![]() |
|
|
| |
« Sosa Agrees To Deal With Rangers | Main | Rumor Roundup »
UPDATE: A source tells me the Pirates included shortstop Brent Lillibridge in the trade, and it's a four-player deal. That's quite a price - Baseball Prospectus's PECOTA system indicates that the college product would be baseball's ninth best shortstop in 2007 (based on projected WARP).
The above info is now confirmed by John Perrotto of the Beaver County Allegheny Times. The Braves are sending outfielder Jamie Romak to the Bucs to complete the deal.
According to the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, the Pirates have agreed to send Mike Gonzalez and another unknown player to the Braves for first baseman Adam LaRoche. Nice to finally put the daily LaRoche rumors to rest. Given the inclusion of Lillibridge, I'd say the Braves won another deal here.
Check out RotoAuthority to read the fantasy implications of this deal.
src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e200e553e161c98833
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Pirates Acquire LaRoche For Gonzalez:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
What would it take to get Gonzalez from Atlanta?
Posted by: tyler | January 17, 2007 at 03:58 PM
wow... nice signing for the Pirates. Not that the Braves are getting screwed, but the Pirates needed another bat.
Posted by: dan1to | January 17, 2007 at 04:08 PM
LaRoche for Gonzalez + Cota...
That's an even deal. Cota is probably one of the top 100 catchers in the league.
I can hope can't I?
Posted by: DirtyFreddy | January 17, 2007 at 04:11 PM
wow, mike gonzalez's profile says the pirates originally got him and freddy sanchez from the red sox for jeff suppan, brandon lyon, and a no name prospect. how stupid does that make the sox look right now?
Posted by: boomshwa12 | January 17, 2007 at 04:12 PM
Whew, finally this crap is over with, I have a feeling though that if it is not duffy, we spin gonzalez to get a leadoff hitter who is a leftfielder, but even if we keep gonzalez and get castillo, im a happy man.
Posted by: bravesbeast | January 17, 2007 at 04:12 PM
What should we expect from Thorman this year? I have heard some say he will be able to step right in and put up similar number to laroche. Others have said that he isnt quite ready to play everyday. Are Prado and Johnson legit replacements for Giles? Oh and whos gona lead off for the bravos?
Posted by: nrmax88 | January 17, 2007 at 04:16 PM
boomshwa12,
Gonzalez was drafted by PGH...was traded to BOS for Brandon Lyon and Anastasio Martinez, then when Lyon's elbow appeared to be injured, the deal was partially undone to include Jeff Suppan to BOS and brought Freddy Sanchez to PGH, so Littlefield almost let him go for very little a couple of seasons ago...
Posted by: Mick Kraut | January 17, 2007 at 04:22 PM
Boomshwa, that's not an actual trade.
The Red Sox got Gonzalez from Pitt in a deal where they sent Lyon. Lyon's physical came back that he had an injury, and so the Sox offered to rescind/amdend the trade giving back Gonzalez and taking back Lyon
Posted by: jpcrecom | January 17, 2007 at 04:23 PM
who becomes the closer? torres or capps?
Posted by: greenbaydude1232 | January 17, 2007 at 04:28 PM
Good deal for the Braves... They have one of the nastiest bullpens in the league now.... Soriano in the 7th, Gonzalez in the 8th and Wickman in the 9th.... As a Phils fan, Im not looking forward to that......
Posted by: allabouthephils | January 17, 2007 at 04:29 PM
Some fantasy baseball implications here if you're interested.
http://www.rotoauthority.com/2007/01/quick_implicati.html
Posted by: RotoAuthority | January 17, 2007 at 04:30 PM
o my bad nvm
Posted by: boomshwa12 | January 17, 2007 at 04:31 PM
oh and Martinez was returned to BOS in the deal as well...
From Baseball Reference:
"July 22, 2003: Traded by the Pittsburgh Pirates with Scott Sauerbeck to the Boston Red Sox for Brandon Lyon and Anastacio Martinez.
July 31, 2003: Traded by the Boston Red Sox with Freddy Sanchez and cash to the Pittsburgh Pirates for Brandon Lyon, Jeff Suppan, and Anastacio Martinez. "
http://www.baseball-reference.com/g/gonzami02.shtml
Posted by: Mick Kraut | January 17, 2007 at 04:35 PM
Thank God this deal is finally done so I don't have to hear the freakin' rumors anymore!!!
Posted by: stormstarter28 | January 17, 2007 at 04:38 PM
Hah, this deal makes me happy. It weakens the Pirates in the NL Central and adds competition for the Mutts in the East :)
Posted by: wmk51 | January 17, 2007 at 04:48 PM
Wow, I wonder how much of this may be a cost-cutting move for the Braves. The arbitration numbers were initiated yesterday and suddenly LaRoche gets traded today? Seems too coincidental to me... I bet the other player is a minor leaguer, even though Scheurholz insisted on 2 major-league ready players from Pitt. The demands of Laroche's salary may have forced Scheurholz to get less in return than he wanted... Damn cheap ass Time Warner, wheres Ted Turner when you need him?
Posted by: DonCoburleone | January 17, 2007 at 04:50 PM
I'm thinking Capps takes over, high 90's FB and probably the best control of any reliever in baseball make him a prime candidate. Also, it isn't like the Pirates will be competing this year so they should get a young guy comfortable in this role.
As for allaboutthephils, this is going to make the best 7-8-9 BP in all baseball I think. Wickman is Wickman and will get the save and Soriano and Gonzalez are two of the most dominant relievers in baseball, plus it now gives us another lefty. We sucked in one run games because our pen, now with a healthy rotation and as disgusting a pen as you'll see in the NL if not baseball, this team is going places. Thorman is a capable 30 HR guy with normal playing time I think, but I will miss Laroche's glove at first.
Posted by: was385 | January 17, 2007 at 04:53 PM
LOL, all the sudden the braves pen is nasty.Sure, you have 7/8/9 guys, what about everyone else? I like my pen, deeper and better, but I guess we will have to wait and see. What if Soriano is never the same after the line shot off his dome. Wickman is no spring chicken either. Gonzo has had an injury history. Only time will tell.
Posted by: nrmax88 | January 17, 2007 at 05:03 PM
nrmax, are you the dirty Muts fan?
Posted by: DonCoburleone | January 17, 2007 at 05:10 PM
"Sure, you have 7/8/9 guys, what about everyone else?"
Yates, McBride, Paronto, Boyer, Villareal, Cormier - I'd say that's plenty of backup for the best 7-8-9 trio in baseball...
Posted by: DonCoburleone | January 17, 2007 at 05:12 PM
nrmax, your pen is neither deeper nor better, and everyone knows it. I think even you know it.
Posted by: stormstarter28 | January 17, 2007 at 05:14 PM
I think id still take Neshek, Nathan, Rincon and Crain or Rodney, Zumaya and Jones but the Braves are right up there... The Mets aren't in the conversation... They can't compare.....
Posted by: allabouthephils | January 17, 2007 at 05:21 PM
nrmax, admit it, this move makes you nervous...
Posted by: DonCoburleone | January 17, 2007 at 05:24 PM
Lets not forget about Calero, Duscherer and Street either...... They are pretty nasty in Oakland.....
Posted by: allabouthephils | January 17, 2007 at 05:26 PM
"I think id still take Neshek, Nathan, Rincon and Crain or Rodney, Zumaya and Jones but the Braves are right up there... The Mets aren't in the conversation... They can't compare.."
Agreed that the Tiger's pen is still better, forgot about those guys. But the Mets pen has definately fallen behind the Braves. Mike Gonzalez is a younger version of Billy Wagner, and he's not even going to be closing for us!
Posted by: DonCoburleone | January 17, 2007 at 05:27 PM
Proctor-Farnsworth-Rivera will blow less leads after the 6th inning then Soriano-Gonzalez-Wickman
Posted by: tyler | January 17, 2007 at 05:27 PM
Actually, I live in So. Cal, and the Angels with Speier-Shields-KROD is definately pretty potent also...
Posted by: DonCoburleone | January 17, 2007 at 05:28 PM
uh guys...dont forget about boston, kc, stl, tb, who else am i forgetting?
HAHAHAHA LMAO
Posted by: greenbaydude1232 | January 17, 2007 at 05:33 PM
NO WAY IN HELL I take proctor farnsworth and rivera over any of the fore mentioned pens... that's just crazy talk......
Proctor Farnsworth and Rivera lol... thanks for the laugh
Posted by: allabouthephils | January 17, 2007 at 05:33 PM
How about as far as the entire pen goes? I'm not claiming the Yankees are the best (yet), but they're looking good:
Rivera, Proctor, Farnsworth, Vizcaino, Britton, Myers
And don't underestimate the advantage Rivera (and other top closers) have over their counterparts. Similarly, I still think the Braves' 1-3 are better than the Mets', but the advantage Wagner has over Wickman makes that closer than it seems.
Posted by: bobo | January 17, 2007 at 05:34 PM
"nrmax, your pen is neither deeper nor better, and everyone knows it. I think even you know it."
it sure makes me nervous..... I like the fact that you guys had to give up LaRoche to get him though... If I had to pick who made out on the deal.. Straight up Id actually give the edge to the Pirates because a position player is always more valuable than a relief pitcher... Especially one who hit 32 homers last year..... But that pen is pretty nasty... It's definately the best in the NL East and could be the best in the National league....
Posted by: allabouthephils | January 17, 2007 at 05:37 PM
Yankees bullpen, HA!... Yeah, Rivera makes the rest of the pen soooo much better, please. More like the 12 runs the Yankees score every game makes the bullpen better...
Posted by: DonCoburleone | January 17, 2007 at 05:41 PM
Let me just put it this way, the gonzo-soriano-wickman pen means a lot less blown saves, that is all i care about, i dont care if it is the best bullpen or not, it means less leads given up, the staff should improve, and the offense is still pretty potent, and all this means more wins for the braves
Posted by: bravesbeast | January 17, 2007 at 05:50 PM
"Straight up Id actually give the edge to the Pirates because a position player is always more valuable than a relief pitcher... Especially one who hit 32 homers last year...."
I would agree, but HR hitters are a strength of the Braves. Chipper, Andruw, Francoeur, and McCann are all capable of hitting 30+ Homers... So I think Pittsburgh got the better end of the deal by the slimmest of margins (unless Gonzo blows out his elbow or something...)
Posted by: DonCoburleone | January 17, 2007 at 05:52 PM
Check the post for an update!
Posted by: RotoAuthority | January 17, 2007 at 06:08 PM
Lillibridge? So this guy is supposed to be pretty good then? Who are the Braves giving up?
Posted by: DonCoburleone | January 17, 2007 at 06:18 PM
The Padre's Merideth Linebrink Hoffman is the best 7-8-9 in baseball. Plus, Cla Merideth usually goes more than one inning anyways.
Posted by: bcampy | January 17, 2007 at 06:22 PM
Dunno...that's all I know so far.
Posted by: RotoAuthority | January 17, 2007 at 06:23 PM
I'll take Rivera and three minor leaguers over the brave's 3.
Posted by: tyler | January 17, 2007 at 06:26 PM
Brent Lillibridge looks filthy, but I have to wait and see who the second player leaving ATL for Pitt is before passing judgement on this trade.
One thing's for sure, our 'pen is much better now than it was at this point last year and it's not even close. It has to be one of the top 3 in the NL and top 10 in all of baseball; last year we were damn near the bottom of any positive bullpen list.
Posted by: ejruiz777 | January 17, 2007 at 06:26 PM
Aight, the second player is no one I heard of. Check the post.
Posted by: RotoAuthority | January 17, 2007 at 06:36 PM
Romak had miserable a 2003 and 2004, then was awesome in 2005 before coming back down somewhat in 2006. All that, however, happened before the kid could legally by a beer, so who knows. He seems to have found his nitch in the OF and/or simply developed somewhat and looks to be a decent prospect. He's no Lillibridge, but he's not as far off as I would have liked.
Posted by: ejruiz777 | January 17, 2007 at 06:46 PM
from that shortstop's stats, he looks like he can flat out play, that might turn out to be a mistake by the pirates
Posted by: kevmill21 | January 17, 2007 at 07:01 PM
Rivera isn't gonna pitch three innings.... He may be the best closer ever.... he is also the most OVER RATED pitcher on the face of the planet....
Posted by: allabouthephils | January 17, 2007 at 07:01 PM
Wow, Wagner, Mota, Heilman, Sanchez, Burgos, Adkins, Feliciano, Schoenweis, Padilla, Dave Williams dont even get into the conversation? 5 guys who throw 95+ and we dont get into the conversation. Oh well. When the mets are leading the division again and the braves are 10 out im gonna be laughing my ass off
Posted by: nrmax88 | January 17, 2007 at 07:18 PM
Burgos sucks, just an example of how 95+ doesn't mean shit in baseball. It helps but doesnt carry you. Francouer will feast of that crap that burgos throws. Face it man, Gonzalez is more dominant than any of them, so is Soriano for that matter, and Wickman doesnt throw any incredible pitches, but he shuts people down
Posted by: was385 | January 17, 2007 at 07:28 PM
I dont remember who I was talking to about drafting and signing players based on their last names, but that makes Lillibridge a throw in who means nothing. Go buccos.
Posted by: ArodSucksAtLife | January 17, 2007 at 07:30 PM
Ooooo looks like was385 beat me to it about Burgos. A Mota-Heilman-Wagner 7-8-9 is good, damn good actually. There's just some others that are flat out better. Tigs, Padres, and yes the Braves now with Gonzalez come to mind.
Posted by: firesticks | January 17, 2007 at 07:31 PM
Not that Romak means shite either, infact by the last name theory the Braves made out cause Gonzalez is more reliable than LaRoche. Damn French Canadians....
Posted by: ArodSucksAtLife | January 17, 2007 at 07:31 PM
"Rivera isn't gonna pitch three innings.... He may be the best closer ever.... he is also the most OVER RATED pitcher on the face of the planet...."
From someone who roots for an AL East team, has actually watched post season baseball, and isn't a homer, you are completely wrong.
Posted by: ArodSucksAtLife | January 17, 2007 at 07:34 PM
ah losing lillibridge kills he had 57 steals last year which is on top of a 305 average but maybe juset maybe this romak kid will develop i much rather wouldve of gaven up duffy u got your wish chris duffy lovers
Posted by: piratefn7 | January 17, 2007 at 07:48 PM
Gonzalez is not that great. His WHIP the last two years was atrocious for a late-innings reliever. He just has a knack for getting out of trouble. It'll catch up to him eventually. Wickman is not a great closer either. One of the worst in the league IMO. He has injury woes as well. Soriano is usually injured as well and has lost a lot of velocity on his fastball according to reports coming out of WInter League. Other than that, yea, the Braves pen is awesome.
Posted by: thebull315 | January 17, 2007 at 08:50 PM
Mariano Rivera the most overrated pitcher ever?
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahhahahhahahahahahah
Posted by: tyler | January 17, 2007 at 08:55 PM
every year he is doubted. Wickman will be great once again and Gonzalez is unhittable. Why when talking about a Braves player does everyone suck? You must be a mets fan bull
Posted by: was385 | January 17, 2007 at 09:03 PM
Does this make the Braves have the best bullpen in the NL now? I think this puts them in the argument for at least top 3-5...
Posted by: Droptop | January 17, 2007 at 09:27 PM
Lets let Clay Meredith repeat last year first, then try calling them the best 7-8-9...
I'd put Speier/Shields/K-Rod ahead of the Padres 3 and I'm an A's fan. I wouldn't put Calero/Duchscherer/Street ahead of the Padres 3 but I wouldn't put them behind it either...
I'm inclined to think the Mets and Braves bullpens will be neck and neck next year.
Posted by: Droptop | January 17, 2007 at 09:34 PM
no, the Braves easily take down the mets pen. As a braves fan, nothing is certain with Wagner. He can be a choke artist in a tight spot.
Posted by: was385 | January 17, 2007 at 09:35 PM
i think braves pen is top 5 or so in the NL and got a lot better with gonzalez. they wanted to sure up the pen and they did just that with their moves.
i am a yankee fan and there are SOME 7-8-9 i would take over ours but just a few like - DET and OAK probably
Posted by: Yankee Fan 88 | January 17, 2007 at 09:36 PM
lillibridge is a soild player who gets on base like crazy - billy beane would love him
and
romak has some promise to be a decent 25-30hr guy at 1b
Posted by: Yankee Fan 88 | January 17, 2007 at 09:40 PM
From a Mets Fan:
I love this deal.
Laroche is a below avg 1B, but still a solid bat.
I forget the kid's name right now, but I think it was Thorman that they have coming up to replace LAroche.
I dont think Thorman is ready, nor do I think he's very good.
Franceour sucks.
Its funny how Soriano gets discounted to "he sucks" due to only drawing 60 or so walks, but Franceour is great even tho his walk totals are atrocious. I wonder why that's so....
Franceour is garbage.
He occassionally gets hot, but for the most part, he sucks.
The Braves have a nice pen, but thy always have a nice pen.
In the past, you could get good arms on the cheap and allow Mazzone to work with them.
Now a good arm in the pen costs you ur starting 1B.
I like it.
McCann is a solid hitter, but no lock to keep up his production. Who cares...he's not going to drive the braves.
Franceour is crap.
Chipper is great, but his body is falling apart. No way he plays a full season.
Andruw is a beast, but Beltran gives us that and more.
Mets pen vs Braves pen?
If Dirty Sanchez is Dirty Sanchez again, our pen will CRUSH that of the Braves. If he's half the man he was last year before injury, then our pen is still at least as good.
I'll put the Mets pen up against anyone.
Lets go to war u bitches.
Posted by: bsox21 | January 17, 2007 at 09:43 PM
bsox21,
nobody takes u seriously for god sake u think carlos beltran is better than albert pujols aka "best player in the MAJORS"
Bsox ur not a baseball fan ur just a die hard mets fan that is mad cause a catcher that hit .216 in the season blew ur chances for a world series.
ur even worse than cubs fan.
Posted by: samael88 | January 17, 2007 at 10:07 PM
and i dont need cubs fan yelling on me now.
cardinals 2006 world champions
Posted by: samael88 | January 17, 2007 at 10:08 PM
Yeah. Let's revisit the best bullpens idea. Where are the Nats. Wagner, Rauch, Cordero and a recovering Ayala. Yeah. That is right. The Nats have a solid pen.
So, please, respect.
Also, the Mets are terrible.
Schoenweis?? Dave Williams?? When did Mota become a stud? He's had a terrible last 2.5 years.
The Mets could be placed as a top 10 pen, but you can't decide which one is second best (Nats are best. NO. 1 Bitcheeees). Yeah. thats what you sound like. Which is the equivalent of what is floating in my toilet right now. Yeah. I'll give you a hint. It is not a calculator. Please, leave the stupidty behind.
Posted by: Das Cube | January 17, 2007 at 10:36 PM
"I'll put the Mets pen up against anyone.
Lets go to war u bitches."
That's hilarious...did you just call arguing on this website a "war"?
Posted by: stormstarter28 | January 17, 2007 at 10:36 PM
MY OPINION:
Braves - Soriano (7), Gonzales (9), Wickman (7)
Mets - Heilman (8), Sanchez (8), Wagner (9)
Wickman racks up saves, and that's it. He's not a good pitcher.
Posted by: JerseyMetFan | January 17, 2007 at 10:47 PM
samael88,
No matter what people say, real baseball fans here, even if they disagree, can easily see that I know my shit.
EVEN if they disagree with me, the informed fans here can at least see that I am no Mets homer.
Stormstarter,
I am not calling this website a war u moron.
I am calling the baseball season a war.
That is my way of saying I feel good about my team to go into the season right now and feel confident.
I am saying I love my bullpen and feel strongly that my team will compete.
Let me guess, you're a brain surgeon right?
Posted by: bsox21 | January 17, 2007 at 10:54 PM
well if that is all wickman does, then again the braves are sitting pretty and our good position to win the east
Posted by: bravesbeast | January 17, 2007 at 10:54 PM
I'm a moron because you didn't make yourself clear?
Yes, to answer your question, I am indeed a brain surgeon.
Finally, calling the baseball season a war is just as funny as calling this website a war.
Posted by: stormstarter28 | January 17, 2007 at 10:57 PM
"Wickman racks up saves, and that's it. He's not a good pitcher."
That makes no sense.
Posted by: beeniez | January 17, 2007 at 11:01 PM
"Wickman racks up saves, and that's it. He's not a good pitcher."
Have you ever looked at his stats. Over the past two seasons he has an ERA hovering around 2.5 and has converted 90% of his save opps. He doesnt have a nasty slider like Wagner or a 100 mph FB like Zumaya, but he pounds the K zone and gets a fair number of Ks and easy outs. Everyone bashes him, but when he comes in, we can turn off the TV. Also, Heilman doesnt come close to Soriano or Wickman. He is as streaky a pitcher as I have ever seen. Sanchez doesnt come close to Soriano either. Soriano has a 1.09 WHIP, over a K per inning, and around 7 H per 9 in the tougher league. Sanchez and Heilman don't come CLOSE to that.
Posted by: was385 | January 17, 2007 at 11:08 PM
If you knew your shit, you'd know how to spell Francoeur.
Also, if you're not 100% sure of a Thorman's name, how can you know he's not ready for the majors and not very good?
Posted by: classic17 | January 17, 2007 at 11:11 PM
Adam LaRoche has been a platoon player most of his career. Most teams still see him that way. He didn't start regularly until midway through the season so not many Braves fans were that accustomed to seeing him everyday.
He's good and his defense will be missed, but Thorman will be an adequate replacement. Certainly can't expect the same production, but he's no easy out.
The Braves have one of the best lineups in baseball. Laugh all you want, they scored tons of runs. They can afford to lose the production when other players (Francoeur, McCann, Jones, and Jones) all have 30 home run potential. LaRoche was relegated to 6-7 most of the year anyways, so it's not like we lost a bat in the middle of the lineup.
The Braves have one of the best bullpens in the league now. What was once our greatest weakness, is now possible our greatest strength. I'm not going to get too excited about Gonzo though, he's probably going to be spun off for more players.
Posted by: beeniez | January 17, 2007 at 11:30 PM
"No matter what people say, real baseball fans here, even if they disagree, can easily see that I know my shit."
Actually, knowing and regurgitating are two entirely different things.....
Posted by: PeteRose | January 17, 2007 at 11:34 PM
All this conversation needs is a die hard Phillies fan ..... hahaha...
I will say that the Phillies have the 4th best bullpen in the division as it stands right now.... Only the Marlins have worse... That's pretty bad...
Posted by: allabouthephils | January 17, 2007 at 11:38 PM
I take the Braves bullpen by a hair over the Mets.... Sanchez was injured last year... Mota likes needles in the ass and has been inconsistent the last 3 seasons... Heilman is pretty consistent and Wagner is Wagner.... Gonzalez has been lights out for three years now (the stats dont lie, under 3 ERA each year and over a K per inning)... Rafael Soriano is pretty nasty and Bob Wickman is consistent.... I take the Braves pen over the Mets.... It won't matter though because each pen is going to be lights out after 6 innings.... Each side should be happy....
Posted by: allabouthephils | January 17, 2007 at 11:41 PM
Im the one that has to worry about a bullpen... the Phils have Ryan Madsen or Geoff Geary as a setup man.... You wanna talk about worried !?!
Posted by: allabouthephils | January 17, 2007 at 11:42 PM
What really gets me about this Gonzalez/LaRoche trade is how it just came out of NOWHERE ... I mean, how come no one saw this coming??
*rim shot*
But seriously, about the bullpens ... arguing over who has the best bullpen BEFORE the season is played is the most pointless thing baseball fans could do. No one's gonna predict what their bullpen does. It's impossible. Don't try.
Posted by: nickjs21 | January 17, 2007 at 11:49 PM
True true true...
One name
Cliff Politte
Sub 2 ERA lights out during the world series run
Next season he was released.......
Posted by: allabouthephils | January 17, 2007 at 11:52 PM
i dont think wickman is that good ive never actually seen him but of the braves three id say gonzo sori then wickman.
i think if you just want an 8-9 the angels have the best because shields and k-rod are amazing when healthy. i think that next year the twins could become better though neshek is phenomenal and then nathan. overall 789 though i still say detroit.
as for NL. hm nobody in the west has that great of a pen except for SD who is consistently solid because hoffman is a perennial stud. the central... not too much there then the east theres the mets and braves now but id still give it to SD in a heartbeat. ATL second NY third then maybe LA
Posted by: giantspwner187 | January 18, 2007 at 12:01 AM
Okay, before the Braves fans start getting crazy with this "best bullpen in baseball" crap, or even just in the NL East- one, shouldn't we wait, oh, I don't know, maybe a day or two to make sure the Braves aren't flipping Gonzalez somewhere else? And two- while the Braves bullpen sure is better than it was, that's not saying much. Who wrote that Gonzalez is "unhittable"? The guy pitched to a 1.352 WHIP last year, that ain't unhittable. In fact, he's only been below a 1.3 once in his career, and that was three years ago. I love Soriano as much as the next guy and think the Braves stole him in that deal, by why the assumption that he'll return from injury to the exact same form as before, while D Sanchez is now suspect because he finished last year hurt? And as for the all important closer position- look, you want to argue that Wagner is overpaid and over rated, fine. But he's still better than Wickman by any measure, and it isn't close.
Posted by: jakec | January 18, 2007 at 12:02 AM
Lets get one thing straight: LaRoche had a good second half only. At the end of June, he was hitting .243 with 13 homers....As far as the Mets pen is concerned, its not going to matter because their starting pitching sucks.
Posted by: crimedog652 | January 18, 2007 at 12:06 AM
And Wickman's ERA was 1.04 for the Braves in 28 games and in the process he saved 18 of 19. That is solid
Posted by: crimedog652 | January 18, 2007 at 12:11 AM
Gonzo has a high WHIP because he walks quite a few. People aren't hitting the ball against him, just getting on-base. Kind of like Nolan Ryan - tons of walks but hard to hit.
Why does everyone think Wickman sucks? Because he doesn't throw 95 MPH? MPH is the most overrated stat. A major league hitter could time a jet once they've seen it a few times.
Until Gonzo actually suits up in a Braves uniform, I'm not going to think he is actually playing for us. There are too many trading opportunities for Gonzo, someone will crack under pressure and trade a ridiculous amount for him. Given that it's already a solid bullpen without him and the market right now, the Braves can ask for the moon.
Posted by: beeniez | January 18, 2007 at 12:23 AM
i completly agree, the braves can spin gonzo in a trade with like the yankees for cabrera and proctor, of course we would have to give up something else to even out the deal, or maybe in a three way to get a left fielder who can lead off, or maybe to boston for someone, there are tons of possibilites in which we could feel one or more needs with gonzo and still ahve a good bullpen
Posted by: bravesbeast | January 18, 2007 at 12:28 AM
Why does everyone think Melky Cabrera is good? Career .739 OPS? Pass.
I wouldn't send Gonzo for Melky and Proctor. Someone would definitely top that offer.
Posted by: JerseyMetFan | January 18, 2007 at 12:45 AM
"Why does everyone think Melky Cabrera is good? Career .739 OPS? Pass."
*Career* .739? He's barely played one season. He's good defensively, has speed, cannon arm, can hit for average and many scouts think he'll develop even more power. If you count, that's five tools.
A lot of people think he'll develop into an all-star. Don't forget he's young, cheap, and under control for the next 5 years. That plus Proctor, a reliable bullpen arm, would be a hell of a trade for the Bravos.
The worst Melky develops into is a fourth outfielder. Which even then, wouldn't be a total bust for anyone who has him.
Posted by: beeniez | January 18, 2007 at 01:00 AM
And does this move potentially put Renteria on the block?
Posted by: beeniez | January 18, 2007 at 01:35 AM
The Pirates got jobbed. Adam LaRoche's 2006 is only a little less convincing than Jacque Jones's. My prediction on LaRoche - .830 OPS next season. Talk to me this time next year. The Braves did the smart thing - sell while the stock was high.
Posted by: DentalPlan | January 18, 2007 at 02:27 AM
"As far as the Mets pen is concerned, its not going to matter because their starting pitching sucks"
This is probably the single most ignorant statement ive ever seen on this website. Thats really saying something too.
Posted by: nrmax88 | January 18, 2007 at 02:33 AM
As far as Proctor going to Atlanta, I might bust a nut, him and his flat fastball would get abused.
Posted by: nrmax88 | January 18, 2007 at 02:36 AM
So let me get this straight...You people actually think that...Mo is overrated...and Wickman is a beast...hahaha...
Posted by: RedSoxHater3 | January 18, 2007 at 02:52 AM
Wickman, while not the best closer in baseball, is still one of the elite ones. The "best" conversation starts and ends with Rivera, Rodriguez, and Nathan. Here's an old post of mine arguing that Bob Wickman is actually a very good closer, and it compares him to all the best in baseball - you might be interested about who may or may not be overrated ...
=================================================
You know what drives me nuts? The fact that if you're not Bobby Jenks, Joel Zumaya, or Billy Wagner closing out games, people like ths say "oh, he's hitable, and he won't be very good."
I would think that before someone would go and say something dumb like Bob Wickman isn't an elite closer, he would at least go do his homework. Look at Bob Wickman's career from 1997 (when he first started to get save opportunities. I will only include years in which he exceeded 40 IP, as anything less is too small of a sample size for the stats to bear much meaning. He missed all of 2003, and pitched partly in 2002 and 2004, so I will combine those 2 years as if it were just one season):
Year_____SV_____SVO_____SV%_____ERA_____IP
1997_____01______XX______XX_______2.73_____95.2
1998_____25______XX______XX_______3.72_____82.1
1999_____37______45______82.2%_____3.39_____74.1
2000_____30______37______81.1%_____3.10_____72.2
2001_____32______35______91.4%_____2.39_____67.2
'02 & '04__33______36______91.7%_____4.36_____64.0
2005_____45______50______90.0%_____2.47_____62.0
2006_____33______37______89.2%_____2.67_____54.0
Sure, Bob Wickman doesn't throw 97 MPH. He does however, throw 91 - 93 mph, with a very godd 2 seamer, a very sharp breaking low to mid 80's slider, and a decent changeup. And he has excellent command over all of his pitches, better than most pitchers. Rarely does Wickman aim for the outside corner, and end up laying a pitch down the pipe. If you've got command, you don't need 97+ mph to be great.
The most important stat here for a closer is the Save %. So over the last 4 full seasons, Bob Wickman has been a guy who closes out 90% of his games. Before that, when he was still relatively new at closing, he was still closing out over 80% of his games, which is still very good. How did some of the "elite" closers fare in 2006?
Name________________SV_____SVO_____SV%
06: Joe Nathan_________36_____38_______94.7%
06: K-Rod_____________47_____51_______92.2%
06: Mariano Rivera______34_____37_______91.9%
06: Bobby Jenks________41_____45_______91.1%
06: Trevor Hoffman_____46_____51_______90.2%
06: B.J. Ryan__________38_____42_______90.5%
06: Billy Wagner________40_____45_______90.0%
********************Bob Wickman***************************
06: Tom Gordon________34_____39_______87.2%
06: Chris Ray__________33_____38_______86.8%
06: Todd Jones________37_____43_______86.0%
06: Joe Borowski_______37_____43_______86.0%
06: Jon Papelbon_______35_____41_______85.4%
06: Brad Lidge_________32_____38_______84.2%
06: J.J. Putz___________36_____43_______83.7%
06: Huston Street_______37_____48_______77.1%
So, a Bob Wickman who has over the last 4 full seasons of closing, put up a SV% at 90% (give or take 1%), puts him right in the arms of the most elite closers in the game. If you were to look at Bob Wickman's stats only after he came to Atlanta, he was arguably the most effective closer in the game, saving 94.7% of his efforts (the same ratio as leader Joe Nathan), and posting a ridiculous 1.04 ERA, with 25 strikeouts in 26 innings.
For anyone to say our closer situation isn't flat out RESOLVED, is pure idiocy. Sports writers get a hard-on for guys who can throw the ball 100 mph, and think that's the only acceptable way to close out a game. I love the fact that we have a big fat hillbilly with decent stuff but exceptional command who goes out and gets the job done as well as anyone, and does it with 6 lbs of tobacco wadded into the side of his cheek because he just doesn't give a f***. Bob Wickman is the man, and for any writer to say the Braves still have bullpen trouble, simply means they were having a slow day of news to report, decided to pick on a team, and picked out the Braves bullpen without actually doing research and realizing our bullpen is pretty F'ing good, with not a single player posting an ERA over 4.00 in 2006.
___________ERA____WHIP___K/9
Wickman____2.67___1.22___7.00
Gonzalez___2.17___1.35___10.67
Soriano____2.25___1.08___9.75
Paronto____3.18___1.27___6.51
Villarreal___3.61___1.30___5.36
McBride____3.65___1.50___7.31
Yates______3.96___1.46___8.28
That is an awesome bullpen. You Mets fans want to talk about overall bullpen depth - you really shouldn't be, because you know you can't compete with that. Do you even have your bullpen decided yet? Or do you have Wagner, Heilman, Sanchez, a suspended Mota, the guy from Kansas City, and then not really anything else going for you? That's what I thought. Anyone with any common sense can tell our bullpen is going to be a strength in 2007. End of debate.
If you look at Bob Wickman's place on the list, you'll see something interesting:
Everyone below him would be considered more of a second-tier closer. Everyone above him, most people would consider to be elite. Then there's Wickman. Where does he fit? By his save % over the last few years, you'd have to say he fits more in line with the "elite" closers above him. However, by his "reputation" or "name-value," most people who don't look at his accomplishments very hard would consider him to be one of the second-tier closers, along the likes of a Tom Gordon or Todd Jones.
JUST CONSIDER THIS; OVER HIS LAST 4 COMPLETE SEASONS (COMBINING 2002 AND 2004 INTO ONE YEAR SINCE THEY WERE BOTH INJURY PLAGUED "HALF-SEASONS" FOR BOB WICKMAN), WICKMAN REGISTERED EXACTLY THE SAME AMOUNT OF SAVES IN EXACTLY THE SAME AMOUNT OF CHANCES AS DID BILLY WAGNER, WHO EVERYONE JUST ASSUMES IS BETTER THAN WICKMAN:
Bob Wickman
Posted by: vt_Brady2705 | January 18, 2007 at 06:24 AM