![]() |
|
|
| |
« Beckham A Top Two Lock? | Main | The Left Fielder Market »
THURSDAY: MLB.com's Marty Noble says the Mets have already discussed Hatteberg internally. They could move quickly to sign him after he clears waivers, but Marlon Anderson's injury is a factor here.
Additionally, the Mariners are "actively pursuing" Hatteberg. The Ms actually started Miguel Cairo at first last night.
WEDNESDAY: According to Ken Davidoff of Newsday, "the Mets have some, but only some" interest in recently-designated first baseman Scott Hatteberg. Davidoff says the Mets will wait until Hatteberg clears waivers and then perhaps see if Hatteberg is open to a minor league deal.
Hatteberg is a left-handed hitter who succeeds against righties (as is often the case). Carlos Delgado hasn't succeeded against anyone this year, but previously he had the same splits as Hatteberg. The two don't match up for a platoon, but it'd make sense for the Mets to keep Hatteberg at Triple A until they decide whether to cut Delgado (.215/.294/.387 in 204 PAs).
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e200e552a106a68834
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Mets, Mariners Interested In Hatteberg:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
Scott Hatteberg? Why don't they just call up Valentino Pascucci already?
Posted by: John Peterson | May 28, 2008 at 01:32 PM
Hatteberg are almost as different as two hitters could ever be. So its not like they already have a Scott Hatteberg type in Pascucci. Fernando Tatis is the same low average with some nice pop kind of player as Pascucci is. I for one wouldn't mind having a light power high average/OBP guy at 1B batting 7th. They dont need power everywhere, they have enough pop in the OF (when healthy) to make up for not much pop, although Hatteberg and Evans could probably hit 15-20 bombs between the two of them, with a 285 ish average and a nice OBP, instead of Delgado going up and strading runners and missing pitches by an entire foot on a lot of cases. There is something to be said about having a couple of veteran role players on your team that just know how to play the game.
Posted by: nrmax88 | May 28, 2008 at 03:10 PM
Should say Pascucci and Hatteberg are as different as can be*
Posted by: nrmax88 | May 28, 2008 at 03:10 PM
Hahaha, hey Mess ~ step away from the Hattenberg… News flash, he aint gonna help. You really need to try to start fixing the problem instead of tinkering with the 25th man… Untalented youngsters from the minors and other teams tablescraps wont turn your season around though. I suggest you stop trying to get by, and start trying to actually win…
Posted by: darkstar1661 | May 29, 2008 at 01:37 PM
Hatteberg would absolutely help. Getting a .280/.350 line would be a big boost over Delgado's completely negative value to this team. A guy that could play a decent 1B, and put the ball in play would help more then you know. For one thing, Hatteberg is not the rally killer smack in the middle of a lineup that Delgado is. It sounds silly, but the all of the Mets problems seem to come from lack of fundamentals, moving runners over, loading the bases with 1 out and not being able to score. So much of this is Delgado's fault as he almost never has a productive at bat. If Delgado was capable of just hitting a flyball or a groundball to secondbase when the Mets needed one they could have about 3-4 more wins because of him alone. But he constantly kills rallies by popping up and striking out in big spots.
Posted by: nrmax88 | May 29, 2008 at 01:46 PM
“Hatteberg would absolutely help. Getting a .280/.350 line would be a big boost over Delgado's completely negative value to this team.”
…The guys hitting .173/.262/.231 ~ you really think its safer to rely on the 38YO to jumpstart his season instead of making a move in the obviously correct direction instead?
Posted by: darkstar1661 | May 29, 2008 at 02:18 PM
I know dark, but look at his platoon splits the last 2 years. And also, I am not sure what the obviously correct direction is. Leave Delgado to struggle this way all season? Having Hatteberg be able to hit .280/.350/.425 in a platoon split from the 7th spot in the order would really help this team a lot. I know I say this everyday, and it sounds like I am a broken record, but the Mets are a horrible fundamental team so far this year, and Delgado cannot be trusted in a big spot. A guy that can consistently put the ball in play would be very welcome right now. Its not like I love Hatteberg so much, its just that he is a smart veteran presence and he can help this team out a lot with certain situations. The Mets have to have a gameplan when they go up. If there were a better option, I would be fine with that, but they need to find a guy that can atleast have a solid average/obp at 1st base. A lineup of
Reyes
Castillo
Wright
Beltran
Church
Alou
Hatteberg/Tatis
Castro/Schneider looks pretty good to me.
Right now, they just have a soft offense without Church and Alou, but even once they get back, it will be hard to deal with Delgado's automatic outs everytime he has an RBI spot.
Posted by: nrmax88 | May 29, 2008 at 02:28 PM
…So because of a lack-luster offense at 1B, you propose taking the vs-RH Hatteberg and the vs-LH Delgado and making a platoon player who hits:
.190 / .286 / .262 / .548 ~ Hatteberg vs RH
.200 / .235 / .369 / .605 ~ Delgado vs LH
…Congratulations ~ you managed to somehow lose production from the 1B spot…
See, as bad as Delgado has been, he’s actually hitting .224/.328/.397/.725 vs RH ~ that’s nearly 200 OPS and 50 OBP points above what Scott has been able to manage against righties. If the team insists on using Delgado, then they need to bring a RH platoon hitter for him to take those LH bats away from Carlos. Hoping that 38YO Hatteberg can somehow manage to hit better against Righties while limiting Delgado to his weaker split is just silly in my mind though…
Posted by: darkstar1661 | May 29, 2008 at 04:26 PM
When did I ever say anything about Delgado being the other half of the platoon? If they are going to keep Delgado, then obviously Hatteberg is useless. I thought you would realize this. But pair Hatteberg and Tatis/Pascucci at 1B and you get much more production then Delgado has given you. Easily.
And stop using Hattebergs 53 AB sample size this year. Thats the kind of stupid crap you call other people out for. Hatteberg was .323/.411/.491 in 375 PA last year vs RHP. In 2006, he was .302/.401/.450 in 450 PA against righties. So he is a fine half of a platoon. Especially from a team that generates offense from pretty much everywhere on the diamond when they are at full strength. A guy like Tatis or Pasucci platooning with him would add in the pop that Hatteberg lacks, and make for a fine 7 spot platoon in the lineup.
And somehow I still think that you knew I wasn't proposing having Delgado be the other half of the platoon.
Posted by: nrmax88 | May 29, 2008 at 05:24 PM
And I still want to know what this obvious direction is. How would you go about getting production out of the 1B spot in the Mets current situation?
Posted by: nrmax88 | May 29, 2008 at 05:26 PM
“When did I ever say anything about Delgado being the other half of the platoon?”
…Oh, my bad ~ didn’t realize he was bumped in favor of Tatis in your lineup ~ I don’t generally pay attention to those things because we so many of the Cubs lineups that go something like “Beltran / Utley / Pujols / Lee / ARam / Fukudome / Soriano / Soto…” etc. Know what I mean?
Anyway, yeah if ya dump Delgado then… But if you do that, then you are relying on the 38YO to somehow turn around his season and produce semi-respectable numbers ~ why not hope the younger with a better track-record Delgado turns it around instead? You say I shouldn’t look at small sample sizes, but what else do we have to go on when we are talking about 38 YOs? The age indicates its probably not safe to rely on his past performance, meaning we either take what we have of rely on a prayer… And why look at the small sample size of Delgado then? I mean, he slumped to start last year too, and ended up hitting .285/.375/.469 in the second half…
As far as what they should do with 1B as a whole? Unfortunately, ya kind of have to wait it out with Delgado ~ but in the meantime they should bring in a RHer to platoon with, and ideally light a fire under, Delgado’s @ss… And in the meantime you also have to keep his @ss in the 7 hole ~ when he was demoted to that spot it’s the only time he looked alive… But instead he keeps seeing his name moving up the lineup… And giving him a day off once in a blue-moon to play 40-something light-hitting Easley or stop-gap Anderson isnt going to put fright into him, or provide better results at the plate. I agree with benching him for the last couple games and maybe that works, but playing him daily in the 7-8 spots is better for the team and possibly more degrading to him if this benching doesn’t work…
Posted by: darkstar1661 | May 29, 2008 at 08:26 PM
As a reds fan I can tell you that Hattie will help any team that he will get regular playing time with. He was the only red to hit over 300 last year. With the emergance of Votto Hattie had no where to play. He started maybe once a week if he was lucky. Most of his abs this year are pinch hit abs. He is not a pinch hitter and will not do well in that roll but in a platoon situation when he can play 3 times a week or more he will be a fine adition. The only reason the reds dfad him was beceuse even in a platoon with Votto it didnt make much sense they are both lefties. They called up Andy Phillips to replace him a right handed 1st baseman who can also play 3rd and the outfield. Just wasnt a good fit for the reds anymore.
Posted by: gothambats | May 30, 2008 at 07:06 AM