![]() |
|
|
| |
« White Sox, Astros Not Discussing Oswalt Trade | Main | News From Twitter: Red Sox, Corey Hart, Victor Martinez, Cardinals »
Mark Bowman of MLB.com talked to Braves GM Frank Wren about the possibility of trading for outfield help, and Wren's comments paint a picture of a tough market:
Bowman writes that "there would likely be some power bats that come into the picture" if the Braves were willing to offer top pitching prospect Tommy Hanson, but notes the they have "absolutely no desire" to trade the righthander.
Wren went hard after pitching last offseason, picking up Derek Lowe, Kenshin Kawakami, and Javier Vazquez, but their offense has let them down so far.
Which hitters might be a good fit for the Braves? If Wren is unwilling to part with Hanson, how much should he give up for offensive help?
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
PLEASE get brad hawpe. he's the best we can get right now. before i thought it was a good decision to keep up schafer when he was struggling, but its getting a little ridiculous now.
Posted by: beastuh26 | June 01, 2009 at 07:11 PM
First thing I read was: "Braves were willing to offer top pitching prospect Tommy Hanson" and thought Wren lost his mind.
Posted by: venn177 | June 01, 2009 at 07:12 PM
Didn't mean to scare you, venn177! That would be a bold move, indeed.
Posted by: Brian Shephard | June 01, 2009 at 07:18 PM
The Braves are lucky to be just 4 games out with the lack of offense they have in the outfield. I saw Bobby was trying Diaz in center and right field the last few games. I think the Braves front office knows they made a mistake in not getting a big outfield bat this off season, but getting starting pitching was the main concern and its that starting pitching that has the Braves still in this NL east race.
Posted by: brent | June 01, 2009 at 07:24 PM
I hope nobody says Luuuuuuuuuke Scott
Posted by: colaz | June 01, 2009 at 07:25 PM
I think we should send down Schafer for a month or two and bring up Blanc for CF. Blanco has been getting better after a really bad start in AAA posting a .355 OBP in May and hitting .350 over the last ten games. Blanco would give us a solid OBP leadoff guy and let Kelly take his May .828 OPS down the order where he can knock in some guys.
Anyone we could trade for or even Diaz/B.Jones would be an upgrade over Failcoeur.
Posted by: bbxxj | June 01, 2009 at 07:27 PM
I just think they still need to wait a little longer. Nobody is running away with the east especially now that phillies are looking for another starter. Once the races clear up there will be more options. Also when teams get healthy. Holliday keeps putting up decent numbers(i think i read somewhere he was on pace for 21 and 96 rbis...might be wrong but if so thats gonna be more than the ATL outfield put together)but people are considering him disapointing so maybe we dont have to give up as much to get him. I really am in favor of hawpe but i also would like a righty in between chip and b mac. I think itll end up being somebody not even on the radar. Vazquez might be on his way out for that big bat and that could open up more options. I love Javy and dont want to give him up but its either give him up or go with prospects and we arent trying to do that so i think that is what might ending up happening if we want to get that bat and have it not be a rental
Posted by: asajr | June 01, 2009 at 07:28 PM
Brad Hawpe for Charlie Morton/Francouer/and a low level prospect
Posted by: Bravesfan21 | June 01, 2009 at 07:28 PM
Bowman notes that the Braves have a team slugging percentage of .394, 14th in NL.
Posted by: Brian Shephard | June 01, 2009 at 07:28 PM
* i didnt mean play the prospects i meant we didnt want to trade the top prospects
Posted by: asajr | June 01, 2009 at 07:29 PM
Aaron Rowand? Would the Brave take him?
Posted by: BLB | June 01, 2009 at 07:29 PM
"Holliday keeps putting up decent numbers(i think i read somewhere he was on pace for 21 and 96 rbis...might be wrong but if so thats gonna be more than the ATL outfield put together)but people are considering him disapointing so maybe we dont have to give up as much to get him."
Beane values draft picks more than most GM's...Holliday will still cost alot.
Posted by: 86 Mets | June 01, 2009 at 07:31 PM
Vazquez is going nowhere. There is no way we give up our three headed monster that is keeping us in contention. When you have your top three throwing 200 inning pace well under a 4.00ERA you need to keep that together.
We have enough expendable pitching at every level to put a trade together.
Posted by: bbxxj | June 01, 2009 at 07:31 PM
You know who the Braves could use now? Andruw Jones.
Posted by: venn177 | June 01, 2009 at 07:32 PM
The Braves are kind of within striking distance, and shouldn't give up on the season, but this was sort of a transition year from them from the beginning, that was the plan, and they really are set to compete next year. So, imo, they shouldn't trade any part of the future for a quick fix to try to win this year, because it is unlikely. Next year, the Braves are slated to have a rotation of Hudson, Jurrjens, Lowe, Vazquez and Hanson. So wait until the winter, and go get a bat. They can be active in the trade market and the free agent market, because they will have some serious rotation depth. I'm not quite sure about how much money they will have to spend, but I wonder if they could make a run at Holliday or Bay. Hopefully they can have Heyward break into the team next year also. The good times for Atlanta are coming, I hope they don't get caught up in trying for a quick fix this year that hurts them in the long term, but with Wren, J.S. and Cox they are in good hands.
Posted by: nrmax88 | June 01, 2009 at 07:33 PM
The only deal Hanson would be involved in is in a deal for Adrian Gonzalez...
Posted by: nymforlife | June 01, 2009 at 07:35 PM
The braves should trade for Pujols. The cards may trade him since he's getting closer to free agency. He used to play outfield.
Posted by: uwalfos | June 01, 2009 at 07:37 PM
The braves should trade for Pujols. The cards may trade him since he's getting closer to free agency. He used to play outfield.
Posted by: uwalfos | June 01, 2009 at 07:37 PM
Venn177...
I said this would happen. If we let Andruw get away, he'd be above average again. Wouldn't it be nice to have him in centerfield or rightfield now? I'd be ok with Diaz everyday if we could hae just avoided Anderson and had Andruw's bat again.
Posted by: kdmarkum | June 01, 2009 at 07:38 PM
Holliday hasn't been that much worse than Bay this year. There's only a 0.2 WAR difference separating the two. And he's doing this in the biggest pitcher's park in MLB not named Petco.
Has Wren called Freeman off limits yet? I could see Freeman being westward bound.
Posted by: melonis rex | June 01, 2009 at 07:43 PM
uwalfos: Your joking right? First off Pujols would play 1st over anyone the Braves have. Period. Secondly, the Cards are not looking to trade him. They are already talking about a contract extension. Not to mention they are 1 game out of the NL Central.
How about the Braves think about trading Chipper? Makes more sense than the Cards thinking about trading Pujols.
Posted by: Billiken | June 01, 2009 at 07:45 PM
Has anyone thought about Josh Willingham from Florida or Matt Murton from Colorado? Neither are an "impact" player, but Willingham has 9 HR on the season and is from Alabama. Murton has only 1 HR but I think has a .474 SLG to Jeff F's .344. Murton is a Ga Tech grad...
Posted by: matthewyoung | June 01, 2009 at 07:46 PM
Heh. I was screaming all off-season that every team in need of a CF should sign Andruw, and I'm sure if you look around the comments enough you'll see it.
I love being right. The Rangers got a steal, as his power is starting to come back, and just you watch, next year: Gold glove, 30+ HR, .280 avg.
I'm kind of surprised the Yankees didn't take a card out on him for CF, but they seem to have it down with Melky hitting like .319. I could talk about Andruw Jones all day and how many teams would like to have him.
:)
Posted by: venn177 | June 01, 2009 at 07:46 PM
"Holliday hasn't been that much worse than Bay this year. There's only a 0.2 WAR difference separating the two. And he's doing this in the biggest pitcher's park in MLB not named Petco."
Posted by: melonis rex | June 01, 2009 at 07:43 PM
For right handed batters, Fenway has also had the largest home/road differential in baseball over the last 8 seasons. The monster turns easy flyballs into XBH's on a regular basis.
Posted by: 86 Mets | June 01, 2009 at 07:46 PM
Willingham plays for Washington...he came up with Florida. My bad...
Posted by: matthewyoung | June 01, 2009 at 07:46 PM
Gabe Gross from the Rays wouldn't cost too much and could platoon with Francouer (Even this year Jeff has managed a respectable OPS vs. LHP). Gross can provide top tier defense and a be an above avg bat vs RHP, also he can be expendable to Tampa if Matt Joyce stays in the majors.
Posted by: CubFanRaysaddict | June 01, 2009 at 07:47 PM
"I said this would happen. If we let Andruw get away, he'd be above average again. Wouldn't it be nice to have him in centerfield or rightfield now?"
Andruw has massive Arlington splits.
He'd still represent a major improvement in the Braves' OF, but Texas will overprice him.
Posted by: melonis rex | June 01, 2009 at 07:48 PM
I doubt Texas will be seller's...they have the best record in the AL, and that division isn't looking as goo as people thought before the season.
Posted by: 86 Mets | June 01, 2009 at 07:52 PM
I was just thinking: Imagine how well Andruw would be doing in New Yankee Stadium (herein referred to as Coors East). Texas has been a launching pad for him, but Coors East has given even crazier offensive numbers.
Posted by: venn177 | June 01, 2009 at 07:53 PM
Rick Ankiel would be a perfect fit. A MI or SP prospect would definitely work for the Cards...
Posted by: Billiken | June 01, 2009 at 07:54 PM
Rick Ankiel couldn't be a worse fit. The Braves aren't going to win because of Rick Ankiel this year, so you are giving up prospects for him, and there is almost zero chance the Braves resign him.
Posted by: nrmax88 | June 01, 2009 at 07:57 PM
I was just thinking: Imagine how well Andruw would be doing in New Yankee Stadium (herein referred to as Coors East). Texas has been a launching pad for him, but Coors East has given even crazier offensive numbers.
Posted by: venn177 | June 01, 2009 at
True, but keep in mind the offenses that have been playing the majority of the games at yankee stadium are MUCH better than the AL west opponents playing in Arlington.
Posted by: 86 Mets | June 01, 2009 at 07:59 PM
Brad Hawpe for Charlie Morton/Francouer/and a low level prospect
Posted by: Bravesfan21 | June 01, 2009 at 07:28 PM
Hawpe would cost MUCH more than that. He would cost something like Medlen,Morton, Gorkys plus another prospect or two. And Colorado would not want Francoeur.
Posted by: BravesAllTheWay | June 01, 2009 at 08:01 PM
Brad Hawpe for Charlie Morton/Francouer/and a low level prospect
Posted by: Bravesfan21 | June 01, 2009 at 07:28 PM
Charlie Morton and a low level prospect have no more value with francouer than they do without him. He has zero value.
Posted by: 86 Mets | June 01, 2009 at 08:03 PM
You can have Eric Byrnes on the condition that you pay his contract or a large portion of it. No players needed in return.
Posted by: firmturf | June 01, 2009 at 08:04 PM
No way. If I am Frank Wren, I am not giving you Medlen or Gorkys Hernandez for Brad Hawpe, a good hitter (better at Coors, but still a good hitter on the road), but he gives a lot of his offense back because he is probably the worst fielder at any position on any team in baseball. He is a completely appalling outfielder, plus even while I said his H/R splits aren't anything extreme, you are always taking a chance with a coors hitter. I think the Rockies would be wise to move Hawpe before teams realize what a truly horrific outfielder he is, if they haven't already.
Posted by: nrmax88 | June 01, 2009 at 08:06 PM
on july 3rd, if the braves dont need power, there will be an OF hitting about 400 on the dodgers who will be available. just so you know...
Posted by: lakersdodgersyankees4life | June 01, 2009 at 08:07 PM
Andruw Jones? Sure, .280-30 because he's not totally embarrassing himself in Texas?
Guess that .233 road average isn't a concern?
Posted by: vtadave | June 01, 2009 at 08:08 PM
on july 3rd, if the braves dont need power, there will be an OF hitting about 400 on the dodgers who will be available. just so you know...
Posted by: lakersdodgersyankees4life | June 01, 2009 at 08:07 PM
The braves are reportedly looking for a power hitter, juan pierre is a terrible fit.
Posted by: 86 Mets | June 01, 2009 at 08:10 PM
I wasnt sure if they just wanted an OF. remember, the have Chipper and Mccann in the middle.
''No way. If I am Frank Wren, I am not giving you Medlen or Gorkys Hernandez for Brad Hawpe, a good hitter (better at Coors, but still a good hitter on the road), but he gives a lot of his offense back because he is probably the worst fielder at any position on any team in baseball. He is a completely appalling outfielder, plus even while I said his H/R splits aren't anything extreme, you are always taking a chance with a coors hitter. I think the Rockies would be wise to move Hawpe before teams realize what a truly horrific outfielder he is, if they haven't already.''
Hawpe is a great player. He has a rocket of an arm and can get to the balls he should. his bat is also above average. his home/road splits are nearly similar. The colorado effect doesnt apply here and its a shame that everyone rips all Colorado players because of where they play
Posted by: lakersdodgersyankees4life | June 01, 2009 at 08:17 PM
venn177,
Last 10 games, Andruw's 8-for-38 (.210 BA) with 3 doubles, 5 BB, 12 K.
In other words, he's coming back to earth.
Posted by: ink-stained scribe | June 01, 2009 at 08:21 PM
Hawpe is a nice player, but Colorado guys always worry me. Plus, he's left handed and ideally, the need a right handed hitter.
Posted by: njbraves | June 01, 2009 at 08:22 PM
hmmm... I know Freddy Sanchez, Jack Wilson, Adam LaRoche and Nate McLouth are being shopped. What could the buccos get for them?
Posted by: EWJ867 | June 01, 2009 at 08:23 PM
"The colorado effect doesnt apply here and its a shame that everyone rips all Colorado players because of where they play"
Agreed, yet Youk and Pedroia never have to hear that argument even though they play in the most hitter friendly park in the majors for righties. Youk hit .120 higher at home last year, while Pedroia hit .70 higher. Look at what Bay is doing this season. Colorado gets an unfair bias, espescially now that the humodor is there.
Posted by: 86 Mets | June 01, 2009 at 08:27 PM
As a Cards fan I can tell you Ankiel has no trade value right now. He will need a few good weeks to show he is healthy and productive to be mentioned in trade talks. Taking a look at who may be available in the next few weeks (keep in mind many teams that still have a chance hesitate to deal impact players this early...usually mid-July is when you hear whether teams are buyers or sellers). Josh Willingham makes sense...could be had for minimal in return and the Nats are definitely sellers. He is not a star but a solid player. Another team that is definitely sellers is the Indians. Mark DeRosa will get dealt this offseason and could be a good pickup...once again...not a star studded OF...but solid. The Pads and Brian Giles is also an option. The A's are going to be sellers...and Holliday's name is going to be kicked around by a number of teams...but price tag will be high for sure. The Rox and maybe Hawpe. The Stros maybe...and Lee would be a nice addition but rumor has it he will not waive his no trade for anyone. This early it is very tough to judge...usually to get a top notch guy this early you have to pay the house for him. I don't see a deal for a big OF bat getting made for the Braves until late this month at the earliest. I am sure the key requirements is not dealing Hanson or Heyward.
Posted by: JC | June 01, 2009 at 08:28 PM
"Hawpe is a great player. He has a rocket of an arm and can get to the balls he should. his bat is also above average. his home/road splits are nearly similar. The colorado effect doesnt apply here and its a shame that everyone rips all Colorado players because of where they play"
Actually I ripped him because his defense is as bad as any outfielder in baseball. I even said that he barely has any splits, but it is still a chance. He is not a great player, he is just a very good hitter, who looks like he probably will be able to hit anywhere, but you can't say for sure. He is slower then hell and he is a brutal outfielder. That is why I ripped him. It seems as if you didn't even ready anything I wrote other then the first line.
Also, it is not a shame that people are wary of Coors hitters, seeing as how there is a laundry list of them that couldn't cut it after they left.
Posted by: nrmax88 | June 01, 2009 at 08:29 PM
Im sure theyd want a RH, but, they could go 3-4-5 like Hawpe, Chipper, McCann, where its LH, Switch, LH.
and 86 mets, agree 100%. the humador kills a lot of balls, and many games stay at 4-5 runs per game. Of course, there are the 20-19 type games, but all stadiums have those types
Posted by: lakersdodgersyankees4life | June 01, 2009 at 08:30 PM
nrmax88,
Hasn't the humidor cut down some of the home-road differential for the legit hitters? Holliday's sure evened out the final couple years he was there. Spilborghs' splits aren't that bad either, from what I recall.
Posted by: ink-stained scribe | June 01, 2009 at 08:35 PM
while we're throwing our ridiculous trade proposals how about Hanson for Jayson Werth (cost controllable for several more years at reasonable cost) and a solid 25hr 90rbi performer with above average arm and above avg speed. We'll also give back Carrasco.
So how's about it. carrasco and Werth for hanson? maybe we can throw in a low A top prospect like a Knapp or a solid AA performer like Worley?
Posted by: philsWSchamps | June 01, 2009 at 08:41 PM
while we're throwing our ridiculous trade proposals how about Hanson for Jayson Werth (cost controllable for several more years at reasonable cost) and a solid 25hr 90rbi performer with above average arm and above avg speed. We'll also give back Carrasco.
So how's about it. carrasco and Werth for hanson? maybe we can throw in a low A top prospect like a Knapp or a solid AA performer like Worley?
Posted by: philsWSchamps | June 01, 2009 at 08:41 PM
Stupid...nothing else to say
Posted by: 86 Mets | June 01, 2009 at 08:43 PM
that comment wasn't about you phils...just the scenario
Posted by: 86 Mets | June 01, 2009 at 08:44 PM
can't blame me for trying. Before his struggles this year Carrasco was considering a top prospect. He was around 50 in BA's top 100 and Werth would definitely shore up their outfield for several years. oh well. i doubt the braves and phils would deal anyways.
But a rotation in 2011 of
Hamels
Hanson
Drabek
Happ
Moyer (haha)
would look real good!
Posted by: philsWSchamps | June 01, 2009 at 08:51 PM
Phils, are you serious? Hanson wouldn't be traded for Peavy, why the hell would the braves trade him for Werth? that's really stupid
Posted by: HotlantaBalla | June 01, 2009 at 08:56 PM
Nelson cruz is perfect for the braves. Power and a little bit of speed. Would jv and frenchy low level prospect do it
Posted by: OklahomaBrave | June 01, 2009 at 08:59 PM
How about Soriano to the braves, wood and derosa to the cubs, and a major league ready pitcher to the indians plus we will throw in Gregg to the tribe. Add a mid level pitching prospect to the cubs and maybe another major league ready but future 4-5 starter to the tribe and everyone is happy. If only Soriano would waive his clause
Posted by: BOBBY P | June 01, 2009 at 09:00 PM
J V for Hamilton!!!!! That would be sweeeeeeeet! You could move him to right when Gorkys gets the call, platoon in left with GA and M Dizzy, Hamilton in center, Dero in right.
Posted by: tarheel-pck | June 01, 2009 at 09:04 PM
I think the Braves need to aquire Dero, him and Chipper are like peas in a pod. Chippers performance would increase with his buddy around cus he'll be happy with his boy around, Dero would be an upgrade in right as well.
Posted by: tarheel-pck | June 01, 2009 at 09:07 PM
"Phils, are you serious? Hanson wouldn't be traded for Peavy, why the hell would the braves trade him for Werth? that's really stupid"
Can you not smell the sarcasm he had in his statement?
Posted by: BravesRed | June 01, 2009 at 09:08 PM
of course i saw the sarcasm, it's just stupid to even post something like that
Posted by: HotlantaBalla | June 01, 2009 at 09:12 PM
Victor Martinez / Mark DeRosa and Jamey Carroll.
For Tommy Hanson / Kris Medlen / Gerardo Rodriguez/ Cody Johnson /David Francis and Jeff Francoeur
Martinez give you the power hitter 1st baseman / catcher
You can put DeRosa in the Outfielder and use him in Utility and Carroll is a upgrade in the infield defensively and can play SS and can hit some .
Posted by: baseballnuts | June 01, 2009 at 09:17 PM
THIS IS JUST FOR FUN SO DONT CALL ME A SH*THEAD for this!
Braves send:
Tommy Hanson
Jason Heyward
Casey Kotchman
Kelly Johnson
Padres Send:
Jake Peavy
Adrian Gonzalez
Heath Bell
Who hangs up first?
Posted by: bravesfansc | June 01, 2009 at 09:21 PM
Padres hang up as soon as they hear the name Adrian
Posted by: baseballnuts | June 01, 2009 at 09:23 PM
Braves should hang up. Bell is thirty one, Hanson could be a future ace and kotchman and johnson are very servicable mlb starters. Heyward could be decent too.
Posted by: BOBBY P | June 01, 2009 at 09:24 PM
I agree. Maybe if the deal had Cody Johnson (19HRS this year in A ball) instead of Heyward i would do it, but again its all just for fun.
Posted by: bravesfansc | June 01, 2009 at 09:27 PM
Braves can have soriano if they take his contract and give us two midlevel prospects
Posted by: BOBBY P | June 01, 2009 at 09:28 PM
baseballnuts, your last trade would never happen. i dont think the braves would trade hanson for derosa and martinez straight up (we already have a pretty good catcher too if you didnt know...)
Posted by: bravesfansc | June 01, 2009 at 09:29 PM
The Braves have no money =[
Posted by: bravesfansc | June 01, 2009 at 09:29 PM
Neither do the cubs right now
Posted by: BOBBY P | June 01, 2009 at 09:31 PM
Peavy will cost you at least Hanson / Medlen / Charlie Morton / plus 1 or 2 lower A position prospects.
The Padres are asking for stupid return.
Posted by: baseballnuts | June 01, 2009 at 09:32 PM
That is one of the reasons why the Cubs did not get him, and why the Braves hung up and stopped talks.
Posted by: BOBBY P | June 01, 2009 at 09:36 PM
Yeah and the Braves dont need another SP right now.
I think our offer for Jake in the offseason was something like:
Escobar
Schafer
Reyes/Locke (both suck)
Boyer (ha)
I would only regret losing Esco and maybe Schafer in that deal (Schafer has oozing potential, but hes hitting .204 right now). Both Jojo and Locke have sucked this year and Boyer was DFA.
Posted by: bravesfansc | June 01, 2009 at 09:38 PM
Braves will not trade Hanson, so just stop. Also, Andruw Jones has been below average away from Arlington this season, still an upgrade over what we have but not by too much. Right now the trade targets look to be Luke Scott, Mark DeRosa, Josh Willingham, etc. Those type of hitters and not the big names like Alfonso Soriano.
Posted by: bravesfan22193 | June 01, 2009 at 09:43 PM
hotlantaballa,
uh ya i was kidding hence the "while we're making ridiculous trade proposals" in my original post.
I know i'm gonna piss off some braves fans with the following post but i don't care.
oh and if the braves don't watch it, in a year or so they could be very similar to the giants. All pitching, very little bats. Other than McCann (chipper's gotta retire sometime) all their offensive stars are in lower levels. Ya you've got Escobar who's pretty good, Johnson who can be OK but they're not a strong offensive team. THey may need some inexpensive major league ready talent. not saying werth is the answer but it something if i were a braves fan I would be concerned about.
oh and if i was a braves fan i wouldn't go off and trade someone of huge value like a Hanson although I would like it if Wren was replaced by Ed Wade sometime soon!
Posted by: philsWSchamps | June 01, 2009 at 09:47 PM
on july 3rd, if the braves dont need power, there will be an OF hitting about 400 on the dodgers who will be available. just so you know...
Posted by: lakersdodgersyankees4life | June 01, 2009 at 08:07 PM
The braves are reportedly looking for a power hitter, juan pierre is a terrible fit.
Posted by: 86 Mets | June 01, 2009 at 08:10 PM
If Frank Wren is so dumb that he is going to limit offensive production to home runs then someone please fire him now. Juan Pierre would lite the Braves offense on fire. He would lead off! Any time you put guys on base in front of chipper you are going to score runs. Not to mention the guy can steal and play some mean defense. He also wants out of LA. Homeruns are great. yeah, chicks dig them. But do you really think there is a guy out there smashing balls out of the yard whose team isnt going to ask an arm and a leg? The answer is no! So please use some intelligence and start looking for other answers. Juan will cost a lot less than any of those Holliday or Bay pipe dreams and honestly will help out the Braves far more in the end.
Posted by: Phillip_Cannon | June 01, 2009 at 09:53 PM
My solution for the Braves hitting woes this season and next would be first to call up the Orioles and propose a package for Luke Scott built around Charlie Morton. Orioles fans can come on here and say it isn't fair value and so on, but the fact of the matter is the orioles have an excess of outfielders and the Braves have excess pitching. Neither is elite, but Morton instantly goes into their rotation and has the talent to be a middle of the rotation starter. Obviously the Braves would add 1 or 2 more prospects to the offer. Plug Scott into right field and watch the offense improve big time with the addition of him and the subtraction of Frenchy. If Anderson continues to struggle then we can scrounge together a package for Josh Willingham of the Nats. I'd play it out for the rest of 2009 with that roster and see how far it can go.
Then in the offseason, barring a setback for hanson/hudson, we can afford to move Vazquez for prospects (preferably 3B). With the money saved by moving Vazquez and Gonzalez or Soriano walking in FA we can make a serious attempt at Matt Holliday. I understand he isn't the hitter we thought he was at coors but just look at his May numbers and you see he is still an all star talent. Plug him in behind Chipper and in front of McCann and all three benefit
Posted by: bravesfan22193 | June 01, 2009 at 09:56 PM
phils, if we were going to go for a young, cost controlled player like werth, why not go to LA and shoot for a player like ethier?
and i have another name that i dont think ive heard on here yet, elijiah dukes? i know he's a hothead with some problems, but bobby cox managed to straiten out sheffield a few years ago why not him?
or call up the blue jays and try to piece together a package for alex rios? there are a huge number of options that havent even been talked about yet, and im willing to wager that its going to be something unexpected like that that frank wren pulls the trigger on
Posted by: atlbraves08 | June 01, 2009 at 10:04 PM
I agree with Phillip actually. Pierre gives a legit speed threat as well as someone who can play CF and give Schafer time off every now and then without castrating the OF defense as a whole like putting Diaz in center does.
Big problem is of course Pierre's contract and the fact ATL can't really afford to pay any of it.
Posted by: l0stnumber | June 01, 2009 at 10:06 PM
washington is looking to move Willingham/Kearns not Dukes or Dunn. Don't know what it would take in terms of prospects to get rios but I know he has a nice sized contract attached to him
Posted by: bravesfan22193 | June 01, 2009 at 10:06 PM
atlbraves08,
yes given the option of Ethier or Werth yes Ethier is the much better player. not sure if the Dodgers give him up though as easily as we would Werth considering we have taylor who is basically ready for AAA now.
Dukes I'd stay away from. I konw your talk of Sheff and all but Dukes went nuts on some fans in a game i watched last year of the Nats and Mets. Doesn't seem like Atlanta's kind of player and how much longer is Cox going to manage anyway? You could calm him for a bit but then he'd go back to being nuts with Cox' replacement. I'd look elsewhere.
Posted by: philsWSchamps | June 01, 2009 at 10:11 PM
You know what is amazing is how there is so much hype for Hawpe, but when you bring Luke Scott's name into the conversation Braves fans don't want him. WHY???
Take a look at the numbers Scott is easily more valuable than Hawpe. Age is negligible as Scott is only one year older. Contract is distinctly in Scott's favor. Hawpe is making $5.5 this year, $7.5 next year and has a $10 club option for 2011. But he can void the option and become an FA if he is traded. Scott is making $2.4 this year and is a Super Two player so he is under team control for another 3 years.
Fielding is also in Scott's favor by a big margin. Now I know most people will think since Scott is a DH he can't field. But that is pretty far from the truth. He has posted a positive UZR/150 rating every season (yes its negative this year but he's only played in the field a few times) with a his career number at 7.8 in left field, and 4.8 total. Hawpe on the other hand has been truly awful in the outfield. He has been in the negative column for every year with the exception of 2006, and has a career rating of -20.8. That's a 25.5 swing between the two outfielders, that is insane.
On offense its widely considered that Hawpe is the much bigger force but thats not entirely true. Hawpe has a career .287/.378/.502 and Scott has a career line of .272/.358/.512. A .009 difference in OPS is not a significant difference. What's even more surprising is that Scott out hits Hawpe vs. LHP .817-.762, despite usually being considered a platoon player.
I think Braves fans should take a real long hard look at Scott b/c to me he seems like the perfect fit for their outfield.
Posted by: Steveo26 | June 01, 2009 at 10:22 PM
I want Shin-Soo Choo.
Posted by: BravesRed | June 01, 2009 at 10:24 PM
the dodgers love Ethier. he was our steal of the century from Billy Beane, and we wont give him up without getting some SERIOUS pitching
Posted by: lakersdodgersyankees4life | June 01, 2009 at 10:26 PM
i guess all i was getting at by bringing up ethier's name was to say that if it were me trading hanson for a young, cost controlled OF..i think it would have to be one of kemp/ethier/rasmus/bruce it would have to be a YOUNG phenom OF...i think thats all i was getting at there
Posted by: atlbraves08 | June 01, 2009 at 10:36 PM
BravesRed,
i was gonna suggest him (Choo) as well as Hunter Pence and matt Kemp (although Dodgers don't need pitching as much as some others but the Astros sure could).
and atlbraves08,
for all the talk of rios, Werth's stats are better than his even with Werth in a prolonged slump. And before you say its his park he's much faster than Rios and 6 of his 8 HR's have come on the road including a huge upper deck blast to the "pitchers side" of Yankee Stadium.
oh and a recent survey of i believe it was major league GM's listed Werth as one of the two most underrated players in the game today. If he puts it all together he could steal 30 bases and hit 25 hr's plus play a solid OF.
Again my though was outlandish I admit as you don't trade a true #1 in the making in hanson (maybe somewhat out of fear of facing him later this year and for at least 6 years after that and I realize we have OF's in waiting in Dom Brown (in High A and should've been moved already) and Taylor in AA also should be moved to AAA.
Posted by: philsWSchamps | June 01, 2009 at 10:46 PM
out of absolute pure curiosity, who hangs up the phone...
straight up, hanson for jay bruce??
as much as im looking forward to seeing hanson, i would have to think VERY long and hard about something like that
Posted by: atlbraves08 | June 01, 2009 at 11:02 PM
I think they both would hang up at the same time.
Posted by: BravesRed | June 01, 2009 at 11:07 PM
bravesred... thats kind of what i was thinking
interesting idea thought
Posted by: atlbraves08 | June 01, 2009 at 11:09 PM
braves hang up. you never trade great pitching for great hitting unless the hitter is that much MORE great than the pitcher which he's not.
Posted by: philsWSchamps | June 01, 2009 at 11:10 PM
I feel left out:
Lance Berkman for Frederick Freeman, Gorkys Hernandez and Jeff Franceour.
Move Kotchman to LF.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | June 01, 2009 at 11:35 PM
"I doubt Texas will be seller's...they have the best record in the AL, and that division isn't looking as goo as people thought before the season"
Who thought the AL West would be any good this season? Every team coming in had problems.
Posted by: nut bunnies | June 01, 2009 at 11:36 PM
I wonder if the Yanks would still be interested in moving Swisher if we give them a package involving Francoeur. At this point, Francoeur has a better average, but Nick's got more homeruns.
Posted by: BraveNewWorld | June 02, 2009 at 12:09 AM
What about trading for hank blaylock?
Posted by: RollTide1930 | June 02, 2009 at 12:13 AM
Id take adam jones for hanson. He would dominate the national league.
Posted by: RollTide1930 | June 02, 2009 at 12:16 AM
Can Hank Blalock play RF?
Posted by: homeofdabrave | June 02, 2009 at 12:19 AM
No but we can move Chipper out there surely...
Posted by: BraveNewWorld | June 02, 2009 at 12:38 AM
"I want Shin-Soo Choo."
Too bad
Posted by: the lowercase zach is better | June 02, 2009 at 12:40 AM
I bet Blaylock could play right field and the rangers would probably be willing to trade for some pitching maybe morton/frenchy/low level prospect.
Posted by: RollTide1930 | June 02, 2009 at 12:46 AM
What would it take to pry Rios from the Jays? Guy is a 5 tool player.
Posted by: s17 | June 02, 2009 at 12:55 AM
It's great fun playing GM isn't it? Especially if you have a lot of pieces and some holes to fill.
If you don't want to give up anything why not sign Bonds? Did they blow their chance in not signing Sheffield?
If the prospects you don't want to give up are so great, why not move some of them up? Atlanta only has to look at their own history to see that GREAT young players can make a difference. Chipper Jones and Andruw both came up very young. When young players are going to be great, they just are. Braun, Longoria, Howard...So Schafer wasn't quite ready. OK, who is next?
I bet the Royals will give up Guillen for a song. Gotta make the money match though so it won't be that cheap, Vazquez for Guillen straight up. They cost the same, for the same length of time. They give the other team what they need.
Posted by: IamWeasel | June 02, 2009 at 01:38 AM
"My solution for the Braves hitting woes this season and next would be first to call up the Orioles and propose a package for Luke Scott built around Charlie Morton. Orioles fans can come on here and say it isn't fair value and so on, but the fact of the matter is the orioles have an excess of outfielders and the Braves have excess pitching. Neither is elite, but Morton instantly goes into their rotation and has the talent to be a middle of the rotation starter."
I'm sorry but Morton does not headline a deal for a Luke Scott. Scott is not a rental or a salary dump. The O's don't HAVE to get rid of him. Morton doesn't scream prospect much less middle of the rotation starter. You are correct when you assess that pitching is the O's weakness but they need tangible starters not guys who have a 6.15 ERA in 15 starts in the NL. Morton is 25 now so him succeeding at AAA isn't that impressive, its expected. Morton would be behind the 3 O's rookie starters up with the team right now. Also he'd be behind guys like Matusz, Tillman, Arrieta, Erbe and Patton in the minors. Of those 8 pitchers Morton is at least two years older than all of them with the exception of Berken. And all 8 of those pitchers have had more success than Morton and seem to possess better stuff.
I can at least make the case that the Braves NEED Scott you can't make the case that the O's NEED much less want Morton. Scott's 11 HR are more then the Braves top 4 OF's and 1B combined. Now i'm not trying to say that the Braves should give up Heyward or Hanson for Scott. I'm just saying they need to give up actual talent, not some 2nd tier prospect.
Posted by: Steveo26 | June 02, 2009 at 03:09 AM