![]() |
|
|
| |
« Odds & Ends: Holliday, Red Sox, Pirates, Kazmir | Main | Roy Halladay Rumors: Monday »
8:52pm: Via email, ESPN's Buster Olney says the Tribe will call up Andy Marte to take Garko's place on the roster. Marte is hitting .330-.371-.599 with Triple-A Columbus, and has six homers in his last ten games.
8:46pm: MLB.com's Anthony Castovince says there is no player to named in the deal. It's Garko for Barnes, straight up.
8:31pm: Will Carroll of Baseball Prospectus says the Indians received LHP prospect Scott Barnes and a player to be named later in the deal. Barnes was the Giants 8th round pick in 2008, and has a 2.85 ERA in 18 starts with High-A San Jose. Baseball America rated him the Giants' 9th best prospect coming into the season.
8:22pm: Ed Price of AOL Fanhouse is reporting that Giants have acquired Ryan Garko from the Indians. Garko, 28, was hitting .285-.362-.464 in 273 plate appearances coming into today, playing mostly first but spending some time in the corner outfield spots.
The Giants have been looking to add a bat to their lineup pretty much all season.
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
If they gave up a good prospect then they overpaid.
Posted by: start_wearing_purple | July 27, 2009 at 08:23 PM
could the lee/Martinez rumor to the Dodgers have legs? Loney goes to 1st, but I just hope its not including Billz or Kershaw.
Posted by: lakersdodgersyankees4life | July 27, 2009 at 08:24 PM
Interesting..depending on who they had to give up.
Posted by: GD31892 | July 27, 2009 at 08:25 PM
talk about random. I'd like to see who they gave up too.
Posted by: AczonAczoff | July 27, 2009 at 08:25 PM
lakersdodgersyankees4life
that was shot down yesterday.
Posted by: mleetch352 | July 27, 2009 at 08:26 PM
Knowing Sabean he probably gave up Bumgarner for him.
Posted by: Jays24 | July 27, 2009 at 08:27 PM
I have been petitioning for the longest time for my Mets to make a play for Garko, of course i have no say in the matter but his bat platooning with Daniel Murphy would combine for solid 1B. If the Giants gave up a little to nothing prospect for him ... i will feel devastated and my fire Omar rant will continue/
Posted by: FreeSide | July 27, 2009 at 08:29 PM
Lincecum removed from his start tonight.
...just kidding
Posted by: TheChairman | July 27, 2009 at 08:29 PM
Knowing Sabean he probably gave up Bumgarner for him.
Posted by: Jays24 | July 27, 2009 at 08:27 PM
That's a pretty baseless criticism...he's made some mistakes in free agency, but his evaluation of young talent has been excellent and he hasn't made many head scratching trades.
Posted by: 86 Mets | July 27, 2009 at 08:31 PM
Garko is a solid hitter. I always thought he could really produce if given 550 at bats a year and set at 1 position (1B). He did have a pretty good year in 2007 I think?
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | July 27, 2009 at 08:32 PM
Francisco Liriano, Boof Bonser and Joe Nathan for A.J. Pierzinsky is not head scratching?
Posted by: Pablano | July 27, 2009 at 08:32 PM
"he hasn't made many head scratching trades"
Actually he has made a few good ones. Morris and his salary to the Pirates for Davis.
Posted by: start_wearing_purple | July 27, 2009 at 08:34 PM
thechairman needs a hobby. comedy clearly isn't a strength.
Posted by: machobeans | July 27, 2009 at 08:35 PM
Francisco Liriano, Boof Bonser and Joe Nathan for A.J. Pierzinsky is not head scratching?
Posted by: Pablano | July 27, 2009 at 08:32 PM
It was a bad one, but if you have to go back to 2003 to citicize him he's not doing too bad. Every GM misses here and there, missing badly once in 2003 is hardly reason to justify a comment implying sabean is clueless.
Posted by: 86 Mets | July 27, 2009 at 08:36 PM
Francisco Liriano, Boof Bonser and Joe Nathan for A.J. Pierzinsky is not head scratching?
Nathan had never shown anywhere near what he would or could do. AJ an All Star catcher....hindsight is always 20/20...
Posted by: mib | July 27, 2009 at 08:36 PM
"That's a pretty baseless criticism...he's made some mistakes in free agency, but his evaluation of young talent has been excellent and he hasn't made many head scratching trades."
Shea Hillenbrand (NEEDED to be traded from Jays) and Vinnie Chulk for Jeremy Accardo?
Barnes and Ptbnl. Not bad.
Posted by: Jays24 | July 27, 2009 at 08:37 PM
Over at the San Diego Padres forum, some guy is reporting on a 3 way deal involving Adrian Gonzalez.
Posted by: Pablano | July 27, 2009 at 08:37 PM
Depending on the PTBNL, not a bad deal for the Giants as long as they realize they're not getting a great bat for a first baseman.
Posted by: start_wearing_purple | July 27, 2009 at 08:37 PM
I would like to address all the boneheads on here who like nothing better than to slam Brian Sabean everytime he inhales. I have noticed that no matter what the circumstance, your view is that Sabean is awful. Has anyone noticed that his team (which finished 72-90 last year) is 8 games over .500 and competing for a wildcard berth? My question is what EXACTLY could he do that would make you happy? Sure he has made his share of bad moves (which GM hasn't?). b\But he has made his share of good moves also, and may have set the Giants up for the post season this year. So before you post some idiotic opinion about Sabean being awful, please ask yourself this question: What is the alternative? He cannot trade for V-Mart (or any other high caliber player) without giving up something BIG. It's the way the business works! Wake up!!
Posted by: SFnative | July 27, 2009 at 08:37 PM
Ryan Garko = Ryan Klesko?
Posted by: shhango | July 27, 2009 at 08:39 PM
Over at the San Diego Padres forum, some guy is reporting on a 3 way deal involving Adrian Gonzalez.
Posted by: Pablano | July 27, 2009 at 08:37 PM
LINK LINK LINK LINK!?
Posted by: Kulaid33gobrs | July 27, 2009 at 08:39 PM
lakersdodgersyankees4life
that was shot down yesterday.
Posted by: mleetch352 | July 27, 2009 at 08:26 PM
yea, i know. But it said they were talking about something. I just wonder if this could open up some kind of deal.
Also, i believe, this is their first move of selling. This could be a flood-gate type move
Posted by: lakersdodgersyankees4life | July 27, 2009 at 08:40 PM
"That's a pretty baseless criticism...he's made some mistakes in free agency, but his evaluation of young talent has been excellent and he hasn't made many head scratching trades."
Uh. What?
Posted by: CubbyFan23 | July 27, 2009 at 08:40 PM
Trade was, got info off Indians site
First baseman Ryan Garko has been traded from the Indians to the Giants for Class A left-hander Scott Barnes
The 21-year-old Barnes is 12-3 with a 2.85 ERA in 18 starts for Class A San Jose in the California League. He leads the league in wins, is second in ERA and his 99 strikeouts are tied for ninth overall.
Barnes was an eight-round Draft pick in 2008 out of St. John's University. He is listed at 6-foot-4, 185 pounds. Baseball America named him the ninth-best prospect in the Giants' system before this season.
Posted by: Mike | July 27, 2009 at 08:41 PM
GREAT trade for the Giants.
Give Garko 550-600 atbats and he'll get you 20 HRs and 100 RBIs.
Again, look back to last August....Garko has been the BEST hitter on the Indians.
Posted by: Hermie13 | July 27, 2009 at 08:42 PM
Link http://castrovince.mlblogs.com/
Posted by: Mike | July 27, 2009 at 08:42 PM
Not that link hahaha
Over at the San Diego Padres forum, some guy is reporting on a 3 way deal involving Adrian Gonzalez.
Posted by: Pablano | July 27, 2009 at 08:37 PM
Posted by: Kulaid33gobrs | July 27, 2009 at 08:43 PM
Sounds like a pretty good trade for both teams.
SF nees a bat now and CLE just needs pitching at any level.
I think its time for CLE to tear this thing down and build for the future. Lee and VMart should go for some premium young pitching and perhaps Peralta could be on the way out too.
Posted by: bbxxj | July 27, 2009 at 08:45 PM
Nice deal for the Giants, Garko is an above average bat and might improve even more in the NL.
However, this probably shouldn't end their search for a bat. It really shouldn't, theystill need offensive help.
Sadly, it probably will.
Posted by: B3NG4L | July 27, 2009 at 08:45 PM
http://www.forums.mlb.com/n/pfx/forum.aspx?tsn=4&nav=messages&webtag=ml-padres&tid=36079
Posted by: Pablano | July 27, 2009 at 08:46 PM
For all the criticism's everybody here seems to have for Sabean, the guys has built a solid minor league system. He's also got some pretty good young guys on the ML roster. In the past he's signed some free agents to bead contracts, but he's managed to hang on to most of his young talent. The Giants farm system probably has as much premium talent as any in the league, and he's got a team very much in the playoff hunt.
Posted by: 86 Mets | July 27, 2009 at 08:47 PM
Oh yea. That looks really legitimate. Read the post anyways, he isn't reporting a trade, he is suggesting if a trade is too happen, could it be 3 way?
Posted by: B3NG4L | July 27, 2009 at 08:47 PM
Damn i wanted the mets to get garko. I always liked him since he played well in the ALCS against the sox in 07. He's kinda what he mets need, a 1b with some pop. If he is given a full season he will probably hit 20-25 hr's with 85rbi's, although his average would drop to around .270
Posted by: johan is GOD | July 27, 2009 at 08:47 PM
"Francisco Liriano, Boof "Bonser and Joe Nathan for A.J. Pierzinsky is not head scratching"
That turned out not to be a good deal on Sabeans part, but like another poster stated, Sabeans track record on trades has been much much better than his FA Signings. Lets not forget about Schmidt, Nen, Burks, Lofton, Worrell, J.T Snow, Felix Rodriguez etc....
And lets not forget the best deal of them all. Getting the Pirates to take Matt Morris and his large bank off of the Giants payroll. That evened out his bad FA Signing of Morris!
So while i'll criticize Sabean for alot of things, I don't have much criticsm for the deals he has actually made.
Posted by: JP | July 27, 2009 at 08:49 PM
thats all speculation..thats not reporting..Barack Ombama said thats what the red sox should do.If you look at the main site on here they said they are trying to do something HUGE. I think that the red sox will do something more extreme then that trade.
Posted by: Kulaid33gobrs | July 27, 2009 at 08:49 PM
Have to like this trade for both teams.
Garko really didn't have a long-term role or clear position on the Indians. He's at best a .280 hitter with 20-25 HR power -- not quite good enough to be an everyday 1B or DH on a good team, but he can't truly play any other spots. However, he's definitely an average or above average stopgap bat for a lineup looking to add pop, and I think he meets the Giants needs for now.
And yes, the Indians really need to get rid of spare parts and impending free agents to add pitching depth to the system.
Posted by: Browns0286 | July 27, 2009 at 08:51 PM
I know the Indians didn't see Garko fitting into an everyday role (for what reason, who knows?), but this is a big win for the Giants, and a big gamble for the Indians...
The Giants get a .275+ average and 25HR and the Indians get a guy who is at least 3 years from any major league time, if ever...
Posted by: richard.cordrey | July 27, 2009 at 08:53 PM
That dude on the Padres forum is STUPID... NO WAY DOES Ethan Martin and Clayton Kershaw get you CLAY BUCHHOLTZ and HEATH BELL...BS.TOTALLY FAKE POST.
Heath Bell well get 2 prospects by himself..Buchholtz would be traded to San Diego not LA. haha wow.
Posted by: Kulaid33gobrs | July 27, 2009 at 08:54 PM
How is it a gamble for a losing team in mild-rebuilding mode to get rid of aging parts that don't fit in exchange for younger prospects that meet potential needs? That's basically what the cycle of a mid-market team is. ;P
Posted by: Browns0286 | July 27, 2009 at 08:55 PM
A 28 year old in his 3rd full season is aging?
And yes, its a gamble to trade a guy who could easily be kept around as a DH/Utility for a guy in A ball who may never even get to the bigs...
Posted by: richard.cordrey | July 27, 2009 at 09:00 PM
Some CLE prospect guy help me out here, what does the future Tribe lineup look like?
1. Sizemore CF
2. Cabrera SS
3. LaPorta LF/DH
4. Santana C
5. Weglarz LF/DH
6. Choo RF
7. Chisenhall 3B
8. Mills 1B
9. Second base?
That looks pretty dang solid if I am forcasting that anywhere close. Now all they need is some young frontline starters.... hence the need for the VMart and Lee trades.
Posted by: bbxxj | July 27, 2009 at 09:02 PM
Not a bad deal for The Giants, but more is needed.
Posted by: JP | July 27, 2009 at 09:07 PM
Really? we gave up our 9th best prospect for Garko? we couldn't have gotten him for Sosa or Pucetas or even Tanner? As a Giants fan I'm not happy with this trade
Posted by: gobroks | July 27, 2009 at 09:07 PM
Some CLE prospect guy help me out here, what does the future Tribe lineup look like?
1. Sizemore CF
2. Cabrera SS
3. LaPorta LF/DH
4. Santana C
5. Weglarz LF/DH
6. Choo RF
7. Chisenhall 3B
8. Mills 1B
9. Second base?
That looks pretty dang solid if I am forcasting that anywhere close. Now all they need is some young frontline starters.... hence the need for the VMart and Lee trades.
Posted by: bbxxj | July 27, 2009 at 09:02 PM
choo has to go to japan or china or wherever he is from to serve his country. they were talking about it during the WBC
Posted by: johan is GOD | July 27, 2009 at 09:09 PM
^ for two years i believe, but i'm not sure
Posted by: johan is GOD | July 27, 2009 at 09:10 PM
Way to be Omar Minaya you failed to acquire two Indians who were traded for relievers that the Mets do have with similar pedigree.
(Parnel)l for DeRosa equal to Perez
Kunz + PTBNL for Garko equal to Barnes
Would have addressed a big need in the OF and INF... and in my opinion isn't two much in terms of prospects at all. As long as they held onto Mejia and Holt which they would have its an improvement. Oh well hopefully we see a Minaya Fired thread soon. I'm sure Nrmaxx will be the only apologist begging for his services as a "scout"
Posted by: FreeSide | July 27, 2009 at 09:22 PM
"Some CLE prospect guy help me out here, what does the future Tribe lineup look like?"
From my knowledge, as long as Choo is on a ML roster he's exempt from military service as a professional athlete. Not positive though. If he's around, it'll probably look like this:
C: Carlos Santana
1B: Matt LaPorta
2B: Carlos Rivero/Luis Valburna
3B: Lonnie Chisenhall
SS: Asdrubal Cabrera
LF: Nick Weglarz
CF: Grady Sizemore
RF: Shin-Soo Choo
DH: Beau Mills
You could still see Jhonny Peralta, Kelly Shoppach, Wes Hodges, and maybe Abner Abreu in the future.
They really need pitching though, although adding Alex White, Chris Perez, Jess Todd, and Scott Barnes definitely help.
Posted by: scribbletone | July 27, 2009 at 09:23 PM
1. Brantley LF
2. Cabrera SS
3. Sizemore CF
4. Laporta LF/DH/1B
5. Choo RF
6. Santana C
7. Hodges 3B
8. Mills 1B
9. Valbuena 2B
Posted by: thenextgm08 | July 27, 2009 at 09:23 PM
"choo has to go to japan or china or wherever he is from to serve his country. they were talking about it during the WBC"
Unless he becomes a US citizen or the Indians organization work out an agreement with the Korean government, which is not that uncommon
Posted by: TheChairman | July 27, 2009 at 09:23 PM
Choo is from South Korea. And yes Korea has a mandatory military commitment of two years but he is going to try to get a deferment. If he can't he will apply for US citizenship. And for anyone who would doubt that, would you turn down millions of dollars to wash a tank for two years? I don't think so.
Posted by: stbailey | July 27, 2009 at 09:25 PM
TheChairman beat me to the punch. Touche.
Posted by: stbailey | July 27, 2009 at 09:26 PM
anyone know how long garko is under contract for?
Posted by: FutureGiantsGM | July 27, 2009 at 09:30 PM
I'm happy about this trade. Garko is fairly young, not expensive and we didn't give up much for him. He will provide some pop and is an improvement over Ishikawa. Now Sabean, make a deal for Freddy Sanchez, and let's take this thing into the post season.
Posted by: bigmike23 | July 27, 2009 at 09:36 PM
According to RotoWorld.com, Garko is Arb Eligible 1010-2012 and eligible for FA in 2013
Posted by: JP | July 27, 2009 at 09:38 PM
Richard.Cordrey, I meant "aging" in the sense that he's not an up-and-coming prospect anymore. 28 years old makes him at the point of his career where he's about as good as he's going to get.
Why does everyone have Beau Mills so low in the future lineup? Isn't be more likely to develop into a middle-of-the-order guy?
Posted by: Browns0286 | July 27, 2009 at 09:38 PM
any specific reason freddy sanchez isnt in the starting lineup tonight? i hope he's in our duggout by the end of this game
Posted by: FutureGiantsGM | July 27, 2009 at 09:39 PM
"anyone know how long garko is under contract for?"
The Indians website says he is entering his first arbitration year. Usually that means he has between 3 and 4 years left under team control. BTW...the Indians fans are pissed that he was traded. They seem to think he's pretty good.
Posted by: SFnative | July 27, 2009 at 09:40 PM
Sorry for the typo....should read: Arb Eligible 2010-2012
Posted by: JP | July 27, 2009 at 09:40 PM
“Really? we gave up our 9th best prospect for Garko? we couldn't have gotten him for Sosa or Pucetas or even Tanner? As a Giants fan I'm not happy with this trade”
No kidding. Looking at the stats, this Branes guy looks like a stud.
98 IP/18 GS, .64 HR/9, 2.66 BB/9, 9.09 K/9, 3.41 K/BB, 1.33 FIP, .297 BAbip
in the California League??? While being 2 years younger then the average competition?
This is a place where the hitters are posting a .269/.340/.414/.754 line while the average pitcher spots a 4.42 ERA and 1.409 WHIP.
Granted, San Jose is a pitcher park, but only 7 of his 18 starts have been at home and he has been just as strong on the road. This one might come back to haunt the Giants, in a big way.
Posted by: SuzysMan | July 27, 2009 at 09:40 PM
"And for anyone who would doubt that, would you turn down millions of dollars to wash a tank for two years? I don't think so."
Would you renounce your American citizenship and avoid a military draft to make millions in Korea?
Posted by: RoyalsRetro | July 27, 2009 at 09:41 PM
Ishikawa isn't in the lineup either... The ishikawa-for-sanchez deal seems very possible.
Posted by: BaySick | July 27, 2009 at 09:42 PM
“Really? we gave up our 9th best prospect for Garko? we couldn't have gotten him for Sosa or Pucetas or even Tanner? As a Giants fan I'm not happy with this trade”
Have you noticed the Giants have a surplus of pitching???? that is their strength. they had to give some of it away to get what they needed. Nobody wants a middle infielder who is ranked 300th. You gotta give something to get something!!
Posted by: SFnative | July 27, 2009 at 09:43 PM
JP- thanks.. makes me feel better about this trade.. hopefully the minor league numbers are for some reason or other decieving... I guess i like this deal for the giants although its obvious garko wont take them to the next level on his own
Posted by: FutureGiantsGM | July 27, 2009 at 09:43 PM
Would you renounce your American citizenship and avoid a military draft to make millions in Korea?
Posted by: RoyalsRetro | July 27, 2009 at 09:41 PM
I probably would.
Posted by: 86 Mets | July 27, 2009 at 09:44 PM
And whoever said we could have gotten Garko for Pucetas, I'd much rather get him for an A guy than Pucetas who's tearing it up in AAA and a few starts away from the bigs...
Posted by: BaySick | July 27, 2009 at 09:44 PM
"isn't in the lineup either... The ishikawa-for-sanchez deal seems very possible."
I really hope so
Posted by: FutureGiantsGM | July 27, 2009 at 09:47 PM
i think ishikawa isnt in the lineup because of the lefty throwin for the pirates though
Posted by: FutureGiantsGM | July 27, 2009 at 09:48 PM
This is a good move for both sides.
Garko is a great bat, he sees a lot of pitches, he'll hit .280/25/90. He works hard, never complains (even when being stuck in the outfield), and he's a great clubhouse guy. Don't expect all-star numbers, and you'll love him.
And this pitcher the Tribe got sounds pretty good too, although I doubt he'll be a contributor until 2011, at the earliest.
Win-win trade.
Posted by: dan | July 27, 2009 at 09:49 PM
"choo has to go to japan or china or wherever he is from to serve his country. they were talking about it during the WBC"
The Tribe's beat writer Castovince basically said there was NO chance Choo would leave no matter what the consequences.
Posted by: the lowercase zach is better | July 27, 2009 at 09:50 PM
If Barnes was 12-3 at Fresno pitching in a hitters league like the PCL, I would be questioning the deal. But with the Giants minor league strength being its pitching and Barnes only at A Ball level, I think the Giants can afford this particular risk.
Posted by: JP | July 27, 2009 at 09:52 PM
Indians got hosed. People underrate Garko cause he doesn't hit 25-30 HRs.
Dude SET AN ML RECORD for RBIs as a rookie in 2006. He'll be a HUGE lift for the Giants.
Posted by: Hermie13 | July 27, 2009 at 09:53 PM
oh my god are people actually PRAISING Brian frickin Sabean???
Everyone in SF knows he's let his assistants do his work the last 3 years, hence the good farm system. Sabean himself can be found drinking alone in Marina bars during games. He's a drunk and an idiot, he had an excellent system that he systematically wiped out just to suit Barry Bonds. Not to mention telling Jeff Kent to his face that Bonds was more important to the team than him.
Bottom line, the Giants should have never been a bad team the last 4 years, but thanks to the AJ trade, the DAMIAN MOSS for Russ Ortiz trade, Zito+Rowand signings, they were. Any half decent GM would have kept his high ceiling players and won, Sabes didnt.
Posted by: PL | July 27, 2009 at 09:53 PM
Hey we just traded an A ball pitcher for an everyday Major League first baseman with pop. I have nothing to complain about. Plus we have way more pitchers down in the minors getting ready to come up soon. So be happy Giants Fans.....
Posted by: bigmike23 | July 27, 2009 at 09:54 PM
"i think ishikawa isnt in the lineup because of the lefty throwin for the pirates though"
true, just wishful thinking I guess lol
Posted by: BaySick | July 27, 2009 at 09:58 PM
Bonds was more important than Kent. He put butts in the seats before Kent got there and after Kent left....LOL
Posted by: JP | July 27, 2009 at 09:59 PM
"Everyone in SF knows he's let his assistants do his work the last 3 years, hence the good farm system. Sabean himself can be found drinking alone in Marina bars during games. He's a drunk and an idiot, he had an excellent system that he systematically wiped out just to suit Barry Bonds. Not to mention telling Jeff Kent to his face that Bonds was more important to the team than him."
This is just idiotic. Did you notice that after the Giants traded Russ Ortiz away his career went into the TANK!! Arizona ate over 40 million to get rid of him. The Giants atleast got rid of him with a POSSIBLE improvement. As for Zito. There were 29 other GM's that would have made the same move 3 years ago....remember?
Stop being a Monday morning quarterback!!!
Posted by: SFnative | July 27, 2009 at 10:00 PM
Listen Giants fan ... people like Garko are players General Managers crave. He is 28 years old yes, bust has a deep pedigree and is very cheap in terms on salary and how affordable he is. If you can get a Ryan Garko to help out your major league team while forfeiting a Scott Barnes for him ... you do it without question. Garko in 500 abs can give you 20 hrs and 90 cheap RBI's with a solid OPS and OBP. He is a great pickup for you guys and given you have depth it was a risk you needed to take. Now if you guys can get a Mark Teahan or possibly Freddy Sanchez you have a solid shot at the WC.
Posted by: FreeSide | July 27, 2009 at 10:01 PM
Listen Giants fan ... people like Garko are players General Managers crave. He is 28 years old yes, bust has a deep pedigree and is very cheap in terms on salary and how affordable he is. If you can get a Ryan Garko to help out your major league team while forfeiting a Scott Barnes for him ... you do it without question. Garko in 500 abs can give you 20 hrs and 90 cheap RBI's with a solid OPS and OBP. He is a great pickup for you guys and given you have depth it was a risk you needed to take. Now if you guys can get a Mark Teahan or possibly Freddy Sanchez you have a solid shot at the WC.
Posted by: FreeSide | July 27, 2009 at 10:01 PM
SFNative- I agree the Giants should use their pitching depth to get a bat... But they don't need to trade their 3rd best pitching prospect for Garko.
Posted by: gobroks | July 27, 2009 at 10:01 PM
"Would you renounce your American citizenship and avoid a military draft to make millions in Korea?"
To play baseball? Hell yeah..
Bottom line, the Giants should have never been a bad team the last 4 years, but thanks to the AJ trade, the DAMIAN MOSS for Russ Ortiz trade, Zito+Rowand signings, they were. Any half decent GM would have kept his high ceiling players and won, Sabes didnt."
What does trading Damian Moss have to do with winning?
The biggest problem was insisting upon spending money on mediocre veteran free agents on an aging team with a mediocre farm system, because the team just couldn't rebuild with Barry Bonds, putting the team into limbo for a year or two.
Sabean has built up a monster farm system though, with Lincecum, Cain, Sandoval, Wilson, Romo, Schierholtz and Sanchez on the roster, and Posey, Bumgarner, Alderson, Villalona, Noonan, Gillespie, Wheeler, Crawford, Rodriguez, Sosa, and Pucetas
Posted by: scribbletone | July 27, 2009 at 10:08 PM
A long time suffering Giants fan, I am glad they made this trade. However, giving up Scott Barnes, whom I saw pitch in San Jose three times this year, with the outrageous stuff, I don't know who got the better of the deal. I go to SJ Giants game to see Buster Posey but Barnes is a revelation. Tribe fans, give Barnes a chance-- this is a kid who might be in your rotation sooner than you think.
Posted by: halloweencolors | July 27, 2009 at 10:11 PM
Checking MLB.com and mlbtraderumors.com for anymore information regarding a possible Josh Willingham swap for more prospects. Or are FLew and or TIsh about to be traded? Funny, I am not seeing Ishi or Lewis in the dugout. Same goes for F. Sanchez at the Buccos dugout either.
Posted by: halloweencolors | July 27, 2009 at 10:15 PM
Purple Rox and Dogdoers lost today. Chance for the G-men to gain some ground on the WC and Div.
Posted by: halloweencolors | July 27, 2009 at 10:19 PM
If Sabes was able to pull off a Sanchez trade, fans would go nuts.
Posted by: bigmike23 | July 27, 2009 at 10:24 PM
F. Sanchez would be nice and fill the 2B hole nicely, but if The Giants are unwilling to part with Bumbarner, Posey, Alderson or J.Sanchez what are the chances....just saying
Posted by: JP | July 27, 2009 at 10:28 PM
Sanchez for Sanchez straight up. Call up Pucetas. Problem solved.
Posted by: SFnative | July 27, 2009 at 10:31 PM
Wonder if Garko will ask for his #25 lol
Posted by: 55saveslives | July 27, 2009 at 10:37 PM
"Indians got hosed. People underrate Garko cause he doesn't hit 25-30 HRs.
Dude SET AN ML RECORD for RBIs as a rookie in 2006. He'll be a HUGE lift for the Giants.
Posted by: Hermie13 | July 27, 2009 at 09:53 PM "
Garko had 45 RBI in 2006. What was the record that he broke?
It hardly seems relevant, anyway. 2007 and 2008 were both full seasons for him (~140 games each), and he went .289/21/61 and .273/14/90. Not bad, but I feel like some people here are overrating his potential.
Posted by: Browns0286 | July 27, 2009 at 10:37 PM
I don't think Pitt would go for a Sanchez for Sanchez straight up deal. Then again, any team that would trade for Matt Morris and his gazillion dollar contract can't be underestimated......LOL
Posted by: JP | July 27, 2009 at 10:41 PM
Garko or not, the Giants need another bat in their middle of the order. I say two bats (not necessarily power bats) are needed to complement Pablo, just to drive in runs. If Willingham is traded to SF, what would happen to Winn? Schierholtz will be a mainstay. I see Velez is playing left field..lots of speed but punchless at the plate.
Posted by: halloweencolors | July 27, 2009 at 10:44 PM
We have more Fresnoids up in the bigs. Why Velez? Gmen sent down Downs and Bowker. Is Guzman being showcased perhaps as part of a larger deal? Stay tuned.
Posted by: halloweencolors | July 27, 2009 at 10:46 PM
I don't think the Giants are done. More to come I hope.
Totally unrelated, I think F. Sanchez is traded by Friday....hopefully to SF. But if not SF, he will be traded!!
Posted by: SFnative | July 27, 2009 at 10:46 PM
Browns0286,
Garko set a ML record for most RBIs for any player playing 50 or fewer games in a season. It's actually a kept stat, look it up.
And he played in 140 games those years....but didn't have anywhere close to the at-bats you'd expect. He averaged only 3.2 at-bats a game lately....most 'starters' average 3.8-4 at least.
Hits well with RISP (which is why he gets so many RBIs despite not having 30 HR power). Is hititng .295 this year and a career .292 hitter.
Was one of the 5 best hitters in the AL in the second half last year.....he's already on a major hot streak right now....don't be suprised if it continues....
Garko is no 'stud' hitter...but should be a solid #5-6 hitter for the Giants and will really impress.
Posted by: Hermie13 | July 27, 2009 at 10:47 PM
Garko is the big bat acquired? I dunno; seems a little like putting a band-aid on a gunshot wound. Maybe I'm underrating Garko, but... At least the Giants didn't give up much. Barnes has some talent, but he's no stud. He's a college guy having success at High A; nothing to knock, but I'll hold off on calling him the next big thing until I see some success a little further up the ladder.
Also, Kulaid33- Why are you so outraged by the idea of the Dodgers getting Buchholtz and Bell for Kershaw and Martin? Are you saying the Dodgers would be getting too MUCH for those guys? Kershaw is one of the best young pitchers in the game and Martin is a very intriguing young prospect. I think the Padres would listen to a Bell deal that involved Martin (a 2008 first rounder) if the Dodgers included a second, lesser prospect. As far as Buchholtz/Kershaw...you DO know that Kershaw > Buchholtz, don't you? Kershaw is left-handed, younger (a whole 21 years old), and has a 2.96 ERA and 110 K's in 112 innings this year.
You're right about one thing- there's no way in hell this deal happens; but that's because the Dodgers would NEVER consider it. The difference between Bucholtz and Kershaw more than makes up any difference between Martin and Bell. LA would be nuts to trade Kershaw!
Forgive me if I got the intonation of your post wrong, but it looks like you're saying Buchholtz and Bell are too MUCH for Kershaw and Martin and not the other way around. Which, of course, is completely ridiculous. Kershaw is a left handed version of what the Red Sox are HOPING Buchholtz becomes. I'm not a Dodgers fan or anything, but sometimes Sox fans say some stupid sh*# and need to be put in their place. Sorry if I got you wrong.
Posted by: milehigh78 | July 27, 2009 at 10:49 PM
I think if the Giants are going to give up some pitching for a second baseball they need to be looking at uggla.
Posted by: money | July 27, 2009 at 10:52 PM
Would be nice if the giants got Freddy sanchez. But i believe he's not in the pirates line up because Sanchez is hitless in his last 20 AB. He has struck 7 times in his last 12 AB.
Posted by: jersee | July 27, 2009 at 11:02 PM
1. rowand
2. winn
3. sandoval
4. garko
5. UGGLA
6. renteria
7. molina
8. scheirholtz
9. CY Young
This would be the line up
Posted by: money | July 27, 2009 at 11:27 PM
Sabean just said "the intention is to get Ryan as many at bats as we can and still keep ishikawa in the mix"...
Posted by: BaySick | July 27, 2009 at 11:35 PM
Ryan Garko is a step in the right direction he has some pop and gets on base hes a good complementary player and the Giants didn't give up a ton for him just Scott Barnes so today was a win for the Giants
Money who are you giving up for Uggla?
I like Burris Sosa and mid or lower tier prospect for Uggla. I dont know if he is a viable option though Uggla has terrible defense and Sabean is a fan of defense in the infield. I still think Sanchez is the front runner if the Giants make a trade for a middle infielder good defene and he can set the table for the 3, 4, and 5 hitters, and he won't demand as many prospects as Uggla will. Im still crossing my fingers for Dunn. If the Giants can get Dunn from the Nationals the Giants can push the Dodgers for the N.L. West lead and locks up the Wildcard.
Posted by: The_Thrill_22 | July 28, 2009 at 12:04 AM
Thrill, you're fingers may break cause Dunn is'nt coming to AT&T anytime soon. If the Giants did'nt sign Dunn as a FA they certainly won't give up the prospects the Nats will ask for. Its the same reason they did'nt pull the trigger on Nick Johnson. The Nats were asking for too much.
Posted by: JP | July 28, 2009 at 12:28 AM