MLB Rumors - MLB Trade Rumors
Subscribe to MLB Trade Rumors using RSS
Home     Contact     About     Advertise     Archives     Widget     Twitter      RSS Usage

« Odds And Ends: International Signings, Lo Duca, Ichiro, ChiSox | Main | Selling Off The Mariners »

Rosenthal: Angels Looking Into Holliday

The Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim, residing in Orange County, California, are currently the second-worst run producers in the American League. That they have the second-best win percentage in the junior circuit is a testament to their superb pitching staff, led by John Lackey and his 1.44 ERA, though with about 40 fewer innings than most of the team's other starters.

They'd like to add a bat before the trading deadline, though there are a few problems with that. Take, for instance, Ken Rosenthal's report that they are interested in Rockies left fielder Matt Holliday. In order to fit him into the scheme, the Angels would have to somehow unload Gary Matthews Jr, who is owed $33 million from 2009 through 2011. That's not an easy proposition, considering the 2006 fluke is hitting just .239/.318/.361.

According to Rosenthal, this Matthews situation means that the Angels would have to go even further with their prospects and cash in order to make a deal. This might indicate that the team will stand pat and rely on its pitching going forward. Former GM Bill Stoneman was never one for a mid-season move, and his replacement Tony Reagins has expressed similar sentiments.

The Rays could also look into acquiring Holliday, which would round out a stellar outfield. They have more than enough on the farm to get something done. Both teams could also look into Jason Bay, Xavier Nady, Ken Griffey Jr., or Adam Dunn.


TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e200e55382ac178833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Rosenthal: Angels Looking Into Holliday:

Comments

Why not go after Garret Atkins or Casey Blake and shift Chone over to second? They could use Kendrick as a piece in the trade. Howie is a nice little player but I really don't see much more upside to him that what we've already seen.

The Rays already have an All Star LFer and I don't think ole Matt Holliday would be very happy with a position change

So did Gary Matthews Jr. come out and say it was a good deal for the Angels still?

"...I don't think ole Matt Holliday would be very happy with a position change."

Do you know Matt?

What makes you believe he wouldn't shift from left to right while going from one of the worst teams to one of the best?

They aren't benching Kendrick.

I remember when GMJ was supposed to be good, and would be much better than Joe Crede value wise according to many Angels fans. Willing to stick to that claim now boys? Yeah. Color me skeptical but it seems like the new formatting has weeded out a few of the more.... interesting commenters out there. The night is darkest just before the dawn(get it? it was black before)

"They aren't benching Kendrick."

Never said to bench Kendrick.

I said, "They could use Kendrick as a piece in the trade."

didn't see that part. I probably wouldn't trade him but hey it's an idea.

Why would a team want a 38-year old outfielder that makes $8.5MIL and is hitting .240?

Change the title of this post to "Yankees Looking Into Holliday" and you have something!

Kendrick has hit his ceiling? The guy has barely a full year of pro ball under his belt. He is coming off an injury and has taken some time to right the ship. He will be a 330+ hitter with 15HR capability. You don't trade a player like him to solve a short term problem.

I would rather see the Angels go after Tejada. They can give Houston Aybar and Willits/Rivera. If they are set on adding an outfielder then look at Giles or C. Lee. You can probably acquire both with little cost in terms of trading pieces. Both players should be salary dumps at this point (especially Lee who is owed almost $80m over the next 4 years).

"I remember when GMJ was supposed to be good, and would be much better than Joe Crede value wise according to many Angels fans."

Um, what need do the Angels have for Crede? Figgins is a much more valuable player, both for his versatility and his offense.

"I would rather see the Angels go after Tejada. They can give Houston Aybar and Willits/Rivera."

So, you trade a 24 year old Rafael Furcal-esque player with more upside as far as power along with a valuable bench/trade chip for a 34 year old guy who has more power now, but is much closer to the end of his career and would be a defensive and speed loss? Why in the world would you do that?

"What makes you believe he wouldn't shift from left to right while going from one of the worst teams to one of the best?"

Why would you put a guy who is only a so-so defender in a more defensively challenging position? And on top of it, he would be more expensive for not all that much of an improvement over the guy they have there now (Hinske)

As for trading Kendrick, why would you even think of doing that? A 24 year old who has, in just about one full season, a BA of .306 and plays stellar defense? On top of that, he has not even touched his power potential, which is tremendous. He projects to be a right-handed Tony Gwynn type with 20 HR/50 2B power. Forget it.

Not sure what bjsguess is smoking, but whay would the Angels want to add Giles and Carlos Lee to an already crowded outfield, and take on another 80 million in salary???

Lee would be VERY costly in players going back to Houston, I can see Giles for Willits as a possiblilty, but how many overpaid outfielders do the Angels need??

No reason to trade Kendricks.

Ease up on the hippy lettuce.

Is Rex Hudler posting under the name AA?

Let's go one by one here:

1. Joe Crede is one of the very best defensive third basemen in the game. Figgins is not. Crede can provide power to a power-starved team. Figgins can not. And as you say, Figgins' value is in his versatility, so why pigeon-hole him at 3B? Crede improves the Angels defense, adds much-needed power to the lineup, and frees up Figgins to do his super-sub thing. Or, how about just going off VORP? Crede - 12.7, Figgins - 6.4

2. Not only does Erick Aybar n ot have more power upside than Rafael Furcal, he's hardly Furcalesque. When Furcal was 22, he played 131 games (455 ABs) and tallied 28 extra-base hits and 40 stolen bases with a .394 OBP. Aybar is 24, has played in 166 games (425 ABs) and has career totals of 22 extra-base hits, 10 steals, and a ghastly .285 OBP. Maybe you're looking at different stats? Maybe you're going off what Mickey Hatcher said? Anyway, I don't think the Angels should pursue Tejada, nor do I think the Astros would trade him just yet.

3. Kendrick is a nice player, and makes amazingly consistent contact. However, he's going to have a really hard time hitting .300 with his utter lack of plate discipline. He's been to the plate 792 times in his career and he has drawn a grand total of 21 walks. That's like two walks a month. He's going to need to hit a ton of doubles to help off-set that. And not even the overly-homer Angels broadcast team wouldn't categorize Howie's defense as "stellar". Oh, and did you really compare Kendrick to a Hall of Famer considered by some to be the greatest hitter ever, but with more power?!?!

"Joe Crede is one of the very best defensive third basemen in the game. Figgins is not. Crede can provide power to a power-starved team. Figgins can not. And as you say, Figgins' value is in his versatility, so why pigeon-hole him at 3B?"

Crede is on pace for 30 errors and you call him one of the best defensive third basemen in the game? Meanwhile, Figgins is on pace for a grand total of 3. Crede has a slightly higher Range Factor, though that is heavily skewed by Chicago's ground ball heavy rotation. Figgins has a better arm, is quick and has never played full time to develop his natural ability. Further, Figgins is a perfect player for the style Scioscia preaches, in a big park where home run numbers are naturally depressed anyway. Additionally, do you really think Crede provides the same power at Angel Stadium that he does at New Comiskey? Not a chance in the world.

"Kendrick is a nice player, and makes amazingly consistent contact. However, he's going to have a really hard time hitting .300 with his utter lack of plate discipline."

That is something that comes with time. Further, have you ever looked at Ichiro's numbers? 49 is the most walks he has ever had in a season. If you make contact, who cares if you walk?

"Oh, and did you really compare Kendrick to a Hall of Famer considered by some to be the greatest hitter ever, but with more power?!?!"

Not yet, but that is where his potential lies.

"Not only does Erick Aybar not have more power upside than Rafael Furcal"

Really? Have you checked out their minor league numbers? I didn't say Aybar was there yet, I said his potential was better.

"Aybar is 24, has played in 166 games (425 ABs) and has career totals of 22 extra-base hits, 10 steals, and a ghastly .285 OBP. Maybe you're looking at different stats?"

And how many of those games were played as a sub or coming off an injury?

Perhaps you should actually watch the guy play.

"Oh, and did you really compare Kendrick to a Hall of Famer considered by some to be the greatest hitter ever, but with more power?!?!"

No-one considers Tony Gwynn the greatest hitter ever. If you can find one please tell me where they are, because I would like to tattoo Ted Williams stats on their forehead, choke them out with a Bonds jersey, and put out lit cigarettes on their forearms until they can tell me everyone ahead of Gwynn on the all time hits list.

I also would put pete rose and Tycobbs name on there forehead,
And Howie is a great hitter and i dont know how you say he will have trouble hitting .300 he has over come wrist problems and still hit over .300 and there are alot of great hitters who dont walk but just hit like he is supposed to

Well Future Prospect its cause he is a better player

see this is why most Angels fans are full of bs. Saying Figgins is a better than Crede isn't even the most asinine thing in this topic, that award goes to Aybar>Furcal. Furcal is so much better, it isn't even close. At least you can make a shade of an argument for Crede

Well Angels fans it's because Furcal and Crede are better players. Do you know how stupid that makes you look and how badly you represent your team and fans?

Way to bring errors into the argument, Crede gets to so many balls its insane. His defense alone makes him more valuable than Figgins but he's also worlds better offensively. Versatility doesn't mean anything when you have a .700 OPS and can't muster 200 ABs in the first half of the season because you're too injured. Get a clue people, take off your Angel red glasses and quit the bias

Kendrick hit .360+ through the minor leagues with essentially the same contact rate. He can rake. He just needs to stay healthy and stay on the field

As for Crede & Figgins... they're entirely different kinds of players. Figgins speed make him a much better fit for the Angels style of play, and his improved defense at 3B makes the comparison to Crede a much closer call. Figgins versatility, which has historically increased his value, also had to contribute to his defensive struggles. With a singular focus on one position, his defense has improved dramatically.

gogopalehose ... are you really calling out Figgins for his durability? Crede has hardly been an iron man over the previous 1.5 seasons.

SanDiegoGuy ... you need to read my comment and understand the context. This post is about the Angels acquiring Holliday - the assumption is that the Angels are looking for offensive help and considering targeting the outfield.

I am dead set AGAINST Holliday because of the prospects AND dollars required to get and keep him. As an ALTERNATIVE I suggested that they might want to explore Lee or Giles because they would cost very little to acquire.

Lee provides serious power (which the Angels lack). Giles would make an ideal #2 hitter who gets on base in front of the big guys.

I'm not advocating BOTH - those were just two suggestions that wouldn't cost the farm. Also, I would hope that the Angels DON'T look for help in the OF. I would rather the upgrade come at SS.

Finally, Tejada is not ideal. However, the Angels need an offensive upgrade now. I don't think that Aybar will be anything more than an average ML SS. He can be replaced. Tejada provides more pop and will take a walk every now and then. Again the cost will be low in that Willits/Rivera don't play much and Aybar won't have a position after the trade.

Ahhh yes, nothing says “everyone would want Crede” like no one wanting Crede three months ago… When a SanFran team without a single positive option to use at 3B is the only team willing to even offer a salary-dump and B-prospect package, you know how unwanted you really are…

Anyway, the Angels single biggest problem is having players get on base ~ removing Figgins and replacing him with Crede would be one of the stupidest things the Angels could ever do…

When you mention errors, you should probably also mention the fact that Crede has been involved in twice as many plays this season. He's also "on pace" for more assists and more double plays. But really I'm going off the last few years where Crede has earned the reputation as one of the best fielding third basemen in the game, error paces be damned.

Looking at Kendrick's minor league numbers, he's not shown any progression in drawing walks, and it's certainly not something Scioscia or Hatcher preaches. The thing about Gwynn was that he rarely struck out, unlike Kendrick. And that's not something that's guaranteed to improve over time. It may, it may not. But let's let him play a little more before we determine if he's Tony Gwynn or Placido Polanco. Also, Ichiro's is an excellent fielder and baserunner, and those two attributes help make up for his allergy to walks. Kendrick is neither. Let the fruit ripen before comparing apples to oranges.

I'm not sure what else to say about Furcal/Aybar, except that if Aybar was as good as Furcal he wouldn't be playing as a sub.

I watch these guys play quite a bit, as they play about 15 minutes from my house. I'm not an Angels fan, so I can look at the team and the prospects in an unbiased fashion. I mean, shouldn't Dallas McPherson be playing at third with Brandon Wood at short?

"No-one considers Tony Gwynn the greatest hitter ever. If you can find one please tell me where they are, because I would like to tattoo Ted Williams stats on their forehead, choke them out with a Bonds jersey, and put out lit cigarettes on their forearms until they can tell me everyone ahead of Gwynn on the all time hits list."

Settle down man. I think it's Williams as well, but remember Gwynn won eight batting titles, and he most likely did so PED free. He also played in an integrated era of baseball. Google "greatest hitter ever" and Gwynn's name comes up on the first page. It's also not a ridiculous argument.

Oh, and I meant Tony Sr., not Jr. Does that help?

Google "greatest hitter ever" and Gwynn's name comes up on the first page.

Just for shiggles, I did.

1. Ted Williams
2. Ted Williams
3. a word puzzle
4. Ted Williams
5. top 10 list -No Gwynn.
6. Barry Bonds
7. Ted Williams
8. Pujols' K to HR rate
9. some nonsense about BigHurt
10. Ted Williams/Babe Ruth then a msg board cluster&&&k.

"It's also not a ridiculous argument."

It is a ridiculous argument, it is completely ridiculous.

He wasn't even the best hitter in the NL West during his career. '93 some dude showed up and dropped a 204 OPS+.

"Settle down man."

I'm quite calm, I'm focusing on your ridiculous comment because discussing the Angels trying to pick up an OF, would probably give me a stroke.

Any team that trades for Holliday is going to hate themselves after they realize they gave up a boatload of talent for an .800 OPS poor defensive LF.

Tony Gwynn's full season career high OBP is basically Bond's career average.

" discussing the Angels trying to pick up an OF"

Was supposed to be an overrated expensive OF.

Just hit refresh and Gwynn's name did popup. Though it was a link to a blog stating that listing him as the greatest hitter ever, is ridiculous.

"The one that caught my eye was "Best Hitter: Tony Gwynn." Now, I'm not someone to knock Gwynn because I loved watching him play, but best hitter? Come on, now. He's not even the best hitter of his era. I don't know what they were thinking..."

Dude won eight batting titles, tied with Cobb for most ever. I know batting average involves luck and all that, but you do not luck your way into eight batting titles.

Also, Gwynn hit against non-white pitchers.

How about Tony Gwynn's one of the greatest contact hitters. Or, Tony Gwynn was one of the best ever at using a rounded piece of wood to strike and make solid contact to a round ball that is thrown in his general direction off of a mound of dirt that is 60 and a half feet away, without any restrictions on the nationality of the person throwing the ball. Can you wrap your head around that?

"Why in the world would you rather have Chone Figgans over Joe Crede. Crede is flat out a better offensive and defensive player, Crede should have a gold glove maybe even more than 1 but AA is trying to say Chone Figgans is a better player"

You are insane. One, Figgins' defensive numbers are better overall this year than Crede, and this is his first truly full year at third (and he still played 7 games at second). Their range factors are similar, despite Crede having more of a ground ball staff, while Figgins is making FAR fewer errors. Physically, Figgins has the better arm and is much, much quicker and faster.

As for offense, the only thing Crede has on Figgins is power. Figgins is faster, hits better for average, gets on base more...

All that, and Figgins can play 7 positions while Crede can maybe play 2.

"I mean, shouldn't Dallas McPherson be playing at third with Brandon Wood at short?"

Um, what? McPherson missed all of last year after back surgery and never performed when given the chance at the ML level. The Angels had no choice but to let him go because of how long they kept him around waiting. As for Wood, he got his chance as well this year with Figgins and Kendrick out. He hit 1 HR and 1 2B with an average under .170. All that, and the Angels just made the A's look bad again and are 5 games clear.

"When you mention errors, you should probably also mention the fact that Crede has been involved in twice as many plays this season."

Did you even bother looking at Figgins numbers? Probably not. I said 3 as opposed to 2 because Figgins has played more than half the Angels games this year and 44 of those at third. His RF is but .05 lower than Crede's despite the fact that he is 6 inches (or more) shorter.

"Looking at Kendrick's minor league numbers, he's not shown any progression in drawing walks, and it's certainly not something Scioscia or Hatcher preaches."

Oh really? Hatcher has always preached an aggressive style at the plate, relying on hits and speed to get on base much more than walks.

"The thing about Gwynn was that he rarely struck out, unlike Kendrick."

You claim to have seen Kendrick's minor league numbers, yet claim he struck out a ton, which is plainly untrue. He has K'd more in the majors, though that will indeed drop as he makes more consistent contact, as if he isn't already. Plus, Kendrick has much, much more power potential than Gwynn, which means he will likely K more.

"Also, Ichiro's is an excellent fielder and baserunner, and those two attributes help make up for his allergy to walks. Kendrick is neither."

Ichiro hits lead off and is asked to steal more. Kendrick has plenty of speed, it is really a question of him being asked to use it. Further, have you seen his defensive numbers in the minors? Huge range factors and respectable error rates. Same this year in the majors.

"However, the Angels need an offensive upgrade now."

Why? Anderson's bat is heating up and the Angels are finally healthy. Oh, and they are 5 games ahead

AA, your reading comprehension is garbage...

Anyone saying that Kendrick is "a nice little player" who has "probably reached his ceiling" PROBABLY needs to just stop posting here entirely.

You're all so fixated on the Gwynn parallel that was drawn that you've forgotten the amazing accolades poured upon Kendrick for the last 5 or so years. His CAREER minor league average is .359. He hit over .320 in the majors last year, despite constant injuries and bounce backs from them. His hitting .330 so far this year. And now, someone has the audacity to come into a discussion and say "he'll have trouble hitting .300?"

Are you INSANE? He's never hit below .300 at any level in his LIFE, save for a small sample in the majors in '06 (.285). Now you claim he won't do it because he's not drawing enough walks? Since when do you need to draw a ton of walks to hit for AVERAGE? Gwynn drew about 40 walks a year, and so does Ichiro. Sure, it'll hurt Howie's OBP, but it won't mean anything in regards to average.

Anyone following Baseball America, or even loosely familiar with minor league baseball knows that Kendrick is one of the most highly regarded prospects in all of baseball over the last several years, and saying he's reached his ceiling after 2 injury-filled years to start a career (and he's only 24) is to basically flat-out admit that you've never followed baseball a day in your life.

As an avid fan that finds ways to watch the Angels regularly even while living in Africa there are a few things I have to say about this.

First, Holliday or any outfielder would be a ridiculous addition. In all honesty, it would be better to unload Rivera and Willets in a trade. The problem is that we have age really bearing down on our outfield. Their power numbers are not where they need to be and they are all prone to injuries.

The infield while young doesn't have much power but is extremely talented at hitting. Kotchman, Kendrick, and Figgins all have .300 potential. Aybar and Izturis also have the potential but I see them as more .280 hitters. So, here's the question what do you give up and how do you add power.

I think, first, all the arguments about Figgins and Crede are not legitimate unless someone can offer an alternative leadoff solution. There is an option of keeping Willets for that role (I believe that he can be an Eckstein-like player) but then you are just taking away one of the guys that has some power potential to replace him with someone who has none.

I honestly think as much as I love his defense and his play that the Angels should dangle Kotchman in front of Atlanta for Teixeira. Also offer a pitching prospect. They should only do this however if they can ink Tex to a long-term deal of 3-5 years. If not, stand pat!

I also think that it is time to bring up Kendry Morales and let him be the full-time DH. His power potential is better than GMJ at this point and there is no way that his average could be worse.

Here is what we could/should look like!

Figgins
Kendrick
Vlad
Tex
Hunter
GA
Morales
Mathis/Nap
Izzy/Aybar

and without him I think we can just put Kotch in the three-hole and Vlad in cleanup duty. Otherwise the lineup should be the same.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment


Top Stories



Search MLBTR

Lijit Search

MLBTR Features



Recent Posts


MLBTR Mailing List

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner


Rumors By Team



Monthly Archives


Live Chats


Tuesdays at 2 p.m. CST



Site Map     Contact     About     Advertise     Privacy Policy     Widget     Twitter     Rss Feed


MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com.