![]() |
|
|
| |
« Stark's Non-Tender Candidates | Main | Brian Fuentes Rumors: Thursday »
9:56:
2:38pm: Tim Brown and Gordon Edes talked to involved execs (not with the Angels) who believe the Boras camp is "using the media to ratchet up the price beyond what any team had actually offered."
Brown and Edes say the Angels were told the Red Sox and Nationals offered eight years at about $20MM per. The Angels don't want to do an eighth year, so they'll look into trades for Jermaine Dye, Paul Konerko, and possibly Adrian Beltre. Raul Ibanez is the top free agent backup plan.
Brown and Edes believe Boras could insist on an opt-out clause in a deal with the Nationals.
8:59am: Mike DiGiovanna says the Angels "are believed to be willing to offer at least seven years for something in the $160-million range" for Tex.
8:51am: Jon Heyman says the Yankees have re-entered the Teixeira sweepstakes.
2:40am: Summing up the reported offers made to Mark Teixeira:
By the way, Joe Haggerty transcribed the full Scott Boras talk from yesterday at his site.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e20105365b1722970c
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Mark Teixeira Rumors: Thursday:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
Just sign with the red sox already.
Posted by: NedCollettiClueless | December 11, 2008 at 02:50 AM
If that is really what the Nationals are offering him than I expect Teixeira to be playing for them next season.
Posted by: Jeter96 | December 11, 2008 at 03:02 AM
This might sound a little too simple, but if every offer that we hear of is at $20 million a year, shouldn't the first team to go higher than an average salary of $20 million to get him?
Manny Ramirez was getting $20 million in his deal with the Red Sox, and he opted out because he thought he could do better. Six years from now, Teixeria could be underpaid at $20 million a season. Boras should be getting him something like 6 years/$140 million.
Posted by: Gstill45 | December 11, 2008 at 06:30 AM
he would be a fool to go to the orioles or the nats. It would be like being back in a rangers uniform. red sox need to ante up.
Posted by: atheleticsNbraves | December 11, 2008 at 06:47 AM
"he would be a fool to go to the orioles or the nats. It would be like being back in a rangers uniform. red sox need to ante up."
You mean the way that AJ Burnett would be a fool to sign with the Braves when he can play for the Yankees?
Posted by: Daphne | December 11, 2008 at 06:55 AM
Yes, just like that actually.
Posted by: ... Like a Ham Sandwich! | December 11, 2008 at 07:27 AM
i hope he signs with the Nats.
Posted by: philsWSchamps | December 11, 2008 at 07:38 AM
I'm a big time Angles fan but I feel sorry for the Nats, I kind of hope they get him.
Posted by: dchillis | December 11, 2008 at 08:21 AM
The Braves are infinitely better than the Orioles or Nationals. That's not comparable.
Posted by: kswissreject | December 11, 2008 at 08:32 AM
Dchillis you call yourself a big angels fan then you realize the Angels cant let Tex get a way in my opinion would be a disappointment for the organization for years to come. I just hope the Angels pony up and give him that eight year I mean they overpayed for overrated players such as tori hunter and gary matthews why not spend a little bit more for a good player. I say the Angels have to offer Tex
8 years $170 million
Posted by: angels fan | December 11, 2008 at 08:40 AM
yeah I know your right about that but just feeling bad about teams that try to sign big time players just to have major markets swoop in and gobble them up. But sure I'd love to see Tex back in a Angels jersey, well maybe the Nats can get Manny lol
Posted by: dchillis | December 11, 2008 at 08:48 AM
Oh course the Yankees have entered. They have unlimited amount of money.
Posted by: AvidBravesFan | December 11, 2008 at 08:55 AM
if the yanks sign tex along with burnett and lowe, i will not watch baseball ever again.
Posted by: lilray4000 | December 11, 2008 at 08:58 AM
Go get em Cash!!
Posted by: EastCoastie | December 11, 2008 at 08:58 AM
Seeing him sign with the Nats or O's is like watching Miguel Tejada sign with the O's and A-Rod the Rangers.. just why?
I love Tex and am a Yankee fan but I think if Boston gets him it'll be good for the rivalry that seems to have died out over the last 2 seasons..
I bet they are just saying the Yanks are interested to drive up his price.. I don't see us making a hard push for him.. but prove me wrong Cash
Posted by: ImAwesome | December 11, 2008 at 08:59 AM
If the yankees sign him baseball as it's self would be dead to me!
Posted by: whitesox4life | December 11, 2008 at 09:00 AM
Get it done Cash!
Posted by: yankeegirl49 | December 11, 2008 at 09:01 AM
braves fans relax. this should be good news for you. Maybe their focus on Tex let's you get Burnett. So stop whining, please.
Posted by: philsWSchamps | December 11, 2008 at 09:01 AM
Why would baseball even be fun to watch?
Posted by: whitesox4life | December 11, 2008 at 09:04 AM
braves fans relax. this should be good news for you. Maybe their focus on Tex let's you get Burnett. So stop whining, please.
Posted by: philsWSchamps | December 11, 2008 at 09:01 AM
Not Whining, stating a point. Do you really think that if they get tex they wont have room for burnett as well? Lets face it, they can get whoever they want and spend as much as they want and MLB wont say a damn thing.
Posted by: AvidBravesFan | December 11, 2008 at 09:04 AM
I like how several media outlets have the Red Sox as the frontrunners to get Tex and they haven't even made an offer yet.
Posted by: tolo316 | December 11, 2008 at 09:05 AM
Yanks are going to need a bailout after this on.
Posted by: DominicanYanks | December 11, 2008 at 09:05 AM
Didn't we find out during the Soriano signing that California teams are unable by law to offer contracts beyond 7 years? I seem to remember this from the Soriano contract from 2 years ago -- the Cubs offered 8 years, which the Dodgers could not legally match.
Posted by: CubsAddictMG | December 11, 2008 at 09:05 AM
The yankees have the money that came off the books this year to go and get Tex... CC, Tex, Sheets, and burnett is NOT out of the question.
This still wouldnt add up to the 88mil that just came off the books!
Posted by: EastCoastie | December 11, 2008 at 09:06 AM
"Do you really think that if they get tex they wont have room for burnett as well? Lets face it, they can get whoever they want and spend as much as they want and MLB wont say a damn thing."
MLB cant say a thing. The MLBPA is one of the strongest unions in the country, MLB can go on record as much as they want, but unless there is union buy in on a cap, it makes no difference.
Posted by: yankeegirl49 | December 11, 2008 at 09:08 AM
GET this guy cash!!... Just do it!!
Posted by: EastCoastie | December 11, 2008 at 09:09 AM
"The Braves are infinitely better than the Orioles or Nationals. That's not comparable."
Really? What is your definition of "infinitely better". The Braves I know of were ONCE an infinitely better team than most, but that hasn't been so much the case recently.
Posted by: Daphne | December 11, 2008 at 09:15 AM
Good thing the people of NY coughed up $850 million to subsidize that stadium. Otherwise the Yankee organization might not have been able to reach the half-billion dollar payroll they apparently covet.
Posted by: fapelbon | December 11, 2008 at 09:16 AM
Sign Tex, you'll have world series number 27.
Posted by: mdmonline | December 11, 2008 at 09:19 AM
I really don't understand all of these "fans" in here. If the Orioles or the Nationals sign him, that should be a good thing. Every team has the right to become respectable. I hope most teams are respectable. That will make the game better. Having several doormats in MLB is a black eye on the league.
Posted by: Shane | December 11, 2008 at 09:24 AM
half billion? really?
come on now fapelbon, dont turn on us, you stayed very intelegent yesterday in the discussions, dont ruin it.
Posted by: EastCoastie | December 11, 2008 at 09:24 AM
EastCoastie:
Hyperbole
–noun Rhetoric.
1. obvious and intentional exaggeration.
2. an extravagant statement or figure of speech not intended to be taken literally, as “to wait an eternity.”
Posted by: fapelbon | December 11, 2008 at 09:27 AM
i know what you meant,
no need to pull out your websters...
but just dont get crazy
Posted by: EastCoastie | December 11, 2008 at 09:29 AM
"You mean the way that AJ Burnett would be a fool to sign with the Braves when he can play for the Yankees?"
Maybe if you havent read my other comments on this page when I said IF I WAS BURNETT i would sign wit the yankees instead of the braves. After ive been sayin they shouldnt have even bothered going after the big FA players knowing the yankees were going after every pitcher.
braves fans relax. this should be good news for you. Maybe their focus on Tex let's you get Burnett. So stop whining, please.
Posted by: philsWSchamps | December 11, 2008 at 09:01 AM
not every brave fan is whining but most fans that arent yankees are.
Posted by: atheleticsNbraves | December 11, 2008 at 09:32 AM
Daphne,
The Braves last won the division in 2005 and finished 3rd in the division in 2006 and 2007 with a winning record in 2007.
Baltimore hasn't finished better than 4th in their division since 2004 and hasn't finished with a winning record since 1997.
Montreal hasn't finished better than 4th since 2002 and hasn't finished with a winning record since 2003.
Do you really not see a huge difference there?
Posted by: nixa37 | December 11, 2008 at 09:32 AM
philsWSchamps,
You claim that you don't look to tweak Braves, yet you tell Braves fans in this thread they need to stop whining...mind pointing out the Braves fans that were whining when you posted that?
Posted by: nixa37 | December 11, 2008 at 09:34 AM
As a Yankee fan you would rather have this guy go to the Red Sox?! I love the rivalry as much as the next guy, but Tex going to the Red Sox would be a Devastating blow to us. We lost Abreu & Giambi. How are we going to match the production lost? I am not saying I want them back, but we were terrible hitting in the Clutch. Tex would be that kind of guy who could fill up that huge hole. Plus the only reason the red Sox lost this year is because they didn't have that kind of guy. Even with our Better pitching staff, if we couldn't give them run support. We are going to lose
Posted by: theBabe666 | December 11, 2008 at 09:37 AM
Cash wakes up
calls Scott Boras
"Hey how about Tex for 180/8 with an opt out after 4 years"
deal.
Trade Nady for prospect.
27 in the bag.
Posted by: jaydestro | December 11, 2008 at 09:37 AM
I'm sorry, but an 8-10 year deal isn't very smart for ANY team. You just don't know what your needs will be that far ahead of time, or what kind of player you'll have at the end of the deal. See Helton, Todd.
The Rockies would love to trade Atkins, but can't, because they don't know what they'll have out of Helton.
I cannot understand how a mid-market team like Washington or Baltimore can put that much payroll into one guy. You might put some butts in seats, but not for long if the team doesn't win. One player alone won't do that. Didn't Baltimore learn their lesson with Tejada?
The Yankees got themselves into trouble by collecting a bunch of big name, no heart players at the cost of a core of gritty ballplayers. I'm glad to see they've learned their lesson.
Posted by: bweav44 | December 11, 2008 at 09:40 AM
What many are ignoring regarding the Nats is that the D.C. area is a big market region - it's not NY or LA but it's far bigger than most other teams' areas, including Baltimore. Washington's franchise is just getting started but it will be a major player going forward, with revenues comparable to most of the non-NY teams considered high revenue areas. Boras and Teixera surely realize this.
Posted by: Vincent | December 11, 2008 at 09:42 AM
Vincent: We had a discussion on blog yesterday. If you look at both the AL East and NL East, do you honestly think that Tex wants to sign for doormats. Both divisions are strong in their respective leagues. Personally, the rich will get richer. It bascially Tex's choice.
Personally, I'd like to sign with the Halos.
Yankees fans: How do you like your 2009 season seat prices this year? Yikes!
Posted by: tbone88 | December 11, 2008 at 09:47 AM
my ticket prices arent going up much, because i never sat in the expensive seats anyway.
Posted by: jaydestro | December 11, 2008 at 09:53 AM
new york entering the sweepstakes...they can outbid anyone no doubt but it depends if tex wants to stay closer to home or go for the money. If they make him an offer he cant refuse, just give the yankkes the world series already.
with a possible rotation of
CC
Wang
Burnett
Chamberlain
Lowe
and a lineup of
LF: damon
CF: cameron (if rumor is true)
RF:Swisher
SS: jeter
3b: a-rod
2b: cano
1b: tex
c: posada
dh:manny ramirez??
can anyone out pitch/slug this team?
Posted by: kingfelix93 | December 11, 2008 at 09:57 AM
Even if the Yankees put that team on the field (which I doubt), they won't win titles IMO. The only ones with heart on that team are Jeter and Rivera.
The All-Star team experiment has failed for almost a decade. They smartest thing they did was finally put money into a young, dominant front of the rotation starter.
Posted by: bweav44 | December 11, 2008 at 10:10 AM
its great to see people who arent yankee fans get pissed off at the money being spent as if its theirs... the yankees lost abreu, giambi, and mussina to name only a few, why is it so unfair that they decide to replace them. its not like they stock the bench with 100 million dollar players
Posted by: jp | December 11, 2008 at 10:13 AM
kingfelix: Gonna go out on a limb and guess that was supposed to be parody? Especially with a name that would indicate you're a Seattle fan...
Posted by: gfulla | December 11, 2008 at 10:13 AM
jp: Sabathia and Texeira are not replacements for Abreu, Giambi and Mussina, they're massive upgrades.
Posted by: gfulla | December 11, 2008 at 10:14 AM
gfulla.. i understand they are upgrades imo too but they lose a 20 game winner finally and 2 old but productive at least players in the lineup. with 88mil off the pay roll and obvious holes i just dont see what the fuss is about. so theyve signed one big pitcher, maybe another soon if burnett picks them and a possible run at texiera to replace giambi
Posted by: jp | December 11, 2008 at 10:19 AM
beweav44: That's why we play the games. The Yankees can field an all-star lineup every year. In the end, it's still 8 years and counting since their last WS title.
Keep the drought going!
Posted by: tbone88 | December 11, 2008 at 10:25 AM
The issue is that if they get Sabathia, Texeira and Burnett...then they just went out and bought the three best free agents in a great free agent class. There are 29 other teams in baseball...that would just be ridiculous. Not to mention reports now that even if they sign Burnett they're still interested in Lowe too.
I've honestly never cared quite as much as most about the fact the Yankees have a ridiculously high payroll, but something like that would simply be infuriating for fans of every other team.
I'm at a loss for why you can't understand that response.
Posted by: gfulla | December 11, 2008 at 10:26 AM
According to Colin Cowherd:
Nats Offer: 10 yrs 200 million
O's Offer: 9 yrs 180 million
BoSox: less (?)
Teix will probably take less to go to the BoSox.
He didn't name any sources, and I certainly hadn't heard those numbers until today. Is there something I don't know?
Posted by: nckdmss | December 11, 2008 at 10:28 AM
I'm posting this here because it relates to the Nats, but MLB's winter meetings blog says the Nats picked up Terrell Young (RHP) from the Reds in the Rule 5 Draft.
http://hotstove.mlblogs.com/archives/2008/12/rule_5_top_pick.html
Posted by: Sasskuash | December 11, 2008 at 10:29 AM
Correction: the blog says the Nats WILL take Terrell Young, not that they have taken him (the Rule 5 draft hasn't started yet)
Posted by: Sasskuash | December 11, 2008 at 10:33 AM
gfulla... i understand your point, and if i wasnt a yankee fan id prob see it better your way but i kind of feel like it coincidence that they happen to need first base and starting pitching this year when it happens to be a pretty good free agaent class for those needs. i think any team who had those holes and money would go after these guys. i dont know that i would call it trying to take the top 3 players regardless i think they have a plan and money to execute it
Posted by: jp | December 11, 2008 at 10:37 AM
Please Angels ... just don't do it. 7/160 is way too much for Tex. Let him toil in Washington if all he cares about is money.
Posted by: bjsguess | December 11, 2008 at 10:43 AM
Judging by the assortment of offers unless the angels get tricked into a fake bidding war Teixeira is going to sign for less than people thought. Right now it looks like 7-160 is about the highest it will go and I think he signs for a little less with a contender if the angels keep their cool.
Posted by: walkoffblast | December 11, 2008 at 11:13 AM
The Yankees have "re-entered" the sweepstakes?
I am not one to care about the Yankees spending money freely but if they truly are in on Teixeira and considering Burnett too; well thats just down right mind-boggling that anyone has this much money.
As a fan of the game first, I'd like to see MLB implement rules regarding payroll increases as they correlate to ticket price increases.
I think investing in your club to try and win is fine ownerrship(s) aren't passing on disproportionate amounts of the added cost onto the fans.
Not sure how it would get done, but I think at some point MLB is going to need to step in and implement some kind of elements which remind the common fan that they still care about them too.
Afterall, "the stone age didn't end because they ran out of stones."
Posted by: KangarooBoxer26 | December 11, 2008 at 11:32 AM
Kangaroo,
you probably arent aware that the yankees lost alot of payroll from players becoming free agents, so they have plenty of money to spend and they may not even have their payroll as high as it was last year.
Posted by: bozbot | December 11, 2008 at 11:54 AM
bozbot,
Yankees did shed some payroll as Mussina/Pettite/Giambi and Abreu are all gone; however they are in theory discussing replacing each of these salaries with greater salaries.
Obviously a lot would have to come to pass with the Yanks landing all these free agents.
However, I guess my comments were more out of pure frustration for baseball as a whole and not specifically targeted at the Yankees.
I really don't mind when teams spend money but I think the numbers being discussed this offseason for so many players is simply bad for the game.
Can you imagine the Nationals spending $180 million on Teixeira and then having to raise their ticket prices by 10%-20% when they will still (by most arguments) be fielding a losing product for the next few years?
The Red Sox have been raising their ticket prices disproportionately as well ever since they won in 2004. Their payroll has not gone up drastically at all since then yet prices are inflating at a rate that far outweighs normal day-day inflation and outweighs payroll increases.
To put it simply: this offseason has the potential to be bad for baseball as it appears the increases in player salaries is spiking larger then usual, yet the common fan is struggling at the same time.
I would hate to see fans become disenchanted with the game; because that is not good for anyone.
Posted by: KangarooBoxer26 | December 11, 2008 at 12:33 PM
It's too early to say that salaries are spiking across the board.
The Yankees said before free agency started that they were going to top Santana's contract for CC. KRod and Wood signed what could be considered lower contracts than closers past.
Beyond AJ, Lowe and Tex, most guys are probably going to get less than they thought.
I agree that this offseason and season in general could be bad for baseball, but I don't think it's going to be payroll increases from 08 to 09 that'll cause that.
Ticket sales and especially corporate sponsorship will have a much greater impact IMO.
Posted by: bweav44 | December 11, 2008 at 12:56 PM
The Red Sox will offer 8 years, $180MM.
Posted by: rememberthecoop | December 11, 2008 at 01:02 PM
I don't see why the O's would be such a bad option for Tex. A lineup w/
1)Roberts
2)Markakis
3)Tex
4)Huff
5)Weiters
6)Jones
looks pretty darn good. And with the pitching prospects the O's have coming up in a year or two, this team can be a serious contender. He would be joining an organization that looks to be increasingly competent where he can be the face of the team in a city that loves him.
Posted by: HolyO's | December 11, 2008 at 01:46 PM
Don't forget about Scott who's a decent hitter, and Montanez, who might become a great hitter as well. Even Mora isn't that bad. If we get tex then we can get roberts and markakis to sign extentions too. Then we can focus on Starting pitching
Posted by: Baltimore O's Fan | December 11, 2008 at 02:29 PM
Cash dont let the red sox's get tex. We need him more then them, so get him.But this just proves the red sox's are just like the yankees in buying all their players. Red sox's dont need a first basement so they deicde to get him just to make their team better.
Posted by: yanks12025 | December 11, 2008 at 02:31 PM
Yankees need a 1B, they need a bat, they need a defensive upgrade. Tex solves all these. Make it happen Cashman.
Posted by: C.K. | December 11, 2008 at 02:46 PM
I hope Tim Brown is wrong.
Posted by: AFROTC Cadet | December 11, 2008 at 02:48 PM
Ya O's fan, I think we're kidding ourselves by saying Montanez might become a "great hitter" or that Mora isn't bad, but we would have the core pieces of a good lineup that we can build around with some low key free agents and some decent prospects. I am worried that this would put to much stock on our pitching prospects though... we wouldn't have the money to pursue any real pitchers if we do get Tex by some stroke of luck.
Posted by: HolyO's | December 11, 2008 at 02:49 PM
That translates to:
"Tex probably wants to go to the Angels, and now Boras is trying to get the most money possible."
I, for one, and not worried, and I think the Angels have a very strong chance to land Tex.
Posted by: bseballcrzy17 | December 11, 2008 at 02:50 PM
Yes, PLEASE take Konerko off our hands.
Posted by: astralpanda | December 11, 2008 at 02:51 PM
I would definately rather have the Angels sign Dunn then even have them think about trading for Konerko.
Posted by: AFROTC Cadet | December 11, 2008 at 02:52 PM
and I'm sure the Konerko/Ibanez/Dye rumors are ALL speculation from writers... it's not the Angels style to tell people what they're doing, which is why we haven't heard of an offer for Teixeira.
They go about things very quietly in Anaheim...
Posted by: bseballcrzy17 | December 11, 2008 at 02:53 PM
It's okay astralpanda, you can keep him we INSIST!
Posted by: AFROTC Cadet | December 11, 2008 at 02:54 PM
BadVlad -
so would I, and i think he's probably high on their list.
Posted by: bseballcrzy17 | December 11, 2008 at 02:54 PM
HEY TIM!!
check out Rosenthal's blog.. Angels are going after Peavy
Posted by: bseballcrzy17 | December 11, 2008 at 02:55 PM
"Cash dont let the red sox's get tex. We need him more then them, so get him.But this just proves the red sox's are just like the yankees in buying all their players. Red sox's dont need a first basement so they deicde to get him just to make their team better."
Wait, so the Yankees swooping in last minute and attempting to blow even other large market teams out of the water to sign literally every single one of the big name free agents of this offseason makes the Red Sox and Yankees similar?
If anything, it would solidify the fact that the Yankees spend WAY too much money if they can bring themselves to top the kind of offers being talked about for Tex while signing guys like Sabathia, Lowe and Burnett at the same time. We're talking somewhere in the neighborhood of potentially making over half a billion dollars in commitments in one offseason in a down economy. That is beyond excessive.
That said, I don't buy it. All inside of one day we've got reports that:
A. "Sources" say the Yankees have seriously reentered the bidding.
B. Boras is spreading BS in the media in an attempt to drive up the bidding price.
If those two things aren't related, I will be genuinely surprised.
Posted by: 0bsessions | December 11, 2008 at 02:55 PM
Who keeps deleting my posts?
Posted by: astralpanda | December 11, 2008 at 02:58 PM
Nevermind, I must have missed sometihng
Posted by: astralpanda | December 11, 2008 at 02:58 PM
No way the Yankees end up with Tex,their focus is on pitching and their likely getting ready to hand out another big contract to Burnett...The Angels should just sign Adam Dunn to play 1B,he's much better then Konerko and he gurantees you 40 homers a year.
Posted by: JT89 | December 11, 2008 at 02:59 PM
Boras want to milk every penny from these teams.
Posted by: DominicanYanks | December 11, 2008 at 03:00 PM
0bsessions,
The part of my post was supposed to be if the red sox's were to sign Tex, because you add his 22 million a year and then you resign Tek your looking at around a $160 million dollar payroll. The yankees wont be far from that this year.
Posted by: yanks12025 | December 11, 2008 at 03:03 PM
JT89, a lot of people think the Yanks only need pitching, but they actually need hitting right now. Last year their offence wasn't very good and they need to bring someone who will replace Abreu's and Giambi's #s. Their ERA in 08 was better than in 07. Injuries and an inconsistent offence screw their season, but they still won 89.
A few years back the miss on Beltran, I don't think they should do the same thing againg with Tex. who will hot behind A-rod? they need another hitter.
Posted by: DominicanYanks | December 11, 2008 at 03:06 PM
Also we can add pitching and still sign Tex. Burnett is trash and i dont know why we are wasting are time with him and also with Lowe. I would rather go with Ben Sheets for 2 years and bring back Andy for 1 and also give Hughes one more try.
Also has Peavy said he does not want to come to NY. I thought i seen we were on his list he would approve a trade to but now i hear he would not want to go to NY.
Posted by: yanks12025 | December 11, 2008 at 03:07 PM
"if the red sox's were to sign Tex, because you add his 22 million a year and then you resign Tek your looking at around a $160 million dollar payroll."
not sure about your estimate. Tex just replace manny's 20 million option money to a first approximation.
Posted by: 080808 | December 11, 2008 at 03:18 PM
disclaimer...
I am a Nats fan
I can't stand the Lerners
I can't stand Jim Bowden even more...
The Nats have got to do something. With Tex there is hope...if the Rays can get to the summit so can the Nats...I hope.
Posted by: Andrew | December 11, 2008 at 03:19 PM
"0bsessions,
The part of my post was supposed to be if the red sox's were to sign Tex, because you add his 22 million a year and then you resign Tek your looking at around a $160 million dollar payroll. The yankees wont be far from that this year."
Ah, then you're missing a lot of info on this. The Sox had a 2008 payroll of $133 million, over $70 million less than that of the Yankees, and that includes Manny's shed salary. All told, between Manny, Schilling, Timlin and various others clearing off the payroll, the Sox shed a hair under $40 million from the books. They've also shed Crisp's contract. Right now, as they are currently made up, the Sox have a payroll of $95 million dollars (Most recent breakdown here: http://www.sonsofsamhorn.net/wiki/index.php/Red_Sox_Contract_Status).
If they sign Teixeira to an 8 year, $160 million dollar contract and Tek to a two year, $15 million contract (Which is probably easily the best he'll do), that still only brings them to $130, which is what the Yankees were at even before they signed Sabathia, after all their free agents were cut from the salary estimates. If all estimates and presumptions are true, they'll land Burnett at $85 for five and Lowe at about $60 for four, which puts that a full $50 million over the Sox for next season, which is less than they were over the Sox last year, but still a pretty sizable difference. If they sign Tex and the Sox don't, that puts the difference between the Yankees and the Sox at about $90 million dollars, which is more than over half of the MLB's total payrolls.
Posted by: 0bsessions | December 11, 2008 at 03:30 PM
Ok,
I looked at the wrong number.
Posted by: yanks12025 | December 11, 2008 at 03:32 PM
tolo316: "I like how several media outlets have the Red Sox as the frontrunners to get Tex and they haven't even made an offer yet."
How do you know? Theo has fewer leaks than the CIA.
Posted by: Little Bear | December 11, 2008 at 03:35 PM
disclaimer...
I am a Nats fan
I can't stand the Lerners
I can't stand Jim Bowden even more...
The Nats have got to do something. With Tex there is hope...if the Rays can get to the summit so can the Nats...I hope.
Posted by: Andrew | December 11, 2008 at 03:19 PM
AMEN!
We need a franchise player and Tex fits the bill. If we got him and a veteran pitcher...I think we'd be pretty decent. At least better than last year.
1) Hernandez 2B
2) Guzman SS
3) Tex 1B
4) Zimmerman 3B
5) Milledge OF
6) Flores C
7) Willingham OF
8) Kearns/Pena/Dukes OF
9) Pitcher's Spot
SP John Lannan
SP Scott Olsen
SP Veteran Guy
SP Tim Redding
SP Balester/Bergmann/Martis/Strasburg (I can dream, right?)/Hill
Bullpen's a mess now but only guaranteed people are Hanrahan and Rivera.
Definitely better than last year.
Posted by: DCSportsGuy | December 11, 2008 at 03:36 PM
DominicanYanks: "Yanks are going to need a bailout after this on."
They already have a bailout. The city is paying for part of the stadium and MLB has stopped making them pay the luxury tax.
Posted by: Little Bear | December 11, 2008 at 03:37 PM
"How do you know? Theo has fewer leaks than the CIA."
Pretty much the only way they can keep him around. Lucchino had to practically padlock Edes and his CHB out of the building to get Theo to come back. Shouldn't have been as hard a choice to make as it was, either.
Posted by: 0bsessions | December 11, 2008 at 03:39 PM
Little Bear you are right. I actually read about it in the newspaper.
Posted by: DominicanYanks | December 11, 2008 at 03:44 PM
As much as I'd love to have Tex back in Anaheim I really starting to warm up the thought of picking up Dunn, trading Figgy & a PTBNL for A-Ram, and then signing Peavy...
Posted by: Burtis | December 11, 2008 at 03:46 PM
yanks12025: "But this just proves the red sox's are just like the yankees in buying all their players."
How so? Since Theo has been GM, the Sox have only awarded two FA contracts that exceed $40 million over the life of the contract. The Yankees may beat that this week alone.
Posted by: Little Bear | December 11, 2008 at 03:57 PM
Yanks12025: "The part of my post was supposed to be if the red sox's were to sign Tex, because you add his 22 million a year and then you resign Tek your looking at around a $160 million dollar payroll."
Not sure where you get that. The Sox were somewhere around $133 million. Tex just replaces Manny. Tek replaces himself. Then they are still lower than last year because of Schilling, Coco, Timlin, and Tavarez being off the books.
Posted by: Little Bear | December 11, 2008 at 04:05 PM
It dont matter how big a contract is. Buying players means how many players you buy compared to how many home grown players that you put out their.
Posted by: yanks12025 | December 11, 2008 at 04:05 PM
You cannot seriously be talking about buying players when your team just offered 2 years and 60 million more than the next highest offer for CC.
Give it a break at least for a week.
Posted by: Kenan and Kel | December 11, 2008 at 04:14 PM
DC, that's one horrible looking team. Tex is the "one of these doesn't belong".
Bowden set my Reds back several years, and now he's done it to the Nats too. How many crappy OF's can one team collect? It looks like all the crappy RB's on my fantasy football team!
If Olsen is your #2, have fun trying to lose less than 100 in 09.
Posted by: bweav44 | December 11, 2008 at 04:18 PM
Kenan and Kel,
I never said that the yankees dont buy players.
Posted by: yanks12025 | December 11, 2008 at 04:20 PM
yanks1225: "It dont matter how big a contract is."
So, really, getting a backup catcher for a $400K, one year contract is the same as getting an ace pitcher for $161 million for 7 years. Glad you cleared that up for me.
Posted by: Little Bear | December 11, 2008 at 04:22 PM
Hes going to the sox for 8yrs 160 million because sox have the perfect mix of east coast, money, and a winning team. If the Nats want tex they need to go above and beyond whatever the sox offer
Posted by: Reality Check | December 11, 2008 at 04:30 PM