![]() |
|
|
| |
« Giants-Renteria Rumor False | Main | Red Sox To Sign Tazawa? »
6:20pm: Impacto Deportivo says the surprise team is the Braves, possibly offering four years and $52MM. It'd be wise to treat the report with caution until it is confirmed by another source.
6:09pm: The Reds had a brief conversation with Kinzer about Furcal, but it probably isn't going anywhere.
3:58pm: ESPN's Enrique Rojas says Furcal traveled to the West Coast today, where he could sign with the Giants or A's. However, a third team remains involved.
1:36pm: Yahoo's Tim Brown talked to Furcal's agent, Paul Kinzer. Kinzer called the El Caribe report "bogus." Apparently there has been no four-year, $48MM offer from Oakland nor are the Mets interested. And Furcal doesn't want to move to second base anyway.
The A's and Giants are leading the charge for Furcal, with a "surprise team" also in the mix.
12:26pm: SI.com's Jon Heyman does not believe the Mets made an offer to Furcal.
12:11pm: Susan Slusser's A's source calls the below report "untrue," but it's unclear to what degree.
8:40am: Dylan Hernandez of the L.A. Times passes along a report from El Caribe, a newspaper in the Dominican Republic. In the report, Rafael-Fellito Ortiz talked to free agent shortstop Rafael Furcal. Furcal says he has a four-year, $48MM deal on the table from the A's (with another $2MM in incentives). Surprisingly, he also has an offer from the Mets, who would use him as a second baseman. Ortiz believes Furcal might sign soon.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e201053614f655970b
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Rafael Furcal Rumors: Monday:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
My goodness. Unless the Dodgers know Furcal's medical condition is absolutely terrible, they are completely stupid for not resigning him. The deal is even an annual pay cut.
Posted by: AA | November 24, 2008 at 08:42 AM
Way to go Ned. Let the best free agent SS walk away because you want his replacement to come up through the minors in the next 2 years. Signing Furcal to an extra year is worth the benefit of having him lead off for the next 3 years while he's productive.
Now we're going to sign Cabrera or Renteria for $10M a year for below league average production. Awesome.
Posted by: DodgersBruin | November 24, 2008 at 08:55 AM
Again.
Coletti is a HORRIBLE GM. Dodger fans should be yearning for DePodesta to come back (and that's saying something!).
Posted by: FlushingMets | November 24, 2008 at 08:59 AM
Was wondering if Minaya would try to get Furcal as the replacement for Castillo. Makes a lot of sense, he would be a stellar 2B now that his range is diminishing.
Posted by: CubbyFan23 | November 24, 2008 at 09:10 AM
wow, the a's really are sick of losing. they are ready to spend. if they do sign furcal, i think they would go hard after giambi. that would leave them with a pretty formidable lineup in 09 with a lot of good young pitchers ready to make an impact. they could contend.
Posted by: minnesotawins | November 24, 2008 at 09:14 AM
Furcal was injured or terrible for 60 Percent of his time as a Dodger.
Not sure you reward such performance with a long term commitment for a player who is no longer in his prime!
Not to mention, at some point in time you have to trust your player development.
The Dodgers have two good, young, cheap shortstop prospects and a limited budget.
Shortstop is also the one position where defense is most important and Hu is the equal to Furcal on defense.
Colletti has to spend McCourt's cash wisely.
Posted by: MikeClarke | November 24, 2008 at 09:20 AM
wow, everyone ripped colletti if he was going to give furcal a two or three yr deal. he beens hurt too much, etc. but when a report came from a dominican newspaper, which have proven not-so-correct(franky rod to the mets) that hell sign a 4yr deal? good luck As, hope u have a good back-up-plan
Posted by: lakersdodgersyankees4life | November 24, 2008 at 09:30 AM
Still wondering why Beane traded Haren, Blanton and Harden if the A's have this kind of money to spend on Holliday and Furcal.
Posted by: MPM | November 24, 2008 at 09:35 AM
I would not give Cabrera or Renteria more than a one year deal as stopgaps for Hu or DeJesus...
Posted by: MikeClarke | November 24, 2008 at 09:40 AM
Orlando Cabrera OPS+ over last 4 years: 81, 91, 95, 84.
Edgar Renteria OPS+ over last 4 years: 89, 104, 125, 84.
BOTH are Type A free agents (giving up our 1st round pick if offered arbitration).
Furcal OPS+: 102, 107, 76, 164.
Remember, Furcal injured his ankle in Spring Training in 2007 and never recovered.
The Dodgers showed they won't give the job to Hu, but rather Berroa. Berroa, Renteria and Cabrera are all horrible. The Dodgers might as well just pass on Manny and take the draft picks from him, Lowe and Blake. They have no lead-off hitter and will just waste money and draft picks on a crappy SS. Wonderful.
Posted by: DodgersBruin | November 24, 2008 at 09:56 AM
DeJesus is about 2 years away. Hu is glove ready, but is a 4A hitter. IMO, Hu is the stop gap, and the Dodgers should pass on Cabrera and Renteria, utlizing their money on pitching and ManRam. They should sign a utility guy like Punto or Cintron who can play short. Although, Cabrera might have a shot to have National League bump to his production.
Posted by: aj7380 | November 24, 2008 at 09:56 AM
Billy Beane has a reputation for being a pretty smart guy! He must feel comfortable with that medical report. The Dodgers better get Manny or another big bat in the order if they're planning on having a AAA shortstop. Manny was the only reason they got away with Berroa last year! And no Colletti...DO NOT bring back Julio Lugo!!
Posted by: Big Mac | November 24, 2008 at 10:02 AM
Billy Beane has a reputation for being a pretty smart guy! He must feel comfortable with that medical report. The Dodgers better get Manny or another big bat in the order if they're planning on having a AAA shortstop. Manny was the only reason they got away with Berroa last year! And no Colletti...DO NOT bring back Julio Lugo!!
Posted by: Big Mac | November 24, 2008 at 10:06 AM
it is going to be extremely amusing/horrifying to see how ned is going to handle having to plug all these holes if furcal walks. i can see him dropping 3 years, 33-36 million dollars or orlando cabrera. typical ned signing. or maybe he'll even pull out the "grittiness and scrapper" card and sign eckstein. all's i know is that i'm scared and i'm not wearing any pants.
Posted by: jmurray | November 24, 2008 at 10:55 AM
"Still wondering why Beane traded Haren, Blanton and Harden if the A's have this kind of money to spend on Holliday and Furcal. "
Easy - the A's are loaded with young pitching in the minors. Haren was somewhat questionable, but they got a very good return and do you really blame Beane for dealing Harden with all the risk that he brings?
Posted by: vtadave | November 24, 2008 at 10:56 AM
4/$48??? Wow thats alot. I was hoping the Cubs would offer somewhere in the neighborhood of 4/$35-$40 but $48 mil is way to much.
Posted by: uww1 | November 24, 2008 at 11:31 AM
interesting take on the Mets. So they're going to have 2 second basemen making a total of $20 million per year for the next 3 years???
And pay the price of two closers this year???
Also wonder who'd lead off, Reyes or Furcal???
Posted by: philsWSchamps | November 24, 2008 at 12:24 PM
Furcal at 4/48 is a great deal if he's healthy. He's a good defensive SS and an ideal leadoff man with a high OBP, good power and speed. If this guy was completely healthy he'd be warranting $15M a year, and I really think that 4/48 should be a solid deal for whoever signs it.
I'm not so sure 4/48 makes as much sense for Oakland, but that's fair value for a player of his caliber.
Posted by: scribbletone | November 24, 2008 at 12:25 PM
""Still wondering why Beane traded Haren, Blanton and Harden if the A's have this kind of money to spend on Holliday and Furcal. "
They dealt Haren, Blanton, Swisher, and Harden to build up the farm system and free up money, so they can go out and get Holliday without depleting the farm (two of the guys in the Holliday trade were from the Haren trade), and have a steady stream of young talent through the pipelines for years to come.
Posted by: melonis rex | November 24, 2008 at 12:29 PM
I didnt think it was the Mets making an offer. Who made the other offer?
Posted by: uww1 | November 24, 2008 at 12:35 PM
If the Mets are offering Furcal money that could be better spent on a closer, then someone needs to kick Minaya out of the building and not let him back in till he sobers up.
I can't wait till five years from now when the Met's realize they really blew it by not surrounding David Wright with the right pieces to win a championship.
Posted by: basicslop | November 24, 2008 at 12:44 PM
"The Dodgers have two good, young, cheap shortstop prospects and a limited budget."
Wrong. The Dodgers have one good prospect at short in DeJesus, though he hasn't proven himself above AA ball. Hu is a genius with the glove, but has shown himself to be a AAA/AAAA hitter. That is hardly inspiring enough to let one of the best shortstops in baseball go away, especially when DeJesus can be brought up at 2B.
"Furcal at 4/48 is a great deal if he's healthy. He's a good defensive SS and an ideal leadoff man with a high OBP, good power and speed. If this guy was completely healthy he'd be warranting $15M a year, and I really think that 4/48 should be a solid deal for whoever signs it."
The Dodgers need to jump all over this deal. It seems they really upset him, however.
Posted by: AA | November 24, 2008 at 12:47 PM
4/48 is not a good option for Furcal. His injury history is too worrisome for a club like the Dodgers, with so many holes, to pursue. They should use internal options at SS and sign O-Dog to play 2B.
Posted by: surfacetear | November 24, 2008 at 12:59 PM
I'm not really buying the denials. Furcal is directly quoted in the story as saying such offers exist (Although perhaps they got the numbers wrong with the A's offer, as Furcal's not quoted giving the numbers, that could be what SS is referring to).
Now agents say things for negotiating reasons, GMs say things for negotating reasons, but I can't recall the last time a player made up an offer for a negotating ploy. Nor can I remember a writer that wants to be taken seriously that would blatently make up a false quote. They usually tend to hide behind the "Anomynous Source".
as I can't imagine a
Posted by: AdropOFvenom | November 24, 2008 at 01:09 PM
This is a beautiful deal.
Come on A's, please sign him.
Posted by: melonis rex | November 24, 2008 at 01:35 PM
The Giants need to get in here and nab this guy up. Since Texeira is completely too expensive, Furcal fits the bill for the one position they REALLY need to fill and can afford to do so.
They need to get in there and grab him while the Braves and Cubs are battling over Peavy. Thoughts?
Posted by: dwa18 | November 24, 2008 at 01:40 PM
Mystery Team= agent created rumor to drive up the asking price of other teams.
Posted by: basicslop | November 24, 2008 at 01:43 PM
"Mystery Team= agent created rumor to drive up the asking price of other teams."
Maybe, but I'm hoping it's the White Sox. They could move Furcal to 2B and Ramirez to SS, or just keep Ramirez at 2B if Furcal won't move. Then one way or another you solve both the 2B and leadoff man problems.
Posted by: PorkChopExpress | November 24, 2008 at 01:46 PM
"Maybe, but I'm hoping it's the White Sox. They could move Furcal to 2B and Ramirez to SS, or just keep Ramirez at 2B if Furcal won't move. Then one way or another you solve both the 2B and leadoff man problems."
Then why were the Sox dumba-ses and traded for Wilson Effing Betemit.
Gordon Beckham will force the Alexei move to SS in a couple of years. No way the Sox block their top prospect w/ a 4 year signing of Furcal.
Posted by: melonis rex | November 24, 2008 at 02:02 PM
Cubs = not battling over Peavy; no money (ended when they signed Dempster). Also, not going to pay Furcal big bucks when Lou loves Theriot and would have the headache of having to tell Soriano that he can't leadoff anymore.
Posted by: rememberthecoop | November 24, 2008 at 02:10 PM
"but it's unclear to what degree."
Um, how about 100%?
Posted by: rememberthecoop | November 24, 2008 at 02:14 PM
Mystery team is the Indians. They've got the money and need a leadoff man. Asdrubal will remain at 2nd and Peralta will shift to 3rd.
Posted by: the lowercase zach is better | November 24, 2008 at 02:14 PM
What's with these Latin news sources? First, the bogus K-Rod article and now the bogus Furcal article. Very sketchy journalistic credentials/integrity to say the least...
Posted by: FlushingMets | November 24, 2008 at 02:20 PM
I'm glad there are no sketchy journalistic writings or bogus rumors here in the US.
It's only those Latin news sources.
Posted by: studio179 | November 24, 2008 at 02:26 PM
Well Renteria to the Giants. So that leaves Oakland and Willie Wankas Mysterious Team of Althetes...
I think the mystery team is the Royals. That's cause I'm a Royals fan. No real sound reasoning to it.
Posted by: basicslop | November 24, 2008 at 03:30 PM
Why aren't the Dodgers in on Furcal? Are they sure he's going to get a 4 year deal? I would think that's too long for the Dodgers but 3/36 seems doable for them.
Posted by: surfacetear | November 24, 2008 at 04:07 PM
"Then why were the Sox dumba-ses and traded for Wilson Effing Betemit.
Gordon Beckham will force the Alexei move to SS in a couple of years. No way the Sox block their top prospect w/ a 4 year signing of Furcal."
I feel like Betemit is more of a third baseman for them until Dayan Viciedo is ready, maybe sharing some time with Josh Fields. I'm trying really hard to not vent on that Swisher deal, which was essentially trading away your farm for a guy and then trading him a year later for nothing. Ugh.
And I agree that the mystery team surely isn't the White Sox. But then I wonder, why would they be interested in Hudson all along then, as has been rumored? I think the White Sox could be that team under one scenario: The White Sox sign Furcal to play shortstop, with Alexei Ramirez sticking at second. When Gordon Beckham is ready, Furcal, whose defense will likely have declined some, will move over to second, with Ramirez moving to center field. That could very well be a potential plan for Chicago, because Furcal fits their needs offensively perfectly, and would be a huge addition to that team in the short term.
Posted by: scribbletone | November 24, 2008 at 04:17 PM
MY GOD! The Oakland A's are looking to acquire a torpedo!!! This has to be breaking some kind of MLB arms treaty...
I think there are lot of things being lost in the translation on Rojos report.
Posted by: basicslop | November 24, 2008 at 04:18 PM
Well, I really really wish they showed the "surprise team"...
Posted by: baseballismylyf4 | November 24, 2008 at 04:24 PM
the only places i see him ending up is
.....
A's-Short Stop
Mets-Second Base
Dodgers-Short Stop
Posted by: addymaster04 | November 24, 2008 at 04:28 PM
OAKLAND OAKLAND OAKLAND OAKLAND
Posted by: OaklandAs | November 24, 2008 at 04:30 PM
"I'm glad there are no sketchy journalistic writings or bogus rumors here in the US.
It's only those Latin news sources."
Its early but this might be the most ignorant comment of the offseason thus far.
Posted by: walkoffblast | November 24, 2008 at 04:33 PM
I took studio's comment as sarcasm.
Posted by: Tim Dierkes | November 24, 2008 at 04:44 PM
I'm pretty sure the Dodgers are on the west coast too!
You never know!
Posted by: Big Mac | November 24, 2008 at 04:54 PM
Walkoffblast, I'll try and spell it out for you. My comment was pure sarcasm, as Tim pointed out. It stems from the comment directly above mine that stated...
"What's with these Latin news sources? First, the bogus K-Rod article and now the bogus Furcal article. Very sketchy journalistic credentials/integrity to say the least..."
Then I posted...
"I'm glad there are no sketchy journalistic writings or bogus rumors here in the US.
It's only those Latin news sources."
Meaning that it was a bad judgement call on the poster to single out Latin journalism bogus reports. Maybe the poster did not mean it, but it came out that way.
Btw, today has had various bogus reports from various sources.
Thank you.
Posted by: studio179 | November 24, 2008 at 06:18 PM
Could the mystery team be the Tigers? They don't have the money right now, but an Ordonez trade could be on the horizon.
Posted by: Rob M. | November 24, 2008 at 06:21 PM
If the Braves sign Furcal at 4/52, then we can basically guarentee that either Escobar or Johnson is gone. Maybe this is the precursor to a Johnson/Ludwick deal, or maybe they're talking to the White Sox about Dye. Obviously if they're this serious about Furcal, then they have some sort of Johnson/Escobar for a power hitting OF or a starter deal being seriously discussed.
Posted by: scribbletone | November 24, 2008 at 06:29 PM
wait braves now??? but Escobar is still the SS. a little premature for such a signing. unless, Wren has a deal in place?
Posted by: zephyr8 | November 24, 2008 at 06:34 PM
The Renteria rumor is what we'd in the Army call, "Bad Poop" , but whoever said it might have had a purpose such as to complicate the Furcal situation. I woke up this morning thinking Furcal was definitely going to Oaktown.
I logged on for the day 5 minutes after the Renteria rumor was posted saw, zero comments, and bypassed the chance to be the first comment in order to immediately ask Tim if it was obtained via a radio stream or via online print. As soon as Tim confirmed stream , I felt a huge rush to check out other sites and nobody reported it. Only that Edgars' agent and SF had exchanged offers. I thought this was legit because of the timing and the need and low cost of Renteria. Honestly though I thought that the Furcal deal was done with Oakland and Mr Kinzer was denying it just to keep the cost down by not starting a bidding war. If you say the deal is done before it is, then someone calls your bluff and starts a bidding war. Especially when the two bidders share the same metro area. I think Furcal is going to Oakland. By saying the negotiations are distant it lets the Giants think that they have more time then they actually do. Somehow Renteria plays into someones motives. Someone, probably, associated with or loyal to the A's leaked the story to WFAN because it had to come from somewhere credible or that WFAN guy should be fired.
Posted by: dbacks2008 | November 24, 2008 at 06:39 PM
Just wondering, if the Braves sign Furcal, could Escobar be traded to the Dodgers? Thoughts?
Posted by: | November 24, 2008 at 06:40 PM
It would be awesome move for the Braves. Furcal would bring an energy on the base path and in the dugout that has been absent since his leave.
Posted by: ChiefTomahawk | November 24, 2008 at 06:41 PM
ADDENDUM.. Edgars agent and SF apparently have been swapping offers for a few days, so although hes in Venezuela, saying that is somehow some sort of smokescreen. And also I feel there is a real need in SF to get a veteran SS because that might be what is needed to lure Orlando Hudson. Orlando does not want to coach infield drills in the prime of his life.
Posted by: dbacks2008 | November 24, 2008 at 06:43 PM
If the Braves sign Furcal, can Escobar be traded to the A's. In a three-way for Peavy, with prospects going to SD?
It would be perfect.
Although, if I'm a Braves fan, I'd MUCH rather have Escobar than Furcal.
Posted by: melonis rex | November 24, 2008 at 06:44 PM
the pads have said that they havent talked to them about peavy for weeks, so i feel this report is prob also false.
Just wondering, if the Braves sign Furcal, could Escobar be traded to the Dodgers? Thoughts?
this really wouldnt make sense. if the dodgers wanted a ss, theyd just sign furcal and not trade any young pitching
Posted by: lakersdodgersyankees4life | November 24, 2008 at 06:46 PM
If the Braves sign Furcal, Jake Peavy is a Brave within 24 hours.
Posted by: FineHamAbounds | November 24, 2008 at 06:46 PM
"Just wondering, if the Braves sign Furcal, could Escobar be traded to the Dodgers? Thoughts?"
Not unless Andre Ethier is going back to Atlanta. Which makes me think. Hmm.. I think I'd still rather have Ethier.
Posted by: scribbletone | November 24, 2008 at 06:46 PM
They MUST shore up the MIF in order to protect Lincecum. They MUST sign Orlando and they must sign a shortstop to compliment him, unless Burriss is an advanced fielder for his age and experience.
Posted by: dbacks2008 | November 24, 2008 at 06:47 PM
The other reason I think Furcal is going to the A's is because deep down most people realize that is the liklihood. Furcal would be awesome in the AL. He hasnt lived up to his potential in the NL. He needs a chance to DH every now and then so that he can hit to his potential. Hes like Miguel Tejada before he broke out.
Posted by: dbacks2008 | November 24, 2008 at 06:50 PM
Scribbletone, I saw Gordon Beckham a few games in AFL, he reminds me of Gabe Kapler. That is a good and also bad. Could be another flop.
Posted by: dbacks2008 | November 24, 2008 at 06:52 PM
Also the "Bogus Latin" story was not bogus. There was a physical involved somewhere. Teams always deny because they dont want to start a bidding war and also because the FA Friday hasnt happened yet. Omar of course is going to have K-Rod lined up to sign while denying the hell out of it and of course they are laughing at the "bogus" stories because they dont want a paranoid team to come in and make a NYY type of paranoia offer for him. He is going to be the best closer of all time, he will own all of the closer records and with him and Johan, that team is going to be the team for a long time. Phillies fans should thank GOD, that they won this year, they snuck in in a timely manner!
Posted by: dbacks2008 | November 24, 2008 at 06:57 PM
"Scribbletone, I saw Gordon Beckham a few games in AFL, he reminds me of Gabe Kapler. That is a good and also bad. Could be another flop."
The scouting reports about Gordon Beckham have been nothing but great so far, and he really seems like he could factor into the White Sox as soon as late 2009. Scouts say he projects as a 25-30 HR power hitter with good contact ability and solid plate discipline as well as a solid glove at short or a plus glove at second. As far as most people can tell, this guy is going to be a good player and pretty soon.
Posted by: scribbletone | November 24, 2008 at 07:04 PM
Well, to follow up my previous comment, what the hell is so surprising about the Braves? Furcal's former team, could have an opening at short.... No surprise in my mind
Posted by: baseballismylyf4 | November 24, 2008 at 07:16 PM
Hey Scribb, I said the same thing about Kapler as did alot of people. They are very very similar. Kapler was a bodybuilder and Beckham was a Polo player. They were both professionals in those disciplines which require more discipline than do baseball. Baseball is a good sport for boring people who like boredom. I thought Kapler would go 30/30. He is too rigid to do so though. Beckham is set up in the MIF so thats a positive, but looking at their rigid stances they both are R/R. They both are very muscular. Beckham has alot of potential but hes not a sure thing. Its all or nothing for him at 2B because I dont see him being a SS and someone who is used to succeeding at something like Polo and probably everything else he has done , I wonder how he would handle a failure at 2B and having to move to another position. He is a great guy, everyone likes him and roots for him. Im just saying alot of things could go wrong.
Posted by: dbacks2008 | November 24, 2008 at 07:17 PM
Well obviously there is a risk with every prospect and Gordon Beckham isn't a sure thing at all, but he is regarded by scouts as one of the more high probability top prospects in baseball.
Surely he could end up becoming the next Aaron Miles or something, but from his continued development all indications point towards him becoming close to the player I described before.
Posted by: scribbletone | November 24, 2008 at 07:45 PM
I am a scout and I just saw him play a week ago.
Posted by: dbacks2008 | November 24, 2008 at 07:50 PM
high probability of being the next Gabe Kapler but at 2B. Which at this point would be considered a success. Go look at Kaplers career , thats what I expect Beckhams to look like. He will probably go somewhere near 19hr-18sb around the age of 23 and then he will be hyped big time and then he will end up in a platoon and never reach that level again.
Posted by: dbacks2008 | November 24, 2008 at 07:55 PM
Okay and I'll take your one opinion with a grain of salt, just as I'll take the other 20 opinions I've read from other scouts, whose credibility is superior to yours. I never was really disagreeing with you anyways.
Posted by: scribbletone | November 24, 2008 at 07:56 PM
I assume that is boy scout?
Posted by: Blitzballer | November 24, 2008 at 08:05 PM
Scouts dont scout to get anyone to believe that they are a scout. They do it actually for the exact opposite. Oh no , disagreeing, such a bad word. Oh no, a puke, oh no , fool. Wow, what great commentary. I write to myself because that is what a scout does. Maybe one person will agree with me where 100 people will not. Thats how contrarians succeed.
Posted by: dbacks2008 | November 24, 2008 at 08:39 PM
Most established scouts with more credibility than I, dont do anything. They sit behind home plate where they cant even see the pitch location or the movement on the pitch. The Ump and catcher are in their way. They have radar guns which is outdated. They sit next to each other and talk to each other missing the game thats going on right in front of them. I know more than most scouts. They have cushy jobs. Advance Scouts do the real work. The scouts so have seen Beckham saw him a year or two ago, the people who are watching him now are front office people who work in a different capacity.
Posted by: dbacks2008 | November 24, 2008 at 08:43 PM
The fact that the response is so dismissal in tone ,to the possibility that a scout would be posting in here says that most of you dont welcome that news. That is amateurish. I see things before it happens. The way you are talking about Gordon Beckham is funny. Hes going to be better than Cano or Hudson. Wow. That is just rediculous. He just turned 22 a month ago. How can I be the bad guy by doubting him, he just turned 22. That is hilarious. You people just get mad that someone has confidence in their statement which simply shows envy. Scouts can do nothing but praise him at this point, he has a prefect track record. Nothing in life is that easy. Sorry. Logan Morrison was the best hitter I saw in spring. Doolittle was solid. Adrian Cardenas is overrated. I saw him make an error on a play that would have ended the game. Hes speedy but hes not that great. I think Triunfel is everything that Adrian Beltre was hyped to be. Chris Josh Reddick plays amazing defense in RF and has a rocket arm. Now if you were saying that Eric Young Jr was as great as youre talking about Beckham I couldnt disagree with you and he is only one year older. Chris Pettit can hit. Mike McHenry has alot of pop for such a compact player. Austin Jackson wont make it with the Yankees. Miranda hit alot of foul ball rockets, if he can make a small adjustment in his timing he could be very solid. Its quite impressive that the solidly-built Matt Weiters is a switch hitter. You can see how Van Pope was a prospect but now seems a bit of a flake. Ian Desmond does resemble a Jeter-like talent but he seems disinterested or in a phase of his life where baseball is not at the forefront of his mind. Tommy Hanson is the real deal as is Phil Hughes. Clay Buchholz is kind of flakey. Gaby Hernandez is quality. Brian Bogesevic has alot of potential that people are saying about Beckham.
I can spot talent, the first time I saw Jose Arredondo throw a fastball in Spring Training 2007 , I was in awe. I could go on all day. I could write a book better than Baseball Prospectus and the Bill James Handbook with my eyes shut. Although Bill James has some good concepts.
Posted by: dbacks2008 | November 24, 2008 at 09:04 PM
you're helpful
Posted by: scribbletone | November 24, 2008 at 09:05 PM
dbacks2008,
Have you seen Tommy Hanson play? I havent been able to yet in person but it seems he is the real deal. Whats your take?
Posted by: zephyr8 | November 24, 2008 at 09:08 PM
dbacks2008,
With what you have seen, do you think Atlanta's proposed deal for Jake Peavy was too much, or pretty fair? Just for Review: Escobar, Gorkys Hernandez, Blaine Boyer/ Jeff Locke/ Cole Rourhbough
Posted by: zephyr8 | November 24, 2008 at 09:14 PM
What does this have to do with Furcal?
Posted by: uww1 | November 24, 2008 at 09:18 PM
Hanson is on, I saw him play Saturday in the Championship game. I saw him and Hughes each pitch twice. I noticed something that both of them did. In each of their final innings of the season, they unleashed their arsenal and it was impressive. They are the only two pitchers I saw that did that but I was paying attention to them more. Hanson is on par with Phil Hughes and he is better than Clay Buccholz. I could write more detail but I would have to go back to my notes. I score every pitch like MLB gameday. I chart foul balls.
Posted by: dbacks2008 | November 24, 2008 at 09:20 PM
Tommy Hanson is going to be MVP of the league and its said that he may be the best pitcher in AFL history. Hes definitely got to be the best Braves pitching prospect since Kevin Millwood.
Posted by: dbacks2008 | November 24, 2008 at 09:23 PM
"Tommy Hanson is going to be MVP of the league and its said that he may be the best pitcher in AFL history."
Yeh i heard he could be MVP. A Pitchers never won that if im correct.
Posted by: zephyr8 | November 24, 2008 at 09:27 PM
I also love Mlb Gameday. As a braves fan living far from atlanta, They arent on TV anymore since their contract ran up with TBS. I watch it often cause im to cheap to buy mlb.tv
Posted by: zephyr8 | November 24, 2008 at 09:29 PM
Three straight batters faced , the #2,3,4 hitters he would have struck them all out on 9 pitches total, except the 9th pitch was swung on in the dirt and he beat the throw to first base for a scratch single. This is in the 3rd inning of the AFL Championship game. Then after giving up the scratch single he got up 0-2 on a strike taken and one swung at. Then fouled a few pitches off then flied out six pitches, that was the tough AB going up 0-2 and staying there basically. The next batter, popup on the first pitch. He was in a zone. They took him out of the game after he got a 4 pitch strikeout.
Posted by: dbacks2008 | November 24, 2008 at 09:32 PM
Hows Tommy's change up looking?
Posted by: Tim | November 24, 2008 at 09:44 PM
I dont know if its me , but it seems like its his best pitch. His location is awesome and timing. Hes basically perfect as far as I saw. To say that he is the best Braves pitcher since Millwood is an understatement.
I just checked my scorecard. He ended the first inning striking Arencibia out with an outside curve and then led off the 2nd striking McHenry out swinging on the same pitch. He then got Josh Donaldson to strike out swinging on the same pitch. Three batters in a row. This is not the same sequence I was talking about earlier. Maybe they were changeups or a mix of them. It was hard to tell from sitting behind the plate because I was sitting to the left so I could see the movement but couldnt tell if they were changes or curves.
Posted by: dbacks2008 | November 24, 2008 at 09:54 PM
The main reason Braves sent him down there was to work on his change up and some extra innings. That's why I asked.
Posted by: Tim | November 24, 2008 at 10:02 PM
The first sequence I was talking about he got Tolleson to strike out looking on that outside curve/change. Then he Struck out Arencibia on High Heat. Ok that last batter of the game was against EY2 who was batting LH and he got him swinging on that same curve/change to EY's inside of the plate. So that is his money pitch. He can get out the guy who won the AFL Batting title using that curve/change on either the inside or outside. He gave up a seeing-eye-single to EY to lead off the game, then an IF single that Chris Nelson made a nice stop deep in the hole , which could be considered a seeing-eye-single type hit. He walked the batting champe EY2 on NINE pitches so that was a battle, then that scratch single in the dirt. The third to last batter faced, Danny Valencia (OAK), he gave up a line drive that hit the warning track off the wall for a standup triple. He squared the pitch perfect. It had loft and was hit to the perfect location otherwise it would have been an out due to the loft.
Posted by: dbacks2008 | November 24, 2008 at 10:04 PM
Wow, this Beckham stuff is "rediculous".
Posted by: Blitzballer | November 24, 2008 at 10:06 PM
They probably wanted to get him as much experience as possible. He had to have just been refining himself. They must plan to unleash him on the NL. He has a calm cool demeanor too. Much calmer and cooler than Phil Hughes. Clay gets himself into trouble.
Posted by: dbacks2008 | November 24, 2008 at 10:07 PM
Oh yeah the first AFL game this year I was watching, the only player who stood out, Daniel Murphy? No, John Raynor Switch Hitter on Marlins. The next day he hit for the cycle and unfortunately he left early in Oct with a broken bone in his hand.
Posted by: dbacks2008 | November 24, 2008 at 10:26 PM
I can't wait to see him in the bigs but, I dont expect him up right away, at least if Braves can help it.If they can't get what they're after this off-season then maybe but, most likely after mid-season or an injury occurs.
Posted by: Tim | November 24, 2008 at 10:26 PM
"I could go on all day. I could write a book better than Baseball Prospectus and the Bill James Handbook with my eyes shut. Although Bill James has some good concepts."
I actually took the time to try and login simply to let you know you are a moron.
First of all, anyone on here who was a scout would not need to brag about it, or anything that they have done. If you wanted to be of use, you would simply respond to questions with intelligent responses. Responses like this show that you are a teenager with too much time on your hands; it's pretty pathetic.
Let's try and keep this on Furcal, you can brag about yourself on some other forums.
Posted by: Bdlugz | November 24, 2008 at 10:40 PM
dacks2008,
What's the biggest question you have with Beckham? I saw one breakdown of his swing and it appeared that his swing with an aluminum bat was a little long to transition to wood without some adjustments. Still, his wrists and hands seem quick enough to translate to possible success at the big league level. What are your thoughts on that evaluation and do you have any personal observations of how he's handling the transition to a wood bat?
I take a personal interest because we went to rival high schools and were only a year or two apart. I really hope he can make it to the bigs. Even if he only turns into Gabe Kapler with the bat, if he can play in the middle infield he probably has a long career ahead of him.
Posted by: nixa37 | November 24, 2008 at 10:45 PM
bdlugz,
I'd give the guy some credit for what he wrote up about those pitch sequences. If he's just pulling that out of his a$$ that's pretty ridiculous. I agree that comparing himself to Bill James or Baseball Prospectus is out there and I'm a huge stat head myself. Still, I do find the scouting side of things incredibly interesting and I personally wish there were similar sources (like James and BP) available on different scouts and their breakdowns and scouting reports of prospects. I'm giving him the benefit of the doubt and hoping that's what he was getting at.
Posted by: nixa37 | November 24, 2008 at 10:52 PM
That was pretty accurate I watched the game myself on gameday.
Posted by: Tim | November 24, 2008 at 11:01 PM
Bdlugz, I stated that a scouts job is not to prove everything to everyone but the exact opposite. Thats why im on this website so that I can get things off of my chest in anonymity. If that does not make perfect sense to you then I dont know what will. I dont think I am responding with anything but intelligent responses.
Nixa37 , exactly. He has a career ahead of him just like Kapler did. The haters on here think im saying that he wont have a career and that hes horrible. They have teeny tiny minds. He is stiff at the plate and if hes stiff at the plate that doesnt fare to well for someone who plays the most fluid position on the field. Hes definitely going to strike out alot. I can picture what youre saying about his swing being too long, hes definitely going to strikeout alot, and I dont know if I can say his wrists are fast but they are strong so he can probably fist MLB pitching into RF. Lots of jams and broken bats. He will swing at inside pitching for sure. Hes going to be exposed for being stiff just like Kapler was. If I remember correctly I think he had one of the more amazing bat shatterings of the Fall.
I just went and read the new article on the ASL website and the scouts consensus is that he doesnt great range and SS but is adequate. Thats how I feel about him at 2B, he is not going to have great range at 2B , he is not QUICK, because he is bulky. I mean he probably has 1 percent body fat but hes still not going to have great range. Still he can put up great fantasy numbers at 2B so that is probably what most people on this site are concerned about.
I dont think he could possibly play SS. I think he looks alot bigger than his reported size. He is very strong bulk wise, that is for sure, and I just see problems with him making plays on a consistent basis. He will be solid. I mean if Kapler could be adequate at 2B he would have been playing every single day and not in a platoon.
Posted by: dbacks2008 | November 24, 2008 at 11:11 PM
Honestly the first time I saw him come to the plate , he looked like he was doing it for the first time. His body language didnt seem routine, of course that is based off of the comparisons to the other players. That must have been why. Is this the first time hes been using Wood Bats!
Hes just got this big wide stiff muscular stance , hes going to be hitting to the opposite field.
Posted by: dbacks2008 | November 24, 2008 at 11:23 PM
My bad studio. It appears i should have directed my ire at the poster above you. I was just scanning the thread and your post jumped out at me. The part that makes me look double stupid is I distinctly remember looking around to see if it was sarcasm and not finding it. Too bad it was obvious if I had merely read the above post more carefully. Long story short turns out I could not agree more with everything you said.
Posted by: walkoffblast | November 25, 2008 at 12:05 AM
the braves should forget about peavy, forget about furcal and sign CC and keep yunel. Braves fans would u rather have CC and yunel at 25 mil per or peavy and furcal at the same price next year and peavys contract steadily increasing??? i know id go wit CC and yunel. All the braves need is one starting pitcher and a LF for 2010. Sign CC and trade for dye. 2010
1.CC
2.Huddy
3.JJ
4.Hanson
5.Morton/Campillo/Tazawa(if they can pry him from boston)
1.Shafer
2.Yunel
3.Chip
4.Dye
5.Mac
6.Kelly
7.French
8.Kotchman
I would kill to see that lineup on the field in 2010 with heyward on his way....
What you all think???
Posted by: chipperowns10 | November 25, 2008 at 12:25 AM
Could Yunel play 2B? Pushing KJ to LF if Furcal is signed. Interesting thought.
1.Furcal
2.Escobar
3.Jones
4.McCann
5.Johnson
6.Kotchman
7.Francouer
8.Schafer/Anderson/Blanco/(Edmonds or Kotsay?)
btw, chipperowns10, Hudson won't be pitching next year - Tommy John.
Posted by: WestCoastBias | November 25, 2008 at 12:43 AM
If things (finally) go right for ATL, a back-end bullpen of Smoltz, Soriano, Gonzalez, Moylan could be dominant.
And I'd work hard for a rotation of Lowe, Jurrjens, Garland, Morton, Campillo with Jo-Jo, James and more importantly Hanson sharpening up in AAA.
Posted by: WestCoastBias | November 25, 2008 at 12:48 AM
WestCoastBias you know thats honestly not a bad plan for the Bravos. It doesnt appear that the Braves are interested in offering Burnett a long-term 5 yr deal. I think we are going to have to over-pay to get Lowe but I hope we can get him. Garland would def. be a nice fit. I would like to see Hanson as a five.
Posted by: ChiefTomahawk | November 25, 2008 at 06:30 AM
WestCoastBias I want the Braves to get Ibanez. But moving KJ to LF is a brilliant IDEA.
Posted by: ChiefTomahawk | November 25, 2008 at 06:31 AM