![]() |
|
|
| |
« Odds and Ends: Glavine, McLouth, Ross | Main | La Russa: Cards Seek Big Bat »
According to SNY's Kevin Burkhardt, Jose Reyes has a tear in his right hamstring tendon. The Mets will wait till Friday to make a decision on the matter, but Burkhardt guesses Reyes will be sidelined till the All-Star break.
So what are the Mets' options? Alex Cora is currently holding the line at short. Should they pursue someone like, say, Bobby Crosby? Mark Grudzielanek is still out there as a free agent, but he hasn't played shortstop in a while. What do you think?
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
Tejada?
Posted by: bkoke | June 04, 2009 at 08:21 PM
Tejada's definitely a name to throw in the mix. What do you think he'd command?
Posted by: Eddie Schmid | June 04, 2009 at 08:25 PM
i like it but reyes is only out for a month, so what do we do with him when reyes comes back if we got tejada?
I say stick with cora and trade kon niese, eddie kunz, and nick evans for jermaine dye
Posted by: johan is GOD | June 04, 2009 at 08:26 PM
JON NIESE not kon
Posted by: johan is GOD | June 04, 2009 at 08:26 PM
what about mark derosa? we need a player that can hit and play SS and he can do both.
Posted by: metsfan08 | June 04, 2009 at 08:27 PM
cant do that because reyes is only out a mont, so trade niese kunz and evans or something like that for dye
Posted by: johan is GOD | June 04, 2009 at 08:27 PM
Sign Damion Easley!
Posted by: andrew643 | June 04, 2009 at 08:28 PM
I'm not crazy about DeRosa, he isn't much of a SS.
I think Crosby is the easiest to get. Tejada would provide better production but where do you play him when Reyes comes back?
Of course, Reyes may not come back. So do you take the wait-and-see approach and then get someone better or do you get someone lesser now? Very difficult decision.
Posted by: icedrake523 | June 04, 2009 at 08:33 PM
Cora is good enough, no doubt.
I'm a big Mets fan, but really -- there's no way way we can replace Reyes in an effective way. The Mets can't afford to trade for stop-gaps. They're better off muddling through, hoping to stay competitive with a Murphy/Castillo/Cora/Wright infield, and if they can't, oh well.
Posted by: DanDotLewis | June 04, 2009 at 08:37 PM
jack wilson?
Posted by: kevin1013 | June 04, 2009 at 08:39 PM
Big Mets fan here too, I think Cora is good enough to be our everyday SS.
However, Omar has to get on the phone and he has to trade for a big HR/RBI bat for this lineup. We could use a Holliday or a Carlos Lee. We need to provide for the lost RBIs/Power of Delgado.
Cora was really helping the team subbing for Reyes a few weeks ago, hopefully he keeps it up.
Posted by: andrew643 | June 04, 2009 at 08:39 PM
On Twitter, someone jokingly replied, saying "Trade for Mike Bordick."
That pretty much sums it up in my book.
Posted by: DanDotLewis | June 04, 2009 at 08:43 PM
I think we can live with Alex Cora at SS.....however, we need to trade for a big bat...either Adam Dunn, Carlos Lee or Jermaine Dye...there is only so much Carlos Beltran and Gary Sheffield can do...Omar needs to be a GM already and stop waiting....waiting is not going to help this team
Posted by: Metsfanatic79 | June 04, 2009 at 08:43 PM
I am sorry, a slight tear of the hamstring and the guy could be back at all star break?!?!?! are you guys listening to yourselves?
No matter what size tear there is to a hamstring, its the hamstring and Reyes is someone who NEEDS his legs for his game.
A tear to me means surgery, surgery means more than 6 weeks for recovery, rehab and getting back into game shape. In my opinion Reyes is done for the season..... this is not a strain, its a friggen TEAR.
Posted by: PIGEON | June 04, 2009 at 08:50 PM
Mets should look at Crosby... maybe Christian Guzman.... crap, maybe even Orlando Cabrera.... The A's & Nats are going no where.
The Mets are desperate and need a 1B, and OF, and starting pitching... teams are going to rob the Mets blind for the players you guys want.... Dye, Lee, Victor Martinez etc. Any of those guys is going to cost Fernando Martinez and Bobby Parnell for starters..... Omar has done a terrible job and to save his own rear end, he will trade away the few things left on the farm and leave the mets in despair after he is fired at seasons end when the Mets dont make the playoffs again
Posted by: PIGEON | June 04, 2009 at 08:54 PM
I bet yall would take that Derrek Lee for Jose Reyes trade right about now LOL
But I dont think the Cubs would go for it anymore :)
Posted by: namesake49 | June 04, 2009 at 08:55 PM
Unfortunately for the Mets they don't have that much trade bait. The oft mentioned Jon Niese is a back of the rotation guy. Kunz and Parnell? Okay but relievers will get you only so much. F-Mart? There just isn't that much there.
Posted by: MickS | June 04, 2009 at 09:02 PM
I do not think SS wise they should do much right now, unless it was a Crosby, Orlando Cabrera or Jack Wilson on the cheap. That is also considering Reyes will miss serious serious time (all season) because it is a lot of speculation as it stands.
Otherwise they need another bat at 1B or LF/RF to put them into the talks of winning the NL.
A name that would be a huge impact bat now and moving forward... Carlos Lee. If they can add some salary this season, it seems possible without emptying the farm because he makes so much. 18.5M till 2012, the Stros could unload tons of payroll with him, Valverde and Tejada this season and improve overall.
Posted by: MrMet | June 04, 2009 at 09:06 PM
yeah that would possibaly be the worst trade in the history of trades for derek lee. But i agree with andrew643 and metsfantic 79, they need a big bat, and dye or lee wouldn't cost parnell and martinez, one because they are older than 30 and have huge contracts. More like muphy niese kunz, evans, something along those lines for carlos lee or jermaine dye, preferably lee
Posted by: johan is GOD | June 04, 2009 at 09:06 PM
Grudz was an epic fail SS even 10 years ago (the last time he played more than 4 games in a season there). No reason to think accelerated age would help him there.
Posted by: Sour Bob | June 04, 2009 at 09:08 PM
I like Orlando Cabrera. Jack Wilson is expensive. Let's get Cabrera and Holliday in the same deal. I don't want DeRosa playing SS. He hasn't been a regular SS in 7 or 8 years. Would Houston be willing to trade away Miguel Tejada?
Posted by: Brian | June 04, 2009 at 09:09 PM
They might almost be looking to unload Carlos Lee and his contract on a team, it may not require a load of talent.
Posted by: MrMet | June 04, 2009 at 09:09 PM
4 years/ 74 million left on that deal.. woah.
Posted by: MrMet | June 04, 2009 at 09:10 PM
The Mets have to do something drastic. When you have a stadium for the cheapest non nose bleed seat is 80 bucks, the current product is unacceptable. Granted it's not their fault all these guys got injured but with 35 million coming off the books in the off season, they need to take on some salary this year and make a respectable run at the Phillies for the Eastern division
Posted by: Brian | June 04, 2009 at 09:15 PM
Carlos Lee has a farm in Houston and a NTC. I believe he's on record as saying he's not waiving that NTC. For ONCE Mets fans, be realistic (unlike Omar). Bobby Crosby is the only SS you'll be able to end up with.
Posted by: maximumpotential | June 04, 2009 at 09:28 PM
Im a Cubs fan first, but a Mets fan second (every Cubs fan has to have a second since we so rarely make the playoffs lol). I honestly thought at the time that Derrek Lee for Jose Reyes was a good deal for both teams. Sad to say, that it is no longer a good deal for the Cubs.
But I think the Mets need a good defensive SS, and that would be Jack Wilson. IMHO...he is their best choice for a replacement for Reyes.
Posted by: namesake49 | June 04, 2009 at 09:35 PM
How does it make any sense to go after Bobby Crosby when the Mets already have Alex Cora? But yeah, they do have to do something about their offense.
Posted by: drphonic7 | June 04, 2009 at 09:45 PM
Derrek Lee for Reyes, and that is a bad trade for the Cubs??? A 34 year old 1st baseman who has not driven in 100+ since 2005. His numbers are starting to slow, in the midst of a very slow season. Owed 13M next season ---> for a 25 year old all star shortstop who is entering his physical prime, one of the fastest players in the league, great glove, loads of more potential to touch and signed through 2011. What with this trade? I think the Cubs would make that trade, regardless of this injury... eh?
Posted by: MrMet | June 04, 2009 at 09:46 PM
As for this season, I really do not know anymore what kind of moves they need or could make. There is a thin line in going for it and going for it now and not giving up the future... a trade for anyone who is a rental, is basically a waste. NO way F-Mart goes anywhere for anyone. It is counter-productive. Cora can handle SS for now, especially when compared to the replacement options, how much of an upgrade is Bobby Crosby over Cora? Even Cabrera or Jack Wilson? For now they need to sit tight and look at middle of the lineup type bats that will not cost them the farm (F-Mart). IMO
Posted by: MrMet | June 04, 2009 at 09:51 PM
I honestly thought at the time that Derrek Lee for Jose Reyes was a good deal for both teams.
Posted by: drphonic7 | June 04, 2009 at 09:45 PM
I've seen some stupid things on this site, but this one might take the cake. After that deal maybe the cubbies can give the cards some salary relief and swap Bobby Scales for Pujols.
Posted by: 86 Mets | June 04, 2009 at 09:54 PM
This team was going to need either a big bat or another starter anyway, hopefully this gets Omar moving in that direction sooner rather than later. I'd almost be surprised at this point to find out that the Mets didn't put in a claim on Padilla, so they can use their chips towards acquiring a big bat.
Posted by: 86 Mets | June 04, 2009 at 10:01 PM
Scales for Pujols? Sounds like a good deal to me LOL
Maybe the Cubs would go for the trade and continue in the meantime with what they have until Reyes comes back from his injury. But I dont think the Cubs would do it because both Theriot and Fontenot are cheaper in the longterm, and they dont need a leadoff man.
I see Fontenot as a super utility man, and Theriot as a 2nd baseman. Longterm, Reyes would fit great in the SS position. Where we hit him in the lineup...who knows???
But after being called stupid by several people, I still think the DLee for Reyes trade would have been very beneficial to both clubs a month ago...and it still may be.
Posted by: namesake49 | June 04, 2009 at 10:02 PM
ok... namesake49, go read up on every baseball book ever written, each baseball tonight and maybe, just maybe, you can start commenting on this site in 2 years.
Posted by: johan is GOD | June 04, 2009 at 10:07 PM
LOL....funny comment johan....and it may be true.
Posted by: namesake49 | June 04, 2009 at 10:18 PM
Um, why trade for someone if Reyes is only gonna be out for 6 weeks?
I saw a lot of Cora back when he was in Boston. He's definitely a great guy to plug into the lineup for a few weeks.
Posted by: Umair | June 04, 2009 at 10:37 PM
this is not a strain, its a friggen TEAR.'
you dont get it, a strain is a tear. its a way to say in public that it isnt completly torn, and not to get everyone scared. Remember S. Drew early this yr, he was out 6 weeks with a 'strain'
johan is GOD, you have some relationship with Dye and Lee? Lee has over 70m coming his way, along with a NTC. Dye has 2 more yrs, and the Sox wont give away Dye. They arent BAD hitters, but they probably arent what the mets need. they should sweat it out, wait for a McLouth-type deal for a slugger to come up in July, or sign their future slugger next yr.
Posted by: lakersdodgersyankees4life | June 04, 2009 at 11:30 PM
3 points here...
1. a tear does not equal surgery. a small tear that is not at the tendon can be rehab'd in 4-6 weeks. at the tendon, if it is more than 70% torn, than surgery may be the only option. that DOES NOT appear to be the case here. He will be back post ASB
2. The problem isnt losing Reyes...the problem is losing a leadoff hitter while not having a power guy in the lineup.
3. The Mets cant sell...there is nothing to sell. We aren't selling Reyes, Wright, or Beltran. The only people we would trade are all injured in Putz, Church, Ollie, Delgado, Wags, even Pagan...yikes. Or Castillo, which would happen regardless.
Cora + Valdez are fine at SS. We need power bat preferably at 1b. Huff, Johnson, or Cantu would be perfect. If Lee can be convinced to come to NY, then he is a no brainer.
The only thing this changes is that instead of trying to rent an impact SP for this year...they will have to move on an "under contract SP" and pony up the prospects. Or settle for Padilla or Pedro...or better yet, Sheets.
Its far from over yet. We still have Wright, Beltran, & Sheff. with potential in FMart, Murph, + Church.
This is where Omar really earns the extension he was already given.
Posted by: whatdatmean | June 04, 2009 at 11:47 PM
J.J. Putz is headed to New York to have his sore right elbow examined and Newsday's David Lennon writes that "surgery seems like the logical next step."
Putz is bothered by a bone spur in his elbow that doesn't allow him to finish pitches. "I'm not following through because it hurts," Putz said. Putz lost his eighth-inning responsibilities to Bobby Parnell on Wednesday. Jun. 4 - 5:11 pm et
Source: Newsday
The mets will not trade Martinez, Neise or Murphy so do they have the depth to pull off a trade for a big bat?? I don't think so.... with Putz hurt they can not trade Parnell neither. The Mets are going to have to hold off and see whats out there, no need to get someone big for SS if Reyes is coming back. They need a Pitcher and a Bat but i think they will only get one of those.
Posted by: nathan | June 04, 2009 at 11:54 PM
On the contrary...
Parnell, FMart, Flores, Thole, + Holt are going nowhere. As they are considered cornerstones of our future. However, outside of that, the Mets will move parts bc all their depth is at the lower levels.
I would expect to see guys like Niese, Gee, Broadway, Kunz, Murphy, Marte, Antonini, etc be available to land someone.
It may be feasible to bring in an Oswalt for something like niese, murphy, + prospect. PLUS landing a guy like huff, johnson, or DeRosa using ML caliber P trading someone like Gee, Antonini, Broadway, or Kunz.
Please...we just saw Atl fleece the Bucco's...maybe the Mets will have some luck[finally]
Posted by: whatdatmean | June 05, 2009 at 12:09 AM
The conversation left this track a while ago, but I really don't think the Miguel Tejada idea is that terrible. It seems a bit weird, but its actually a decent fit. Hear me out:
1. Its a pure salary dump for the Astros. If the Mets will take on his salary, they can probably get him for virtually nothing. One mediocre prospect and some organizational fodder at most.
2. If/when Reyes comes back, if Delgado does not, he's probably a guy you can move to first base. He's pretty poor at SS anyway, someone you'd need to keep Wilson Valdez around to back up, but he probably has enough bat to give the Mets more than they currently have at 1B. He might not maintain a .395 wOBA all year, but if he were acquired today, could be worth nearly a full win over the Mets replacement SSes for the time Reyes needs to miss, and then perhaps even another full win over what the Mets have at 1B through the seasons final three months.
3. If Reyes AND Delgado come back, he'd probably turn into someone you can use to share time with Castillo at 2B.
4. He's a free agent at the end of the year, so there's no long term commitment. He'll probably even be a Type A, but offering him arbitration would also probably be risky unless you're willing to make him a full time 1B next year.
Posted by: MEddler | June 05, 2009 at 12:09 AM
I highly doubt that the Mets will trade Fmart or Parnell, But I'd be surprised if Niese isn't available in the right deal. I would hesitate to call Murphy one of their more valuable chips either. Holt and Mejia are both in AA, and they are both pitching very well. Josh Thole is putting up great numbers in AA, and catchers always have value. They have a ton of younger high upside guys to deal, all of them are a little further aay, but they do have them. If the right bat is there, I'm sure the Mets have the ammo to get it, it just depends how badly they want to deplete their farm.
Posted by: 86 Mets | June 05, 2009 at 12:10 AM
"On the contrary...
Parnell, FMart, Flores, Thole, + Holt are going nowhere. As they are considered cornerstones of our future. However, outside of that, the Mets will move parts bc all their depth is at the lower levels.
I would expect to see guys like Niese, Gee, Broadway, Kunz, Murphy, Marte, Antonini, etc be available to land someone.
It may be feasible to bring in an Oswalt for something like niese, murphy, + prospect. PLUS landing a guy like huff, johnson, or DeRosa using ML caliber P trading someone like Gee, Antonini, Broadway, or Kunz.
Please...we just saw Atl fleece the Bucco's...maybe the Mets will have some luck[finally]"
I agree with this. I definitely think Niese and/or Murphy are movable in the right deal. The only guys I really can't see moving are Holt, Martinez and Flores. I don't think they would be in a rush to move Mejia or Thole either, but I think anybody else is pretty much on the table. I like the Tejada deal, as he is a rental, and I am starting to warm up to the idea of Matt Holliday also, though I really don't know what Beane would want for the rental. I guess we will have to rely on the sheer grit and clutchness of Mr. Speed Stick Santos, and his gritty .270 something OBP.
Posted by: nrmax88 | June 05, 2009 at 12:17 AM
I think if the Mets were willing to move Mejia to Double-A already, he's probably pretty untouchable. His hype level is going to be off the charts if he's remotely successful in Double-A as a 19 year old. If Holt and Mejia both manage life in Bingo and Fernando completes his graduation, the two Righties might wind up as the Mets #1 and #2 prospects. And Mejia could be #1. Then again, Flores could still have a ridiculous second half and make a bid for that spot.
Posted by: MEddler | June 05, 2009 at 12:23 AM
I really think at this point that aubrey huff would be a great choice. He can Play 1st for the time being, and can man left if delgado comes back. I'm fine with Cora at short, I think the biggest issue is adding a little more power to the lineup. I really like the idea of claiming Padilla off waivers. He's an adequate #4 type starter and won't cost any prospects. He'd be an immediate upgrade to Redding.
Posted by: 86 Mets | June 05, 2009 at 12:27 AM
Completely agree MEddler, those two and Fmart are the Mets best prospects. I'd rather see the Mets plan as If both Reyes and Delgado will be back, and try to improve enough to stay in the hunt until then.
Posted by: 86 Mets | June 05, 2009 at 12:31 AM
Could we be so lucky to get the opportunity to kill 2 birds with 1 stone?
a.A's-Holliday + Cabrera
b.Hou-2 of Tejada/Lee/Keppinger
c.Was-Dunn/Johnson + Belliard
d.Flo-Bonafacio + Cantu
e.Col-Barmes + Hawpe/Helton
f.Tex-Vizquel + Byrd
aside from option a...they all should not be too expensice and will all make a major difference.
Sign 1 of Sheets, Padilla, or Pedro so we don't have to watch Redding anymore.
Posted by: whatdatmean | June 05, 2009 at 12:33 AM
Whatdatmean...I don't think the Mets would have any interest in Belliard or Bonafacio, as 2nd base isn't really an issue. Neither one of them would be remotely capable shortstops. I can only imagine what Beane would want for that pair, but I think it's fair to say the Mets won't pony up that much for 2 rentals. Those 2 definately wont be cheap.
Texas is leading their division, and have no reason to trade anyone on their ML roster. Teams in their position try to improve depth, in case they run into injuries. If anything, they'll be buyers.
Posted by: 86 Mets | June 05, 2009 at 12:41 AM
meddler
as much as i dislike miguel tejada, he would make perfect sense for the mets right now, and you do make some great points
however, if we take on that salary dump, then would you be ok with miguel tejada as the "big mid season move" we were almost guaranteed when they did not go after manny? listen, i love this team, they have played as a cohesive unit with all of the injuries... but we do need some help, but i dont think miguel tejada is the answer
Posted by: wright is my boy | June 05, 2009 at 12:52 AM
To me, the real question is why the hell is Jose Reyes running around if he is in a position to hurt himself by going all out. After what happened with Church last year, how is there even the slightest chance this team can rush one of their most important pieces back to soon? What the hell is wrong with the Mets medical staff? Holy crap. Lets just hope that Jerry Manuel doesn't get a boner for Wilson Valdez while Reyes is out and we end up trading Jose Reyes for some busted ex first rounder.
Posted by: nrmax88 | June 05, 2009 at 01:06 AM
wright is my boy,
Completely different situation with Manny. The big thing is the luxury tax. I'm not sure how payrolls are calculated given midseason acquisitions, but Manny would have no doubt put the Mets over the line, a line that the Wilpons have consistently expressed a distinct aversion to crossing. Assuming Tejada's contract calculations in terms of the Mets payroll for the luxury tax is prorated, its likely he'd push them close but keep them a bit under. He'd probably use up the buffer Omar left himself in the offseason, but it'd mean no more big money acquisitions in all likelihood without some sort of salary dump (It'd also expose the flaw in giving guys like Cora, who I don't mind, or Redding, who I do, multimillion dollar deals, neither of them was worth that).
In regard to the "this is a cohesive unit" argument, I will say that Gary Sheffield was seen as someone who could throw a wrench into that with his last second acquisition, but instead, he's been the team's saving grace.
I just don't see too many other acquisitions that would just about guarantee the Mets at least a 1.5-2 win upgrade if Jose and/or Delgado have to miss significantly more time than anticipated. At least, a 1.5-2 win upgrade without giving up significant prospects.
Huff's an interesting thought, but that'd be putting a lot of responsibility on Beltran defensively if Delgado does come back and Huff moves to the outfield, and with his knee injury, Beltran's actually a bit below par in that department so far this year. You'd pretty much be relying on Sheffield and Huff to play RF and LF, respectively. Two guys who essentially hadn't played any outfield in two years.
I don't hate the Huff idea, but I think I'd prefer Tejada. Assuming he winds up in the outfield, I just don't see how he's a huge upgrade over piecing things together with Fernando, Sheffield, Tatis, and Church. You have an interesting group there with nice complimentary skills. Then again, relying on Jerry to exploit that properly may be asking too much. Still, Huff would probably cost more in terms of prospects than Tejada, though if the McLouth deal set the market rates, Huff shouldn't cost THAT much.
Posted by: MEddler | June 05, 2009 at 01:08 AM
" but i dont think miguel tejada is the answer"
Not a Mets fan, just wondering from the outside if getting Tejada and his extremely limited range at SS, along with good bat and probably fairly high cost would be better than acquiring OC, or Jack Wilson at their probably lower cost, even though they are not going to hit nearly as well, but field much better?
Reason am asking this, is Boston without Lowrie at SS has had to make due with Lugo and Nick Green at SS and Lugo is both worthless with bat and glove, yet Nick Green has done exceptionally well with the bat, yet is not good at all with the glove and it has cost games, both his range and errors. Is it worth it to get a bat over a glove in Tejada? I know that I at least would prefer a stable glove guy myself (Lowrie) with a decent/average bat over a guy hitting .290 (Green) than go for a guy with questionable range/defense in Tejada, but that is just me.
Posted by: johns | June 05, 2009 at 01:11 AM
MEddler, I honestly think the value of both Huff and Tejada will be about equal. Jorge Cantu would be the other name I'd really have interest in if he can be had.
Posted by: 86 Mets | June 05, 2009 at 01:20 AM
johns,
The appeal in Tejada, as I see it, is that he could move to 1B and be adequate should the need arise once Jose's back. He has been atrocious at SS defensively, yes, but with a .395 wOBA, he's also already generated about 1.4 WAR. That means, on his current pace, he'd be worth about 3 more wins as a SS for the rest of the season. Even if his offense normalizes a bit, he should still be worth at least a couple wins in the season's final few months, and for the Mets, so long as Jose is injured, those wins are all profit, since their in house replacements are just that, replacement level. At 1B, even if Tejada puts up something like a .350 wOBA, in line with his career mark, that'd still probably be at least a one win upgrade over the Tatis/Murphy platoon unless those two find a way to completely turn their seasons around (.317, .312 wOBA for Tatis and Murph, respectively).
If both Reyes and Delgado do manage to come back, then all of a sudden you have a good problem to have, and can experiment with Tejada at 2B a bit even. Then, at the end of the year, you can either let him walk, or offer him arbitration and tell him that if he accepts, he'll be the full time first baseman. My bet is he declines, but even if he accepts, could be worse. It pretty much just means no Nick Johnson or Aubrey Huff, but at the same time a one year commitment to an average bat. Oh well, no biggie. If he declines, you get a two draft pick bonus.
Posted by: MEddler | June 05, 2009 at 01:25 AM
"MEddler, I honestly think the value of both Huff and Tejada will be about equal. Jorge Cantu would be the other name I'd really have interest in if he can be had. "
I won't argue with any of that. If the Marlins are willing to deal Cantu within the division, awesome, but he'd cost some legitimate prospects. I don't know if that's quite worth it, and at the very least, I wouldn't deal for Cantu in a panic. I'd wait until the deadline, hoping that the McLouth deal winds up depressing the value of established players a bit on the trade market, and at which point you'll probably know if Delgado will be back.
Posted by: MEddler | June 05, 2009 at 01:28 AM
I bet yall would take that Derrek Lee for Jose Reyes trade right about now LOL
But I dont think the Cubs would go for it anymore :)
----------------------
Go and find my reply to the last time you posted about this.
There is NO CHANCE that the Mets would trade Reyes for Lee. EVER.
Just stop.
Youre an idiot.
Posted by: xethicx | June 05, 2009 at 02:27 AM
I also see a whole lot of "we"'s in this and so many other threads.
I love when people say "we" when talking about their favourite sports team. To realize how nuts you people sound think about how youd react if you ever heard someone saying "we" in regard to their favourite band. Like "wow we played an amazing show tonight" or "we should add some older hits to the setlist for the next show".
Youre not on the team, youre not on the staff, that means there is no "we" to the equation.
Posted by: xethicx | June 05, 2009 at 02:30 AM
I love when people say they love something but they really mean they hate it.
Posted by: MEddler | June 05, 2009 at 02:47 AM
I understand your point about the lux tax, but I was just using Manny as an example. A lot of players could have been had cheap (O-dog, Abreu, Garland, etc) but instead, and i tended to agree, and still do, to wait it out and go with what we had. I fully expect the Mets to make moves come the deadline, whether it be for a complimentary bat, or a back of the rotation guy. That being said, if the Mets were to take on a contract i would like it being a player worth the money we saved by not signing one or more of the above mentioned players. I just dont think Tejada is the answer, but I would take him at the right price.
Posted by: wright is my boy | June 05, 2009 at 03:10 AM
Cora is adequate enough to play ss while Jose is out. The Mets biggest problem, offesnsively, is that they don't know how to play small ball. The starting pitching isn't getting done, except for Santana. And he is getting fed up with his lack of support. They need to either solidify the starting pitching or take a different approach on offense. It's called an attitude adjustment. They should check in with Seattle and see if Ichiro and Bedard can be acquired. You can put an all star team behind the current starting pitching and only Santana would benefit.
Posted by: surdo | June 05, 2009 at 04:53 AM
I love when people say they love something but they really mean they hate it.
Posted by: MEddler | June 05, 2009 at 02:47 AM
----------------------------
I hate it when people say they love it when people say they love something but they really mean they hate it :)
Posted by: DeJay | June 05, 2009 at 05:19 AM
"It may be feasible to bring in an Oswalt for something like niese, murphy, + prospect. PLUS landing a guy like huff, johnson, or DeRosa using ML caliber P trading someone like Gee, Antonini, Broadway, or Kunz.
Please...we just saw Atl fleece the Bucco's...maybe the Mets will have some luck[finally]
Posted by: whatdatmean | June 05, 2009 at 12:09 AM"
Dude seriously? The Braves were far from Fleecing the Pirates. You want luck? You got it last year when you traded crap for Johan. The Yankees & Red Sox had FAAAAAR superior packages, they just decided they werent going to make the deal and he fell into the Mets laps for nothing because they were the only bidders.
Oswalt for Niese & Murphy? are you joking? Niese's stock is dropping faster than Paris Hilton. The Astros nor any other team in baseball arent going to feel sorry for the Mets, they are going to try to extort them to death. Every team knows how DESPERATE they are and you can bet any package for a player is going to have to include Fernando Martinez or Bobby Parnell or both and Omar in an attempt to save his own a$$ and job is going to trade both of them away to try to save the season in which the Mets wont make the playoffs again.
Its weird, the Yankees over the past 3 years have lost players such as Jeter, Rivera, Posada, Rodriguez, Cano, Sheffield, Matsui and Wang to the DL for very long periods of time and always have been able to stay afloat... thats a good minor league system and good players.. the Mets lack both of those and unlike the Yankees I see the Mets struggling alot with losing Delgado and Reyes... they mets are n trouble
Posted by: PIGEON | June 05, 2009 at 06:14 AM
The lack of knowledge about the Mets farm system is funny to me, sure, all they have is F-Mart, Niese, Kunz, and Parnell :rolleyes: . Please, some research would be nice. I'm not convinced Niese or Kunz would even make the Top 10 of the Mets Farm System right now.....not with the way Niese has struggled.
As for the Mets big league team, I still contend the Mets need a Starting Pitcher more then they need a bat. Ollie is a headcase and you have no idea what he's actually going to give this team going forward, and a rotation with a 4/5 of Livan Hernandez and Tim Redding is not taking this team where they want to go....as well as Livan has pitched. They need another starter in the worst way, and if they get anything from Ollie then great.
Reyes and Delgado aren't on season-ending injuries, they'll likely both be ready to go, or close to being ready shortly after the All-Star Break. They just need to weather the storm in the meantime. It's not like there's a whole lot of players on the market right now anyways that the Mets really have a choice in the matter anyways...
Posted by: AdropOFvenom | June 05, 2009 at 06:56 AM
Please...we just saw Atl fleece the Bucco's...maybe the Mets will have some luck[finally]
Posted by: whatdatmean | June 05, 2009 at 12:09 AM
oh come on now you've fleeced plenty of teams.
The Santana trade was an amazing fleecing. The Delgado trade was almost as good. The mets have had some bad ones too (Kazmir, sorry i couldn't resist and Amb . . . Burgeois for Bannister) but more often than not your trades have worked out.
IMO and i know the mets fans here really want that the problem is that they don't have enough depth at least higher up in their farm system anymore to trade for what they need. The true value they have now is too low (A ball) to warrant another team trading what will make a difference for you.
Posted by: philsWSchamps | June 05, 2009 at 07:35 AM
Bring in Jack Wilson for a mid-level prospect.
What about Christian Guzman? He available?
Posted by: jza1218 | June 05, 2009 at 08:43 AM
C'mon man, a mid level prospect?
It'll take at least one grade A prospect to get it done, if not a grade A and a grade B prospect.
The Pirates arent stupid, they see a team in NEED of a shortstop, deep with pitching prospects, trust me theyre not going to say "hey take him for nothing".
There's also more than one team in need of a shortstop like Wilson right now so that sweetens the pot even more.
Posted by: xethicx | June 05, 2009 at 09:36 AM
xethicx:
Yes, one mid-level prospect. Jack Wilson's salary hinders Pittsburgh from getting anything like a top prospect from a team.
Not to mention that Jack Wilson isn't the only option on the table as well as not even being the best option and the Pirates know that.
If the Pirates act stupid and demand that they get a Grade-A prospect, they'll get laughed at in the face and the other team will just go out and trade for Juan Uribe or something
Posted by: jza1218 | June 05, 2009 at 09:54 AM
Pigeon...
spoken like a true yankee fan.
Yes, the Mets got incredibly lucky with Santana.
Sorry, but they survive missing pieces...not their key guys.
The Yanks spend more than enough money to have 5-6 key guys at all times, so when 1 or 2 go down, its not a big deal. Plus, its the AL, so, you just have to mash, not manufacture runs...so talent + defense is less of an issue than power.
The Mets lost their big power threat, their setup man, and their LEADOFF man...leadoff means 100x more in the NL than the AL. They are still not dead in the water...but get real, the Jeter is a great player, but doesnt meant the same thing Reyes means to their respective lineups. Us losing Delgado is like you losing AROD, except we dont have a 5 guys to cover up for him. Its the NL...which is defense oriented.
I bet that if the Mets offered a package involving Niese, Murph, and a kid like Marte...they can pull in either a big bat or SP
Posted by: whatdatmean | June 05, 2009 at 09:58 AM
The Mets really don't have much to trade. I see Tejada as out of the question.
And to keep hearing about the Santana trade... he is the second highest paid player in baseball. It wasn't a "fleece"
The problem is not who the Mets need to fill Reyes' spot with. It should be focused on developing all-around talent. Their catcher, first base, second base, left field, right field spots are all garbage. Not to mention SP spots 2-5.
Posted by: Russell | June 05, 2009 at 10:37 AM
"It'll take at least one grade A prospect to get it done, if not a grade A and a grade B prospect."
For Jack Wilson? Of the Pirates? Are you crazy?
The guy has a .264/.291/.380 line so far this season, and it's not like that's too far out of line, as his .687 career OPS is only 15 points higher than the one he's posted this season.
Meanwhile, he has little speed on the basepaths, and while he's a plus defensive shortstop, he's not elite, but merely above average.
He's paid a lot of money and really isn't better than a league average player.
He's worth a B prospect at most, but more likely so low level, higher upside guys.
You're overrating Wilson, a lot.
Posted by: scribbletone | June 05, 2009 at 10:41 AM
I was about to say, he must have forgotten how the Yankees were under .500 when Alex Rodriguez came back from Injury. But hey, they overcome injuries that other teams cannot.
Posted by: AdropOFvenom | June 05, 2009 at 10:42 AM
russell,
in terms of prospects you gave up and what they've amounted to, YES it was a fleece. But good for you guys for getting it. He's a great pitcher, one of the best in baseball.
I forget does anyone remember the names banted about with regards to Santana for the Yankees and Red Sox?
I'm sure the Yankees were Hughes and Kennedy and Cabrera. I'm sure the Twins would rather have that deal now.
Posted by: philsWSchamps | June 05, 2009 at 11:04 AM
jza1218:
You're an idiot. But then, you're a Mets fan so I guess I can't expect anything more.
Jack Wilson isn't going anywhere, at least not right now. The Bucs have several good-looking SS prospects in the minors but none are ready yet. So no trade, yet.
And what gives you this idea that you're going to get a decent shortstop in exchange for your crumbs? Yeah, I'm sure all major league teams are sitting around thinking to themselves "(DUH), How can we help da Muts and shoot ourselves in da foot?...(DUH)"
Now empty your drool cup, pull
up your pants, and quit being
such a damned HOMER!
Posted by: KKR666 | June 05, 2009 at 11:16 AM
"Jack Wilson isn't going anywhere, at least not right now. The Bucs have several good-looking SS prospects in the minors but none are ready yet. So no trade, yet."
jza1218's logic is awfully sound here.
You're looking at a plus defensive shortstop that offers practically nothing offensive that's paid to be more than that. Why would he carry so much trade value when a team could trade for a very similar player in John McDonald, who would cost practically nothing?
Also, what the hell are you talking about with Pirates shortstop prospects? What shortstop prospects?
Brian Bixler? The 26 year old posting a .705 OPS despite a .361 BABIP in his THIRD try in AAA? Yeah, right.
Jordy Mercer? The 22 year old with a .647 OPS in A ball?
Then again, Brian Friday has been hitting impressively this season, but he's got a high BABIP and he's never shown this kind of power before at the ML level, so it remains to be seen what kind of player he really is.
The Pirates could really use a long term shortstop.
Posted by: scribbletone | June 05, 2009 at 11:31 AM
Scribbletone:
Youre forgetting the fact that Pirates know that the Mets are in diar need of a shortstop.
You said it when you said that he is a "plus defensive shortstop" which is what the Mets need right now. His offensive production is still better than their in house options.
Ok I may have over rated him by saying 2 prospects but I can tell you that the Mets will have to give up a solid pitching prospect to get Wilson, maybe not Niese or Kunz but someone good. That or 2 higher level B grade guys.
The other option is JJ Hardy. I see him as a potential target for the Mets because they could very easily move Hardy to 2B when Reyes returns and then theyd have 3 great young infielders who can all hit, run and field with the best in baseball.
I would give up Niese/Kunz and Murphy for Hardy, wouldnt you?
Posted by: xethicx | June 05, 2009 at 11:39 AM
@ xethic-
Why would the Brewers, who are very much in this playoff race, trade Hardy? Especially when their offense has already been dropped by Weeks' injury.
Posted by: melonis rex | June 05, 2009 at 12:01 PM
Some people are funny. An A and a B prospect for Jack Wilson? Why wouldn't they just stick with Alex Cora, he is pretty much just as good as Wilson. It annoys me that Yankee fans have the best team in the majors, are playing wonderfully, and they are still worried more about the Mets and trashing them then their own team. You guys do know the Mets and the Yankees are completely irrelevant to each other right? You are aware that they play in two separate league's, no? Just enjoy your own team.
I wonder if the Mets could make a move with Seattle, something like, Niese, Murphy, Gee, Church and Kunz for Bedard and Branyan. Those guys could both be valuable, but at the same time, I think Holt, Martinez, Flores, Havens, Mejia, and to an extent Thole and Marte should be pretty much off limits. Don't deplete the farm system. I would rather just miss the playoffs this year, then to gut everything for a few rentals. This idea that the Mets have to win now is funny, they are moving forward with a core of Reyes, Wright, Beltran, Santana, Pelfrey, Maine, Martinez. Oliver Perez is here for better of for worse. I think he will pitch as a number 4, albeit, a high paid number 4 through the life of this deal, always with that potential to be something much better. So over the next couple years, the Mets will possibly have to fill catcher, first base, right field, second base and probably a number 2 or 3 starter. That is assuming none of their prospects step into those roles. So again, don't gut the farm system, I would rather wait until next year then go all in this year.
Posted by: nrmax88 | June 05, 2009 at 12:14 PM
Well this conversation degenerated quickly.
I could honestly care less about Jack Wilson. Overpaid. Over-sucks. Virtually useless once Reyes comes back. Even with decent defense vs. crappy defense, he's been about exactly half as valuable as Miguel Tejada has so far. If the Mets acquire a SS, I could care less if they can hit "leadoff". I'm much more concerned as to whether their bat would play at a position like first base or if, at the very least, they'd be an offensive upgrade over Castillo. That way, they're not completely useless when/if Reyes comes back.
As for the subject of Niese's value, yeah he's sucking wind in Triple-A, but if that just means another GM won't touch him, fine by me. His skills are all still there, even if the results are not. He's getting lots of Ks, not walking too man, and has an outstanding GB%. Outstanding GB% is usually a good thing, except when you have Mike Lamb playing second base behind you and Javier Valentin playing third base.
Posted by: MEddler | June 05, 2009 at 12:15 PM
Scribbletone:
Ah, yes. Nothing like a pencil-necked Cubs fan to chime in and cherry pick stats.
1. Did I say anything about Bixler? Huh? Did I? He's no more than a UT player and everybody knows that.
2. Remember that Mercer is less than a year removed from college, hitting in a bad hitter's park in a slightly pitching friendly league. All in all, not a bad line.
3.I notice you failed to mention Chase D'Arnaud. He of the .297/.380/.430/.811 line. And also less than a year removed from college.
4. And just saving the best for last: Jarek Cunningham. Unfortunately out for the year with a knee injury but doctors say he'll be as good as new next year and he's probably the best prospect of the bunch.
I don't mind being proven wrong (Lord knows it's happened plenty), but it irritates the heck out of me when people cherry-pick stats.
I don't know which one of these guys will be the eventual long-term SS but I am certain ONE of them will be.
Posted by: KKR666 | June 05, 2009 at 12:19 PM
I yelled and screamed all off season that the Mets needed to add a bat to this line up. Delgado, Reyes, Wright, and Beltran all played nearly every single game last season, I knew that wouldn't happen again. I wanted Bobby Abreu or Adam Dunn so we wouldn't have to trade for a big bat now. We shouldn't be in this position. But Omar got worked by Scott Boras and sold a broken down used car by Seattle for a nice trading chip we could have right now (Mike Carp). Omar Minaya = clueless. If those gaping holes were so obvious to me and not to Omar, maybe it's time he lost his job. Now we have to give up 9 top prospects to Billy Beane for the overrated Matt Holliday. I would dangle Murphy, Nick Evans, Jon Niese, Kunz, and mid level prospects and see what you can get for them right now. Maybe a team looking to make a salary dump will give up a decent hitting 1B or OF. I like Aubrey Huff I think he would be a nice addition. We don't need a rental SS, we're fine with Cora for now. This whole situation could have been avoided if we have signed a bat during the offseason.
Posted by: JoseJoseJoseeee | June 05, 2009 at 12:24 PM
jj puts is valuable because he has an option on the contract. i doubt the mets are pickin the option up and payin him 8 mill next season. so assuming JJ and church come back soon... and parnell doesn't fall apart, y not make bobby the 8th inning guy murphy/tatis your firstbase platoon and trade:
rp jj putz, of ryan church and rp sean green (or player of equal value)
to The Tampa Rays for:
IF/OF Ben Zobrist, SP Jeff Neimann and RP Chad Bradford
zobrist can play ss 2b or of. gold glove no but hes not the worst and can hit. bradford can be had for anything rays just dont want to pay his $2-3 million salary. green is a similar type pitcher only younger and cheaper so i think thats an even swap there. and neimann well maybe they wouldnt trade him but i dont see why not. once kazmir is back its either neimann or price getting bumped out and i would guess if price is doing well it aint him thats gonna go. if they cant get zobrist stick with what you got omar. i dont want to see grdzilanek wilson or any other middle infielder over the age of 30 coming into our everyday lineup. cora is bad enough. there all 250 hitters with no pop and average defense. let valdes play or get a guy with some pop like zobrist to fill in, nothing else makes any sense to me. errors at ss and 2b arent whats been killing the mets this season. I'd also to get Dunn if washington is looking to just dump his contract but I dont see why they would have signed him if there not hoping to at least fetch some good prospects for him...and off the top i know i wouldnt give up parnell niese gee martinez or thole for him so what else you really got to get that deal done?
Posted by: Stefano | June 05, 2009 at 12:52 PM
jj puts is valuable because he has an option on the contract. i doubt the mets are pickin the option up and payin him 8 mill next season. so assuming JJ and church come back soon... and parnell doesn't fall apart, y not make bobby the 8th inning guy murphy/tatis your firstbase platoon and trade:
rp jj putz, of ryan church and rp sean green (or player of equal value)
to The Tampa Rays for:
IF/OF Ben Zobrist, SP Jeff Neimann and RP Chad Bradford
zobrist can play ss 2b or of. gold glove no but hes not the worst and can hit. bradford can be had for anything rays just dont want to pay his $2-3 million salary. green is a similar type pitcher only younger and cheaper so i think thats an even swap there. and neimann well maybe they wouldnt trade him but i dont see why not. once kazmir is back its either neimann or price getting bumped out and i would guess if price is doing well it aint him thats gonna go. if they cant get zobrist stick with what you got omar. i dont want to see grdzilanek wilson or any other middle infielder over the age of 30 coming into our everyday lineup. cora is bad enough. there all 250 hitters with no pop and average defense. let valdes play or get a guy with some pop like zobrist to fill in, nothing else makes any sense to me. errors at ss and 2b arent whats been killing the mets this season. I'd also to get Dunn if washington is looking to just dump his contract but I dont see why they would have signed him if there not hoping to at least fetch some good prospects for him...and off the top i know i wouldnt give up parnell niese gee martinez or thole for him so what else you really got to get that deal done?
Posted by: Stefano | June 05, 2009 at 12:52 PM
WFAN is reporting Putz is headed for bone spur surgery a la John Maine. He'll miss 8-10 weeks if this report is accurate.
Posted by: MEddler | June 05, 2009 at 12:56 PM
At least there is an explanation to why he was so terrible.
Posted by: nrmax88 | June 05, 2009 at 12:58 PM
and u know carp isn't a top prospect his absence isn't stopping us form getting a trade done. that deal with seatle was a wash. I actually think reeds been good so we maybe improved a hair or 2. but we didnt lose a damn thing and it was a great move even if JJ is a bust. only a complete omar hater would think otherwise. and oh I forgot about Nick Evans...there you go. I'd in fact give them Evans and Green if thats what it took to get a deal like that with tampa done.
Posted by: Stefano | June 05, 2009 at 12:58 PM
Zobrist isn't going anywhere with Aki Iwamura out. Plus, Evans spent the first few months of the season in Triple-A and hit about .080, and he got demoted to Double-A, where he's now hitting around .200. His stock has plummeted worse than Niese's. At least with Niese there are lots of silver linings like K/BB and GB%. Evans has been just about as bad as a hitter can be.
Posted by: MEddler | June 05, 2009 at 01:03 PM
"At least there is an explanation to why he was so terrible."
Yeah I think it was pretty obvious at this point. His velo was down significantly and he wasn't locating at all. He was just a mess.
BTW, I saw you popped into AmazinAvenue the other day, nrmax. That's pretty much my interwebz hangout at this point, I come here when something like this happens, but AA's a pretty good place to discuss without having to deal with the loads of crap you sometimes get in the comments section here.
Posted by: MEddler | June 05, 2009 at 01:05 PM
Yeah... I remember you telling me about a month ago. I started reading the stories but never registered, then I read the "Day in the life of Brian Stokes" story and had to register.... that was just hysterical.
Posted by: nrmax88 | June 05, 2009 at 01:12 PM
Yeah that one was hilarious. I'm pretty sure the writer did something just like that about Ollie when it looked like he might be going to the pen, but I can't find it now. Ah well.
Posted by: MEddler | June 05, 2009 at 02:14 PM
I would never trade reyes for derek lee Iknow Im'late on that but it's ridiculous. My post name is for that reason He's 26 in the hardest market for media plus we need to keep homegrown players.No one can replace the excitement he brings he has fun. Gets paid nothing and loves the game.When all is said and done we will love these guys.
Posted by: reyes wright #1 | June 08, 2009 at 10:20 AM
I would never trade reyes for derek lee Iknow Im'late on that but it's ridiculous. My post name is for that reason He's 26 in the hardest market for media plus we need to keep homegrown players.No one can replace the excitement he brings he has fun. Gets paid nothing and loves the game.When all is said and done we will love these guys.
Posted by: reyes wright #1 | June 08, 2009 at 10:20 AM
In his 6-8 year career j. rollins did nothing untill his mvp year and that was and is his only great year. reyes has not done as much ,but rollins is 3-4 years older in his prime we must stay patient. Its not like he's done for the money he makes. he gave the mets a bargain as did wright.remember getting rid of just to name a few david cone,melvin mora,scott kazmir just to name a few.Instead of booing and making guys press and play bad .Lets support .
Posted by: reyes wright #1 | June 08, 2009 at 10:28 AM
plus rollin s #'s are balooned by that ban box of a park.
Posted by: reyes wright #1 | June 08, 2009 at 10:31 AM