![]() |
|
|
| |
« Cardinals Sign Rick Ankiel At Midpoint | Main | Brewers Acquire Nick Green »
1:29pm: David O'Brien of the Atlanta Journal-Constitution offers thoughts on the Glavine situation.
10:42am: Ken Rosenthal of FOX Sports has the latest on the Braves.
Rosenthal believes the Braves have $6-8MM to work with, as they try to re-sign Tom Glavine and add an outfielder. The outfield situation is of greater priority.
The Braves had a positive meeting with Glavine on Wednesday; Rosenthal says their offer gives the lefty "the chance to make $3MM -- a $1MM guarantee, $1MM if he made the Opening Day roster and $1MM if he was on the roster 60 days." Glavine is said to be seeking $3MM guaranteed plus incentives. He wants to retire a Brave, and is intent on pitching in 2009.
As for the outfield, Rosenthal says the Braves are "checking into" free agents such as Garret Anderson, Luis Gonzalez, Jim Edmonds, and Ken Griffey Jr. ESPN's Jerry Crasnick wrote earlier today that the Mariners are making progress with Griffey. Rosenthal says a Nick Swisher trade "also remains possible, but the Braves almost certainly could land one of the free agents for less than the $5.3MM that Swisher will earn in 2009." Swisher is guaranteed an additional $16.75MM for 2010-11, if his 2012 option for $10.25MM is declined.
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
They should have put all the money towards Abreu/Dunn instead of worrying about Glavine.
Posted by: kinsler5 | February 12, 2009 at 10:46 AM
If the "Great" Tom Glavine wanted to retire a Brave, he should take a pay cut for 09, especially because of what he earned and delivered and 08. I hope the Braves turn their back on him.
Sincerely,
A bitter Met fan
Posted by: wright is my boy | February 12, 2009 at 10:51 AM
Get Edmonds, he can still preform! he had 19 homeruns(250 abs)and a .369 obp with the cubbies and can still field
he's way better than those others... stay away from griffey and gonzalez and anderson!!
Posted by: Ben | February 12, 2009 at 10:59 AM
How about Josh Willingham or Austin Kearns for the outfield? Kearns hasn't shown much with the bat the last 2 years, but he's a plus defender.
Willingham has power, but is a defensive liability.
Both could come fairly inexpensively (in prospects) and Washington would likely be willing to eat part of Kearns salary to make room in their outfield for Adam Dunn.
Posted by: estuartj | February 12, 2009 at 11:00 AM
Unbelievable.
So, is McCann hitting cleanup?
Posted by: Smoltz's Beard | February 12, 2009 at 11:00 AM
Go get Garrett Anderson. It would do good to have him back with Casey Kotchman.
Posted by: Stephen Peele | February 12, 2009 at 11:02 AM
Braves and cubs Park Factors are very similar
(8th and 9th in the league)
while the padres, who were 30th
Over the past three years against the braves he has a .971 OPS compared to his total OPS over those three years of .789
Posted by: Ben | February 12, 2009 at 11:03 AM
(I was referring to Edmonds)
Posted by: Ben | February 12, 2009 at 11:04 AM
Why not go get Delmon Young from the Twins? They would give him away for any decent prospect. His defense is also a liability, but he is relatively cheap still.
Posted by: Nick | February 12, 2009 at 11:10 AM
People the writing is on the wall..
The Yank's have the extra fielder and extra bullpen arm perfectly suited for the Braves. This is what they need and want. No? I mean at this point can it be any clearer.
Or I suppose you could sign one of the other players no one else wants and roll the dice...I mean you team is strong enough to be in that position.
I'm kind of getting tired of the lack of production from the Braves rumors on this. Frankly, all I care about is seeing the Yank's improve and it can be done with a named outfield prospect...
Posted by: alittlebitofreason | February 12, 2009 at 11:11 AM
I say Anderson. He doesnt have all the pop as Abreu or Dunn, but he seems better than the rest of those listed in the article. Plus, he hit .293/15/84/66. I never thought at the beginning of the offseason that I would be saying "Anderson sounds okay", WREN!!
Posted by: Tomahawk368 | February 12, 2009 at 11:13 AM
Edmonds looks like a solid option. I'd rather let Morton, Campillo, or Reyes keep the 5th spot warm for Hanson than spend $3 million for another lackluster year of Glavine.
Posted by: Ron Edwards | February 12, 2009 at 11:13 AM
I say we sign Garret Anderson to play everyday in lf and have Shafer start in center everyday no platoons!
Posted by: Justin | February 12, 2009 at 11:14 AM
A G. Anderon/ Diaz platoon in left wouldn't be too bad if it meant keeping all of our specs. Anderson has a horrible walk rate but he makes contact, has moderate power, and for an old guy he plays good defense and is pretty durable.
If you look at Anderson/Diaz 's 3yr L/R splits you could extrapolate a platoon line of .306/.342/.480/.822 and ~17HR. Those are not cleanup numbers but its a solid contact hitter line that you want in the 5-6 spot to drive in 80-90RBIs a year. At this point, how bad could that be?
Posted by: bbxxj | February 12, 2009 at 11:15 AM
and the Braves should pass on Glavine. I believe it is more a PR stunt on this one. That money could be better spent since they are nickel and diming..
Posted by: alittlebitofreason | February 12, 2009 at 11:16 AM
can Tom Glavine play RF too, maybe a little first as a back up? He could be your PH in the bottom of the 9th, down 2 runs with men on 2nd and 3rd.
Just a thought...
Posted by: alittlebitofreason | February 12, 2009 at 11:18 AM
If you want to retire a Brave, then take the Braves offer!
Posted by: Tomahawk368 | February 12, 2009 at 11:20 AM
People the writing is on the wall..
The Yank's have the extra fielder and extra bullpen arm perfectly suited for the Braves. This is what they need and want. No? I mean at this point can it be any clearer.
Or I suppose you could sign one of the other players no one else wants and roll the dice...I mean you team is strong enough to be in that position.
I'm kind of getting tired of the lack of production from the Braves rumors on this. Frankly, all I care about is seeing the Yank's improve and it can be done with a named outfield prospect...
-----------------
and what would that named prospect be..... I really hope you are not thinking it will be the #3 prospect in baseball
Posted by: Crown_royal_34 | February 12, 2009 at 11:23 AM
Dont bitch about all this pride B.S. Have you not looked around lately? The Braves havent had the best offseason, and you are whining about your salary, and you arent going to play a big role anyway!
Posted by: Tomahawk368 | February 12, 2009 at 11:24 AM
alittlebitofreason: "I'm kind of getting tired of the lack of production from the Braves rumors on this. Frankly, all I care about is seeing the Yank's improve and it can be done with a named outfield prospect..."
are you the same person who was arguing that the braves should trade heyward for swisher?? a named outfield prospect, sure. just not schafer,heyward or gorky. no hansen or freeman either. julio teheran is off limits. cole rohrbough, nope sorry. there are not a whole lot of prospects we have that i would be willing to trade to get a .219 hitter, sorry
Posted by: atlbraves08 | February 12, 2009 at 11:24 AM
I really think Glavine in the 5 spot could be a very good rotation. I just do NOT want Swisher. To expensive, and he wont give you anymore than Edmonds or Anderson would. I would be OK with Anderson, and Edmonds would be nice too. He could play left and play center on days Josh Anderson needs a break. Edmonds could hit 5th and get 20 HR's and hit .270 or so. He probably would be cheap, Heck they would both be cheap!
Posted by: ScottBravesfan19 | February 12, 2009 at 11:25 AM
Griffey is about to sign with the M's, Anderson is a productive hitter but frankly should be a DH/PH for an AL team, and Edmonds and Luis Gonzalez would be good as a 4th OF's. The Braves seriously should consider trading for Nady or Swisher both have are young, have pop, and versatile defensively, while being moderately priced. Plus I have a feeling the Yanks are trying to clear a spot for Manny so this might all happen relatively soon.
Posted by: JRodNY | February 12, 2009 at 11:25 AM
Crown apparently there are not many other ideas...
As another braves fan said last night. The future braves outfield btw 2011-2015 could be the best in the league. Ok. How about the next 2 or 3 seasons until then...
You can't mean to tell me that with the current roster you have. An Anderson and Glavine signing will prop up the team until then with questionable bullpen arms.
Marte and Swisher will be like oxygen for a fire going out right now..
Posted by: alittlebitofreason | February 12, 2009 at 11:27 AM
Anderson is the best of these castoffs. Don't the Yankees have a surplus of OF's who they want to get rid of? Trouble is they have no value, but the Yankees will want something for them. Braves made the mistake was getting 3 pitchers thus eliminating the cash for a premium bat.
Posted by: optionn | February 12, 2009 at 11:27 AM
good luck in 09 and 2010 then atlbrave08
we're in a good position with or without these players I mentioned.
Posted by: alittlebitofreason | February 12, 2009 at 11:29 AM
I dont see where we need another bullpen arm!
Carlyle, Bennett, Acosta, Boyer, Moylan, Soriano, Gonzalez, Vlad Richard was decent, and we have Ridgway Logan and O'flaherty. And lets be honest people LOOGY relievers get one batter out. Its not like if you dont have a Will Ohman Demarse Marte dominant guy. Just a guy who can get one batter out.
Posted by: ScottBravesfan19 | February 12, 2009 at 11:29 AM
^ Forgot Campillo also if we get Glavine.
I
I
Posted by: ScottBravesfan19 | February 12, 2009 at 11:30 AM
We should have stuck with Vazquez and Lowe and skipped on Kawakami. Then, we could have signed Dunn or Abreu followed by Glavine to fill out the rotation.
Posted by: Tomahawk368 | February 12, 2009 at 11:33 AM
Take it easy on Glavine, he's doing whats neccessary to stay a Brave. He wasn't the one who turned his back on Atlanta to begin with. The Braves thought they had upgraded with Hampton and kicked Glavine out the door.
As far as the outfield situation is concerned. I hope on all things holy the braves don't trade for Swisher. That contract is too expensive for a mediocre bat. Next years 5.3M is reasonable, but after that it get expensive real quick. I like the fact that he can cover center in a pinch, but not enough to overpay for him. Griffey, Anderson, Edmonds all make sense and in that order. Diaz will get time versus the good lefties (Hamels, Santana, Perez, Olson, Lannon), and short of facing those guys any of them seems to be a positive presence. Griffey and Edmonds get bonus points because they can play center if needed.
I think we'll end up with Francouer hitting cleanup. So a platoon in the 6 spot seems exceptable. Leaves alot riding on a Frenchy rebound though.
Posted by: bravo84 | February 12, 2009 at 11:33 AM
Any chance the Braves would be interested in Luke Scott? He's cheap, productive and under contract for a couple more seasons. Also, the crowd at Camden Yards (what's left of us anyway), rather enjoyed chanting "Luuuuuuuuke!" whenever he came to bat or made a play in the field. ;)
Posted by: ChaosLex | February 12, 2009 at 11:36 AM
fair enough bravo84
But Griffey, Anderson, Edmonds in that order will be signed today/tomorrow before Wren even picks up the phone. I think you know this already.
Then what? You know I am joking aorund with everyone here, but I am somewhat enjoying the leverage other teams are gaining from this. Just a business thing...
Posted by: alittlebitofreason | February 12, 2009 at 11:36 AM
Couldn't agree more on Kawakami tomohawk. His best case scenario is an ERA of around 4 innings eater. We could have got that with Garland or Looper for only one guaranteed year, less dollar value for that year, and known what to expect from that spot in the rotation.
If they hadn't signed him they could have got Abreu/Dunn plus Glavine and still had money left for Ohman.
Posted by: bravo84 | February 12, 2009 at 11:36 AM
Bravo84,
I think a lot of this year is really reliant on Francoeur. He has to be the power hitting outfielder now since we couldnt get anyone else. So I think Francoeur's season could ultimately tell the Braves season..... Also Kotchman and Kelly should be reaady for a break out year.
Posted by: ScottBravesfan19 | February 12, 2009 at 11:37 AM
Luke Scott wouldnt be bad I just saw that post. He hit 23 HR's last year. What would we have to give up and how much does he make is the question?
Posted by: ScottBravesfan19 | February 12, 2009 at 11:40 AM
Well, the O's are pretty deep in the outfield (Markakis, Jones, Pie and Reimold) and they're fine pitching wise; however, they desperately need infield prospects. Maybe a corner infield prospect (obviously no one top tier) and a lesser pitching prospect (or two)?
Posted by: ChaosLex | February 12, 2009 at 11:45 AM
LUKE SCOTT- .257823/65/.336/.472 makes 430K!!! I'd jump on a deal for him easy.
Posted by: Gamecockbrave04 | February 12, 2009 at 11:45 AM
^^^ That should have been .257/65/.336/.472
Posted by: Gamecockbrave04 | February 12, 2009 at 11:46 AM
With Abreu and Dunn off the market I say save the money for a mid season trade. Lets just roll with a Diaz/Brandon Jones platoon. Platoons are not a bad thing if the guys produce. Diaz needs to get back to what he was in 2006-2007 and Brandon jones needs to prove he can be productive in the bigs, but Id take those two over spending money on Edmonds, Anderson, Griffey or Gonzalez...all day!! Then when teams start to fall out of the race we can jump in and trade for a power hitting OF this summer if we need one.
Posted by: bennie2323 | February 12, 2009 at 11:48 AM
I can see the Braves being in on one of the National's available outfielders.
I'm sure all it would take is a low level pitching prospect to nab Kearns/Pena... Maybe more for Willingham.
Posted by: Ink&Paper | February 12, 2009 at 11:49 AM
Matt Diaz hit .319 against lefties (.159 vs righties) and Scott hit .269 vs righties (.215 vs lefties). That would be a nice platoon. Switch 'em off for lefties vs righties.
Posted by: Gamecockbrave04 | February 12, 2009 at 11:50 AM
Scott is an interesting idea for a platoon in left, but he would have to come really cheap prospect wise.
To the commenter that mentioned Marte as part of a trade with Swisher or Nady, Marte is set to make $4M a year, we can barely pay that for our OF need, definitely not paying that when we could get Ohman, Reyes, or Biemel cheaper, but I applaud your effort to dump your crap contract.
Willingham seems to be a reasonable idea. He's a risk but if he's healthy he's great. Mix that with Francouer and I'd put it at 75% chance that one would become a solid cleanup hitter for us. Would make sense to wait and see if Nick Johnson is going to be healthy. If the A's sign Cabrera, the Nats will have nowhere to go with Johnson and might unload Willingham cheap.
Posted by: bravo84 | February 12, 2009 at 11:56 AM
I dont see what the Braves would accomplish getting Kearns or Pena other than a cheaper less effective version of Swisher. I am starting to fall into the category of a Diaz/Jones or Blanco platoon. If Blanco proves he can hit .280 and steal 20 bases and have the on base he had last year he is fine with me, plus B.Jones cant play center and Blanco can.
Posted by: ScottBravesfan19 | February 12, 2009 at 11:57 AM
Speaking of Nick Johnson wonder if Kotchman can play LF? Maybe trade for Johnson (since Washington is the only team to ever trade in-division (Milidge, Olsen, Willingham)) and move Kotchman to left? He is good defensively but its just a thought and maybe you can platoon him and put him at first against lefties and Diaz start in LF.
Posted by: ScottBravesfan19 | February 12, 2009 at 11:59 AM
Kotchman is Gold glove caliber at first, and his bat is mediocre, so in my opinion if he is gonna be on the field I want to get the most I can out of his glove.
Kearns makes no sense, Diaz hits as well as he does and Kearns costs a ton more. Pena has incredible upside he just never seems to perform up to it. I feel if the braves are going to get a RH bat, that bat has to be good enough to plant Diaz firmly on the bench, or has to be able to play some centerfield. Willingham is the only bat we've talked about that is close to that.
Posted by: bravo84 | February 12, 2009 at 12:07 PM
That's a pretty funny one.
"but I applaud your effort to dump your crap contract"
You can't mean to tell me you just suggested Marte and his contract are crap.
Alright I'm done here. Can someone pass the Braves fans and the organization a broom to sweep the dirt over the hole they have dug.
I'm just amazed, more so from pure entertainment, how un-workable, un motivated and illogical this has become for you guys.
Good luck. Going to post of some other articles where the conversation may have potential.
Posted by: alittlebitofreason | February 12, 2009 at 12:09 PM
N. Johnson is a player you can't count on. The guy always get injure, he is too fragile.
Posted by: DominicanYanks | February 12, 2009 at 12:21 PM
It would behoove the Braves to re-engage the Cardinals for Ankiel's services.
He is a much better option, all things considered, than Nady or Swisher.
Posted by: easton714 | February 12, 2009 at 12:23 PM
Marte's contract is bad. 3/12 when guys like Beimel, Ohman, Reyes, Cruz, etc. are all going to sign 1 year deals for much less than 4 million per. To the Yankees it may not matter but to the all other teams it does.
I hope you quit posting on Braves threads alittlebitofreason. All you talk about is Schafer and "Heywood". Also you didn't know who Matt Weiters was in a previous thread. Instead of posting on here, you should go learn something about baseballs best prospects so you don't sound stupid. You seem to have some strange obsession with the Braves and how you think the Yankees have them in a corner. Yes we are interested in Swisher but we aren't going to trade our top prospects for him. There are other options available, and there's no reason to give up good talent for a contract that is borderline bad. I mean maybe we could give up Gorkys, but that seems like a lot. Not that I would expect you to know who that is.
Posted by: garriscp | February 12, 2009 at 12:24 PM
For whoever said that the Cubs park factor is similar to the Braves', yes. However, their park factors for home-runs are fairly different. Wrigley is 7th with 1.163 and Turner is 12th with 1.014.
Posted by: AtlantaBred | February 12, 2009 at 12:26 PM
garriscp, why are you talking about Mart's contract when it has nothing to do with this topic.
Posted by: DominicanYanks | February 12, 2009 at 12:28 PM
That being said, I think an Edmonds/Diaz platoon makes a heck of a lot of sense.
Posted by: AtlantaBred | February 12, 2009 at 12:29 PM
DominicanYanks, you missed our wonderful conversation with alittlebitofreason, whose name now that I think of it is kinda funny.
Posted by: bravo84 | February 12, 2009 at 12:36 PM
Sounds good to me AtlantaBred, plus we could get a little extra pop in the lineup by playing Edmonds in center every so often.
Posted by: bravo84 | February 12, 2009 at 12:38 PM
That's a pretty funny one.
"but I applaud your effort to dump your crap contract"
You can't mean to tell me you just suggested Marte and his contract are crap.
Alright I'm done here. Can someone pass the Braves fans and the organization a broom to sweep the dirt over the hole they have dug.
I'm just amazed, more so from pure entertainment, how un-workable, un motivated and illogical this has become for you guys.
Good luck. Going to post of some other articles where the conversation may have potential.
----------------------------
We are not being the ones that are being illogical. Maybe you should get an idea of what you are talking about. Not even in the Peavy trade did they try to say we should trade Heyward and now you think it would be reasonable to trade him for a guy coming off a .219 season and one of the worst contracts given out this offseason. I would at least give you some consideration if you said Gorky or maybe Schafer but to shoot for possibly the best hitting prospect in the minors is nuts and i will bet you my next paycheck the Yankees GM didn't even think to ask about him when they talked
Posted by: Crown_royal_34 | February 12, 2009 at 12:45 PM
Good luck. Going to post of some other articles where the conversation may have potential.
Posted by: alittlebitofreason | February 12, 2009 at 12:09 PM
Well, I hope you make more sensable comments when you leave for other "conversations". Yesterday, you said that it would be a fair trade for the Braves to give up Gorkys Hernandez and/or Jason Heyward for Nick Swisher. Heyward is one of the top five prospects in all of minor league baseball and Swisher hit .219 last year. Even Gorkys Hernandez alone is too much to give up.
Your problem is that you want to give up an overpaid, underproductive Swisher and get multiple quality minor leaguers in return. That isn't happening.
The most the Braves should give up for Swisher is a couple of low level minor league prospects.
Posted by: BravesAllTheWay | February 12, 2009 at 12:50 PM
I am also leaning towards just using a Brandon Jones/Diaz platoon in LF for next season. It's also possible that Jordan Schafer gets hot in Spring Training and wins one of the outfield spots. None of those free agents sound too appealing and there is no sense in overpaying for some other team's castoffs.
Posted by: BravesAllTheWay | February 12, 2009 at 12:54 PM
Garret Anderson in left Schaffer in center and be done with it no platoons!
Posted by: Justin | February 12, 2009 at 01:17 PM
"I am also leaning towards just using a Brandon Jones/Diaz platoon in LF for next season. It's also possible that Jordan Schafer gets hot in Spring Training and wins one of the outfield spots. None of those free agents sound too appealing and there is no sense in overpaying for some other team's castoffs."
I've got Jordan Schafer penciled in for the Center Field spot. I think Josh Anderson plays the first month in center then the Braves bring up Schafer (delays his free agency 1 year even if he gets 4 arbitration years) for Center Field/leadoff. His defense would be wasted at Left. I think the lineup probably looks like this on June 15th (if we get Edmonds, which seems to be the most reasonable option at this point even though Ryan Ludwick is, and has always been, the best option):
vs. RHP
1. Schafer
2. Escobar
3. Chipper
4. McCann
5. Edmonds
6. Francoeur
7. KJ
8. Kotchman
vs. LHP
1. Escobar
2. Schafer
3. Chipper
4. Francoeur
5. McCann
6. Diaz
7. KJ
8. Kotchman
One of Prado/Infante probably needs to get moved because we'll need a defensive-minded 4th outfielder on the bench i.e. Josh Anderson. The one that doesn't get moved will fill in vs. LHP to give infielders regular rest. Ross also will play a good amount vs. LHP. Norton stays on the bench for that big-time pinch-hitting situation.
Posted by: AtlantaBred | February 12, 2009 at 01:18 PM
I'll have to agree with AtlantaBred that Edmonds makes a logical choice. He is too old to be an everyday player but can take over at LF and C to platoon with Diaz and give Schafer a day off from time to time. He couldn't cost much at all, it avoids the costly Swisher contract, and gives veteran experience to the outfield to help in the progression of Schafer, Gorkys, and Anderson who will all be up on the team at one point or another this year.
Posted by: ATLmcgriff | February 12, 2009 at 01:43 PM
DominicanYanks,
alittlebitofreason seems to think the Braves should take Marte off your hands.
That's not employing even a little bit of reason, since by all reports Ohman was looking for 2/$8 million (and the Braves wouldn't go that high). Why would they pick up Marte's contract, which is one year longer, AND give up talent to the Yanks in return?
Makes no sense at all.
Posted by: ink-stained scribe | February 12, 2009 at 01:51 PM
Wren should re-negotiate the deal with Ohman, offering 3 million, one year, then finish the Glavine signing (its going to get done whether we like it or not) and do that for $1 million guaranteed plus up to $4 more in deferred incentives, and get Edmonds on a 1-year $2 million deal. There are your $6 million left and dealt out for a solid season, top to bottom.
Posted by: ATLmcgriff | February 12, 2009 at 01:58 PM
OK. I'm going to give my thoughts on alittlebitofreason's war with everyone else. I remember yesterday when we were discussing a Rafael Soriano (bad contract and 1 year), Gorkys Hernandez, Charlie Morton, and Jo Jo Reyes for Marte and Swisher. I think this trade makes sense. The Braves move 6.1 million in Soriano's contract and get back a much more reasonably priced contract in Marte at 3.75 million, plus he's under team control for 3 years plus a club option for a 4th. Then Gorkys, Reyes, and Morton for Swisher. The 3.35 we save in the move covers all but 2 million of Swisher's contract then we have enough to give Glavine the contract he wants.
It wouldn't make sense to acquire Marte, but moving Soriano in favor of Marte does make sense because you get a more reliable set-up man for a cheaper price and under team control for longer.
Posted by: AtlantaBred | February 12, 2009 at 02:01 PM
No worries. The Sox will gladly trade you Jason Bay, Josh Bard, and Charlie Zink for Brian McCann. Give Theo a call, and tell 'em I sent you.
Posted by: Little Bear | February 12, 2009 at 02:09 PM
AtlantaBred,
Thats just about the first thing I've disagreed with you about. Yes dumping Soriano's salary for this year is an interesting idea, but dropping 6.1M this year to take on 12M for the next 3 isn't a huge help. Plus it would bring in Swisher which would further hamper us for the 2010 and 2011 seasons payroll. And the biggest objection I have is that you want to give up Morton, Reyes, and Gorkys to go along with Soriano for Marte and Swisher. Gorkys alone is plenty for this. I think Morton plus 1 would be enough for Swisher.
Posted by: bravo84 | February 12, 2009 at 02:25 PM
How do Braves' fans feel about Brandon Hicks?
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | February 12, 2009 at 02:30 PM
I'd trade him for Swisher if thats what your asking.
He has talent, but is probably in a make or break year for him. He's on the brink between being an everyday player or a utility guy. Either way he has positive value at the major league level. If he doesn't perform this year he could be a utility guy next year, but would probably require 2 years to be serviceable as a starting shortstop. If I'm correct I think its more of a glove problem.(Although he does strikeout way too much)His glove right now just won't play everyday at shortstop.
Posted by: bravo84 | February 12, 2009 at 02:42 PM
To the person who said Scott was making 430k, recheck your numbers:
Luke Scott of
1 year/$2.4M (2009)
* 1 year/$2.4M (2009)
o re-signed by Baltimore 1/20/09 (avoided arbitration)
Posted by: unbiasedhomer | February 12, 2009 at 02:44 PM
Also has trouble making contact. But huge power upside at his position.
Posted by: bravo84 | February 12, 2009 at 02:46 PM
If Scott's making 2.4M I wouldn't give a box of balls and batting helmet for him. Edmonds could be had for that and would provide leadership and the ability to play center. Plus Scott's power numbers are inflated by playing with a short porch in right.
Posted by: bravo84 | February 12, 2009 at 02:50 PM
Ankiel for Prado, Reyes/Morton, and 2 low level prospects.
Posted by: OklahomaBrave | February 12, 2009 at 02:53 PM
little bear... so u wanna talk brian mccann lol... hmm, how does ellsbury,lester, bard and anderson sound?? lol and i still dont know if id pull the trigger
Posted by: atlbraves08 | February 12, 2009 at 02:56 PM
I'm not sure I like that from the braves side, and I can already tell you Cards fans are gonna hate it. Boyer might be interesting, he has the stuff to close until Perez is ready.
I'd definately give Soriano and Prado with a low level prospect. Don't know if the Cards could take on the extra 3mil though.
Posted by: bravo84 | February 12, 2009 at 03:00 PM
It's all moot anyway, because Braves aren't getting Swisher or Nady unless they give up some CF prospects. and as y'all say los bravos would be "unwise" to do so, although if Shafer or Hernandez develop into Nady's offensive skillsets, you'd be psyched.
Posted by: ArodMVP217 | February 12, 2009 at 03:15 PM
SIGN EDMONDS AND GLAVINE! we could use em both.
Posted by: Niekroisgod | February 12, 2009 at 03:19 PM
Would Nady and Shelly Duncan for Brandon Hicks, Blanco and Prado.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | February 12, 2009 at 03:26 PM
Ankiel for Prado, Reyes/Morton, and 2 low level prospects.
Posted by: OklahomaBrave | February 12, 2009 at 02:53 PM
That is WAY too much to give up for a one year rental player.
Posted by: BravesAllTheWay | February 12, 2009 at 03:29 PM
After the Tex fiasco the Braves are NOT in the market for rental players. This includes Nady, Ankiel, etc.
Posted by: BravesAllTheWay | February 12, 2009 at 03:34 PM
YanksFanSince78 it sounds like Nady for Hicks, Blanco, and Prado. As Duncan is nothing but a non-roster invite who will be playing in AAA in a couple months. Nady is a one year rental so Hicks and Blanco is all I'd be willing to move. Might get somewhere if you took Infante instead of Prado, he would provide enough relief for us to still sign Glavine and maybe Edmonds, and would make up for Betemit who you traded for Swisher. Actually Infante and Morton/Reyes sounds promising for Nady.
Posted by: bravo84 | February 12, 2009 at 03:44 PM
I think unless we sign a low one year contract to a guy like Edmonds or Anderson, we will most likely see the platoon of Diaz/Jones in LF and either Schafer or Anderson in CF. A trade now for someone that would eat up the rest of our money isn't exactly wise. We can go back and offer Ohman another deal and sign Glavine and see how it goes in the outfield. I would love for Edmonds, Anderson, or Gonzalez (to a lesser extent) to help split time in LF just for their leadership and give the new guys some rest. But spending 5.3 mil on Swisher with an extreme raise next year would make the Hudson option unviable.
Posted by: ATLmcgriff | February 12, 2009 at 03:50 PM
1 prospect in Single-A is not enough for 3 years of an outfielder. Braves fans in general over-value prospects. Proven players are always worth more than prospects.
Posted by: AtlantaBred | February 12, 2009 at 03:51 PM
Also 2 draft picks for Nady.
Posted by: AtlantaBred | February 12, 2009 at 03:52 PM
Jr looks headed to Seattle, so how about 1/3 for Anderson and Glavine then send Infante/Prado,Redmond/Acosta, and Reyes for Swisher
Posted by: Braves for NL East!! | February 12, 2009 at 04:01 PM
What about Nick Swisher for Rafael Soriano and either Cole Rohrbough or Craig Kimbrell
Posted by: Baseball33 | February 12, 2009 at 04:05 PM
AtlantaBred,
3 years of an overpaid OFer isn't worth that much, but I still suggested Blanco to go with Hicks.
The Swisher for Soriano has legit promise, if we don't get Marte back and can then go sign Ohman as a solid set up man. Ohman could probably be had at 2yr 6M at this point. So the trade would only cost 2.2 Million next year. So we'd still have roughly 3-4M available for Glavine and maybe another cheap reliever.
Posted by: bravo84 | February 12, 2009 at 04:17 PM
Look let's go get Swisher and call it a day... and quit bagging on Glavine looks like the hold up on the contract is the fact that he is going to defer money so he can play with Atlanta this year and let them spend money on the outfield..
We need to win and get back in the playoffs again and we are not going to get there if we don't pull the trigger on a good PROVEN bat not a prospect..
Posted by: Murphy belongs in the Hall | February 12, 2009 at 04:23 PM
What do Yanks fans think of Soriano and Marek for Swisher. Costs you another 800K this year but saves the remaining 16.75M on his contract. Gives you a good setup man for this year, and a solid bullpen prospect.
Posted by: bravo84 | February 12, 2009 at 04:26 PM
First of all, Nick Swisher isn't overpaid. 7-8 million a season is significantly UNDER market value for a switch-hitter with a .354 OBP and about average defense. Secondly, 3 years of Nick Swisher is worth more than Gorkys Hernandez. If Hernandez and Jurrjens, both prospects, are worth 1 year of Edgar Renteria then Hernandez isn't worth 3 years of Swisher. You're delusional if you think Hicks and Blanco is worth 3 years of Swisher. Hicks isn't worth much alone and Blanco isn't worth ANYTHING other than a throw-in.
Posted by: AtlantaBred | February 12, 2009 at 04:29 PM
So we'd still have roughly 3-4M available for Glavine and maybe another cheap reliever.
Or Chipper's extension
Posted by: Braves for NL East!! | February 12, 2009 at 04:32 PM
How much should we pay Chipper? I'd put it at 3/30 or 2/30
Posted by: Braves for NL East!! | February 12, 2009 at 04:34 PM
3/30.
Posted by: AtlantaBred | February 12, 2009 at 04:38 PM
The trade i came up with last nite(Soriano,Morton,Reyes, and Hernandez for Marte and Swisher) would be awesome, hopefully we cluld then get some money to eat MARTE''s Salary
Posted by: Braves for NL East!! | February 12, 2009 at 04:39 PM
cluld= could
Posted by: Braves for NL East!! | February 12, 2009 at 04:46 PM
AtlantaBred, I think you might want to look back at what Swisher is actually worth, because in this extreme situation we actually no what he is worth. (Wilson Betemit and Jeff Marquez, plus Jhonny Nunez as a throw in to match Kanekoa Texeira that the yanks got back) I don't know what make you think he's worth more than a solid utility guy and an above average pitcher. Basically the equivalent of Infante and Morton/Reyes. Thats the facts, he hasn't played a game since his last trade so I don't know why he's suddenly worth so much more. The Yanks have young pitching and want a young OFer so Gorkys makes the most sense. And if Bobby Abreu is only worth 6M including incentive, then Swisher is worth only about 4-4.5, as he has lower Avg,OBP,RBI,R, and similar HR production.
Posted by: bravo84 | February 12, 2009 at 04:48 PM
you can keep Marek i should have asked for Soriano, Rohrbough, and Kimbrell but i wanted to see if people would go for it. You guys should be old sports and throw in Andy Shibilo the home town kid. As for yankee fans out there i would not want gorky hernandez - we don't need him. Where is he going to play and when.
Posted by: Baseball33 | February 12, 2009 at 04:50 PM
What about Jermaine Dye? The Reds weren't gonna give up much so why should we? He'd be a hell of alot better than Swisher
Posted by: Braves for NL East!! | February 12, 2009 at 04:53 PM
Seriously Baseball33 I figured you'd rather have Marek than Kimbrell. Marek could help next year and has drawn comparisons to Joey Devine. Kimbrell has great stuff, but is a long way from being able to help a big league team. And while there is a lot of talent in the yanks pen there isn't a lot of guys that have proven their durability. Next to Rivera the most appearances was Veras who through 57 innings. Just thought it might make sense for the Yanks to get someone who could help now out there.
Soriano and Rohrbough makes sense, but only because Soriano has negative value right now. You won't get both though.
Posted by: bravo84 | February 12, 2009 at 05:01 PM
Dye is out of our price range and the Sox won't eat salary.
Posted by: bravo84 | February 12, 2009 at 05:03 PM
And as for the people that think swisher is over paid, have fun winning the national league east with francoeur, anderson, blanco, and diaz in your outfield.
Posted by: Baseball33 | February 12, 2009 at 05:05 PM
What if we offer Soriano and Morton for Damaso Marte and Infante and Reyes for Delmon Young?
Posted by: Braves for NL East!! | February 12, 2009 at 05:06 PM
To be honest, I don't know much about Marek but his numbers don't look bad. Personally I think the Yankee pen is going to surprise allot of people this year. I also think that the yankee farm system has better arms in it to help throughout the season than people give them credit for.
Posted by: Baseball33 | February 12, 2009 at 05:13 PM