![]() |
|
|
| |
« Odds and Ends: Andruw, Marquis, Coonelly | Main | Cardinals Sign Royce Ring »
TUESDAY, 11:17am: Phillies GM Ruben Amaro Jr. says he's not dead set on replacing Romero with another lefty reliever. The team has interest in several free agent relievers.
MONDAY, 9:26pm: The Philadelphia Phillies might need to pick up some help for their bullpen after reliever J.C. Romero found out he has been suspended 50 games by Major League Baseball. Fortunately they signed Scott Eyre at the beginning of the offseason.
Romero failed a drug test, though he denies doing anything illegal. The MLB Players Association had told players that the supplement Romero took was acceptable, ESPN.com's Peter Gammons reports.
"I still cannot see where I did something wrong," Romero told Gammons. "There is nothing that should take away from the rings of my teammates. I didn't cheat. I tried to follow the rules."
Gammons notes that Romero will lose $1.25MM. You can read the rest of the drama at ESPN.
The left-handed Romero, 33 in June, was an impact player in the Phillies' bullpen in 2008. He went 4-4 with a 2.75 ERA in 81 appearances (59.0 innings). The Phillies could possibly explore the market for his replacement.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e2010536aca419970b
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Phillies' Romero Suspended 50 Games:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
I saw this one coming
Posted by: Mark Twine | January 05, 2009 at 09:28 PM
Whoa. That's pretty surprising. I hope the newspapers don't go crazy about it though; the steroids problem is overblown. That's a big loss though. Just out of curiosity (and ignorance), is there any chance of false positives on these tests? Because if there are, they should redo all positive tests to verify. Maybe they already do, but I have no idea.
Posted by: NYYanksCaptain23 | January 05, 2009 at 09:29 PM
I'm a Mets fan but I would be really pissed off if I were a Phillies fan. It's a very unfair punishment.
But it helps the Mets, so I'm ok with it.
Posted by: supermets | January 05, 2009 at 09:30 PM
"I still cannot see where I did something wrong"
Let me help you there JC. You went to GNC and bought a supplement. It contained substances that are banned by MLB. You tested postive, and will now be suspended for it.
And to anyone else that plans on mentioning the PA or his nutritionists, he's a big boy. He's responsible for what he puts in his body. Nobody else. He had the opportunity to call the league drug hotline before taking it, and decided not to.
Enjoy the vacation.
Posted by: stellar | January 05, 2009 at 09:30 PM
The tester points to the needle marks on his arms. "what are those?"
Romero rubs his neck: Oh I just injuct flinstone vitemins into myself for nutrients.
Tester points to Balcos phone # on JCs phone: why you callin him?
JC: that make the best fred ones if you ask me. look im innocent. I didnt see whats so bad about taking Flinstone vitimens,i tried to follow the rules.
Posted by: ballerwhiteboy | January 05, 2009 at 09:32 PM
How dumb can you be
Posted by: Tough | January 05, 2009 at 09:32 PM
"And to anyone else that plans on mentioning the PA or his nutritionists, he's a big boy. He's responsible for what he puts in his body. Nobody else. He had the opportunity to call the league drug hotline before taking it, and decided not to."
Really? The PA said specifically that the substance he took was legal.
Posted by: supermets | January 05, 2009 at 09:32 PM
this is really shocking... I've always watched JC pitch since his days with the Angels. He had talent, but if this is how he was obtaining his talent, then it really is a shame
Posted by: Angelsx3714 | January 05, 2009 at 09:32 PM
Takashi Saito makes a lot of sense for the Phils. If he works out, they have the best bullpen in the NL. If he gets injured, they have Romero back anyway.
Posted by: surfacetear | January 05, 2009 at 09:33 PM
"Really? The PA said specifically that the substance he took was legal."
So what? They were wrong. Since when is the PA the drug knowledge master?
Again... the league has a HUGE resource to avoid these kinds of problems. He chose not to use it.
Posted by: stellar | January 05, 2009 at 09:33 PM
Great post, stellar.
Posted by: PJH | January 05, 2009 at 09:34 PM
BTW, Ben Jones: you should really post more of the story. What you posted makes it look like Romero is an idiot and can't tell how he messed up. You should post the part about why it is controversial.
Posted by: supermets | January 05, 2009 at 09:34 PM
@ Ballerwhiteboy:
Next time you try to write something funny, make sure it's actually funny.
Posted by: tolo316 | January 05, 2009 at 09:34 PM
"So what? They were wrong. Since when is the PA the drug knowledge master?
Again... the league has a HUGE resource to avoid these kinds of problems. He chose not to use it."
He obviously made a mistake. He probably should have asked the hotline. But it's really the PA's fault. They shouldn't be telling the players something that is the opposite of the truth.
Posted by: supermets | January 05, 2009 at 09:36 PM
i like how mark is the 1st post.....
why is it a 1 million dollar fine? that seems like alot, and doesnot say why it is that much
Posted by: Buzz Meat | January 05, 2009 at 09:36 PM
...yeah, and Rafael Palmiero hasn't "corked his bat" with Viagra either.
Posted by: abcrazy4dodgers | January 05, 2009 at 09:36 PM
Yes, he made a mistake. Now he'll pay the price.
Yes, the PA screwed up as well. However, they aren't the experts. Why would he even bother asking them? The only opinion that matters is the league's.
Posted by: stellar | January 05, 2009 at 09:37 PM
@Buzz: He wasn't fined. He lost 1.25 million of his salary(probably ~1/3) because he is out for 50 games.
Posted by: supermets | January 05, 2009 at 09:37 PM
If you wanna call him out on anything, stellar, you oughta be calling out how he went to get a "second opinion" on the substance. And while, yeah, you can say he should've tried the hotline, the PA is a brute force for the players, and there's really no reason for him to not trust what they say.
Regardless though, this thing looks messy. I'm not pinning this solely on JC.
Posted by: JohnKruksWaistLine | January 05, 2009 at 09:38 PM
"Yes, the PA screwed up as well. However, they aren't the experts. Why would he even bother asking them? The only opinion that matters is the league's."
He didn't ask them. They sent a letter to the players saying that 3 specific substances were legal. If they told me that, I would believe them.
Posted by: supermets | January 05, 2009 at 09:39 PM
gotta go with supermets on this one, the post doesn't do jc any justice. seems kinda like hes gettin screwed over by mlb
Posted by: dvarno | January 05, 2009 at 09:39 PM
this help the NL East alot
he was one of the best setup man to a closer who never blown a save
not to mention ryan madison success
Posted by: marlinsman1120 | January 05, 2009 at 09:40 PM
ok i was thinking he made less than that, ok so my guess was right on what that money was from
Posted by: Buzz Meat | January 05, 2009 at 09:41 PM
"this help the NL East alot
he was one of the best setup man to a closer who never blown a save"
Actually he walked in runs in the beginning of the year, he got the wins when it mattered the most WORLD SERIES!
Posted by: Buzz Meat | January 05, 2009 at 09:42 PM
I don't exactly remember the number but he's making 3 or so million a year. And he wasn't the setup man for most of last year; that role got taken/assumed/whatever by Madson. But this still hurts the bullpen.
Posted by: JohnKruksWaistLine | January 05, 2009 at 09:42 PM
OK so the PA told him it was fine before he bought it. Why then did he find it necessary to run it by his nutritionist, his strength and conditioning coach, and a second nutritionist?
I agree that this isn't a simple case of doping and hoping not to get caught. However, the end result is the same. You are responsible for what you put in your body. It doesn't matter what anyone says about it... only the league. And it seems like that's the one person/entity that he didn't consult with.
Posted by: stellar | January 05, 2009 at 09:44 PM
I agree stellar that Romero should have asked the league. But I also think it is unfair that he was suspended. Why should he receive the same punishment as someone who took steroids hoping they wouldn't get caught.
And the PA should have to pay a portion of the 1.25mil he lost because it's pretty much their fault.
Posted by: supermets | January 05, 2009 at 09:47 PM
as much as i hate the phillies, this is unjust. he should fight mlb and the pa because they clearly fd up and somewhat tricked him
Posted by: clemsontribe24 | January 05, 2009 at 09:49 PM
Maybe the league will eventually differentiate intentional doping with accidental use, but that's quite a cloudy area.
And the PA won't have to pay a dime. Maybe they will because they feel bad, but that's about as far as it will go. They weren't the ones to ask. They should have told him to go right to the league. In the end, it was still JC's call to make.
Posted by: stellar | January 05, 2009 at 09:50 PM
stellar,
you're a joke. Do you even have a clue what happened or are you a mets fan hiding behind this.
At first i was SO pissed off at JC as i felt it would taint out championship. Then when i actually listened to the story as far as what happened, ie when the PA said it was fine and later found out they screwed up, i realize there's nothing wrong.
Also what hasn't been pointed out is that JC was given the oppourtunity to plead guilty to it and have his suspension reduced to 25 games. he refused because he did nothing wrong.
To me this is akin to the NFL's current "diuretic" controvery.
he'll do his time and We'll STILL beat the Mets.
Posted by: philsWSchamps | January 05, 2009 at 09:53 PM
Maybe he should have paid more attention to what he was putting in his body. Whatever he took might not have actually been "Performance Enhancing," but if it was on the no-no list, he should've steered clear.
He got the same punishment everyone else got. Most of the guys nailed before him were minor leaguers (and Mike Cameron), and they all took the 50 games and kept on truckin'. He'll be back in time for the post-allstar push anyway.
Posted by: FineHamAbounds | January 05, 2009 at 09:55 PM
BTW, any Phils fan who jumped on Jordan Schafer when he got nailed for HGH needs to hush up.
Posted by: FineHamAbounds | January 05, 2009 at 09:56 PM
Are you a just Phillies fan trying to justify a key player's illegal drug use?
The PA doesn't decide what's legal and what isn't. It's irrelevant that they told him it was OK. The league decides that, not the PA.
He could have checked with the league, but decided hearing an OK from the PA was good enough.
Pretty cut and dry.
Posted by: stellar | January 05, 2009 at 09:57 PM
illegal drug use huh?
Its not as if he was being shot up by mark Mcgwire here. Get off your high horse. He made the mistake of trusting the PA.
Oh and please don't compare it to HGH use. That's ridiculous.
Posted by: philsWSchamps | January 05, 2009 at 09:59 PM
@Fine: Romero didn't use HGH...
Posted by: supermets | January 05, 2009 at 09:59 PM
Illegal drug use for lack of a better term. Illegal substance consuming. Better?
Yes, he made a mistake trusting the PA. Yes, the PA was wrong in giving him that information. But in the end, everyone is responsible for what they put in their body. And if they don't want to take the time to ask the league, they need to be willing to accept the consequences.
Posted by: stellar | January 05, 2009 at 10:01 PM
2009 World Champion Philadelphia Phillies*
Posted by: nostocksjustbonds | January 05, 2009 at 10:04 PM
He is a health NUT, he isnt going to do illegal stuff on prpose
Posted by: Buzz Meat | January 05, 2009 at 10:06 PM
and he is MORE than willing to accept the consequences. The fact that under this duress he had it in him to win 2 World Series games shows mental toughness. We'll do just fine until he returns more pissed off than ever.
Posted by: philsWSchamps | January 05, 2009 at 10:07 PM
2009 World Champion Philadelphia Phillies*
Posted by: nostocksjustbonds | January 05, 2009 at 10:04 PM
haha. It wasn't the clear you know, LOL!!
Posted by: philsWSchamps | January 05, 2009 at 10:08 PM
Stellar,
What you are failing to realize is that the PA is told what is legal and what isn't legal by THE LEAGUE. Then stuff changed and it was illegal so Romero stopped taking it as soon as he found that out. Stop drowning in your misery of a 2nd straight collapse and realize that whether your a Mets fan or a Phillies fan this isn't right.
Posted by: bmcane08 | January 05, 2009 at 10:08 PM
Apparently he's not willing to accept the consequences when he doesn't even know what he did wrong.
Posted by: stellar | January 05, 2009 at 10:08 PM
This has absolutely nothing to do with team affiliation, so don't bother.
I didn't read that the league informed the PA that this substance was EVER legal. Did you? I'd love a link to that.
Posted by: stellar | January 05, 2009 at 10:10 PM
"We have previously told you there is no reason to believe a supplement bought at a U.S. based retail store could cause you to test positive under our Drug Program.
Stellar,
exactly what about the above do you NOT understand? Did you even read the article? Watch a news report? Take off your David Wright footie pajamas and look at it honestly.
As a Phils fan I am pissed he didn't check with the hotline first and am willing to accept it but am damn proud not only that Romero wouldn't be bullied by the league and had the mental toughness to pitch as well as he did under such duress. He's gonna be so wired when he comes back.
Posted by: philsWSchamps | January 05, 2009 at 10:13 PM
I'm with stellar. It's been clear for the last few years that what you put in your body is your own choice and you have to accept any consequences that come with that decision.
Romero should've asked the league before taking a supplement, that's obvious. And sorry philsWSchamps, he's not a hero for winning the WS while on banned drugs.
Posted by: Prismo | January 05, 2009 at 10:14 PM
"Watch a news report? Take off your David Wright footie pajamas and look at it honestly."
If you want to have a real discussion, I'm all for it. When you start hurling jabs is when people start realizing that you're immature and incapable of having a real discussion.
Posted by: stellar | January 05, 2009 at 10:15 PM
The players association is given a list of substances that are banned by Major League Baseball. They are given that list by the league. They players association uses that list to help players avoid taking banned substances and to help players take legal drugs.
They told Romero this drug was legal, because it was not on the list of banned substances at the time. That is why Romero took it.
Posted by: bmcane08 | January 05, 2009 at 10:16 PM
In fairness to Romero, he stopped taking it as soon as this whole thing came up. It was out of his system for the playoffs.
Posted by: stellar | January 05, 2009 at 10:16 PM
Prismo,
did you even read the article?
"That same day, Oct. 1, Romero was again tested. The results were negative. So for the NLDS, NLCS and World Series, the supplement was no longer in his system
Please read the article before making dumb comments. Let it all come out first because you put him in steroids hall of shame.
Posted by: philsWSchamps | January 05, 2009 at 10:17 PM
"They told Romero this drug was legal, because it was not on the list of banned substances at the time. That is why Romero took it."
If it was that simple, he wouldn't be suspended. There has to be some kind of grace period from the time a drug gets added to the banned list to the time it can no longer be in your system.
I have a feeling we don't have all the details we need to get a clear picture of just what happened.
Posted by: stellar | January 05, 2009 at 10:18 PM
I never said anything about steroids. Enjoy your WS title, but he is in no way a hero because of this, that's just absurd.
Posted by: Prismo | January 05, 2009 at 10:21 PM
He won't be a hero because regardless of the outcome, its not a situation that calls for a hero in one way or another.
But judging Gammons' article on just the facts in the article, it really seems like Romero got the short end of the stick.
I know that Romero deserves a consequence for this, but there needs to be different suspensions for a case like this and a case where someone deliberatly takes HGH and tries to hide it.
Posted by: bmcane08 | January 05, 2009 at 10:25 PM
stellar,
I was simply responding to you asking for a link. It was provided above. If you read the article (not saying you didn't) it would show that the timeline was as such:
as bmcane08 states MLB gives the PA a list of banned substances every year and i'm sure regular updates as it changes regularly.
Prior to the 2008 season MLB gave the list to the PA and stated that "there is no reason to believe a supplement bought at a US based retail store could cause you to test positive under our Drug Program". Then in July Romero bought a supplement, went the extra steps to have it checked by his personal nutritionist who said it was clean. He then double checked it with the Phillies coach who agreed it was clean but suggested to get a second opinion from a seperate nutritionist (THIS IS WHERE HE SHOULD HAVE GONE TO THE HOTLINE). The second nutritionist said it was clean.
There were 3 tests, the first two positive, the last one (i assume since he stopped taking it was negative which meant it wasn't in his system come playoff time).
Unfortunately he got caught in the system and is paying because the PA screwed up. Ya i agree he is responsible for what he puts in his body but please don't make him out to be a drug addict like some are wont to do.
How about the extra testosterone in his system from 2006? Oops, his wife's fertility drugs.
Posted by: philsWSchamps | January 05, 2009 at 10:28 PM
I'm not at all making him out to be a drug addict. I totally agree that he took it while thinking it was legal. i don't think he's a bad guy or anything.
Just want to make that clear.
Posted by: stellar | January 05, 2009 at 10:29 PM
I never said anything about steroids. Enjoy your WS title, but he is in no way a hero because of this, that's just absurd.
Posted by: Prismo | January 05, 2009 at 10:21 PM
I never said he was a "hero", go back and check. What i said was that was pretty amazing that he could focus on pitching lights out while under this stress that we now find out about months later.
Posted by: philsWSchamps | January 05, 2009 at 10:30 PM
This is an interesting case. It doesn't seem that Romero was knowingly taking a banned substance. It is hard to judge him to be guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. People should not be jumping to conclusions about this situation.
The biggest problem here is that the Players Association and MLB need to get their act together so that they both know what substances are allowed and which aren't. There seems to be a lack of communication here, especially with the mid-season change with this substance. The other issue that stands out is who Romero consulted about the supplement. The team trainer Lein should be one of the most knowledgeable sources, he is certified as an athletic trainer and is being employed by the Phillies, it is his job to know what substances are allowable by MLB standards. Romero should not be consulting with any nutritionists that are outside the confines of MLB if they are not experts on the bylines of the MLB drug rules.
Romero deserves to be able to appeal the case if he believes himself to be innocent. In addition the circumstance warrants further investigation to determine where the blame lies in this infraction.
Posted by: Jeff Levy | January 05, 2009 at 10:34 PM
the problem with the whole "you are responsible for what you put in your body" is how would any player know which substances are legal or illegal? half the banned substances list are not performance enhancers but legal drugs that can also be used as masking agents, and therefore are banned.
How is this not how we want players to act? they all take supplements to help them perform every day like we want them to, Romero consulted many people to make sure he wasn't breaking the rules, he was told he was clear, and took the pills. Clearly he never intended to break the rules.
MLB should give a pass here, blaming their own systems, because they should be active in this area, far more active than they clearly are and educating what is and isn't above board.
Posted by: quintjs | January 05, 2009 at 10:36 PM
"The biggest problem here is that the Players Association and MLB need to get their act together so that they both know what substances are allowed and which aren't. There seems to be a lack of communication here, especially with the mid-season change with this substance. The other issue that stands out is who Romero consulted about the supplement. The team trainer Lein should be one of the most knowledgeable sources, he is certified as an athletic trainer and is being employed by the Phillies, it is his job to know what substances are allowable by MLB standards. Romero should not be consulting with any nutritionists that are outside the confines of MLB if they are not experts on the bylines of the MLB drug rules."
Best post so far.
"Romero deserves to be able to appeal the case if he believes himself to be innocent. In addition the circumstance warrants further investigation to determine where the blame lies in this infraction."
He did appeal. The arbitration hearing took place at the beginning of the World Series. ESPN doesn't say what the outcome was, just that the arbitrator changed his mind in December. I guess in October they ruled to dismiss the whole thing?
Posted by: stellar | January 05, 2009 at 10:37 PM
I'm not at all making him out to be a drug addict. I totally agree that he took it while thinking it was legal. i don't think he's a bad guy or anything.
Just want to make that clear.
Posted by: stellar | January 05, 2009 at 10:29 PM
thanks. sorry for jumping down your throat but as you can expect while its totally unwarranted the "cheater" to win a WS comparisons will be coming now.
Posted by: philsWSchamps | January 05, 2009 at 10:38 PM
He checked with his nutritionist, who would work in tandem with the strength coach for obvious reasons. The strength coach suggested that he get a second opinion. Clearly Romero was trying to be cautious before he used the supplement.
That being said, it was a terribly dumb move. If the PA could not give him a definitive answer they should've put him in contact with someone from the league office that could give him the answer.
What's more interesting is that when he purchased the bottle there was no warning, but at the hearing the bottle had the warning on it...
It's unfortunate that he'll have to be reminded of it...the team clearly earned those rings, with or without JC's supplement.
Posted by: Omar's Wallet | January 05, 2009 at 10:43 PM
I would expect as Jeff Levy surmizes that the blame lies with the Phillies strength and conditioning coach and the PA. If I assume that once the list is updated it is sent directly to the PA they should then be sending it to every single MLB player. I mean it is a billion dollar business. You don't think they can do that for them? That to me is where the disconnect is.
I also don't think we'll hear much from JC in the next day or so (he's on the Phillies WS cruise currently).
Posted by: philsWSchamps | January 05, 2009 at 10:43 PM
Quick question..
how come when Bonds says he didn't know it was a banned substance, nobody believed him but when JC Romero says he doesn't know it was a banned substance, everybody's saying it is unjust?
JC Romero messed up, if he wasn't certain about a product, do some god damn research on the internet and make sure what you're doing won't cost you 1.25MM and won't make you look like a cheater.
Posted by: CGon28 | January 05, 2009 at 10:56 PM
"Are you a just Phillies fan trying to justify a key player's illegal use?"
I am not a Phillies or Romero fan, but this is crap. What he used, and was suspended for was a OTC supliment. If the MLB stated that any OTC supliment bought from a US based store is legal, he should not be suspended. Anyone who cannot see this is ignorant. Romero should sue MLBPA for loss of salary, and eveything else he can milk out of them.
Posted by: SwarzakGuy40 | January 05, 2009 at 11:02 PM
Because Bonds was never told that his product was legal. Romero was told that.
Posted by: bmcane08 | January 05, 2009 at 11:08 PM
And Bonds is lying, Romero isn't.
Posted by: quintjs | January 05, 2009 at 11:11 PM
And when it comes down to it, the product Romero took was legal. The stuff Bonds took wasn't.
Posted by: bmcane08 | January 05, 2009 at 11:12 PM
Well the product Romero was legal but had an illegal substance in it.. that doesn't make any sense.
Look, I have Barry Bonds as much as anybody else, maybe even more, but I really think this is a double-standard right here.
Plus, who says Romero isn't just using this OTC Supplement as a cover for the real illegal supplement he's taking?
Posted by: CGon28 | January 05, 2009 at 11:20 PM
CGon, the project is legal, perfectly legal, but not for baseball players.
Steriods are illegal, by law, what Romero took is illegal by sports.
You can buy it and be perfectly happy.
As i said, half the stuff on the banned list for sports are perfectly legal products like stuff for hair growth, that contain a component that could be performance enhancing. Banned by sports, perfectly legal for the rest of us.
CGon, who said he isn't covering something? well science i guess, he would have to be using something stat of the art, and I hardly think he is the guy.
Posted by: quintjs | January 05, 2009 at 11:30 PM
Okay, I understand that the product is legal.
I guess it would come down to which ingredient in the product triggered the positive test. Cause if it is substance that is commonly found in some sort of steroid, he could be using the OTC supplement as a front of sorts.
I know I'm getting a little crazy here, but when it comes to sports, as sad as it is, I follow the guilty until proven innocent policy because of the terrible history of drug use in the past 10 years or so.
Posted by: CGon28 | January 05, 2009 at 11:40 PM
According to the phil sheridan article here:http://www.philly.com/philly/sports/20090105_Phils_Romero_facing_50-game_ban.html
The timeline was like this.
MLBPA tells all players that OTC supplements are safe.
JC spots a new supplement in Vitimin Shoppe.
JC asks Lien about the supplement, Lien tells him to get a second opinion.
JC asks his trainer, who checked MLB's banned substance list and saw nothing.
Lien sends samples to the MLB.
The lab sends a report to Bud saying it may test positive.
No one tells JC
JC tests positive.
It is clear that, while JC should have gotten the supplement tested first before taking, he isn't the only one at fault in this mess.
Posted by: Apraxhren | January 06, 2009 at 12:33 AM
Quick question..
how come when Bonds says he didn't know it was a banned substance, nobody believed him but when JC Romero says he doesn't know it was a banned substance, everybody's saying it is unjust?
Oh and on top of what everyone else said, Romero's head hasn't grown 3 sizes.
Posted by: philsWSchamps | January 06, 2009 at 06:28 AM
"how come when Bonds says he didn't know it was a banned substance, nobody believed him but when JC Romero says he doesn't know it was a banned substance, everybody's saying it is unjust?"
Because BALCO isn't GNC.
Posted by: A | January 06, 2009 at 07:01 AM
great story on local TV in philly today about this. back in last spring training Romero brought the local media into his home to go over his workout regimen. included in that was the supplements that were all organic. He also consults a chemist whenever he buys a supplement. He only drinks water. He seems to be a health nut that got caught in the system and someone let him down. Its a shame as his arm will be missed. Maybe this leads to Happ being moved to the bullpen (lefty) and then the signing of Derek Lowe.
Anyone that compares him to Bonds, Giambi, McGwire or even Pettitte while trying to be funny is 100% wrong.
Posted by: philsWSchamps | January 06, 2009 at 08:04 AM
This allegation is 110% incorrect. It was said to be legal. This is ridiculous. I don't think Romero can be replaced for 50 games or even close. He brings a special energy and talent to the Phillies. Just ridiculous.
Posted by: Ryan | January 06, 2009 at 08:14 AM
Good Morning Philadelphia had Steve Kelley on location at the GNC he bought it at, this morning. The product is called No2X and the label clearly shown said alternative for anabolic steroid use. He was busted, and then given a choice. One admit he cheated and sit 25 regular season games (including the post season, which were not counted as games in the suspension). Two go to an arbitrator and sit 50.
Posted by: james | January 06, 2009 at 09:41 AM
what is goin on here is that the mlb tells the story in a way that is convenient for them because i'm pretty sure thet if JC tested 100% positive they wouldve just suspended him immediately but why wait till now doesn't every one see they don't want accept the fact that they screw up again why suddenly the product had the warning label and by the way JAMES i think you read the wrong article cuz the name of the product is 6 OXO
Posted by: applegirl | January 08, 2009 at 02:22 PM