![]() |
|
|
| |
« Mets Release Ken Takahashi | Main | MLBTR Chat Transcript »
Aubrey Huff wasn't great in 2006 (.267/.344/.469), but he still found a three-year, $21MM offer from the Orioles that winter. Surprisingly, Huff cranked out a .304/.360/.552 performance in 2008, ranking fifth in the AL in slugging. Huff was mainly a DH at that point, perhaps one reason why he cleared waivers.
Huff wasn't nearly as successful this year; he hit .241/.310/.384 in 597 plate appearances for the Orioles and Tigers. He was especially awful after the August 17th trade to Detroit.
Huff turns 33 in December, and his stock is down as he enters free agency. He logged 826 innings at first base this year, so we can't rule out an NL job. But does any team envision Huff as a regular player? Can he expect more than $2-3MM?
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
If the Cubs will give Aaron Miles a 2 year 4 mill contract, I'm guessing they'll snag up Huff to keep him company.
Posted by: RoyHobbs | October 20, 2009 at 01:38 PM
Could Huffy be a plan b option for the braves for a 1B/3B if Laroche can't be resigned at reasonable cost? Is it worth the shot at 2-3M in the hopes that he will rebound to his 08' numbers? I still Laroche should be the main target at 1B but you could get something similar in numbers with Huffy at 1/2 the cost it will take resign Laroche.
Posted by: BravoFan3736 | October 20, 2009 at 01:43 PM
Huff should get a spring invite if he is lucky. He couldnt even make the teams of half of mlb. I see him getting signed by a winning team to sit in triple A and wait there if he is needed. He wont get more then 3 million in any case
Posted by: 04Forever | October 20, 2009 at 01:45 PM
Mets should consider him. They need a stopgap at 1B while still working on Murphy and Davis. He can come cheap, and with Abreu on a 2/20 with a 3rd year team option in Left, we can spend the rest of our resources on Pitching
Posted by: Jeff | October 20, 2009 at 01:46 PM
I wouldn't be surprised if he's a late February signing. The Mariners might be a good fit if Griffey and/or Branyan retire and sign elsewhere, respectively.
Posted by: not sure | October 20, 2009 at 01:46 PM
I wouldn't be surprised if he's a late February signing. The Mariners might be a good fit if Griffey and/or Branyan retire and sign elsewhere, respectively.
Posted by: not sure | October 20, 2009 at 01:46 PM
Where are all the Huff apologists? The guys that kept pointing out that he is a notoriously slow starter. Oops. Turned out he just wasn't good - at the start or end of the season.
I actually think Huff would be a great companion signing to whomever goes after Nick Johnson. They can split time, with Johnson getting the bulk of the AB's. If (when) he gets injured or needs a break Huff should be ready to step in and provide decent production.
Anything above a 1/$2m contract would be too much though.
Posted by: bjsguess | October 20, 2009 at 01:59 PM
Probably snag a decent (but not extravagant) deal somewhere (pretty much anywhere), he's had some cracking years (2002-2004, 2008). He's proved that he isn't a bad player just a remarkably inconsistent one, i wouldn't be surprised if he hit .300 with 25+ HRs. Problem is i wouldn't be surprised if he it .260 with 5+ HRs.
Posted by: Aranathor | October 20, 2009 at 02:02 PM
"Anything above a 1/$2m contract would be too much though."
Yeah, a below-average defender coming off that kind of performance in this market shouldn't get more
than 1/2 or so, although he could make for a decent platoon addition.
He's certainly not much of an impact bat anymore though.
Posted by: scribbletone | October 20, 2009 at 02:09 PM
If he is only going to get that kind of offer from teams, wouldn't the pirates be interested in him? He is a lefty, the pirates covet lefties, and could play 1st until alvarez or tabata is ready to play everyday at the major league level. He could also serve as a valuable pinch hitter when he didn't get to start but he would provide some pop, provided his power returns, and would be much less apt to tank on a non contender. If they offered him a one year deal, he tears it up in the weak pitching of NL for the first half they could dump him for prospects and bring up clement after the deadline. Anyone see this happening? Its not a jeromy burnitz situation as long as they dont give him big money
Posted by: Still holding out hope in da burgh | October 20, 2009 at 02:17 PM
Why did Huff decline so much in '09? Age, injury, mechanics? It appears that 2008 was the fluke but is there a chance he could repeat or is 2009 his new base level? I guess that's what needs to be figured out before it's decided how much he's worth.
Posted by: pageian | October 20, 2009 at 02:32 PM
"Why did Huff decline so much in '09? Age, injury, mechanics? It appears that 2008 was the fluke but is there a chance he could repeat or is 2009 his new base level? I guess that's what needs to be figured out before it's decided how much he's worth."
His line drive rate, HR/FB ratio, and contact rates plummeted, and his power seemingly disappeared.
Although I do like the Pirates suggestion.
He could share playing time at third base with Vazquez, first base with Jones, and left field with Moss and/or Pearce until Alvarez and/or Tabata are ready, and give the team a veteran presence in their order, which lacks power beyond Jones, Doumit, and the decent power from McCutchen, LaRoche and Milledge.
Posted by: scribbletone | October 20, 2009 at 02:49 PM
If he is going to play for peanuts, he surely won't be signing with Pittsburgh.
I could see him signing for cheap, but there will be jobs in ATL, NYM, SF, and the Yankees and Red Sox are always options for "cheap" guys.
Posted by: skinnyjh | October 20, 2009 at 02:56 PM
1 year/3 million to the Giants. I think he's a good buy low candidate. He's had terrible years, and great years. He should be able to bounce back. At least, I think so. Anyone think he could be similar to Abreu this season?
Posted by: worldchamps08 | October 20, 2009 at 03:02 PM
Pittsburgh gives him the opportunity to show he can still play everyday and will be forthright with saying if he gains any value that he will be dealt to a contender at the deadline. I can see him being a strong advocate of the situation and it gives him the opportunity to do so in a weak pitching division outside of st. louis.
Posted by: Still holding out hope in da burgh | October 20, 2009 at 03:02 PM
"If he is going to play for peanuts, he surely won't be signing with Pittsburgh.
I could see him signing for cheap, but there will be jobs in ATL, NYM, SF, and the Yankees and Red Sox are always options for "cheap" guys."
That depends on whether he wants to be a bench piece for a contender or practically an everyday player for a lesser team.
With the playing time, he can show other teams that he's still a playable everyday piece, and maybe make himself some cash while extending his career.
"Anyone think he could be similar to Abreu this season?"
They're very different players, so no.
Posted by: scribbletone | October 20, 2009 at 03:20 PM
Agreed - Huff doesn't have nearly the history (both career and recent) that Abreu had. He could certainly bounce back to 08 levels - I just wouldn't bet on it.
Posted by: bjsguess | October 20, 2009 at 04:02 PM
sounds like A billy beane pick up
Posted by: OaklandAs | October 20, 2009 at 04:12 PM
I agree with OaklandAs. I think he would be a nice fit in Oakland. What do they have to lose? Their other options are Barton and potentially Garciaparra (if he is still around).
Posted by: CardinalsFan06 | October 20, 2009 at 04:32 PM
"I agree with OaklandAs. I think he would be a nice fit in Oakland. What do they have to lose? Their other options are Barton and potentially Garciaparra (if he is still around)."
You want the A's to bench Daric Barton in order to sign Aubrey Huff? Really?
Barton has showed some great plate discipline in AAA and with Oakland this year, he's a plus defender at first, and he's got solid gap power, although he'll never be more than a 20-25 HR hitter.
Even so, his ability to get on-base, his quality defense, his youth, and his upside make him a substantially superior option than Huff.
The Athletics need to focus on adding a third baseman so that they don't rush Brett Wallace to the majors, as well as adding a good innings eater so they don't overuse any of their talented young arms, especially Anderson and Cahill.
Posted by: scribbletone | October 20, 2009 at 05:37 PM
I think Huff could get a look as a platoon 1B who could provide cover at 3B or OF in a pinch. He had a pretty solid first three months, then was absolutely terrible from July on. Keep in mind that in July, while Huff was batting 4th, the #5 hitter was the atrocious Melvin Mora and the #6 hitter (Luke Scott) hit a poor 213. Not sure what happened to him in Detroit other than (1) he didn't get regular playing time and (2) it's more of a pitchers park than Camden Yards.
It's not unreasonable to think that he could repeat his first half numbers, which would have put him on pace for .270 and 20 hrs. You could do worse.
Posted by: mstrchef13 | October 20, 2009 at 08:30 PM
"Anyone think he could be similar to Abreu this season?"
They're very different players, so no.
You missed my point. What I meant was that he could sign very cheaply and put up great numbers for the price. I'm not stupid.
Posted by: worldchamps08 | October 20, 2009 at 10:00 PM
"sounds like A billy beane pick up"
Sounds more like a KW pick up. I hope he steers away from Huff but KW's moves always seem to work out.
Posted by: g13 | October 20, 2009 at 10:26 PM
""I agree with OaklandAs. I think he would be a nice fit in Oakland. What do they have to lose? Their other options are Barton and potentially Garciaparra (if he is still around).""
No, doesn't look like one to me.
Unless Cust is non-tendered, Huff shouldn't be considered. No reason to block someone by playing him at 1B.
Posted by: melonis rex | October 21, 2009 at 01:58 AM