![]() |
|
|
| |
« Odds And Ends: Beckham, Rangers, Peterson, Drew | Main | Rosenthal's Latest: Teixeira, Liriano, Garcia, Willingham »
It certainly doesn't sound like the Blue Jays will be going after Adam Dunn while J.P. Ricciardi is at the helm. Check out this interview Ricciardi did with Mike Wilner of The Fan 590.
First a fan calls up and asks Ricciardi whether the Jays have interest in Dunn. Ricciardi replies that he's not interested in Dunn. Then he says:
"Maybe we have more information and know the player a little more than the average fan."
Interesting. Another fan calls up and says he's surprised Ricciardi would be so quick to dismiss a power bat like Dunn. Ricciardi really goes off on Dunn this time:
"He's a lifetime .230-.240 hitter that strikes out a ton and hits home runs.
Did you know the guy doesn't really like baseball that much? Did you know the guy doesn't have a passion to play the game that much? I don't think you'd be very happy if we brought Adam Dunn here...We've done our homework on guys like Adam Dunn and there's a reason why we don't want Adam Dunn."
C. Trent Rosecrans has Dunn's reaction here.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e200e5536000f48833
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Ricciardi Doesn't Like Dunn:


|
|
Meh, the Jays are 10 games back at almost the end of first half of the season, they have some injuries and they can't score runs. Probably will be sellers if they do anything at all at deadline, I suspect.
Posted by: zs190 | June 19, 2008 at 08:55 AM
So what's the over/under for when Ricciardi is unemployed?
Posted by: jza1218 | June 19, 2008 at 08:56 AM
damn talk about harsh
Posted by: Juggernaut | June 19, 2008 at 09:05 AM
he's a lifetime .247 hitter and has a career OPS+ of 130 you turd. In other words, he is a bigger offensive force than anyone on your team. I have never like Ricchiardi.
Posted by: gogopalehose | June 19, 2008 at 09:05 AM
Odds Adam Dunn is employed in MLB in 2009:
100%.
Odds J.P. Ricciardi is employed in MLB in 2009:
WAY less than that.
Enough said.
Posted by: cromesbl | June 19, 2008 at 09:07 AM
I've heard Dunn on Houston sports radio talking football... Of course, any Texan sports fan is probably a big football fan, so that might not be say anything.
Posted by: jatorres | June 19, 2008 at 09:14 AM
I'm not big on Dunn, and I'm glad the Jays won't be pursuing him. I heard an announcer recently talk about how Dunn doesn't do any work outs (perhaps what Ricciardi was eluding to with his comment about Dunn not being so much into baseball.) If I were at the helm, I'd want to know that all my guys were working their arses off to be at their best for the team. Dunn sounds like a bit of a slacker. That's the last thing the Jays need.
Posted by: baseballfiles | June 19, 2008 at 09:18 AM
wow that is harsh. but honestly, i dont care one ounce whether or not Dunn has a "passion" for the game. he hits the tar outta the ball and has done so as consistently as anyone over the past 5 years. and he's played 150+ games every year. whether he "likes" doing it not, he does it. and he does it well.
Posted by: charliescrabbles | June 19, 2008 at 09:19 AM
I've never been a huge Adam Dunn fan (too much the one dimensional player for my taste) but what kind of moron publicly tears down a player on another team. Ricciardi is a certified idiot.
BTW jatorres, Dunn was a big time Texas college quarterback
Posted by: MickS | June 19, 2008 at 09:21 AM
Ricciardi is such an elitist pig. I'm not even a Reds, hate em as a matter of fact, but Dunn would be an improvement over what he has. He said the same type of thing about Jack Wilson when they needed a shortstop last year. It's no wonder he's never won anything.
Posted by: melmann | June 19, 2008 at 09:28 AM
Anyone else think that Dunn will eventually fall off like Sexson did? Both big power hitters in their prime with a ton of k's.
Posted by: Kramerica Industries | June 19, 2008 at 09:31 AM
Or hey, here is a wild idea, maybe JP is right. There was a story on here saying Boston wants nothing to do with him because of his strikeout rate. Is it really a surprise that some of these millionaires get bored of baseball and just do it for the money once they strike it big?
Posted by: Dev0 | June 19, 2008 at 09:35 AM
Or hey, here is a wild idea, maybe JP is right. There was a story on here saying Boston wants nothing to do with him because of his strikeout rate. Is it really a surprise that some of these millionaires get bored of baseball and just do it for the money once they strike it big?
Posted by: Dev0 | June 19, 2008 at 09:37 AM
Yeah, but how about carrying yourself like a professional and not getting riled into a tirade by some random fan on a radio show?
Posted by: aap212 | June 19, 2008 at 09:40 AM
An MLB club is a workplace. If the Jays get a reputation as a disrespectful place to work, players who have multiple suiters will shuffle Toronto to the bottom of the deck. A G.M. who starts bad-mouthing players just because he's frustrated with a fan's question needs to go find another line of work.
Posted by: MickS | June 19, 2008 at 09:53 AM
I have been defending JP for YEARS, straight up until last night's debacle. Whether or not he was right or wrong YOU DO NOT THROW ANOTHER TEAM'S PLAYER UNDER THE BUS. That he is completely wrong and that player look tremendous in the middle of the Jays lineup is irrelevant. Fire Ricciardi.
Posted by: 92-93 | June 19, 2008 at 09:58 AM
"Odds Adam Dunn is employed in MLB in 2009: 100%.
Odds J.P. Ricciardi is employed in MLB in 2009:WAY less than that."
While true there's this statement as well:
Odds Adam Dunn is overpaid in 2009: 100%
Odds J.P. Ricciardi is overpaid 2009: WAY less than that.
Let's face it, next year someone will offer Dunn a bloat contract, probably 5+ years for minimum 16M a year. Riccardi has a good point, he either hits a homer or strikes out. While a dangerous bat in the lineup, it's not one to count on.
Posted by: start_wearing_purple | June 19, 2008 at 09:58 AM
This is why the Blue Jay with the highest slugging percentage is Rod Barajas.
Posted by: jc2125 | June 19, 2008 at 10:05 AM
"He either hits a homer or strikes out."
Adam Dunn's walks and NL Rank
2002 NL-128-3
2004 NL-108-6
2005 NL-114-3
2006 NL-112-2
2007 NL-101-5
2008 NL-60-1
Posted by: stellar | June 19, 2008 at 10:07 AM
This isn't the first time, Dunn's desire/passion has been questioned. A few years back the Houston media was reporting that the Astros front office didn't have interest in Dunn because of questionable intagiables. I believe it was said that he was rather unfocused in the field and wasn't much of a worker.
Of course this was when Tim Purpura was in charge......
Posted by: Darin | June 19, 2008 at 10:20 AM
I agree with his comments and I agree with Boston's reason for not wanting him. That being said, a leader of an organization should never talk about someone elses employee like that.
If a project manager at my office said similar statements about another PM's team member, his career at our facility would be over. You just can't say that, even if its true AND everyone knows it.
Posted by: ASGAppearance | June 19, 2008 at 10:20 AM
An out is an out is an out.
Depending on the situation, a strikeout is more or less costly than a non-strikeout. I know I'd rather a K than a double play grounder. I'd also rather a grounder to the right than a K with a man on 3rd and 0-1 out.
Adam Dunn works the count, which leads to his walk and strikeout totals. He also -mashes- the ball.
I'd take him. If Matsui goes down, I'd love the Yankees to pull an Abreu style Dunn deal ;-)
Posted by: V | June 19, 2008 at 10:26 AM
“Let's face it, next year someone will offer Dunn a bloat contract, probably 5+ years for minimum 16M a year.”
…yep, because who wants to have a 28YO who is basically a guarantee to be on base 38+% of the time, provide a 900+ OPS, and drive in & score a Hundred for your club. But hey, he doesn’t hold a high BA and it was proven back in the 1800s that BA is the most important stat to look at for hitters… ***sigh***
BTW:
“Odds Adam Dunn is overpaid in 2009: 100%
Odds J.P. Ricciardi is overpaid 2009: WAY less than that.”
…if Riccardi is employed, it is a 100% chance he is being overpaid…
As far as Riccardi goes ~ humm, so we should think that Dunn isnt a very good hitter because the guy who has built one of the bottom-3 offenses in baseball (while playing in a hitters park!) told it to us? Really? How does that one compute?
Obviously Riccardi has a difficult time realizing what production his, his team results reflect it…
Posted by: darkstar1661 | June 19, 2008 at 10:27 AM
Dunn apparently doesn't like people talking trash:
http://www.thelotd.com/ctrent/blog/2008/06/19/dunn_i_dont_know_the_clown
Posted by: Bank Street Grounds | June 19, 2008 at 10:28 AM
I'd be happy with a guy with a career .382 OB% and .900 OPS. Didn't he give Wells a HUGE contract? Even though Wells has a career .331 OB% and .808 OPS.
Posted by: XD23 | June 19, 2008 at 10:33 AM
thanks for that link. its hilarious. jp burns a bridge with dunn for no reason, despite the fact that he's in town next weeek, and the team could really use him.
Posted by: Guitar Hero | June 19, 2008 at 10:45 AM
If someone doesn't want Dunn for his strike out rate then he's either lying or ignorant of other things like OBP and power hitting. Juan Pierre rarely strikes out but who would you rather have in left field? Weighing strike outs that heavily for a hitter's value is just stupid. You know who else strikes out a lot? David Ortiz, Ryan Howard, Pat Burrel, BJ Upton, Miguel Cabrera. And that's just off the top of my head.
Logically, the Red Sox wouldn't want Dunn because the outfield is overloaded and 1B and DH are occupied (3B as well so you can't move Youk). Players like Dunn also don't age well either so why trade young prospects for someone who has questionable work ethic that might lose it in a couple of years? There's exceptions like Killebrew and Reggie Jackson but that's why they're Hall of Famers.
Obviously Riccardi doesn't want Dunn because he's an idiot. What kind of person calls out a player like that when all a fan wanted was an explanation?
And as for Dunn's work ethic, I wouldn't know enough to comment on it. But I do know that it requires tremendous patience and discipline to work the count like he does. Why do free swingers who refuse to improve their game get credit for being fiery and passionate while hurting their team? But players like Dunn whose patience allows them to hit 40 HRs and walk 100 times get bashed?
Posted by: Victor | June 19, 2008 at 10:50 AM
Did I mention the Jays are on pace for the most double plays ever? THey have a good OBP and a bad SLG...a power hitter who k's a lot is EXACTLY what they need.
Posted by: Guitar Hero | June 19, 2008 at 10:54 AM
"Didn't he give Wells a HUGE contract?"
Oh man I just looked this up. I added his signing bonus into '08 to '10 to reflect the yearly salaries.
7 years/$126M (2008-14)
08:$9M, 09:$10M, 10:$21M, 11:$23M, 12:$21M, 13:$21M, 14:$21M
WOW! He gets Beltran money for being slightly above average offensively and being a pretty average defensive CF. Look how back loaded that contract is. 107M over 5 years from 2011-2014! Talk about untradeable.
Posted by: Victor | June 19, 2008 at 11:00 AM
Well...I suppose he could be posturing. I'm guessing the Reds want a lot for Dunn and huge home run hitters are traditionally overrated by fans.
Isn't he a Billy Beane disciple? Wouldn't he have at least heard of OBP?
I actually think the high number of Ks can be a help in the middle of the lineup because they avoid double plays. For a guy of Dunn's size and speed he just doesn't hit into a lot of DPs. Compare him with say...David Ortiz (who hits into twice as many DPs) or Frank Thomas (who even in his prime was hitting into 20+ DPs a season) not to mention guys like Cal Ripken or Pudge etc. etc. Those guys were all big middle of the order guys who didn't have the strike out problems Dunn has but killed a lot of rallies.
I'm not saying I'd take Dunn over any of them - I'm just saying there are other lines of thinking to throw out there. Worse things can happen than Ks in baseball, especially when you are batting behind high OBP players.
Posted by: rkab | June 19, 2008 at 11:03 AM
Hahaha, wow ~ that Dunn response was great!
“I don’t know the clown. I don’t know, and you can use the word ‘clown’ if you like”
“He’s obviously won more than me, I guess. Or hasn’t. I know nothing about him.”
“The players didn’t say anything, it’s just some clown sitting in a front office pushing paper.”
“He could be in this clubhouse right now, I wouldn’t know. I couldn’t tell you his name, what he looks like – he’s got a big mouth, that’s all I know about him.”
…Dunn, with those comments, moved up about 50 notches in my book…
“Well...I suppose he could be posturing. I'm guessing the Reds want a lot for Dunn and huge home run hitters are traditionally overrated by fans.”
…interesting way of going about that though, dont ya think?
Posted by: darkstar1661 | June 19, 2008 at 11:13 AM
I have just lost all respect for JP.
Posted by: ballerwhiteboy | June 19, 2008 at 11:37 AM
Seriously, its like he wants to get fired on purpose and knows something so ignorant like this is the first step out of a job.
I guess we can officially add Dunn to the group of JD Drew and Pat Burrell called "Players who hate being awesome players".
Posted by: Athletic Domination | June 19, 2008 at 12:24 PM
Career OPS+:
LF Shannon Stewart: 106
RF Alexis Rios: 103
DH Matt Stairs: 119
1B Lyle Overbay: 110
Adam Dunn who can play all of these positions: 130.
I don't care if he strikes out 150+ times a season, if he's getting on base (even if it is by walks) at a .360ish clip and slugging upwards of .500.
Posted by: Cody | June 19, 2008 at 01:03 PM
I'm not saying JP is wrong or right. I'm saying I would not want to tell that to Adam's face.
Posted by: studio179 | June 19, 2008 at 02:26 PM
"wow that is harsh. but honestly, i dont care one ounce whether or not Dunn has a "passion" for the game. he hits the tar outta the ball and has done so as consistently as anyone over the past 5 years. and he's played 150+ games every year"
He doesn't really "hit the tar" out of anything, other than from the HR prospective. His doubles numbers are pathetic, as are his clutch numbers. 40 HR with a .490 SLG? That is not very good at all.
"I don't care if he strikes out 150+ times a season, if he's getting on base (even if it is by walks) at a .360ish clip and slugging upwards of .500."
Um, the fact that he K's a lot and has a minuscule BA means he drives in significantly fewer runs than an otherwise similar player who makes better contact. I mean, how in the hell does a guy who hits 40 HR and plays 160 games only drive in 92 runs? His career BA with RISP? .222. 2 outs, RISP? .211.
"Adam Dunn works the count, which leads to his walk and strikeout totals."
Russell Martin works the count and doesn't strikeout a lot. Barry Bonds worked the count and didn't strike out a lot. Dunn walks a lot because pitchers pitch around him. Dunn K's a lot because he over swings and gets fooled a lot.
"BTW jatorres, Dunn was a big time Texas college quarterback"
No he wasn't. Dunn spent very little time in college and was already in rookie ball at the age of 18.
Posted by: AA | June 19, 2008 at 02:34 PM
“I mean, how in the hell does a guy who hits 40 HR and plays 160 games only drive in 92 runs?”
…Because he bats after the 3 & 4 hitters. Then we have the fact that he still manages to constantly score 100+ on bad scoring teams with the 7 to 9 hitters following (which includes the pitcher) ~ but how do you explain that one?
Anyway gee, go figure that OBP and SLG work together to provide a players actual output value, no matter where they hit in the lineup ~ who woulda thunk it, huh? Plus, it seems this new fangled way of gauging value even works on crappy teams like Dunn has been on…
Posted by: darkstar1661 | June 19, 2008 at 03:05 PM
"…Because he bats after the 3 & 4 hitters."
Really? Then how come in 2006, when he had only 92 RBI, he hit 3rd or 4th in the majority of his games?
"Anyway gee, go figure that OBP and SLG work together to provide a players actual output value, no matter where they hit in the lineup"
Except that his SLG sucks for a guy who hits so many home runs, not to mention his absolutely terrible RISP.
"Plus, it seems this new fangled way of gauging value even works on crappy teams like Dunn has been on…"
The crappy teams Dunn has played on are mostly crappy because they can't pitch. They score plenty of runs
Posted by: AA | June 19, 2008 at 04:20 PM
“Really? Then how come in 2006, when he had only 92 RBI, he hit 3rd or 4th in the majority of his games?”
…Oh, you are going to be focusing only on his one off year where his OPS+ was a much lower 115-ish instead of its normal 130-145 mark and where he was surrounded by the a revolving group of hitters in-front and behind him that make up one of the worst middle--lineups you’ll probably find? Yeah, if you can only see a players lowest point where ignoring all the dramatically better seasons around it then I’m not sure what to tell ya…
“Except that his SLG sucks for a guy who hits so many home runs, not to mention his absolutely terrible RISP.”
Please give me a list of all the players who have scored 100 R and posted 100 RBI at least even two times the last 4 years… How long do you think said list would be?
“The crappy teams Dunn has played on are mostly crappy because they can't pitch. They score plenty of runs”
…Mainly middle of the pack the last couple years, and most of that is because of how many runs he is constantly involved in.
For instance, take that 2006 off-year you were trying to harp on ~ do you realize that he still had 32 more Runs and 17 more RBI than any other Red? Really, ponder that one for a sec… 2007 saw him second in Runs (by 6) and 8 more RBI than anyone. 2005 was +9 RBI and +10 R than anyone else… 2004 was +3 R and +4 RBI…
But hey, a teams continual R and RBI leader, no matter where he hits, is obviously a bad hitter if he doesn’t have a high BA… And then once you compile that list of guys with atleast 2 100/100 seasons the last 4 years (to which Dunn has 3) we will know how he stacks up against others out there…
Posted by: darkstar1661 | June 19, 2008 at 05:19 PM
"And then once you compile that list of guys"
How about you do that? And at the same time, why don't you compile a list of batters making in excess of $13m a year who hit less than .230 with RISP and less than .215 with 2 out and RISP. Oh, and then, perhaps you should take a look at the numbers of the guys who knock Dunn in, given that he does tend to score runs.
Posted by: AA | June 19, 2008 at 06:37 PM
JP Retardi has done it again! Way to piss of Adam Dunn, a possible solution to our offensive problems has gone down the drain. If the Jays don't make the playoffs the first thing Paul Godfrey better do is fire JP. He is the worst GM in Blue Jays history. He is a stain on their franchise. Hopefully the Jays will fire him at the end of the season. GO JAYS GO!
Posted by: Jays Believer 92,93 | June 19, 2008 at 07:11 PM
“How about you do that?”
…Why? I’m not the one trying to illogically argue that a low BA means he doesnt produce runs ~ we have plenty of evidence showing otherwise. Really, it shouldn’t take long ~ only like 5-15 guys make 100/100 a year anyway so its easy to spot the repeaters…
“And at the same time, why don't you compile a list of batters making in excess of $13m a year who hit less than .230 with RISP and less than .215 with 2 out and RISP”
…again with the BA. I really wish the game would just get rid of this stat completely; everyone (well, almost everyone) knows its pretty darn close to completely pointless…
“Oh, and then, perhaps you should take a look at the numbers of the guys who knock Dunn in, given that he does tend to score runs.”
You mean guys like Scott Hattenberg, Alex Gonzalez, Javier Valentin, David Ross, Edwin Encarnacion, Austin Kearns, Rich Aurilla, Felipe Lopez, Joe Randa, all pitchers, etc? Nah, too many to list since they basically changed each and every day seeing as they were the weak 7-9 hitters… Some did good, most didn’t ~ all in all you got a rather uninspiring group of guys you are relying on to knock you in though and he still pulls off 100/100 3 of 4 years…
Posted by: darkstar1661 | June 19, 2008 at 07:18 PM