![]() |
|
|
| |
« Cruz, Diamondbacks Continue Talking | Main | Red Sox Rumors: Lugo, Bay, Varitek, Beckett »
SUNDAY: Mike DiGiovanna of the L.A. Times has details on Santana's new deal: $3.8MM in '09, $6MM in '10, $8MM in '11, and $11.2MM in '12. The 2013 option for $13MM carries a $1MM buyout.
The Angels will pay Santana $17.8MM for his three arb years, up from the typical $14MM paid for that period in these types of deals. The Angels and Santana's agent may have been looking at Scott Kazmir's deal as the model, the main difference being that Kazmir's first arb year salary had already been determined before he signed long-term in May of '08.
SATURDAY: According to Jon Heyman of SI.com, the Angels have agreed to a $30MM, four-year extension with Ervin Santana. There is a club option for a fifth year. The contract will prevent the two sides from going to arbitration. Heyman heard from WFAN's Sweeny Murti that the option year is worth $12MM, if exercised. In that case, the deal would cover two of Santana's free agent years.
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
that's a good move by the Halos Santana was pretty good last year!! i could only see him getting better.
Posted by: Danorage | February 14, 2009 at 12:01 PM
Great Signing a good young starter under team control I agree he can only go up from here.
Posted by: Jon | February 14, 2009 at 12:07 PM
Jon and Danorage- I do too see him getting better, but don't forget he is still young and inexperienced. He could still lose control or something like rich hill did. Hill was pretty good in 06-07 for the Cubs, then suddenly lost his command. I know santana is better, but it could happen
Posted by: bobby p | February 14, 2009 at 12:19 PM
Why doesn't anyone give Mark Mulder a minor league deal?
Posted by: bravoboy10 | February 14, 2009 at 12:27 PM
Only go up? You guys must not have watched much Angel baseball in 2007. He was awful. While I remain optimistic that the real Santana is the 2008 version that is far from certain.
Also, how can anyone call this a good deal without knowing the specifics? Let's see where the dollars fall before we praise the contract.
Posted by: bjsguess | February 14, 2009 at 12:43 PM
"Only go up? You guys must not have watched much Angel baseball in 2007. He was awful. While I remain optimistic that the real Santana is the 2008 version that is far from certain."
Honestly I don't think we'll see the 2007 Ervin Santana again.
This guy was simply dominant last year.
He managed to up his K rate to 8.79 per 9, and he lowered his walk rate from 3.48 to 1.93 per 9.
In 2007, hitters had a .333 BABIP against him, but in his other three years in the majors it's been around .300 or lower (it was .302 last season).
His average fastball velocity went from 92.2 MPH in 2007 all the way up to 94.4 MPH in 2008, and he added 3 MPH to his slider as well, with an average velo of 83.9 in 2008.
The guy simply added a ton of confidence, began to throw the way he's capable of, and started commanding his fastball better.
I like this guy a lot and think it's a very good signing. The core of Lackey (if they resign him, I'm guessing they will), Santana, Saunders and Weaver is very good, especially if Walden or Adenhart breaks out within a year or two as well.
Posted by: scribbletone | February 14, 2009 at 01:06 PM
Well - I hope you are right scribbletone. He was outstanding in 2008. I just remember all to well 2007. Even in 2006 he posted top level stats in Anaheim and was utterly awful on the road. Santana has always been somewhat of a wildcard.
We've known the guy as ace stuff since he entered the system. His problem has always been mental. That's what scares me.
Personally, the contract (now that it is posted) seems a little steep. It's not a terrible signing by any means but I don't see the bargain here.
Posted by: bjsguess | February 14, 2009 at 01:29 PM
bjsguess -
i dont think we have to worry about the home/road splits anymore. Santana was actually insanely good on the road last year, going 11-2 with a 3.02 ERA in 116 innings.
scribbletone -
i think you're right on. a core of Lackey (hopefully), Santana, Saunders and Weaver is HIGHLY impressive, and will only get better if Adenhart can figure it out.
and didn't Santana hit 100 MPH a couple of times this past year?
Posted by: bseballcrzy17 | February 14, 2009 at 01:37 PM
"We've known the guy as ace stuff since he entered the system. His problem has always been mental. That's what scares me."
I think that's what scares me the most about him as well. Clearly, his stuff is ace quality, and when his head is on straight, he's an ace.
But he's also shown those tendencies to break down, especially on the road, and there's always the risk that he'll lose it again, kind of the way Rich Hill did.
I still think it's a good signing, because his stuff is so good that he even if he crumbles a bit he should still be a solid BOR starter, which would make him a little overpaid but not that much.
Posted by: scribbletone | February 14, 2009 at 01:40 PM
Great signing for the Angels.
Posted by: melonis rex | February 14, 2009 at 02:33 PM
Good deal. Nice to see him locked up for certain!
Posted by: johns | February 14, 2009 at 03:14 PM
Clearly an ace in the making. Good control and great velocity, good job by the Angels to lock him up. Hope he covers Saunders in '09, he is in for a rude awakening.
Posted by: Tomahawk368 | February 16, 2009 at 01:49 AM
I think Santana is more likely to totally fall apart, as his issues were mental and completely dragged him down.
Saunders was great last year and seems in line to be a good mid-rotation starter for a while.
Posted by: scribbletone | February 16, 2009 at 09:32 AM
Great signing for The Angels.
Thank God he got over whatever was spooking him on the road in 07.
Now let's get Lackey signed to an exstension.
Posted by: AngelDude | February 17, 2009 at 09:29 PM
"I think Santana is more likely to totally fall apart, as his issues were mental and
completely dragged him down."
I disagree. Santana's issues were both mental and mechanical. He changed his approach and was excellent this year. I don't see that changing.
"Saunders was great last year and seems in line to be a good mid-rotation starter for a while."
I'm a big Saunders fan, as anyone should be with a lefty who can throw 95, but I worry about how few bats he missed last year. He needs to up his K rate or do what he did last year for a few more years to show he is legit.
Posted by: AA | February 18, 2009 at 07:08 PM