« Renck On Redding, Fogg, Jennings |
Main
| Gammons On Varitek, Teixeira »
By Cork Gaines [January 7, 2009 at 5:13pm CST]
John Fay of the Cincinnati Enquirer has a few notes from Walt Jocketty...
- Jocketty has talked with Brian Cashman of the Yankees "a lot" and that the Yankees are looking to move either Nick Swisher or Xavier Nady.
- The Reds remain interested in Rocco Baldelli, but "probably not" Ty Wigginton, noting that the Reds plan on keeping Edwin Encarnacion.
- The Reds did not sign Jerry Hairston Jr to be the everyday shortstop, noting that Alex Gonzalez is progressing well from his injury.
C. Trent Rosecrans of AM1530 also spoke with Jocketty and has these notes to add...
- Jocketty says the Reds are not being handcuffed by the economy.
- Jocketty said that he had spoken with the Yankees "a couple of weeks ago" but not recently.
- Jocketty spoke with Baldelli's agent today speculating that Baldelli may prefer to stay in the American League.
- Jocketty would be fine going to camp with the group in place but that the Reds are still looking to upgrade the bench, preferably adding a player with some power.
Cork Gaines writes for RaysIndex.com and can be reached here.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e2010536b1d9e1970b
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Reds Rumors: Swisher, Nady, Baldelli:
just keep bronson arroyo out of brian cashman's brain and we can talk.
Posted by: jaydestro | January 07, 2009 at 05:22 PM
I'd rather move Nady than Swisher... I'd feel Nady would yield better in return. Plus the fact that Nady hits free agency after this coming season and he is a Boras client...
Posted by: Agent | January 07, 2009 at 05:34 PM
I say Nady for Homer Bailey straightup, go sign Adam Dunn to a contract around the same terms as Pat Burrell, done deal
Posted by: ARyan | January 07, 2009 at 05:38 PM
I agree about Arroyo...but have a really bad feeling about this.
Posted by: yankeegirl49 | January 07, 2009 at 05:38 PM
i think arroyo has to be in the deal for cashman
Posted by: YankPhan420 | January 07, 2009 at 05:38 PM
Why aren't the White Sox pursuing Baldelli? He can hit leadoff and play CF. He has an above .300 avg. from the leadoff position in his career and can be a possible 20/20 in the Cell
Posted by: Tough | January 07, 2009 at 05:41 PM
"i think arroyo has to be in the deal for cashman"
Then that deal wont get made..
Swisher as of 08 is worth maybe one decent prospect and a bullpen arm.
Posted by: 661dodgerblue | January 07, 2009 at 05:43 PM
Nady Plus Kennedy for Owings and Bailey? No idea if thats a fair trade just throwing it out there...
Posted by: The Italian Stallion | January 07, 2009 at 05:48 PM
Nady + what = Harang?
Posted by: GeneralManager | January 07, 2009 at 05:52 PM
God, I hope the Yanks aren't going after Arroyo. There's something I just don't like about him. I don't want to see either X or Nick gone, but I'd rather have Swisher in NY...I think he can become a mini-Giambi, but with a better glove.
Posted by: pdogg1079 | January 07, 2009 at 05:53 PM
"Nady + what = Harang?"
Hughes
Posted by: vtadave | January 07, 2009 at 05:55 PM
GeneralManager,
I don't think that the Yankees have the players that the Reds would want in return for Harang. He had a down year in 2008, but he's still viewed as the team's ace and won 16 games in 2006 and 2007. Unless the Reds can get a couple of fantastic young players for him, I don't believe that he'll be moved.
Posted by: AlphaZero | January 07, 2009 at 06:00 PM
I'd trade Arroyo for Swisher no problem.
Or I'd trade Homer Bailey plus a middling prospect for Swish.
Arroyo for Nady? Pass.
Posted by: PaulyOH | January 07, 2009 at 06:08 PM
frazier wont be traded for either swisher or nady. he and alonso and possibly soto are the 3 untouchables currently in the minors. how about a matt maloney and chris dickerson for nady or a maloney and sean henry for swisher
Posted by: redsfan | January 07, 2009 at 06:10 PM
If the Reds could get Swisher for Maloney and Henry I would laugh, and laugh some more. That would be a total steal. I think it would take more than that.
Posted by: PaulyOH | January 07, 2009 at 06:17 PM
I don't think Swisher/Nady will be traded unless the Yankees either get back a piece that improves the 09 roster, or a piece that they plan on flipping to another team, combined with a few of their prospects, that helps them in 09.
Having both Nady and Swisher is not a bad thing. If, for example Swish is on the bench, it allows Girardi to sit Matsui vs tough lefties and feature more RH batters. Also, injuries happen, I would much rather give those ABs to Swisher than to Juan Miranda or Justin Christian.
The Yanks are not tight for money and don't have to trade Nady/Swisher, so they are not taking two terrible prospects for one of them.
Posted by: Yewnork | January 07, 2009 at 06:27 PM
The yankees should trade nady for jonathon sanchez and end this talk
Posted by: hebrewhammer1989 | January 07, 2009 at 06:42 PM
Considering what the Yankees gave up to get Swisher I don't think Maloney or Thompson + a few parts is all that far off. They gave up a utility player and a couple of B level arms.
Maloney, a reliever, and someone like Henry should get it done. Swisher was horrible last year but the talent is there.
Nady I think is closer to the player he was in 07 then what he was in 08. I'd pass on him unless the Reds could get him cheap.
I think Arroyo is worth more then either after the dust settles, and there is no way I give up Bailey for either.
Unless the Yankees are willing to give up some serious young talent (Joba and Jackson along with Swisher) I wouldn't deal Harang. He's a ace caliber arm coming off a year where he pitched hurt, and he's signed to a team friendly contract.
Reds will move Arroyo and plug in one of their kids, yes the Reds are actually loaded up with young pitching, problem is now they can't hit.
Posted by: schellis | January 07, 2009 at 06:43 PM
nady hughes kennedy aceves and whoever else they want from the farm for jay bruce haha
Posted by: yanks09 | January 07, 2009 at 06:51 PM
nady, jackson, brackman, and kennedy should get that deal done
Posted by: hebrewhammer1989 | January 07, 2009 at 06:54 PM
"Unless the Yankees are willing to give up some serious young talent (Joba and Jackson along with Swisher) I wouldn't deal Harang."
Are you joking? God I hope so.
Posted by: Yewnork | January 07, 2009 at 06:57 PM
Why would the Yanks even think about giving up Joba for Harang? Thats ridiculous to even mention.
"He's a ace caliber arm coming off a year where he pitched hurt, and he's signed to a team friendly contract."
And Joba is what???? Get rid of one ace caliber arm who has already proven he can pitch in the AL East for another who hasnt? Who is also 7 years older? I dont think so.
Posted by: yankeegirl49 | January 07, 2009 at 06:59 PM
I love how people on both sides overvalue their players.
Any Reds trades for Joba are pure fantasy. Just like any Yankees trades for Bruce are pure fantasy. Neither will happen.
The Yankees stole Swisher from the White Sox. I don't think they're going to let anyone steal him from them.
I still think an Arroyo-Swisher deal could be fair.....or Bailey plus a minor leaguer or two for Swisher could work.
Posted by: PaulyOH | January 07, 2009 at 07:03 PM
Joba is untouchable. Unless Hanley is on the market I don't see any other player that could yield the kind of value Joba has.
Posted by: yanks09 | January 07, 2009 at 07:05 PM
PaulyOH I was joking around when I was talking about Bruce. Which is why I said Nady Hughes Kennedy Aceves and whoever else the Reds want. Certain players are untouchable....Bruce and Joba are 2 of them. Not because they are the best players in the game yet, but because they have the potential to become some of the best and because they are homegrown and give the fans something homegrown to get excited about. Who is the better SP...CC or Joba? CC. And who would I want if I had to make a choice between the two? Joba.
Posted by: yanks09 | January 07, 2009 at 07:08 PM
yankeegirl, age for pitchers is insignificant.
Harang got robbed of a Cy Young nod 2 years in a row because he layed for a crappy Reds team. The guy is 16+ wins and 230 K's a year with a 3.50 ERA - on average.
Harang's proven he can pitch against ANY team.
When Joba gets a few years under his belt...say 3-4 FULL major league seasons...then tell us he's a better ace than Aaron Harang.
Posted by: Rob Dicken | January 07, 2009 at 07:09 PM
Hearing Joba mentioned in a trade proposal usually gets a few blank stares, but what really makes me question the seriousness of that proposal is that Swisher and Jackson were also added.
Posted by: Hawkeye86 | January 07, 2009 at 07:13 PM
The Yanks' didn't steal anyone. Swisher is a .219 hitter.
Posted by: kdub | January 07, 2009 at 07:16 PM
Age is insignificant for pitchers???
3.50 ERA in the NL becomes 4.50 ERA in the AL. He hasnt proven anything to me.
Wait hang on, I think Sandy Koufax is available.
Posted by: yankeegirl49 | January 07, 2009 at 07:21 PM
PaulyOH...you are now one of my favorite people on here...you gave me some good laughs.
Values...
Swish- as has been mentioned...yanks gave up little to get him they will get little in return
Reality, the reds are in the drivers seat. Yanks have about 9 people for 5 positions all on large contracts...they aren't going to be getting any steals
Arroyo- his value will be slightly higher than Vazquez was. Similar numbers, but Vazquez has shown he can't be trusted in big games (he was left out of the rotation in the playoffs)...and Vazquez brought a significantly larger haul than these jokes you are throwing out there.
The Italian Stallion
Nady plus Kennedy for Owings and Bailey...nice try.
you couldn't get Owings and Bailey for Nady and Hughes. Hughes is similar to bailey value wise, and Owings wouldn't hold a candle to a year of Nady
Posted by: coltholt | January 07, 2009 at 07:22 PM
.219 batting average. Oh. Yes. Batting average is so important...
Even with that .219 batting average in a fluky bad season, Swisher had a higher OBP (.332) than the piece of trash the Reds signed (Taveras) to be their lead-off hitter.
Previous two seasons, Swish hit .254 and .262, and he walks a ton, hits for power, is a switch-hitter, and plays solid outfield defense.
Yankees absolutely stole him.
Posted by: PaulyOH | January 07, 2009 at 07:22 PM
Swisher had a terrible year but I still see the pitchers the Sox got in return having great potential. Cooper has taken NUMEROUS pitchers and turned them in to major league talents. Sox did not get ripped off; they did sell low however.
Posted by: Tough | January 07, 2009 at 07:24 PM
Swisher had a down year, every year before he was improving. .260, 30hr, 80walks isnt unreasonable- depending on playing time.
Why would the Reds give up guys for Nady/Swisher? Signing Wigginton and moving Edwin to LF would be better option
Posted by: Zack | January 07, 2009 at 07:32 PM
Swisher is horrible. He had a decent year in '05 but other than that he's sucked. Why would we trade Arroyo a 200+ inning workhorse for a .250-25hr-70rbi Outfielder? Dickerson could match those numbers....
The Reds would want Nady, a high average and high RBI guy. Swisher is atrocious with RISP, Nady is a .300 hitter.
Would Bailey for Nady trade be fair?
Posted by: Noggy | January 07, 2009 at 07:39 PM
"Swisher is atrocious with RISP, Nady is a .300 hitter."
dude seriously? .300 for nady? you're dreaming. how was '05 swishers best year? it was his worst year
Yankees dont want Bailey. They dont want prospects or young arms, they want proven MLB talent. specifically a CF who can hit and play defense, got any of those available?
Posted by: Zack | January 07, 2009 at 07:45 PM
"Matt Maloney and Chris Valaika should get it done for Nady"
No it wont
Posted by: Zack | January 07, 2009 at 07:49 PM
Nady also rarely walks and is coming off a career year, which was also the first time he's been healthy. Also, a switch-hitter is preferable to a right-handed hitter.
You can't call a guy a .300 hitter because he did it ONCE.
That said, I might do Bailey for Nady. I'd much rather have Swisher, but Nady is OK if the price is right.
Posted by: PaulyOH | January 07, 2009 at 07:49 PM
"Swish- as has been mentioned...yanks gave up little to get him they will get little in return
Reality, the reds are in the drivers seat. Yanks have about 9 people for 5 positions all on large contracts...they aren't going to be getting any steals"
Where is this logic coming from that since the Yankees got swisher for nothing that they have to get nothing in return. This is totally false. We got Swisher for nothing because he was incredibly unhappy with the Sox and they wanted to get rid of his 23 million owed.
The second part of that paragraph made me laugh out loud, literally. The red's are in the drivers seat???WHat are you smoking and can I have some of it. What makes you think that the yankees HAVE to trade one of these players. They can afford to keep him and since Matsui and DAmon are coming off the books next year I dont think they will trade Swisher unless they are blown away with something. Same thing with Nady.
Posted by: Dynasty26 | January 07, 2009 at 07:50 PM
Noggy....Dickerson is not a good hitter. He just was on a hot streak when he got called up. He strikes out a ton and chases pitches out of the zone which is why he got his first shot at age 26. His minor league numbers are nothing special and just got hot at the right time. The Reds are even confident he can play at any level at which he showed for a month last year for a full season which is why they are trying to find another outfielder.
Posted by: yanks09 | January 07, 2009 at 07:51 PM
I have to agree with Tough. Swisher was not kidnapped in the middle of the night during his sleep, the White Sox have to agree to the deal in order for it to go through. To the White Sox, what they got from the Yankees was equal in value or greater to them. The White Sox did not have a legitimate position for Swisher therefore his value was lower to them. This does not lower Swisher's overall value. Swisher is worth different values to different teams and likewise goes with the Yankees. If the Yankees do not recieve an offer with what they want for Swish, they won't trade him. The same goes for the Reds. The way people are talking, it seems like trading Swisher or Nady is mandatory and has to happen, it doesn't. In my personal opinion, the Yankees are in the driver's seat, there are a decent amount of teams that are interested in Nady or Swisher so if that team wants either one, they will have to put a decent offer on the table or not trade at all. It wouldn't burden the Yankees to have both Nady and Swisher at the start of the season, with the Yankees recent history of injuries, it wouldn't be a bad plan.
Posted by: Hawkeye86 | January 07, 2009 at 07:51 PM
"or Devin Mesoraco and Drew Stubbs for Nady"
that's a no too. didnt i say proven? we already have a speed cf coming from AAA in Gardner. And although Mesoraco seems like a good prospect, he wouldnt see the Bronx for probably 4 years, and we need a catcher to replace posada before then
Posted by: Zack | January 07, 2009 at 07:52 PM
PaulyOH I think he was referring to Nady's average with RISP....which is above .300 and usually is every year of his career.
Posted by: yanks09 | January 07, 2009 at 07:55 PM
Wilson Betemit, Jeff Marquez & Jhonny Nunez for Swisher was nothing. Betemit is what a bench player? Marquez is a low K guy but doesnt have great GB skills, Nunez was acquired for a back up SS.
Ozzie Guillen hated Swisher, thats why they traded him. Yankees have no reason to move Swisher. Matsui, Damon, Nady are all free agents after this year.
Posted by: Zack | January 07, 2009 at 07:56 PM
"yankees dont want MLB talent back Zack...they need to rebuild the farm...they aint taking on more salary"
how are you telling me what my team wants? rebuild the farm system? unless you have a proven CF or a Catcher who is mlb ready then you're not getting Nady
Posted by: Zack | January 07, 2009 at 07:59 PM
"Nady's average with RISP....which is above .300 and usually is every year of his career."
Nady career RISP .265
Posted by: Zack | January 07, 2009 at 08:00 PM
Nunez was actually a decent relief pitcher. The obvious, but not stated, reason the Yankees traded him was because he was not rule 5 protected and likely to be snatched.
Posted by: Hawkeye86 | January 07, 2009 at 08:04 PM
The Yanks got Swisher for cheaper than they would have if the Sox waited it out. Its understandable since nobody thought there would be a market for Swisher considering there are so many free agents available through free agency. Nobody wants to commit the money for big multi year deals right now though so Swisher is more attractive now. The Sox were desperate to get rid of Swisher though and did not want to risk the market for him weakening so jumped at the first decent offer.
You know how they say teams overplay their hands sometimes? Well this was a case of the Sox UNDERplaying their hand.
Posted by: yanks09 | January 07, 2009 at 08:05 PM
Zack....Nady hit .307 with RISP last year..... and .313 with RISP in 2007. Those were his only 2 full seasons. I would say he is a .300 hitter with runners in scoring position.
Posted by: yanks09 | January 07, 2009 at 08:08 PM
yanks 09
Wonder if the yanks can make a deal with:
E. Volquez or J. Cueto
z
Posted by: arod13 | January 07, 2009 at 08:13 PM
'08: 153ab, .307avg
"above .300 and usually is every year of his career"
'08: 153ab, .307avg
'07: 115ab, .313avg
'06: 121ab, .248avg
'05: 85 ab, .212avg
'03: 101ab, .218avg
so now a 'career' just equals the stats from his best two years?
nady had a career year last year, he'll go for .270, 28hr, 30bb, 120k this year
Posted by: Zack | January 07, 2009 at 08:15 PM
yanks 09
1. C. Sabathia
2. A. Burnett
3. C. Wang
4. E. Volquez/J. Cueto
5. J. Chamberlain
z
Posted by: arod13 | January 07, 2009 at 08:15 PM
u can have nady and swisher but give us b phillips back in the deal, then can send cano and pitching prospect for kemp and clear two spots so Manny can come dh!
Posted by: Taylor89 | January 07, 2009 at 08:15 PM
"Zach you have no idea what you talking about.The Yankees dont need to trade Nady or Swisher,but there looking to drop salary too add a 5th starter.since Andy is playing hardball"
Drop salary?!?! AHAHAHA, yeah that 400m spending spree really shows they're looking to cut salary.
And I said they dont need to make a deal, the only deal they would take is for a CF
Posted by: Zack | January 07, 2009 at 08:16 PM
Austin Jackson isnt coming til 2010, and thats IF he does good this year and does good next spring training.
Molina cant catch 100 games, can Posada throw, Montero is years away, Cervelli isnt going to be given the job.
Posted by: Zack | January 07, 2009 at 08:19 PM
The Yankees do not need to trade Swisher and Nady, and I don't expect them to. In case everyone forget, its a fairly good possibility that Matsui and/or Damon can break down along the year again. What do you do then? Too much depth is never a bad thing and unless someone offers a great package I see both Nady and Swisher in pinstripes next season. Competition is also never a bad thing either. Nady and Swish can compete for the RF job and keep each other on top of their games because if one slips the other is right there to take his spot in the lineup. Even if Nady plays the entire year in right and nobody gets injured I still see Swisher getting 400 AB's. Matsui and Damon have been injured alot the last 2 years and will get plenty of days off. He can play here and there at first base. Swish can also see some time in centerfield...I wouldn't want him there on a daily basis but he is capable of playing the position especially when Wang is pitching and the outfield doesn't see much action.
Point is....Nady and Swisher do not have to go anywhere. There would be plenty of playing time for both of them even if nobody gets hurt, and even more playing time if Damon, Matsui, Tex, and whoever is playing right field goes down with an injury.
Posted by: yanks09 | January 07, 2009 at 08:21 PM
Yankees are trying to dump salary, haha. And trading a guy making 5m does that? When you have Matsui (13m), Damon (13m), Nady (5m) free agents after this year???
Posted by: Zack | January 07, 2009 at 08:22 PM
"Nady and Swisher do not have to go anywhere"
exactly. Matsui is only going to DH 130 games, Damon will only play 130 games, Nady will take days off. Swisher rotates at LF/RF/1B/DH and he'll get his ABs, he does well we can swing him for a deadline trade or keep him and let him be in LF or RF next year
Posted by: Zack | January 07, 2009 at 08:23 PM
Zack....no a career does not consist of a players 2 best years. Nady was a part time player before 2007. I would wager that he is more the player he showed when he played on a DAILY basis (2007 and 2008) than when he was searching for his name in the lineup card/coming in to bat for the pitcher in the 8th inning.
Posted by: yanks09 | January 07, 2009 at 08:24 PM
Swisher is a bum.. he sucks so bad the sox played dewayne wise over him in the playoffs. seems like good clubhouse person but he can't hit s#it
Posted by: B-Rye | January 07, 2009 at 08:28 PM
whats your definition of "full seasons"?
'05: played for SDP
'06: starter for NYM, had appendectomy, traded to PITT
'07: starter for Pit, missed 16 games due to injury
'08: starter for Pit, missed 9 games due to shoulder, starter forNYY
He was never a bench player, he was a starter for the past 4 years who just saw DL time.
Posted by: Zack | January 07, 2009 at 08:32 PM
"Yankees absolutely stole him."
Makes me wanna be sick. Very few times have I ever seen a GM move a player in such an awful deal, at a totally unnecessary time.
Honestly, why the hell did KW trade Swish in early November? For that package of nothingness??
I get that the White Sox had simply decided that Swisher didn't fit on their team.
That doesn't mean that you just trade him to the first team that offers you some warm bodies. You just traded the base of your farm system for the guy, and then you deal him a year later for a tiny fraction of what you dealt for him.
"Matt Maloney and Chris Valaika should get it done for Nady"
No it wont"
Uhh. It might.
You do realize that Xavier Nady will be a free agent after the season, and was essentially a league average (maybe a little beter) player before 2008. He's only broke a .340 OBP once, and that was thanks to a .305 BA (that BA is partially thanks to a BABIP over 20 points higher than his career BABIP).
Nady is a fine player, but he's far from a great player.
Frazier is a very good hitting prospect whose value gets dragged down by his lack of a position, but he's still a pretty valuable guy. Throwing in another decent pitching prospect like Maloney should be close to enough.
I don't really see them going after guys like Mesoraco (already have Montero and Romine), Francisco (A-Rod) or Soto (A-Rod).
Posted by: scribbletone | January 07, 2009 at 08:33 PM
"like i said zack your a 14 yr old idiot
yankees payroll will be lower in 09."
payroll goes down because contracts expire and that means they're CUTTING payroll? cutting payroll means trading away guys, how many guys have they traded?
you're the idiot and everyone can see that. THEY JUST SPENT 400 MILLION and you say they're cutting payroll?
Posted by: Zack | January 07, 2009 at 08:34 PM
""Matt Maloney and Chris Valaika should get it done for Nady"
No it wont"
Uhh. It might.
You do realize that Xavier Nady will be a free agent after the season"
when was the last time the yankees traded a starter for prospects??
Posted by: Zack | January 07, 2009 at 08:35 PM
The bottom line is the Yanks do NOT have to move either of the 2. If they get a deal they like they will, if not they will go into the season with both. It really as simple as that.
Posted by: yankeegirl49 | January 07, 2009 at 08:37 PM
spend 400m this offseason so we can trade our RF for prospects? How does that make any sense???
The only way Nady is being traded is if its in a package with prospects for an MLB proven CF, other then that he's going nowhere
Posted by: Zack | January 07, 2009 at 08:37 PM
i think the yankees should trade nady for prospects from the reds and mix it with prospects they have already and take a shot at peavy.
Posted by: patrick | January 07, 2009 at 08:41 PM
Nady & veras to reds for phillips!
cano, Kennedy and/or melky to lad for kemp!
sign Manny 3yrs club opt for 4th 80% dh, 20% lf!
matsui(if waive no trade)to giants for sanchez or seatt for Bedard( %of money paid or prospect involved)!
hughes?aceves 5th starter!
joba back to setup mo!
cc,wang,burnett,(bedard or sanchez),hughes!
pen: Mo,joba,marte,brunney,coke, aceves,robertson!
:posada,tex,phillips,jeter, arod,damon, kemp, swish, manny!
bench molina,ransom,gardner, and 1 open slot to fill!
Posted by: Taylor89 | January 07, 2009 at 08:42 PM
if the yankees could pull off the trade for phillips i would turn around and trade cano for kemp
damon dh
jet ss
tex 1b
arod 3b
matsui lf
posada c
phillips 2b
kemp cf
Swisher rf
Posted by: patrick | January 07, 2009 at 08:51 PM
The reason I put that trade out there for Harang was because I wanted it to be obscene, the type that only a fool would turn down, and only a fool would offer.
Joba has done nothing really as a starter, other then prove that he can't stay healthy as one. He's got talent but he projects more as a reliever at this point. Which is fine and good, but a 200 inning ace caliber starter is more valueable.
I wouldn't give up anything of value for Nady. He's pretty average and I see no reason to over pay for such just to help out the Yankees.
I like Swisher consider him something of a Dunn lite, but the Yankees basically got him for free. A utility player they had no use for, and a couple of minor prospects that will be of little impact. The White Sox clearly wanted him gone and it looks like they took the first offer to get him out of there.
As for not trading for prospects what in the heck do you think your going to get for what is basically over paid bench help? Its not like the Yankees are particularly hurting in one area. Perhaps a proven bullpen arm.
Posted by: schellis | January 07, 2009 at 08:57 PM
"Age is insignificant for pitchers???
3.50 ERA in the NL becomes 4.50 ERA in the AL. He hasnt proven anything to me.
Wait hang on, I think Sandy Koufax is available."
Harang pitches in the most hitter friendly park in the major leagues and maintains that ERA.
Pitchers can pitch into their mid-40's. How many position players can do that? I can name one...Julio Franco...that's it. Harang is barely 30 years old, if that.
Joba pitched in a pitcher friendly Yankee stadium. Put him in Colorado or Cincy, and you'll see his numbers highly inflate at home.
Get with the program, please.
Posted by: Rob Dicken | January 07, 2009 at 08:58 PM
Phillips is worth far more then that pathetic package.
Posted by: schellis | January 07, 2009 at 08:58 PM
if u think phillips is worth more i'll throw in a jackson, as long as i'm dealin cano for kemp!
Posted by: Taylor89 | January 07, 2009 at 09:00 PM
1. It is very simple economics: If you paid your people $220 last year and this year you will pay $205, your payroll went down.
2. None of the Yankee OFs have to be traded and everyone will get 110+ starts (provided Melky rots in the minors)
3. Manny is not going to be a Yankee; get over it
4. Cashman wins most high profile trades. The Nady and Swisher deals are his m.o. Therefore: Cinci ... get ready to give up Harang and a prospect (would love Valaika / Bour) for not as much as you would have expected they'd be worth.
5. My only question is: Do MLB teams do sign-and-trade deals? If Nady can be signed for 3 - 4 years @ $8mil per, it might be more palatable for the Reds. I apologize for my ignorance if that kind of stuff is a non-starter.
Posted by: rossdfarian | January 07, 2009 at 09:02 PM
why is manny not going to be a Yankee???? cause u said so! if they can move 2 of nady, swish,matsui or damon theres a good shot manny could be brought in!
Posted by: Taylor89 | January 07, 2009 at 09:03 PM
Phillips is the face of the Reds, is a premier defensive player and has a solid bat for the position. With the recent trades of Dunn and Griffey the Reds need some veteran to build the fan base around. Unless they are getting something major I don't see them moving Phillips.
It would have to be for something closer to a one for one or something that Phillips was just a part of for it to make sense for the Reds.
Nady and a pair of prospects just isn't cutting it.
Posted by: schellis | January 07, 2009 at 09:07 PM
Why is Manny not going to be a Yankee:
1. Huge personalities already exist on the team ... no room for his ego
2. They want to get younger, not older and slower
3. Trading two of the Outfielders? It's a stretch that one gets traded!
4. Payroll might not be a problem but the Yankees can have the same record paying $13mil for LF/DH rather than $25mil and ownership knows the value of the difference.
5. Every player, coach, fan, concession salesperson, and reporter has witnessed his misbehavior first-hand. He has made a horrible impression.
6. The first time he gets booed and then makes a gesture toward the stands, he will be shot in the streets.
7. Because I said so.
Nice try, Taylor
Posted by: rossdfarian | January 07, 2009 at 09:09 PM
I wasn't aware that all of MLB had to do everything that Cashman said.
Harang is cheap relatively speaking, there will be far more teams bidding for him then just the Yankees because some owner stupidly gave the player some 20 million dollar deal.
Posted by: schellis | January 07, 2009 at 09:11 PM
the yankees should trade nady for a 5th starting in Arroyo then trade cano for kemp and sigh O-Hudson with the 10mil you were going to give Andy
damon dh
jet ss
tex 1b
arod 3b
matsui lf
posada c
kemp cf
swisher rf
hudson 2b
cc
aj
wang
joba
Arroyo
Posted by: patrick | January 07, 2009 at 09:15 PM
hahahahahaha, Manny is the best clutch hitter in the game by far, Hank and some of ownership want him! nady and swisher can be moved & alot of teams intrested in both, damon and matsui would come off the books next yr anyways so ur dumping age and 26 mill there! just the fact of him tearing up papelboner, beckett or dicek is pricless! a 3,4,5 of manny arod and tex would be deadliest in game! thats why he will be a yankee!!!!
Posted by: Taylor89 | January 07, 2009 at 09:16 PM
It wouldn't make sense for the Reds to trade Harang right now. He just had a down year, why would a team trade away prospects or a player who just had a career year for him? I'm not saying Harang isn't a good pitcher or that he won't bounce back but the Reds would be selling low, which doesn't make sense. He is more valuable in their rotation than as a trading chip.
Posted by: yanks09 | January 07, 2009 at 09:17 PM
cause i sadi so!!!! lol
Posted by: Taylor89 | January 07, 2009 at 09:19 PM
Taylor89....yes it is known that Hank wants Manny. But Hal doesn't want to go near Manny especially since the only teams bidding for his services are across the country and in the other league. And since Hal makes the decisions (thank god) Manny is not coming to NY.
Posted by: yanks09 | January 07, 2009 at 09:19 PM
Not the most compelling argument. But, you made a couple of points. I guess time will tell. I will praises you in posts for a week if you are correct, Taylor.
My prediction, Manny is a Dodger, Giant, Ranger, or Mariner before the end of next week.
Posted by: rossdfarian | January 07, 2009 at 09:20 PM
i was hearing somewhere that pirates would like to see nady come back how about nady-McLouth
Posted by: patrick | January 07, 2009 at 09:24 PM
"Harang pitches in the most hitter friendly park in the major leagues and maintains that ERA.
Pitchers can pitch into their mid-40's. How many position players can do that? I can name one...Julio Franco...that's it. Harang is barely 30 years old, if that.
Joba pitched in a pitcher friendly Yankee stadium. Put him in Colorado or Cincy, and you'll see his numbers highly inflate at home.
Get with the program, please."
What does a position players age have to do with anything???
Harang may be all that, but my point was the Yanks are NOT going to give up Joba, Swisher and Austin Jackson for him.
Sure, guys can pitch till they are 40..and Joba is 23 and will more likely than not put up at least numbers comparable to Harang. He is under the Yanks control for 4 more years.
I dont care what Joba's #s would be in Cincy, I know he did just fine in Yankee stadium and in the AL parks, thats all I need.
So YOU get with the program.
Posted by: yankeegirl49 | January 07, 2009 at 09:28 PM
trade for another rf, we are looking to get rid of corner of not add another one and LA would not trade either inless they were blown away kemp for cano is much more reasonable and takes care of cf.
Posted by: patrick | January 07, 2009 at 09:30 PM
Please let's not start this "Cano for Kemp" stuff again. Kemp is better, younger and cheaper than Cano. Not going to happen. And I'll emphasize CHEAPER because of the Dodgers owner.
Posted by: DodgersBruin | January 07, 2009 at 09:30 PM
cano had one bad season look at last seasons numbers .306 19 97 thats very good numbers for a second basemen
Posted by: patrick | January 07, 2009 at 09:33 PM
Patrick,
Cano isn't going to blow the Dodgers away.
First off, it is clear that with the Dodgers Logan White is very protective of his draft picks. He determines which ones will NOT be traded, and which ones will be allowed to be traded by Colletti.
Kemp, Martin, Loney, Bills, Kershaw, Broxton and Ethier are the main group.
You want to really blow the Dodgers away for Kemp? It'd take Joba, Hughes, Jackson and probably someone else.
Is that unreasonable? Yes. But that would blow the Dodgers away. Again, Logan White isn't letting his players go. So just drop it. I'm not going to debate the myth that Cano is a great player.
Posted by: DodgersBruin | January 07, 2009 at 09:35 PM
i agree cano for kemp straight up isn't fair but throw in kennedy and maybe melky and it is! and the fact that joe and bowa love cano would help in that deal!
Posted by: Taylor89 | January 07, 2009 at 09:39 PM
Cano makes a minimum of $29M over the next 3 years. That's a lot of cash to pay a player you HOPE isn't as bad as he was last year. That kind of cash better land you someone like Utley, not Cano's 86 OPS+.
Not just that, but the Dodgers also have Blake DeWitt at 2B. He's 22 and had a higher OPS+ than Cano last season. And he makes the league minimum for the next 2 seasons, and then he'll be arb. eligible for the following 3. He'll probably make 1/3 of Cano's salary for 2 extra years.
Posted by: DodgersBruin | January 07, 2009 at 09:40 PM
dogersbruin,
"myth" cano is a proven hitter life time 300+ his numbers aren't a myth.
Posted by: patrick | January 07, 2009 at 09:41 PM
dont wanna deal cano anyways unless we get a 2b say phillips (reds fans) back in some trade! and hudon for 5 for 50 isn't worth it!
Posted by: Taylor89 | January 07, 2009 at 09:41 PM
Really? You Yankee fans. Wow.
Cano = owed $29M. Had HORRIBLE season last year.
Kennedy = scouts project him as a AAAA pitcher. He was HORRIBLE in majors last year.
Melky = HORRENDOUSLY terrible. A 68 OPS+ last season was only dwarfed by Andruw Jones. And Melky isn't the defender Jones was last season.
for:
Kemp = 23 years old. 108 OPS+ last season. Being paid league minimum.
Dodgers don't need a 2B. They have Blake at third and DeWitt at second.
Dodgers don't need more unproven pitchers. They have McDonald, Elbert, Stults, and now Vargas.
Dodgers don't need a terrible OF. They have Jones and Pierre on the bench. Plus, Delwyn Young is 3-4 times the hitter Melky is. He just can't defend for crap.
You want to know what it would take to get Kemp? Well, he projects as a 30-30 hitter. Find someone in your organization that can replace that production THIS YEAR and for the next 10 years and the Dodgers might trade him. Because they aren't going to take prospects.
Posted by: DodgersBruin | January 07, 2009 at 09:47 PM
"LOL....kemp is a nice young player,buy you can keep kemp and his 153 k's"
You must think Adam Dunn was horrible last year since he had 164 K's, huh? Or Ryan Howard and his 199 K's?
Posted by: DodgersBruin | January 07, 2009 at 09:50 PM
i was hearing somewhere that pirates would like to see nady come back how about nady-McLouth
Posted by: patrick | January 07, 2009 at 09:24 PM
if yanks can get mclouth for nady which is highly unlikely i'd do it in a sec!
Posted by: Taylor89 | January 07, 2009 at 09:50 PM
"The only way Nady is being traded is if its in a package with prospects for an MLB proven CF, other then that ehe's going nowhere"
So the plan is to leave either Nady or Swisher on the bench, where their trade value will decline even further..?
"when was the last time the yankees traded a starter for prospects??"
Who cares. They have too many starting outfielders and it makes no sense to leave one on the bench where their trade value will decline. It would be a poor use of resources and money to allocate that much salary to a fourth outfielder, when you could easily shed the salary while also likely landing yourself a prospect or two.
Also, there have been ZERO indications that the Reds/Dodgers would even consider moving Brandon Phillips/Matt Kemp at this point, so why is it even worth bringing up? The Yankees aren't going to totally overwhelm the Reds/Dodgers, and that's what it would take for them to even consider a deal.
Take Cano, and run with it, the guy still has huge offensive potential.
Just because you want a player doesn't mean the other team has any interest at all whatsoever in moving him.
Posted by: scribbletone | January 07, 2009 at 09:52 PM
how many strikeouts did kemp have you fail to include that
Posted by: patrick | January 07, 2009 at 09:53 PM
"how many strikeouts did kemp have you fail to include that"
Ha.. ha.. uh..
Was this a serious comment?
Posted by: scribbletone | January 07, 2009 at 09:57 PM
The Reds are building for a long future, and Nady does not fit in those plans. He is a FA next year, is coming off a career year, will see a ton of pitches in that lineup resulting in big numbers again, and he is a Boras client. Result---He will be looking for a mega long term deal next year. This is not an option for the Reds
Posted by: carolina03 | January 07, 2009 at 09:57 PM