« Cafardo's Latest: Lowe, Lowell, Dye, Saltalamacchia |
Main
| Week in Review: 11/23 - 11/29 »
By Nat Boyle [November 30, 2008 at 1:02pm CST]
John Perrotto of Baseball Prospectus has his Sunday article up. Let's go through it:
- The Angels may be willing to match the Yankees $140MM offer to CC Sabathia. They won't offer 10 years to Mark Teixeira. If they can't land Teixeira, they will consider Pat Burrell for first base.
- A.J. Burnett is looking at the Blue Jays, Red Sox, Yankees, Braves, Orioles, and Phillies.
- The Twins want a left-side infielder for Delmon Young, so they can open a spot for Denard Span in the starting lineup.
- The Tigers are pursuing Jack Wilson from the Pirates and Matt Treanor from the Marlins. They are also putting high priority on signing Joe Beimel who's getting interest from a number of teams.
- The Dodgers will not re-sign Rafael Furcal for health reasons so the Giants, Athletics, and Reds are his most likely destinations.
- The Cubs will need to offer more than Jason Marquis to the Royals for David DeJesus. If they can't get it done, they'd sign Raul Ibanez over Bobby Abreu.
- The Braves are interested in Javier Vazquez and Jermaine Dye...
- The Reds need to offer more than Homer Bailey to get Dye.
- The Mets are considering Jon Garland, Vazquez, Edwin Jackson, Andy Sonnanstine. The Rays want more than Aaron Heilman for either of their starters.
- The Mets could soon become suitors for Manny Ramirez.
- The Brewers could soon become suitors for Francisco Rodriguez.
- The Astros are targeting Paul Bako and David Ross as backup catchers.
- The Rockies are trying to find lefthanders, eyeing Alan Embree, Will Ohman, Brian Shouse, and Glendon Rusch.
that's not from sunday, it's from wednesday.
Posted by: larry | November 30, 2008 at 01:07 PM
Teixeira will be a yankee.
Posted by: yanks12025 | November 30, 2008 at 01:07 PM
Teixeira will not be a yankee. He will be in an Angel or Red Sox uniform next season.
Posted by: wisbrave | November 30, 2008 at 01:13 PM
keep telling yourself that yanks12025.
Posted by: bjsguess | November 30, 2008 at 01:14 PM
It is interesting that the Angels will effectively "trade up" in the draft like an NFL team does if they sign Burrell and Tex goes to the Yankees. The Phillies would get the Angels' pick, which stands to be the last pick in the non-supplemental phase, while the Angels would get the Yankees pick, which is #26.
As for the Dodgers and Furcal, I still think they are morons on this one. The guy showed he was healthy despite tons of rust in the playoffs. Unless they have some secret medical report that no one else has, there is no reason not to resign him. Then again, we could all eat our words if they really have figured out Hu's vision problem and he cranks 15-20 HR and 40 2B.
Posted by: AA | November 30, 2008 at 01:15 PM
The yankees can offer more money.
Posted by: yanks12025 | November 30, 2008 at 01:16 PM
Manny Ramirez to the Mets makes perfect sense. Perfect. An OF of Manny/Beltran/Church is hands down one of the best in baseball. Flank the best CF in the game with a first ballot HOF in Manny.
I assume the Rays want MLB ready players for whichever pitcher they deal (most likely Jackson). Ryan Church doesn't hit lefties well enough to fill that need. But, I don't see much of a fit unless its something like Jackson for Ryan Church.
Say it again: Unless the Twins are getting really good value for Young, they shouldn't trade him.
I'd rather see the Brewers target Fuentes, he'll *probably* be cheaper. Or Kerry Wood. I like the Kerry Wood idea.
Posted by: melonis rex | November 30, 2008 at 01:16 PM
Please tell us your joking about this being one of the best outfield's in baseball "Manny/Beltran/ Church". The only good fielder is Beltran, manny is a bad outfielder. And i have not seen alot of Church.
Posted by: yanks12025 | November 30, 2008 at 01:19 PM
"The Cubs will need to offer more than Jason Marquis to the Royals for David DeJesus."
LOL wut? You mean, *gasp* the Cubs actually have to give up VALUE to get a productive outfielder locked up at below-market values?
Posted by: melonis rex | November 30, 2008 at 01:20 PM
yanks12025- Maybe not the best defensive OF: but overall OF production, they will be one of the best.
There isn't a good defensive OF available on the FA market. Abreu, Ibanez, Burrell, Dunn, and Manny are all butchers in the field. However, Manny's the best hitter out of that bunch.
And, the Mets OF defense will be better than the Yankees OF defense, to say the least.
Church will probably platoon with someone, and Tatis will probably see some starts in RF as well.
Posted by: melonis rex | November 30, 2008 at 01:23 PM
The Reds need to offer more than Homer Bailey to get Dye.
Duh.
Posted by: MPM | November 30, 2008 at 01:24 PM
"The Reds need to offer more than Homer Bailey to get Dye. "
No, they don't. If they do, Jocketty needs to back away from Dye.
Posted by: melonis rex | November 30, 2008 at 01:29 PM
Can Burrell even play 1st? Why wouldn't the Angels put Burrell in LF and have Morales play 1st?
Posted by: RAWbert | November 30, 2008 at 01:30 PM
melonis - given the Twins need for left side infield help, what would be an example of "really good value" for Young? I like Young a lot but think he is their most trade-able commodity.
Posted by: SpineyNorman | November 30, 2008 at 01:34 PM
"Can Burrell even play 1st? Why wouldn't the Angels put Burrell in LF and have Morales play 1st?"
1B is the least difficult position on the field. I'd think that a LF could play 1B, since it requires less agility and range than LF does. Either way, Burrell should be DHing though. He's a horrible defensive LF, and I don't think he'll be much better at 1B.
Posted by: melonis rex | November 30, 2008 at 01:35 PM
The Mets would be sick with Manny-- they would be an incredibly deep team (offensively, at least) in a real hurry. Manny/Beltran/Church with Fernando Tatis as the #4 guy and Endy Chavez as the defensive sub is an outstanding outfield. Use Daniel Murphy as a supersub, occasionally starting in LF and spelling Delgado at 1B and Wright at 3B from time to time.
Obviously the bullpen is still going to need work, but we all know how Omar loves the big splash, and Manny would certainly be a big one.
Posted by: JK47 | November 30, 2008 at 01:36 PM
I think Brandon Wood for Young would be an interesting trade that could help both teams
Posted by: RAWbert | November 30, 2008 at 01:36 PM
The Angels are a defensive/pitching oriented team. If they were gonna sign a OF with poor defense why wouldnt they pursue Dunn. I think he has more of an upside.
Posted by: RAWbert | November 30, 2008 at 01:38 PM
"Please tell us your joking about this being one of the best outfield's in baseball "Manny/Beltran/ Church". The only good fielder is Beltran, manny is a bad outfielder. And i have not seen alot of Church."
Actually, Church is a premium defensive RF, one of the best in the NL (although there aren't a ton of good ones). Terrific routes, good speed, and a rocket quick release throwing arm. Its inconsistency with the bat that's held him back at times, but he has the ability to be a very good overall RF, he was arguably the Mets best position player before his second concussion in 2008.
Posted by: MEddler | November 30, 2008 at 01:44 PM
Marquis and Wells for DeJesus
Posted by: uww1 | November 30, 2008 at 01:45 PM
WOAH WOAH WOAH WOAH.
I'm certain the Twins would rather dump off Michael Cuddyer over Young, which is still not gonna happen. And I'm also certain that Denard Span has earned himself a spot in the starting lineup. We want to trade one of them so Gomez can get a spot. Span certainly outperformed Gomez last year in many fewer AB's.
Posted by: twinsfan | November 30, 2008 at 01:48 PM
Re: Twins need for a left-side IF...
Would Edwin Encarnacion (3b, Reds) for Delmon Young make sense for both teams?
Posted by: nckdmss | November 30, 2008 at 01:50 PM
Dye is a great hitter who makes all tho routine plays in the outfield. He is a better outfielder than Adam Dunn was so you would definitley see a upgrade. Homer Bailey is garbage.
Posted by: RexGrossman | November 30, 2008 at 01:51 PM
I like Jason Donald for Delmon Young a little more than Brandon Wood. That can also help both teams. I'm hoping that the Twins can move Delmon for a decent value this offseason. By far my least favorite player on my favorite team.
Posted by: kab21 | November 30, 2008 at 01:51 PM
Wasn't Burrell a 1B in the minors?
Posted by: XD23 | November 30, 2008 at 01:51 PM
Yanks12025 just wishes the Yankee$ could have an outfield like that. Too bad they're stuck with Damon and Melky!
Church is a great RF, he's got a cannon for an arm and he has good reactions to the ball. And I don't know if there's a better CF in baseball than Beltran. He is a complete 5-tool player. As for Manny, I'd love to see the Mets get him, but it probably won't happen. I'm totally fine with Tatis and Endy in left for a while until they call up Fernando Martinez.
Posted by: nymforlife | November 30, 2008 at 01:52 PM
The Mets only need to worry about there bullpen and they would win that division every year.
Posted by: RexGrossman | November 30, 2008 at 01:54 PM
RAWbert0 Both are prospects who have fallen out of favor. Except Young's got tons more upside than Wood. No deal.
SpineyNorman- I really can't think of any good ones involving 3B/SS off the top of my head, since there really aren't many non-rental 3B/SS that seem to be "available" on the trade market. I don't think the Twins will give up top prospects for rentals.
Posted by: melonis rex | November 30, 2008 at 01:54 PM
I just hope the Yanks don't increase their offer. CC is not worth more than that.
Posted by: DominicanYanks | November 30, 2008 at 01:56 PM
Cuddyer has very little trade value. He's signed at market prices for 2 yrs. He's coming off of injury and an otherwise horrible season. And he lacks the mythical upside of Delmon. yet I think over the next two season he'll perform at least as good if not better than Delmon. Delmon's upside is mythical and it's unlikely that he becomes better than an average offensive corner OF'er playing bad defense. Better to sell now while a team believes that his mythical upside is still there.
As for Edwin, his defense is so bad at 3B that he should be playing LF.
Posted by: kab21 | November 30, 2008 at 01:56 PM
twinsfan- I agree. If they can eat salary and dump Cuddyer on someone, that would be the ideal move.
Gomez could use a few ABs in AAA. I could see Gomez starting the season off in AAA. His defense is top notch, but his bat needs help.
Posted by: melonis rex | November 30, 2008 at 01:57 PM
So what's up with posting about 4 day old articles? I love this site, but if it's going to make a habit of posting about "old" news, I'm going to be sorely disappointed.
Posted by: Darin | November 30, 2008 at 02:02 PM
kab
Admit it! you really like the word mythical, don't you.
Posted by: SpineyNorman | November 30, 2008 at 02:07 PM
Brandon Wood and Jason Donald can't combine to equal Delmon Young.
And yes I know, which is why I see us keeping Cuddyer- because no one wants the guy. He can still produce though hitting behind Mauer and Morneau.
I pray to God we keep Delmon. He's gonna be a stud someday, but then again if we could get a superstar shortstop then we might HAVE to do it.
Posted by: twinsfan | November 30, 2008 at 02:14 PM
Besides does Donald even have ML service time yet? He's worth a lot less than Young.
Posted by: twinsfan | November 30, 2008 at 02:15 PM
I really question why people think that Damon is a bad player. He definetly isn't as fast in CF as he was 5 years ago and his arm is a noodle but he's still one of the best lead off hitters in baseball and a decent LF. Look at his 3 year avg since being a Yank:
103 runs
160 hits
30 doubles
4 triples
18 hrs
71 rbis
66 walks
27 sb
.362 obp
.286 bavg
4/52 mil? I don't see the knock on him? And last year showed he still has something in the tank:
.303 avg/.375 obp/17 hrs/71 rbis as a lead off guy and 29 out of 37 stolen bases.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | November 30, 2008 at 02:25 PM
I don't think the Giants are going to sign Furcal. I think they are waiting for Tigers to decline arbitration then sign Renteria.
Posted by: 55saveslives | November 30, 2008 at 02:33 PM
who in addition to heilman would the mets have to give to get edwin jackson?
Posted by: krazymetsfan24 | November 30, 2008 at 02:44 PM
I don't think Damon is a bad investment, but a LF who only posts an OPS+ of around 115 simply isn't worth nearly what Damon is making. That's also leaving aside the terrible season he had in 2007. He's definitely valuable and his contract doesn't hamper a team like the Yanks, but if he were on a small to mid market team that contract would be a pretty big burden for return.
Posted by: nixa37 | November 30, 2008 at 02:45 PM
krazymetsfan24,
I would imagine it would have to be something pretty significant. I don't know the Mets farm system that well, but I'd imagine it would take one of their better position prospects (obviously excluding F-Mart) that is interesting to the Rays.
Posted by: nixa37 | November 30, 2008 at 02:47 PM
XD23 - Yes, Burrell played 1B and OF in the minors. Not sure how he would do playing there now, but it would probably be better than he is in left. Also, this has been mentioned before, but Burrell hates DH. I think it would take a lot (or at least a couple of years) to convince him to DH.
What would the Phillies need to give up for Dye? I'm not crazy about them giving up much to get him at this point.
Posted by: PhillyPhan6 | November 30, 2008 at 02:51 PM
"I pray to God we keep Delmon. He's gonna be a stud someday, but then again if we could get a superstar shortstop then we might HAVE to do it."
===========================
Superstar Shortstop for Delmon Young? Fat chance on that.
What about his .400 SLG % last year makes you think he's worth that? Speaking of shortstops.. I think he hit about on par with a league average shortstop in 2008.
.290/.336/.405/.741 with 10 HRs in 575 ABs???
I think I'm with the guy that describes Young as having that "mythical upside".
Posted by: thr33niL | November 30, 2008 at 02:55 PM
do you think heilman and carp is enough, not enough, or to much for jackson?
Posted by: krazymetsfan24 | November 30, 2008 at 02:59 PM
yanks12025: "The yankees can offer more money."
Not more than the Red Sox. Even if they bring back Varitek with his (too high) 2008 salary, they are still down $35 million from last year. You're not going to pay Tex more than ARod, are you?
Posted by: Little Bear | November 30, 2008 at 02:59 PM
"who in addition to heilman would the mets have to give to get edwin jackson?"
Assuming Murphy is untouchable, Nick Evans makes sense. Heilman + Nick Evans for Jackson.
Damon isn't a bad investment. He just shouldn't be playing CF.
Posted by: melonis rex | November 30, 2008 at 03:00 PM
or maybe evans? the mets need to get jackson, i hate all the f.a. starting pitchers, except cc who the mets arent gonna get. also its very upsetting to hear how they wanna trade prospects for relievers, theres plenty of them in f.a.!
Posted by: krazymetsfan24 | November 30, 2008 at 03:03 PM
woops, i was a little late on that one
Posted by: krazymetsfan24 | November 30, 2008 at 03:03 PM
Little Bear- The Red Sox won't either. The Yankees can theoretically outbid anything the Red Sox could offer within reason. Neither will pay Teixeira as much as A-Rod though.
Posted by: melonis rex | November 30, 2008 at 03:03 PM
I see the Yankees as being the only team willing to go 10 years, so I think they'll end up with Tex. He is A-Rod "lite".
Posted by: rememberthecoop | November 30, 2008 at 03:08 PM
What was the asking price for Tex again? 10 years and how much per? I know it was know near Arod 10/250. Wasn't it around 10 years/180-200mil?
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | November 30, 2008 at 03:14 PM
"What was the asking price for Tex again? 10 years and how much per? I know it was know near Arod 10/250. Wasn't it around 10 years/180-200mil?"
I think it was 10/180-200, but I really doubt he gets that.
I don't think anyone offers 10 years. A-Rod is worth much, much more than Teixeira.
Posted by: melonis rex | November 30, 2008 at 03:18 PM
I could see the Yanks offering him 6/135. I think the days of 10 year contracts are over. The only other guys I can see getting those deals are Pujols when he comes a free agent at age 30 in 2010.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | November 30, 2008 at 03:29 PM
One major unknown for the Mets and the Yanks going into 2009 is how the news stadiums will affect play. If the ball flies out of the park, then you're looking for different kinds of players than you are if the ball doesn't carry.
And how will the dimensions affect defense? In Petco, AT&T and even Coors, the outfields are massive. It's suicidal if you don't have OF who can cover a lot of ground.
These factors won't stop the Yanks from spending whatever the Steinbrenners want, but they may look foolish if they acquire players who fit the old Yankee Stadium and the new one plays like a whole nother ballpark.
Posted by: ink-stained scribe | November 30, 2008 at 03:29 PM
Heilman and Evans/Carp may be enough for the Rays to consider a trade, but I don't know that it would beat offers that other teams interested in either SP might make.
Posted by: nixa37 | November 30, 2008 at 03:39 PM
Delmon's upside is mythical since he is an opposite field groundball hitting machine with bad defense. It's going to be tough to become a 30HR guy when you have a 2:1 GB:FB ratio (8th highest last year). And I don't think there will be a magic light that goes off in his head to suddenly start hitting FB's which can turn into HR's. He also doesn't like to walk which limits his OBP potential. So you have an average OBP with mediocre power with bad defense. Fantastic upside. Or should i say mythical.
What I see Delmon producing consistently is a .290/.345/.455/.800. And that might be generous.
As far as Jason Donald I think he can put up a .800 OPS while playing SS (compared to LF). Pretty much I think he can hit as well as Delmon while fulfilling the Twins biggest need at SS.
In addition Delmon has 4 yrs until FA while Jason Donald has 7 (assuming he starts the season at AAA).
Posted by: kab21 | November 30, 2008 at 03:40 PM
ink-stained scribe, you can't base you signings on your new stadium. I believe the dimension for the new Yankee Stadium are the same, but I have never heard of new players being affected by a new stadium. They might look follish? give me a break.
Posted by: DominicanYanks | November 30, 2008 at 03:42 PM
I could see the Yanks offering him 6/135. I think the days of 10 year contracts are over. The only other guys I can see getting those deals are Pujols when he comes a free agent at age 30 in 2010"
Never going to happen Pujols will never make it to free agency.....and if he does decline a contract extension Mo will more tan likely trade him....6 years at 135-140 range is ridiculous...around 22 million a year?....wow i hate to see what the first basemen in the N.L central would makeon the open market..(Pujols,Lee,Berkman) all 3 of those guys are far superior to Tex...kinda of scary to think about it
Posted by: El Hombre_5 | November 30, 2008 at 04:04 PM
tex would be insulted to be called arod"lite"
he actually gets hits after the 6th inning and in close games... and is a good clubhouse guy that teammates speak highly of...
the yanks could throw alot of $ around and show they havent learned anything in the last 8 yrs...
Posted by: UpstateNYSOXfan | November 30, 2008 at 04:17 PM
"wow i hate to see what the first basemen in the N.L central would makeon the open market..(Pujols,Lee,Berkman) all 3 of those guys are far superior to Tex...kinda of scary to think about it"
Derrick Lee is NOT superior to Teixeira. No way. Teixeira plays better defense and is a superior hitter.
No way Drayton McLane lets Berkman get on the FA market.
Pujols will be scary on the FA market, if he ever gets on it. I don't think Pujols will decline, as long as the Cardinals make a respectable and fair offer and actively try to keep him after the 2010 season.
Posted by: melonis rex | November 30, 2008 at 04:18 PM
Yeah well the Twins aren't looking at someone to play AAA this year, we want a PROVEN shortstop. So nix out Donald, guarentee you the Twins haven't even THOUGHT of him.
Young is only 22 years old and he's been able to hit for a pretty high average so far in his MLB career. I think you guys aren't giving him enough credit.
The guy just adjusted to a whole new team, new town, new atmosphere, new position, new stadium. Someone doesn't go from adjusting to being a Devil Ray (at the time) to being a Twin all that easy. Of course he had an ugly defensive season, but left field isn't his position anyways. You gotta give him time to adjust.
I'm not one to bring up the stats. Of course he hit a lot of weak ground balls, and didn't light up the power numbers like we all expected. But he's LEARNING. If the Twins had drafted him, he'd still be in the minors. He's hitting in BA's worst rated homer park and he just got to know a whole new franchise.
TIME IS OF AN ESSENCE PEOPLE!
Posted by: twinsfan | November 30, 2008 at 04:20 PM
I think to say (Pujols,Lee,Berkman)are far superior than Tex its kind of a little exaggerated. Pujols is better, but not by far. Lee? I'll rather have Tex and that is if I could have one of them, don't want to hear that Tex will make 20 plus a year and that is why Lee is better. Beckman, they both are really good, but Beckman has a history with getting injured.
Posted by: DominicanYanks | November 30, 2008 at 04:21 PM
I don't know what do people want the Yanks to do. They have holes to fill. What do you want them to do? sign Paul Byrd and Odalis Perez to fill the rotation? Yanks haven't learned anything from previous years. UpstateNYSOXfan, if you haven't noticed, the Yanks have learned to draft better, that is why their farm system has been getting better in the last 3 years.
Posted by: DominicanYanks | November 30, 2008 at 04:29 PM
Yeah, Tex gets seriously underrated by a lot of people. He ranked 7th in MLB in OBP, 11th in SLG, and 9th in OPS last season, while playing some of the best defense in the league at 1B (The Fielding Bible's voting has him 2nd at 1B). Seriously, people bring up Berkman, but Tex was far better in 2007 and his defense makes their performances in 2008 a virtual wash. Besides Teixeira doesn't turn 29 until early next season and seems likely to produce a 130-160 OPS+ with stellar defense for at least the next 6 or 7 years. That might not be worth his eventual contract, but I think his will probably end up less risky than CC's.
Posted by: nixa37 | November 30, 2008 at 04:38 PM
dominicanyanks,
the points you make are true and i'll retract my end statement.. i would just like to see them save a spot or two for some of the young players.. i had heard talk they might fill ALL the hole with FA...
and i say the same for my BOSOX... i hate when they throw $$ at drews and lugos.. and i love to see the pedroias and lowries get a shot... just my opinion though and probably why no front office is calling me...
Posted by: UpstateNYSOXfan | November 30, 2008 at 04:40 PM
"...but Beckman has a history with getting injured" - DominicanYanks
Ugh. 1st, it's Berkman. 2nd, he has a history of getting hurt? You have to go all the way back to 2005 to find a season where Berkman hasn't played in at least 150 games. For Tex you only have to go back 2007. Infact, Berkman played in 2 more games than Tex last season.
Tex is a fine ballplayer by all means, but Berkman is better. When it boils down to it, Berkman will probably be either the best or 2nd best switch hitter in history. He's just stuck in Houston, which is always passed over in terms of relevance in the NL.
Posted by: Darin | November 30, 2008 at 04:41 PM
twinsfan- Thank you.
Most 22yo players would be in AA/AAA right now. Delmon was in the league at 20-21.
I do think he was brought up too early, because he was NOT dominating AAA when brought up, although he had torn up lower levels. This is another reminder as to why giving out Major League contracts to draft picks is stupid stupid stupid. His contract stipulated that he had to be in MLB in 2007, and, if I'm right, he's out of options because of that.
I don't think he's ever going to develop into a plus defender at either LF or RF, but I could see him really picking it up with that bat.
Posted by: melonis rex | November 30, 2008 at 04:46 PM
El Hombre:
Several players are already making more than 20 mil ++:
Arod
Miguel Cabrera
Jason GIambi (uggg)
And as for 1B Tes is already better than:
Carlos Lee= 6/100 (18.6 mil per 2009-2012)
Todd Helton (16 per, 19 mil in 2011 and 23 mil in 2012)
Richie Sexon- 15.5 mil in 2008
And he's a better overall player than Soriano (8/135), Vernon Wells (7/126) and (gulp) Derek Jeter (10/189).
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | November 30, 2008 at 04:50 PM
Little Bear commented on how the Yankees supposedly couldnt outbid the Redsox. He said that they had $35 million of freed up cash. Well here's a news flash for you. The Yankees have over 2 times as much spending money as the Red Sox do. If you want the Red Sox to get in a bidding war with the Yankees they wont win. The only reason the Red Sox might get Tex is because the Yankees have other priorities (pitching as everybody knows). But you can be certain the Yankees will be somewhat annoyed if the Angels swipe Sabathia from them and will probably put in an offer to Tex that will be on the verge of insane. Something probably near $25 million per year. My prediction: If Sabathia isnt in pinstripes, Burnett and Tex will be.
Posted by: Mason | November 30, 2008 at 04:52 PM
Who are the Dodgers offering for Jack Wilson?
Posted by: We Traded Rameriez For What? | November 30, 2008 at 04:54 PM
Wao I typed c instead of r, oo I'm so hurt. I just think the BeRkman is not far better than Tex.
Posted by: DominicanYanks | November 30, 2008 at 04:54 PM
Sorry I meant who are the Tigers offering for Jack Wilson?
Posted by: We Traded Rameriez For What? | November 30, 2008 at 04:54 PM
Darin,
I can't agree with you that Berkman is better than Teixiera.
Posted by: Apollo'08 | November 30, 2008 at 04:58 PM
What would it take for the tigers to get treanor and wilson?
Do they even have what it takes?
Posted by: pskip13 | November 30, 2008 at 05:05 PM
What do the Pirates and the Marlins want in return?
Posted by: pskip13 | November 30, 2008 at 05:05 PM
upstate wrote:
dominicanyanks,
the points you make are true and i'll retract my end statement.. i would just like to see them save a spot or two for some of the young players.. i had heard talk they might fill ALL the hole with FA...
and i say the same for my BOSOX... i hate when they throw $$ at drews and lugos.. and i love to see the pedroias and lowries get a shot... just my opinion though and probably why no front office is calling me...
______________________
The problem isn't spending big money on free agents. It's spending the wrong amount of money on the wrong free agents that's the problem. Lugo and Drew should not have been signed for the amount of money they were signed for. For all the talk about how bad a signing he was Damon's contract so far (4/52) was much better that JD Drews (5/70). People shouldn't have a problem with signing like Santana and CC's. They SHOULD absolutely have a problem with the contracts given to Zito (7/126), Schmidt (3/47), Silva (4/48) and Padilla (3/34),
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | November 30, 2008 at 05:10 PM
If the Pirates ate all of Wilson's salary.......
they could get an interesting return. Cale Iorg, maybe?
Posted by: melonis rex | November 30, 2008 at 05:10 PM
YFS78 is right. It's about spending on the RIGHT players.
You shouldn't be spending big on 1-2 win players. You shouldn't be spending on players who haven't shown dominance. If a player's stats have been declining for a few years, you shouldn't sign him.
And, trying to build your team through free agency is stupid stupid. Try to build your team through your farm system and trades, then fill the remaining holes through big-name free agency.
Posted by: melonis rex | November 30, 2008 at 05:15 PM
Darin,
What evidence is there that Berkman is better than Tex? In the past 4 seasons they were essentially even in 2005 and 2008, with Berkman being clearly better in 2006 and Tex being clearly better in 2007. Berkman is also 4 years older and therefore more likely to see a decline (less likely to see an increase) in his numbers.
Also, Berkman has absolutely no shot of being the best switch hitter ever. That's Mickey Mantle period, end of discussion. His numbers were as good as Berkman's in a far less hitter friendly age. Besides, I would never even consider Berkman in the discussion of best switch hitters ever because he is a switch hitter in name only. In reality, he is simply a lefthanded hitter who tries to limit his inability to hit lefties by batting right handed. Seriously, go check out his career splits as a RH (.270/.378/.423 w/ 34 HR). Compare that to Tex (.309/.393/.541 w/ 52 HR) and Chipper (.312/.398/.512 w/ 86 HR), who will almost certainly end up ahead of Berkman on any list of switch hitters.
Posted by: nixa37 | November 30, 2008 at 05:16 PM
Berkman career OPS - .973
Tex Career OPS - .919
That's a pretty significant difference. I'm not sure how any one can quantify the difference to show that Tex is infact better than Berkman.
People want to bag on Berkman playing only 132 games in 2005 because he hurt his knee in the offseason playing flag football, but Tex played in the same amount of games in 2007 because of strained quad.
Berkman doesn't have crazy home/road splits. His OPS has .002 points diffence split. Tex on the other hand has a pretty big dip on the road (.968 vs .869), which is mainly due to him getting play a large chunk of his games in Arlington.
Tex is a Gold Glove 1st baseman. Lance isn't, but he's pretty good, and vastly under rated. Furthermore, Berkman can go play either outfield corner, where I'm not sure Tex could do that.
Posted by: Darin | November 30, 2008 at 05:18 PM
If the twins need a infielder from the left side and put room for Denard Span, we should trade Delmon Young and maybe a triple a starting pitcher to the Padres for Kevin Kouzmanoff and Khalil Greene
Posted by: BIGPADRESFAN2009 | November 30, 2008 at 05:23 PM
Mason: "Little Bear commented on how the Yankees supposedly couldnt outbid the Redsox. He said that they had $35 million of freed up cash. Well here's a news flash for you. The Yankees have over 2 times as much spending money as the Red Sox do. If you want the Red Sox to get in a bidding war with the Yankees they wont win."
Now don't get all apoplectic on me. I said that the Red Sox could more than match Arod's salary (if they felt like it) and that the Yankees would not pay Tex more than Arod.
Yes, of course the Yankees *could* outbid the Red Sox if they wanted to give Tex $50 million per year. They're the Yankees. Of course they could. But they're not going to pay him more than Arod, so that argument is stupid.
Posted by: Little Bear | November 30, 2008 at 05:24 PM
Darin, I would still go with Tex. And we are talking about 1b, not what position they can play. The only thing a don't agree with you is where you say, "Berkman is far better than Tex", when they are pretty even, from the left side of course.
Posted by: DominicanYanks | November 30, 2008 at 05:27 PM
Assuming the Red Sox are able to keep Drew healthy for the playoffs (not a problem thus far), I'd take him with his contract over Damon in a heartbeat. Unlike Damon, who has regressed to an average to slightly above average LF, when healthy Drew is still one of the elite RF in the game. Excluding 2007, Drew's lowest OPS+ since 2003 (126) is significantly better than Damon's career best (118). The difference between the two is that Drew's was high-risk/high-reward, while Damon's was medium risk/low reward
Posted by: nixa37 | November 30, 2008 at 05:29 PM
nixia7,
I'll agree without a doubt Mantle's the best switch hitter of all times. No arguement here. I think Berkman has 3 more "peak" years left until he's going to start the down swing of his career and maybe has 6 to 8 years left total, if he decides to play that long. That said he does have a slight chance to top Mantle is HRs and a better chance to top him in RBIs. Their OPS is pretty close already.
Now as far as Tex goes, he still has a way to go. His OPS+ is 14 points lower than Berkman's. If you want to bring up LH/RH splits, well Berkman does have significant split between the 2. His LH split is around .150 points higher than Tex and 90 points higher than Chipper's. The RH split part of the arguement kind of becomes moot, because Berkman is so much better than those guys when batting LH. Sure they're basically "that" much better than Berkman when batting RH, but I'm not sure what you as a negative against Berkman here, because I mean as a RH hitter he's still got a .801 OPS. It's not like that is a terrible OPS....but compared to his absolutely dominant LH split...it does look a bit low.
I've already stated that Tex has a pretty significant Home/Road split and Chipper (as much as I like and respect the guy) hasn't had a healthy season in FIVE years.
Posted by: Darin | November 30, 2008 at 05:37 PM
The third mystery team is the reds it should be the orioles
Posted by: BIGPADRESFAN2009 | November 30, 2008 at 05:38 PM
Drew one of the Elite RF? Lol Damon and Drew are different kinds of players.
Posted by: DominicanYanks | November 30, 2008 at 05:38 PM
Darin,
Do you not understand that what Tex and Berkman have done in the past 4 years is far more relevant to the discussion of who is better right now than their stats from 2000-2004. I'll admit that Berkman was a far better player those 5 years than Teixeira was, but they are pretty even over the past 4 seasons. Considering Tex's age, I think that makes him a better bet over the next few years.
Also, to be clear, I wasn't saying that Tex will end up ahead of Berkman on the list of switch hitters (Berkman will probably have better career numbers), only that Chipper almost certainly will.
As for Arlington being the main reason for Tex's great numbers, maybe you should take a closer look at the numbers before you come to a sweeping conclusion like that. Tex put up his best 1.5 seasons playing his home games in Atlanta 1 season and Anaheim the other half season. Neither or those places is a hitter's park. In fact, Tex's OPS at home last season was 125 points higher than it was on the road. A lot of times people place too much emphasis on home/road splits. Many players simply play better at home than on the road, regardless of whether their home park is hitter or pitcher friendly.
Posted by: nixa37 | November 30, 2008 at 05:41 PM
how about this trade for the Twins:
Padres get:OF:Delmon Young, SP:Kevin Mulvey
for
Twins get:3B:Kevin Kouzmanoff, SS:Khalil Greene, RP:Kevin Cameron
Posted by: BIGPADRESFAN2009 | November 30, 2008 at 05:43 PM
How about one of the following trades-
Reds Get-
Delmon Young
Twins get
A: Encarnacion, Freel, Dorn, cash considerations
B: Encarnacion, Gonzales, Cash
C: Encarnacion, Roeneke, C+ or B- prospect
I think this helps both teams. Encarnacion could easily produce especially since Morneaue and Mauer will be on base quite a bit and he'll be able to drive them in.
Also...are the Reds actually in the Furcal running? he would be perfect..i'm not sure how he fits into our budget...if one of the above trades happened, or Arroyo was dealt...he could be accommodated for.
Posted by: GmblngPtchr20 | November 30, 2008 at 05:53 PM
Darin,
An .800 OPS is pretty bad for a 1B. Only 8 qualifying 1B last season were that bad.
The whole point is that Chipper and Tex are both .900+ OPS hitters against RHP and LHP. The whole point of being a switch hitter is that you don't have a disadvantage against LHP or RHP. Berkman has a huge weakness against LHP and its something teams can take advantage of late in games by going to LHP in their bullpen.
Also, your math on the differences between their LH and RH splits is way, way off. You obviously didn't look up any numbers or just made some ridiculous mistake. Berkman's OPS as a LH is 1.027, which is better than Chipper (.972) and Tex (.912), but only by 55 points and 115 points respectively, not even close to the 90 and 150 that you quote.
Posted by: nixa37 | November 30, 2008 at 05:56 PM
No, it looks like we're on the right track to getting Blake for 2 or 3 years. So no on Kouz.
btw, I wouldn't trade 4 years of DY for 1 year of Khalil Greene ... Young is way better than Greene.
Posted by: twinsfan | November 30, 2008 at 05:57 PM
"Drew one of the Elite RF? Lol Damon and Drew are different kinds of players."
Both are full time starters on the cripple team for sure and yeah.. Damon has no biz roaming around CF any longer for the Yanks, they probably should be trying to take care of his back as much as possible, but can't for the same reason that Drew is forced to roam the massive RF at fenway: nobody else available that can and makes too much money to trade.
Posted by: johns | November 30, 2008 at 05:58 PM
Like I said above, we don't need a 3B.
And we sure as heck don't need Encarnocion ... YUCK!
Posted by: twinsfan | November 30, 2008 at 05:58 PM
"Reds Get-
Delmon Young
Twins get
A: Encarnacion, Freel, Dorn, cash considerations
B: Encarnacion, Gonzales, Cash
C: Encarnacion, Roeneke, C+ or B- prospect"
The reds are never going to trade Encarnacion because he's a good player and if u make any of these deals who will be the third baseman for the Reds????
Posted by: BIGPADRESFAN2009 | November 30, 2008 at 06:04 PM
Yeah how ridiculous it was of me to call Drew an elite RF. He only posted a .927 OPS when healthy last season. Only Ludwick posted a better number. That's over 30 points better than what Nick Markakis posted last season. Vlad, Eithier, and Dye were all 40+ points worse. Those last 3, along with Ludwick, were all also considered worse defensively than Drew by the Fielding Bible voters.
Seriously, JD Drew has a career OPS of just under .900 as an above average defensive RF. Yeah, he gets hurt a lot, but when healthy there aren't many better at his position.
Posted by: nixa37 | November 30, 2008 at 06:06 PM
nixa37,
Tex had a career year, in his walk year. I get that. His Home OPS this season was 60 points higher than his career....due to his stint in LA (His Home OPS in ATL was in line with his career Home OPS). His Home OPS in ATL in 07 was .979, which isn't that much higher than his career. So forgive me, if I don't put all my stock in those 27 games that Teixeira played, at home, in LA this season where he posted an insane OPS around 1.200 something.
I'm not sure what your point is about the "what have you done for me lately" with Berkman and Tex, so all I can say is
Tex's OPS+s since 2004 - 131, 144, 126, 150, 151
Lance OPS+s over the same time - 159, 143, 163, 131, 159
You can draw your own conlusions, but I see Lance has 3 seasons better than Tex's best out of the last 5 seasons.
Posted by: Darin | November 30, 2008 at 06:10 PM
"You obviously didn't look up any numbers or just made some ridiculous mistake"
My bad, it was a mistake. I'm just hitting the "back" button alot on Baseball-reference while watching Pittsburg destroy New England and keeping up with both my fantasty teams. Lots of numbers flying around.
Posted by: Darin | November 30, 2008 at 06:14 PM
Darin,
Tex posted almost the exact same numbers in 2007 as he did in 2008, so it wasn't exactly a "career" year. Anaheim isn't a hitters park, so its really irrelevant that he played better there than he did elsewhere. The whole point is that Tex isn't a creation of Arlington. He has posted far better numbers since leaving, so that argument is just ridiculous.
As for the numbers you posted, Tex was 24 in the first season you quoted, while Berkman was already 28 and in his prime. He should have been better. I also don't consider Berkman's 2008 any better than Tex's because Tex is superior with the glove at this point. His defense makes up for Berkman's slight offensive advantage.
Posted by: nixa37 | November 30, 2008 at 06:19 PM
nixa,
You surely rate 1b defense much more highly that I do. I already agreed that Tex is better than Berkman in that regard, but it's not like Berkman's a butcher around the bag. Infact, he's rated 4th in the Plus/Minus system, behind Tex, Pujols, and Votto. There's a 25 point difference in Tex and Berkman's OPS and 8 points in OPS+, I'm not sure there's a big enough drop off in fielding ability between the two at arguably the least important defensive position, to justify that difference in production.
Obviously we are going to keep running around in cirlces here, so I'm going to bow out of this once you've said your part.
Posted by: Darin | November 30, 2008 at 06:28 PM
"It is funny watching yankees fans live in the last millenium."
The interesting thing is that I have never seen a Yankees fan have an intelligent response to this charge. Typically, they just resort to personal attacks.
Posted by: johnbuckformvp | November 30, 2008 at 06:29 PM