![]() |
|
|
| |
« Reds Seek Bats | Main | Estes Hopes To Play In Majors »
Joel Sherman of the New York Post tells us why the Yankees weren't serious about Mark DeRosa and adds a couple other rumors:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
Molina they may have to keep, a weak bat that plays solid defense, much like Dave Cash that cannot hold a job, or stay on a MLB roster for any period of time and imagine the Yankees really liking what they see in Cervelli, who has looked good in games I have seen, but carrying Cervelli, along with weak bat Molina and exact opposite weak fielding Posada seems like it could be tough to do, even the pitiful Nats gave up on carrying 3 catchers after only a couple of weeks into the season and the Mets didn't go long with it either. Yanks may want another guy who can play middle IF/3B perhaps?
Posted by: johns | June 29, 2009 at 09:31 AM
It costs the Yankees nothing and actually to cut Molina and keep Cervelli.
Posted by: dan l | June 29, 2009 at 09:40 AM
When Molina returns, Cervelli will just go down to AAA. He's a weak hitter who completely skipped AAA and only played 37 games in AA. He only played 27 total games last season and 38 this season. He'd benefit a lot from getting regular time in AAA.
Posted by: yanksfan | June 29, 2009 at 09:49 AM
I agree about Cervelli in AAA. It would keep him active and if we need him again, he's there.
Posted by: MattinglyFan | June 29, 2009 at 10:03 AM
No spot for DeRosa? Oh, I forgot that the Yankees have Cody Ransom off the bench...
DeRosa would have been nice as he could play virtually anywhere and would allow the Yanks to DFA rancid Ransom.
As for Cervelli, I've been very impressed with him. While his defense isn't on par with Molina, his bat is better. I think with time, he'll be better defensively than Jose as he's shown good skills so far.
Posted by: InvalidUserID | June 29, 2009 at 10:08 AM
The point isn't if the Yankees have a roster spot for DeRosa, it's if they have enough playing time to justify the cost in salary and players to acquire DeRosa. Ransom makes $450k, Ransom makes $5.5m and would have required giving up a prospect. That's a lot for someone who would only play about once a week.
Posted by: yanksfan | June 29, 2009 at 10:17 AM
^LOGIC for the win
Posted by: ArodMVP217 | June 29, 2009 at 10:32 AM
I think the DeRosa/Teahan question is more that he is an option for IF/OF in case ARod does go down, like Lowell "may" be depending on how he reacts to the lubricant injection he receives today. Yankees without ARod really cannot count on Ransom, or anyone else that they have to cover again if he misses an awful lot of time this late.
Posted by: johns | June 29, 2009 at 10:37 AM
Err, I think everyone realized what I meant, but my other post should've said DeRosa makes $5.5m, not Ransom.
Posted by: yanksfan | June 29, 2009 at 11:03 AM
"I think the DeRosa/Teahan question is more that he is an option for IF/OF in case ARod does go down, like Lowell "may" be depending on how he reacts to the lubricant injection he receives today."
Hehehe.
Ill bet that isnt the only lubricant injection that Lowell will receive this year.
Posted by: thenerbster | June 29, 2009 at 11:20 AM
"
The point isn't if the Yankees have a roster spot for DeRosa, it's if they have enough playing time to justify the cost in salary and players to acquire DeRosa. Ransom makes $450k, Ransom makes $5.5m and would have required giving up a prospect. That's a lot for someone who would only play about once a week."
Once a week?
On a team with aging veterans like Rodriguez, Jeter, Damon, Posada and Matsui?
DeRosa would've been able to jump around between second, third, right, left and maybe even first a little, and between those positions I'm guessing that he could have gotten pretty much the equivalent to everyday playing time.
And the contract is prorated, so DeRosa would really only cost like $2.9M for the rest of the year, and you would likely get draft picks after he walks to free agency.
DeRosa would've been a very solid addition to the Yankees given Rodriguez's struggles to come back from his hip injury and the sheer versatility that DeRosa offers.
Posted by: scribbletone | June 29, 2009 at 12:34 PM
Ask CC if he'd like Cervelli to be sent down!! Molina is a servicable replacement for Jorge, but I like Cervelli and the energy he brings...not to mention you get a look at your future...send Jose' packing!
Posted by: Rodzilla | June 29, 2009 at 01:50 PM
scribbs: DeRosa isn't really a pressing need for us right now. Of course that's being w/ the assumption that with days off Arod can play the entire month. The kids have done a good job filling in for Arod, Jeter and Damon. Add to the fact that the asking price would've been 2 minor league prospects (probably AA/AAA pitchers) then I'm not so keen on DeRosa. It would've been a great luxury to have but I really don't see him playing more than 3 games a week spelling Arod, Jeter and Damon once a week. Pena certainly doesn't have the bat of a DeRosa but I think he's better at SS and 3b.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | June 29, 2009 at 03:53 PM
I agree DeRosa would've cost too much and it wasn't a real pressing need.
I like Cervelli a lot, I would like for him to have the backup job next season when Molina's contract is up, if his bat improves a little in AAA he could spell Posada from catching for maybe 65 games? Is that too often to have Cervelli in the 9 spot.
And I have another thing that is off topic and was wondering what people thought. For the Yankees OF next year what if they could bring Damon back on a 1-year plus a mutual option totalling 17-20MM. That way they could see if the Rays extend Crawford, because his option is going to be picked up. So worse case is Crawford doesn't hit FA and then the Yankees have the option of Damon on a possibly relatively good deal or they could go with other FA options.
Posted by: Yanksallday | June 30, 2009 at 03:05 AM
Meant to add it's because I think Holliday will cost too much with Boras as his agent and I don't want to see the Yankees lock up LF for 5-7 years.
Posted by: Yanksallday | June 30, 2009 at 03:07 AM
HOW ABOUT MIGUEL OLIVO 23 HR WITH GOOD D.
Posted by: DAVID RIVERA 51 | November 13, 2009 at 11:34 AM