![]() |
|
|
| |
« Astros Looking For Pitching | Main | Heyman Talks Giants »
1:48pm: A Rosenthal/Morosi source says the Rangers aren't in on Bell, Sherrill, or Matt Capps.
11:49am: ESPN's Buster Olney says the Marlins declined the request for Miller or West, leaving talks between the two clubs at a standstill.
Meanwhile, Joe Capozzi of the Palm Beach Post says the Marlins are also in on George Sherrill.
11:12am: SI's Jon Heyman tells us the Marlins are "are in serious discussions to try to land Padres closer Heath Bell." Heyman says it looks like it could be Andrew Miller or Sean West, names that have been put forth in previous reports. Either young lefty seems like a solid return for Bell. Heyman notes that the Yanks also have interest, but the Fish "are in good position to make a deal." Ken Rosenthal and Jon Paul Morosi at FOX Sports acknowledge interest from the Yanks, but say the teams have not had serious discussions. The writers also mention the Rangers "on the periphery."
Rosenthal and Morosi wrote yesterday that 10 to 15 teams are pursuing Bell. He's under team control through 2011 and sports a 2.01 ERA this season.
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
Andrew Miller for Heath Bell would be a solid move for the Marlins IMO.
Posted by: Browns0286 | July 30, 2009 at 11:14 AM
would be a great deal for the padres for either; buy low on miller and hope he finds the strike zone.
Posted by: bohman | July 30, 2009 at 11:15 AM
who closes for the Padres after this? anyone know? doesn't appear to be a deep bullpen..
Posted by: at4inthemornin | July 30, 2009 at 11:15 AM
who closes for the Padres after this? anyone know? doesn't appear to be a deep bullpen..
Posted by: at4inthemornin | July 30, 2009 at 11:15 AM
Does it matter?
Posted by: Steve | July 30, 2009 at 11:16 AM
adams is my guess
Posted by: bohman | July 30, 2009 at 11:17 AM
I'm assuming Bell would close in Florida right?
Mujica is being tried as a started in SD... so not sure who would be next in line out there if Bell is dealt.
Posted by: Peter Gammons | July 30, 2009 at 11:17 AM
That'd be a nice deal for both teams IMO.
Posted by: Muggi | July 30, 2009 at 11:17 AM
Please be Miller and not West. And if it is Miller, just an advanced warning to Padres fans, when he pitches do not have any throwable objects within grabbing disantance.
Posted by: FiSHFaN1088 | July 30, 2009 at 11:21 AM
I think it will take a little more than Andrew Miller or Sean West to get the deal done though maybe another mid level prospect.
Posted by: Steve | July 30, 2009 at 11:21 AM
Luke Gregerson seems to having a nice season in the Padres bullpen too, so he might get a shot at closing.
Posted by: Jaybird | July 30, 2009 at 11:22 AM
Andrew Miller is a mess, but if there's any place for a pitcher to get straightened out, it's San Diego. I remember hearing that he's sacrificed velocity to try and add movement, not sure if I like that because pretty much all of his potential was his velocity. It would probably be a good deal for both teams, but I'm not sure if Miller is enough.
Posted by: bigpat | July 30, 2009 at 11:26 AM
If this deal gets done... Andrew Miller has sure been traded for some valuable ML players
Posted by: TheoEpstein | July 30, 2009 at 11:28 AM
If i'm the Marlins i'm trying to steer away from West and sell Miller to them as much as I can. Even if it would cost that mid level prospect. From what i've seen West looks to have a brighter future.
Posted by: cooperbmp | July 30, 2009 at 11:30 AM
remember who is reporting this again, until someone with a brain reports this its not happening.
Posted by: derman1984 | July 30, 2009 at 11:32 AM
BTW DID ANYONE JUST SEE THE BREAKING NEWS ON SPORTSCENTER??!?!?
BTW DID ANYONE JUST SEE THE BREAKING NEWS ON SPORTSCENTER??!?!?
Manny and David Ortiz both tested positive for steroids in 2003. I always just thought Ortiz was fat. Apparently he was on roids the entire time.
Manny and David Ortiz both tested positive for steroids in 2003. I always just thought Ortiz was fat. Apparently he was on roids the entire time.
Posted by: Kulaid33gobrs | July 30, 2009 at 11:41 AM
Nice utilization of the copy and paste feature, Kulaid. Seriously, do we need more of this crap shoved down our throats??? And you get pumped for this? Sucks this kind of crap has to happen after a day like yesterday that reminds people how exciting baseball is, especially this time of the year.
Then this kind of crap-breaking news hits.
Posted by: bucs_lose_again | July 30, 2009 at 11:50 AM
Andrew Miller is a bum why would you not give that clown up for Heath Bell
Posted by: Shrooms | July 30, 2009 at 11:53 AM
It better be Morrison or Dominguez for an All Star Cost Controlled Closer for 3 years.
Posted by: theJonathan | July 30, 2009 at 11:55 AM
Because Miller is extraordinarily talented and the Marlins lack a #5 starter right now as it is.
Posted by: m26555 | July 30, 2009 at 11:55 AM
Morrison? Are you out of your friggin mind?
Posted by: m26555 | July 30, 2009 at 11:57 AM
Obviously the Fish reject that deal. Miller or West for Bell would be a steal for the Padres.
Posted by: melonis rex | July 30, 2009 at 11:58 AM
who cares marlins get like 78 pple a game..less than that soon when Hanley rolls out when yall cant pay him.
Posted by: wildcats08 | July 30, 2009 at 12:01 PM
yea Florida's cycle to when a World Series is about up its about time to cut costs. Peace out Uggla, Hanley, Hermida
Posted by: Shrooms | July 30, 2009 at 12:03 PM
wildcats -
So, who is your team? Guaranteed the Marlins have more World Series titles in recent memory than yours.
And we can't pay Hanley? Yeah; I guess that's why we signed him to a six-year deal. Get your facts straight.
Posted by: m26555 | July 30, 2009 at 12:05 PM
some people on these things are so ignorant, wildcat prob a nats fan.
Posted by: Shrooms | July 30, 2009 at 12:08 PM
for those wondering about the Padres closer after Heath it would be Evan Scribner down in AA
Posted by: Myk13 | July 30, 2009 at 12:08 PM
Who in the world cares about the lowly Padres
Posted by: Shrooms | July 30, 2009 at 12:12 PM
hahaha. hanley wont b there for 6 years... he wants to play for some fans and some hot bitches. not 65+ year olds everyday. place is a retirement home during day games. Im a Phils fan.
Posted by: wildcats08 | July 30, 2009 at 12:13 PM
It seems like the Marlins are far too intelligent an organization to do something as stupid as moving Miller or West for Bell. Why do you guys even feed wildcats08? The more you feed him the more he keeps coming back. Click his handle and read his recent posts. They have no substance to them, they all consist of something like....
"a Nats rumor? Who cares about the Nats?" Troll stuff.
Posted by: nrmax88 | July 30, 2009 at 12:23 PM
"As a huge sox fan im praying they will sign either aaron harang or bronson arroyo. bring back bronsons he can eat up the innings and cmon who dont love that high kick???
Posted by: wildcats08 | July 30, 2009 at 12:08 PM "
Thought you were a phils fan? Or do you just root for every team that has won a ring recently.
Posted by: nrmax88 | July 30, 2009 at 12:26 PM
Loving how the Fish are in on Bell and Sherrill (and apparently they called about Halladay!).
No way on West for Bell, and I don't like Miller for Bell. Miller was the second piece of the Cabrera-to-Tigers trade and trading him now is selling low to buy high on a closer for two seasons. He's still got a tremendous ceiling...let's remember lots of young pitchers start off with control problems.
Posted by: breakz | July 30, 2009 at 12:37 PM
I would trade Miller for Bell in a heartbeat. And how cool would it be to have Hells Bells playing in Landshark Stadium. I hope we make this deal so a 3 run 9th inning lead is actually safe. It sure isn't with Lindstrom.
Posted by: Fishfan4 | July 30, 2009 at 12:37 PM
I have no idea why the Marlins are such in hot pursuit of a closer. Right the Marlins bullpen is one of their strengths. If ur gonna trade one of your top prospects get a starter or a hitter.
Posted by: fishfan97 | July 30, 2009 at 12:54 PM
Padres would be stupid to trade Bell for anything less than West or Miller. If its not a center piece around West or Miller DONT trade him!
Posted by: Mickeykoke | July 30, 2009 at 01:03 PM
"I would trade Miller for Bell in a heartbeat. And how cool would it be to have Hells Bells playing in Landshark Stadium. I hope we make this deal so a 3 run 9th inning lead is actually safe. It sure isn't with Lindstrom"
First of all, I doubt I would give up on a huge lefty power arm less then 2 years after moving your best player for him. The guy still has ace potential. Also, Hells Bells was Hoffmans song. I think Bell has some other song with a pun on Bells in the title. I can't think of the name right now I will try to find it.
Posted by: nrmax88 | July 30, 2009 at 01:13 PM
Better be West and hopefully one or two others. Miller is garbage.
Posted by: marinest21 | July 30, 2009 at 01:26 PM
"Better be West and hopefully one or two others. Miller is garbage."
Haha. Consider yourself extremely lucky if you get Miller for Bell. San Diego is an awful team, they don't need a closer. They don't even want to pay Peavy, and Bell is going to get expensive next year. Keep him, he is not going to help the Pads win.
Posted by: nrmax88 | July 30, 2009 at 01:31 PM
Miller for Bell would be a great deal for both sides. I doubt Miller would succeed in Florida because of that scrappy D, but moving to SD would give him a Grand Canyon to work with. Bell would move from that black hole of a franchise right now and he'll probably get his money.
Posted by: baseball52 | July 30, 2009 at 01:36 PM
Why would I feel lucky to get Miller? He is totally erratic and has zero control. I am pretty sure the Padres could get someone a lot better than him for Bell.
"but moving to SD would give him a Grand Canyon to work with." - who cares how much of a pitcher's park it is if he can't find the plate?
no matter what, it isn't gonna be him. he is hurt and won't be dealt. shoot, guess i am not gonna consider myself lucky.
Posted by: marinest21 | July 30, 2009 at 01:44 PM
Give us an update of Capps and Duke
Posted by: oxfrat1665 | July 30, 2009 at 01:51 PM
1. I'm a Marlins fan and I'm hoping that if it HAS to be either Miller or West being traded, I'd prefer it being Miller.
2. Would love to see Bell close for the fish cause he HATES the Mets just like I do.
3. If you hadnt already put the piecies to the puzzle together about David Ortiz by now, they you need to get some common sense.
4. wildcats08 = idiot
Posted by: xquiles21x | July 30, 2009 at 02:01 PM
"Why would I feel lucky to get Miller? He is totally erratic and has zero control."
Because he's a 23-year-old power lefty with ace potential. Meanwhile, Heath Bell is a closer you'll control for only two more seasons...years in which the Pads will probably not compete for the NL West.
Yeah, you'd be lucky to get Miller. I'm cool with keeping him and watching him become a great starter though.
Posted by: breakz | July 30, 2009 at 02:21 PM
Miller doesn't turn 25 until May of next year, and he posted a 4.00 FIP last season and he has a 4.20 mark this year.
He's already a solid starter even if his command is inconsistent. A 6-6, young athletic lefty with multiple pitches shouldn't be moved for a good closer from the biggest pitchers park in the easier league that's about to hit arbitration.
Posted by: scribbletone | July 30, 2009 at 02:22 PM
"Because he's a 23-year-old power lefty with ace potential."
I agree that if he puts it all together he will be a pretty special player. But that is a pretty big if.
IMO, he has been rushed way too quick and may be losing some of his confidence. The fact that he got worse when the Fish sent him down scares me.
"He's already a solid starter even if his command is inconsistent. A 6-6, young athletic lefty with multiple pitches shouldn't be moved for a good closer from the biggest pitchers park in the easier league that's about to hit arbitration."
- How does having inconsistent command translate into being a good starter? a losing record in his two previous seasons in MLB along with an average 5 ERA is nothing special, not even solid.
it doesn't matter if bell pitches in petco or not, like miller he is a power arm. he is known for striking people out, not for giving him fly or ground balls.
Posted by: marinest21 | July 30, 2009 at 02:35 PM
"- How does having inconsistent command translate into being a good starter? a losing record in his two previous seasons in MLB along with an average 5 ERA is nothing special, not even solid."
He isn't saying that incosistent command translates to being a good starter. He is saying that despite his command, he still has been a solid starter, who was a very highly touted amateur player, and who is a 6'6 power lefty with all the tools of a guy capable of becoming an ace. He just turned 24 years old. You have to be very careful moving a guy like that. You don't want to look back in 4 years and realize you trade Randy Johnson for Heath Bell.
If I were a Padre fan, I would be thrilled with a Miller for Bell deal. I guess in a vacuum it could wor for Florida, because they hakve loads of young pitching and Miller seems expendable, but I am not comfortable taking a guy as 50 percent of a bounty for Miguel Cabrera, and then giving up on him a year later to get Heath Bell. No way.
Posted by: nrmax88 | July 30, 2009 at 02:49 PM
I'm sorry, but it's not a very convincing argument that he has been a solid starter. His career record, ERA, and WHIP in the time he has been up in the bigs have not been that impressive.
Yes he is young and does have a lot of potential. But if he doesn't get his command figured out, he won't live up to anything close he was projected to become.
As a Padre fan he scares me because we have a notorious history of hyped up pitching prospects who do really well in Milb and turn into huge busts once they hit the majors.
Would I be upset if we got him, no. You have done a good job of convincing me there is hope for him. Do I think the Padres could get someone better for Bell? Yes.
Posted by: marinest21 | July 30, 2009 at 03:10 PM
"- How does having inconsistent command translate into being a good starter? a losing record in his two previous seasons in MLB along with an average 5 ERA is nothing special, not even solid."
Miller is 24. He's younger than the vaunted Clay Buchholz and only a few months older than David Price.
Miller for Bell is an awful, awful deal for the Marlins.
1. Heath Bell is very good, yes, but he's still having a career year. And, relievers fluctuate.
2. Saves = overrated. This is a buy high for the Fish.
3. So many low level/failed SP prospects have been converted into decent relievers. Giving up a top SP prospect for a good reliever makes zero sense.
Hell, I'd rather stick whoever the odd man out/6th starter in the rotation is, whether it be Miller or someone else, in the pen and let him share the closer's job with Meyer.
Posted by: melonis rex | July 30, 2009 at 03:15 PM
"I'm sorry, but it's not a very convincing argument that he has been a solid starter. His career record, ERA, and WHIP in the time he has been up in the bigs have not been that impressive."
Miller's also had ridiculously high BABIPs and low LOB% in all those years. So he's pitched a lot better than his ERA.
Posted by: melonis rex | July 30, 2009 at 03:17 PM
"Saves are over rated"
WOW.. really? Last time I checked pitching wins and you need a dominant closer to close out BB games!
Closers are VERY important!
Posted by: Mickeykoke | July 30, 2009 at 03:29 PM
So when the ball is put in play the hitters usually get a hit but he still leaves a low percentage of men left on base?
Posted by: marinest21 | July 30, 2009 at 03:31 PM
"Heath Bell is very good, yes, but he's still having a career year. And, relievers fluctuate."
Actually bell had a better year in 2007...
ERA + / WHIP / BB/SO
2007 = 200 / 0.961 / 3.40
2009 = 186 / 1.066 / 3.2
Posted by: Steve | July 30, 2009 at 03:43 PM
My question is: Where do all those runners go that get hits off of Miller because he had such a high BABIP but such a low LOB%?
Unless he is a double play and/or pickoff artist or an amazing number of runners try to steal off him and get thrown out, it sounds like they score, which is pretty reflective of his ERA. The fact that is WHIP is on the high end of 1.6 does not do him justice either.
Posted by: marinest21 | July 30, 2009 at 03:57 PM
"Do I think the Padres could get someone better for Bell? Yes."
See I disagree.
Bell is a closer with a two-year timeline to FA. He's worth 4 WARP at best. In contrast, teams are valuing young starters highly (see: Phils keeping Happ and Drabek, Sox keeping Buchholz) so you can't expect a guy like that for 2 years of Bell.
Also, nrmax's "solid starter" comment was based on FIP analysis. He's been around 4-4.2 since last year, and that qualifies as solid, back-of-the-rotation stuff. He's struggled this year with an injury and a new delivery, so I'd argue mechanics are to blame.
Posted by: breakz | July 30, 2009 at 04:02 PM
"WOW.. really? Last time I checked pitching wins and you need a dominant closer to close out BB games!
Closers are VERY important!"
Well I mean hitting wins too...so we're not getting anywhere here :P
As for a "dominant closer to close games," I direct you to Joe Borowski's stint with the Tribe in 2007: 5.91/1.43/3.41 KBB...and 45 saves. He closed out just fine.
Posted by: breakz | July 30, 2009 at 04:10 PM
"Bell is a closer with a two-year timeline to FA. He's worth 4 WARP at best. In contrast, teams are valuing young starters highly (see: Phils keeping Happ and Drabek, Sox keeping Buchholz) so you can't expect a guy like that for 2 years of Bell."
Look up the trade the Dodgers just made for George Sherrill. Bell is better than him. If the O's can get two players in guys like Bell (who was rated 8th in LA's system) and Johnson (very good numbers this year in A and AA), than the Padres should get a better haul in return for Bell. Does Miller equal or better the return value of Johnson + Bell? I am not sure.
Posted by: marinest21 | July 30, 2009 at 04:28 PM
If Andrew Miller was still a prospect, he would be a extremely highly rated prospect. I would prefer Miller to Johnson+ Bell myself.
Posted by: nrmax88 | July 30, 2009 at 05:41 PM
I KNEW THAT ANDREW MILLER WAS GOING TO GET TRADED WHEN ALL OF A SUDDEN AFTER ONLY TWO BAD STARTS HE WAS OFF TO THE MINORS. HOW HAS BEING IN THE MINORS EVEN HELPING HIM AND NOW HE GETS INJURED? I HAVE BEEN WATCHING ANDREW MILLER SINCE HIS DAYS WITH THE TARHEELS AND HE DOES HAVE A LOT OF TALENT AND FLORIDA WOULD BE FOOLISH NOT TO KEEP HIM AND DEVELOP HIS TALENT SOME MORE, BUT IF THEY DO TRADE HIM, LET HIM GO TO A TEAM THAT IS IN THE HUNT FOR THE WORLD SERIES AND NOT JUST SOME TEAM LIKE THE PADRES. THEY ARE NOT EVEN IN THE HUNT. HE DESERVES BETTER. I LIKE HIM A LOT AND NO MATTER WHERE HE GOES THEY ARE GETTING A GREAT PERSON AND PITCHER. IT WOULD BE SAD IF THEY LET HIM GO. LOVE YA, ANDREW!!!
Posted by: DEBBIE | July 30, 2009 at 05:50 PM
BY THE WAY, HAVING A 4.50 ERA IS PRETTY GOOD COMPARED TO MOST OTHER PITCHERS HIS AGE. HE IS ALSO A PITCHER THAT DOESN'T GET HYPED UP ABOUT HIMSELF AND SPEND ALL HIS TIME DOING INTERVIEWS WITH THE PRESS AND MAKING A BIG DEAL OUT OF HIMSELF.
Posted by: DEBBIE | July 30, 2009 at 05:54 PM
Hey, ummm DEBBIE....there is a button on the left side of your keyboard that says CAPS LOCK...try giving it a push.
Posted by: Just another idiot | July 30, 2009 at 07:19 PM
First off, of course the Padres would be selling high on Bell. They dont have to sell him. They can keep him cheaply for 2 years and then get a draft pick or two when he leaves. Any team wanting a closer in his prime that is paid about 1m a year is going to have to pay up. The padres do not have to trade Bell, this means the marlins will have to pay a premium.
Second, Andrew Miller has a ridiculous ERA and Whip in the majors. It is not just control, he also has more hits than innings pitched. He is just plain overrated. The Padres demand Maybin or West or go home. I am not salivating over West but he looks better than Miller.
I think Marlin fans have become so accustomed to success from their young players that they think every prospect is a future hall of famer. Lets see, prospect that may not pan out for an All Star Closer in his prime paid cheaply? Why is this even an argument?
Posted by: PadresFuture | July 30, 2009 at 08:06 PM
Andrew Miller is throwing around 90 MPH this year, not that impressive for a youngster who's supposed to have electric stuff. He's lost a ton of velocity off his fastball and slider the past few seasons. It may have given him better control, but it's not like he has pinpoint control so he should just try and harness his stuff. Looks like a garden variety lefty to me.
Posted by: bigpat | July 30, 2009 at 09:09 PM