MLB Rumors - MLB Trade Rumors
Subscribe to MLB Trade Rumors using RSS
Home     Contact     About     Advertise     Archives     Widget     Twitter      RSS Usage

« Oswalt Would Not Pitch For White Sox | Main | Yankees Likely To Part With Matsui After Season »

Knobler On Brewers, Vazquez

After chatting with GM Doug Melvin, Danny Knobler of CBS Sports points out that the Brewers could make a deal even though they're not in trade talks at the moment. As Melvin says, the team has "done it every year." Melvin says the challenge for the Brewers, who could pursue pitching or an infielder, "is identifying what [they] need." Knobler identifies three barriers the Brewers would have to overcome should they decide to pursue Jake Peavy:

  • The Brewers would have to agree to part with top prospects.
  • Owner Mark Attanasio would have to agree to take on Peavy's contract. 
  • Peavy would have to agree to come to Milwaukee. 
On another note, Knobler spoke to a "scout familiar with the Braves" who suggests that Atlanta could consider dealing Javier Vazquez, who makes $11.5MM this year and next, for a big bat to help out the struggling Braves offense. 


Comments

Would Braves be interested in Corey Hart?

I surprised their considering dealing Vazquez. He should easily be with 1 or 0 losses if the damn lineup or bullpen wouldn't have blown up. While we will have to make a change to fit in Huddy and Hanson, I don't think that timne is in July.

JV has been the Braves best pitcher so far this year. He 2nd in Ks top 10 in IP and Top 20 in ERA. IF they could get a Stud OFer right NOW than by all means you have to sell high and pull the trigger. Though I wonder if the Braves would consider trading Lowe first to bigger market teams that can take on his salary that is in need for SP (Angels/White Sox/Texas) for a Big Bat +. I would find it more attractive long term if Lowe was move because of this contract versus JV production he will give you till his contract expires after 10' in which the braves may feel better in having a Huddy/JV/JJ/Hanson/KK moving forward. Make it interesting for the Rumor Mill...

We could use DeRosa AND a guy like Holliday or Dye.

My top five things I'd like to see happen:

1. Trade for DeRosa

2. DFA Garret Anderson

3. Trade Jeff Bennet

4. Trade for Holliday, then try like hell to get an extension(I know he's a Boras client)


5. Trade Gonzo for a SU man, then sign Soriano to an extension.

Trading Vazquez for Corey Hart would make a ton of sense for both teams. The Braves have a glut of starting pitching but desperately need an outfielder. The Brewers need starting pitching and are said to be shopping Hart. Looks like a match made in heaven to me.

DLowe has been just as dominant. He'd be the LAST guy I'd wanna trade from the starting staff. Now with that being said, please PWHJORT, don't suggest trading Jurrjens and please don't think we'd evr get Hard-hittin Carlos Quentin. Not gonna happen. However, if we did in fact trade Lowe to the Rangers, just for imagination, I'd ask for Hamilton or Kinsler. Obviously, we'd have to throw in prospects and KJ/Francoeur depending on who we trade for, but the pitchign-hungry Rangers could become desperate....

DLowe has been just as dominant. He'd be the LAST guy I'd wanna trade from the starting staff. Now with that being said, please PWHJORT, don't suggest trading Jurrjens and please don't think we'd evr get Hard-hittin Carlos Quentin. Not gonna happen. However, if we did in fact trade Lowe to the Rangers, just for imagination, I'd ask for Hamilton or Kinsler. Obviously, we'd have to throw in prospects and KJ/Francoeur depending on who we trade for, but the pitchign-hungry Rangers could become desperate....

"Trading Vazquez for Corey Hart would make a ton of sense for both teams. The Braves have a glut of starting pitching but desperately need an outfielder. The Brewers need starting pitching and are said to be shopping Hart. Looks like a match made in heaven to me."

Milwaukee would have to give up more than Hart to get Vazquez, since he is worth more than Hart.

Trading Vazquez for Corey Hart would make a ton of sense for both teams. The Braves have a glut of starting pitching but desperately need an outfielder. The Brewers need starting pitching and are said to be shopping Hart. Looks like a match made in heaven to me.

Posted by: BravesAllTheWay | June 01, 2009 at 09:25 AM
--------------------------

If they trade Vazquez for Hart straight up, Wren should be fired on the spot. If they insist on moving Vazquez then they need to aim higher than Corey Hart.

I don't know why they'd even consider trading Vazquez anyway. He's been that team's ace more than Lowe. If its to make room for Hanson then dump Glavine but for the love of crap do NOT move Vazquez. If anything, they should be extending him rather than shopping.

"JV has been the Braves best pitcher so far this year."

Uh, no he hasn't. Jurrjens wins that award, even after his last start. Javy's been great, though. I'd like to keep him, as he's the only traditional strikeout guy they have, but he is the logical choice as tradebait if they go that way - solid pitcher, short-but-not-too-short commitment.

I understand that the braves do need a productive bat to put in the OF. However, I think that we would need more of a return than Corey Hart, even though I would get over a JV for Hart deal real quickly. I just would want a little something more in the deal, but do not know specifically what that would be.

With that being said, since our OF sucks so bad, we do not need to get a big difference maker to make a productive move. I think a person like spilborghs, byrd, scott, or derosa would be good to go after.

But again, the idea of trading vazquez is a new one, and one that I do have reservations about because he is pitching so well.

NL East,

1. I like the idea of trading for DeRosa but the Indians are said to be looking for a top young starter in return. That is too much for him.

2. Anderson also won't be DFA'd. He is a good hitter who has just gotten off to a rough start.

3. There is no one that would want Jeff Bennett...he is terrible.

4. No way to Holliday. The A's will ask for a load of prospects in return. Since the Braves have only a slim chance at making the playoffs why give up prospects for a rental. It would be the Tex deal all over again. Boras clients never sign extensions. He will go to the highest bidder this offseason.

5. I agree with this idea. I think Soriano is the best closer on the team. Gonzo was said to have had a lot of interest from other teams over the summer. Maybe the Rays would be interested. Either way, either Gonzo or Soriano should be traded.

Another obstacle is that I just do not see the braves trading away a source of consistent success for them with how inconsistent our team is.

Trade Vazquez, and you arrive at almost the same point that the Braves were in last season. With Kawakami not producing as hoped, and one win from the 5th starter spot all year, it would make zero sense to dump a quality starter, especially for a guy like Corey Hart...Whom the Brewers wouldn't trade in the first place anyway. The only logical moves would be to trade a young, "big league ready arm", or swap Francoeur and a minor league prospect for Hart as a "change of scenery" move..Which still doesn't make sense for the Brewers.

Who here thinks, if he isn't re-signed, we'll sign Bay? He may cost a little and we know the Braves had interest in him. The chances of him ever hitting the open market is slim to none, however, IMO. He is too good a player for Boston to pass up and overpay for Holliday/ another lesser value option, IMO.


With Heyward being ready in about two-three years(msybe four), I would rather sign a short term option like DeRosa or just stick with Diaz/Anderson/??? as a platoon.

Who here thinks, if he isn't re-signed, we'll sign Bay? He may cost a little and we know the Braves had interest in him. The chances of him ever hitting the open market is slim to none, however, IMO. He is too good a player for Boston to pass up and overpay for Holliday/ another lesser value option, IMO.


With Heyward being ready in about two-three years(msybe four), I would rather sign a short term option like DeRosa or just stick with Diaz/Anderson/??? as a platoon.

Atlanta could consider dealing Javier Vazquez to help out the struggling Braves offense.

-I really think this needs to happen. He's got a high SO rate so he's got value; he's certainly got more value than Kawakami who most likely cannot be unloaded. And NO, he has not "been the Braves best pitcher so far this year." That assumption is laughable for obvious reasons. Don't forget: moving Javy also moves his contract.

I really don't think C. Hart is the answer. Regardless, the Braves aren't in the same bind other teams are in (ie in need of pitching), so there's no need to make a desperate deal.

I read that the Braves tried to talk the Brewers into trading Hart to them over the summer last year. That's why I think the Vazquez for Hart deal makes sense.

The Braves got Vazquez for little of nothing. The only player of value they gave up was Tyler Flowers...and since he is a DH/catcher he would have never played in Atlanta anyway.

If the Braves trade Vazquez now it will be selling high, which is a good thing.

I like Vazquez...I have really enjoyed watching him pitch this year. He has been dominant at times. But the Braves have Hanson/Medlen/Morton in addition to Glavine......all fighting for the 5th spot in the rotation. Someone has to go and Vazquez makes the most sense. Kawakami won't be traded because he is their inroad to the Japanese market. Jurrjens, Hanson and Lowe won't be traded. Medlen only makes the league minimum so why trade him.

Trading Vazquez for a hitter makes sense. The Braves can't afford to add any payroll right now and Vazquez makes over 11 million. Trading him frees up that 11 million to add a hitter. Maybe they trade him to get prospects...and flip the prospects to another team for a hitter....but I am guessing that he is their best trading chip right now.

....With Kawakami not producing as hoped...

Posted by: OldOak33 | June 01, 2009 at 09:37 AM

Actually, this isn't correct. Kawakami has been pretty good lately. He has given up three runs or less in his last five starts. He really has only had one awful outing the entire season. The problem is that the team is not scoring runs for him. They have only scored a total of 15 runs in his 9 starts. That is less than two runs per start. That has got to be one of the worst run support of any starter in MLB.

jimmyeallaby,

I agree the Braves should expect more than Corey Hart for Vazquez. But trading him now makes all the sense in the world. He's done exactly what they've expected from him and is their most logical trading chip.

Lowe and Jurrjens can anchor the rotation. Medlen may have gotten the yips out of his system but if he hasn't, Glavine is ready to take a turn and Hanson is still dealing.

And Hudson's another 10 weeks or so from returning.

The team doesn't need starters. It needs an impact hitter. And Vazquez can be the centerpiece of a deal that delivers him.

But you are right, Hart's not the prize they should be seeking.

The Braves knew what JV's contract was when they traded for him, why, after 2 months of a season would the Braves get rid of him? Especially if he's producing? He's got to be one of the most underrated starters in the league right now.
The speculation that Kawakami is a "gateway" to the Japanese market is pointless. Money talks, and if the Braves got rid of Kawakami, they could easily buy out another #5 guy for 7 mil a year and call it a day. I bet the Braves wish they could move Kawakami right now, and believe me, it wouldn't be because they're scared of burning bridges to the Japanese market.
Cheap, affordable, effective young arms are what many teams are craving this year. That's why they'd be traded for, and traded hard for.

It's not the fact that Kawakami is pitching horribly, it's that he's pitching horribly for his contract, averaging just over five and a half innings per start (that's a terrible stat when considering the fact that he's had more rest than any other starter).

Medlen at 395,000 > Kawakami @7mil
Morton at 405,000 > Kawakami @7mil
Hanson at 395,000 > Kawakami @ 7mil

Trading Vaz is not a good idea. When you replace Failcoeur with Diaz (who goes 2-5) then suddenly we score 9 runs. When we have Kelly, Escobar, Chipper, and BMac all healthy at the top of the order we will score some runs. Throw in GA now coming out of his slump and hitting well (HR yesterday!) and continued sold hitting from Kotch all we need is someone not terrible like Diaz in right.

With that said I think if we can trade away Failcoeur's contract to anyone and get even next to nothing in return then we should go after DeRosa. He would give us a solid RH bat to play RF and give us some power and flexibility (with Diaz taking over in RF) at 3B when chipper misses time. I could see Charlie Morton and a lesser younger arm getting sent to CLE for him as Morton has right now MLB stuff and is expendable.

Ink Stained,

One of the reason's that the Braves have a surplus of pitching is Vazquez...And he is a HUGE reason for this.

I don't think it's fair to compare stats of a guy who hasn't pitched but two months worth of hitters in the U.S. to guys who have played all their life against them. While he needs to take a little bit better command, he still has room to learn and with a full season and McDowell's help, that shouldn't be a problem.

Morton is entirely too much to give up for 4 months of Mark Derosa.

When you're paid 7 plus a year, anything's fair.

OldOak, the Braves will NOT be trading Kawakami. He is doing exactly what they wanted for them - Braves merchandise is selling like mad in Japan. And the next time a young Japanese player, like Junichi Tazawa, comes to MLB he will think about the Braves and Kawakami....not only the Red Sox and Daisuke ..... or Ichiro and the Mariners.

You're right, he isn't pitching enough innings for his salary....but this is just his first 1/3 season playing MLB. Japanese teams have a 6 man rotation and he is used to more rest. I am guessing that as he gets used to the American game his stamina will improve.

It doesn't really make sense to me to move JV before the end of this season, unless the braves intend on giving up on this season, and taking prospects. If the braves do trade Javy they need to get 2 outfielders not one to compete. I like Hanson, Medlen, and even Glavine and am fine running any of them out there, but only with a formidable lineup (Glavine isn't what he used to be and the kids are gonna have growing pains). If we could get DeRosa for Scott Diamond plus a lower level guy, and then trade Javy for another bat I'd be all for it. Of course this would require moving Frenchy. I just don't see us getting it worked out this year. With 4 guys as potential 1-2s, two top prospects, and KK as a solid number 5, this could be one heck of an offseason. Personally KK is the only one I'd be willing to move right now.

On another note, I really wish the Bravos would lock down Soriano. I'm just afraid the ridiculous 6.1M he's making this year will set too high of an expectation for him. However strong closers still got paid well last year, and its not inconceivable to see him getting 7 or so over a couple three years, and with his injury history I'd want absolutely no part of that.

Morton is entirely too much to give up for 4 months of Mark Derosa.

Posted by: tsweet9000 | June 01, 2009 at 10:07 AM

Agreed....that is WAY too much to give up for DeRosa...much less Morton plus someone else.

I have thought the signing of Kawakami was a huge mistake from the start..There's an article on the AJC.com site about the Braves "eyeing" Dero..

The Braves won't trade Kawakami because no one will take his contract on...Not because the Braves won't part with him.

On another note, I really wish the Bravos would lock down Soriano. I'm just afraid the ridiculous 6.1M he's making this year will set too high of an expectation for him. However strong closers still got paid well last year, and its not inconceivable to see him getting 7 or so over a couple three years, and with his injury history I'd want absolutely no part of that.

Posted by: bravo84 | June 01, 2009 at 10:09 AM


You know, I kind of think the same thing. I love Soriano and think he is much more dominant as a closer than Gonzalez. For some reason, the Braves seem to be in love with Gonzo. They both have had TJ surgery so they both have injury risks to them.

Given a choice I keep Soriano over Gonzo...but you are right 7 mil a year is too much for him....or Gonzalez.

The Braves won't trade Kawakami because no one will take his contract on...Not because the Braves won't part with him.

Posted by: OldOak33 | June 01, 2009 at 10:15 AM

We will have to agree to disagree on this one. With several teams desperately in need of starting pitchers - they easily could trade him if they wanted to do that.

I tend to like the Vasquez trade idea if we can get Hanson up and see what he can do before we trade JV away. In this pitching depleted market, Vasquez can be a power right handed arm that isnt out htere.

The Kawakami signing was a desperation move & yeah, it looked like a mistake, up until his amazing outing against Roy Halladay a few weeks ago. Regardless, right now his value is low & his salary is high, so he cannot really be considered tradable.

@Tsweet and BravesAllTheWay

Morton is the max I would give for DeRosa as he would be a perfect fit for our needs RF/3B with above average OPS. I offer him only because he is our most expendable of our MLB ready arms that CLE is demanding.

If they would go for something like Redmond, Diamond and throw in arm for DeRosa that would definately be a good deal.

There's an article on the AJC.com site about the Braves "eyeing" Dero..

Posted by: OldOak33 | June 01, 2009 at 10:14 AM


To be honest the best thing on there is Mar DeRosa's wife, Heidi...Frank get him here, I wanna meet her

Just for the Kawakami knockers I'd like to share this tibit of info. When given an extra day rest he is 2-2 with an ERA of 3.00 and has a K/9 of 9.75. Not to mention the fact that he hasn't given up more than 3 runs in any of those starts. I'm not sure whether that means he'll be fine when he adjusts to the 5-man rotation or if he just needs to be the number 5 so he can have extra rest more often, but I guarantee you if I was trying to trade him I'd spin the crap out of that. I do think he's overpaid and wish that money had gone too hitting, but I don't think that contract is immovable right now. In the offseason when FAs are available it might be, but with all the pitching starved teams out there he could definitely be moved. Not sure what the return would be, but there would be takers. At the deadline the braves will have already paid him 5.8M of his 23M contracts. 17.2M isn't enough of a committment to scare off a pitching starved team.

@Tsweet and BravesAllTheWay

Morton is the max I would give for DeRosa as he would be a perfect fit for our needs RF/3B with above average OPS. I offer him only because he is our most expendable of our MLB ready arms that CLE is demanding.

If they would go for something like Redmond, Diamond and throw in arm for DeRosa that would definately be a good deal.

Posted by: bbxxj | June 01, 2009 at 10:28 AM

Morton would be starting for a lot of teams right now. If the Braves trade him it should be for a young hitter, not an old guy or a rental. I like DeRosa and would love for the Braves to trade for him....but not if they have to give up one of their top young pitchers to do so.

The fact that he NEEDS that extra day is the problem Bravo84...It's only the first day of June, and he NEEDS that extra day..or more

He's been pitching in a 6-Man rotation, of courses he "NEEDS" it. Most of us probably eat atleast twice a day if not three times, and if you miss one of those meals it sure feels like you NEED it. Because your body is used to getting that meal. But if you stop getting breakfast ever, your body gets used to it and you don't NEED it anymore. Let him get used to the league before you start labeling him, as you said "it's only the first day of June".

If that's your way of reasoning this situation, I hope the arm of a veteran Japanese pitcher can adjust as quickly as a stomach can

The Braves are an impact bat away from being better than a .500 team.

Morton's not going to get you that bat, because his value is based entirely on his potential. Unless the player you get is a veteran who performs above expectations or a kid (like Morton) who hasn't yet produced at the big league level.

Vazquez could get you that bat. It makes sense to move him now rather than after the season for one reason: Wren invested a significant amount of money for starting pitching in the off-season to win in 2009. If they're one piece away from contending, and can add pitching from within to compensate for Vazquez's departure (and between Hanson, Glavine, Morton, and Medlen they can) then there's no downside to getting a proven hitter for JV as soon as practical.

Otherwise the other moves Wren made in the winter make no sense.

And DeRo for Vazquez is only a good deal if there's another move for an extra hitter in the works. (And Cleveland picks up all of JV's remaning salary.)

Ink Stained,

You're basically reaching the conclusion that the Braves traded for Vazquez to trade him in 2 months..
It makes no sense. First off, Medlen, Morton, or Hanson are all "IF's"..If they fill in and pitch well, if the can pick up where Javy left off..They need the rotation they have now and some (KK and 5th spot pitchers need improving). Maybe Hanson or Medlen or Morton could fill that in, but none of them would fill the void left by Javy's departure. The Braves will trade Vazquez if they're out of contention, but it Frank Wren said last off season that he would get two, frontline guys..enter Vazquez and Lowe..The bat is an addition to the current roster, not a trade out of the current roster.

Ink-stained scribe,

Agreed completely. That's an interesting trade: JV for MD. Both are pending FA's and both could help a team that is contending/trying to contend. As you said, if that is the trade, hopefully there is another move fixing to happen or something.

One bat won't fix our anemic offense and make up for a drop in our production from our starters. Sure we can throw Medlin, Glavine, Hanson, even Morton out there, but they won't be nearly strong in the rotation with two of them on the mound. If we bring up Hanson soon and can get 4 or 5 strong starts under his belt I may change my mind, but until then I think it takes more than one good bat if we subtract one strong starter at the same time, and if we're talking about Corey Hart I'll pass. Atleast if we can't get that other bat. I wouldn't mind moving Vasquez so we could afford to add Dye. That makes sense, but we obviously won't be making that trade straight up...

Ink Stained, I totally agree with you. The Braves are a solid hitter away from being a contender in the NL East. The Phillies have pitching problems, the Mets are old, the Marlins are young and falling apart, and the Nats are one of the worst teams in baseball.

There is one trade that would make sense for both teams but would never happen. The Nationals need pitching but have great hitting. The Braves are just the opposite. How about trading Vazquez for Adam Dunn. They both make close to the same amount of money and are signed for the same amount of years. Both teams would improve their weakness and neither would have to give up good young prospects to do it. I'm not a big fan of Adam Dunn but someone that can hit home runs in the middle of the lineup would sure be nice, especially with all of the Braves' high OBP buys like Escobar, KJ, Kotchman, etc.

One interesting chip we have is Cody Johnson. He doesn't project to have a spot in Atlanta with Heyward, Hernandez, Schafer, among others. He is raking it at Myrtle Beach, that could just be a small sample size, instead of AA or AAA. He could easily become a 30 HR guy, just not with the Braves.

OldOak33,

Don't put words in my mouth. Nowhere did I say or even suggest that the Braves intended to trade JV this soon after getting him. Wren hoped that the roster he assembled coming out of camp would hit well enough to support the fine pitching staff he built.

Doing that meant a full rebound by Frenchy, Schafer not playing like a rookie, GA being healthy and productive, and Chipper not missing a lot of time from injuries. Wren has pretty much said that recently: He hoped the offense would do better than most people expected.

You can argue whether that was a good plan or a bad plan, but what's clear now is that it hasn't fully worked.

So if you're a GM who's invested a lot in winning this year, what do you do? You make adjustments. If trading Vazquez nets you a hitter and improves your chances of winning this year, it's one thing you consider.

Wow this is awful. A lot of you are saying we should break up our strongest aspect of our team in order to fix the team. Why would we trade JV who can go deep into every game? Everyone is talking about trading him and using Hanson/Medlen/Glavine. Hanson and Medlen are both giant "IFs" and we don't know how they'll fair in the bigs. Glavine will have an extremely hard time going even 5 innings, he had trouble doing that before the surgery. All trading him is doing is creating another gaping hole in our team. The only thing that makes sense is to trade prospects who don't really have much of a future in Atlanta such as Morton/C. Johnson/Locke for an impact bat. Not another average hitter like derosa/spillborghs/hart.

Please please please stop trying to fill a hole by creating another, it's ridiculous.

Wow this is awful. A lot of you are saying we should break up our strongest aspect of our team in order to fix the team. Why would we trade JV who can go deep into every game? Everyone is talking about trading him and using Hanson/Medlen/Glavine. Hanson and Medlen are both giant "IFs" and we don't know how they'll fair in the bigs. Glavine will have an extremely hard time going even 5 innings, he had trouble doing that before the surgery. All trading him is doing is creating another gaping hole in our team. The only thing that makes sense is to trade prospects who don't really have much of a future in Atlanta such as Morton/C. Johnson/Locke for an impact bat. Not another average hitter like derosa/spillborghs/hart.

Please please please stop trying to fill a hole by creating another, it's ridiculous.

I have to disagree with those saying that the Braves need an impact bat in the OF to be competitive. I believe all we need is a good bat. After very slow starts Johnson and Anderson are turning it around. With the addition of a player like DeRosa or even starting Diaz in right we can win the NL East with our pitching.

After a slow start look at the May stats:

2B 1. Johnson - .828 OPS
SS 2. Escobar - .916 OPS
3B 3. Jones - .937 OPS
C 4. McCann - 1.056 OPS
LF 5. Anderson - .286 BA (still not much power)
RF 6. Diaz - .953 OPS (addition by subtraction of Failcoeur's .528 OPS)
1B 7. Kotchman - .703 OPS (.798 through the first month)
CF 8. Schafer - .427 OPS (whatever..plays elite defense and had a April .854OPS)

Suport that offense with a staff of:

Lowe
Jurrjens
Vazquez
Hanson/Glavine
Kawakami (rested)

...and the playoff push late inning bulpen of:

Medlen
Hudson
Soriano
Gonzalez

Thats just a sick nasty staff supported by a pretty decent lineup.

bbxxj

So your going to bank on Diaz all year in RF?!?! I say we trade Vazquez, Francoeur and Freeman to the Rangers for Nelson Cruz and a PTBNL(Justin Smoak)

I'd keep Medlen in the rotation unless he absolutely crashes. So here's how my team would look.

Johnson
Escobar
Jones
McCann
Cruz
Anderson
Kotchman
Schafer

Lowe
Jurrjens
Kawakami
Hanson
Medlen

We'd still have Morton, Reyes, Glavine and Hudson(who'd be just like acquiring a SP at the deadline) if anyone in the rotation begans to slump.

Jay,

Right now, Vazquez is more valuable than Cruz, and Freeman is most likely untouchable.

BravesRed

Um.......I think Smoak has more value that your not giving him credit for. Do you know who Justin Smoak is?

The Braves won't be trading Freeman. He is the power hitting first baseman that the team has needed for the last ten years.

im gonna be honest i just wish the Braves would do something soon. because i am getting very tired of an inconsistant braves team where they score 2 in one game then the next day break out 9 runs. i just want some stability and i think someone like Derosa would bring that to Atlanta. i just hope that Wren can get something done before we are out of the race in the NL East.
Do you really want to give up a pretty consistant SP (JV) for Hart, who is in a serious slump right now, and in danger of losing an everyday pos and could be platooning?

We def. need to keep JV. Derosa is only batting .266, why would we want him? (again)

Here's a thought....We try to trade Morton, Medlen,Locke and Hernadez (maybe a little more?) to the Orioles for Adam Jones and Luke Scott? Jones is batting .344 with 11 HR and Scott is batting .325 with 11 HR. Both play outfield,are signed pretty cheap, and would sure up the braves lineup by leaps and bounds!

Trading Vazquez makes sense? Absolutely.

Trading him for Corey Hart? Oh god no. Corey Hart is not that good. He had one really good year in 2007, but besides that, he hasn't had another season where he's been worth more than 1 WAR. Considering arbitration increases, he'll probably be worth less than his arb salary next year.

Vazquez is easily a 4-5 WAR player.

BravesAllTheWay

Do you know anything about Smoak either? It's evident that you guys don't!

Trading Vazquez makes sense, but there is ZERO reason for the Braves to trade Vazquez unless they're getting a young, good, cost-controlled, and under Braves control for at least 2 years bat.

Vazquez is probably one of the most underrated players in baseball.

i dont think that Balt. is gna part ways with both Jones and Scott. i honestly dont see them parting ways with Jones at all. i really like Scott in Atl. even more than DeRosa. i say go get him. i wish we could get both Jones and Scott. but i dont see that happening.

Adam Jones is NOT going anywhere. Period. Teams generally do NOT trade their young superstars who are controlled for long periods of time.

i just said he wouldnt be going anywhere.

it would be a nice dream tho.

Stark has a piece up saying that our entire rotation and Hanson are off limits according to his sources and that we would demand a significant return for any of Reyes, Morton, or Medlen.

Corey Hart for Vaz, really?!? Do you want Jeff Francuoer part deux on our hands?? Only way im trading Vaz is for a BIG bat that is controllable. To me the Braves have two options, trade Vaz for a big right handed bat i.e. Nelson Cruz or Ryan Ludwick, or use guys like medlin,locke,morton, and gorkys to get two of hawpe,Derosa,Willingham,Hart. Then trade French for whatever we can get and DFA French.

DFA Anderson*

I can't see Texas Parting with Nelson Cruz but if they would Javy for him straight up seems fair. Also that would free up about 5 million this year and 11.5 next. Also with Francouer, Glavine and Anderson off the books the braves would have the funds(aproximately 18 milliom) to do one of two things I think will really help the franchise long term:
1) Sign Jason Bay for 4/60, in this economy that is a realistic deal and go ahead and give Jair Jurrjens an extension. Also this gives Heyward plenty of time to get ready and not be needed until 2011.
2) Sign Ankiel for 2/10, Valverde for 3/20, and Mark Derosa 2/12. This gives the braves a bona-fide closer, a respectable bat in LF and the best and most versatile bench in baseball by far.

I know both are unlikely but they make financial sense and improve the team for the long haul.

whoever said that vasquez and derosa have the same amount of years on there contracts is wrong. derosa is a free agent after this vasquez has another year left, that would be a horrible trade. derosa is a good hitter but they would have to through in choo with us throwing in a prospect. braves should have three trade options:hawpe,l scott or a dunn. dunn to the braves could work if they traded soriano and got rid of francour move diaz to right lineup would look like this
cf infante(schafer every 5th day or pitch running)
ss escobar
3b jones
lf dunn
c mccann
1b kotchman
2b johnson or prado
rf diaz
pitcher
they would save 6 mil on soriano 3 on francour
fact of the matter is they should have picked up dunn in the offseason anyways he sat on the open market forever. i dont wanna hear this crap about openning a road to the japennese market because the only good player from there is ichiro and even he is like 40 so big deal if they could keep soriano and trade kawakami and hanson should be up because he is past the super 2 thing right?

Luke Scott is 30 years old sign for about 2.4 M a year and is very productive. I think we could get him with Morton or Medlen and someone else

I think JV has done a great job thus far, however he is expendable. Medlin has done fine, Glavine will to fine, and I think Hanson will excel. Hudson shouldn't factor in because I think he will start in the pen. I think there are two perfect fits for a trade, baltimore and nationals for the two guys many of you have mentioned, Scott and Dunn. I think one outside the box option is Carlos Lee with Houston, the only holdup is his massive contract. But unlike the other two he is RH. I think JV would have to be included for contract reasons and then you can deal Francoeur for some minor leaguer. The $ virtually was for two years, and we are left with the 3rd.

Luke Scott/Mark DeRosa and Josh Willingham should be the Braves targets in the next month. Do not trade Vazquez, he is what gives us a great staff, that third guy that can be counted on. We cannot bank on Hanson and Medlen reaching their potential and being star pitchers. If it's financial, move Mike Gonzalez because a lefty setup man/closer will always be in demand. If we want to move Vazquez we should wait until the winter meetings because hudson can take his place next year. Also Matt Holliday, if his price tag has shrunk to what is rumored on this site, should be on the braves radar this offseason. 3 years for 36-48 million makes a ton of sense.

The Garret Anderson haters are getting annoying. He has been probably our most productive outfielder in May and since he got off the DL is hitting around .350-.375 with 2 homers and 15-18 RBI's. He is doing fine.

i hate the brewers go cubs

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment


Top Stories



Search MLBTR

Lijit Search

MLBTR Features



Recent Posts


MLBTR Mailing List

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner


Rumors By Team



Monthly Archives


Live Chats


Tuesdays at 2 p.m. CST



Site Map     Contact     About     Advertise     Privacy Policy     Widget     Twitter     Rss Feed


MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com.