![]() |
|
|
| |
« Manny Is Dodgers' First Choice | Main | D'Backs Sign Snyder To Extension »
TUESDAY, 9:02am: ESPN's Buster Olney says the Dodgers and Mets "have kept the porch light on" in case some version of a Jones-Castillo swap can be made. He talked to a source who believes the Mets' chances of trading Castillo before the season are 50-50.
MONDAY, 8:12pm: MLB.com's Marty Noble heard from a person familiar with the discussions between the Mets and Dodgers that "nothing is ongoing and nothing is going to happen." The clubs had preliminary discussions about trading Jones for Castillo during the Winter Meetings, but nothing is in the works now.
3:50pm: According to ESPN's Buster Olney, the Dodgers and Mets have discussed an Andruw Jones trade. Jones is still owed $22.1MM, and the Dodgers are "highly motivated" to move him. Olney says it's unlikely the Dodgers would have interest in Luis Castillo, however. If the Mets wouldn't be sending a bad contract back, I'd imagine they'd want the Dodgers to pay approximately $20MM. Olney says the Mets would use Jones in right field - Ryan Church's position this year.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e2010536a3c281970c
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference No Andruw Jones Trade In The Works:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
Hahahahaha
Trade of the worst players in the league!
Posted by: bballrox4717 | December 29, 2008 at 03:53 PM
That's just sad. Has the hate on Castillo gone that far? Come on, he isnt worth 6.5m per, but he is better than replacement player, at least.
Posted by: viktor06 | December 29, 2008 at 03:53 PM
Haha Terrible Trade if it actually happens.. Andrew Jones is a real bady!
Posted by: Kulaid | December 29, 2008 at 03:54 PM
if andruw thought dodger fans were bad when he was hitting .189...
Posted by: Baleen | December 29, 2008 at 03:54 PM
What is the point of this trade for the Mets?
Posted by: BucSox | December 29, 2008 at 03:55 PM
if not Castillo, then who? Mets take on Jones' salary, then it's definitely Castillo that going... X
Posted by: ChiliGTC | December 29, 2008 at 03:55 PM
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!! I just died a little inside...
Posted by: metsobsessed | December 29, 2008 at 03:55 PM
Andrew Jones is BADDDD
Posted by: Kulaid | December 29, 2008 at 03:55 PM
Please, for the love of god, NO, NO, NO to that fat waste of space.
Posted by: Hyro | December 29, 2008 at 03:57 PM
Wait! Idea! The Mets take Jones off of LA's hands in exchange for free passage to Manny Ramirez. The Dodgers then sign Dunn as a replacement. Any chance that could be the case?
Posted by: metsobsessed | December 29, 2008 at 03:57 PM
haha you wish Metsobessed..nah i think that the mets are going to play Andrew Jones Every game. Have fun with him! Manny is not going to be a Met. Give it up.
Posted by: Kulaid | December 29, 2008 at 03:58 PM
Makes zero sense. Angel Pagan is better.
Posted by: Aduncaroo | December 29, 2008 at 03:59 PM
No, wait, Ned Colletti isn't even close to being that smart. Never mind...(Throws up all over keyboard). If I have to watch that man take a plate appearance in blue and orange, I will hunt down Jeff Wilpon down and slit his throat with a box cutter.
Posted by: metsobsessed | December 29, 2008 at 03:59 PM
BTW that was a lot of sarcasism!
Posted by: Kulaid | December 29, 2008 at 03:59 PM
What, that the Mets will play Jones every game? If he makes the team at all, he'll be a defensive replacement for Murphy/Tatis in the late innings. I doubt he'll get more than 100 ABs.
Posted by: metsobsessed | December 29, 2008 at 04:01 PM
I can see it happening. That would be great for the Dodgers.
If we could then sign Manny and Dunn and then trade Loney and Hu for Bedard and Carp, I'd be happy.
Posted by: dusto | December 29, 2008 at 04:02 PM
Bahahaha Mets fans were hoping they'd sign Manny, now they may get the worst player in the league.
Posted by: Scott Boras | December 29, 2008 at 04:03 PM
Dusto, no way the Dodgers trade Loney. He's one of your best young players. I love the guy. There's also no way the Dodgers are signing both Manny and Dunn. They'll probably get Manny, unless the Wilpons change their minds or Kenny Williams decides he wants him, and Dunn will end up with the Nationals.
Posted by: metsobsessed | December 29, 2008 at 04:04 PM
IF the Mets give up nothing of value and the Dodgers literally eat about $20MM then it's really a risk of little consequence for the Mets. I think the slim chance of Andruw rebounding to something close to his 2001-2006 self is worth $2MM plus organizational filler.
I just hope for Andruw's sake that Manuel has a quick hook with him when he's putting up a .210/.280/.375 line.
Posted by: Baleen | December 29, 2008 at 04:04 PM
Oh, this is just so gross. [Gasps for air amidst the smell of vomit] Ewwwwww...
Posted by: metsobsessed | December 29, 2008 at 04:05 PM
Baleen, there is a risk when getting Andruw Jones for free: he sucks major rear end. He'll lose us at least two games this year, which may be the difference between us and the Philthies.
Posted by: metsobsessed | December 29, 2008 at 04:06 PM
Based on the way Andruw played last year I would have been happy if the Dodgers released him. I just hope that if he is being swapped for another bad contract that its only for one year. Good luck Met fans this guy is one fat loser. I think the thing I hated most about him is the fact that every time he would strike out he would shake his head with a huge smile and laugh. Almost like he was saying "my god I suck this bad and they are still paying me this much money, I Love Baseball!" It made me sick to my stomach.
Posted by: cutmeibleedblue | December 29, 2008 at 04:07 PM
PLEEEEEEEEEEEEASE!!!! TAKE HIM!!!!
Posted by: dodgrdog88 | December 29, 2008 at 04:07 PM
Who the heck would the Dodgers get in return if it isn't a swap of bad contracts? Mets fans, do you guys have any idea who Minaya has on his list of "players-to-trade"?
Posted by: MrBlake14 | December 29, 2008 at 04:07 PM
He OPS +'ed 34 last year.
Posted by: Teetz1 | December 29, 2008 at 04:08 PM
This offseason is a complete failure if this happens and we do not sign two of the following: Manny Ramirez, Derek Lowe, Oliver Perez. We're still well behind Philadelphia in terms of team talent, even with Lowe in the fold. Throw in Andruw Jones...oh God...
Posted by: metsobsessed | December 29, 2008 at 04:08 PM
I wish Jones would get traded to the Mets, get motivated to actually try to get into good shape and possibly get another decent contract, and then go out and have a good year. What if the guy went out and batted .260/.340/.500 with 25-30 HR and good defense in right, because I loved the guy back in his prime. Watching his out of shape ass flail at pitches he clearly doesn't stand a chance of making good contact at is just pathetic.
Posted by: scribbletone | December 29, 2008 at 04:08 PM
"If we could then sign Manny and Dunn and then trade Loney and Hu for Bedard and Carp, I'd be happy." <~~~ Ahahaha @ this. Why on earth would you want to give up Loney??
Posted by: dodgrdog88 | December 29, 2008 at 04:09 PM
Bye Andruw....But this might not even be true
Posted by: dodgers67 | December 29, 2008 at 04:10 PM
If the Mets only paid $2MM or so of his deal, how is this not a decent upside play? For as disgusting as he's looked the last 2 seasons, he still hit 90 HRs over the 2 before that. If he sucks for a month or two, release him.
Posted by: Not Joe Morgan | December 29, 2008 at 04:10 PM
I'd actually rather keep Slappy then get Andruw Jones...wow if the Wilpons have a problem with Manny's attitude but not with Jones's they are either really cheap (which I doubt) or out of their ever-loving minds. You know what, this probably isn't even true. Olney is a Yankees-Red Sox shill. I don't really put much credibility into anything he says until I see Rosenthal or Heyman reporting it.
Posted by: metsobsessed | December 29, 2008 at 04:11 PM
metsobsessed - hence the comment about a quick hook if (ha!) he sucks.
I'm a Braves fan, and part of me would love nothing more than for the Mets to foolishly leave Andruw in RF all year to the tune of a .650 OPS. But I've lived that nightmare twice over: Andruw in '07 and Francoeur in '08.
*vomits*
I don't know that I could even wish that on the Mets :)
Posted by: Baleen | December 29, 2008 at 04:12 PM
Scribbletone, you're nuts. Absolutely nuts. Sorry man, I don't mean to demean you or anything, as I'm sure you're a pretty sane guy, but Andruw Jones epitomizes the phrase "sack of crap".
Posted by: metsobsessed | December 29, 2008 at 04:13 PM
"Makes zero sense. Angel Pagan is better."
No. No. No. There is really no part of baseball Pagan is good at. He is a good athlete, but he is one of the stupider players I have ever seen. Andruw Jones for 1 year for some loose change? Sign me up.
Posted by: nrmax88 | December 29, 2008 at 04:13 PM
Loney has way too much potential and value to give up for crap like Bedard and Carp.
Posted by: MrBlake14 | December 29, 2008 at 04:14 PM
if dodgers pay $20mm of his $22mm and ship him to metsland, not too bad for either team.
it's a shame billingsley won't have the courage to throw at the guy's chin when we face him.
that'd be one way to get rid of that stupid smug smile.
Posted by: mr.pink | December 29, 2008 at 04:14 PM
This makes no sense.. Jones will raise a stink if he does not start, so he's GOT to be starting, so even if the Dodgers pick up the entire tab he is an auto out in RF and overweight to boot, so just how much range has he lost affecting his range/defense as well? Mets are suppossed to be trying to win a pennant and instead opening up a fat farm? Is this some kind of New years joke?
Posted by: johns | December 29, 2008 at 04:14 PM
It doesn't even really make sense...Jones is due 22.1 million for next year (15 million next year, plus 2.1 bonus in 09, plus 5 million bonus in 10). Castillo's due 18 million over 3 years. As bad as Castillo was last year, Jones was worse. I mean, if you want to ask Andruw Jones to play the Endy Chavez role in 2009, he might be mildly useful (Albeit horribly overpaid), but that's about it.
I can't even come up with a reasonable Jones swap that I would be content with, since I would want them to eat Castillo's contract, AND eat much of the salary difference for 2009.
Posted by: AdropOFvenom | December 29, 2008 at 04:15 PM
"If we could then sign Manny and Dunn and then trade Loney and Hu for Bedard and Carp, I'd be happy." <~~~ Ahahaha @ this. Why on earth would you want to give up Loney??
Why do so many people love the guy so much? He's a good player but certainly not an untradeable commodity. I like him but he is only a good player.
If we could get a top of the line starter for him I'm all in. We need a starting pitcher right now and there really isn't a solid pick of the free agent group.
Posted by: dusto | December 29, 2008 at 04:16 PM
Julio Lugo for Andrew Jones still makes a ton of sense to me.
Posted by: Kramerica Industries | December 29, 2008 at 04:16 PM
Gives the mets someone to take their anger out on since Heilman is gone.
Posted by: GD31892 | December 29, 2008 at 04:17 PM
Once again, nrmax88 proves he is far too abrasive and unintelligent to even sound remotely knowledgeable. Andruw Jones is quite possibly the worst player in the major leagues. Why would you wish that on the Mets? Why? Do you even like the Mets?
Posted by: metsobsessed | December 29, 2008 at 04:17 PM
Metsobsessed talking about intelligence and knowledge? Yawn.
Posted by: nrmax88 | December 29, 2008 at 04:19 PM
Omar!!! Fat drunk and stupid is no way to go through life!
Walk away from the telephone! NOW!
Posted by: Desiree' | December 29, 2008 at 04:19 PM
I think this all leads to July 31st. Omar will realize that he doesn't really have an outfield (who really expects Murphy and Tatis to repeat 2008?), and he'll deal Brad Holt, Jefry Marte, and others to the A's for 2-3 months of Matt Holliday. That, as of now, appears to be the most realistic best case scenario.
Posted by: metsobsessed | December 29, 2008 at 04:19 PM
for the record, i think andruw's cooked. however, i also said edmonds was cooked when the cubs picked him up, and he turned out just fine. granted, we paid nothing for him so it's a different situation, but andruw is also 7 years younger than edmonds. you get the dodgers to pay a whole lot of that salary, could turn out ok. i wouldn't pay more than 2 mil for it, though, if i'm the mets.
Posted by: 100backeduptrucks | December 29, 2008 at 04:20 PM
If the Dodgers absorb as much salary as being reported there will be no reason for the Mets to not bench/cut him if he sucks. He probably will suck, but if he could somehow get back to a career-ish line of .260/.340/.460 it'd be a smart move for the Mets.
Andruw was one of my favorites as a kid, I hate to see him struggle. I don't know he'd do in NY though...
Posted by: Baleen | December 29, 2008 at 04:21 PM
Dude, what have I ever said to sound unintelligent. You didn't want K-Rod, and yet you want Pedro and Andruw Jones! Explain yourself, please, so that I might understand where you're coming from.
Posted by: metsobsessed | December 29, 2008 at 04:21 PM
"Scribbletone, you're nuts. Absolutely nuts. Sorry man, I don't mean to demean you or anything, as I'm sure you're a pretty sane guy, but Andruw Jones epitomizes the phrase "sack of crap".
I clearly said that I just wanted that all to happen, not that I expected any of it to happen.
Andruw Jones was a fun guy to watch when he was in his prime, and watching him last season was just brutal. A bounce back would be something I'd like to see, not that I expect it to happen.
Posted by: scribbletone | December 29, 2008 at 04:23 PM
I can see it happening. That would be great for the Dodgers.
If we could then sign Manny and Dunn and then trade Loney and Hu for Bedard and Carp, I'd be happy.
why would we trade hu for bedard? he is a canidate to be realeased and u want to give up hu. then u also want loney!? ur crazy
Posted by: lakersdodgersyankees4life | December 29, 2008 at 04:24 PM
That first period should be a "?".
Posted by: metsobsessed | December 29, 2008 at 04:24 PM
I think this would make a lot more sense for the Braves, as they would provide an environment where Jones would be comfortable, and would hopefully find him a lot more receptive to input on his swing. The fact is he is a great athlete and anyone who gets him will get a steal, considering LA will end up paying around 90% of his remaining salary. He will be better next year, that is unquestionable but how much better depends on the situation he ends up in. He needs to go somewhere relaxed (and NY doesn't fit that bill). As a braves fan they obviously made the right decision last off season, but considering our best outfielder is coming off his worst season and we literally have no one ready in the other two spots, it might be the right time to take that flier on Jones. And anybody who thinks he is the worst player in baseball might ought to think about the 10 gold gloves he has sitting on his shelf, and the fact that he is playing winter ball for the first time in 10 years.
Posted by: bravo84 | December 29, 2008 at 04:24 PM
Do the Mets want Church in LF or do they want him gone?
Posted by: Baleen | December 29, 2008 at 04:25 PM
"Wait! Idea! The Mets take Jones off of LA's hands in exchange for free passage to Manny Ramirez. The Dodgers then sign Dunn as a replacement. Any chance that could be the case?"
Uh, if anything, they'd be getting rid of Jones to make room for Manny.
Posted by: sampsonite168 | December 29, 2008 at 04:26 PM
I continually try to explain myself to you. You just are not very open minded. You want to sign whoever was awesome last year for all the money in the world. If the guy was bad last year, dump him. I cannot reasonably debate with that kind of logic. I am glad the Mets signed K-Rod. You, however were clamoring for Omar to go out and give him 5/75 on the first day of free agency. So, again, I will not waste time trying to explain myself to you. Been there, done that. Your opinion means nothing to me. You can continue to post all the stuff you want about how abrasive and unintelligent I am, I will continue to be amused by your stupidity. Deal?
Posted by: nrmax88 | December 29, 2008 at 04:26 PM
tyler - his line in '07 was only marginally better. Not saying that there wasn't/isn't something physically wrong with him, but he's gone from elite to below replacement level the past 2 seasons.
Posted by: Baleen | December 29, 2008 at 04:27 PM
The Mets should not do that it is absolutely moronic. But the real reason why I posted was I need fantasy baseball advice. I know it's not a fantasy site but I can still use it because so many people are here.
It is a keeper league and we keep 4. 3 position players and a P. So here it is:
BTY trades Albert Pujols, StL 1B to BushWackers
STEA trades Adrian Gonzalez, SD 1B to Better Than You
STEA trades Felix Hernandez, Sea SP to Better Than You
BTY trades Albert Pujols, StL 1B to Clear and Cream
BCC trades Geovany Soto, ChC C to Better Than You
BCC trades Matt Holliday, Oak LF to Better Thank You
I seriously like the one from BCC because instead of my keepers being Phillips Pujols Aram and Webb I would have Soto Holliday Aram and Webb. I am just worried about Holliday out of Coors Field.
The one from STEA origanliy offered me Gonalez and Longoria and I rejected it. And Longoria is better than Felix. (IMO) So I doubt that one.
Thoughts?
Posted by: Jason | December 29, 2008 at 04:27 PM
No, sampsonite, they get rid of Jones because they want to get rid of Jones. That also conveniently makes room for Dunn on their roster. My line of thinking was that the only way the Dodgers could trade Jones to the Mets and not get back Luis Castillo was if the Dodgers allowed the Mets to pursue Manny unopposed. That would then let them focus on Dunn. I know it's unlikely, but it was just a thought.
Posted by: metsobsessed | December 29, 2008 at 04:28 PM
"Dude, what have I ever said to sound unintelligent. You didn't want K-Rod, and yet you want Pedro and Andruw Jones! Explain yourself, please, so that I might understand where you're coming from."
I believe that nrmax didn't want K-Rod when the believed asking price was 4+ years and more far more money than he got. An argument of trying to build a bullpen with good depth, rather than simply spending huge on a one inning closer, was totally logical at the time. Who would know that Heilman, Chavez, Smith and low level prospects could land them Putz, Green and Reed. That seems like a great deal for New York. Now that bullpen looks set, and for cheaper than anyone could've previously imagined.
As for the Pedro and Jones buys, I get it. If they can land Jones for nothing and only have to pay him $1M, then that could potentially be a great low buy for them. Worse case scenario they just lose $1M, but that's not a big deal with them going into their stadium. I'm not saying he will (!!!), but Jones could very well bounce back and at least become a solid and productive player again. The guy hit 91 home runs in 2005-2006, and you don't do that by accident.
He's just trying to fill those holes more cheaply, and I'm assuming his preference would be to use the saved cash on Lowe, and possibly Orlando Hudson if they can rid themselves of Castillo somehow.
Posted by: scribbletone | December 29, 2008 at 04:29 PM
Nrmax, I was not. I said I would probably sign him for 4/56 at most. The fact that they got him for 3/37 is nothing short of a miracle. If you can find me a place where I said "I want K-Rod for 5/75 now!" then you win. But I never said that.
A little advice: I know you're probably in about 7th or 8th grade now, but in the real world, telling people you are amused by their alleged stupidity is not going to get you anywhere.
Posted by: metsobsessed | December 29, 2008 at 04:31 PM
Wow, if Omar thinks that Andruw is anything close to a reasonable substitute for Manny (or Dunn or Ryan Church, for that matter) the guy really is clueless.
Wow.
Posted by: ink-stained scribe | December 29, 2008 at 04:31 PM
Julio Lugo for Andrew Jones still makes a ton of sense to me.
__________________________________________________________
As a red sox fan, as sad as this sounds..would probably go through with that trade there. haha. Red Sox Need a fourth outfielder and Fenway is a hitter park!
Posted by: Kulaid | December 29, 2008 at 04:31 PM
And Lugo is just as terrible!
Posted by: Kulaid | December 29, 2008 at 04:32 PM
"He is a good athlete, but he is one of the stupider players I have ever seen."
I think it's written in the bylaws of mlbtr somewhere that you cannot call someone else stupid and use the word stupider at the same time, seeing as it isn't even a word.
Posted by: Jason F | December 29, 2008 at 04:32 PM
Scribbletone, thank you for explaining that in a clear, non-abrasive manner. You most certainly are not nuts.
Posted by: metsobsessed | December 29, 2008 at 04:33 PM
Hahahaha. Jason F, that's fantastic.
Posted by: metsobsessed | December 29, 2008 at 04:33 PM
Andruw is toast. He has been since the second half of 2006. Too many innings in CF on deteriorating knees and no interest in making adjustments at the plate when pitchers figured out that he would chase low-and-away breaking pitches.
Even at $1MM he's no bargain if he's taking plate appearances away from productive hitters.
Posted by: ink-stained scribe | December 29, 2008 at 04:33 PM
I just love the cheap, high upside opportunities. Pedro and Andruw are that. Especially Pedro. As a number 5 starter, Pedro carries almost no risk. People seem not to get that. For 1 or 2 million, I will take the chance that Andruw figures out what went wrong and rebounds somewhere close to what we were used to seeing from him. But it obviously is a better idea to trade prospects for Xavier Nady, who has never been anything more then a league average baseball player(but he is gritty and hard nosed, plus a fan favorite!), then it is to take on Andruw for free and see if he can find some of the elite level production he once had. Sigh. No risk here.
Posted by: nrmax88 | December 29, 2008 at 04:35 PM
Clearly no one here understands who owns the Dodgers. Or followed the three trades the Dodgers made during this past season. Colletti included great prospects in trades so that they wouldn't have to pay salary.
If you look at the post, it isn't the Dodgers saying they'd pay Andruw's salary. Olney presumes the Dodgers were be willing to eat salary to trade him. But that's not the Dodgers way. McCourt doesn't eat salary.
Posted by: DodgersBruin | December 29, 2008 at 04:37 PM
If nrmax is in 8th grade then I'm impressed. I'm not sure how much that counts though considering that I'm in 11th grade.
Posted by: scribbletone | December 29, 2008 at 04:38 PM
metsobsessed:
"The fact that they got him for 3/37 is nothing short of a miracle."
How is signing K-Rod for that much almost a miracle?
Posted by: Thirty5Thirty6 | December 29, 2008 at 04:38 PM
McCourt may not eat salary, but if he can dilute a one year hit over three years, I could see the deal from his standpoint.
As for the Mets, this deal only works as a precursor to signing Orlando Hudson. But does a FA pitcher and an extra $15 million of Jones add up to the significant upgrade at 2B?
Posted by: DG | December 29, 2008 at 04:41 PM
""He is a good athlete, but he is one of the stupider players I have ever seen."
I think it's written in the bylaws of mlbtr somewhere that you cannot call someone else stupid and use the word stupider at the same time, seeing as it isn't even a word."
Well, stupider is in the dictionary. Either way, I honestly don't care.
As for metsobessed, first of all, MLBTR is not the real world, it is an internet blog, second, how is calling me an 8th grade any more acceptable then me calling you stupid?
Posted by: nrmax88 | December 29, 2008 at 04:43 PM
He set the saves record and he's 26 years old? That enough reasoning? The guy is probably the fourth best closer in baseball, behind Mo, Nathan and Papelbon (Lidge is 5; one more year and he passes K-Rod and Pap).
Pedro and Jones both carry risk. Pedro could get hurt, forcing Niese into the rotation when he's not ready, and putting us in a big hole. Jones could take away at-bats from more productive hitters like Ryan Church and Daniel Murphy.
Posted by: metsobsessed | December 29, 2008 at 04:43 PM
I'm sure there are a few intelligent 8th graders out there.
Posted by: metsobsessed | December 29, 2008 at 04:44 PM
Just read on Metsblog: "I can see it now...Mid-July...Andruw Jones and Marlon Anderson battling it out to reach the Mendoza line." LOL!
Posted by: metsobsessed | December 29, 2008 at 04:45 PM
The Mets should definately DO THIS. If they can trade castillo for Jones straight up, they can platoon Church with either Tatis or Jones and have Murphy play second.
Let's say Jones, who was good enough to seek 18 mil a year last off-season, rebounds even remotely the Mets line-up would be sick:
V.S. Righties
Reyes
Murphy
Wright
Delgado
Beltran
Church
Jones
Catcher
Pitcher
V.S. Lefties:
Reyes
Murphy
Wright
Delgado
Beltran
Jones
Catcher
Tatis
If Jones rebounds fully:
Reyes
Murphy
Wright
Delgado
Jones
Beltran
Church/Tatis
Catcher
Posted by: nextdaytonmoore | December 29, 2008 at 04:46 PM
No, Pedro carries absolutely no risk. If you sign him, you bring in another veteran insurance policy, an idea that you conveniently don't respond to any time it comes up. You just said that Murphy and Tatis were a fluke, so how is it so bad if they lose some AB's?
Posted by: nrmax88 | December 29, 2008 at 04:46 PM
"I'm sure there are a few intelligent 8th graders out there."
YEAH! LIKE YOU!!!!!! HAHAHAHA!!
Sucker.
Posted by: scribbletone | December 29, 2008 at 04:48 PM
Zing!
Posted by: nrmax88 | December 29, 2008 at 04:48 PM
I'll tell ya why the Dodgers would move Loney; he doesn't profile well at first base.
First base and third base are impact positions, and your offense is severely hurt when the guys who fill those spots hit 13-18 HRs and post mid .450 slugging percentages. LA was fooled somehow into believing that Loney's first ventures in the bigs were more indicative of his power than his entire minor league line, where he didn't hit for power either. Playoff caliber teams have an impact bat (or more). Only two NL teams hit less HRs than the Dodgers, and if they want to improve the offense, they need to be open to ways of doing that.
The lack of power at first and third are the reason Manny is so needed.
Posted by: Devlsh | December 29, 2008 at 04:49 PM
You are using saves as a reason that paying K-Rod 3/37 "is nothing short of a miracle."
Really?
Saves?
Posted by: Thirty5Thirty6 | December 29, 2008 at 04:50 PM
What? Whatever...I'm tired of insulting people on a blog. I actually have a life. Sign Manny, sign Lowe, do not trade for Jones. Good bye.
Posted by: metsobsessed | December 29, 2008 at 04:51 PM
"What? Whatever...I'm tired of insulting people on a blog. I actually have a life. "
Yeah, yeah. Likely story.
Posted by: nrmax88 | December 29, 2008 at 04:52 PM
You'll be back in 20 minutes.
Posted by: nrmax88 | December 29, 2008 at 04:52 PM
"You are using saves as a reason that paying K-Rod 3/37 "is nothing short of a miracle."
Really?
Saves?"
And this guy is going around insulting the intelligence of others. Ironic, huh?
Posted by: nrmax88 | December 29, 2008 at 04:53 PM
I agree w/ Nrmax88:
Pedro would be the perfect fifth starter option for the Mets at 1-3 MM. If he gets hurt they can always promote Niese. Plus, it was only 2005 when Pedro posted a sub-3.00 ERA. I truly believe if he is fully healthy, which he hasn't been, he could be THAT Pedro one more year.
Posted by: nextdaytonmoore | December 29, 2008 at 04:53 PM
See like that wasn't even mean, considering I called him intelligent.
I'm just classy like that. I'll insult you, but at least you still got something going for ya.
Intelligence totally gets you chicks in eighth grade.
Posted by: scribbletone | December 29, 2008 at 04:55 PM
Exactly. And even in 05, he wasn't fully healthy, he was pitching with a partially torn rotator cuff. I would like to see what he can do while healthy, without any distractions, and playing for some redemption and for the way he will be remembered. Second year back from surgery = better command though, most importantly.
Posted by: nrmax88 | December 29, 2008 at 04:56 PM
2005 was a long time ago for a 39 year old pitcher who has had several surgeries since that time. I would be shocked if Pedro even gets anything more than a league minimum, incentive laced contract for more than one year.
Posted by: yanks09 | December 29, 2008 at 04:57 PM
I guess you could say that, although nothign at all has changed in his arsenal of pitches since then. Same pitches, same velocity (if not better), decreased command in 08, should be expected to improve. If Mike Mussina can re-invent himself like he did, then Pedro can certainly do it too. And for a couple mil, I will take that chance.
Posted by: nrmax88 | December 29, 2008 at 04:59 PM
tyler - I def. think there is a chance Andruw could rebound. How good of a chance, and to what extent, remains to be seen.
I personally think that while Andruw may never get back to where he was in his 02-06 prime, it wouldn't surprise me to see him hit for an OPS around .800 with 20-25 HRs.
I wouldn't take him for anything less than $4MM or so though, if I'm the Mets.
Posted by: Baleen | December 29, 2008 at 05:01 PM
"Intelligence totally gets you chicks in eighth grade."
Maybe, but some beer and some good bud also doesn't hurt. In 8th grade. Man. I miss 8th grade.
Posted by: nrmax88 | December 29, 2008 at 05:01 PM
Sweet.. If the Mets take Andruw, I will personally pay for a one-way economy airfare from LA to NY for him. Good riddance!
Posted by: richie | December 29, 2008 at 05:14 PM
i can not type "ha" enough to transfer to you people how i feel about this
Posted by: jedstylesux | December 29, 2008 at 05:17 PM
nrmax, I stand (amazingly) corrected. My apologies. I cannot believe "stupider" is actually in the dictionary. I know for a fact that when I was building a foundation for spelling and grammar that it definitely was not. Now, I am left wondering when it was added and why...
Posted by: Jason F | December 29, 2008 at 05:17 PM
Devlsh, Loney isn't going anywhere. If the Dodgers were so concerned about adding power to the corner infield positions, they wouldn't have signed Blake. Loney is an all around great player, who basically only lacks speed and power, but the lack of power is in part due to his approach at the plate.
Posted by: cheba63 | December 29, 2008 at 05:17 PM
I'm not going to bother reading the comments, I'm assuming at least 50 of the 90+ comments right now are ZOMG NOOOOOOO ANDRUW JONES SUXXX I'M GONNA SLIT MY WRISTS IF HE'S A MET type stuff. Let's get a few things straight, shall we.
1. If Andruw Jones is traded, it is pretty much a given that the Dodgers are eating almost all of his contract or taking back a really bad contract with similar money owed in return. The Dodgers need the roster spot to pursue someone of value. So, an Andruw-to the Mets trade will have ZERO, repeat, ZERO bearing on any other free agent signings, since the Mets will not be sinking any significant money into him. 1-2MM tops. The Dodgers are quintessentially releasing him, except maybe getting 1MM of salary relief in return.
2. This is what you call a buy low. We all remember the Richie Sexson Yankees experiment in '08, right. When he sucked, the Yanks released him, and they paid peanuts for him. Andruw Jones has a shitton of upside. Seriously. His 2007 season is valued at much more than 1-2MM when factoring in defense. Oh, and even in his dismal 2008, he played above average defense (albeit small sample sizes are in play here).
For a team with the payroll resources of the Mets, taking a gamble on Andruw Jones can't hurt. I wouldn't say the same about a team with stricter payroll constraints, but it can't hurt on the Mets.
Posted by: melonis rex | December 29, 2008 at 05:18 PM
If this trade is made I bet it opens the door for the mets signing orlando hudson. Does 2 things..... Fills void at 2nd and also Takes the heat off the mets for all the Manny talk> Its unfortunate but we cant afford him.
Posted by: MetsDaBest | December 29, 2008 at 05:23 PM
andruw jones will do fine here in ny if we get him hes gonna have a nice lil comeback of a season they should defintly get rid of casitllo and sign hudson or have murph dog play 2nd base
Posted by: johnnydollaz89 | December 29, 2008 at 05:29 PM