yo Steph!". It crossed my mind to taunt him, but my man came right up to the car and gave me a pound and was like "whattup?" Like he knew me. I was like Steph you gonna leave us? And he was like "nah kid I ain't goin nowhere. Still got work to do."
I have to always root for him now. Anyway, enough basketball. Sorry about that. This will probably be the shining moment of the Knick's season though.
Posted by: nrmax88 | October 29, 2008 at 11:43 PM
Isn't what what Cash said he wants to do? Be more self-reliant and develope young players? Why is that a bd course of action for the Yanks to take? Now in the case like a Texiera at first we don't have any options at all except for Miranda and in this case we can't afford to pass up Texiera because he's aproven superstar and he's still very young. If Grady Sizemore were a free agent then yes I would say sorry to Melky and Gardner but there not. I don't see Cameron at age 36 a MAJOR contributor. I know you guys want to talk about homeruns..blah blah blah. If Melky can turn into a .280, 15 hr , 80 rbi guy with a glove then I'm happy because now we have a possible option for next year. With Damon walking out the door next year I want to see what Gardner can do. If he shows he can be a .280/.350 guy who can steal 50 bases then he's my starting CF in 09 unless Ajax just has an incredible showing. If I have to weigh bringing in Cameron this year vs knowing what I have for winter of 09 when it's possible we won't have Abreu, Nady, Damon, Matsui to count on then then I go with preparing myself for 09. If we have a healthy players for the whole year and get Tex then I really dont care about production from my #9 guy. Just because we have a gazillion dollars doesnt mean we have to have a 350 million dollar payroll and gobble up every single FA like we're a fantasy league team. If you disagree then ok, let's move on. But obviously Cash must think something of Cabrera or else he would've traded for him. And I'm sure if he felt it was a huge weekness then he would've addressed it furing the season.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | October 30, 2008 at 12:37 AM
My bad. I meant to say he would've traded Melky away (when the Twins and other teams were after him last year).
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | October 30, 2008 at 12:39 AM
I really don't understand the concern about Posada. Like someone said in a post before he didn't start catching until he was 21 and never played a full season well after that behind the plate. It's his shoulder that is hurt not his legs which is usually the concern with catchers. And even if he drops off from his usual numbers and Molina has to catch more than we would like its still better than what is out there. Come on can anyone really name any catchers that contribute offensively besides Mauer, Martin, Soto, and McCann? The Yankees are lucky to have Posada...injury risk and all.
First base really shouldn't be that big of a concern either. I like what I saw from Miranda and Betemits still there....plus where are we going to put Jeter in a couple years if Tex is signed to a 7 year deal? And I don't understand why Cashman is so against testing Matsui out at first....he is just going to be a DH otherwise why not try to see what he can do there. He is a great athlete and it would save his knees compared to playing the OF.
I think we have all the options now to fix this club offensively. Giambi will be gone and Abreu too. I like Abreu but he just wasn't a gritty player and played weak defense. If the Yanks could work a deal Cano for Kemp....or signed Cameron if they couldn't they would have an incredible defensive OF. Nady in right, Cameron in center (one of the top 3 defensive CF's) and even though Damon doesn't have a strong arm he covers a ton of ground in left.
Personally this is the lineup I would like for '09
LF Damon
SS Jeter
RF Nady
3B Arod
DH Matsui
C Posada
2B Cano
CF Cameron
1B Betemit/Miranda
that would be a pesky and gritty lineup and the only newcomer would be Cameron.
Concentrate on pitching Cashman....you already have the tools to put out a potent lineup.
Posted by: yanks09 | October 30, 2008 at 04:15 AM
i personally think that this will be a great lineup for '09
LF Damon
SS Jeter
cf beltran
3B Arod
rf nady
C Posada
2B Cano
Dh matsui
1B Betemit/Miranda
Posted by: johann | October 30, 2008 at 06:44 AM
johann,
The Mets aren't actually going to move Beltran, he's just too good.
And the Yankees are far too good and way too rich to have a bench guy and a AAAA manning first in Betemit/Miranda.
And yanksfansince78,
It seems like other Yankee fans have accepted that Melky and Gardner are just bench guys, why can't you?
Did you ever think that maybe Cashman made a mistake by not moving Melky at his highest value? Just because Cash once highly valued Melky doesn't make him a good prospect.
The fact of the matter is that you can afford a superior player to Melky/Gardner without hurting you future, and you're opposed to that. Even if Melky becomes a .280/.340/.440 guy, Jackson is still going to get a shot in center, and those numbers are poor for a LF, especially on the Yankees.
And way to ignore like every argument I made. Obviously you would sign Sizemore if he was a FA, he was one I the 10 best players in baseball this year. You guys scored nearly 200 runs less in 2008 than in 2007, and yet you think it's okay to have mediocre production from center when you can afford otherwise. Having a better 9 hitter would surely make a difference, as better depth in the lineup would make them less reliant on Rodriguez and the older guys.
Posted by: scribbletone | October 30, 2008 at 09:13 AM
"will it absolutely kill us to let 2 young guys play?"
Not if they are good or high upside. Sadly, neither Gardner or Melky profile as high upside. Its not about age, its about production.
Posted by: Not Joe Morgan | October 30, 2008 at 11:28 AM
We scored 200 runs fewer last year because we were w/o Posada and Matsui for most of the year and Rodreiguez had a 45 rbi drop off...jeez. Forget it. Sign a 36 year old CF. Then we'll have Posada, Jeter, Arod, Matsui, Damon and Cameron all 34 years of age or older. It's crazy...all year long people have been complaining about how old a team we are. If you're giving up on Melky then please tell me why Gardner can't get a shot? He's only played 142 at bats, surely you don't feel that he's a bust after so few of a samplings? Can you honestly say that he's incapable of hitting .280, .350 obp , 50 rbis and 50 sbs? That's basically what Ellsbury did in one full year. How do we know what he can or can't do until you let him play. the attitude you people is the same that's been pervading the team for decades. Gardner can be our leadoff CF of the future. If Ajax has a great year in 09 then ok, you have more options and you make a move then. We are in no position to throw away young guys who haven't had a shot in the majors yet. Also, to say that we can have our choice of Holliday, Crawford, Bay, Ankiel, Maglio and Vlad is stupid because now your assuming that those teams won't try to resign their own players or that those players won't be locked up before they even hit the market. The Rays, Angels, And Red Sucks aren't going to just let their players walk'm not interested in paying a guy $10 mil to be a stop gap. Just because we have millions doesn't mean that we can get any player we want or that we should. Spend whatever it takes to get a #1 and #2 pitcher and a starting 1B. CF defense is not killing us and our team didn't sputter offensively because of CF. If one weal bat in the line up can kill a teams offense then explain to me how the Phillies won with Ruiz at C and Felix at 3B?
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | October 30, 2008 at 12:15 PM
1. Ellsbury is more talented than Gardner. Look at it any way you care to: draft status, scouting reports, prospect rankings, minor league stats, anything. Ellsbury is better.
2. And still, Ellsbury had a terrible OBP for a leadoff/speed guy (.336, not .350, world of difference) with no power. If he plays like that for another 2 years, Boston is looking for another CF.
3. Gardner has a nice minor league OBP but his type doesn't carry that up into the majors. Ellsbury again is a perfect parallel again and Gardner has even less power than him so pitchers will have every reason to challenge him. If the worst he can do is a single, a walk is deadly. They'll just let him slap and slap and slap, maybe get a hollow average but not get on base enough to cover for his no power, no walk results. Again, like 2008 Ellsbury.
Posted by: Not Joe Morgan | October 30, 2008 at 12:58 PM
And, to answer your Phillies parallel ...
Ruiz: .219/.320/.300
Molina: .216/.263/.313
(57 points of OBP to Ruiz!)
Feliz: .249/.302/.402 (and this ignores Dobbs)
Melky/Gardner: .244/.296/.331
I already know your response: "They could be better in 2009!" Maybe. Or they could be themselves. Or they could be worse. Not a good risk for a good team.
(And again, I'm all for young players. Can't wait for Jackson, defend Hughes as hard as anyone, etc, but they have to be good. These two might be fine CFs for poor teams; not for us.)
Posted by: Not Joe Morgan | October 30, 2008 at 01:05 PM
Maybe you're looking at something that I'm not. The only knock I have ever heard on Gardner is that he lacks power. But power isn't what I need from a leadoff guy. Scouting reports are important but you can't disregard his output. He has a lifetime minor league line of .290 avg/.389 obp with 151 sb vs 31 cs. I'd give him a shot to win the CF job vs Melky. Just my opinion. I don't see the harm. They're both competent defensively and the team offense can carry their lack of power.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | October 30, 2008 at 01:08 PM
Not Joe:
I miss your point dude. What I'm not comparing Molina vs Ruiz. What I said was the Phillies carried 2 weak bats and still managed to win. The Rays and Sucks carried weak bats as well (Gross/Varitek).
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | October 30, 2008 at 01:14 PM
At what point do you emphasize a souting report and where a player was drafted vs what a player actually does in the minors?
Completely toss out the 142 at bats Gardner had last year because it's too small a sample and if you want to technical and break down his stint by 1st call up (.161) vs 2nd call up (.294) you can see that he got better as the season and his time increased.
Ellsbury vs Gardner
Games: 250 vs 381
At Bats: 1,017 vs 1,448
HR: 10 vs 9
SB: 105 vs 151
CS: 27 vs 31
Avg: .313 vs .290
OBP: .389 vs .389
Slug: .425 vs .385
OPS: 814 vs 774
Ellsbury has an edge in every category except obp and sb. He is a better player probably. They're both 25 years old. Forget about where they were drafted because that means nothing (Mike Piazza wasn't even drafted in the first 20 rounds I think). Why do you value a players souting report and "sexy pick positioning" vs what they actually do in the minors? If Gardner put up Juan Pierre type numbers at age 26 and at 400k a year would that be a bad thing for a lead off CF?
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | October 30, 2008 at 01:40 PM
And no I'm not saying Gardner will be as good as Ellsbury. I'm just challenging how your opinion on a player can be colored by certain circumstances. perception is everything. If he were traded and end up putting up 170 hits a .285 avg, scoring 90 runs and stealing 50 bases for another team I'd be dissapointed that we gave up on him vs 1 or 2 years of having Mike Cameron.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | October 30, 2008 at 01:44 PM
"I miss your point dude. What I'm not comparing Molina vs Ruiz. What I said was the Phillies carried 2 weak bats and still managed to win. The Rays and Sucks carried weak bats as well (Gross/Varitek)."
My point was that our weak bats made their weak bats look decent. Molina and our CF platoon were both absolutely terrible.
Re: Gardner vs. Ellsbury
I value scouting reports and all that because minor league stats can be skewed by a ton of things. Hitting environment, league, ballpark, etc. In the case of Gardner, the skew is in player types. No power, OBP guys in the minors historically have trouble maintaining that one key skill in the majors. I used the Ellsbury analogy because he perfectly illustrates this point.
If he put up a .285 average but with a .325 OBP, I wouldn't care about losing him. I'm not even sure I'd want the "good" Juan Pierre because he gave back the gains of his decent OBP by getting caught stealing so damn much. If I could take 2004 Juan Pierre that runs at a 77% rate? Certainly, but I'm not sure that type of player really exists anymore. It seems like the league has gotten a lot smarter, even in the last 5 years or so, when it comes to facing those types. Something has to explain why Pierre is still fast but no longer a threat at all, right? To belabor the Ellsbury point, he's more talented than Pierre was and still couldn't really produce this season.
Posted by: Not Joe Morgan | October 30, 2008 at 02:01 PM
not joe morgan: it isn't worth arguing with him. He's in love with those two.
Posted by: scribbletone | October 30, 2008 at 02:40 PM
not joe morgan: it isn't worth arguing with him. He's in love with those two.
Posted by: scribbletone | October 30, 2008 at 02:43 PM
Not in love with either just don't see the point in bringing in a 36 yr old CF w/o seeing what you have in those two young players. If healthy our offense is good enough to carry a week bat in case they struggle. Not saying ride with them for the entire season but at least give him a shot. Unless your going to get an all-star caliber player then why spend 10 mil for a mediocre upgrade?
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | October 30, 2008 at 08:28 PM
So give Gardner a shot like we gave Melky a shot last year? Then what? Mike Cameron isn't available in June or July or whenever you realize that Gardner is not a playoff starting CF unless you're now willing to move prospects to get him.
Posted by: Not Joe Morgan | October 30, 2008 at 09:51 PM
THIS SHOULD BE STARTING LINEUP 2009
CF SIZEMORE
2B JETER
RF MANNY RAMERIZ
SS AROD
LF NADY
C POSADA
1B TEXSERIA
DH MATSUI
2B CANO
BENCH PLAYERS
GARDENER
JACKSON AUSTIN
DEREK LEE
STARTING PITCHING
SABBATHIA
WANG
BURNETT
PETTITE
HUGHES
MUSSINA
BULLPEN
RIVERA
JOBA
COOKE
MARTE
BRUNEY
AVEDES
RAMERIEZ EDWAR
IF YOU WANT TO WIN THIS IS HOW
Posted by: yankfan4life | November 01, 2008 at 07:28 AM