![]() |
|
|
| |
« Brewers Clinging To Top Prospects | Main | Twins DFA Luis Ayala »
The Cincinnati Enquirer's John Fay spoke payroll and trade possibilities with Reds general manager Walt Jocketty this afternoon. Here's a quick rundown...
Jocketty first addressed a small rumor that ran in the Boston Globe this week concerning right-hander Bronson Arroyo, who is 8-5 with a 5.16 ERA and 1.39 WHIP over 14 starts this season. The Globe's Nick Carfado implied Sunday that Arroyo might be available because the Reds are making "an effort to get younger and reduce payroll." Jocketty refuted both claims.
"I haven't talked to anyone about Bronson," the GM said plainly. And as for the issue of payroll:
"I'd say right now we're buyers. We're looking for a hitter. If we did something," he continued, "it would probably be to bring in a hitter. Getting Joey [Votto] back is going to help.
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
It's time for this team to become buyers. They have a good shot to make the playoffs playing in a division that none of the typical contenders seem to want to win. If they can add another bat there lookin pretty good and they get one of horses on the mound back soon.
Posted by: bravoboy10 | June 23, 2009 at 08:07 PM
I'm glad to hear this, i still think Reds have a really good chance at least a wild card playoff berth. Hopefully we can find that right handed power bat soon, but i think Gomes should play everyday and he could be that power bat.
Posted by: whodey1010 | June 23, 2009 at 08:08 PM
I'm not familiar with the Reds farm system. Do they have any good corner infield prospects they'd be willing to give up for Huff? I'm sure Yonder Alonso is out of the equation.
Posted by: THEBIGFISH99 | June 23, 2009 at 08:42 PM
I think the Tribe and the Reds match up pretty well here. De Rosa to the Reds. He'd look good at 3B and could fill in elsewhere. Good right handed bat for the Reds. Would the Indians be willing to take a chance on Homer Bailey (the shine is definitely off that nickel). Or Todd Frazier or Drew Stubbles or Juan Francisco or Josh Roenicke. Lot's of possibilities.
Posted by: MickS | June 23, 2009 at 09:40 PM
Yonder Alonso will not be traded so easily. Dont count on Jocketty giving up Alonso in a package unless its for Jones. O's wont trade him and thats my point haha.
Huff is decent, a guy to take reps at third, but another lefty? High Ks, low avg..not what the Reds need.
Reds have a decent number of prospects to trade for the right price. Bailey, Stubbs, Alonso, Fraizer, Soto are the better prospects. Thompson, Fransisco, Sutten, Dorn, Lokzar (although i like him a lot) we could trade one or a few of the guys for a bat.
We need a right handed outfielder/shortstop/third basemen. Young, or controllable for a few years. Renting isnt a very good option unless its at a discount.
Posted by: GmblngPtchr20 | June 23, 2009 at 09:47 PM
I wouldnt give up Frazier, OR Stubbs for De Rosa
Posted by: GmblngPtchr20 | June 23, 2009 at 09:48 PM
I said that I didn't think Alonso would be part of discussions. I wasn't saying that it should be Huff for Alonso.
Posted by: THEBIGFISH99 | June 23, 2009 at 09:59 PM
The shine is off bailey? the guy has pitched the best he ever has in the last month and half.
the indians would jump at him for derosa
Posted by: redsincebirth | June 23, 2009 at 10:18 PM
If I'm the Reds I'm keeping the higher end prospects (Stubbs, Bailey, Alonso, and Fraizer) and dealing some of the lesser talent along with Encarcion.
They need a long term answer at SS and a LF wouldn't be bad either. Though some combination of Dickerson/Nix/Gomes will work just as well.
I would like to see the Reds make a play for Stephen Drew or JJ Hardy.
Huff I don't think provides the Reds with anything that they need being that he's more a 1B/DH at this point then he is a 3B and the Reds already have a superior player at 1B.
DeRosa I think will be highly sought after and the cost won't match what his value will be to the team that acquires him.
I think I would release Taveras and call up Stubbs, he would take over CF and leadoff duties.
I would send EE to the Giants for Sanchez to give the Reds a lefty with some stuff, though I think Sanchez has taken a major step backwards this year. Had very high hopes for him.
Fraizer would become my 3B.
That leaves SS as the position that I try to fill.
If Drew were really available I would be open to dealing Alonso in a package to get him.
Posted by: schellis | June 23, 2009 at 10:23 PM
bailey 14 GS 89.2 IP 1.27 whip 82k/27bb 2.71 era
Posted by: redsincebirth | June 23, 2009 at 10:26 PM
absolutely would go after drew
if we got him then i would think about moving EE not sure about sanchez though GABP might not be good for him frazier and stubbs do deserve a shot
Posted by: redsincebirth | June 23, 2009 at 10:29 PM
I still think the Reds should target the Dodgers with Arroyo and or Harang. Target Hudson (and move Phillips to SS, which is where he should be anyway)for Arroyo, or Kemp and a bad expiring pitching contract (Dodgers have plenty) for Harang, and solve the Reds CF/RH bat problem at once.
If those options aren't pursued, I'd love to see an Arroyo + Masset/Victorino + prospect trade, or an Arroyo + Owings/Granderson trade to spark the top of the order. With as much depth as the Reds bullpen has, and for as young and cheap as it is, leverage the heck out of it.
Posted by: Kevin Mitchell is Batman | June 23, 2009 at 10:51 PM
"I still think the Reds should target the Dodgers with Arroyo and or Harang. Target Hudson (and move Phillips to SS, which is where he should be anyway)for Arroyo, or Kemp and a bad expiring pitching contract (Dodgers have plenty) for Harang, and solve the Reds CF/RH bat problem at once.
If those options aren't pursued, I'd love to see an Arroyo + Masset/Victorino + prospect trade, or an Arroyo + Owings/Granderson trade to spark the top of the order. With as much depth as the Reds bullpen has, and for as young and cheap as it is, leverage the heck out of it.
Posted by: Kevin Mitchell is Batman | June 23, 2009 at 10:51 PM"
Umm...I don't know what to say. I'm almost 100% sure that the Dodgers wouldn't trade Kemp for Harang or Hudson for Arroyo.
Also, Granderson isn't going anywhere. I'm not sure how you value players, but you might want to look it over again.
Posted by: THEBIGFISH99 | June 23, 2009 at 10:58 PM
EE has been horrible and pretty much the entire league knows it so you aren't going to get much for him. He's pretty much at the end of the line in Cincinnati and I think it would be best for him and the team if they parted ways. Because of that the Reds need to target similar players in other organizations. Those that have talent but haven't capitalized on said talent yet. Which is why I like Sanchez.
I wouldn't trade for a OF because Stubbs is all but ready and the Reds have a far larger hole that needs filled at SS.
However a Kemp/Stubbs/Bruce OF would be outstanding defensively. I don't like the idea of dealing Harang. He's the glue that holds the rotation together. Need one vet to help the kids along, and considering they are paid similarly I keep Harang over Arroyo.
I also don't like the idea of moving Phillips to SS. Why turn a plus defender into potentially a ordinary one. Generally players don't go up the defensive chart (something like this C,SS,2B,CF,3B,RF,1B,LF)
There is also the problem that the Dodgers are in the thick of the race and aren't going to give away key parts to their team. I can't recall the last time any team that was making a playoff push trade gave up very good starters to accomplish it.
Posted by: schellis | June 23, 2009 at 11:06 PM
As for Bailey, he's finally owning AAA hitters, not just pitching well but looking like he's a ML pitcher there with his A game. If the split finger is a real out pitch for him then he can still make good.
Give him three starts at the ML level to show what he can do.
If he's a headcase with one pitch then you move him, but if he's the guy that is dominating AAA now the Reds have three young ace caliber arms.
Oakland and Atlanta made World Series runs with similar.
Which is why Arroyo is the guy to trade and the prospects that project to be 3s and 4s are what needs to be moved.
Posted by: schellis | June 23, 2009 at 11:11 PM
I would absolutely love to see Delmond Young as a Red beause i think his full potential could be reached at Great American Small Park.
Also with the twins needing a third baseman I say you give up EE and a prospect to do so.
Both of these players need a change of scenery and both would get it in this trade.
Posted by: Vottomatic | June 24, 2009 at 12:23 AM
"If we did something," he continued, "it would probably be to bring in a hitter."
As Reds fans, WHERE have we heard THIS before?
Oh yeah, last Fall, two weeks BEFORE Ca$htellini came out and said the economy would NOT prevent the Reds from doing what they wanted to do.
They then proceeded to WASTE money on signing retread, scrap heap players like Willy Taveras, Jerry Hairston Jr, Jonny Gomes, Laynce Nix, Jacque Jones and Daryl Ward.
So, let's see. Jocketty says the Reds are STILL looking for a hitter and the economy hasn't gotten any better, the Reds attendance and sponsorships have fallen and the team is one Game under .500, 4 1/2 Games out of First place and have five teams ahead of them in the Wild Card race.
I see that Javier Valentin has been Designated For Assignment so THAT would work out PERFECTLY for the Reds; They get a cheap, scrap heap player who has previously played for Toothpick Baker and who could be the third Catcher on the team.
Yep, sounds about right......
Posted by: ctownboy | June 24, 2009 at 01:35 AM
I'll tell you exactly how I value players. Harang is two years removed from posting back to back 16 win seasons, finishing in the top 5 of the Cy Young voting in the NL, finishing in the top 10 in NL in strikeouts, and continues to be one of the most under-supported pitchers in baseball. His velocity is the same, his ERA is the same, the only difference is that now he's backed by a AAA offense and defense, hence his record.
I look at Kemp as an arbitration-nearing, sub .900 OPS every-year-he-plays CF who will be among an OF that includes Manny (un-sittable), Ethier (better than Kemp), and Pierre (untradeable with his contract). There will be an outfielder for the Dodgers that is the odd man out, and I'd like to offer Harang for Kemp.
If the Reds took on one of the horrendous expiring contracts of a Dodgers pitcher (Schmidt!!) and Kemp, swapping Harang/Masset makes a good deal of sense, considering the Dodgers are making a play for a deep playoff run with a pitching staff that is as un-proven and young as it gets (Broxton, Kershaw, Billingsley). Harang is your veteran starter.
Posted by: Kevin Mitchell is Batman | June 24, 2009 at 06:29 AM
Homer Bailey has shown that he can pitch at AAA. Hell, Jeremy Sowers can do that.
Posted by: MickS | June 24, 2009 at 06:30 AM
Yeah, Bailey is at least what the Indians would want for DeRosa.
Look at what they got for Blake last year.....and DeRosa is having just as good a year and can play more positions....
And if I'm not mistaken....Bailey is out of minor league options (was optioned to the minors in 2007, 2008, and 2009)....so that could really hurt his value...
Also not a fan of moving Phillips to SS. He's overrated at 2B as it is. He belongs there, not SS.
Obviously if you can't find a SS then it's a possible move, but better to look for a real SS than move Phillips.
I wouldn't say Pierre is untradealbe with how he's played.....someone will take a chance on him I bet.
And expiring contracts? This isn't basketball...
Also....not sure Frazier is a 3B option for the Reds now. He hasn't played there at all this year. He's been moved to the OF (been playing LF). Not sure I fully understand the move as he seemed to handle 3B 'ok'.
In the OF, his value takes a bit of a hit as far as trade value goes...
Posted by: Hermie13 | June 24, 2009 at 07:49 AM
Not gonna happening.....
But what about a Shin-Soo Choo for Johnny Cueto deal?
If the Reds do actually think Bailey can perform, then bring him up. Volquez whould be back in a bit as well.
They'd then still have a pretty solid 1-3 with Harang, Volquez, and Arroyo.
Indians aren't gonna trade Choo....but I'd consider it if it meant getting a stud pitcher.
Kind of like the Delomon Young-Garza deal a few years back.....
An OF of Stubbs, Bruce, and Choo over the next 4 years for the Reds would be pretty amazing...
And a rotation of Lee, Cueto, Westbrook, Huff, and Carmona (if he gets his act together) could be good enough to get the Indians to the playoffs and World Series in 2010.
Their offense would take a hit....but they're 3rd in the leauge in runs scored with Hafner, Grady, and Cabrera missing significant time. And Peralta has only 4 HRs. If those 4 play anywhere close to where they can, and LaPorta steps up, the offense will be fine.
Again, not happening......but wonder who would balk first at that trade.....
Posted by: Hermie13 | June 24, 2009 at 07:56 AM
Reds wouldnt trade Cueto for anything. They wont make the same mistake the dodgers made with Pedro.
Posted by: GmblngPtchr20 | June 24, 2009 at 08:14 AM
cueto has been a top twenty NL pitcher and we would trade him for a guy who the indians have been waiting to put it together for a couple of years? no thanks
Posted by: redsincebirth | June 24, 2009 at 08:16 AM
you can have arroyo though he would at least eat some innings for you
Posted by: redsincebirth | June 24, 2009 at 08:16 AM
Cueto is likely the very LAST person the Reds would trade so even suggesting him is laughable. He's 23 with a 2.55 ERA. I agree the Reds biggest need is a long term SS or a left fielder. They've committed 7M to Encarnacion for the next 2 years, so he's going to be here barring a trade (and who's going to trade for a guy that hasn't played in months). The Reds do NOT need a starting pitcher so any of those moves aren't going to happen either.
Posted by: Slasher | June 24, 2009 at 09:11 AM
The only way the Reds trade Cueto to the Indians is if they were getting back Sizemore and Lee.
Corner OFs that hit like Choo are a dime a dozen. Pitchers like Cueto are very very rare.
I believe Fraizer was moved to LF because it was the most open position on the ML team at the time. His future should be at 3B though since his glove is likely better then any of the others that the Reds currently have at the position and his bat will also play better there then as a corner OF.
I believe EE does have some value, just not as much as he had at the start of the year, perhaps if he comes back hot it will jump up.
I still think that a EE for Sanchez deal would work for both clubs and since neither player is playing up to their potential it would be something that I could see happening. EE for Delmon Young could also be a option.
Posted by: schellis | June 24, 2009 at 09:20 AM
Honestly, I don't know who the Reds would buy. They're getting decent offense from the OF, IF they use their internal resources correctly. They need 3B/SS help, and I don't know who's got that. Tejada? I doubt the Stros are selling because McLane's a moron.
1- Release Willy Taveras. Seriously. He sucks. Call up Stubbs.
2- The Nix/Gomes platoon is really really effective, if its done correctly. Nix v. RHP, Gomes v. LHP, although I do let Gomes get a few v. groundballing righties.
3- EE for Delmon Young? That's an awful deal for the Reds. Young has a shitton of potential, but EE has shown a lot more at the MLB level. On the EE for Sanchez note, if the objective is to trade EE for a pitcher, I'd like to see the Reds and A's match up.
Posted by: melonis rex | June 24, 2009 at 09:45 AM
While he might not be available, why not go after Ryan Zimmerman to play 3rd?
-Flip EE to the A's for some minor leagures the Nats would want.
-Start with those A's prospects and Volquez for Zimmerman.
-Bailey needs to be given a shot full time at the 4th spot in the rotation, now is a good time to do that.
If that doesn't work I agree with previous posters, go after Stephen Drew. He would be a great longterm fit at SS for the Reds.
Posted by: carolina03 | June 24, 2009 at 10:10 AM
The problem with EE is that he's been horrible all around this year, and is a known horrible glove on top of that. Chances are excellent that if the Reds were to get anything resembling talent its going to be some other teams problem child.
Which is why I said Delmon Young or Sanchez. Sometimes it just takes the right staff to get the most out of a player, and the wrong staff to get the least.
Tejada is readily available but I don't think he's a SS any more and that is where Dusty would play him. When making moves you also have to factor in what Dusty would do. Tejada is also a shell of his former self offensively and isn't going to get better over night. Unless the Reds can get him on the cheap and have the Astros pick up some of the contract I want nothing to do with him.
I would love to bring Zimmerman to Cincinnati, but I would see the Red Sox trading Youkilis before I would see the Nationals dealing Zimmerman, he's the face of their franchise
However I would be open to dealing Alonso, Maloney, Thompson, EE and perhaps a fifth player for Zimmerman if the Reds were granted a extension window.
Zimmerman is close to the perfect player for the Reds needs this year. Long term I think a SS is the larger need.
Posted by: schellis | June 24, 2009 at 11:08 AM
Matt Maloney + Dallas Buck/minor league relief prospect for DeRosa.
Who hangs up the phone?
Posted by: melonis rex | June 24, 2009 at 11:30 AM
Cleveland hangs up the phone because they realize Maloney is Jeremy Sowers part II. He can get out AAA hitters but doesn't have the stuff to pitch every fifth day for the big league club. The Indians could get a better package elsewhere.
That being said, it depends on the other prospect. Buck doesn't get it done b/c of injury history.
And, I don't think DeRosa does anything for the Reds. As someone else said, the Gomes/Nix platoon is working very well. That means DeRosa will have to play third, and unless they can get rid of EE, you have a roster problem on your hands.
The Reds answer is to move EE for whatever they can get in a three way deal for a stud 3B, or go after a SS.
Posted by: carolina03 | June 24, 2009 at 11:48 AM
The time to trade for Zimmerman was when Leather Pants Bowden was the GM. The Reds could have offered Edwin E and Homer Bialey and asked for Zimmerman and Josh Willingham.
This would have allowed Bowden to add a couple of MORE Reds to his collection while giving the Reds a younger, less expensive Third Baseman and an inexpensive power hitting Outfielder (which they STILL need).
Posted by: ctownboy | June 24, 2009 at 11:57 AM
The Reds will not trade Cueto or Volquez they are untouchable, but Homer Bailey and EE are on the block, but I have no idea who would want either head case?????
Posted by: Vottomatic | June 24, 2009 at 01:23 PM
Matt Kemp is NOT going to Cincinnati for anybody that the Reds have short of Cueto. Especially when Kemp has been a key part of the Dodgers current success. For Arroyo or Harang? Keep dreaming, really.
Short of Cueto, Halladay, Greinke, Haren, and a couple other young starting pitchers, I can't think of many guys that'd bring Kemp in return when you factor in contract status and the Dodgers current needs. Hanley Ramirez would probably be the only position player that'd get Kemp, and even that is questionable (because of Furcal's contract, potential impact on clubhouse chemistry, and questions about Pierre's ability to sustain his offense and his weak arm for CF).
I expect Kemp is on his way to becoming the best CF in baseball in the next couple years. He probably in the top 5 already.
And, no, Ethier is not better than Kemp. Kemp hits for higher average, has more speed, plays better defense, and he will develop more power than Ethier (already pretty close). Ethier is more likely to be moved than Kemp (though I don't see that happening, either). Ethier is a good player, but he's very streaky. Ethier will also hit free agency sooner, and judging by our experience with him going to arbitration, I'd say he's less likely to remain a Dodger long-term than Kemp. Kemp came up through the Dodger farm system, too, while Ethier came via Milton Bradley to the A's.
The Dodgers don't need to play Pierre because of his contract. He was on the bench over half of last season, almost every game before Manny was suspended, and will return to the bench if he's not traded.
The Dodgers payroll this season is a good $20m or so less than last season, so salary is not a big issue. We don't need help with the $8m or whatever is left on Schmidt's contract.
Posted by: dodgersdan | June 24, 2009 at 02:09 PM
Matt Maloney + Dallas Buck/minor league relief prospect for DeRosa.
Who hangs up the phone?
Posted by: melonis rex | June 24, 2009 at 11:30 AM
Reds. Maloney is good and has been pitching well consistently in our minors for years. He doesn't walk a lot and strikes out a ton of batters. Personally i believe he could be a decent #4 lefty type of pitcher who battles his way into wining. buck is whatever but high upside. he can be part of a deal but not Maloney for De Rosa..hes good but not incredible.
Posted by: GmblngPtchr20 | June 24, 2009 at 08:52 PM
The Mistake by the lake will want way too much for DeRosa right now, if a deal does get done it will be much closer to the dead line.
Saying that i feel Maloney or Homer plus a prospect could get a deal done but by the deadline the Reds could be in selling mode...
Posted by: Vottomatic | June 24, 2009 at 11:28 PM