![]() |
|
|
| |
« Mark Teixeira Roundup | Main | Cubs, Hendry Standing Pat »
Adam Rubin of the New York Daily News brings us insight on the Mets' interest in acquiring an outfielder, namely Raul Ibanez, before the deadline:
"The Mets scratched a second name off their list of four primary trade targets when Cleveland dealt Casey Blake to the Dodgers yesterday, one day after Xavier Nady landed with the Yankees. Seattle's Raul Ibanez appears the most logical remaining target, since Pittsburgh seems less inclined to trade Jason Bay after having dealt Nady."
The price tag for Ibanez may be too high for the Mets, but with the Nady and Blake deals being within reason the cost of Ibanez should come down to earth.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e200e553bccf9d8833
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Mets Focus On Raul Ibanez:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
Ibanez is a horrible outfielder, isn't he? He'd be a serious offensive upgrade over the current suspects, but he may give back with the glove half of the runs he produces with the bat.
Posted by: ColonelTom | July 27, 2008 at 11:54 AM
Colonel,
Exactly. According to most metrics Ibanez gives back every run with his defense that he creates with his offense.
Posted by: csiems | July 27, 2008 at 12:01 PM
It is so stupid when people say that. Do you realize how horrible you would have to be to actually cost teams the amount of runs that people propose everyday? Is he so bad that a routine flyball is going to bounce of his clumsy face because he has no hand/eye coordination? Pat Burrell, Josh Willingham, Adam Dunn, Carlos Lee, etc all played the OF, and the Mets have been using Marlon Anderson and Fernando Tatis, so please spare me the "he will cost whatever team plays for as many runs as he will produce offensively in the field cause he stinks" crap.
Posted by: nrmax88 | July 27, 2008 at 12:01 PM
Regardless of Raul's value, however, the M's want the equivalent of two high draft picks because that is what they will get when he turns down arbitration at the end of the year. If he accepts he makes sense for the M's as a DH.
Posted by: csiems | July 27, 2008 at 12:02 PM
NRMAX, You don't know WHAT you are talking about. Raul turns his opponents' singles into doubles and triples, and pop outs into singles at an alarming rate. Watch him play sometime before spouting nonsense.
Posted by: csiems | July 27, 2008 at 12:05 PM
csiems,
nrmax is right. It drives me crazy when people assert that a productive hitter who's a below-average defender costs his team more runs than he creates.
Over his career as an OF, Ibanez has slightly fewer than 2 chances per game. And he's successfully fielded 98.5 percent of them.
He gets 4 to 5 plate appearances a game.
To "give up" as many runs as he produces, he'd have to butcher every ball hit his way. He doesn't. So get a grip, man, and join reality.
Posted by: ink-stained scribe | July 27, 2008 at 12:23 PM
Speaking of not knowing what you are talking about, Ibanez is no longer arbitration eligible. And as bad of an outfielder that he is does not trump the fact that he is a good hitter. If he really costs his team the same amount of runs that he produces, which I find very hard to believe, he wouldn't have a job as an OF, and wouldn't have trade interest from NL teams.
Posted by: Know ID yuh | July 27, 2008 at 12:25 PM
Evidently you guys don't watch too many Mariner games (completely understandable). While Raul is no gold glover, he doesn't run around with his glove dangling off his foot blindfolded.
He is a little below avg to be sure, but to insinuate that he costs his team as many runs as he produces is completely idiotic.
I love how the media, and east coast fans completely overvalue Mets/Yankees/Red Sox players and prospects, but any other teams players....who those East Coast teams are trying to secure, are crap........if they are crap why do you want them so bad? Just because the chronically stupid Pirates bend over every time another GM calls about a deal doesn't mean every team has to.
also, while Raul will be a Type A Free Agent, don't automatically assume the M's will get those two picks, I wouldn't be surprised to see him accept arbitration....which is fine by me, Raul would be an OK DH.
As to Washburn, go find another LHP....as much as I'd like to see him gone, I think he hold a little more value than is being portrayed, or teams wouldn't be pursuing him....
Posted by: Capper | July 27, 2008 at 12:29 PM
"I love how the media, and east coast fans completely overvalue Mets/Yankees/Red Sox players and prospects, but any other teams players....who those East Coast teams are trying to secure, are crap........if they are crap why do you want them so bad? Just because the chronically stupid Pirates bend over every time another GM calls about a deal doesn't mean every team has to."
Apparently, you haven't been paying attention. The National Media shits all over the Mets farm system more then any other team in the game, apparently it's the popular thing to do. They didn't have the prospects to get Johan Santana....oh wait. Now according to them the only decent prospect in the Mets system is Fernando Martinez. Mike Pelfrey? Crap. A 21 year old Lefty Starting Pitcher with a 3.04 ERA and close to a Strikeout an Inning in AA? Crap. A 23 year old 2B/3B with an .852 OPS and 13 steals in AA? Crap. I could go on and on, but you get my point, those prospects put up those lines in the Yankees or the Red Sox system and they're the second coming of _____ Hall of Famer. In the Mets system they're nothing.
The Mets aren't the Yankees or the Red Sox, they're not the media darlings, national beat writers (Buster Olney w/ Yankees, Peter Gammons w/ Red Sox, ect) don't go out of their way to kiss the Mets team and their prospects asses.
Posted by: AdropOFvenom | July 27, 2008 at 01:06 PM
Failure to understand the value of defense has put the M's in the position they are currently. Last year, according to any accurate metric we have available to measure defense, Raul's glove cost the M's 20-30 runs relative to the average left fielder and his bat earned the team about 30. Everything we know about baseball suggests age has reduced his fielding ability even further in 2008.
Subjectively guessing about Raul's defense is no substitute for evaluating the concrete results of his play. I cannot believe fielding percentage has even been referenced in this discussion.
Raul would be incredibly valuable as a DH. One could make the argument that he could succeed for at least a few more years at first base. As an outfielder, however, he is toast. He accelerates incredibly slowly and runs terrible routes.
I am sure he is a terrific human being who loves the game. As far as improving a team, however, the Mets (and the Mariners for that matter) would be better off with a AAAA bat who plays league average defense.
Posted by: csiems | July 27, 2008 at 01:28 PM
Isn't it possible that everything isn't a conspiracy, and that the Mets farm system is worse? Reyes and D Wright cant be considered prospects anymore and the Mets lost some talent in the Santana deal, and now the only top prospect remaining is Martinez (Don't tell me Niese is a top prospect. I know he is their 2nd best guy but he is not a top prospect in baseball).
Posted by: themfightnwords | July 27, 2008 at 01:49 PM
The Mets would be able to take Ibanez out when they have a lead and put Chavez in who plays phenomenal defense. Beltran also covers enough ground to get some of those in the gap hits.
Posted by: metsfan | July 27, 2008 at 01:53 PM
"Speaking of not knowing what you are talking about, Ibanez is no longer arbitration eligible."
Err, you should talk...csie ms was talking about free agent salary arbitration, when a player is a free agent and is offered arbitration by his old team. If he declines and signs with a new team, the old team receives draft pick compensation.
You were probably thinking of arbitration for players with between 3 and 6 years MLB service time(and some players with between 2 and 3 years as well). Totally different kind of arbitration, No Duh.
Whoops, that's Know ID yuh. ;)
Posted by: StarryEyed | July 27, 2008 at 02:25 PM
Know ID yuh, Raul is a near lock to become a Type A free agent according to the Elias rankings at the end of this year. If he rejects an offer of arbitration by the Mariners in order to sign with another team, the Mariners will be given two high draft picks. If the signing team finishes in the top half of the standings it will be a 16-30 first round pick. Otherwise it will be a 1-15 second round pick. In addition they will receive a supplemental pick between the first and second rounds. In this instance I know exactly what I am talking about.
That the Mariners have allowed one of the worst defensive players in the game to play in the outfield is one of several reasons they have the third worst record in MLB despite a top ten payroll.
Just because a national league team is interested in Raul's services does not prove he is a decent fielder. They may see him purely as a bench hitter, or someone who can spell Delgado at first base. Perhaps they believe he can be obtained for salary relief and a low level prospect, so he is worth investigating. You and I have no way of knowing.
Posted by: csiems | July 27, 2008 at 02:40 PM
I spend 20 minutes composing my thoughts and starryeyed beats me to it.
Posted by: csiems | July 27, 2008 at 02:42 PM