Headlines

  • Angels Acquire LaMonte Wade Jr.
  • Braves Designate Craig Kimbrel For Assignment
  • Corbin Burnes To Undergo Tommy John Surgery
  • Braves Select Craig Kimbrel
  • Jerry Reinsdorf, Justin Ishbia Reach Agreement For Ishbia To Obtain Future Majority Stake In White Sox
  • White Sox To Promote Kyle Teel
  • Previous
  • Next
Register
Login
  • Hoops Rumors
  • Pro Football Rumors
  • Pro Hockey Rumors

MLB Trade Rumors

Remove Ads
  • Home
  • Teams
    • AL East
      • Baltimore Orioles
      • Boston Red Sox
      • New York Yankees
      • Tampa Bay Rays
      • Toronto Blue Jays
    • AL Central
      • Chicago White Sox
      • Cleveland Guardians
      • Detroit Tigers
      • Kansas City Royals
      • Minnesota Twins
    • AL West
      • Houston Astros
      • Los Angeles Angels
      • Oakland Athletics
      • Seattle Mariners
      • Texas Rangers
    • NL East
      • Atlanta Braves
      • Miami Marlins
      • New York Mets
      • Philadelphia Phillies
      • Washington Nationals
    • NL Central
      • Chicago Cubs
      • Cincinnati Reds
      • Milwaukee Brewers
      • Pittsburgh Pirates
      • St. Louis Cardinals
    • NL West
      • Arizona Diamondbacks
      • Colorado Rockies
      • Los Angeles Dodgers
      • San Diego Padres
      • San Francisco Giants
  • About
    • MLB Trade Rumors
    • Tim Dierkes
    • Writing team
    • Advertise
    • Archives
  • Contact
  • Tools
    • 2024-25 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2024-25 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • Projected Arbitration Salaries For 2025
    • Free Agent Contest Leaderboard
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Agency Database
  • NBA/NFL/NHL
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors
  • App
  • Chats
Go To Pro Hockey Rumors
Go To Hoops Rumors

Which Draft Picks Each Team Would Receive For Losing A Qualified Free Agent

By Mark Polishuk | November 3, 2022 at 1:58pm CDT

Earlier today, MLBTR’s Tim Dierkes outlined what each team would have to surrender as compensation if it signed a free agent who rejected a qualifying offer.  Now, let’s take a look at what each team would receive in return if one of their free agents turned down a QO and signed with another club.  (As a reminder, players can’t be issued a qualifying offer more than once during their careers, and this year’s QO is set for $19.65MM.)

Revenue Sharing Recipients: Diamondbacks, Orioles, Reds, Guardians, Rockies, Tigers, Royals, Marlins, Brewers, Twins, Athletics, Pirates, Mariners, Rays

If any of these teams has a QO-rejecting free agent who signs elsewhere for more than $50MM in guaranteed money, the compensatory pick falls after the first round of the draft.  That means a pick that could fall within the top 30, since the Mets’ and Dodgers’ first selections dropped out of the first round because they exceeded the luxury tax threshold by more than $40MM.  If a team has a QO-rejecting free agent who signs elsewhere for less than $50MM guaranteed, the compensatory pick would come between Competitive Balance Round B and the start of the third round (roughly 75th-80th overall).

This winter’s free agent class doesn’t consist of many players who are plausible QO candidates from any of these team, except for possibly Mariners outfielder Mitch Haniger.  If Seattle did issue Haniger a qualifying offer, however, the compensation issue might still be a moot point since there is a chance Haniger might just accept the offer (after an injury-shortened season) and remain with the M’s.

Teams Who Don’t Receive Revenue-Sharing Funds, And Who Didn’t Pay The Competitive Balance Tax: Braves, Cubs, White Sox, Astros, Angels, Giants, Cardinals, Rangers, Blue Jays, Nationals

For these teams, the compensatory pick for losing a qualified free agent would also fall between CBR-B and the start of the third round (regardless of whether the player signed for more or less than $50MM).

Dansby Swanson (Braves), Willson Contreras (Cubs), and Carlos Rodon (Giants) will all surely receive qualifying offers.  Cardinals third baseman Nolan Arenado would’ve also been an obvious pick, except he chose to avoid free agency altogether in deciding to not opt out of his contract.

Competitive Balance Tax Payors: Red Sox, Dodgers, Mets, Yankees, Phillies, Padres

If a team exceeds the luxury tax, they still receive a pick if a qualified free agent signed elsewhere, but that compensatory pick falls after the fourth round of the 2023 draft.  That roughly works out to around the 140th overall pick in the draft, so it’s a pretty noteworthy drop from the 75-80 range from the previous grouping.

The penalty is more significant in this particular offseason, given how many of these teams have very prominent free agents that will surely receive qualifying offers.  The Yankees have Aaron Judge, the Dodgers have Trea Turner and maybe Tyler Anderson, the Red Sox have Xander Bogaerts and probably Nathan Eovaldi, and the Mets have a full quartet — Jacob deGrom, Edwin Diaz, Chris Bassitt, and Brandon Nimmo.

Exceeding the tax line can be seen as the cost of doing business, given how five of the six payors made the playoffs and the Phillies are competing for the World Series.  For the Red Sox, however, crossing the CBT threshold is doubly painful, as Boston didn’t even post a winning record in 2022.

Share 0 Retweet 6 Send via email0

Boston Red Sox Los Angeles Dodgers MLBTR Originals New York Mets New York Yankees Philadelphia Phillies San Diego Padres

Pirates Promote Mendy Lopez To Coaching Staff
Main
Outright Assignments: Wallach, Ellis
View Comments (41)
Post a Comment

41 Comments

  1. #1WhiteSoxFan

    3 years ago

    Yikes!
    That’s a lot to memorize.

    1
    Reply
  2. gary55wv

    3 years ago

    Just have a salary cap and be done with it!

    5
    Reply
    • balloonknots

      3 years ago

      I’m for cap with a minimum

      7
      Reply
      • drasco036

        3 years ago

        If there is a penalty for spending, there should be a penalty for not spending and if you do not spend, you should be placed on probation, draft picks taken away just like if you spend too much. If owners continue to not spend then they should be forced to sell their team.
        Ten teams shouldn’t have to carry the other 20.

        10
        Reply
        • balloonknots

          3 years ago

          Agree
          But that market cap needs to be much lower than players union would accept for the fairness of the sport

          2
          Reply
        • deweybelongsinthehall

          3 years ago

          How do you institute changes when the CBA was just negotiated? Especially during times of inflation when many of those teams will have more issues filling stadiums, selling merchandise, etc.?

          Reply
        • Jesse Chavez enthusiast

          3 years ago

          @drasco

          I agree, it’s ridiculous to have an MLB Franchise and a payroll of 30 million dollars. I’d be happy if they set a floor at around 70-80 million.

          3
          Reply
        • JoeBrady

          3 years ago

          Ten teams shouldn’t have to carry the other 20.
          ==============================
          Actually, they do. As large as the US is, there are only 10 cities with a population of 1M+. And another 7 with populations of 750k-1M.

          To see the context, there are only 6 cities larger than the Bronx.

          1
          Reply
        • libertyfighter

          3 years ago

          What are the Metropolitan area numbers? You aren’t telling the whole story!

          Reply
        • drasco036

          3 years ago

          As interesting at that is, city population doesn’t matter. For starters, you’re only taking into consideration the city population and not the surrounding areas. I.e. Las Vegas “only” had a population of 600,000 but Henderson, which basically adjoins Las Vegas has a population of over 300,000. Nashville may show around 700,000 people but Murfreesboro and Clarksville have a population over 150,000 a piece.

          On top of that, St Louis is a revenue sharing team with a population of around 300,000…. You also are not taking into consideration “media market”, Nashville again, with its population is split between fox sports south and fox sports Ohio (luckily media market wise, St. Louis doesn’t bleed in).

          The fact is, teams in “smaller markets” do a terrible job promoting their teams and driving interest. The Cubs are vastly more valuable and earn more money than the White Sox. It’s up to team owners to drive the popularity of their teams up, make them more profitable/valuable.

          Reply
      • Murphy NFLD

        3 years ago

        Cap sucks as a hockey fan your even ore likly to not resign your young guys. But there without a doubt should be a floor in mlb, even if that is only applicable to the revenue shearing teams. Its hilarious the mets can pay a pitcher who plays 1/5 more per year then 3 teams pay the while team. I know the mets are 1 of the big 5 or 6 teams but clearly something needs to be fixed when thats a thing

        Reply
        • AgentF

          3 years ago

          Hockey is the perfect example of why people should be massively opposed to a cap… yet some seem to see it as a good thing. it’s absolutely ridiculous in my opinion. Owners need to be held accountable at some point, too. Don’t like dwindling gate sales? Do something to make your product more attractive. Why the hell should these mega millionaires/billionaires benefit from neglecting their their businesses and instead claiming it as the fault of a broken framework. Pittsburgh has roughly 2.5mn people living in its metropolitan area and one of the most beautiful stadiums in all of baseball. There is no excuse for cutting payroll by 30% between 21 and 22 and fielding a team with a combined annual wage less than many teams pay single players. Oakland, over 4.5mn in the bay area and the stadium looks like a crack den. Owners need to just be better… much better!

          1
          Reply
      • luckyh

        3 years ago

        The minimum is more important than the cap. I say just add that to the existing. Too many pocketing it and not spending it as intended.

        Reply
        • YaySports

          3 years ago

          There’s no way owners would ever agree to a floor without a cap though. Wouldn’t make any sense for them to do that.

          Reply
      • JackStrawb

        3 years ago

        Forcing teams to spend money is counterproductive and only sets off another round of salary inflation.

        End baseball’s monopoly exemption. It’ll also be more fun.

        Reply
    • outinleftfield

      3 years ago

      The MLBPA has said that is not an option. The reason is that revenue is not shared 100% between teams. So if you can get all the owners to agree on getting rid of local TV deals and sharing revenue 100% like they do in the sorts that have a hard cap like the NFL and NHL, then I am sure the union would agree to a hard cap and hard minimum.

      Reply
    • Col_chestbridge

      3 years ago

      The MLB will not implement a salary cap because they have unequal revenues and are unwilling to change that. So long as the Dodgers make $325m/year on cable while the Guardians make $40m/year these two teams cannot be expexted to spend the same (there’s sharing that blunts this, but not entirely).

      Look at NFL/NBA/NHL and you’ll see that the caps exist as a way to guarantee a percentage of revenue to the players (around 50%). The teams split money evenly and the cap thresholds (minimum, max, and hard cap) are all calculated in such a way as to make leaguewide spending approximate that agreed upon percentage.

      MLB spends far less than that percentage on its players. The 2019 season (last season before covid weirdness), they were actually under 40%. They’ll never seriously suggest a realistic cap to MLBPA.

      Reply
      • JoeBrady

        3 years ago

        MLB spends far less than that percentage on its players. The 2019 season (last season before covid weirdness), they were actually under 40%. They’ll never seriously suggest a realistic cap to MLBPA.
        ====================================
        That’s because the MLBPA players and front office are stupid. They cling to this incredibly stupid concept of “no cap” without ever once questioning the concept.

        The owners jumped on cable, ownership of regional sports networks, social media, gambling, and in the near future, ball parks as an anchor for real estate complexes. The players are still holding onto their mantra from the early 90s, and the owners let them think they are winning.

        Reply
  3. chopper2hopper

    3 years ago

    Just want to point out that the Sox actively chose to not give Carlos Rodon a qualifying offer last offseason which he most certainly would have declined, in effect giving away their would-be draft pick competition to the Giants. Winning move right there.

    4
    Reply
    • AngelsFan1972

      3 years ago

      The real irony would be if the White Sox re-sign him and have to GIVE UP a draft pick because the Giants offered him a QO.

      Had the White Sox offered a QO, the Giants would not have been able to. So the White Sox would have lost out on 2 draft picks.

      7
      Reply
  4. DonOsbourne

    3 years ago

    Is total revenue the deciding factor in who receives revenue sharing and who doesn’t?

    Reply
    • Holy Cow!

      3 years ago

      48% of local revenues are shared.

      Reply
      • outinleftfield

        3 years ago

        That does not include revenue from the part of TV networks that are owned by some teams. It also does not include sponsorships and in park advertising.. Just ticket sales, and local TV and radio. The way it works is all teams put in 48% of ticket sales and their local TV and radio revenue into a pot and that is split equally between all teams. Two huge issues with it. #1, a team that owns part of their TV network has a huge revenue stream that is not shared. #2 teams with huge TV deals, read Yankees, Dodgers, are keeping 55.33% of that huge revenue stream while teams that were not lucky enough to be in the largest TV markets are keeping 55.33% of much smaller TV revenue.

        Reply
  5. drasco036

    3 years ago

    The whole competitive balance rules are stupid, well if you’re this you get this and if your that you get that unless you’re one of these guys who get something else completely….

    Just make one rule for losing and receiving picks. Teams shouldn’t be rewarded for not spending, losing games and not being self sufficient and profitable.

    With the run the Indians and Brewers have had recently, making several playoff appearances over the past several years, you cannot tell me they “have to trade Corbin Burns” or “need to trade Ahmed Rosario”. They make money, they have newish stadiums and have corporate sponsored, city paid for ball parks.

    3
    Reply
    • sfes

      3 years ago

      it’s ironic that some teams with extremely rich histories and huge fan bases are “small market”

      2
      Reply
    • balloonknots

      3 years ago

      Mlb economics are stacked for the few and why certain markets will never have a fair chance to win. Everyone always likes to point to small market teams who don’t spend. I question the large market teams who don’t spend comparably as percentage of total revenue.
      A league of Goliath vs Davids
      Good for the lower revenue teams who spend wisely (meaning players under 30) and provide a quality product for their fans. Even so small n mid markets have to really get lucky in order to bring a trophy

      1
      Reply
  6. Texas Outlaw

    3 years ago

    I’m all for a salary cap. Do away with luxury tax crap.

    2
    Reply
    • balloonknots

      3 years ago

      Only Mets and Dodgers ignore the tax threshold as they should – all other large markets get to keep profits under pretext of the luxury tax. Lol be done with it.

      It’s terribly unfair to small market teams when they don’t receive the revenue needed due to certain wealthy teams not spending as they should. But than again some will just pocket the cash. Not a win win deal on either side

      Reply
    • MLB-1971

      3 years ago

      Players association will NEVER agree to a salary cap.

      Lol. The strike would still be going, and going

      2
      Reply
  7. DBH1969

    3 years ago

    Eliminate the Lux Tax, Competitive balance, Qualifying offers. No spending cap, no min cap…
    BUT…
    Get rid of this guaranteed contract and opt out and no trade clause stuff.

    If a team wants to sign a guy for 43 years at 8 billion a year, let them… If a player sucks a year after signing the contract, cut him.

    1
    Reply
  8. citizen

    3 years ago

    what if the braves lose jansen on a rainy tuesday or the twins lose correa on a friday?

    Reply
    • casorgreener

      3 years ago

      LOL Yeah this is ridiculous

      Reply
  9. sliderwithcheeze

    3 years ago

    Salary caps are for the weak. If you can’t raise enough capitol to compete with the large markets, fold.
    I cannot begin to tell you how many owners have contacted me for assistance or offered to sell me their franchise. It’s gotten so ridiculous, I no longer answer their call.

    2
    Reply
    • Astros Hot Takes

      3 years ago

      *calls

      2
      Reply
  10. compassrose

    3 years ago

    The big and mid market teams have to get lucky to win the World Series? Not really draft right and develop your own players works well. You have 4-5 players on rookie contracts a few stars and a few fillers. Just like Seattle. You don’t have to sign players for longer than most of us will be alive. Unless you get a Julio that signs a team friendly contract.

    I would like to see MLB get closer to the NFL draft. The NFL draft is more fun to watch because of trades teams moving around etc. I know because I said NFL some might disagree on that but I said like it. I guess trading draft picks is mostly what I ask getting at. Love watching the draft but it doesn’t have the same feel as the NFL. I like fully guaranteed contracts but I think there should be a clause that if a player gets hurt and has to retire the contract is dropped to 50% of the original. It can also be negotiated to what both player and team agree to.

    Reply
    • outinleftfield

      3 years ago

      Difference is you will absolutely see the players drafted in the NFL that season. In MLB, if you see them at all, its 3-4 years later for top draft picks

      1
      Reply
      • compassrose

        3 years ago

        I would agree to that. You will also have more 1st rnd picks fail to do anything. Some will never get past AAA. Football teams at times push that top player faster than they should.

        Still think it would make the draft more interesting. MLB does have the reaches for teams trying to save money for another guy they take in the next couple rnds.

        Reply
  11. urnuts

    3 years ago

    Competitive Balance Tax Payors: Red Sox, Dodgers, Mets, Yankees, Phillies, Padres

    Interesting 5/6 teams in the playoffs. Another reason the Angels need to match their SoCal Padres in payroll and make it 6/7.

    Artie likes flash to a certain point, allow your front office to make the player decisions and eat the contracts he pushed through.

    Reply
  12. BFFLR

    3 years ago

    Salary cap and floor with revenue sharing just like every other major sports league in this country if you want equal competition!

    Reply
  13. Bright Side

    3 years ago

    If these small market teams can’t increase payroll to become competitive, then relocate to bigger markets. Otherwise screw them. I hate collectivism.

    Reply
    • JoeBrady

      3 years ago

      That’s ridiculous. The US only has four cities with a population of 2M+. It’ll look pretty funny having 30 teams playing in 4 cities.

      I don’t think y’all have any idea of the model of having a country-wide sport is. It is to make the sport popular for EVERYONE.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Please login to leave a reply.

Log in Register

ad: 300x250_1_MLB

    Top Stories

    Angels Acquire LaMonte Wade Jr.

    Braves Designate Craig Kimbrel For Assignment

    Corbin Burnes To Undergo Tommy John Surgery

    Braves Select Craig Kimbrel

    Jerry Reinsdorf, Justin Ishbia Reach Agreement For Ishbia To Obtain Future Majority Stake In White Sox

    White Sox To Promote Kyle Teel

    Sign Up For Trade Rumors Front Office Now And Lock In Savings!

    Pablo Lopez To Miss Multiple Months With Teres Major Strain

    MLB To Propose Automatic Ball-Strike Challenge System For 2026

    Giants Designate LaMonte Wade Jr., Sign Dominic Smith

    Reds Sign Wade Miley, Place Hunter Greene On Injured List

    Padres Interested In Jarren Duran

    Royals Promote Jac Caglianone

    Mariners Promote Cole Young, Activate Bryce Miller

    2025-26 MLB Free Agent Power Rankings: May Edition

    Evan Phillips To Undergo Tommy John Surgery

    AJ Smith-Shawver Diagnosed With Torn UCL

    Reds Trade Alexis Díaz To Dodgers

    Rockies Sign Orlando Arcia

    Ronel Blanco To Undergo Tommy John Surgery

    Recent

    Angels Acquire LaMonte Wade Jr.

    Blue Jays Recall Spencer Turnbull For Season Debut

    Orioles Notes: Westburg, Mullins, O’Neill

    Tigers Notes: Vierling, Olson, Urquidy, Boyd

    Twins Place Zebby Matthews On 15-Day IL, Reinstate Danny Coulombe

    Yankees Claim CJ Alexander

    Phillies Claim Ryan Cusick, Designate Kyle Tyler

    Brewers Claim Drew Avans

    White Sox Sign Tyler Alexander, Place Jared Shuster On 15-Day IL

    Orioles Designate Matt Bowman For Assignment

    ad: 300x250_5_side_mlb

    MLBTR Newsletter - Hot stove highlights in your inbox, five days a week

    Latest Rumors & News

    Latest Rumors & News

    • 2024-25 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • Nolan Arenado Rumors
    • Dylan Cease Rumors
    • Luis Robert Rumors
    • Marcus Stroman Rumors

     

    Trade Rumors App for iOS and Android

    MLBTR Features

    MLBTR Features

    • Remove Ads, Support Our Writers
    • Front Office Originals
    • Front Office Fantasy Baseball
    • MLBTR Podcast
    • 2024-25 Offseason Outlook Series
    • 2025 Arbitration Projections
    • 2024-25 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Extension Tracker
    • Agency Database
    • MLBTR On Twitter
    • MLBTR On Facebook
    • Team Facebook Pages
    • How To Set Up Notifications For Breaking News
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors

    Rumors By Team

    • Angels Rumors
    • Astros Rumors
    • Athletics Rumors
    • Blue Jays Rumors
    • Braves Rumors
    • Brewers Rumors
    • Cardinals Rumors
    • Cubs Rumors
    • Diamondbacks Rumors
    • Dodgers Rumors
    • Giants Rumors
    • Guardians Rumors
    • Mariners Rumors
    • Marlins Rumors
    • Mets Rumors
    • Nationals Rumors
    • Orioles Rumors
    • Padres Rumors
    • Phillies Rumors
    • Pirates Rumors
    • Rangers Rumors
    • Rays Rumors
    • Red Sox Rumors
    • Reds Rumors
    • Rockies Rumors
    • Royals Rumors
    • Tigers Rumors
    • Twins Rumors
    • White Sox Rumors
    • Yankees Rumors

    ad: 160x600_MLB

    Navigation

    • Sitemap
    • Archives
    • RSS/Twitter Feeds By Team

    MLBTR INFO

    • Advertise
    • About
    • Commenting Policy
    • Privacy Policy

    Connect

    • Contact Us
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS Feed

    MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com

    hide arrows scroll to top

    Register

    Desktop Version | Switch To Mobile Version