![]() |
|
|
| |
« Astros Hire Brad Mills As Manager | Main | MLBTR Chat Transcript »
The Rays re-signed outfielder Gabe Kapler to a one-year, $1.05MM deal, according to Marc Topkin of the St. Petersburg Times. Kapler, 34, hit .239/.329/.439 in 238 plate appearances while playing all three outfield positions (primarily right field).
Kapler originally signed with the Rays for $1MM back in January. The Rays seemingly got their money's worth, as Kapler's strong defense led FanGraphs to value him at $5.2MM this year.
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
I don't think that FanGraphs is very accurate if Gabe "I should retire" Kapler is valued at 5 million.
Hell, I make 40K a year where is FanGraphs for my job maybe I can get a 400K raise?
Posted by: Hellion | October 27, 2009 at 01:33 PM
Fangraphs needs some serious work on their valuations.
Posted by: Kinsm | October 27, 2009 at 01:41 PM
I know this site is just a joke to you Hellion, but you really should try harder at your humor.
Good deal for the Rays on this one. Kapler plays excelent RF and can play CF and LF if needed and hammers LHP to the tune of .276/.379/.552/.931.
Seems like the perfect fouth/platoon veteran outfielder for 1M to me.
Posted by: bbxxj | October 27, 2009 at 01:43 PM
The Rays should of just used Kapler in a DH platoon split.
Posted by: 661dodgerblue | October 27, 2009 at 01:45 PM
I hate Fangraphs' system for evaluating players. There's no way anyone would pay Kapler over $5 million in 2009 or 2010, so how can it really be accurate? Maybe if they said "5.2 million fantasy player points" or something, I wouldn't mind.
That said, Kapler is a good guy to have around decent defense and decent pop in his bat. Not a bad deal for around a million.
Posted by: Invader3K | October 27, 2009 at 01:53 PM
Another laughable valuation from Fangraphs.
Posted by: Little Bear | October 27, 2009 at 01:53 PM
Trade proposal I thought of, let me see if you Rays fans like it or not.
Rays get:
RP Jokahim Soria
RF Mark Teahan
Royals get:
C Dioner Navarro (assuming you tender him)
SS Reid Brignac
RP Calvin Medlock
RP Thomas Rafferty
Posted by: TwinRoyals | October 27, 2009 at 02:04 PM
Trade proposal I thought of, let me see if you Rays fans like it or not.
Rays get:
RP Jokahim Soria
RF Mark Teahan
Royals get:
C Dioner Navarro (assuming you tender him)
SS Reid Brignac
RP Calvin Medlock
RP Thomas Rafferty"
That has Moore's name all over it, terrible for the Royals.
Posted by: 661dodgerblue | October 27, 2009 at 02:08 PM
"Fangraphs needs some serious work on their valuations."
Actually, you need some serious work on your understanding on FanGraph's valuations.
Kapler was worth 1.2 WAR in 2009, each win above replacement level is worth about $4.33M, so Kapler's value for the 2009 season came out to about $5.2M.
Just because he was worth $5.2M in 2009 doesn't mean that he'll be worth that amount in the future, and it doesn't mean that he actual talent level is that of a $5.2M player.
What it means is that his performance in 2009, regardless of how lucky he was, was worth X amount.
It offers little predictive value of what he'll be worth in the future, and the numbers can't really be applied to determining how much money a player should make in the future.
BUT, when talking solely about how valuable a player was during a previous period of time, purely during that time period, then the FanGraphs valuations are absolutely legitimate.
"Rays get:
RP Jokahim Soria
RF Mark Teahan
Royals get:
C Dioner Navarro (assuming you tender him)
SS Reid Brignac
RP Calvin Medlock
RP Thomas Rafferty"
Honestly, the Royals should be able to do better than Brignac, Navarro and some young relievers if they're dealing Soria AND Teahen.
Posted by: scribbletone | October 27, 2009 at 02:10 PM
TwinRoyals, I think the Royals would like a pitching prospect in return. Besides Betancourt is unfortunately entrenched at short (stupid Moore). Does anyone think the Rays would give up Davis or Hellickson?
Posted by: start_wearing_purple | October 27, 2009 at 02:17 PM
Well, I deflated the asking price a bit since I figured that the Rays would not be willing to take on too much more payroll with Soria and Teahan's salary expected to be between 7-8 million dollars.
Well then would the Rays organization go for Navarro, Brignac, Hellickson and a low A ball prospect then or is Hellickson untouchable?
Posted by: TwinRoyals | October 27, 2009 at 02:18 PM
I don't see the Rays dealing Hellickson or Davis for a closer, or well, for anyone actually. If they deal a starter, it's going to be someone like a James Shields, though even Shields is still cheap.
Posted by: vtadave | October 27, 2009 at 02:34 PM
"Besides Betancourt is unfortunately entrenched at short (stupid Moore)."
Certainly a dumb move, but at least Moore could help it by accepting Betancourt as a sunk cost, eating his money, and not wasting SS playing time on him. I know that DM won't do it, but that would be the best solution.
"Well then would the Rays organization go for Navarro, Brignac, Hellickson and a low A ball prospect then or is Hellickson untouchable?"
I would be surprised if Hellickson was available, but the Royals could certainly turn to Matt Moore or Nick Barnese as an excellent alternative, both of those guys will be shooting up the prospect charts soon.
If Moore could deal Soria for a package based around Brignac and Moore/Barnese, then that would be one helluva deal for Moore.
Unfortunately, Dayton Moore is the worst GM in the game, and I have no faith in him to properly execute a Soria trade.
Posted by: scribbletone | October 27, 2009 at 02:38 PM
good guy and a good ballplayer the rays were smart to bring him back
Posted by: redsox22 | October 27, 2009 at 02:59 PM
Well of course, it's Dayton Moore. He's decimated this team with his fetish for former Seattle players.
A trade between the Rays/Royals is a match made in heaven on paper though. The Rays can get an elite closer who is cheap (approximately 5 years for 30 million dollars) and a pretty good RF who can also play 3B/1B in relief of Longoria/Pena if need be.
In return, the Royals receive prospects they so desperately need to shore up the middle infield and bullpen.
Of course, Dayton will find a way to mess this up.
Posted by: TwinRoyals | October 27, 2009 at 03:09 PM
Guys, Q: where do you think FanGraphs gets their money from? A: Kickbacks from players, managers, agents and scouts. They inflate the players value so much, like the worst Used Car Salesman in Detroit!!!!! Something it's got to stick on the wall....Gabe Kapler is not worth the minimum salary, but it's Maddon buddy, so......How much for Gabe Gross now????
Posted by: Luis D | October 27, 2009 at 03:17 PM
He wasn't even worth that in 2009 Scribble. Please stop defending moronic valuations. Obviously 1 WAR is being valued at too much money.
Posted by: Kinsm | October 27, 2009 at 03:18 PM
@Kinsm:
1 WAR is just that, wins above replacement (which assumes a replacement player is free). If it makes you feel better, knock off the $400k from his value.
The values themselves are based on salary to WAR ratio and is recalculated every year. It obviously fluctuates, but it is a good method to see how much someone WAS worth.
Generally run prevention is undervalued when people assign salaries (though it has gotten better), but people still think about offense. I'm sorry you don't appreciate the system, but it does work.
Posted by: Piccamo | October 27, 2009 at 03:39 PM
"There's no way anyone would pay Kapler over $5 million in 2009 or 2010, so how can it really be accurate?"
I had this same problem too, until I asked Dave Cameron some questions and he explained. The dollar values are not a suggestion of what the player will get paid. Just a translation of the amount of value the player provided. Figgins might have been worth $20 mil this year, but they are not suggesting he'll get that annually in free agency. Kapler's defensive skill is simply undervalued by the market, so he presented a good opportunity for the Rays.
On the flip side they'll tell you Jermaine Dye had negative value this year, but surely he will sign for $3MM+ in 2010.
Posted by: Tim Dierkes | October 27, 2009 at 03:44 PM
Gabe Kapler...WTH!!! They invested 1 million dollars or so for this guy. What a million dollar waste; that money could had been used on a young closer. Also, this is taking away the development of Joyce, Jennings, and Perez. Maddon has to have a Gabe on the roster. If they sign Gabe Gross, I makes me want to throw up. I don't get this at all.
Posted by: galloway84 | October 27, 2009 at 05:18 PM
Trade proposal I thought of, let me see if you Rays fans like it or not.
Rays get:
RP Jokahim Soria
RF Mark Teahan
Royals get:
C Dioner Navarro (assuming you tender him)
SS Reid Brignac
RP Calvin Medlock
RP Thomas Rafferty"
anything that will get rid of brignac, only cause i would be very upset to see bartlet go for any reason.
Posted by: IgotBASEballs | October 28, 2009 at 02:06 PM
im not too excited about the rays signing this guy. both Gabes have all right defense but sub average hitting. im confident that the rays will deal upton thus having to bring up jennings and zobrist playing as an everyday OF. so hopefully we wont see much of the Gabes....
Posted by: IgotBASEballs | October 28, 2009 at 02:12 PM
1) I doubt the right-handed Gabe Kapler (who, at this point, can only hit lefties) will significantly impair the development of lefty Matt Joyce or switch hitter Fernando Perez. This is especially true if the Rays deal either Upton (unlikely) or Crawford (more likely) this offseason, leaving more holes to fill.
2) Perez is entering his age 27 season, having accrued a total of 58 professional at-bats this season. I don't think Gabe Kapler is what he should be worrying about.
3) Tampa Bay has always showed they've willing to play a young player over a veteran, *given* they are performing well. For example, Matt Joyce, a 24 year old corner outfielder essentially repeating AAA, had only an 855 OPS in the minors; is it really so surprising that he didn't have a spot on an ML roster of a contending team?
4) This move is pretty much inconsequential. It means that on Opening Day, the Rays will have Gabe Kapler. But based on the length and amount of the contract, he could easily be released / traded midway through the season, if there really is that much depth in the Rays' outfield. I seriously doubt $1 million is what's standing between Tampa Bay and, say, acquiring a "young closer" (anyway, young implies cost controlled, which implies money isn't a concern to begin with).
Posted by: ugen64 | October 29, 2009 at 09:31 PM
Great move by the Rays props to the GM
Posted by: Martin | November 04, 2009 at 09:46 PM