![]() |
|
|
| |
« Odds And Ends: Red Sox, Andruw, Roberts | Main | Olney on Moorad, Peavy, Hoffman »
SATURDAY, 11:23am: Buster Olney's sources tell him that Jones will receive the $15MM he's owed in 2009 over the next six seasons, without interest. Apparently the Dodgers are likely to call the Braves, Reds and Mets about potential trades. One source familiar with the discussions said it's virtually certain that the Mets won't be interested.
11:55pm: Bill Shaikin of the L.A. Times says the deal cuts Jones' 2009 salary to about $5MM. The Dodgers agreed to trade or release him; interested teams may prefer to wait for the latter. Shaikin says the Jones restructuring is independent of the Manny Ramirez situation.
7:51pm: Ken Gurnick of MLB.com reports that the Major League Players Association has approved the contract agreement, which will defer Jones' remaining salary. According to an industry source, Jones will either be traded or released before the start of spring training and perhaps sometime this month.
FRIDAY, 2:38pm: SI.com's Jon Heyman says the Dodgers and Jones have agreed to rework his contract to save the team $12MM in '09. Jones is likely to play for another team in the coming season.
THURSDAY, 9:55pm: As pointed out in the comments section below, Andruw's '09 salary could be deferred across several years and would thus gain interest, resulting in a higher total payout. That could work for both sides. A blog called Fantasy Sports Experience recalls a similar situation with the Mets and Bobby Bonilla in 2000.
9:40pm: Ken Gurnick of MLB.com has confirmed that Jones' contract is being reworked. It could be an extension or a deferred buyout.
9:00pm: I just spoke with Simers, who tells me that the Dodgers "would do the deal with Scott Boras." Jones' 2009 salary "would be reduced to make him attractive" to possible suitors in a trade. And the agreement would essentially free up money on the Dodgers' side that would head directly towards Ramirez, another Boras client. But it's still unclear why Jones would want to take the paycut. Is Boras going to pay the man out of his own pocket? This kind of dealing is unheard of in the sports world, but you can never doubt the almighty Scott Boras.
8:38pm: T.J. Simers of the L.A. Times has heard that the Dodgers are working on a deal to unload outfielder Andruw Jones.
Simers claims that the deal would save the team $12MM and "send the guy, who couldn't hit a thing, seeking employment elsewhere." Jones is in the final year of a two-year contract and is set to make around $15MM in '09. He's not just going to forfeit that money, so it's not exactly clear what kind of a "deal" the article is speaking of. A trade? Buyouts don't typically happen in baseball. Nonetheless, Simers is onto something and it appears the Dodgers are readying the cash to make an offer to Manny Ramirez.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e2010536a27bf3970b
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Dodgers Rework Andruw Jones Deal:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
The dodgers would have almost no need to trade for a position player, as their outfield will be set for the next half decade at least, and the infield is set for at least the next 2 years and maybe 3.
That is, of course, if we get manny. If not, we could trade for another outfielder (i would imagine a free agent would be signed instead), but trading for a starting pitcher either as a prospect or mlb ready pitcher is the most likely thing to happen in a non-jones trade.
Posted by: Ivdown | January 03, 2009 at 12:56 PM
the braves could use his defensive ability back, and maybe he will turn his career around and hit better. Besides hes better than nothing for the braves, because i think frank wren has just decided to let his franchise suck one more year.
Posted by: tmac2 | January 03, 2009 at 12:58 PM
So who would be your LF right now? Pierre?
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | January 03, 2009 at 01:01 PM
If we dont sign an outfielder, then pierre would most likely get the starting job without a trade. But seeing as the 2 leadoff hitters has failed the last 2 years when both furcal and pierre were healthy, I really dont see it happening.
Posted by: Ivdown | January 03, 2009 at 01:06 PM
are there any other dodger fans out there who don't understand the logic of letting the whole world know that if you don't trade fatty, you're going to release him? how do they expect to get anything?! i'm stoked we've restructured, but flummoxed about their strategy to move him...
Posted by: mr.pink | January 03, 2009 at 01:06 PM
The funny thing is, I can't think of a team that would want Jones even if he was free. All he would be doing is blocking players that can still play the game.
Posted by: A | January 03, 2009 at 01:07 PM
Reds are looking for a young SS prospect.
Hu and Jones with the Reds picking up all of Jones new salary for say Darryl Thompson and a couple of B or C level guys.
Not a fan of Jones at all, but I would do this to get another option at SS.
Posted by: schellis | January 03, 2009 at 01:10 PM
"are there any other dodger fans out there who don't understand the logic of letting the whole world know that if you don't trade fatty, you're going to release him? how do they expect to get anything?! i'm stoked we've restructured, but flummoxed about their strategy to move him..."
It could be a call to act now for teams that are playing around with the numerous free agents out there. Act before someone else does.
I'd like him on the Yanks. I imaginbe the Red Sox are also looking into it (Ellsbury is extremely one dimensional and Ortiz and Lowell may be hurt).
Not going to get a bidding war but might get one to jump up.
Posted by: NJYankeeFan | January 03, 2009 at 01:11 PM
are there any other dodger fans out there who don't understand the logic of letting the whole world know that if you don't trade fatty, you're going to release him? how do they expect to get anything?! i'm stoked we've restructured, but flummoxed about their strategy to move him...
Posted by: mr.pink | January 03, 2009 at 01:06 PM
Id be fine releasing him, but I dont think a trade is totally out of the question. Obviously its not going to be for a great prospect, but a reclaimation project player could be had.
Posted by: Ivdown | January 03, 2009 at 01:14 PM
"Hu is now a trade chip, hard to think why not with Raffy locked up Ivan DeJesus in wait."
Ivan DeJesus is also a trade chip. Furcal is signed for 3 years. DeJesus will probably be up in the bigs in 2010, when Furcal still has 2 more years. DeJesus will be traded, as you just don't let DeJesus rot in the minors till 2012.
Posted by: melonis rex | January 03, 2009 at 01:14 PM
Ellsbury has some skills and is definately not one dimensional.
Kid has some very good speed, has some power, needs to up his OBP but he was better at that in the minors so he may improve there.
Now a one dimensional "leadoff" type hitter is Taveras.
If the Red Sox benched Ellsbury to start Jones I'm sure there would be plenty of fans ticked by this.
Posted by: schellis | January 03, 2009 at 01:16 PM
"are there any other dodger fans out there who don't understand the logic of letting the whole world know that if you don't trade fatty, you're going to release him? how do they expect to get anything?! i'm stoked we've restructured, but flummoxed about their strategy to move him... "
Not really.
It's a call to action, especially for the AL teams. There are quite a few teams, I would think, that wouldn't mind carrying Jones as a 5th OF at the league minimum. If he's released and you're at the back of the waiver chain. This is also still an opportunity to move a bad contract.
Chances are slim that a trade gets done, but its not entirely stupid that everyone knows Andruw will either be traded or released.
Posted by: melonis rex | January 03, 2009 at 01:17 PM
"If the Red Sox benched Ellsbury to start Jones I'm sure there would be plenty of fans ticked by this."
I agree.
The Red Sox will never bench Ellsbury to start Jones. Never. Unless Ellsbury was REALLY struggling (like, sub-.700 OPS, sub-.300 OBP type struggling) and Jones was on a mad rebound tear, it won't happen. And even then, I doubt it would happen.
Andruw Jones won't start on the Sox unless someone is hurt.
Posted by: melonis rex | January 03, 2009 at 01:22 PM
1 - As a Boston fan I would love for the Yankees to make themselves worse by swapping any person on their team for Jones.
2 - This isn't the NFL, there is no reason Jones should not get interest on the deferment. Basically he is giving the Dodgers an interest free loan.
The Yankees are going to be the start of the opt-out clause craze. This hurts small market teams who will not be able to sign a long term contract with someone without an opt out.
Now the Dodgers and this crap. Jones is a learning example for the league about overspending and bad contracts. Now they have found a way to lessen the blow.
This is another reason there should be a salary cap. Jones' original contract would be counted towards the cap. They were ignorant and made a terrible signing. Deal with it.
Posted by: Theo Epstein | January 03, 2009 at 01:34 PM
If the Red Sox get Jones, I will put on a gorilla suit and walk right off my job.
Posted by: Theo Epstein | January 03, 2009 at 01:36 PM
I think Jones will find interest. It's all a matter of at what cost? The Dodger, under almost ever scenario will have to eat his entire contract. A team that may want to move to the head of the line and secure him w/o competition, might pony up a "suspect" just to get it done. Someone like a Jeff Karsten or Darrel Rasner type player. Guys who the Yanks gave up because they were expendable yet, warm bodies that you stick in AAA and bring up to fill in when needed.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | January 03, 2009 at 01:39 PM
1 - As a Boston fan I would love for the Yankees to make themselves worse by swapping any person on their team for Jones.
_______________________
Yanks would not give up anyone on the 40 man roster and I guarantee you the only way he makes it to the majors, is if he has an extremely good spring training showing.
_________________
2 - This isn't the NFL, there is no reason Jones should not get interest on the deferment. Basically he is giving the Dodgers an interest free loan.
________________________
Jones wants to re-establish his value. Making his contract more Dodger-friendly only helps him get out of there sooner. What's a few hundred thousand to a guy who's already earned 90 mil and could make several million more if he can return to his previous form?
_______________________
The Yankees are going to be the start of the opt-out clause craze. This hurts small market teams who will not be able to sign a long term contract with someone without an opt out.
________________________
Actually, the Dodgers were the first, that I know of, to offer a opt-out clause, and they did so with Drew, who opted out after only 2 years of 5/55 mil deal, and then somehow, after having a career year, Boras duped Boston into giving him 5/70 mil.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | January 03, 2009 at 01:47 PM
"But aside from Man-NY being an option do you think the Dodgers would see that as a fair trade? 1 year of Nady for Young and Hu I think is fair?"
Delwyn Young has shown an ability to hit in every level of the minor leagues. In 2007 he had 54 doubles. He had a .350 OBP every year in the minors except one. In September 2007 he had a great showing in 19 games (.166 OPS+). His major flaw has been his inability to defend. He was originally a 2B, but couldn't hack it defensively, thus forcing him to the OF. Since Nady is also a negative OF, it doesn't make sense to trade Young (who has more offensive talent than Nady) AND Hu for 1 year of Nady.
I believe Young is going to be an offensive force if given a chance. I wish he could have been adequate defensively at 2B where his value would have been tremendous. Sadly, I don't feel like the Dodgers will give him a chance, and he will end up being a pretty good LF/DH for some team like the Pirates or Royals. Either way, Delwyn Young is a better value than Nady, who is just average offensively.
Posted by: DodgersBruin | January 03, 2009 at 01:54 PM
"Ivan DeJesus is also a trade chip. Furcal is signed for 3 years. DeJesus will probably be up in the bigs in 2010, when Furcal still has 2 more years. DeJesus will be traded, as you just don't let DeJesus rot in the minors till 2012."
That's not true. DeJesus needs to spend at least the majority of 2009 in the minors. So let him spend the entire year there with Hu and Abreu as bench players (that is if Tony Abreu is healthy enough to play after missing the entire season last year). Then, the Dodgers can think of trading Hu in the 2009 off season if DeJesus has shown he is ready for the show. Then, let him work as part of a platoon with Blake DeWitt at 2B and as a replacement for Furcal on any days off at SS in 2010. It would then allow the Dodgers to choose between trading Furcal and his last season (or two with the option) and letting DeJesus take over SS full time in 2011 if he's ready and can make an impact. If he's not ready, you don't have to push him and make the team suffer. Seems like the Furcal signing is perfect for DeJesus to eventually be the Dodgers SS.
Posted by: DodgersBruin | January 03, 2009 at 02:00 PM
YanksFan,
I hope the Yankees get Jones, the Red Sox should give up a prospect just to get Jones on their roster.
The Dodgers could have traded Jones and paid all his salary anyway. He has the same exact trade value as he did before. Nothing.
Opt out clauses are a joke. Just sign a 3 year deal if you want an opt out after three years. Then you will be a free agent and can sign with the same team if you want to.
Posted by: Theo Epstein | January 03, 2009 at 02:03 PM
Theo Epstein, shouldnt you love opt out clauses? It got you the amazing JD Drew, didnt it?
Posted by: Ivdown | January 03, 2009 at 02:19 PM
I agree. With CC I think the Yanks read the situation as being his wife was not excited about NY vs a LA/SF option and in order to offer an out in case NY didn't fit CC & family they offered the opt out clause to get the deal done quickly. Notice they didn't do so for either AJ or Tex.
As for Dejesus, I don't know if I would keep at AAA for next 3 years. Furcal's got a limited no trade clause as it is and will be a 10 & 5 player in 2010. His 2012 option vests if he gets 600 PA in 2011. Not sure he would be so easy to move. Meanwhile, DeJesus has a high value now.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | January 03, 2009 at 02:33 PM
Drew's opt out clause had nothing to do with the Red Sox.
The Red Sox don't give out opt out or no trade clauses.
Drew isn't "amazing" but he has been pretty solid for the Sox. Not worth the money he is being paid but I wouldn't call it a terrible signing.
Posted by: Theo Epstein | January 03, 2009 at 02:45 PM
I wouldnt mind Jone come to Cincy
Posted by: Ryan | January 03, 2009 at 02:45 PM
If the Reds get Jones then they should also get Edmonds who would be a good veteran. Also they need a young sortstop and should get Hu.
Posted by: Ryan | January 03, 2009 at 02:50 PM
I wouldn't mind the Braves getting Andruw as long as it doesn't take any prospect of real consequence. He is still one of the better defensive CF in the game and there's always the chance he will rebound enough offensively to make him league average when defense is considered. Give him a month or two to show some sort of spark offensively and if its clear he's done there are plenty of other options available on the ball club.
Are people really still bringing up the JD Drew signing as if it was some terrible decision on Theo's part? Yeah, he was terrible in 2007, but it seems clear at this point that his performance that year was probably an aberration. He's still above average in RF defensively, and when he's healthy he's one of the better hitters at the position. The Red Sox have the resources to deal with an extended DL visit for Drew, so I think they're happy as long as he plays in 120-140 games and is ready come October.
Its actually interesting to take a look at the value fangraphs assign Drew versus what he's earned so far. Even in just 109 games last season, fangraphs has Drew as being worth over 20 million while he earned just 14. That brings his total value in the regular season to 25.6 million over the past 2 seasons, compared to 28 million in salary. When you take into account Drew's post season performance, I think you might even be able to say he's been worth the money so far.
Posted by: nixa37 | January 03, 2009 at 02:53 PM
Drew's opt out clause had nothing to do with the Red Sox.
The Red Sox don't give out opt out or no trade clauses.
Drew isn't "amazing" but he has been pretty solid for the Sox. Not worth the money he is being paid but I wouldn't call it a terrible signing.
Posted by: Theo Epstein | January 03, 2009 at 02:45 PM
His opt out clause had everything to do with the sox. They are, after all, the team that signed him just after he opted out to an obscene amount of money.
Posted by: Ivdown | January 03, 2009 at 02:55 PM
"Drew's opt out clause had nothing to do with the Red Sox.
The Red Sox don't give out opt out or no trade clauses."
Manny Ramirez had an NTC. JD Drew has a limited NTC (although its only 2 teams), Lowell has a NTC, Dice-K has a NTC.
Posted by: melonis rex | January 03, 2009 at 02:56 PM
"His opt out clause had everything to do with the sox. They are, after all, the team that signed him just after he opted out to an obscene amount of money."
Yeah, but the Sox didn't GIVE OUT the opt-out clause. I think that was Theo's point. The Red Sox don't give out opt out clauses.
Posted by: melonis rex | January 03, 2009 at 02:57 PM
Ellsbury has some skills and is definately not one dimensional.
Kid has some very good speed, has some power, needs to up his OBP but he was better at that in the minors so he may improve there.
Now a one dimensional "leadoff" type hitter is Taveras.
If the Red Sox benched Ellsbury to start Jones I'm sure there would be plenty of fans ticked by this.
Posted by: schellis | January 03, 2009 at 01:16 PM
Who is this?
.264 Avg .312 OBP .365 SLG .677 OPS
Give you a hint. He's a starting CF on a major NE team not in NY.
Posted by: NJYankeeFan | January 03, 2009 at 03:07 PM
The Red Sox don't offer no trade clauses to protect themselves...
Manny never had a no trade until he became a 10/5.
Drew's is so limited it doesn't hurt the Sox
Lowell is now a 10/5, the no trade would only be for his first year, so it really had no impact on the Sox except to protect from a sign and trade type deal.
Matsuzaka's had a lot to do with him coming over from over seas. This really has no impact on the Sox either because trading him to somewhere he didn't want to go would have been a PR nightmare, probably costing the Sox more in lost advertising revenue than what he is being paid.
Posted by: Theo Epstein | January 03, 2009 at 03:16 PM
NJYankeesFan,
Since when is NY part of New England?
Who is the Yankees CF?
Imagine how dominant the Sox would be if they spent another 75-90 million to equal the payroll of the Yankees!
Posted by: Theo Epstein | January 03, 2009 at 03:21 PM
North East not New England
At this point Swisher, Damon, Gardner or Cabrera. Or most likely some combo.
Don't plead poverty, and don't blame us that your CF is as bad as our 4th option.
Posted by: NJYankeeFan | January 03, 2009 at 03:23 PM
The Reds should do a deal that sends Andruw Jones and Ivan DeJesus (a good shortstop prospect)for Daryl Thompson and another decent prospect to go along with the deal. Also the Reds should get Edmonds and Sean Casey to add depth in the Reds roster. They need Mark Mulder as a backup lefty guy. Just incase Rhodes or Bray get injured.
Posted by: Ryan | January 03, 2009 at 03:34 PM
Poverty? Never said the Red Sox don't spend money, they just do it the right way.
Ellsbury makes 500k, your CF options make about 20 million.
Damon as a CF:
136AB, 28R, 9HR, 21RBI, 12SB
.294/.378/.529
1 Error
Melky as a CF:
397AB, 40R, 8HR, 35RBI, 9SB
.244/.297/.340
4 Errors
Swisher as a CF:
222AB, 47R, 11HR, 30RBI, 1SB
.243/.369/.432
4 Errors
Jacoby as a CF:
259AB, 49R, 6HR, 24RBI, 21SB
.301/.367/.467
0 Errors
So Jacoby is as bad as your 4th option. I don't think so buddy.
Posted by: Theo Epstein | January 03, 2009 at 03:44 PM
Defense guys, defense. Damon and Swisher are horrible CFers defensively.
Ellsbury is very good defensively.
I'm not saying Ellsbury is better than Damon/Swisher, but Damon/Swisher are not MUCH better than Ellsbury.
Posted by: melonis rex | January 03, 2009 at 04:01 PM
not sure where you got those numbers, njyankeefan, but i've got these for ellsbury (i just double checked them, but i could still be wrong)
.280 BA/9 HR/47 RBI/.336 OBP/.394 SLG/.730 OPS/50 steals, while playing amazing defense
i don't think that's so bad...certainly wouldn't be the yankees fourth option.
Posted by: ilikebaseball | January 03, 2009 at 04:14 PM
As a Braves fan, I know all too well how Andruw's work ethic and attitude effect his performance, but I'd still like to see him back in Atlanta, playing LF.
For the amount of money that it would cost the Braves ($2 or $3 million) I don't see much of a downside. If he struggles, platoon him with Matt Diaz. If he falls flat again, release him.
I think he needs to go to a team where he'd feel comfortable. Atlanta's the only place that makes any sense.
Frank Wren hasn't done much this off season, and while this wouldn't be a move to put the Braves over the top, it would potentially solve their LF and power hitting problems if Andruw could rebound to even half of his 2005 self.
Posted by: Clint C | January 03, 2009 at 04:20 PM
Ivan DeJesus isn't going anywhere; he's the long term answer at 2B for the Dodgers. Scouts have said he's a better fit there because he doesn't have a plus arm.
Posted by: Marcel | January 03, 2009 at 05:09 PM
"Are people really still bringing up the JD Drew signing as if it was some terrible decision on Theo's part? Yeah, he was terrible in 2007"
Well, in 2007 Drew was kind of the anti-ARod. He sucked all season and then got hot for the playoffs and World Series.
Posted by: Little Bear | January 03, 2009 at 05:19 PM
My numbers I posted for Ellsbury were road splits.
http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/players/splits?playerId=28637
He is good at knocking the ball off the monster and not much else.
In fact his road splits are very similar to Brett Gardner's September numbers (after a horrid first couple of weeks up).
http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/players/splits?playerId=29174
Both are similar. Slap hitters. Plus defense. Ellsbury just looks Ok due to his park.
Posted by: NJYankeeFan | January 03, 2009 at 05:40 PM
No matter where Jones goes (whether its a trade or he is released) you really have to hand it to Colletti. This is the first move I can remember (besides trading for Manny) that I completely agree with. I hope this is a sign of things to come with him cuz he is actually looking like a GM not and not a total bonehead.
Way to take it to Jones and Boras Colletti, I'm proud of you for the first time!
Posted by: cutmeibleedblue | January 03, 2009 at 05:53 PM
Clint C, and any fellow Braves fans thinking the team should take a chance on Andruw.
Please, get a grip.
Here's what David O'Brien looked up about Andruw's recent performance:
"Over the past two seasons, he’s hit .205 with 25 homers, 108 RBIs and a .297 OBP and .369 slugging percentage in 229 games, with 214 strikeouts and 97 walks in 781 at-bats.
And since his career really began to careen off the tracks just after the 2006 All-Star break, since July 21, 2006 to be exact, here’s what Andruw has done:
291 games, .209 average (208-for-993), 46 doubles, 46 homers, 149 RBI, .312 OBP, .401 slugging, 262 strikeouts, 137 walks, four stolen bases.
That’s 291 games with a .209 average, .312 OBP, .401 slugging. Find any player in baseball with worse numbers over that span in anything close to that many at-bats."
And as O'Brien said, whose spot on the 25-man roster are you going to give up for that kind of performance? Put Francoeur and Andruw in the lineup every day?
Again, please, get a grip!
Posted by: ink-stained scribe | January 03, 2009 at 05:59 PM
"Ivan DeJesus isn't going anywhere; he's the long term answer at 2B for the Dodgers. Scouts have said he's a better fit there because he doesn't have a plus arm."
I couldn't agree more. Hu is much more likely to be traded he will be virtually expendable if DeJesus is as good as we all expect him to be. Hu is starting to look like another LaRoche, a AAAA player who can't hit major league hitting.
Posted by: cutmeibleedblue | January 03, 2009 at 06:03 PM
Also as a Braves fan, I can only hope the Mets acquire Andruw. We need something to level the playing field, just a little.
Posted by: ink-stained scribe | January 03, 2009 at 06:18 PM
"My numbers I posted for Ellsbury were road splits.
http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/players/splits?playerId=28637
He is good at knocking the ball off the monster and not much else.
In fact his road splits are very similar to Brett Gardner's September numbers (after a horrid first couple of weeks up).
http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/players/splits?playerId=29174
Both are similar. Slap hitters. Plus defense. Ellsbury just looks Ok due to his park."
well, good for the red sox that they don't only play road games then, huh?
Posted by: ilikebaseball | January 03, 2009 at 06:40 PM
They do play 81 of them.
Posted by: NJYankeeFan | January 04, 2009 at 08:35 AM
Andruw sucks.He should be outright released.
Posted by: bleeddodgerblue | January 04, 2009 at 09:34 AM
HOPEFULLY NED IS STARTING TO GET HIS HEAD OUT OF U KNOW WHAT AND START IMPROVING THE TEAM.RESIGNING FURCAL AND BLAKE ARE DEFINITELY NOT GONNA CUT IT.
Posted by: bleeddodgerblue | January 04, 2009 at 09:43 AM
If the Braves take on Andrew, they should give him a minor league contract with the right to show up at spring trainning and see if he remembers how to hold a bat and actually hit the ball with it. No roster spot without earning it, like everyone else.
Posted by: Dorothy | January 04, 2009 at 10:19 AM
I can't see any downside to signing the guy this year. If he doesn't produce you only lose a couple million and you aren't on the hook for a multiyear deal. If he produces in a contract year- you reap the benefits. He is only 31- thats not old. Maybe its a mental or physical problem that will be taken care of by opening day.
Posted by: optionn | January 04, 2009 at 12:03 PM