![]() |
|
|
| |
« Discussion: Which Player Coming Back From Injury Helps The Most? | Main | Phillies Looking For Pitching, Can Add Payroll »
Ken Rosenthal of FOX Sports reports that the Red Sox discussed a trade that would have sent Takashi Saito to Texas for Hank Blalock. The idea lost traction once Josh Hamilton underwent surgery and David Ortiz began hitting better and it's not likely to be revived. However, "several" teams have interest in Saito, who the Red Sox might prefer to deal for a prospect. Here are more details from Rosenthal's column:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
As a Marniners fan, they have to trade Bedard. As good as he is, he is very fragile, and has been even before the brought him in. Even if they want to take a shot at the playoffs, there's no telling he will be available or healthy.
Posted by: Frejus | June 16, 2009 at 08:55 AM
Honestly, JJ Hardy for Brad Penny? What is Theo smoking? What a joke... I can imagine how that conversation went...
"Hey Doug, it's Theo."
"Oh hey Theo. What's going on."
"Well... I've been toying around with an offer in my head."
"Well I'm always up for listening. What's on your mind Theo?"
"How do you feel about Brad Penny?"
"(Yawn)"
"And how much do you value J.J. Hardy?"
*CLICK*
Posted by: MorneauVP | June 16, 2009 at 08:59 AM
You have to give it to the Red Sox... shooting high on a Brad Penny trade. Unfortunately for them though everyone else sees Penny for what he is: a 31 year old pitcher, signed to a 1 year deal, coming off arm troubles, pitching to a 5.32 ERA. They won't get anything significant in return... especially with all the scouting awareness of today.
Posted by: Russell | June 16, 2009 at 09:01 AM
You people still think Boston is shooting for the moon with Penny... How sad... Penny will only bring back something good, like a JJ Hardy, if he went along with something else that the brewers needed equally as bad, like Delcarmen to help fix the BP for them, certainly not by himself and MDC is under control for 3 years and could slide into the closer role quickly for the Brewers, or be the 8th inning guy on that staff easily.
Saito is the real surprise. I understand that many teams need closers and 8th inning guys and Saito has been brilliant this year after forgoing TJ surgery and instead taking the experimental injection route instead, even pitching back to back days a couple of times. Velocity has been back up in 93-94mph range, slider good, just like his old self again and he has a club option for next year with his contract also, so Saito is not a half year rental, unless any club wants him to be. His "final" salary with the clauses targets he will likely hit, will call for about 5.5M next year and that's not bad.
Posted by: johns | June 16, 2009 at 09:11 AM
MorneauVP: you hit it right on the head only I would replace (yawn) and *CLICK* with uncontrollable laughter and Melvin yelling in the background "HEY YOU GUYS, Epstein is on the phone and he wants us to give him Hardy for Brad Penny"
Seriously though, that couldnt have been the deal, there must have been a prospect going along with Penny to make that even a half worthy deal. Epstein isnt an idiot.
Posted by: xethicx | June 16, 2009 at 09:11 AM
Yes, because JJ Hardy's .207 batting average should command elite prospects.
He's as washed up as Penny.
Posted by: NiceShot | June 16, 2009 at 09:12 AM
Two bad months of Hardy's career make him washed up at the age of 26... tragic.
Hardy has a .228 BABIP, despite his LD% being almost identical to last season (15.5%) when his BABIP was .305. He's seeing just as many pitches per PA, and his GB% has actually gone down. Hardy will be fine.
Hardy's value is low, but it's not that low.
Posted by: MorneauVP | June 16, 2009 at 09:19 AM
Hardy has struggled at the plate so far this year, but is excellent defensively. He's only 26, as noted, so I doubt he's suddenly declining. He has historically been a streaky player, so I wouldn't be shocked if he suddenly goes on a hitting surge and gets his BA back to a respectable point. He still has quite a bit of value, as the Brewers have him under control through next season. Definitely worth more than a bottom tier starting pitcher like Penny. Also, while the Brewers do have Alcides Escobar waiting in the wings down in Nashville, it's not like they're in a rush to bring him up. They're in the drivers seat, and if other teams want a quality shortstop, they'll have to give up value to get one from Doug Melvin.
Posted by: Invader3K | June 16, 2009 at 09:31 AM
"Yes, because JJ Hardy's .207 batting average should command elite prospects.
He's as washed up as Penny."
Hardy is much more valuable than Penny. He is having a bad start that's all. Penny is going into his decline years with arm troubles. You cant be delusional enough to think a straight swap is fair.
The guy above said Penny + Bard... that would be more fair.
Posted by: Russell | June 16, 2009 at 09:31 AM
The LAST thing the Rangers need is another first basemen, but it would figure since they love to keep 5 deep at that position and catcher.
Posted by: kinsler5 | June 16, 2009 at 09:32 AM
I don't see Bard as part of a deal, Hardy isn't gonna warrant any Top prospects anymore. Not only is his average and production down but also his time under team control. A small market .500, like Minnesota has a playoff shot this year but really is building for the future. They prob. would have given up top talent if it was 2 or more full years of Hardy. But even if you believe that its just a slump i think most teams are gonna be leery of giving up anything more than a B- prospect or two.
Posted by: Steveo26 | June 16, 2009 at 09:35 AM
This is a Milwaukee team featuring Suppan, Looper, Parra, and Bush in their starting rotation. Penny and his sub 4 ERA since April in the AL East would instantly step in and be the #2 starter. He has gotten stronger with each outing and just shut down the #1 offensive team in the league and outdueled CC.
I, for one, hope they do not trade him for anything less than the king's ransom. They don't have to trade him. A team like the Brewers will not win in October with their current rotation.
Hardy is an excellent SS, but they have an even better one playing in AAA.
People on this board claiming Penny is washed up don't look at trends. They simply look at their current ERA or batting average(examples being Penny and Hardy here)...
Do some homework before writing up lame pretend conversations between GMs.
Posted by: carini26 | June 16, 2009 at 09:35 AM
"The guy above said Penny + Bard... that would be more fair."
That is a fair deal, but not sure that either GM would pull the trigger. Bard is the closer heir for Boston in another couple of years in Boston and Hardy is one of the best SS in the game. It would be gutsy for either team to make the call.
Posted by: johns | June 16, 2009 at 09:38 AM
The Sox want Hardy? They're trying to buy low again. That's what they do. Smoltz, Ortiz, Baldelli, Penny, Arroyo, Mueller...it's what the organization does. Penny's value isn't going to get much higher than it was after 6 shutout innings against the Yankees. I'm sure the offer was Penny and prospects for Hardy, but the Sox were trying to see if Milwaukee was giving up on Hardy with Escobar around.
I think a team like the Mets or Phillies would go after Penny, but I don't expect him to bring back much than a bench bat or some prospects who are a few years away.
Posted by: Gstill45 | June 16, 2009 at 09:38 AM
"they have an even better one in AAA".
I'm not sure about that. Hardy has more power now than Escobar maybe ever will. Escobar is said to be outstanding defensively, but I'm not sure if hit bat is quite there yet...though he is hitting well currently at Nashville.
Posted by: Invader3K | June 16, 2009 at 09:44 AM
@Kinsler: I get what your saying but why rush Smoak. Davis has been awful...the power is there but thats all. His OBP is around .200, Blaock's is under .300, that is not going to win them the West. Johnson's OPS would be 4th on the Rangers (and that's without hitting in Texas). The Rangers biggest weakness is getting on base and thats what Johnson does the best. Johnson has consistently been a league leader in OPS. He makes sense for them as a rental since they are in the playoff hunt this year.
I mean its not like Johnson would cost Holland or Feliz type of prospect.
Posted by: Steveo26 | June 16, 2009 at 09:48 AM
Invader3K -
Escobar is the best SS prospect in the minors and projects to be a Jose Reyes-type in the majors. He'll hit for average, a little pop, and steal 40+ bases. Needs to work on his BB rates to be an effective OBP leadoff guy, but he's a defensive wiz and should be a top 10 SS in the majors for a long time.
Posted by: carini26 | June 16, 2009 at 09:53 AM
Instead of a Penny for Hardy swap. It should be Bowden, Delcarmen, and Carter for Hardy and R.J. Swindle. Fair trade for both sides. Bowden can be a good #2 or #3 starter. Delcarmen a good set up guy for Hoff and eventually the closer. And Carter, with his hitting abilities, can be one of the best pinch hitters in the game. Mean while Swindle gives the Sox another LOOGY who can develop. And Hardy the shortstop they've always wanted.
Go Brewers and White Sox!
Posted by: soxfan4life | June 16, 2009 at 09:53 AM
Love how everyone takes a team that they DON'T like and make it out like they are trying to steal from everyone. Get over yourselves. Every team that has a moveable piece tries to sell high. It's not just the Sox with Penny, it's everyone. Pull your heads out of the hole and recognize.
Posted by: turnthe2 | June 16, 2009 at 10:06 AM
I think Kinsler is wrong and Stevo is right above. Unless Davis receives some kind of divine revelation and starts walking & making contact, he's headed to OKC as soon as they have someone to replace him. Smoak might be ready to go for the Rangers next spring, but then again he may not. Consider what guys like Weiters, Beckham, etc. are doing in their first shots at the bigs - sometimes it takes time.
So Johnson would be a great OBP guy who can hit some doubles to hit third for this team. If they could get him for say Arias & 1 of their A level Latin pitching prospects - that'd be a good deal. Johnson can always DH, too - and he'd be a decent DH. He may cost more than that, though - and there will be many teams bidding for his services. Seems like the story above indicates Texas isn't interested in him - but I wish they would reconsider. He'd help.
And the Blalock note is interesting too. God I hope Texas could get something better than Saito for Hank. Saito's okay - but man. Hank's value has really dropped, hasn't it? Saito is 39 years old.
Posted by: J the Dizzolla | June 16, 2009 at 10:07 AM
Blalock for Saito is a total rip off for Boston. Blalock walks after this year and is always hurt, Saito is an instant 8th inning/closer for most teams and you may want to check his stats.. The guy is back at full throttle and would be a closer right now on many teams. No way is Blalock even close to Saito.
Posted by: johns | June 16, 2009 at 10:31 AM
LOL @ Niceshot
Youre an idiot.
That's all
Posted by: xethicx | June 16, 2009 at 10:32 AM
I don't know if I'd say that Penny is "washed up" but he does have recurring control health issues, which tend to crop up late in the season. Here in LA we watched him lose command of his breaking pitches several times and start throwing almost nothing but fastballs, and become very hittable. It was nice to see Saito get (yet) another lease on his career in Boston, but I think everyone who knows his history knows that he's effectively always one pitch away from being done. For those reasons, limited trade value on both of them.
Posted by: BlueSky | June 16, 2009 at 10:41 AM
hey johns - no I agree that Saito is good. But how long will he be able to pitch at that level - he's 39.
You're probably right that Saito is more valuable right now. I would just like to see them get someone a little younger.
Posted by: J the Dizzolla | June 16, 2009 at 10:44 AM
"Instead of a Penny for Hardy swap. It should be Bowden, Delcarmen, and Carter for Hardy and R.J. Swindle. Fair trade for both sides. Bowden can be a good #2 or #3 starter. Delcarmen a good set up guy for Hoff and eventually the closer. And Carter, with his hitting abilities, can be one of the best pinch hitters in the game. Mean while Swindle gives the Sox another LOOGY who can develop. And Hardy the shortstop they've always wanted."
I think that's giving up too much from the Sox' end to work.
Yeah, Hardy's probably going to come out of this slump, but it's not guaranteed. He's got a history of back problems and I'm not sure I'd want to downgrade our bullpen for him right now while giving up a third starter type, especially with only a year left before Hardy's a free agent.
Both Lugo and Green are inexplicably hitting better than Hardy is right now, so trading for Hardy when he's not hitting would be pointless unless you're getting him below market value. Green's a crappy shortstop overall, but it's not nearly as glaring with Youkilis back in the lineup. When Bailey was in there, it was god awful and possible call for desperate measures, but Green's problem is he's got a terrible arm. Having Youk back out there with his excellent picking and extension saves Green on a lot of plays and balances out the infield defense. If Green can keep hitting above his own ability until Lowrie gets back, the shortstop situation becomes moot for now. I'd rather stand pat on it until the season ends.
As much as I'd honestly like Hardy playing in Fenway, the time for a deal like that has passed. Hardy's plate struggles have continued and Lowrie's very close to returning. From a Sox perspective, there's no real point in trading him unless he can be gotten on the cheap. I'd just as soon wait until he hits free agency, when Lugo and Lowell are both off the books and Anderson ready, so we could use Lowrie as a Crisp-like super utility guy, giving time off to Youkilis, Hardy and Pedroia when necessary.
Posted by: 0bsessions | June 16, 2009 at 10:53 AM
If Justin Smoak wasn't on the DL Nick Johnson wouldn't even be considered have you seen what Smoak is doing in just 150 ab's down at AA. .325 avg 6hr 25 rbi .444Obp...we got another Teixiera on our hands
Posted by: Rangerfan | June 16, 2009 at 11:03 AM
"You're probably right that Saito is more valuable right now. I would just like to see them get someone a little younger. "
I understand wanting to get a young/controllable setup/closer in the Ranger BP, but Blalock walks after this year and is always hurt, so why should Boston give the Rangers an 8th inning/closer who has been dominant in the 8th inning/closer role when Papelbon has been tired who has a club option for 2010? It is a poor deal for Boston, since they would be looking for someone that they could control also if they would be willing to dive up a dominant closer type reliever that if his injury history were to pop up later this year, well his option can be declined for next year anyway and a team that does need 8th inning/closer help like the Brewers, Texas would greatly benefit from him.
Posted by: johns | June 16, 2009 at 11:07 AM
"The guy above said Penny + Bard... that would be more fair."
Wha-What? How is this a "fair" trade? You want the Red Sox to give up a 6 inning each outing starter + a top closing prospect for a SS that might not even start when he gets to Fenway? Bard is going no where, he is Theo's leverage against Papelbon when he asks for $15 million/year.
As the season moves on Penny becomes even more valuable and with the Red Sox surplus of pitching they have all the strength to deal. Peavy is out, Oswalt is unavailable, so is Haladay. With Bedard being the only big arm on the market and his problems with big cities + what the Mariners are gonna ask, Penny's value will keep rising the closer we get to the deadline.
And stop with the Smoak for so-and-so on the Sox rumors, why would the Red Sox trade for a prospect who will compete with their #1 position prospect, who is rated higher?
Posted by: CircusFresh | June 16, 2009 at 11:25 AM
"Yeah, Hardy's probably going to come out of this slump, but it's not guaranteed."
The guy posted .786 and .821 OPS's in 2007 and 2008, and he's one of the better defensive shortstops in the game, something that few people seem to realize.
He has a career UZR/150 of +12.3 at shortstop, and this season he's up at +16.0 so far.
His .232 BABIP and 7.2% HR/FB are bound to increase substantially, as he's still hitting a similar amount of line drives and fly balls as last season.
Hardy is still one of the better shortstops in the game, and it would cost a haul to land him.
Bowden and Declarmen for Hardy seems like a pretty fair offer to me.
The guy posted WAR's of 4.5 and 4.9 in the past two seasons, so obviously he's pretty damn good.
Posted by: scribbletone | June 16, 2009 at 12:23 PM
Bowden and MDC for Hardy?
Wow, you guys have a much higher opinion of JJ Hardy than I.
I can guarantee that Theo will never make this deal, especially when Theo thought Bowden for N. Johnson was too much to give up.
MDC for Hardy, possibly, but again I am not convinced Hardy is enough of an upgrade to Lowrie.
Posted by: CircusFresh | June 16, 2009 at 12:34 PM
"MDC for Hardy, possibly, but again I am not convinced Hardy is enough of an upgrade to Lowrie."
Did you ignore all those statistics that I brought up?
Hardy is a fantastic defensive shortstop and his offensive struggles this season are based a good deal around bad luck, because he's making similar contact to what he's done in the past.
If you don't consider Hardy one of the better young shortstops in the game, then to be fair, but I think that you're wrong.
Then again, I'm also pretty fond of Lowrie because I think that he can be similar to Hardy but with more contact and less power, so yeah, if I was Theo I wouldn't give up Bowden and MDC for Hardy. But that's about what Hardy is worth.
Posted by: scribbletone | June 16, 2009 at 12:42 PM
What would the orioles have to give up for Hardy? I'd start the talks with Sheriill, but I'd be interested to hear what Brewes fans would realistically want.
Posted by: joemorgan=#1 | June 16, 2009 at 01:21 PM
"Bowden and Declarmen for Hardy seems like a pretty fair offer to me."
I don't necessarily disagree. It's a fair move, but probably not a wise one from the Sox perspective. If they made a move for Hardy, it would be a "in the now" thing. That said, there's no point in getting a guy who's hitting terribly when your defensively mediocre shortstop has one of the best defenders in the league across the diamond from him picking his garbage throws with efficiency. It would solve their defense problem, but it would hurt their bullpen and offense.
I can see the benefit of a guy like Hardy for the sake of the future, but he's only signed through next season, which makes giving up anything of value for him when adding him would in effect make the team worse in two areas while only improving in one that's not as bad lately seem pretty pointless.
I like Hardy, I like him a whole lot, but it would be more prudent of the Sox to hold on to their arms and see if he hits free agency (Which he almost certainly will with a potentially better short stop behind him).
Posted by: 0bsessions | June 16, 2009 at 02:06 PM
Some posters here think that delcarmen and bowden would be fair for hardy so for sherrill, add in baltimores top pitching prospect and maybe more to get the deal done.
Posted by: RED SOX DYNASTY! | June 16, 2009 at 02:36 PM
the o's top pitching prospect is chris tillman and he's not going anywhere..i say the o's should trade someone like guthrie for chris davis
Posted by: THEBIGFISH99 | June 16, 2009 at 04:14 PM
"I don't know why the Sox would be looking to trade Saito."
Because he's a breakdown candidate?
Posted by: BlueSky | June 16, 2009 at 04:23 PM
"I don't know why the Sox would be looking to trade Saito."
Because he's a breakdown candidate?
Posted by: BlueSky | June 16, 2009 at 04:23 PM"
True, but I would love too see him back in LA. I hated when LA let him go.. Whats he gonna make this year? 1.5 million with incentives? SO cheap.
Posted by: 661dodgerblue | June 16, 2009 at 04:35 PM
"Some posters here think that delcarmen and bowden would be fair for hardy so for sherrill, add in baltimores top pitching prospect and maybe more to get the deal done."
Bowden isn't under BA's Top 50. Tillman is (probably Top 20). Tillman throws harder with more stuff. Bowden's overall game is better. His command is outstanding. Tillman's needs work. Tillman is dominating with Ks at AAA at a year younger than Bowden. Sorry but no way. Tillman is the better prospect.
Anyways all of this talk is a moot point since they have Itzturis under contract ith an option for at least 1 more year after this. He's been an excellent glove, and good situational bat. His numbers are actually better than Hardy's.
Posted by: basemonkey | June 16, 2009 at 05:04 PM
I feel that if the Brewers trade JJ Hardy for a different short stop that the Brewers may not be in the running for the title. Being a Brewers fanI think that the Brewers should stay with the team as is and JJ Hardy stay as a Milwaukee Brewers.
Posted by: Brewersfan | July 19, 2009 at 10:39 PM