![]() |
|
|
| |
« Twins After Craig Monroe? | Main | Phillies May Only Have $10MM To Spend »
A trusted reader dropped me a line regarding a Bruce Levine appearance on ESPN Radio 1000. Remember, Levine was the guy who scooped the Jacque Jones trade.
Levine reported today that the Cubs are putting together a package of young talent in an attempt to acquire the Rays' Carl Crawford. That would leave the Cubs with a speedy, athletic outfield of Alfonso Soriano, Felix Pie, and Crawford.
The emailer says today's report did not mention names. Ronny Cedeno would certainly be a useful addition for the Rays, and you'd have to expect some premium pitching heading over as well. I'm thinking Rich Hill, Carlos Marmol, or both. The problem with these proposed blockbuster deals is they often open up new holes. Thoughts?
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e2010534a42724970c
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Cubs To Make Offer For Crawford?:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
I was thinking more like a package of Marquis, Marshall, Cedeno, & a low minor leaguer for Crawford.
Posted by: cubsbaseball | November 13, 2007 at 02:05 PM
To me, the Cub's rotation would looks pretty shakey without Hill, but I don't see the Rays accepting an offer that doesn't include him.
Posted by: Mr_Punch | November 13, 2007 at 02:05 PM
I just can't see the Cubs coming up with the best package for Crawford. While I think the package of Cedeno, Hill, and Marmol is somewhat reasonable, I think too many other teams who want Crawford could come up with something better if they got wind of that offer.
From the Cubs perspective, if they've agreed to let Dempster start, I can't see trading Marmol unless they sign Cordero and even trading Hill means that they are relying on Marquis, Marshall, and someone out of the scrap heap for 3/5 of their rotation. I just don't see this one happening.
Posted by: gonyanks21 | November 13, 2007 at 02:07 PM
I don't think the Rays would want or take Marquis. He wouldn't add anything to an AL East rotation. Marshall, maybe.
Posted by: Mr_Punch | November 13, 2007 at 02:07 PM
Or maybe Pie would be part of the package back and Foukdome, etc. is still part of the Cub's plan?
Can't see Hendry giving up Marmol under any scenario.
Posted by: cubz23 | November 13, 2007 at 02:08 PM
I would expect that if the rays trade Crawford to the Cubs they would ask first and foremost for Pie, for replacement's sake. That is unless the Rays have enough outfielders already (I can't be arsed to look it up right now).
But if they trade Rich Hill and Marmol it makes me think they'll definitely sign Kerry Wood and then try to sign a FA starting pitcher like Colon, Livan Hernandez or maybe even Jason Jennings.
I actually like this deal for both teams, except that if indeed it is the trade you propose, it opens up decent hole in the rotation for the Cubs. But it definitely makes your lineup legit.
Posted by: Something Profound | November 13, 2007 at 02:08 PM
I can't see the cubs parting with both Hill and Marmol for Crawford. I think the most likely scenario has the package centered around Pie and maybe one of those two. The seem very determined to sign Fukedome so I don't thing that they are completely abandoning pursuing him all of a sudden. The Cubs are a far better team with Fukedome, Hill, and Marmol, then with just Crawford. I think we are going after Crawford to play center while Fukedome is in right. This would end any chance for Pie to start and make him very tradeable.
Posted by: geosoto4mvp | November 13, 2007 at 02:09 PM
This is interesting, cause the d-rays and the cubs are my two favorite teams in the mlb ( go figure). Carl Crawford is my favorite player in baseball, and would love to see him in chicago. But giving up hill and marmol makes no sense from a cubs standpoint. I wouldn't put Marmol in any deal. And I am surprised Felix Pie wouldnt be included, since he is comparable to Carl Crawford. A deal of cedeno, sean marshall and kevin hart makes a lot of sense to me.
Posted by: sudansensation | November 13, 2007 at 02:11 PM
Crawford is awesome. Would allow the Cubbies to move Alfonso back into the 3/4/5 slots.
It's going to cost you Hill, Marshall, and other pieces.
Posted by: bjsguess | November 13, 2007 at 02:13 PM
Crawford would be a HUGE addition. He adds speed, which theyll need because Soriano wont be running much anymore, and Theriot most likely wont be starting next year. Hopefully they wont have to give up Hill in the deal. They should try to base the deal around Marshall, Cedeno and prospects. Fontenot? Gallagher? Wuertz or Ohman? The Cubs cant afford to lose Hill or Marmol. Go get Crawford then trade for Tejada and our lineup will be set.
Soriano- RF
Crawford- LF
Lee- 1B
Ramirez- 3B
Tejada- SS
DeRosa- 2B
Pie- CF
Soto- C
If they dont go get Tejada, I'd say add Pie in a three team deal with the DRays and go and sign Fokudome. His lefty bat will add much needed balance to this lineup. Then just put Crawford in CF and Fokudome in RF. Theriot can remain at SS until 09 when they find a real starting SS.
Posted by: RbCubsFan4Life | November 13, 2007 at 02:14 PM
Don't think the Rays need a replacement for Crawford. They have enough bodies without Pie. The Rays need arms.
Posted by: bjsguess | November 13, 2007 at 02:14 PM
yeah, and go get arod, johan, Cano,and cabrera too and the lineup will be set.
CF-Crawford
RF-Soriano
LF-Cabrera
SS-Arod
3B-Ramirez
1B-Lee
2B-Cano
C-Soto
P-Santana
get real
Posted by: trober81 | November 13, 2007 at 02:18 PM
Also, if the Rays are in fact looking for a shortstop, the addition of Omar Infante could signal that Theriot has been dangled in such a deal. In addition to Theriot, the Cubs could offer Murton or Pagan. With all of the big name vets he Cubs have, we seem to have lots of young, inexpensive, major league ready talent that would make such a deal possible.
Posted by: geosoto4mvp | November 13, 2007 at 02:18 PM
I say offer pretty much anything and anyone that isn't named Hill, Marmol, or Pie. That makes the deal very difficult...but the Cubs would be worse if they gave up Hill...bottom line. I can't see them getting better losing Marmol either. If the Rays will take other prospects like Patterson, Veal, Gallegher, Marshall, Murton...whoever else, fine. But any deal with Hill or Marmol makes this team worse.
Posted by: Aduncaroo | November 13, 2007 at 02:21 PM
Crawford would be awesome at Wrigley... a prototypical Pinella type guy.
I would regret losing Marmol and even Hill, but there is plenty of time to add a few less desirable arms via free agency.
I'd say plug your nose and make the deal.
Posted by: IowaCubs | November 13, 2007 at 02:22 PM
^ "and then go trade for tejada"
are you serious, if they trade for crawford, what chips do u suspect will be left over exactly????
Posted by: RenegadeRalphE | November 13, 2007 at 02:24 PM
RbCubsFan4Life,
Sorry dude, even if the Cubs do get Crawford, Soriano will most likely be moved down to the 4th or 5th spot, most likely the 4th because he really is not good protection for Ramirez since he strikes out so much... Although he could be in the 2 spot as well... I don't know
I'm personally not sure what to make of this deal, but I would rather give up Hill than Marmol. That being said, I'm not really sure if I would rather depleet our pitching or take a risk on Fukodome. Everyone says he is a sure thing, but so was Kaz Matsui as well...
Posted by: Sooner A Cub | November 13, 2007 at 02:26 PM
So when the Rays actually get/develop a star, they trade him for more prospects? Perhaps they should trade Upton and Pena for prospects too and continue fielding a AAA team -- forever. If they trade Crawford, they deserve never to win again. He's relatively cheap, he's great, he's signed for a few years. makes no sense. They can't just keep getting prospects or quantity -- they need some great players to be good, and Crawford is one.
Posted by: tonyb | November 13, 2007 at 02:26 PM
"While I think the package of Cedeno, Hill, and Marmol is somewhat reasonable..."
Somewhat reasonable?!?! That's WAYYYY to much for a highly overrated outfielder.
Posted by: chicagobubbleblog | November 13, 2007 at 02:28 PM
I say if the rays do trade crawford to the cubs Marmol or Hill if not both almost certainly have to be in the deal to make it worth it for the rays. they do have a surplus of OF but trading one of your best you better get really solid in your weaknesses pitching. so if you could get hill good middle of rotation guy and marmol solid bullpen arm and another player it would be a decent trade i beleive. but hell i am a braves fan and we could sure as hell use him.
Posted by: thedeuce | November 13, 2007 at 02:31 PM
Hill AND Marmol??? No way!! Marmol is'nt going anywhere. His role is invaluable and he needs to stay in the role he excelled in last year.Maybe Cedeno,Marshall and Pie if we get Fukodome
Posted by: bleedintheblue | November 13, 2007 at 02:31 PM
Not to be a bubble-buster, but this doesn't happen without Rich Hill and at least 2 of the Cubs top prospects.
Throwing spare parts and Marquis around in a trade won't bring much in return.
Posted by: CarpeDiem | November 13, 2007 at 02:31 PM
I just don't see why the D-Rays would do this deal. They have a ton of pitching as is. I feel like they would want a stud catching and 1st base prospect. Pena is going to get expensive soon and catcher is the only position where they don't have a potential star come 2010.
Posted by: Ripwa | November 13, 2007 at 02:32 PM
The standard for whether a trade might happen isn't whether the team one likes wins it, it's whether the trade helps both teams in some way. The Rays are idiots if they do any version of this trade, so this trade shouldn't happen.
Posted by: tonyb | November 13, 2007 at 02:34 PM
as i've said in the past, i think any trade with crawford going to the cubs has to involve Soto as the starting point. Hill and Soto possibly?? although the rays do have a bunch of young arms waiting to get opportunities, they have an awful bullpen who blew a bunch of games last year. so there is where marmol comes into the picture. cubs fans, you need to quit trying to peddle marquis and marshall in every trade, they are not premeir trading chips.
Posted by: trober81 | November 13, 2007 at 02:37 PM
I can see Soto in there. Let's face it the Cubs can't get Crawford without hurting the team in other places, whether at catcher, shorstop, or in the rotation. Can't see it happening without Hill or Marmol.
Posted by: Tim Dierkes | November 13, 2007 at 02:38 PM
This trade doesn't make sense unless it is for Cedeno, Pie and pitchers other than Hill and Marmol. Marmol was the MVP of the Cubs last year. I would take my chances with Fukudome and Pie in the outfield before I gave up Marmol.
Posted by: cachhubguy | November 13, 2007 at 02:39 PM
Soto is the most valuable Cubs prospect. There is simply no way he would be moved for anyone. Ever. I'd get rid of Hill or Marmol, but not both, throw in Marshall with Marmol if the deal goes that way but Not Marshall and Hill. Whatever. The Cubs should do whatever they can to make this deal other than getting rid of Soto, and trying to avoid getting rid of both Marmol and Hill.
Posted by: CubsFan84 | November 13, 2007 at 02:41 PM
IF the Cubs get Matsui (Doesn't seem to be much competition) and Fukedome (Hendry's man-crush make this likely) the Cubs will easily have the best lineup in the NL Central and be one of the top 3 in the National League.
Soriano
Crawford
Lee
Ramirez
Fukudome
Soto
DeRosa
Matsui
Matsui had a very good year last year and if he can produce in a similar way this season, there is not really a weak point in that line up. Even if Matsui goes back to his .260 days with the Mets, he is a very good weakest link.
Soriano, Crawford, and Matsui are all good for 30 SB. Assuming Lee's second half suggested that he is finding his power stroke again, Soriano, Lee, and Ramirez are all good for 30 HRs, Crawford, Soto, and Fukudome at all good for 15-20 HRs. In addition to a very complete offense, the Cubs would also be one of the better defensive teams in the league.
Posted by: geosoto4mvp | November 13, 2007 at 02:42 PM
Levine should have a report on who is NOT trying to acquire Crawford. I'd imagine every team in baseball has kicked the tires on him.
And the D'Rays are notorious for overvaluing their players. Some of these offers are making me laugh. No one in the Cubs' rotation would succeed in the AL besides Zambrano, so I'd hope the D'Rays would accept their upper-20s 'studs.'
Posted by: tsizzle | November 13, 2007 at 02:42 PM
I question some of the potential lineups on here because several people have Soriano not batting first and not playing left field. These things will not change. There is ivy on the walls and Soriano is our leadoff hitter and left fielder for the next 7 years. In addition, the job of short stop belongs to Ryan Theriot until he proves that he can't play the position. Lou Piniella loves him and wants to use him. He had a decent season until the final month or so. I don't see him going out of the starting lineup or to another team. He will probably be in the 8 spot, however, until he can prove to be a more consistent hitter, and not as streaky.
As far as Crawford, the Cubs need a third solid outfielder after trading Jacque Jones and today Craig Monroe. I imagine the Cubs will get a decent AA prospect for him, probably some kind of reliever. The Cubs have had several offers for Rich Hill in the past and Hendry has turned them down. I don't think he will be traded. And Marmol is a closer candidate along with Bob Howry and Kerry Wood, now that Dempster is "moving to the rotation". We'll see how that goes. Personally, I think he should be traded. Here's the Cubs current rotation however:
Carlos Zambrano RHP
Ted (Roosevelt) Lilly LHP
Rich Hill LHP
Jason Marquis RHP
Sean Marshall LHP
Ryan Dempster RHP
Sean Gallagher RHP
The Cubs also have Angel Guzman coming off an injury and is probably in a make it or break it season. Now, all of these pitchers won't make it and Gallagher will probably end up at AAA at the start of the season. But the Cubs have enough starters. Marquis will be dangled in front of Tampa Bay because he is a veteran pitcher who will get 10-15 wins, something the "Rays" don't have a lot of. He's still a 4-5 starter in the American League though. Given that they only had 2 pitchers in double digit wins (and countless in double digit losses), the team I think would welcome him.
I think a realistic proposal is....
Jason Marquis
Will Ohman
Ronny Cedeno
Mike Fontenot or Kevin Hart
Tampa will probably want Hart because they REALLY need pitching and Hart is a good young pitcher. And I'd love to see Cedeno (or as several Cubs fans call him, E6) be gone. Fontenot is a good up and coming middle infielder. His hitting also needs to come along. I dont' imagine the Rays wanting him or the Cubs wanting to break up Fontenot and Theriot.
The Cubs lineup would look like this:
LF Soriano
RF/CF Crawford
1B Lee
3B Ramirez
2B DeRosa
C Soto
RF/CF Fukudome
SS Theriot
P
The Cubs are pursuing Fukudome heavily. He would be a great addition and would bat 7th or 8th depending on Theriot. He's a 10-20 home run guy with a decent average.
Posted by: DJ Freddie | November 13, 2007 at 02:43 PM
God I knew this entry was going to bring out the worst in Cubs' fans. The thought that this deal can be done without Rich Hill and another significant piece (maybe Marmol, maybe Pie, maybe something slightly less) is absurd. At least look at it this way: if Crawford is on the market, there are going to be a lot of teams offering more than Jason Goddamn Marquis and some B level prospects.
Posted by: beauhoopman | November 13, 2007 at 02:44 PM
I'm thinking Cedeno, Marshall, and Marmol might work out. However, I agree that Fukudome is still in the sight of the Cubs and that signing him makes Pie expendable.
A three way deal with Rays-Cubs-Orioles wouldn't surprise me. The Orioles have an interest in both Pie and Marmol, and have the young arms the Rays want.
Also, some people mentioned that the Rays have a crowded outfield. This is true, since its suspected BJ Upton will be converted to a center fielder once their prospect at third comes up and Iwanimora moves to second (short will probably be defensive minded). However, Pie is better than some of their outfielders, and they need speed without Crawford.
I wouldn't be surprised to see Pie, Marshall, Cedeno for Crawford. I'd be okay with this, I think the Rays would be also but I'm not sure.
Lastly, Soriano should stay leadoff. For the last time, he can still steal bases (2004 he was hurt and stole 18, followed by seasons of 33 and 41... 2007 he stole 19 and is perfectly capable of 30+). He bats much better at leadoff, and Crawford did fine lower in the order last year when the Rays were experimenting with it. Also, they need lefty batters to break up Lee Ramirez Soriano, so batting Soriano 5th wouldn't help (unless Crawford Lee Fukudome Ramirez Soriano... which isn't great)
Posted by: RandomScrub | November 13, 2007 at 02:44 PM
Not only should the Cubs try for Crawford, why not add to it, and get Scott Kazmir, too. Then, they could include both Rich Hill and Mark Prior. Hill, Prior, Felix Pie, Ronny Cedeno, and someone like Jake Fox should get that done. I will add, that the Cubs will give Crawford enough money, in a new contract, to get him to play CF. He has said int he past he would only play LF, and that has blocked deals in the past. The Cubs could still sign Fukudome for RF.
2008 Line up...
1. Soriano, LF
2. Crawford, CF
3. Lee, 1B
4. Ramirez, 3B
5. Fukudome, RF
6. DeRosa, 2B
7. Soto, C
8. Theriot, SS
2008 Rotation...
1. Zambrano, RH
2. Lilly, LH
3. Kazmir, LH
4. Marquis, RH
5. Marshall, LH
This team could get at least 15 HR from every spot in the line up except for Theriot, and 15 wins from the top 3 guys, at least.
Posted by: jlb1980 | November 13, 2007 at 02:47 PM
these are the absolute most ridiculous trade offers i have ever seen in my entire life!!! keep up the great comedy!
Posted by: trober81 | November 13, 2007 at 02:48 PM
Tim hit it on the head best. Any deal with Crawford is gonna cost Marmol/Hill or both. That will be the centepiece, NOT PIE. Cubs fans have to realize that Pie is not looked at as highly as they think. The Rays are loaded with OF'ers, hence one of the reasons they can part with a 5 tool player like Crawford. What the Rays need is pitching...not pitching prospects ( they have those too), but proven big leaguers.
Posted by: forlife61 | November 13, 2007 at 02:53 PM
Add this to the list - Cedeno/Veal/Patterson/Marshall for crawford - toss in Murton or Pagan too. Rays won't take Marquis - most likely will want Hill and Marmol thus killing deal.
Posted by: touchmymonkey | November 13, 2007 at 02:55 PM
touchmymonkey,
if all it took was to unload a few prospects and a bunch of unwanted players to get crawford, wouldnt everyone do that?
Posted by: trober81 | November 13, 2007 at 03:01 PM
I love Cubs fans, I am one, but many just aren't grounded in reality when it comes to trade speculation. Agreed that the Rays wouldnt be seeking Pie.
Posted by: Tim Dierkes | November 13, 2007 at 03:05 PM
Why do baseball fans get delusional when it comes to their favorite teams? The Cubs are going to land Crawford and Kazmir? Oh man! The Cubs aren't the team to pull that one off. Why on Earth would the Cubs self destruct their aleady iffy pitching for anyone? Offer Prior in a deal? Isn't he a potential free agent?
Posted by: coryjwilson | November 13, 2007 at 03:06 PM
Please fellow Cubs fans just stop. These trade ideas although humorous make our fanbase look idiotic.
I know not every Cubs fan who posted was way off base, but still.
Posted by: CubsFanInAustin | November 13, 2007 at 03:08 PM
My gut says that Fukudome is going to stay in Japan. What the Cubs should be trying to do is get a top #1,2,3 starting pitcher instead. Outfielders are a dime a dozen, quality starting pitching isn't.
Posted by: cubsbaseball | November 13, 2007 at 03:08 PM
There's no way Soto is part of the package, same with Hill.
Marmol should be the number one guy the cubs are willing to give up. He lives off his slider and teams are starting to catch up with it. We have a similar guy in Wuertz, who is disgustingly under-rated (#1 in MLB in inherited runners stranded and K's more then 1 per inning.) As long as we re-sign wood, our bullpen is very deep.
one of Marmol/Pie, Cedeno, and Marshall. MAYBE the cubs throw in eric patterson (hes in the dog house)
Posted by: NEILarado | November 13, 2007 at 03:10 PM
Of course rays would want Hill and Marmol - but all I was suggesting was that cubs would try to get it done with more prospects and players that don't fit cubs needs ( I guess that makes them unwanted but wouldn't that also make crawford an unwanted player?)- will it work - no - is it just throwing out a suggestion to see what other people think - yes. But thank you for pointing out the obvious.
Posted by: touchmymonkey | November 13, 2007 at 03:10 PM
I think that there are too many fantasy baseball players who comment on this blog. Crawford commands and deserves a huge bounty. Hill/Marmol/Soto are absolutely the right price for him, if even close to being enough.
I'm all for it as long as the Cubs have a plan to fill the holes. I'm glad that the Cubs at least have a GM willing to entertain the thought of pulling the trigger on a big deal.
Posted by: IowaCubs | November 13, 2007 at 03:12 PM
I would not trade Carlos Marmol for Carl Crawford straight up. Dumb move.
Posted by: Rms8874 | November 13, 2007 at 03:14 PM
any trade would absolutely include 2 of Hill/Marmol/Soto and one lesser player. Crawford's age and contract make him extremely valuable.
Posted by: craigos | November 13, 2007 at 03:22 PM
does anyone think a trade like this would go down before the winter meetings? i would think the rays would wait as long as possible to see what outfielders land where. if the dodgers for instance dont land a center fielder, then the rays could get them into the mix and weigh all available options. in that instance, the dodgers would have the better prospects, but sometimes a trade doesn't always happen involving the best prospects. teams look for what they need and for when they think they can compete. e.g. if the rays think they cant contend for another 3 years, the cubs and rays could complete a deal without hill, marmol, or soto being involved. maybe instead the deal is for multiple prospects that will be ready for that 3 year timetable.
Posted by: integr96 | November 13, 2007 at 03:29 PM
Carl Crawford = .315 11 80
Don't get me wrong he's good, but he's not an allstar or superstar.
K's have increase the last 4 years.
Marmol is the National League Equivalent to K-rod. In fact his numbers were better last year. He isn't going anywhere.
Rich Hill isn't going anywhere. Lefties with high K rates are rarely traded. Especially ones who have 4 years before free agency.
Soto is your everyday catcher next year.
Here is who I would look at Donald Veal or Pawleck, Patterson, and maybe Priors rights.
Posted by: Hack&Slash | November 13, 2007 at 03:34 PM
I won't even comment on some of these offers. Cubs fans are within their right to WANT to gain one of baseball's most promising OFers, and to WANT to keep their young pitching at the same time, but to EXPECT it is insane. Include Rich Hill, or don't make proposals.
Since I always have to look at this from the viewpoint of an Indians fan, I'm rooting for this trade to happen. With the glut in the OF that the Cubs would have, it would be nice for Shapiro to sweep in and offer pitching (covers up what you lost) for Matt Murton. The Indians get their left fielder, and the Cubs gain some pitching back.
Posted by: nickjs21 | November 13, 2007 at 03:41 PM
Crawfor is a guy the cubs would greatly need, and i do think they would have to start out any package with felix pie, I think a pie/hill/cedeno package would make this kind of trade happen. You would have dempster replace hill in the rotation or sign a F.A pitcher, you have Ifante as a backup shortstop/2nd baseman or can even use him in the outfield or sign another outfielder
Posted by: thursdaylnf2321 | November 13, 2007 at 03:44 PM
If the Indians want Matt Murton, all they would have to give up are the rights to Mud Cat Grant.
Posted by: cubbyrick | November 13, 2007 at 03:45 PM
I don't see how Crawford is over hyped. He is crazy good; is very consistent; and figures to stay one of the best outfielders in the game for a long time.
Seems very similar to the Vernon Wells situation, where toronto had to sign one of it's homegrowns just to show a commitment to winning.
But if the Cubs get Crawford, most importantly i would have to think that it would go a long way to making Jays fans happy, since he killed us last year !!! Go Cubs !!!!
Posted by: BaseBallz | November 13, 2007 at 03:53 PM
And I thought I was dillusional... The Cubs need a 1 or 2 hole hitter and a 5 hitter. Crawford solves one of those. Murton needs to be traded, he is not our RF. A 3 team deal with the O's could work out to be a monster deal for the Cubs. It could work out as such:
DRays get: Hill, Cedeno, Hart, 2 top 15 prospects from O's
O's get: Murton, Gallagher, Ohman, BJ Upton
Cubs get: Crawford, Kazmir, Brian Roberts
Cubs then spin off Pie in a deal with SF for Cain or Lincecum or to SD in a Peavy deal. Maybe Pie/E. Patterson for Cain. Or Pie/Veal for Peavy.
It would shape up as follows.
1. Crawford- CF
2. Roberts- 2B
3. Lee- 1B
4. Soriano- LF
5. Ramirez- 3B
6. Fokudome- RF
7. Soto- C
8. Theriot- SS
Rotation:
1. Zambrano
2. Peavy/Kazmir
3. Kazmir/Cain/Lincecum
4. Lilly
5. Marquis
Posted by: RbCubsFan4Life | November 13, 2007 at 03:56 PM
The deal can get done without Hill or Soto, but it would be getting extremely complicated. The way I see it, we'd have to go after the one thing that the Rays don't really have, a catcher.
Pie, Marshall, and some upper tier prospects (Gallagher, Veal, EPatt, Colvin, and the like) plus a guy like Wuertz to the Mariners for Clement... then we'd have to flip Clement, Marmol, probably Theriot and maybe even the rest of our good prospects to the Rays for Crawford.
So, yeah, we can probably pull something together based on Pie, Marmol, and Marshall... while still holding on to Hill and Soto, but it'd pretty much bankrupt our farm system except for Samardzija (who nobody will take).
Posted by: CubbieBlue66 | November 13, 2007 at 04:02 PM
I'm sorry but I'm a White Sox fan & if the Cubs got Crawford & sign Fukudome their line-up would be.
1.-CF-Crawford-LH
2.-SS-Theriot-RH
3.-1B-Lee-RH
4.-LF-Soriano-RH
5.-3B-Ramirez-RH
6.-RF-Fukudome-LH
7. -C-Soto-RH
8.-2B-DeRosa-RH
9. -P-Zambrano-SH
2008 Rotation...
1.-RH-Zambrano
2.-LH-Lilly
3.-RH-Dempster (Maybe Prior)
4.-LH-Marshall
5.-RH-Marquis
Posted by: dan1648 | November 13, 2007 at 04:05 PM
while we are dreaming, why not trade hill/cedeno/some combination not named marmol or soto (fontenot, hart, gallagher, theriot) for crawford, sign fukadome and then make a deal centerd around pie with the twins for johann santana then u have the best one two pirching in the nl and one of the best lineups
Posted by: yort918 | November 13, 2007 at 04:06 PM
I'm embarrassed to be a Cubs fan after that post...
We could move Soto and Marmol although I'd hate to move Soto. Marmol though is expendable. Yes... he's good. So is Crawford though and an outfield of Crawford Pie and Soriano would be great defensively.
Our bullpen has Wuertz, Howry, and in all likelihood Kerry Wood, all of whom are pretty good. Batters will catch up to Marmol next year, he is one of my favorite players but again if he were the centerpiece of a deal for Crawford, it would be worth it.
Giving up Soto and Marmol would be too much. Maybe Crawford is worth that, but the Cubs can't spare it and really, that's okay.
Marmol, Marshall, Cedeno would be worth it. Anything more and the Cubs are better off with Crawford. After all, we do love Pie right?
Posted by: RandomScrub | November 13, 2007 at 04:08 PM
*without Crawford in that last paragraph
Posted by: RandomScrub | November 13, 2007 at 04:09 PM
These deals are just too much for me to handle. Unbelievably delusional.
First stop mentioning Marquis. He's horrible with a terrible contract. Why don't you just trade him to the Rockies for Tulo, or to the Brewers for Braun. Sounds good? How about a no hit CF prospect for Peavy?
Realistically, Crawford is awesome and would be tough to get for the Cubbies.
Hill is fine and Pie is OK, but the Cubs will be best off trying to trade for Kazmir. Break the bank. Hill, Pie, and somebody else and you MIGHT be able to think about it. I just don't see the Cubs being able to pull off a deal for any quality young players like Kazmir, Crawford, etc.
Posted by: CTScott | November 13, 2007 at 04:20 PM
WTF?!?
You people bitch about Yankees fans being delusional but this takes the cake.
Crawford:
Can hit in any of the top 3-4 spots in the order.
Is 25 years old.
Can play gold glove defense in any of the 3 OF spots.
Can steal 60 bases.
Hits .300+
His OBP has increased every year.
His SLG has increased every year except for this one when it stayed steady.
His OPS+ has increased every year.
He's cheap until the 2011 season when he hits FA, is an excellent teammate and good character guy.
See what the Rangers got for Tex? See what the Marlins are asking for Cabrera? Crawford will fetch something more than Tex and less than Cabrera.
Hill, Marmol and Cedeno. Please.
Rays will trade Crawford for a cheap ace. Cain, Lincecum that sort of player.
Posted by: henry14theking | November 13, 2007 at 04:28 PM
"Not only should the Cubs try for Crawford, why not add to it, and get Scott Kazmir, too. Then, they could include both Rich Hill and Mark Prior. Hill, Prior, Felix Pie, Ronny Cedeno, and someone like Jake Fox should get that done."
Why do you want to get the Rays GM fired?
Posted by: CarpeDiem | November 13, 2007 at 04:32 PM
Cubs fans defiantly seem to always put up the most far-fetched trade proposals
Posted by: illegalblues | November 13, 2007 at 04:43 PM
I have to say...I'm pretty embarrassed to be a Cubs fan as well.
Here is the deal people. Hendry SHOULD look into this, SHOULD offer anyone not named Hill, Marmol, or Soto. If it can't get done (which it won't) than no deal. Sign Fukudome even if you have to throw 2 mil more than anyone else, and start Pie in Center. Use those other prospects to try and see if you can get better depth at SS...if not, make Theriot and Cedeno fight it out for a job. Bottom line...if you can get Crawford without giving up one of your MLB young prospects, do it. When you find out you can't...just sign Fukudome and be done with it.
Posted by: Aduncaroo | November 13, 2007 at 04:44 PM
These deals are just too much for me to handle. Unbelievably delusional.
First, stop mentioning Marquis. He's horrible with a terrible contract. Why don't you just trade him to the Rockies for Tulo, or to the Brewers for Braun. Sounds good?
Realistically, Crawford is a very good OF and would be tough to get for the Cubbies. Pie doesn't have as much value for the Rays than most, so I just don't see a fit.
Posted by: CTScott | November 13, 2007 at 04:44 PM
There are so many asinine, unrealistic trade posts by Cubs fans. Carl Crawford is a top 10-15 position player signed for cheap for I believe two more years. Any trade possibility will will include top-tier prospects and impact major league players. People like Marshall, Fox, and Cedeno will be the third or fourth "throw-in" players.
At least Jones is off the Cubs now, that way we don't need to hear Cubs fans include him as an integral part of every trade gonig forward.
I am a Cubs fan, but these posts need to stop.
Posted by: mmontice | November 13, 2007 at 04:45 PM
I love this website.
Posted by: nic | November 13, 2007 at 04:49 PM
And for the record people...there might be delusional Cubs fans out there...obviously, there is TONS of proof in this thread. But please don't tell me people are starting to catch up to Marmol because he relies on his slider. So does K-Rod. Marmol has that kind of slider....its ridiculous. He was literally the best reliever in the GAME last year...so please don't act like he isn't worth much...he has like 1.5 years of service time!!! Not saying he is as valuable as Crawford straight up...but last year, he probably honestly was. The only thing that hurt him is that he wasn't with the club the whole year.
Posted by: Aduncaroo | November 13, 2007 at 04:49 PM
@nic:
I'd love this website too if it weren't for the god awful commenting system.
Really Tim... please fix it. Have a look at Disqus.
Posted by: henry14theking | November 13, 2007 at 04:51 PM
The best is the one where the Rays give up Crawford, Kazmir and B.J. Upton for Hill, Cedeno, Hart and 2 top 15 prospects from O's. What a steal!
Posted by: cascando | November 13, 2007 at 04:53 PM
I'm a Cubs fan, and even I agree a lot of these proposals are unrealistic. Crawford is a young stud and would cost a ton. See I don't think he would cost as much as Teixeira or Cabrera would. Those guys are middle of the order forces, and posted high numbers in every category that didnt relate to speed. Crawford on the other hand is an above average outfielder that will post a 315/365/480 line with 20 hr and 60 sb on a good season, and that makes him a star, but not on Cabrera's level. He would require a top prosect, at least one, but Felix Pie really doesn't have much valie to Tampa because they already have Upton in CF, and D. Young, Baldelli and others to play the corners. It would likely have to be a deal surrounding around pitching. If I were the Cubs I would be determined to get this deal done without Rich Hill, who is a bonafide 3 starter starting next year, and Carlos Marmol, the Cubs' closer for the next 10 years. Even though those seem like the exact players the Rays would want, I think the Cubs could still get this done. They would have to offer the Rays a lot of depth, and no Marquis: he sucks and he's expensive. Offer the Rays Sean Marshall, Ronny Cedeno, Eric Patterson, Kevin Hart and Sam Fuld. Thats two talented young pitchers and three talented young position players. Odds are that at least a couple of those guys will end up as above average starters. Patterson and/or Cedeno could probably start immediately for the Rays, and Marshall, and maybe Hart, would likely join Kazmir, Shields, Sonnastine and Edwin Jackson in the rotation.
Posted by: scribbletone | November 13, 2007 at 04:54 PM
Yeah..that one might take the cake....but there is definitely come fierce competition if you read the whole thing!
Posted by: Aduncaroo | November 13, 2007 at 04:54 PM
"Offer the Rays Sean Marshall, Ronny Cedeno, Eric Patterson, Kevin Hart and Sam Fuld."
You had us believing that you weren't one of the delusional ones there for a second!!!
Posted by: Aduncaroo | November 13, 2007 at 04:56 PM
and also, rbCubsFan4life, your trade prosposal is embarassing. You should get kicked in the shin for typing such poppycock
Posted by: scribbletone | November 13, 2007 at 04:58 PM
Really? I thought that was five good to decent prospects for Crawford. Seemed reasonable, but i guess not.
Posted by: scribbletone | November 13, 2007 at 05:01 PM
At least I didnt propose a Pie for Cain trade..
Posted by: scribbletone | November 13, 2007 at 05:02 PM
5 to 1 offers are RARELY ever equal value for both sides
usually the team offering 5 players is getting a steal
Posted by: GoBoSox420 | November 13, 2007 at 05:06 PM
Scribbletone:
Is Hill a #3 in the NL Central or the AL East?
The Rays need an ace and a closer. Marmol fits the second I suppose, but Hill doesn't fit the first.
They need someone along with Kazmir, Shields and Price to compete with the Yanks and Sox.
Also, Baldelli and Dukes are pretty much worthless compared to Crawford.
If anything, TB should trade both Baldelli and Dukes for arms and go with a hitting core of Crawford, Upton, Young and Longoria.
Crawford > Tex in trade value right now. He's cheaper for longer. Tex is arguably the more valuable hitter.
Posted by: henry14theking | November 13, 2007 at 05:07 PM
I tried to find 5 guys that I thought had a chance to be pretty good players, but I guess the main flaw is none of those guys really looks like they could be anything more than that. Only problem though is the only young guys the Cubs have like that are like Pie, Gallagher, Marmol, Veal and Vitters. The only one i could see them moving in a deal like this is Gallagher though, and maybe Marmol
Posted by: scribbletone | November 13, 2007 at 05:08 PM
I can't tell if these trades are for Crawford or Baldelli.
Posted by: kab21 | November 13, 2007 at 05:09 PM
Crawford > Tex in trade value right now. He's cheaper for longer. Tex is arguably the more valuable hitter.
Do you really think that the Rays could get 5 good propects, including the best 3 that an organization has to offer?
(a la Teixeira for Salty, Andrus, Harrison and others)
Posted by: scribbletone | November 13, 2007 at 05:10 PM
In the trading environment you don't really care about he amount of good to decent prospects. If you're trading a star player with a reasonable contract, you're going to want star potential returned to you. I don't even know if Rich Hill is honestly good enough to be in this discussion.
Posted by: illegalblues | November 13, 2007 at 05:11 PM
Here's the fact of the matter when it comes to this deal. Unless the D-Rays are willing to take some decent prospects who are not ready for the big leagues this year, but will be in a year or two, this deal doesn't go down. Marmol will not be traded, they're prepping him to take over the closer spot in '09. After the revolving door of catchers we had last year, Soto will also not be going anywhere. People need to stop mentioning Prior. He's not even going to be ready to pitch again until late this season, if at all. I'd hate to see Hill go, but the Cubs could handle his departure, although he's young and cheap and we all love his curve. If the Cubs are planning on nabbing Crawford and Fukudome, then Pie has to go somewhere because the Cubs won't want him rotting away on the bench or in the minors for 3-4 years.
I don't see this trade happening unless Hendry has stopped caring about the Cubs and his job, or the D-Rays are willing to take some down-the-road prospects. The last option is mildly realistic considering there is no way in hell that they actually are going to be contenders for a few years, after Crawford nears free agency anyways and heads somewhere with a payroll over $30 million. It's really going to come down to whether they want trade him now or in his FA year.
Posted by: Cynic81 | November 13, 2007 at 05:20 PM
Uhh Cynic:
The Rays are a lot closer than you think. Their hitting is squared away.
They're good enough defensively.
Pitching: they already have Kazmir and Shields. Price and McGee are ready. Neimann is there.
Get them a bullpen and in a year they'll challenge the Yanks and Sox.
Posted by: henry14theking | November 13, 2007 at 05:38 PM
Alright well I've seen about enough of these rediculous trade offers. As a writer for the rays magazine, I feel the need to jump in here.
First off, the Rays will not accept a package of prospects. They have been very up front in saying that they want major league talent for major league talent in any trade. They already have the best farm system in baseball, why trade for any more prospects? Their minor league system is stacked, especially in starting pitching and outfielders, and they have obvious holes to fill on the major league roster. They will not, and I repeat, will not center any trade around any prospects, especially ones mentioned that would fall way down the depth chart. Price, Davis, McGee and Niemann are all BA top 100 prospects and should all be up by 08 or 09.
Here is how I see it going down. Marmol is involved no matter what. The Rays relief pitching is by far the biggest weakness and I can't see the Rays not getting Marmol in this deal.
Secondly, they would demand either Hill or Soto in the deal, with Soto being the perferred player.
Marmol and Hill/Soto seems like a lot from the Cubs perspective, but I GUARANTEE this is what they would demand. If the Cubs aren't willing to give in, then the Rays know 20+ organizations that would be willing to part with such a package for a 26 year old 2-time allstar with 3 years left on his contract.
Please, Please stop throwing names like Cedeno, Gallager, Marshall, Patterson, Pie, and Marquis around. Im not saying those players are bad (well Marquis is), but they would not interest the Rays at all. We already have better internal options and Cedeno would only be a throw in.
As I mentioned before, I do not see it happening without Marmol and I would be completely shocked if Soto or Hill was not part of the deal. I wouldnt even be suprised if the Rays asked for all three, trying to offer something else in the deal to get it done.
So start all of your trade proposals with Marmol and leave your prospects out.
Posted by: delmonmvp | November 13, 2007 at 05:51 PM
i've been waiting for someone else to notice how good the rays are. thank you king henry for realizing what espn analysis and armchair gm's havent. want to join my fantasy baseball league?
Posted by: nic | November 13, 2007 at 05:52 PM
Well, this deal would leave the cubs pitching staff in trouble. The cubs need Marmol because, in my view, he is one of the best middle relivers in the league. We need more relievers, not less. trade off excess defensive players, and go for free agents. trading for these guys is good, but we need to go for more free agents. it would make a very strong email, so lets hope...
Posted by: bronxie | November 13, 2007 at 05:53 PM
delmon MVP is invited too
Posted by: nic | November 13, 2007 at 05:54 PM
Can I get an Amen from the choir for delmonmvp?! Amen!
Posted by: Something Profound | November 13, 2007 at 05:55 PM
Allright Cubs fans, here's the deal. Carl Crawford is a very valuable OFer, young, and signed for cheap. There would also be a huge media backlash if he were traded. Consequently, the Rays won't trade him unless they get a very good deal.
A very good deal to the Rays does not include Felix Pie, they have Upton, Young, Gomes, Ruggiano on the 40-man roster right now, with Baldelli and Snelling holding down the DH spots, and Fernando Perez and Jason Pridie who are going to start the year in AAA. Only Upton and Young are better than Pie, but the rest are good as well. So Pie has some value to the Rays, but very little compared to other teams.
Hill is a #2 in the NL Central, if he were in the AL East, he's probably a passable #3, which would benefit the Rays, and is a good upgrade. Also, once Price/McGee/Davis are ready, he will be a nice trading chip, though I wouldn't be surprised to see him flipped by the Rays if they did acquire him in a trade.
Marmol is one player who does have a lot of value to the Rays. He is a shutdown closer, and the bullpen is the Rays weakest point, in terms of talent and depth.
Soto is kind of in the same boat as guys like Hill. He is a good player, but I think the Rays really like Navarro, plus they have a young, cheap, defensive-minded backup in Riggans, and John Jaso who will start in AAA next year.
Guys like Gallagher and Marshall are absolutely worthless to the Rays. Jason Hammel, Jeff Niemann, Andy Sonnanstine, and Edwin Jackson are all better. Gallagher and Marshall add nothing to the Rays.
The only positions the Rays are looking for help at is SS, where a guy like Cedeno could be nice, but he's nothing special, and a defensive-minded backup catcher who can stay healthy.
So, the Rays won't give up Crawford unless they get Hill and Marmol, without both, it doesn't happen. You can say all day how that hurts the Cubs more than acquiring Crawford would help, but that doesn't matter to Andrew Friedman, he's trying to make his team better, and if he trades Crawford, he has to be a clear winner.
Posted by: raysrule07 | November 13, 2007 at 06:06 PM
haha thanks. I just know the rays system very well and I know what they are looking for. The Rays are going to ask the moon for Crawford and I guarantee someone is going to give in. In the same sense, someone is going to pay A-rod 35 million a year. Is he really worth that? Probably not. Personally Id rather have three 10 million dollar players. In the same sense, someone is going to give the Rays what they demand for Crawford. Its way to early in the offseason for the Rays to give in to the first offer they get for Crawford. I bet almost every team has been kicking the tires on what it would take. Marmol and Soto/Hill is just being realistic.
Posted by: delmonmvp | November 13, 2007 at 06:06 PM
This would be the type of deal Hendry would make. If they had a better farm system or a deep rotation, of course I'd make the move, but you can't make moves like this and, as Tim said, create holes elsewhere. Big holes. This would cripple the pitching staff. Crawford has a lifetime .331 OBP and not much power.
Posted by: Teetz | November 13, 2007 at 06:13 PM
raysrule07, if those are the terms, then Hendry has to walk away. The Cubs are stronger not making that deal.
Posted by: cachhubguy | November 13, 2007 at 06:18 PM
Pretty much any trade Cubs fans would be in favor of, is a trade Tampa would never even consider. If any team trades for Crawford (which I would hate), they would have to OVERPAY. Stop trying to think of what you consider equal value. The Rays would not trade the face of the francize for anything close to equal value. If Crawford gets traded, it would seem so one-sided that fans would want to burn down the stadium and assasinate the GM.
Tex and Cabrera were traded/are going to be traded because they are approaching free agency and are going to demand a ton of money, that their respective teams are not willing to pay. Even with the team who trades for them knowing very well that they are going to have to pay out the ass to keep them in a year, they still have to give up a lot in the trade.
3 years of Crawford will easily net more in a trade than 1 1/3 years of Tex. In the same sense, I could see Crawford possibly netting about the same as 2 years of Cabrera.
Posted by: delmonmvp | November 13, 2007 at 06:22 PM
Thinking more about it...as good as Marmol is, I think he is at absolute peak value. When looking at his contract and talent...he is probably the most valuable in the game. Honestly...is there anyone better for cheaper for longer??
That being said...Hill and Soto are untouchable to me. Trading either creates a hole that they cannot fill this offseason. So if a deal can be done with Marmol + 2 "good" prospects, fine..think about it. Otherwise, there is just no way the deal gets done. It doesn't have to happen Cubs fans. I don't know about you...but if we can get Fukudome...I would be MORE than happy to have an outfield of Sori, Pie, and Fukudome!!! Then we can take a look at SS and still have a somewhat decent farm system.
Posted by: Aduncaroo | November 13, 2007 at 06:23 PM
I personally don't think the Cubs are deep enough to trade for Crawford and would be better off shelling out the money for someone like Fukedome. The Cubs could give the Rays what they want, Marmol and Soto/Hill, but as some of you have mentioned, it would create more holes. Of course the Rays could flip Navarro and maybe a starting pitcher such as Howell back to the Cubs to help, but that would further require more from the Cubs, possibly prospects.
Posted by: delmonmvp | November 13, 2007 at 06:25 PM
By the way delmonmvp...how about a job?? Ha...
Posted by: Aduncaroo | November 13, 2007 at 06:30 PM
Crawford is a goog player and, as a Cubs fan, I'm not saying the Rays can't get, nor shouldn't try to get a value as good as Hill+Marmol+Etc; however, for the Cubs, it's an awful move for the wrong type of player. Just get Fukudome and don't turn a strength into a huge weakness. Fukudome is ideal for what this team needs.
Hendry is an idiot so I wouldn't put anything past him. This move would only make me believe they are serious about having Dempster in the rotation, which would be a joke.
Zambrano
Lilly
Marquis
Marshall
Dempster
I wouldn't project any of those guys to have an ERA under 4 and at least two of them will be in the 5's.
Bullpen?
Ohman
Eyre
Wuertz
Hart
Howry
Wood?
Just awful....awful
Posted by: Teetz | November 13, 2007 at 06:32 PM
Crawford actually has good power, but just needs to have more confidence pulling the ball. He goes through stretches when his conidence builds and he can jack 5 homers in a 2 week span. Other times he gets slap happy and won't hit a homer for a couple weeks. As he matures as a hitter, his power numbers will increase. He has the build, 6'2 220lb, to hit for power, but right now its his approach at the plate that is limiting his potential. Most experts see Crawford as an annual .300+ BA and 20+ HR hitter for the majority of his career, and at 26 with almost 1,000 career base hits already, he has a lot to look forward to. As should any team who trades for him, as his often considered the most exciting player in baseball. He is truely one of the players you have to see play, day in and day out, to appreciate the intrinsic qualaties he possesses. Some people actually predict that he could develope into a 30-35 HR hitter some day, ala Carlos Beltran.
Posted by: delmonmvp | November 13, 2007 at 06:34 PM
haha no job for me yet. Still in grad school.
Posted by: delmonmvp | November 13, 2007 at 06:36 PM