![]() |
|
|
| |
« Braves Interested In Nady, Swisher | Main | Heyman On Young, Pettitte, Dye, Cordero »
TUESDAY, 12:30pm: Dylan Hernandez says Saito's deal could be worth as much as $15MM over two years, although he is guaranteed just $1.5MM.
SATURDAY, 2:23pm: It appears the Dodgers weren't ready to offer the contract terms needed to bring Takashi Saito back. As Tony Jackson reports: "[the Dodgers] weren't about to give him anything close to this much money."
8:41am: Ken Rosenthal reports that the Red Sox have signed Takashi Saito to a one-year contract with a club option for 2010. The deal's worth between $1.5 and $2.5MM in 2009, but Saito could earn up to $7MM if he pitches well, according to Rosenthal's sources.
Saito passed his physical yesterday.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e2010536c3c9cd970c
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Red Sox Sign Takashi Saito:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
i hope they do ha, they probably will. but like the yankees, they received basically nothing out of the cathcer position last year and they still got real far.
Posted by: Zack | January 10, 2009 at 10:51 PM
tough to admit what? that signing 3 guys coming off major surgery put you guys over the top?
Posted by: Zack | January 10, 2009 at 10:53 PM
Tek couldn't hit for shi?,if it were up to me I'd let him get the stepping.
Posted by: casper80 | January 10, 2009 at 10:53 PM
if he was only else they would, but he is the captain and he gets the praise for handling the pitchers so well. its the same situation with pettite, swallow your pride and take a pay cut or retire. cause no team is signing varitek and giving up a 1st rounder
Posted by: Zack | January 10, 2009 at 10:55 PM
Those are your words not mine,are pitching staff was solid before we made those signings anyway,so only if 2 of those guys pan out we will still be contending for the Championship!
Posted by: casper80 | January 10, 2009 at 10:56 PM
ok i havent been posting on this site for "months" but okay. how about next time you have an actual example you point it out ok? then we can have a discussion, because saying "you're bias" "you give red sox no credit" without any examples, well sorry. every post here is time stamped, so any time you see me let me know which topic and which post and ill be happy to discuss it with you
Posted by: Zack | January 10, 2009 at 10:58 PM
I'm with u on that one ,u can never have enough pitching,and anybody will tell u that pitching wins championships.
Posted by: casper80 | January 10, 2009 at 11:03 PM
If I was Texas i wouldnt trade Salty/Teag straight up for just Buchholz, in that ballpark that teams needs groundball pitchers if they ever want to compete.
Kottaras did show power last year, 22hr in 400ab, hes not going to hit for avg but not catcher does. So why not hand it over to Kottaras and Bard/whoever. It's like the Yankees CF situation, if they arent getting the job done by July make a trade, same with Boston.
Posted by: Zack | January 10, 2009 at 11:09 PM
oh and Kottaras cant catch a knuckleball so they dont have to search for someone who does to platoon him with.
Posted by: Zack | January 10, 2009 at 11:10 PM
Except now that i see Kottaras was 15 for 90 in throwing out runnings last year, pretty bad when you team him up with mr. 23% bard
Posted by: Zack | January 10, 2009 at 11:12 PM
Your 100% wrong if Texas want to compete they need pitching, and a stud like Buchholz is exactly that. My educated guess is that if Boston would want to part ways with Clay ,Texas would be on board.
Posted by: casper80 | January 10, 2009 at 11:14 PM
The Rangers could very well be the Rays of this year if their pitching holds together. That offense is straight up scary.
Posted by: gnick55 | January 10, 2009 at 11:16 PM
Do you know about Texas stadium? Do you know how power pitchers= fly balls = home runs in that stadium?
They need guys who can keep the ball low and the ball inside the park.
Posted by: Zack | January 10, 2009 at 11:16 PM
Lets not over exaggerate saying that its like Coors field.
Posted by: casper80 | January 10, 2009 at 11:24 PM
Rob NY or NH dont say talk baseball or else buddy slow down and keep bird hunting up in NH and extended arb ready guys one/two years at a time isnt commitment and A nthony were u a sux fan in 2002 or as of late did you fall in love Boston fair weather all there moves Penny,Smoltz,Kotsay,Saito,and previous Lugo, Drew did Schilling pitch last year are viewed as WICKED good moves and you honestly believe that TEX,CC,AJ,NADY,MARTE are bad if the roles were reverse you would be laughing at me for trying to make sense of it all and Rob im not bashing thats what people do to people when they are homosexual and they hate them for it which thats wrong but im making a joke on a lame blog bro chill a little bit and look to change the world somewhere else
Posted by: yanksin4 | January 10, 2009 at 11:25 PM
http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/stats/parkfactor?sort=HRFactor&season=2008
its not exaggerating, look at the numbers
Posted by: Zack | January 10, 2009 at 11:28 PM
i guess it was kulaid my bad lol
Posted by: yanksin4 | January 10, 2009 at 11:28 PM
You said if you were Texas you'd jump over for Buchholz if it was offered. If the Yankees offered Hughes would you accept that? if not why
Posted by: Zack | January 10, 2009 at 11:29 PM
"The field is one of the notoriously hitter-friendly parks in baseball, due to the high temperatures and low humidity, relatively short fences, and the design of the stadium which has allowed the area's high winds to swirl and lift balls that wouldn't normally make it out."
im not making it up casper
Posted by: Zack | January 10, 2009 at 11:30 PM
U make a valid point,I still say Texas would pull the trigger on that deal with the quickness.
Posted by: casper80 | January 10, 2009 at 11:37 PM
"oh and Kottaras cant catch a knuckleball so they dont have to search for someone who does to platoon him with."
That is whay I have no wish for Boston to overpay and give up Buch or Bowden either for a catcher, it just is not worth it and let 'Tek either go elsewhere or retire even. Stick with Bard and Kottaras/Brown, whichever rookie has the best ST even though Kottaras is out of ML options.
The thought of going to texas and facing any of that staff this summer is enticing. They will be scoring 5-6 runs a game and lucky to hold decent teams to an average of less than 7+.. That staff hasn't got a chance and it will be even worse the their home field where the ball fly's out. I kind of hope they hold onto those 3 catcher's just to see Daniel's and Ryan shown up badly and the staff in a shambles.
Posted by: johns | January 10, 2009 at 11:40 PM
Knowing all the bad trades texas has made they probably would, and with nolan ryan there dont really know what hes up to. i just think it'd be a mistake.
1. their staff wasnt good anyways
2. but padilla was 47th in the al in groundout to flyout ratio (GO-AO), and milwood was 52nd
3. you cant have you're #1 & #2 be that bad when you're in the best hitting park in the league
should have signed lowe, trade millwood and padilla for whatever, feldman/harrison just walked too many guys this year, dont know their other prospects but should trade a strikeout guy( higher value) for a GB pitcher(lower value) and have the team throw in another 1 or 2 prospects
Posted by: Zack | January 10, 2009 at 11:46 PM
I know you would trade Teag/Salt in a second, but Texas has no need too, they have them under control for cheap. Those 2 guys have shown much more in the majors then Buchholz/Hughes have, if i was a fan i would go nuts if all we got back was Buchholz or Hughes.
Why not wait til the trade deadline?
1. you can see if hughes/buchholz have shown anything
2. nyy/bos could be desperate if catching is holding them back and you can get them into a bidding war (similiar to santana but obviously not the same price) and take the best deal on the table.
Posted by: Zack | January 10, 2009 at 11:49 PM
salt also showed last year what he could do, he has over 500ab. hughes/buchholz were both given the opportuniy and both failed. you're looking at it from bos/nyy view, you have to look at it from Texas' view. Teag isnt going to hit .300 but the kid has power, giving up him or salty for just hughes/buchh? not going to happen.
Posted by: Zack | January 11, 2009 at 12:20 AM
how is a no hitter, 2 CGs, and an K/9 of just under 9, a failure for Buchholz in the big leagues.
Posted by: glen_quagmire | January 11, 2009 at 12:26 AM
It cracks me up that the Texas Rangers, of all teams, don't want to trade a catcher for a starting pitcher. This team's Achilles heal has always been their starting pitching. In contrast, for nearly a decade they had arguably the greatest catcher to ever play the game. Exactly how many postseason games did the Rangers win in 12 years with Pudge Rodriguez behind the plate? Answer - exactly 1 game.
Posted by: midtown | January 11, 2009 at 12:52 AM
Yanksin4 is so predjustice!!! :) NOT all NH people hunt birds goddddddddd
________________________________________________________
/thread. Kulaid wins. We should all go home now.
Posted by: Rob NY | January 10, 2009 at 10:17 PM
______________________________________________________
From NY...most likely a New York Yankees Fan...yet somehow..i think your cool. This dude is the most knowledgable person on here. /thread is right..i do win.
______________________________
oh man i'm from MA and the last thing you want to do is pi$$ of a NH man in the middle of the woods... if they yell, does anyone really here them?
Posted by: AC24 | January 10, 2009 at 10:20 PM
___________________________________________________________
Are you implying something? Care to tell me?. Yeah thought so.
Baseball Forum = BASEBALL...not bashing on someomes place of living...their knowledge of the game bases on where they live, or anything. Its just plain stupid. As much as i hate the yankees as i team..i dont hate yankees fans. My dad is a yankees fan!!!! So why hate on me. I point out my opinions...state why i think so. you dont have to agree with me, but seriously...keep it civil
Posted by: Kulaid | January 11, 2009 at 01:23 AM
Yanksin4...i just re-read your post...did u call me homosexual? Are you kidding me? WOW dude. Just because i live in New Hampshire and like the red sox im homosexual?? Your logic is stupid man. Just Shut up and get off of this. because ever post you make, makes you even more and more of a disgrace for your fellow fans to call you a Yankees fan.
Posted by: Kulaid | January 11, 2009 at 01:36 AM
Snowing hard here in Ct. not many owls but those damn squirrels.
Read the posts earlier, and come on Sox fans, ( I am one too), Matsui is a very good ballplayer, he always impresses me.
All these signings are one thing a gamble, Penny we'll see, but from other teams posts Dodgers wanted Saito back, and the Braves fans were not too worried about Smoltz, so I am going to go by that for the time being.
Bucholz grew up in Texas, I lived there a while back, so many friends still there. They all said good things about him as younger player,, I have seen him myself in AA, 2007, never would want to get rid of him at this point. Sandy Koufax was 8-13 in 1960, already on Dodgers for 6 yrs. (Never went to minors), so leading to my next thought.
All good GM'S have patience, that is why Hughes is not gone or Bucholz or Bowden or Bard. Montero for Bard no good right, Theo didn't freakout and add another minor leaguer, he just moved on. Remember quick fix with Larry Anderson, for Jeff Bagwell.
Zach made a good comment, just wait this out at the moment. Texas GM is smart, they have some good young arms coming up, a good way to get better, trade for anothers team best pitching prospect, knowing that team has the need at that moment. Here is where the patience comes in, from now till July 31, you can do many things, maybe without giving up your best prospect. Show me teams with patient GM'S, who know how to deal. And the majority of times you will see a contender. Beane, Theo, Cashman, old Brave GM Schuerholz, Tampa GM now, Phillies old GM Gillick.
Time to shovel.
Posted by: Cyyoung | January 11, 2009 at 05:59 AM
midtown- how about you never mentio my name again since i never said i single word about new hampshire, get your facts straight
Posted by: Zack | January 11, 2009 at 08:16 AM
"how is a no hitter, 2 CGs, and an K/9 of just under 9, a failure for Buchholz in the big leagues.
Posted by: glen_quagmire"
how is 2-9, 6.75era, 11H/9, 4.9BB/9, 1.76 whip a success??
Posted by: Zack | January 11, 2009 at 08:17 AM
Reading these threads are hilarious. I do enjoy the myths that seem to continue to surround AJ Burnett. Or at least are perpetuated by Yankee fans to justify the contract he just signed. I believe the best one is that "he has proven he can pitch in the AL East". He pitched to the tune of just above league average last year, regardless of how many strikeouts he had. He also walked the 5th most batters in the AL too. Burnett is going to be 32 this season. While his "potential" is still being touted, without steroids, at what age does the end of a power pitcher's prime end? It's definitely not starting at 32. And Burnett hasn't had a dominant season yet in his career.
As for the "Burnett isn't like Penny" talk, that's true. At Burnett's best he's been 20% above league average. At Penny's best, he was 50% better than league average. And I know that the AL is better than the NL, but are you going to tell me that the AL is THAT much better than the NL? Or that the AL East is THAT much better than the NL West? If that's true, how does the NL West EVER win any interleague games?
As for Penny and Saito, I am sad to see either of them leave, especially for such reasonable salaries. But I don't think either would have signed for that amount with the Dodgers, as I don't think anyone would sign for relatively cheap with the team that just cut them loose.
I think the only way the Red Sox could have made these deals better is if they signed these players to minor league contracts with the same guarantee minimums and incentives while also including a release date if the players are healthy and left in minors so that they could have kept a few more 40 man roster spots open until the end of Spring Training.
Posted by: DodgersBruin | January 11, 2009 at 08:20 AM
"Or that the AL East is THAT much better than the NL West?"
are you kidding? the 3rd place al east team won 5 more games then your first place team, our 4th place team won 2 more games then your first place.
please dont even start that, put NY/BOS/TB in the nl west and they'd win 100+ games
Posted by: Zack | January 11, 2009 at 08:29 AM
"put NY/BOS/TB in the nl west and they'd win 100+ games"
put NY/BOS/TB in the NL West and they don't have a DH to use. Therefore, different team would be in the NL West. Again, I know the AL East has more talent than the NL West, but are you really going to tell me that the AL East is so superior to the NL West that someone who plays in the NL West can't be successful in the AL East? I don't think there is that big a disparity between major leaguers.
Posted by: DodgersBruin | January 11, 2009 at 08:33 AM
Take the DH away and either team would still be best the in NL West. Plus that only makes our pithing staff better.
"AL East is so superior to the NL West that someone who plays in the NL West can't be successful in the AL East?"
Yes that's what I'm saying.
Posted by: Zack | January 11, 2009 at 08:41 AM
Again, your first place team won 84 games. Our top 4 teams won 97, 95, 89, 86.
Posted by: Zack | January 11, 2009 at 08:42 AM
"Again, your first place team won 84 games. Our top 4 teams won 97, 95, 89, 86. "
And our first place team also swept the highest winning team in the NL in the playoffs. What's your point?
""AL East is so superior to the NL West that someone who plays in the NL West can't be successful in the AL East?"
Yes that's what I'm saying. "
You're an idiot.
Posted by: DodgersBruin | January 11, 2009 at 08:50 AM
"You're an idiot."
That's a good argument, have anything else? like facts about the discussion
?
Posted by: Zack | January 11, 2009 at 08:56 AM
""AL East is so superior to the NL West that someone who plays in the NL West can't be successful in the AL East?"
just for comparision: the Dbacks scored the same amount of runs as the Blue Jays, and had a worse ERA.
Posted by: Zack | January 11, 2009 at 08:58 AM
"That's a good argument, have anything else? like facts about the discussion"
What argument needs to be made? You just said that anyone who plays in the NL West couldn't be successful in the AL East. I guess Lincecum, Webb, Haren, Peavy and Billingsley should just quit. They'll never be able to play in the AL East.
Posted by: DodgersBruin | January 11, 2009 at 08:59 AM
"And our first place team also swept the highest winning team in the NL in the playoffs. What's your point?"
and our first place team won the series 3-1 against the highest winning team in the AL in the playoffs.
Posted by: Zack | January 11, 2009 at 09:00 AM
"What argument needs to be made? You just said that anyone who plays in the NL West couldn't be successful in the AL East. I guess Lincecum, Webb, Haren, Peavy and Billingsley should just quit. They'll never be able to play in the AL East."
sorry i thought we were talking about TEAMS, not individual players., so misread your statement.
Haren, Webb, Lincecum, Billingsly would succeed, Peavy with his 3.80era away from home would not
Posted by: Zack | January 11, 2009 at 09:02 AM
"just for comparision: the Dbacks scored the same amount of runs as the Blue Jays, and had a worse ERA."
Blue Jays had a DH. How many runs is a DH worth over a pitcher? Yes, the Blue Jays had the best ERA in baseball. And there's still a difference between playing an entire schedule against the AL vs. an entire schedule against the NL. The 4 AL East teams may have won more games than the Dodgers, but if you replace the Rockies with the Yankees, do the Yankees win 89 games when they have to face Lowe, Billingsley, Lincecum, Cain, Peavy, Young, Haren and Webb? I don't think so. Not with the injuries to the Yankees pitching staff and how horribly Hughes/ Kennedy pitched.
Posted by: DodgersBruin | January 11, 2009 at 09:05 AM
"Peavy with his 3.80era away from home would not"
Even if we completely discount his home stats and forget that his away stats are still a pretty small sample size, a 3.80 ERA would be the 37th best in baseball. Better than Carlos Zambrano, Josh Beckett and AJ Burnett among others. You can continue to think that a Cy Young winner won't succeed if he pitched in the AL all you want. But that's ridiculous to think that Andy Pettitte is a better pitcher than Jake Peavy.
Posted by: DodgersBruin | January 11, 2009 at 09:10 AM
"and our first place team won the series 3-1 against the highest winning team in the AL in the playoffs."
Actually, it was the 2nd place team that did that.
Posted by: DodgersBruin | January 11, 2009 at 09:13 AM
"Lowe, Billingsley, Lincecum, Cain, Peavy, Young, Haren and Webb?"
Yankees face Beckett, Dicek, Lester, Kazmir, Shields, Burnett, & Halladay. I think they're used to cy young caliber pitchers
"Blue Jays had a DH. How many runs is a DH worth over a pitcher?"
7 other NL teams scored more thens then the Dbacks
"Not with the injuries to the Yankees pitching staff and how horribly Hughes/ Kennedy pitched."
Starters era:
LA - 3.87, AR- 3.95, SF- 4.34, SD- 4.38, COl- 5.14
NYY- 4.58, then you adjust for the fact that they're no longer facing 9 of the best offenses. Um yeah 89games seem reasonable, definately 84
Posted by: Zack | January 11, 2009 at 09:16 AM
"Actually, it was the 2nd place team that did that."
well there you go, it was our 2nd best team who beat the highest winning team in the AL, just helped my point
Posted by: Zack | January 11, 2009 at 09:16 AM
facing 9 of top 15 offenses*
Posted by: Zack | January 11, 2009 at 09:17 AM
Did I say the Dodgers would have won the NL West if the Yankees were there? No. I said they'd be competitive. Oh, and you also said the Yankees would win 100+ games in the NL West. No team is going to win 100 games in the NL West when they have to face those 8 pitchers over the majority of 72 games.
Posted by: DodgersBruin | January 11, 2009 at 09:24 AM
"well there you go, it was our 2nd best team who beat the highest winning team in the AL, just helped my point"
No, it doesn't. Your two points were that the AL East top 3 teams would win 100+ against the NL West and that no NL West players could compete in the AL East. Outside of Mike Mussina, none of the Yankees pitchers last season could even compete with the top 8 pitchers in the NL West.
Posted by: DodgersBruin | January 11, 2009 at 09:28 AM
The Yankees didnt have a top 8 pitcher in the AL east either?
Beckett, Dicek, Lester, Kazmir, Shields, Burnett, & Halladay. We faced those guys all year.
And look at the rosters as they are right now, the only NL west team to improve are the Giants. Fine you argue about 100, you dont think NY/BOS/TB could walk in there and win 95 games easily?
"No, it doesn't. "
Yes it does, you made the point "And our first place team also swept the highest winning team in the NL in the playoffs," your first place team did that, and our 2nd place team beat the al's highest team 3-1.
Posted by: Zack | January 11, 2009 at 09:38 AM
"your first place team did that, and our 2nd place team beat the al's highest team 3-1."
But as you pointed out, my first place team only won 84 games. That's 13 wins less than the #1 team. The 2nd place team won 95 games. Only 5 games less.
"And look at the rosters as they are right now, the only NL west team to improve are the Giants. Fine you argue about 100, you dont think NY/BOS/TB could walk in there and win 95 games easily?"
We're not looking at the rosters right now. We're looking at last season's rosters. And are we talking about the Dodgers pre-Manny or post-Manny? Because post-Manny the Dodgers win more than 84 games. Hell, the Dodgers win more than 84 games if the starting OF included Kemp and Ethier all season instead of Pierre, Jones and a platoon of Kemp/Ethier.
So no, I don't think BOS/TB/NY walks in and wins "95 easily". The NL first off doesn't have a DH for production, nor does it allow for you to play your guys at the DH for a rest.
Posted by: DodgersBruin | January 11, 2009 at 09:59 AM
"does it allow for you to play your guys at the DH for a rest"
Boston never used teh DH for "Resting a player" and both teams have enough depth offensively to give guys complete days off when needed.
"Hell, the Dodgers win more than 84 games if the starting OF included Kemp and Ethier all season instead of Pierre, Jones and a platoon of Kemp/Ethier."
Yeah and if Yankees had Nady all year, and if Wang was healthy all year, and if we had 1st half pettite all year. Come on, you say i show bias and you think your 84 win team could compete with NY/BOS/TB over a 162 game season
Posted by: Zack | January 11, 2009 at 10:17 AM
"Boston never used teh DH for "Resting a player" and both teams have enough depth offensively to give guys complete days off when needed."
You just take David Ortiz off the team. No big loss there. And the Yankees make Giambi their full time 1B. A lot of AL production from Boston/NYY come from the DH spot. And allows sub-par defensive players to not play the field.
So yes, you put NY/BOS/TB in the NL West and LA/Ari competes with them. And SF/SD wins a few games against them because of their top end pitching. Am I saying that NY/BOS/TB doesn't win the division? No. But without that DH, and against the pitching, it's a discussion.
Posted by: DodgersBruin | January 11, 2009 at 10:26 AM
"But without that DH, and against the pitching, it's a discussion"
you dont think moving to the NL West would improve NY/BOS/TB's pitching numbers? yea they'd lose runs, but their pitching would also perform better without having to face a DH.
This discussion is stupid to have, everyone knows the NL West is the weakest division in baseball so lets avoid this dicussion that's going to go nowhere
Posted by: Zack | January 11, 2009 at 10:34 AM
"everyone knows the NL West is the weakest division in baseball so lets avoid this dicussion that's going to go nowhere"
Except that in 2007 the most wins in the NL came from the NL West. The Wild Card came from the NL West. And the top 4 teams in the NL West all had winning records.
Yeah, the NL West is the weakest division. Because the NL Central and AL West have LOADS of talent... Keep thinking the NL West sucks every year.
Posted by: DodgersBruin | January 11, 2009 at 10:52 AM
Key word 2007, its 2009
Posted by: BoSox5199 | January 11, 2009 at 11:51 AM
Yanksin4, Kulaid and Zack should all be banned. There is no need for their constant personal attacks of New Hampersherites, people who live in the woods and other homosexuals.
Posted by: midtown | January 11, 2009 at 01:51 AM
_____________________________________
Your so stupid dude... i am the one from new hampshire..and yanksin4 was making fun of people who live in the woods saying they were homosexual?...i just stood up for myself. and you think i should be banned? STFU dude.
Posted by: Kulaid | January 11, 2009 at 11:55 AM
"Key word 2007, its 2009"
Ummm, that's 1 season removed. '09 hasn't begun, let alone finished yet.
Posted by: DodgersBruin | January 11, 2009 at 12:02 PM
a lot of things can change over the course of a season
Posted by: BoSox5199 | January 11, 2009 at 12:18 PM
"How about this statistic - Zack has 82 posts on this thread alone - Half of them personal attacks on people.
Posted by: midtown"
why are you obsessed with me? name one personal attack ive done on someone
Posted by: Zack | January 11, 2009 at 12:27 PM
"the red sox are being racist. 4 jap pitchers. they are turning into team japan."
-- glen
very nicely put, very classy.
And no, you're being racist, you called them "japs",...... are you from the 1940s?
Are you saying that you could do better than the Japanese players? BTW team Japan won the WBC, and probably would have beaten the US if they didn't get robbed by an ump who probably thinks like you. Some of us are Japanese on this site.
Posted by: standtallyourgiants | January 11, 2009 at 12:42 PM
Wow, is this even about Saito anymore?
Might as well rename this "When Zack attacks, the sport knowledge of New Hampshire wildlife, the wars of Kulaid, Midtown and others, and oh, by the way, the Red Sox signed Takashi Saito!"
Sheesh, can't we be friends?
Posted by: DCSportsGuy | January 11, 2009 at 02:39 PM
Its a joke, man. You know, funny???
Ahhh, whatever.
The Red Sox are making some good signings.
Posted by: DCSportsGuy | January 11, 2009 at 05:02 PM
Next Sox signing has to be Pavano.
Posted by: JudgeNY | January 11, 2009 at 09:55 PM
Wowwwwwwww,
Saito + Okajima + Masterson + Ramirez + Delcarmen + Papelbon = LIGHTS OUT!
This bullpen is stacked.
Posted by: SoxFan2009 | January 12, 2009 at 02:33 AM
if you asked nl west teams to volunteer to move to the al east...who would volunteer...exactly my point..they would PAY to stay where they had a chance..
if you asked al east teams to volunteer to move to nl west, baltimore and toronto would put in sealed bids to go!!!
forget all the crap about dh this and pitchers that.. honestly, answer those two questions and you have an answer about the divisions...
it may change sometime but there is no question now
Posted by: UpstateNYSOXfan | January 12, 2009 at 08:24 PM
Dodgers would finsh dead last in the AL East. I rank both Orioles and Blue Jays higher than any tam from NL West, NL as a league is so much inferior and West is the worst of the NL leagues.
Posted by: slashieboy | January 13, 2009 at 12:50 PM
It's only because Baltimore and Toronto cant compete with the payroll, maybe mlb should just make the Yanks and Sox a division. I know espn would love it!
Posted by: standtallyourgiants | January 13, 2009 at 12:52 PM
"How about this statistic - Zack has 82 posts on this thread alone - Half of them personal attacks on people."
That's fuckin impressive. I'm just not sure if it reflects on him the way he'd like it to.
As for Saito, it's a great buy low. He could end up being an elite, dominant set up man for Papelbon, giving them an unreal bullpen:
Papelbon, Saito, Okajima, Masterson, Ramirez, Declarmen and Lopez.
I'm guessing most if not every team is envious.
Posted by: scribbletone | January 13, 2009 at 01:00 PM
the red sox have the best bullpen in the league
Posted by: glen_quagmire | January 13, 2009 at 01:05 PM
What the hell happened to this thread? I wouldn't think a Saito signing would cause so much fur to fly.
If enough arms stay healthy in Boston and Tampa, NY misses the playoffs...unless they sign the best rbi guy in mlb.
Posted by: paxterj | January 13, 2009 at 01:07 PM
"glen,
if the red sox have 23 current white guys on there current roster.
Posted by: marlinsman1120"
"Current white", they could change any second now.
Posted by: ArodSucksAtLife | January 13, 2009 at 01:10 PM
What on earth does race have to do with baseball? So stupid, Boston is a white city so what. The Celtics have only one white guy on the entire roster, that is hardly enough if you want to look at the etnicity of the city.
Posted by: slashieboy | January 13, 2009 at 01:14 PM
If he's healthy, the Sox just picked up a solid reliever. Saito's a warrior.
My only criticism of Saito is that he tends to throw a few too many pitches to get an out for my liking. I always felt comfortable when he would come in, but he gets into too many 3-2 counts before getting the K.
Posted by: DodgersLBC | January 13, 2009 at 01:21 PM
"It's only because Baltimore and Toronto cant compete with the payroll, maybe mlb should just make the Yanks and Sox a division. I know espn would love it!"
The Mets would have to be in that division, since they also outspend the Sox. Besides, somebody has to miss the playoffs each year.
Posted by: Little Bear | January 13, 2009 at 02:20 PM
Kenan after our spat this subject you are right about, saito has nasty stuff my only concern is if at 39 is he slowing down some and if he is 100 % healthy. I think the benefits outway the risks and if he is back to being the normal saito he could be a terrific guy out of the bullpen. I want to see if the yankees are going to try and counter by signing one more starter I think sheets or Perez would be nice or hell give me garland he can eat innings. Also kenan what would you think of the yanks maybe giving a chance to kris benson I think he could be a pennyish type risk benefits outweighing the risks, and he would be cost effective too. Thoughts anyone anyone..
Posted by: yankeefan4life79 | January 13, 2009 at 02:26 PM
Why is Zack gone?? Did he do something wrong in here did he do a chat booboo??
Posted by: yankeefan4life79 | January 13, 2009 at 02:27 PM
The Yankees bullpen is very good too let's not sleep on the fact that the kids who were growing up last year have had almost a full year under there belts now I think the yankees will be just fine as long as they can ink one more starter an innings eater type, and they will be just fine a 3 team race for sure next year barring any unforseen issues I'm pumped..
Posted by: yankeefan4life79 | January 13, 2009 at 02:37 PM
How am I harassing posters ?? I said the saito signing was a wise one and that it could have nice benefits where in that post did I harass anyone get a grip will ya jeez it's friggin baseball.
Posted by: yankeefan4life79 | January 13, 2009 at 02:39 PM
The sox have made some wise cheap signings and could really be poised to make more, the only signing they have made that is sketchy is the baldelli signing but for chump change it's worth it I guess, so do not couple me with zack please I'm far to intelligent and open minded for that , and did he really call japanese people japs??? WOW...
Posted by: yankeefan4life79 | January 13, 2009 at 02:41 PM
Glavine seemed all upset his buddy left for greener pastures in boston mybe he should follow the braves are going nowhere soon...
Posted by: yankeefan4life79 | January 13, 2009 at 02:43 PM
What would Tom Glavines ERA be in the AL East? over/under 10 probably over.
Posted by: slashieboy | January 13, 2009 at 02:59 PM
"What would Tom Glavines ERA be in the AL East? over/under 10 probably over."
Doubt that... but his control noticeable slipped last year, enough so that his past successes of turning himself into a finesse pitcher will be forgotten. He really should retire or start a job as a pitching coach.
Posted by: start_wearing_purple | January 13, 2009 at 03:04 PM
If enough arms stay healthy in Boston and Tampa, NY misses the playoffs...unless they sign the best rbi guy in mlb.
If enough arms in NY stay healthy, they have 4 aces. How does Tampa and Boston compete with that? Boston especially with 5 of 6 starters spending significant time on the DL last season.
Posted by: Tex's New Best Friend | January 13, 2009 at 03:04 PM
I'd have to argue that Zack is among the worst human beings of this or any other generation.
Posted by: scribbletone | January 13, 2009 at 03:18 PM
"If enough arms in NY stay healthy, they have 4 aces. How does Tampa and Boston compete with that? Boston especially with 5 of 6 starters spending significant time on the DL last season."
Yeah and we missed the playoffs too... oh wait.
See your argument is fundamentally flawed. You argue if ny stays healthy but imply that an injured team still can compete. Besides ny has just as many question marks as any other team. While Sabathia will still be reliable consider this: How long before Burnett goes on the DL? Will Hughes ever be effective? What will Joba's first full starter season look like in the MLB? Are you really that comfortable handing Wang the ball in a big game, only his W/L record says "ace." And the biggest one of all... with Jeter/Posada/Damon etc getting older and already on one of the worst defensive teams, can Tex really single handedly mask that?
Posted by: start_wearing_purple | January 13, 2009 at 03:36 PM
"If enough arms in NY stay healthy, they have 4 aces. How does Tampa and Boston compete with that? Boston especially with 5 of 6 starters spending significant time on the DL last season."
Welcome back, Zack. That didn't take long.
Posted by: Little Bear | January 13, 2009 at 04:21 PM
"Welcome back, Zack. That didn't take long."
Was he banned or something?
Posted by: start_wearing_purple | January 13, 2009 at 04:25 PM
Sadly, I dont think Zack was banned. His lack of reason may be unparalleled on this website.
Posted by: themfightnwords | January 13, 2009 at 04:56 PM
Sadly, I dont think Zack was banned. His lack of reason may be unparalleled on this website.
Posted by: themfightnwords | January 13, 2009 at 04:57 PM
The Evil Empire has 4 aces! LOL! The only ace you have is CC as D.L. Burnett and Wang are 2's while Joba could be as big a flop as Buchholz and certainly won't pitch over 150 innings so right now he's a 4 on any respectable team. IMO Tampa's rotation is as good while far more sturdier than the one in the bronx which is one injury away from 4th place still as they have ZERO DEPTH and a failure of a rookie in the 5 hole. The Red Sox rotation is more talented and much deeper than any in baseball as Beckett, Lester, and Dice-K are the best 1,2,3 in baseball and Smoltz, Penny, Wakefield, Buchholz, and Masterson would be almost as good as the current MFY starting 5 if penny and smoltz are healthy especially when you consider the sox may have the best defense in baseball and the Evil Empire has one of the worst. Better manager, better starters, better bullpen, better defense, better bench and slightly better offense means that yankee posters on sox sites are wasting their time. In other words,if a yankee troll falls in the woods does anyone care?
Posted by: RED SOX DYNASTY! | January 13, 2009 at 04:06 PM
Wow a more cocky and stupid remark I have never heard in my life, dice k is a very good pitcher who has infantile control issues, and beckett while dominant when healthy has been a question mark over the years, then you have lester who I believe is the best pitcher of the 3 and he is going into uncharted territory he pitched alot of innings last year his 1st full big league year we'll see how he rebounds, as far as joba he has already shwon to be a better pitcher than buchholz he has shown power and excitement now if he can keep his pitch count down he is a legitimate 2 right now, CC is CC dominant and a workhorse, and Burnett well he can be nasty but see beckett he has the potential let's see if he lives up to it, Wang is in my mind either a 2 or a high 3 he has good command but needs that ground ball to stay on the mound . It will be a very interesting year to see who can stay healthy and happy and pitch the way they are capable of this year, the bosox and yanks both have great pitching great hitting and great bullpens , and tampa is still there too it will truly be a fun year so let's get it on..
Posted by: yankeefan4life79 | January 13, 2009 at 05:30 PM
But Bostons 1,2,3 is not the best in baseball that honor is up in the air, and as far as yankees posting on sox posts, what about the sox fans who bombard yankee posts grow up it's baseball and it's the greatest rivalry in sports and it's gotten alot better this year the teams are so damn close to being even it's not even funny and in my mind things will be heated and fun as always, espcially considering the whole teixeira thing .. Wow is he gonna get booed in Bean town man that boy better has ear plugs..lol..
Posted by: yankeefan4life79 | January 13, 2009 at 05:35 PM
"as far as joba he has already shwon to be a better pitcher than buchholz he has shown power and excitement now if he can keep his pitch count down he is a legitimate 2 right now"
A legitimate 2 can get out of the 6th inning on a consistent basis. Wang is a legitimate 2. Joba is not. Come back when he pitches a complete game, even once.
Posted by: Little Bear | January 13, 2009 at 08:07 PM
"I remember when the Braves had Maddux, Glavine, Smoltz and Avery in their primes. That group was referred to as The Four Aces. It was true too, since three of them will be enshrined in Cooperstown. I wouldn't compare what the Yankees have to that group."
Exactly Midtown, those 4 as a group were consistenand a definate corp group that excelled, same with 71 Orioles group that consisted each of 20 game winners:
Dave McNally
Jim Palmer
Mike Cuellar
Pat Dobson
Calling/having a team as definate as that Barves and Orioles team easily the best staff in BB is one thing when facts/stats can back it up, but not this upcoming Yankee team that has DL guys, a 5 inning pitcher and 2 of them never even starting a game for is absolutely no chance a top 5 in BB staff and cannot even be called that within the league until these guys pitch a few games together, it's just ludicrous to project that staff as best in BB like that.
Posted by: johns | January 14, 2009 at 01:04 AM
Let me get this straight...Saito is not worth 1.5 guaranteed on a make-good contract but Mota is worth signing? Another example of McCourt and Colletti cutting corners and running a big market baseball team like a candy store. Even if they sign Manny for 20M per they have cut about 25M OFF the payroll and have not replaced Lowe and Penny. Pitching wins which is why the Braves overpaid for Lowe. As it stands the Giants, with no hitting, have a better team.
Posted by: Sdecee | January 14, 2009 at 09:22 AM