![]() |
|
|
| |
« Jed Hoyer Notes | Main | Astros Hire Brad Mills As Manager »
Next up in our Offseason Outlook series, the Tigers. Their likely commitments for 2010:
C - Gerald Laird - $2.8MM+
C - Alex Avila - $400K
1B - Miguel Cabrera - $20MM
2B - Scott Sizemore - $400K
SS - Ramon Santiago - $825K+
3B - Brandon Inge - $6.6MM
IF - Brent Dlugach - $400K
LF - Carlos Guillen - $13MM
CF - Curtis Granderson - $5.5MM
RF - Magglio Ordonez - $18MM
OF - Ryan Raburn - $410K
OF - Clete Thomas - $403K
DH - Marcus Thames - $2.275MM+
SP - Justin Verlander - $3.675MM+
SP - Edwin Jackson - $2.2MM+
SP - Rick Porcello - $1.025MM
SP - Nate Robertson - $10MM
SP - Jeremy Bonderman - $12.5MM
Other candidates: Dontrelle Willis - $12MM, Armando Galarraga - $435K
RP - Joel Zumaya - $735K+
RP - Ryan Perry - $400K
RP - Bobby Seay - $1.3MM+
RP - Zach Miner - $438K+
RP - Armando Galarraga - $435K
RP - Fu-Te Ni - $400K
RP - Freddy Dolsi - $407K
Non-tender candidates: Marcus Thames, Matt Treanor
The Tigers have about $116.5MM committed before arbitration raises to Laird, Santiago, Thames, Verlander, Jackson, Zumaya, Seay, Miner, and Treanor. Thames and Treanor could be non-tendered, but the raises should easily exceed $10MM. The Tigers could be approaching $130MM committed after entering 2009 at $115MM (according to Cot's Baseball Contracts).
Given the payroll limitations and his recent history, GM Dave Dombrowski does not figure to be heavily involved with free agents. Last year he went the trade route to acquire Jackson, Laird, and Josh Anderson and signed free agents Adam Everett, Brandon Lyon, Treanor, and Ni for a total of $6.5MM.
With 2009 starters Placido Polanco and Everett eligible for free agency, the Tigers' middle infield is up in the air. Sizemore is still the favorite to take over at second base despite suffering a broken ankle in the Arizona Fall League. Sizemore, 25 in January, hit .308/.378/.473 in 330 Triple A plate appearances this year. Assuming manager Jim Leyland still views Santiago as a backup player, perhaps the Tigers will re-sign Everett or add a similar affordable free agent. Internally, Dlugach merits a look.
Raburn profiles as one of the game's better fourth outfielders, so the Tigers are protected if Guillen is injured or ineffective. Despite the current plan to use Guillen as the everyday left fielder, it may make sense to non-tender Thames and let Guillen DH. The Tigers' middling offense of 2009 will need to improve mainly from within, with Granderson and Guillen capable of better seasons.
The excellent front three are set in the rotation, and the final two spots may be snagged by pricey veterans in their contract years: Robertson, Bonderman, and Willis. Bonderman, just 26, seems healthy and is being penciled in by Leyland. The Tigers have been linked to free agent Aroldis Chapman, an investment that could conceivably be part of the scouting budget. Whether Chapman could contribute in 2010 is unknown.
The Tigers face two possible late-inning losses in the bullpen in Fernando Rodney and Lyon. If Rodney feels that his 37 saves should lead to a $6MM+ salary, he should be allowed to leave. Likewise, Lyon may want a raise after posting a 2.86 ERA in 78.6 innings. Zumaya and Perry could seize the opportunity, if they keep the walks down.
The Tigers continue to be hamstrung by lousy contract extensions, but they have enough talent to compete in 2010. Bonderman, Willis, Robertson, Inge, Laird, and possibly Ordonez could be off the books after '10, so Dombrowski will gain a lot of flexibility at that point.
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
Unless Guillen and Ordonez have circa 2006 seasons, this team will just be middle of the pack. The outfield is too old and unproductive. The infield plays defense but doesnt hit (except MCab). Rotation should be great 1-3 and could be quite good 1-6. But you still can't win with an offense of M-Cab and defensive specialists/worndowns.
The Tigers will be in great position in 2011 to make some serious moves with all of that cash coming off the books. Next years free agent class is pretty nice and they could make some major splashes.
Posted by: Pat Metzger | October 27, 2009 at 12:19 PM
The tigers 1-3 SP are rediculously cheap, meanwhile their 4 and 5 are off the charts for extremely average pitchers. It doesn't make sense. Verlander deserves more money.
Posted by: Rootdown | October 27, 2009 at 12:29 PM
Good thing they play in the worst division in baseball, it's the only way Dombrowski looks even halfway passable as a GM at this point.
Posted by: not sure | October 27, 2009 at 12:44 PM
"Verlander deserves more money."
And he's about to get it. I wouldn't be shocked to see him submit a $10M salary during arbitration. Tigers might want to bite the bullet and sign Verlander to a massive extension. If they work it out right they could sort of backload his contract so they won't feel the financial pinch this year.
Posted by: start_wearing_purple | October 27, 2009 at 12:47 PM
In Dombrowski's defense most of those contracts looked good at the time (other than Willis)
Posted by: Sparticus | October 27, 2009 at 01:08 PM
LINEUP: Adding Everett, Inge, and Laird to the lineup in '09 blew three massive holes into the offense, and the team ranked 10th in run production. There IS such a thing as a complete ballplayer. Laird is fine. Inge and Everett are not. Trade Inge for a bag of stale chips, let Everett walk, trade or non tender Thames, and sign Chone Figgins.
You CAN'T let Polanco walk for nothing and then tell us you're all about defense. They need to offer arbitration to Polanco, and if another club offers him a sweet multi year deal AND gives up a first round pick to Detroit, that's fine. But if Dombrowski loses Rodney, Lyon, and Polanco and claims it's due to finances, after letting Ordonez's 18 million option vest, then he needs to be fired.
$ 72 million for Willis, Bonderman, Robertson, Ordonez, Guillen, and Inge- and for WHAT production? Nada. Suck it up for a year until the bad contracts come off the books, and there is relief in 2010. Not that DD will spend it, since NO AL team has signed fewer free agents or spent less on them in the past 3 years than Detroit.
BULLPEN: The Tiger pen ranked 10th in save pct, 10th in bullpen ERA, 12th in WHIP, led the league in Walks, and was dead last in K/ BB. Considering that they were 72- 0 when leading after the 8th inning, the rest of the pen looks like a horror flick, and they have a manager that plays a daily game of bullpen roulette. Take away Rodney and Lyon, and where are you? They need help, but Dombrowski has failed to help the bullpen year after year after year.
Same old story- NRI's, same retreads, and failed starters in the bullpen, and Zumaya the freak show blowing games before he hits the DL. What's the bullpen plan for 2010- count on Zumaya again? More NRI's? A Rule 5 pick? Who will be this year's Jose Mesa, Juan Rincon, Matt Mantei, Scott Williamson, or Joey Eischen? How about another Yorman Bazardo, Eduardo Campusano, Francisco Cruceta, or Kyle Bloom?
- Give Polanco a one year deal
- Offer arbitration to Polanco, Lyon, and Rodney
- Trade as many of Inge, Ordonez, Guillen, Robertson, Bonderman, and Willis as you can- for nothing (and good luck with that one)
- Sign Chone Figgins and Marco Scutaro
- Trade for JJ Hardy (if not Marco)
- Let Huff, Everett, and Washburn walk
- Trade or Non Tender Thames
And fer cryin out loud, DO NOT let Ordonez get another 135 starts to let that 2011 option vest at 15 million!
Posted by: Tigerdog | October 27, 2009 at 01:13 PM
Almost $35 mil tied up in Willis, Bonderman, & Nate Robertson. Brutal. Just brutal. There's going to be a bidding war for Chapman, so I don't see the Tigers riding that out. Sorry, but the Tigers are not looking very set for 2010, even in a weak division.
Posted by: drphonic7 | October 27, 2009 at 01:16 PM
Yeah, that's just what the Tigers need. Two 50-60 million dollar contracts for Figgins and Scoot, who are both coming off career (contract) years. Of those that you nominated, the only one possibly getting traded is Inge, maybe Ordonez at the deadline if he doesn't project to hit his vesting PA number. The others you don't get rid of unless you want Vernon Wells on your team.
Posted by: not sure | October 27, 2009 at 01:17 PM
An interesting proposal could be trying to trade Ordonez to the Yankees who could move Swisher to LF if the Tigers are willing to eat half of the 18 million owed this year. Yay? Nay?
Posted by: TwinRoyals | October 27, 2009 at 01:31 PM
something that could possibly make sense is to work out a 3 team deal with the rays and cubs. the rays were said to be interested in milton bradley before so it could go like this:
Rays get Milton Bradley
Cubs get Jeremy Bonderman or Nate Robertson
Tigers get Carl Crawford
Posted by: Slick | October 27, 2009 at 01:50 PM
Slick, let me get this right. You want the Tigers to give up one of 2 possible ineffective pitchers and get a damn good player in return. You also want the Rays to give up a damn good player and get a headache in return.
Normally I'd just ask if you were dropped on your head as a child or recently had a lobotomy, but I'm in a slightly good mood today and I'm going to ask you if either you forgot to add prospects or were trying to make a funny.
Posted by: start_wearing_purple | October 27, 2009 at 01:55 PM
Good one Slick.
If you're the Rays, do you honestly think you'd even consider for 3 seconds moving one of the top defensive corner OF in the game who is coming off a career year at the plate for a club cancer who is a horrible defender and is essentially a one dimensional player and is more expensive?
If you mean Carl Crawford (read: Pat Burrell) Then yes, I could see that at least being considered.
Posted by: not sure | October 27, 2009 at 01:56 PM
yeah i forgot to add that there should be additional prospects in that deal i just couldnt think of who would be good for this deal. but, every team would be getting about the same amount in return contract wise
Posted by: Slick | October 27, 2009 at 01:59 PM
Thanks Slick, you temporarily restored my faith in humanity.
Posted by: start_wearing_purple | October 27, 2009 at 02:12 PM
Here's one of my favorite statistics from 2009:
Ordonez: 2.1 WAR, $18M
Bonderman: -0.3 WAR, $12.5M
Guillen: 0.1 WAR, $13M
Willis: -0.1 WAR, $12M
Robertson: 0.5 WAR $10M
The Tigers owe these five players a combined $65.5M for the 2010 season. In 2009, they posted a total WAR of 2.3, which is worth about $9.97M in total value.
AND NONE OF THEM ARE FREE AGENT CONTRACTS.
That's $65.5M for five players that were valued at a total of $9.97M in 2009. Think about how bad at offering contract extensions you have to be to make that many mistakes.
Damn.
Posted by: scribbletone | October 27, 2009 at 02:20 PM
First off, the Rays would never take on Bradley's salary or his attitude. Second, I think the Rays are pretty well stocked with prospects so bringing in Bradley + prospects over Crawford just doesn't make much sense at all.
Posted by: TwinRoyals | October 27, 2009 at 02:21 PM
Nice synopsis Tim.
The Tigers have that Polanco decision coming up - whether to offer him arbitration or not. I sort of assume they will, and then I sort of assume he'll take it and make $8-$10 million next year, but I haven't researched it. Anyone else have thoughts on that?
Posted by: Twins Geek | October 27, 2009 at 02:26 PM
There seems to be little chance Polanco is offered arbitration barring a significant bump in payroll, and while I don't follow the Tigers that closely, that doesn't seem to be an option. It's the perfect time to break in a guy like Scott Sizemore.
Posted by: vtadave | October 27, 2009 at 02:42 PM
ok, someone tell me if this sounds crazy.
trade robertson and either ramirez, wells, or boesch to the dodgers for furcal. the dodgers have chan hu waiting to play short, and they'll be looking for an outfielder to replace manny soon. plus, they need starting pitching depth; robertson had a strong september and, with the exception of the last two, has some good years under his belt. might benefit from a jump to the NL, too. tigers would get a gold glove, switch-hitting shortstop who could bat leadoff and bump granderson down in the order. more speed on the bases, too.
sign coco crisp to play LF. can't imagine he'll demand too much, and you might be able to get him at a one or two year deal. he gives you better defense in left, and again more speed on the bases.
make guillen DH or possibly play him at 3rd (i know, but its better than left), considering inge had surgery on both knees.
if casey crosby is ready, or if galarraga is good to go (or if by some miracle of god, dontrelle willis turns back the clock to 2005 - or hell, anywhere close), think about putting bonderman in the bullpen, maybe even at closer. he's only ever had two pitches anyway, and they're both dynamite - especially the slider. this move could possibly save you from having to sign rodney.
as for polanco, i'd like him back, but he'll probably be too much. the only way i see them signing him is if they think this sizemore injury could turn into something worse. cause lets face it, they always say they'll be ready by spring training no matter what the problem is.
all of this, combined with a better year from maggs and a refocused (again, god willing) cabrera and we might be able to make some noise next year.
Posted by: phil | October 27, 2009 at 03:54 PM
$12mm to Robertson...wow. How does a contract like that even happen?
Posted by: wesmantooth87 | October 27, 2009 at 03:54 PM
Sorry I rather keep a oft injured SS than oft injured SP who isn't all that special. Furcal is still a decent player, but should be allowed to lead off.
Posted by: 661dodgerblue | October 27, 2009 at 03:57 PM
but should be allowed to lead off.
but shouldn't be allowed to lead off.* NEVER EVER
Posted by: 661dodgerblue | October 27, 2009 at 04:05 PM
i understand why you'd wanna keep furcal, but robertson actually hasn't been injured that much. from 2004 to 2008, he made at least 30 starts and pitched an average of 189 innings per season. its just that in 2008, he suddenly forgot how to pitch; but he bounced back during his starts in 2009. this year was the first year he spent time on the DL in six seasons. if the tigers had scored more runs for him in those earlier seasons, he'd look like a much better pitcher. but again, i'd rather have furcal too. the tigers need more than just all or nothing right handed hitters that can't run in their lineup.
Posted by: phil | October 27, 2009 at 04:16 PM
Figgins won't get a $ 50 million contract, much less $ 60 million, and Scutaro won't get even half of that.
Try 3 yrs/ 30 mil for Figgins, and 2 yrs, 15 mil for Scutaro. Marco may be bitten by the "Orlando syndrome" as a Type A free agent, so he may hang around on the market for a while with not many takers because of the compensation. The Tigers may part with their first round pick IF they got a couple compensation picks for Polanco.
Polanco should get 6 to 7 mil if he goes to arbitration, or accepts arby and settles. He has 11 years under his belt, but he has little pop and second basemen make less than any other position player.
Robertson will get 10 mil in 2010, not 12 mil. He'd get a 1 mil bonus if he threw 200 innings in 2009. Didn't happen. Nate might do well in the NL.
Posted by: Tigerdog | October 27, 2009 at 04:31 PM
Figgins and Scutaro? Not going to happen.
Figgins will be WAY too expensive. He will get 45-50M.
Scutaro? Are you serious? A career journeyman that has had one good season. He turns 34 in another couple of days.
Marco will likely be in the $20M range. Yuck.
Tigerdog, this isn't your fantasy baseball team.
Your moves would put the Tigers up in the $150-160M range. That isn't going to happen.
Posted by: action000 | October 27, 2009 at 05:57 PM
I would be shocked if the Tigers don't offer Polanco arb, and equally shocked if he takes it.
At his age, he should be looking for that last big contract. He'll be looking to lock in a 3-4 year deal.
Posted by: action000 | October 27, 2009 at 06:00 PM
Figgins could only happen if they could unload Inge and his 6.6 mil, which is problematic because he's having surgery next week on both knees.
Figgins wants 4 yrs, 40 mil, but more likely will get 30 mil. We'll see.
Scutaro could only happen if Polanco were to decline arbitration, and then I'd go two years with him. Yeah, he's coming off a career year, but he's the only player in the league with a better contact rate than Polanco, he can get on base, has some speed, and can play shortstop. There aren't many SS options out there, but please tell me that Adam freaking Everett won't be back in the lineup!
Chances of either move are very remote. NO AL club has signed fewer free agents, or spent less money on free agents in the past three seasons than the Tigers. Not one multi year contract to a free agent in three seasons. I don't even trust DD to spend much of the bad contract money coming off the books in 2011. He still thinks Cale Iorg is a future all star. I think he's the next Adam Everett. Yikes!
Posted by: Tigerdog | October 27, 2009 at 06:09 PM
scutaro is a type A.. can't imagine losing #17 overral for him
Posted by: wolverine119 | October 27, 2009 at 06:52 PM
quick question for tiger fans, what do you think the chances are for trading granderson to relieve future payroll? what might be his value to other teams?
Posted by: agonzo23 | October 27, 2009 at 07:55 PM
quick question for tiger fans, what do you think the chances are for trading granderson to relieve future payroll? what might be his value to other teams?
Posted by: agonzo23 | October 27, 2009 at 07:55 PM
slim to none. we have a lot of money coming off the books at the end of next season
Posted by: allstarlineup | October 27, 2009 at 08:16 PM
Fire Dave Dombrowski.
Posted by: Will Smiff | October 27, 2009 at 10:30 PM
The last thing in the Tigers front office minds should be making a bid on any free agent, including the Cuban wonder child.
Priority one should be locking up Justin Verlander. After that the Tigers almost have to offer Polanco arbitration. How else do you approach such a pour lineup as the Tigers have? There isn't much cash to improve the lineup this year because of all those really nice looking contracts DD has been handing out.
If Polanco is allowed to walk straight up, take a look at least years starters and their numbers. Excluding Miguel's numbers what do the Tigers have? Ordonez's average was nice, but he offers no power, he's solid to GIDP, and has a 100+ RBI contract. Raburn's numbers are good, but he averaged 2.3 at bats a game in only 113 games played. Everyone else you just grimace a little thinking about it...
Offer Polanco arbitration, if he signs with another team great, if not we end up paying him 8-10 million for a year. Bringing Lyon back to close would be a luxury. But it's not a necessary move. If he wants a large pay raise, let him move on and plug in internally.
I'm content with waiting a year to have Willis, Robertson, etc. off the books and moving forward from there. Any serious moves this year will only move the Tigers further back.
Posted by: Cronus | October 28, 2009 at 02:16 PM
I really think what the Tigers do this off-season is to pick up Dave Duncan and Rudy Jaramillo as their Pitching Coach and their Hitting Coach. With all of the Kids ready to come up they really need both of them.
I know it would take a lot to get Dave Duncan here, but.....Promise him he'll be the next Manager of the Tigers, anything to get him here. With the ability of both of them Coaches the Team will be better off.
What do you Guy's think??
Thanks, Rick
Posted by: ATHFBL~Rick | October 29, 2009 at 02:51 AM
"With all of the Kids ready to come up they really need both of them. "
Huh? They don't have many (if any) kids ready to come up. Avila is the only one and he is already up.
Posted by: action000 | October 29, 2009 at 07:01 PM
Listen, I love Polanco and all he's done for us over the years but haven't we learned anything about contract extensions for these older veterans? It's high time we cut bait and get younger. Sorry it has to start with Polly but good or bad we have to run with Sizemore at 2B.
Posted by: hooligan | November 04, 2009 at 10:19 AM