MLB Rumors - MLB Trade Rumors
Subscribe to MLB Trade Rumors using RSS
Home     Contact     About     Advertise     Archives     Widget     Twitter      RSS Usage

« Orioles Hoping To Deal Before Deadline | Main | Odds and Ends: Pedro, Wells, Tepesch, Zito »

Discussion: When Is "Now" For The Blue Jays?

In this article at SI.com, Joel Sherman argues that the Blue Jays cannot realistically expect to make the playoffs in the AL East anytime soon and thus should start building for the future by trading ace Roy Halladay.

"To have any kind of sustained run," Sherman writes, "the Blue Jays have to turn Halladay into three or four significant pieces that will help the next really strong Toronto team, which is 2011 at the earliest."

On the slowest American (and Canadian?) sports day of the year, I'm looking to start a little discussion. Do you agree with Sherman's assessment of the Jays' playoff chances? In the brutal AL East, what should the Blue Jays' long-term strategy be? Should they stop with trading Halladay, or is completely rebuilding an option?


Comments

Hire a magician to make Vernon Well's contract disappear.

Hope for contraction, then be moved out of the AL East.

When they change divisions.

Red Sox and yanks are teams that have the money and the farms that a rebuilding "year" means they were third in the division. Now the Rays are a competitive team for at least a few more years, maybe perpetually depending on how well the team is run. Add to it, the Orioles have a young core in the minors that makes them interesting in (coincidentally) 2001.

The truth is the Jays in any other division would be a perpetually leader and most of the time for the first half of the year they're neck and neck with the rest of the AL East... but they can't keep up.

*2011, not 2001. The Orioles could start being competitive in 2011.

As a Jays supporter, I think they can win next year. It's not likely, but if they have Halladay, a similarly healthy lineup and a remotely healthy pitching staff (unlike this year) then they could make noise in the playofffs if Snider joins Lind and Hill as the team's best hitters.

Lots of ifs in there, but it's possible and the Jays should have plenty of marketable pitching depth to help plug holes this offseason.

That's just it...too many IFs. Good teams have more answers than questions. The Jays need to rebuild and somehow get out from under the Wells contract. With limited budget every year, that contract is the killer.

The Jays are in the top half of the AL in run differential and are severely under-performing their Pythagorean W/L record and this is with approximately 90 pitchers on the DL and losing their number 2 starter to a division rival. Their entire opening day rotation has been on the DL at some point this season.

They also had the 2nd best Pythagorean record in the AL last season. Obviously, that isn't the be all and end all of it, but this "they can't compete in the division" stuff is complete BS. They've just been completely unlucky.

Being a Jays fan, it's frustrating as hell to watch this team on a day-to-day basis, because I know they're better than they look now and I know people will just brush off the hot start as a fluke, when I think how they were playing then is closer to their true talent level than the past 6 weeks have been.

I know it would never happen, but if I was Riccardi, I'd offer him to teams for next to nothing if they took Wells' contract as well. Clearing that off the books would probably be worth as much as any prospect package they could recieve for him.

2011, IMO. Trading Halladay at the deadline for a massive haul of elite talent really, really helps.

2011, IMO. Trading Halladay at the deadline for a massive haul of elite talent really, really helps.

The Jays have a very good team and have a very good chance to win soon the AL East is the best Division in all of baseball and Bitey I understand frustration lately with the way our bull-pen has been pitching its frustrating to watch a win turn into a loss even when you have a 8,9 run lead when you hand the game to the bullpen, just grit through the BS they will be a contender next year probably.

Seems like they've had a bunch of good young pitchers over the last couple of years, but have really been hurt by injuries.

If Marcum comes back, with Romero and some of these other guys, they should still have a solid rotation.

You'd better pitch well to have any chance in that division. Ask the Orioles.

Halladay won't bring in 'three or four significant pieces...' One team surely doesn't have that many key players just sitting in the minors waiting to be traded. And if they did, why would they trade them, when they can be used for their own club's success in two or three years? Halladay's price has to come down for trades to be realistic. And until the Jays really have incentive to trade him, he won't be traded. He's still affordable for another year. Moreover, he's a type A free agent so when he's signed by another team Toronto can use those extra draft picks to draft to their needs, rather than trying to find a partner who happens to have the pieces the Jays are looking for stored away in the minors waiting for a deal like this to come along.

So 'rebuilding' with just Halladay isn't really an option. It'll have to be all or nothing (see Florida Marlins). Scott Rolen, Lyle Overbay, Alex Rios?, and others would have to be traded for prospects as well. Dumping Vernon Wells' contract would also be huge.

If not, the Jays will probably be stuck fielding mediocre-good teams that always seem to finish behind the Yanks and Sox (And Tampa Bay, until they run out of stud prospects and return to the cellar).

Wells contract has killed the franchise for the next few years. For them to become contenders they need guys like snider, arencibia, cooper to work out in the next year. I would use Halladay to acquire that SS you've been missing for the last decade, along with a 3b. I think the SP you have right have gained great experience and will only benefit the team next year. Therfore acquiring another SP should not be a priority in the trade. I think the OF is set, unfortunately, because you really can't move the expensive ones. For the jays to compete they need to keep building from within, they seem to be doing a good job the last few years, a lot of their roster are home grown players. They also seem to get in trouble every time they spend money, case in point, wells, burnett, rios, overbay, ryan. That should be a lessen, watch what you spend your money on.

God i wish we could stop talking about this. Every rumor on this site is about Roy Halladay. He probably won't even be traded. Why would they trade him now when he can finish the season, win a Cy Young, and have even more trade value?

When is "now" for the blue jays?

Answer: 1993

God i wish we could stop talking about this. Every rumor on this site is about Roy Halladay. He probably won't even be traded. Why would they trade him now when he can finish the season, win a Cy Young, and have even more trade value?

Posted by: ChiSoxKilla23 | July 15, 2009 at 08:55 PM

How on earth would his trade value be better at the end of the year? With a Cy Young? Cmon everybody knows how good Halladay is he doesn't need another Cy Young award to prove that. It would just be another feather in his cap... he is at peak value right now and the price would lower automatically in the offseason because he would only have 1 year on his deal left, not 1 1/2.

I think Halladay is at his peak value right now and the Jays should capatilize on it right now. A team is getting a year and a half with Halladay right now, if the Blue Jays wait until next season the price will go down since it will be for only half the year. Unless the Blue Jays want to not get anything for Halladay they should deal him now. He can easily demand a major league pitcher and top of the line prospects. The Jays can keep all their other offensive talent and still set themselves up for success in a couple years.

God i wish we could stop talking about this. Every rumor on this site is about Roy Halladay. He probably won't even be traded. Why would they trade him now when he can finish the season, win a Cy Young, and have even more trade value?

Posted by: ChiSoxKilla23 | July 15, 2009 at 08:55 PM

By waiting until the offseason, Halladay will LOSE value, not gain it. He'll be in the last season of his contract, and I highly doubt he takes a discount for his new club. Any team that acquires him now gets to make two stretch runs while he's reletively cheap...by waiting until the offseason they get only one. As the article says, there will be plenty of other options available this offseason. There's little else available right now. Winning another award from the media isn't going to change any GM's perception of his value.

good thinkin s17 lol

Prospects get you fired.

They also get you a hefty raise, not many GMs are willing to take that risk though.

Prospects get you fired.

Posted by: nymforlife | July 15, 2009 at 09:07 PM

Jim Duquette? Or is this Steve Phillips?

I think it's a bit of a stretch to say they cannot realistically hope to compete. With Doc next year and the rest of their starters back and healthy, the team is definitely a force. I certainly don't completely classify the first few months of this year for the Jays as a fluke.

Now, I do understand they are in a division with three juggernauts, and a club in Baltimore with an incredible young core. I just think it's unfair to the Jays and their fans for Sherman to say they have little to no chance.

"Halladay won't bring in 'three or four significant pieces...' One team surely doesn't have that many key players just sitting in the minors waiting to be traded. And if they did, why would they trade them, when they can be used for their own club's success in two or three years?"
-------------------------
One would hope any Halladay trade would trump the Erik Bedard trade (who does not belong in Halladay's class).

The Jays remind me a lot of the Braves last year.

Their entire rotation has been on the DL at some point this year with a few guys out for months and the season possibly.


If they had a steady rotation they would be right up there with the rest of the division.

It seems like the Phils are a good fit if it brings back a ss, 1 or 2 starters and 1 or 2 outfielders.

From the Phils perspective I am sure they would like to keep Drabek and/or Taylor, but if they offer one of those along with Brown and maybe the catcher (Marson?) and Knapp maybe they should go for it?

Just seems like the few other teams that can offer up the prospects are limited by money or desire to unlooad that many young guys.

I guess we will find out soon...

Three Options...

1. They can hope for 2 elite prospects and take the lower level prospects and hope the lower level prospects develop better than projected.

2. They can try to take prospects and take on a bad 1 or 2 year contract and maybe get the 3 Grade A prospects they want along with the bad contract.

3. Trade a bad contract and save the team money to sign Free Agents. Maybe Yankees would take halladay and vernon wells for A-Jax, Pena and Igawa... This way you get your A prospect, save money and can sign 2 other good "A" players and you're guaranteed production from the proven players... and you have the A prospect you wanted.

The jays aren't in as in bad a shape as Say, the Nats,; i'd say they're like the orioles. They should trade halladay for as many top prospects as they can get, and look forward to being relevant in 2-3 years. Small market team means success comes with home grown talent that is cheaper, albeit, slower to acquire.

In 100% agreement with Joel Sherman.

#1 - get as many top quality prospects as you can.

#2 - Can't assume all the guys having career years (Scutaro) or comeback years (Rolen) or breakout years (Lind) will do it again.

#3 - Even with a rotation of Marcum, Romero, Cecil the Jays will be competitive.

#4 - McGowan is close to done... that's my fear. The fact that he has not reacted well to post surgery rehab is not good. I had my labrum repaired myself this past September and believe me it sucks. I could not imagine throwing a baseball ...
Best case scenario is he pulls a Carpenter - worst case a Sirotka. ... I am a huge Dustim McGowan fan and the team would be completly different with him in the lineup healthy and throwing his pre-surgery electric stuff.

#5 - Wells contract is a bad one but Jays have to live with it ... much like the Red Sox managed with Mike Lowell's "bad contract". That was supposed to be an albatross that the Marlins wanted off the books and it didn't turn out too bad for Boston. Maybe Wells turns in a decent year in the next 4-5.. its possible.. I mean Zito is a league average arm after being garbage for the past 2 years.

#6 - Sell high on Halladay. His value is at its highest. Even though "Ricky" from Brampton and "Darryl" from Oshawa will revolt and not come to the game... so what... the team has a hardcore following and tickets are cheap.

I think the Jays are built to compete for 2010 if Marcum and Litsch could come back healthy and effective. There staff could be one of the better ones in baseball next year. If Wells and Rios could have bounce back years and maybe if they can pick up a productive first basemen I would not rule them out.

Nobody thought the Rays could do what they did, so why not the Jays?

I blame that supreme Turd Bob Costas. F U. Costas.

The harsh reality is that the best the Jays can hope for over the next two years with the pieces they have isn't enough to win the AL East. They need to start rebuilding for a real run, and I'm kind of surprised that they didn't pull the trigger this past offseason. They basically made no moves, which kind of indicates that they were hoping their (good, not great) team would magically outperform the Red Sox, Rays, and Yankees. If they want a real shot at the postseason, they need to build a team for 2011... which involves trading Halladay while his value is highest (now), and personally I think the best return they could ask for is getting out from under Vernon Well's ridiculous contract. His salary is going to be about 1/4 to 1/3 of their yearly payroll from 2011 to 2014, which will pretty much kill any hope of building a strong enough team during the target period we're talking about. Taking on another bad 1-2 year contract could help facilitate that, and consider it a part of rebuilding.
If Ricciadri isn't willing to take the plunge, the Jays are most likely doomed to 3rd and 4th place finishes for the foreseeable future.

Also, someone take pity on Toronto & the Orioles. Save these poor teams from further thrashings in the AL East.

Well I see the sawks are auditioning Bukholtz for the Jays this weekend.

Phils don't have the money.

So it's Yanks and Sawks: both have plenty of prospects. Let the bargaining begin. I say he's in pinstripes along with either wells or rios.

I hate trading yankee players but obviously Joba or Phil or somebody good is gone. If we take Wells they take Igawa.

The simple fact is that you can't let the best starting pitcher walk when you need another starting pitcher. Beckett/Lester/Halladay -- start polishing that WS trophy. Sabathia/Burnett/Halladay? That takes the Yanks all the way. You think they balk at spending more money. If they don't spend it, Cash is guaranteeing a win with another strategy. Hate to be in his shoes. Spend all that money and NOT make it? Priceful.

Phils don't have the money.

Posted by: jayd808 | July 15, 2009 at 10:12 PM

Where exactly did you come up with that? That contradicts the comments straight from Ruben Amaro.

By 3-4 key pieces, I don't think they mean 3-4 elite top prospects. 3-4 pieces period. Probably 1-2 elite top flight prospects, but a few strong throw-ins. In most trades a "throw-in" is an organizational depth or a "Project" guy, but this one it probably won't be. A guy like an Edwin Jackson a few years ago? Or an Adrian Gonzalez when he was with the Rangers? Or when the Tigs were shopping Carlos Pena? Luke Scott or Sherrill for the Os big trades? Something like that.

"I don't think they mean 3-4 elite top prospects."

Is there any team that has 3-4 elite prospects?

Only if Halladay openly agrees to extend with that team acquiring him can Riccardi seriously field offers. That probably won't happen with his agent advising he wait for the mighty Stankee $$$ after 2010 but it's convenient for Riccardi if he were too.

We've already had "Hustlers Duo" (Tex and his jerk agent Scotty Boris) open Pandoras Box of hustling up baseball over it, while this ridiculous greed created will make for another attempt.

Joel Sherman acknowledged agreeing upon my call into MLB radio in December, 2008 where I said the leading circumstances may pressure Riccardi to unload Halladay for that moment's opportunity to bolster the team's future, BTW.

I would say there are, for sure.

The Phillies have Drabek, Brown and Taylor.

The Rangers have Smoak, Feliz and Perez.

The Marlins have Morrison, Stanton and Maybin.

The Braves have Heyward, Schafer and Hanson.

The Red Sox have Bowden, Anderson and Kelly.

The Giants have Bumgarner, Posey, Villalona and Alderson.

The Rays have Jennings, Davis, Beckham, and Moore.

The Orioles have Tillman, Matusz, and Hobgood.

The Royals have Hosmer, Moustakas and Crow.

You could even argue Beckham/Flowers/Poreda, Montero/Jackson/Brackman, Martin/Lindblom/Lambo, Latos/Tate/Blanks, Chacin/Matzek/Rogers, Alonso/Frazier/Duran, Alvarez/Lincoln/Sanchez, Strasburg/Norris/Burgess, Flores/Martinez/Meija, White/LaPorta/Santana and Ackley/Saunders/Ramirez, to be fair.

There are a lot of well hyped prospects in the game today..

I would swap out Schafer with Freddie Freeman. Schafer seems like the next Josh Anderson to me.

By 3-4 key pieces, I don't think they mean 3-4 elite top prospects. 3-4 pieces period.
-S.W.P.
----
I agree that's what the original quote probably referred to. But I think if they're going to compete in the next two years (as per the topic), the pieces will have to be elite, which Bedard nor Halladay will/could bring in with teams clinging to their young prospects like they do today (and yes HumanToilet is very much correct: Halladay trumps Bedard).

S.W.P. names successful 'project' players, but I bet there are many more failures out there. As a Cards fan I relate: Ryan Ludwick to Rick Ankiel (twice), Chris Duncan, Joe Thurston, Brian Barden and others... Perhaps more accurately I believe this potential trade compares to the Mark Mulder trade a few years back that sent STUD Danny Haren, serviceable Kiko Calero and 'project' Daric Barton to the A's for a (the) top pitcher in the game at the time...

I think Toronto is asking for more than the precedent, which is probably the right price, but not many teams (I think none) will be willing to pony up. Eh, we'll know by the end of the month. But either way, I still don't think it's enough to make the Jays competitive 2 years from now in the AL East. They've got a few other things to do first...

truth is "now" for the Blue Jays was three-four years ago
not necessarily as in trading halladay but as in thinking ahead for the future.
problem is they were hung up on "now"
as in we can compete now.
then they stupidly went all keeping-up-with-the-joneses with a tunnel-vision "look, we can sign players to humongous contracts, too"
meanwhile, by focusing on the Yanks and Sox they were completely blindsided by the Rays — and to a lesser extent, the O's — accumulating young talent.

Only thing worth 3-4 top flight prospects would be an 18 year old pitcher who just went 25-3 with a 1.50 ERA and 300K's...

by the way, their throwing money at "name" players is a Toronto thing. Their hockey team, the Maple Leafs, did the same thing to even worse results.

the jays need to sell on Rolen while he's hot, Scutaro, too, even if they don't have a young shortstop in the wings. Overbay is borderline. they can keep him as a solid vet or see what they can get.
rios is virtually untradable because his contract now far outweighs any drooling his five-tool potential once held.

wells is more of a mystery as to how he fell off his upper-echelon five-tool perch. injuries explains some of it, but he should be past that.
unless they can do a soriano-fukudome for wells-rios with the cubs (another team that thought throwing money at ivory walls was the way to go) they are stuck with them.

I hate to say it, but the only way I see the Blue Jays beating the beasts of the East is to take the all-out burn the farm system and sign the guys we need for a run approach which they obviously can't afford to do, even if the right FA's and trade partners were out there.

The best thing to do would be to find a team who has bad 1 or 2 year contracts, take them on and prospects for Ha;;aday and Wells, so in 2 years when teh bad contracts are up, they can sign free agents. Also they would need to send money along with Wells, but its probably worth it.

The Jays could compete. They are just doing what many teams in baseball are doing - making the future more important than the present. The Blue Jays have prospects to trade. The team has never made a REAL attempt to make the playoffs, maybe because they don't realize how profitable a winning team in Toronto would be. Always about the future... can't mortgage the future for the present. Except if they would win now the crowds would get quite large and there'd be a lot of room for payroll expansion as well.

The Jays pitching will always be good with Ricciardi around, even if we trade Halladay. Dude and his staff are brilliant at building a rotation and a pen, and Arnsberg is a brilliant pitching coach. But, the fact that rumors have it that they are looking mostly for pitching in return for Halladay is a bad sign. They just drafted at least three more good pitchers this past draft (you'll see). What they need with a Halladay are impact bats.

In order to win Wells should be no more than a number 6 or 7 hitter on this team, and not because he's struggling, but because we have good hitters. The three to six guys need to be Lind, Snider and two impact bats gotten via trade. Hill, Rios, Wells need to be supporting offensive players.

The Jays can trade Halladay and get the 3-4 best prospects any team has and they still wont be competitive in the AL East any time soon.
The Red Sox and the Yankees always come to win and Tampa is way better at developing their draft picks into exceptional baseball players.

"Is there any team that has 3-4 elite prospects?"

At the start of the season the Os had Wieters, Matusz, Tillman, and Arrieta at their top 4. We can argue about Arrieta's placement as an "elite" guy, but he's in the Top 100. BA had Matusz and Tillman in their Top 25 to start the season. Right this minute, Wieters has gotten called up and will not qualify, but Matusz and Tillman have become BA's #2 and #3 pitching prospects in baseball. Add in Hobgood and they've got multiple "elite" guys.

"..But I think if they're going to compete in the next two years (as per the topic), the pieces will have to be elite,.."

Why? Since they are elite they would figure it out sooner? It sounds logical but it doesn't play out that way. Johan Santana wasn't an elite guy but he figured it out within a couple seasons to win his first Cy. Carlos Pena was out of baseball after being shopped, but then figured it out in a couple seasons as a Ray. So did Adrian Gonzalez. The Greek God of Baseball Youkilis figured it out in a couple of seasons too. And then there are tons of elite guys who never figure it out even though the team that drafts them often keeps them throughout their cheap years. 1-2 seasons is a long time.

Even with 8 starters having spent time on the DL, the Jays would be right in it if they had any situational hitting over the last month and a half.

Just wanna say 1 thing before I leave for work, the Braves prospects are overrated. See ya.

i dont think there is a realistic way the blue jays can start putting up a fight for at least 4 seasons.

This should be an all out revamp. I would trade everyone in sight. If the player is older than 30 years old, send him off.

Make Adam Lind and Aaron Hill the corner stones of your team.

I would trade Roy Halladay to the Angels for Brandon Wood, Sean Rodriguez and 3 lower level prospects.

Then eat half of Vernon Wells' contract and trade him off for a few quality prospects.

Trade away Accardo for a few young bullpen type arms.

Trade Scott Rolen to the Red Sox for a few prospects, hopefully some of the young middle infield depth they have.

then you roll out a team based around Adam Lind, Aaron Hill, Travis Snyder, Brandon Wood, Sean Rodriguez, Alex Rios and then you have young guys coming up through the system.

Yes, it is risk to pay out bad contracts like this, but there is no reason not to try to save some money and get good prospects in return.

The blue jays have to realize they are behind EVERYONE in the AL EAST...Every team has a brighter future and they seem to be doing little about it.

"I would trade Roy Halladay to the Angels for Brandon Wood, Sean Rodriguez and 3 lower level prospects."

A deal fr Halladay centered around Brandon Wood, Sean Rodriguez and B prospects? What do you consider ROdriguez by the way? An "A" prospect? Brandon Wood the center of a Halladay trade? Is this 2006? Glad you aren't the GM. I'd rather take the two 1st rounders than Brandon Wood and Sean Rodriguez. Not saying they are horrible but there chances of becoming even above average MLB players, let alone stars, is minute at this point.

hey, The Atomic Punk...

Schafer is NOT Anderson.

If you look at Schafer's stats:

http://www.baseball-reference.com/minors/player.cgi?id=schafe001jor

they are MUCH better than even Sizemore's:

http://www.baseball-reference.com/players/s/sizemgr01.shtml?redir

so, at least know what you're talking about before you open your mouth.

Know what makes sense for the jays? Waiting until the offseason to trade Halladay and either Wells or Rios to Boston as sox may need a LF if Bay goes. Maybe Bowden, Reddick, Anderson, Lowrie, and Lugo(if we're taking Wells they gotta take Lugo's remaining 9 mil. cuz no one else will take on Wells besides the MFY!)

Maybe Wood for Wells otherwise your halos have no chance as all your prospects are no longer valuable to anyone cuz you sat on them too damn long!

The most signifant piece to rebuilding the Jays could hope to get (IMO) by moving Halladay would be to send Wells/his salary along in the deal.

As long as the Jays have Wells salary on their books they will be handcuffed every offseason for the next half decade.

Rebuilding by acquiring solid young prospects is one thing; but its tough to do without sprinkling in some veteran free agent acquisitions who can bring the young kids along and provide leadership.

Additionally, Wells salary could result in the Jays being unable to lock up other young players long term (ala, todd helton's salary situation in colorado)

I say that if someone doesn't blow them away with an offer they keep him for the remainder of the year.

Halladay has said numerous times over the years that he won't negotiate contract extensions during the season; it's all about the game and business is left for the off-season.

They can negotiate and trade him with a 3-4 year contract extension. He will be worth more to a team that knows they're going to have him for the next 4-5 years.

Anyone who thinks the contract will be outrageous , think CC, doesn't know 'Doc'. He's not about the money as evidenced by the home town discount he has given the Jays in his last two contracts. Hell, he doesn't even open his pay cheque; he hands it to his wife. He said that it just doesn't feel right making the kind of money he does.

I say keep him

The Jays owe Vernon Wells something like $98m through 2014. There isnt a team in baseball that would take that on. If it was a big contract for another year or so you might get somebody to bite but nobody is going to assume $100m in salary for a guy who is rapidly declining. The only way it would be considered if if Halladay is thrown in and the Jays get a few middle of the road prospects.
That Wells contract is going to be an albatross around Torontos neck for a long time to come.

This is coming from a huge Jays fan. Nothing ever seems to come together for us in the same year and it is frustrating. Two years ago we had great pitching and no hitting. This year the hitting improved slightly and all our pitchers went on the DL. I am getting tired of this team and I do not think we can depend on similar great seasons from our veterans like Rolen, Scutaro and Overbay. Although I do think Lind and Hill are for real. Can we really count on Hill to have a 40HR pace next year as well? I am tired of being disappointed by these players every year and would like to have a chance with some new guys. The only way we can do that is by trading Halladay now, if we keep him there is still too many questions for next season. That said, if there was someway to trade Halladay and as a condition of the trade swap divisions with another team that would be great. I would do that and not even expect a player in return for Roy.

Every time I see someone say that getting rid of Wells is the key to making a deal it mkaes smoke come out of my ears. That makes absolutely ZERO sense.

If the Jays trade Doc they get a haul of players.

If the Jays trade Doc and Wells they get much less in the way of players, but save money.

Money that likely will NOT be used to lure free agents. How is the team (the TEAM, not Rogers) better off.

It makes no sense.

They Jays need middle of the order bats and a future ace.

The only way for them to do so would be for them to develop them internally. Hopefully Travis Snider can make the jump and get them that consistent 30+ HR power that they desperately need. Adam Lind is looking pretty good too but I remember Vernon Wells and Alex Rios having stellar offensive seasons before too and not panning out consistency-wise.

The Jays have been putting out too much mediocrity to contend and they need to quit that tendency. The Lyle Overbays and Scott Rolens of this world are great but only if you have the luxury of having superstars around to make up for it.

They need to trade Roy Halladay, Marco Scutaro, Lyle Overbay, etc. and try to get some high-quality prospects. Send some of their major league-ready pitchers in order to net a better haul if they have to.

I also don't think it's worth it to limit the return on Halladay simply to get rid of Vernon Wells. Try to get the best you can get and worry about Wells this offseason. I'd rather make a fiscal risk on Wells and take the chance that he can post a .800+ OPS to warrant his contract then to get a B-level prospect when I could have gotten an A-level one.

I would trade Roy Halladay to the Angels for Brandon Wood, Sean Rodriguez and 3 lower level prospects."

A deal fr Halladay centered around Brandon Wood, Sean Rodriguez and B prospects? What do you consider ROdriguez by the way? An "A" prospect? Brandon Wood the center of a Halladay trade? Is this 2006? Glad you aren't the GM. I'd rather take the two 1st rounders than Brandon Wood and Sean Rodriguez. Not saying they are horrible but there chances of becoming even above average MLB players, let alone stars, is minute at this point.

Posted by: zaunbie22 | July 16, 2009 at 07:01 AM

Zaunbie22 .... HUH?

Brandon Wood is 24
Sean Rodriguez is 24

Just because you heard about them 2 years ago hardly means they are post-prospects now.

Most players don't develop their power fully until about 27; Wood/Rodriguez have shown a ton of power already and are just now entering prime developmental years.

It is absolutely ridiculous to think 2 draft picks will have a better chance of being an "above average" major leaguer over these two at this point.

For the record: Brandon Wood has more value today than he did in 2006. He still has yet to acheive a full year of status as a major leaguer however he is much closer to major league ready today, then he was 3 years ago. This means a team could get control of him cheaply for 5 years still and potentially put him on a major league field tomorrow.

Do you really mean to say 2 draft picks who won't likely be major league ready until at least 2013 give the Jays a better chance to rebuild then 2 players like Rodriguez/Wood who could start to play a role in rebuilding as early as next year; while maintaining cost control for 5+ years?

Rosario/Hammel/Chacin/Gomez/low level pitcher for Halladay?

Let us rephrase this title always never be for the blue jays.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment


Top Stories



Search MLBTR

Lijit Search

MLBTR Features



Recent Posts


MLBTR Mailing List

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner


Rumors By Team



Monthly Archives


Live Chats


Tuesdays at 2 p.m. CST



Site Map     Contact     About     Advertise     Privacy Policy     Widget     Twitter     Rss Feed


MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com.