![]() |
|
|
| |
« Trade Candidates: Outfielders | Main | Odds And Ends: Glaus, Magglio, Halladay »
The Blue Jays want top talent in exchange for Roy Halladay, but we heard yesterday that the Phillies have some untouchable players, perhaps Kyle Drabek. Here's what the Cards and Mets are saying about their top prospects:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
I'm still not convinced that the Dodgers are out of the running.
There is enough young talent there to get a trade done without getting rid of Kershaw, Bills, Kemp, or Ethier.
Posted by: ThinkBlue | July 09, 2009 at 02:20 PM
I think Toronto should approach each team with what they want. If a team has multiple "untouchables", cross that team off your trade list.
Halladay DOES NOT have to be traded, and could still retain much of his trade value this coming offseason - go searching for available suitors then.
Posted by: xlazox | July 09, 2009 at 02:23 PM
Actually, the Yankees have two in the top 50.
Correction aside, thanks for the great work!
Posted by: Ari Collins | July 09, 2009 at 02:24 PM
Yankees have Montero and Austin Jackson.
Posted by: TonyYanksFan | July 09, 2009 at 02:25 PM
Untouchables?
That is Laughable.
Posted by: deeselig | July 09, 2009 at 02:29 PM
Jays have Arrencibia. Don't think they are looking for a catcher.
Sox won't be trading what the Jays want. They could have made deals with Bucholz, Andersen, et al last three years and haven't. This year isn't different and Bucholz is an option to help in Aug/Sept/Oct.
Posted by: Chasing Saves | July 09, 2009 at 02:32 PM
Jays have Arrencibia. Don't think they are looking for a catcher.
Sox won't be trading what the Jays want. They could have made deals with Bucholz, Andersen, et al last three years and haven't. This year isn't different and Bucholz is an option to help in Aug/Sept/Oct.
Posted by: Chasing Saves | July 09, 2009 at 02:32 PM
Jays have Arrencibia. Don't think they are looking for a catcher.
Sox won't be trading what the Jays want. They could have made deals with Bucholz, Andersen, et al last three years and haven't. This year isn't different and Bucholz is an option to help in Aug/Sept/Oct.
Posted by: Chasing Saves | July 09, 2009 at 02:32 PM
This is a devious motivation, but I think the Mets should see what they have to give up to acquire Alex Rios. If for not other reason, this will hopefully give the Jays more financial freedom and more incentive to keep Halladay away from the Phillies. Yes, I'm a Mets fan.
Posted by: Paulio, Male Gigalo | July 09, 2009 at 02:37 PM
The Mets are finally starting to get a few of their prospects within a few years of the majors, I'd rather not see them get rid of all of them for Halladay. Their pitching has been ok, they really need to focus on adding a bat. Alex Rios would fit perfectly in Citifield, and I can't see his price being that high. Bats are a much higher priority at this point than another pitcher.
Posted by: 86 Mets | July 09, 2009 at 02:39 PM
No, Halladay does not have to be traded.
The Blue Jays can keep him, have him dominate the Yankees and Red Sox, and then go golfing in October.
He likes living in Toronto because Toronto is a great city in North America. People like living in Seattle, Chicago, Portland, New York, Denver, and on and on for the same reason.
He does not like playing for the Blue Jays anymore because the front office has proven it doesn't know what it's doing and he doesn't want to re-up.
So, yeah Blue Jays fans.. keep telling yourself you don't HAVE to trade him.
Posted by: withpower | July 09, 2009 at 02:40 PM
So, this means the Mets, Phillies, and Cardinals aren't getting Halladay.
Unless the Phillies want to give up Taylor, Brown, AND Carrasco in a deal, which is an absolute necessity if Drabek isn't going. No way Cards make a deal without Wallace and no way Mets make one without at least two of the Mejia/Holt/Martinez crop.
"Sox won't be trading what the Jays want. They could have made deals with Bucholz, Andersen, et al last three years and haven't. This year isn't different and Bucholz is an option to help in Aug/Sept/Oct."
Except that Buchholz's value is going down, not up. Anyone who has seen Smoltz pitch this year can see that he's done. Last Monday's start is no different. Keeping Buchholz in AAA drops his value when its obvious the big club could use him. And Lars Anderson's value is also going down.
Posted by: melonis rex | July 09, 2009 at 02:42 PM
"He does not like playing for the Blue Jays anymore because the front office has proven it doesn't know what it's doing and he doesn't want to re-up."
Oh, my bad, I didn't know that you were intimately connected with Halladay as to know what he wants and does not want to do. How silly of me.
Posted by: thenerbster | July 09, 2009 at 02:42 PM
"So, this means the Mets, Phillies, and Cardinals aren't getting Halladay."
It's too early to discount anything.
Also Met fans, Rios has FIVE more guaranteed years left on his deal, four of them at $12M or more. I don't think anybody would trade for that kind of contract for Rios's production. Not even the Mets.
Posted by: thephrontiersman | July 09, 2009 at 02:44 PM
And, lmao @ "untouchable prospects".
Writers who write this drivel are losing credibility. It's Roy Halladay. Untouchable prospects don't exist unless their names are Wieters, Price, or Kershaw. That's about it.
Posted by: melonis rex | July 09, 2009 at 02:44 PM
"Oh, my bad, I didn't know that you were intimately connected with Halladay as to know what he wants and does not want to do. How silly of me."
Well, then let's clarify. Ricciardi himself has said the likelihood of Toronto re-signing Halladay after 2010 is small. Very small. His value will never be higher than it is right now, and he'll fetch more vale than a 1st round and supplemental pick that his likely type A status would net the Jays.
It makes sense, They'd be smart to deal him.
Posted by: thephrontiersman | July 09, 2009 at 02:47 PM
I am sick of these rumors already Jake Peavy all over again. He isn't going anywhere. Clubs are starting to value their young "cheap" talent alot more than usual. Although Halladay's contract isn't bad, teams are not going to unload their future and the Jays will not get enough back for him.
Posted by: Bravesfansince1990 | July 09, 2009 at 02:47 PM
"Oh, my bad, I didn't know that you were intimately connected with Halladay as to know what he wants and does not want to do. How silly of me."
Seriously? J.P. Ricciardi already came out and said they aren't going to extend him and said he didn't think Halladay would want to sign an extension, anyway.
It's got nothing to do with knowing Roy Halladay intimately. It has to do with reading previous articles and radio transcripts already posted on this very site, thenerbster.
Posted by: withpower | July 09, 2009 at 02:47 PM
Also Met fans, Rios has FIVE more guaranteed years left on his deal, four of them at $12M or more. I don't think anybody would trade for that kind of contract for Rios's production. Not even the Mets.
Posted by: thephrontiersman | July 09, 2009 at 02:44 PM
Nobody is arguing that Rios is great value...that's why the argument can be made that he can be acquired for next to nothing. He's not having a great year this season, but his numbers on a whole aren't that bad.He's on pace to hit 20 HR's, steal 26 bases, and have over 90 RBI's. He also is a good defender, which would be very important in a park like Citifield. His batting average is down this season, but his walks and strikeouts are on pace for his norms. Nobody has argued that he's playing at an all-star level, but he's still a decent outfielder, and his paycheck certainly makes him easier to acquire for a team like the Mets.
Posted by: 86 Mets | July 09, 2009 at 02:57 PM
"So, yeah Blue Jays fans.. keep telling yourself you don't HAVE to trade him."
***
And keep telling yourself that your team can land him for some cast off table scraps.
Posted by: deeselig | July 09, 2009 at 02:58 PM
Number of prospects in Baseball America's mid-season top 25:
3 - Phillies, Rays
2 - Braves, Marlins, Rangers, Giants, Orioles, Indians
1 - Yankees, Diamondbacks, Brewers, Reds, Astros, Cardinals, Mariners
0 - Red Sox, Mets, Angels, Nationals, Pirates, Cubs, Dodgers, Rockies, Padres, Blue Jays, Tigers, Twins, White Sox, Royals, A's.
Posted by: GoPhils | July 09, 2009 at 02:58 PM
No team is going to set the market with a crazy offer just yet expecially if that team needs Halladay badly like many a team does.
They'll make statements like players "may be untouchable" etc.. knowing that the longer things go they can "up the offer" ..
e.g. Phillies offer Drabek, Taylor, Brown, Marson
Jays take that offer and use that as the yardstick...
I expect the real offers to start to come down next week..
If the Red Sox are even sniffing at a trade no doubt YES Network will be on Defcon 5..
Posted by: cortez101 | July 09, 2009 at 03:04 PM
its hilarious to see these jays fans get all pissed when they see that teams dont want to rape their farm system. go ahead and hold on to hallday, the jays arent winning the al east while hes in toronto.
Posted by: mooNy | July 09, 2009 at 03:04 PM
Mets would be dumb to trade for Halladay with those prospects.. Mejia is getting projections as a future ace while Holt is being projected as a #2.. Davis has had a great year in A+ and now hes in AA where hes recently gone on a HR streak and is killing RHP.. Flores should also be on that list, hes putting up a great avg/obp for a 17 year old in the SAL
Posted by: Baseball Nut | July 09, 2009 at 03:04 PM
Except that Buchholz's value is going down, not up. Anyone who has seen Smoltz pitch this year can see that he's done. Last Monday's start is no different. Keeping Buchholz in AAA drops his value when its obvious the big club could use him. And Lars Anderson's value is also going down.
Posted by: melonis rex | July 09, 2009 at 02:42 PM
Whah?
This is absolutely, 100% incorrect. Keeping a pitcher in AAA does NOT drop their value.
What do you want to the Sox to do? This team has the best record in the AL and no reason to panic. They're not going to bring up Buch when there's no need.
To say Smoltz is done after 1. 3 starts and 2. total of two bad innings in those starts is really shortsighted and a stupid thing to say.
He's a tick below his normal FB velo, but nothing that screams "done"... it's a stupid sample to even discuss at this point, but his FIP is 2.51... but since you claim he's already done, I had to bring it up.
No, as of July 9th, Smoltz is not done. Rusty is a better word.
The Buchholz losing value because he's in AAA is more idiotic than suggesting Smoltz is done after 11 innings of work.
And Anderson's losing value? Really? I didn't know 21 year olds playing in AA - who have one bad month - were suddenly written off as guys "losing value". He's been playing through lower back pain and it's affecting his swing...
I thought you were supposed to be one of the smarter guys on this board?
This is disappointing...
Posted by: carini26 | July 09, 2009 at 03:07 PM
Jays want $20M in salary relief AND top prospects? Good luck.
Posted by: SAMAGS | July 09, 2009 at 03:09 PM
Jays want $20M in salary relief AND top prospects? Good luck.
Posted by: SAMAGS | July 09, 2009 at 03:09 PM
deeslig,
My team is the New York Yankees.
They are contenders with him, without him, whatever. The team won 26 times without Halladay. They won 20 titles before the guy was even born (that's excluding the title they won in the year he was born). They have made it to the playoffs every single year he's been in the Major Leagues except 2008.
If the Yankees wanted to trade for Halladay, they could. They just aren't dumb enough to trade guys like Montero, Hughes, or Chamberlain for a 32 year old.
We didn't trade for Santana.. man, that really came back to haunt us.
Enjoy last place for the next decade.
Posted by: withpower | July 09, 2009 at 03:09 PM
"And, lmao @ "untouchable prospects".
Writers who write this drivel are losing credibility. It's Roy Halladay. Untouchable prospects don't exist unless their names are Wieters, Price, or Kershaw. That's about it."
****
Agreed.
This is a much more realistic appraisal of the situation.
Posted by: deeselig | July 09, 2009 at 03:12 PM
Carini...all the points in your post are very valid, I'm with you on all of them. That shot at the end is not really needed though, Melonis is certainly entitled to his own opinion, and it shouldn't lead to questions regarding his intelligence. He's proved time and again to have plenty of knowledge about baseball.
Posted by: 86 Mets | July 09, 2009 at 03:12 PM
Carini...all the points in your post are very valid, I'm with you on all of them. That shot at the end is not really needed though, Melonis is certainly entitled to his own opinion, and it shouldn't lead to questions regarding his intelligence. He's proved time and again to have plenty of knowledge about baseball.
Posted by: 86 Mets | July 09, 2009 at 03:12 PM
mooNy,
I was trying to be nice and all but you made a point I've been thinking about for a while. The Jays can finish in 4th in the AL East with or without him.
What's the old saying about the MVP award? Why would you give it to a player on a team in last place because they could finish there without him?
Same premise applies. I agree that they should try and get as much as they can for him but I'm sorry Drabek, Brown and then some are as good or better than the two FUTURE draft picks who could just as easily be squandered. If I were the Jays I'd hold him until the offers start flooding in and then try and up the ante. I just wouldn't go more than one of Drabek/Knapp and one of Taylor/Brown and then all stuff around the middle from Savery, Carpenter, Marson, Donald etc.
ANd given my preference I'd give Drabek and Brown. That's two of the top 25 MILB prospects and then solid players around that.
Posted by: philsWSchamps | July 09, 2009 at 03:13 PM
If the Phillies say damn the future...we want to go back to back they should push for Halladay. Would that be enough to repeat? Who knows.
If they think next year some of these guys will be major league ready....I don't think you should ruin the future for one guy. The core of the Phillies is about 30 years old...that should give them at least a few years with an open window.
Posted by: Blinkingfoo | July 09, 2009 at 03:13 PM
"Also Met fans, Rios has FIVE more guaranteed years left on his deal, four of them at $12M or more. I don't think anybody would trade for that kind of contract for Rios's production. Not even the Mets."
Take a look at an article at fangraphs of the Rios/Wells contracts. While they prove Wells' contract is downright horrible, look what they find for Rios. He is a "+3.5 to +4.5 win player in the prime of his career," and also one of the top defensive outfielders in the game. Therefore, according to fangraphs Rios has an excellent contract and should be someone the Jays keep and build a foundation around.
Posted by: s17 | July 09, 2009 at 03:15 PM
amaro is definitely not trading both drabek and brown.
this is a quote from him from facebook Q&A. yes its facebook.
"Q: But it is a situation where you absolutely would not trade somebody? If the best player in the Major Leagues is available, are there still players you would not consider trading?
A: There are.
(Those players are right-handers Kyle Drabek and Jason Knapp and outfielder Dominic Brown.)"
Posted by: mooNy | July 09, 2009 at 03:17 PM
Withpower, THEE NEW YAWK YANKEES!??!!!!??
Posted by: deeselig | July 09, 2009 at 03:19 PM
@Blinking...I think that several of those prospects could be ML ready in a few years, but SP is definately a larger need than corner OF for Philly. Ibanez and Werth will be there for the next few years, and Mayberry is an adequate 4th OF already. If I'm Philly, I'd be more than happy to part with both of them for a pitcher of Doc's caliber. I'd try to base the package around Taylor, Brown, and Donald if I was Amaro. Carrasco and Drabek have a much clearer road to Philly, so I'd do everything possible to hang on to them.
Posted by: 86 Mets | July 09, 2009 at 03:19 PM
It's not even complicated. Roy Halladay is 32 and is signed up for 1.5 years. That's it.
Blue Jays fans want teams like the Red Sox, Yankees, Phillies, Angels, and others who are ALREADY contenders for the World Series WITHOUT Doc.. to basically just let them circle whatever names in the Top 20 they want.
It's laughable.
Posted by: withpower | July 09, 2009 at 03:19 PM
deeslig,
I'm from New Jersey, nobody talks like that, hoser.
Posted by: withpower | July 09, 2009 at 03:20 PM
Carini...all the points in your post are very valid, I'm with you on all of them. That shot at the end is not really needed though, Melonis is certainly entitled to his own opinion, and it shouldn't lead to questions regarding his intelligence. He's proved time and again to have plenty of knowledge about baseball.
______________________________
86 Mets is such a good peacemaker. He is like the only Mets fan ever that I like (and my dad is a Mets fan).
But I have watched Smoltz pitch this year and I think he may be done. He has lost more than a little off the fastball and he just doesn't look sharp. Maybe you are right and it's just rust... as a life-long Braves fan I hope you are right because I'm rooting for him.
Posted by: Brad426 | July 09, 2009 at 03:21 PM
agreed withpower
Posted by: mooNy | July 09, 2009 at 03:22 PM
And Anderson's losing value? Really? I didn't know 21 year olds playing in AA - who have one bad month - were suddenly written off as guys "losing value". He's been playing through lower back pain and it's affecting his swing...
I thought you were supposed to be one of the smarter guys on this board?
This is disappointing...
Posted by: carini26 | July 09, 2009 at 03:07 PM
actually to be honest, ANderson is having a bad YEAR. He had a good couple of weeks but overall a bad year for someone who was projected to be the "next big thing".
Posted by: philsWSchamps | July 09, 2009 at 03:28 PM
"hoser"
I'm so burned.
Posted by: deeselig | July 09, 2009 at 03:30 PM
Seriously? J.P. Ricciardi already came out and said they aren't going to extend him and said he didn't think Halladay would want to sign an extension, anyway.
It's got nothing to do with knowing Roy Halladay intimately. It has to do with reading previous articles and radio transcripts already posted on this very site, thenerbster.
Posted by: withpower
What you said isnt true
This is what JP said
"We have kept him from free agency twice and I don't think we have the resources to keep him from free agency a third time."
This is what Halladay said
"For me, I just feel like it's a different situation. I'm still under contract for two years and unless you force something, create a big stir, it's not even an option for me. I feel like I'm still happy here. I feel like I have a chance to win here and that would be my ultimate goal, to win a World Series here, more than anywhere else."
Halladay doesnt sound like someone wanting to go somewhere else, and JP doesnt sound like someone who wants to trade him - just someone who fears he cant resign him. If they trade Rios though, that changes fast.
Posted by: SuzysMan | July 09, 2009 at 03:33 PM
i'm glad that ruben sees the value of Knapp. If not for a couple of bad outings he'd have numbers approaching Bumgarner. That being said he's not that good but I definitely think you could project him as good if not better than Drabek and people sometimes forget he lost a year of development to TJ surgery. If not for that he could easily be in AAA with similar numbers that he has now and then he'd be as "touchable" as Bucholz is for the Red Sox.
Posted by: philsWSchamps | July 09, 2009 at 03:36 PM
SuzysMan,
Halladay is being a good soldier.
The Blue Jays have zero shot to win. Zero. It's as plain as day.
Posted by: withpower | July 09, 2009 at 03:36 PM
"Halladay is being a good soldier.
The Blue Jays have zero shot to win. Zero. It's as plain as day."
Posted by: withpower
So you are speaking for him, the very thing you said you werent doing?
Posted by: SuzysMan | July 09, 2009 at 03:41 PM
"For me, the best I can do is try to avoid letting it become a distraction and go from there. I understand, obviously, the economics of the game and how the game works. It's a situation where I think if it's best for the team, if it's best for me, then you go from there. At this point, it's too hard to tell."
"My goals have always been the same," Halladay said. "I love Toronto. I want to stay here, but I want to win as well. That's becoming more and more of a goal for me. Obviously, my first choice would be to do it here. Like I've said in the past, whether or not our organization and my goals line up, it's never always going to be that way. Sometimes teams have to take steps back and I understand that. I think you always keep in mind the direction you want to go as a player."
"I don't know if you were to talk about something like that what it would entail. I think my biggest decision would be, 'Do I feel like this is going to go in a direction where we have a chance to win, and quickly?' And that's it. It's hard to tell, but it's not going to be a decision based on whether it's a certain years or a certain number. It's going to be based on winning."
"He knows where I'm coming from," Halladay said. "I really believe, even in situations like this, that maybe he's looking for my best interest, too. Obviously, I'm grateful to have a guy who does take that into account. We really haven't had those talks, but I think it's always been open communication."
"That's a hard question to answer. Really, at this point, I have to do the best I can to focus on my job here. If something does come up, you weigh your options at that point. I hate to put the cart before the horse and start saying I don't want to go here, I want to do this or I want to do that. I think you just evaluate situations when they come up. I have to focus on my job here."
"That's tough. That's a tough question to answer, honestly," Halladay said. "I want to stay here, but I think when an organization is kind of thinking that maybe we kind of want to go this direction and it's a situation that suits the team and yourself, then you have to evaluate that and say, 'Maybe this is the best thing.' I'm really not in that situation yet."
Translation? Toronto is an awesome city but I'm kind of getting tired of the $180 million dollars the team committed to Vernon Wells and Alexis Rios keeping us in 3rd to 5th place for eternity.
Posted by: withpower | July 09, 2009 at 03:47 PM
Speaking to the Canadian Press, Ricciardi said he's not confident the Jays and Halladay have a future once their current deal expires after next year.
"I'm not so sure payroll-wise where we're going to be able to be after 2010," he said. "I'm not so sure that the player wants to stay here beyond 2010."
Posted by: withpower | July 09, 2009 at 03:48 PM
Your quote digging skills need some work, SuzysMan.
Posted by: withpower | July 09, 2009 at 03:49 PM
If Fernando Martinez, Clay Buccholz, Jon Lester, Phil Hughes, and Joba Chamberlain were all off limits for Johan... Then that means every organization has their water mark... If i'm the Phils, I value Doc so much and I won't overpay... If they want salary relief and some decent prospects great, let's talk... If they want to rape me, go somewhere else... I'm sure someone will give you a Bedardesque deal...
Posted by: allabouthephils | July 09, 2009 at 03:49 PM
"And, lmao @ "untouchable prospects".
Writers who write this drivel are losing credibility. It's Roy Halladay. Untouchable prospects don't exist unless their names are Wieters, Price, or Kershaw. That's about it.
Posted by: melonis rex | July 09, 2009 at 02:44 PM"
True but every rumors has Kershaw plus Kemp going to Toronto..
If Wieters and Heyward are untouchable how exactly are Kemp, Bills, Kershaw, Ethier, Broxton and Loney not?
Not directed at you Melonis.
Posted by: 661dodgerblue | July 09, 2009 at 03:51 PM
"Also Met fans, Rios has FIVE more guaranteed years left on his deal, four of them at $12M or more. I don't think anybody would trade for that kind of contract for Rios's production. Not even the Mets"
WAR has had Rios worth 3.3, 4.6, and 5.5 wins above replacement from 06-08. That is 12.1, 18.9, and 24.6 dollars of value in those years. WAR has Rios worth over 55 million dollars in the last 3 years. That is playing mostly RF. He would be even more valuable playing in CF. I know he hasn't hit much this year, but I don't think he is overpaid at all. I think it is very likely Rios is worth far more then 60 million over the next 5 years.
Posted by: nrmax88 | July 09, 2009 at 03:52 PM
Hold on, Its true the jays have 0 shot to win this year and I agree. However to suggest the jays have no shot next year is completely laughable. You all seem to forget the jays were in 1st place in the AL East for awhile this year and that was without most of their starting rotation. You know the starting rotation that was the best in the entire MLB last year?
A healthy Blue Jays team is as good as the Red Sox and Yankee's right now. Lets see how well the Red Sox do if they lose their #2,#3 and #5 starters for the entire year and then some of the guys that you have to replace them as well.
Posted by: Devmac | July 09, 2009 at 03:54 PM
"Translation? Toronto is an awesome city but I'm kind of getting tired of the $180 million dollars the team committed to Vernon Wells and Alexis Rios keeping us in 3rd to 5th place for eternity."
OR, translation - I love it in Toronto and want to stay, but if the team feels it is in their best interest to trade me, and it works out ok for me, I will weigh that option.
Really, you are trying to speak for him by trying to figure out his desires when he has given no real desire other then to play for Toronto. Dont act like you have something figured out or post it here like fact when you are guessing just like anyone else would be. Does he want to leave? He keeps saying he doesnt. Will he leave? He says he will evaluate it if it comes up. Nothing more can be said with regard to fact. To take your interpretation an interject your feelings about the money the team is spending on certain players and such just further shows you are trying to express your opinion as if it is his.
Posted by: SuzysMan | July 09, 2009 at 03:55 PM
nrmax88,
Rios is also 28 or 29, isn't he?
How many more years is he going to be an elite defender? If he is an elite defender for the duration then you're right.. he's probably not terribly overpaid.
But this is Toronto.. they are only a big market team when the team is good. Can Toronto afford to have that much money tied up in him?
Posted by: withpower | July 09, 2009 at 03:57 PM
Also there is no such thing as a untouchable prospect. Maybe some are for Halladay but what if it is Kershaw that is being traded for example a 21 year old? Is Drabek untouchable then? I doubt it.
Posted by: Devmac | July 09, 2009 at 03:58 PM
Devmac,
The Orioles were in first place for a while a few years ago, weren't they?
I'm a New York Yankee fan. I watch all the games.
I worry about Boston, Anaheim, Tampa Bay. You know, real teams.
Posted by: withpower | July 09, 2009 at 03:59 PM
The Phillies should get this thing done. My preference would be to keep Taylor over Brown, but as long as you keep one, they should be OK in the outfield for the next couple years. Victorino is only 28, Werth is 30, Ibanez is signed for two more years, and they have Mayberry around. (Bruntlett and Dobbs have shown they can fill-in in LF as well)
As far as the rotation... they would have Halladay(R), Hamels(L), Blanton(R), Happ(L), and Moyer (L) this year and next. After that, they hopefully could re-sign Halladay and find a rotation replacement for Moyer from their minor league system. If that is how it plays out (baring injuries), it's not as critical for them to retain all their pitching prospects down on the farm, and they would be gauranteed as major players in the NL for the next few years. As long as they keep a few of the Drabek, Knapp, Carpenter, Bastardo, Carrasco and Kendrick group, at least one should emerge as a decent back end of the rotation guy for a few years while they re-stock the system.
With all that said, would Brown, Knapp, Donald, and Marson, plus one more actually get it done for the Jays?
Posted by: Haymaker | July 09, 2009 at 03:59 PM
SuzysMan,
You are reaching and are trying to say that I'm reaching.
His quotes are as plain as day. Who wouldn't want to win a WS ring with the team they came up with?
I've been to Toronto, it's a great city. Living there would be really cool.
But the Blue Jays have been "almost" ready to contend for how many years now?
Toronto has zero shot without either a salary cap or a decade of top-5 picks like Tampa.
Posted by: withpower | July 09, 2009 at 04:01 PM
Oh yeah were the O's in first place without 3 of their starting rotation?
Posted by: Devmac | July 09, 2009 at 04:02 PM
Devmac,
Who cares? Baltimore and Toronto will be playing for 4th and 5th until New York and Boston sign David Price and Evan Longoria.
Then they can fight for 3rd.
Posted by: withpower | July 09, 2009 at 04:04 PM
withpower I find it funny that you say the angels even because Toronto could potentially win the AL west the last few years if they were in that division. Yes the angels are such a great team because they beat on teams that have been horrible for years. They then prove how great they are by losing in the first round of the playoffs like every year.
Posted by: Devmac | July 09, 2009 at 04:05 PM
And another thing, Devmac..
Toronto had the best rotation in 2008 WITH AJ Burnett.
He's wearing pinstripes now, or do you need another copy of that memo..?
Posted by: withpower | July 09, 2009 at 04:07 PM
yes and Ricky Romero is now better then AJ Burnett who was actually bad last year.
Posted by: Devmac | July 09, 2009 at 04:08 PM
isn't that just like a yankee fan, for the last few years to all yankee fans AJ was overrated and not that good. Often saying he's just a .500 pitcher. Once they sign him he is now one of the greats in the league!
Posted by: Devmac | July 09, 2009 at 04:10 PM
allaboutthephils-
The jays aren't looking for salary relief and ricciardi has said so.
http://blogs.nypost.com/sports/st/archives/2009/07/ricciardi_on_ha.html
According to Joel Sherman:
This is not a financially motivated decision. He said the organization is budgeted to afford the contracts under its control in 2010, as well.
Posted by: telemakhos | July 09, 2009 at 04:11 PM
It would be very interesting to see how Halladay's numbers improve if he were out of that brutal AL East and went to the DH-free National League or to the Angels, where he would get to pitch there and in Seattle and Oakland several times a year.
Would he reach 25 wins?
Posted by: Haymaker | July 09, 2009 at 04:12 PM
"To say Smoltz is done after 1. 3 starts and 2. total of two bad innings in those starts is really shortsighted and a stupid thing to say."
I agree. Smoltz had a much better first three starts than Penny. His problem has been with locating his breaking pitches - a classic symptom of rust. I'm not sure how fast he used to throw, but his current 93MPH can get the job done.
Posted by: Little Bear | July 09, 2009 at 04:12 PM
"You are reaching and are trying to say that I'm reaching.
His quotes are as plain as day. Who wouldn't want to win a WS ring with the team they came up with?
I've been to Toronto, it's a great city. Living there would be really cool.
But the Blue Jays have been "almost" ready to contend for how many years now?
Toronto has zero shot without either a salary cap or a decade of top-5 picks like Tampa."
You are inserting your personal beliefs into everything you claim, so I am reaching? YOU say he doesnt really want to be there. YOU feel they cant possibly complete. YOU think he is upset over the 180 million spent or whatever. YOU limit the payroll comments to mean Halladay has to be moved. Everything is what you think - what has been said only fits what you want it to if you want it too, and easily could mean quite different things.
So I again repeat, try to keep your feelings separate from the actual situation - a situation people can only form possible opinions off, not facts like you are trying to portray you opinions to be.
Posted by: SuzysMan | July 09, 2009 at 04:12 PM
withpower...
stop with your Yankee love ... I mean seriously... go overpay for Arod or something .... no wait you already did that... funny how the Yanks bid against themselves on that....
Posted by: cortez101 | July 09, 2009 at 04:15 PM
Lumping together, ftw?
AJ Burnett is what he is. I'm dealing in reality, and you're telling me "what's just like a Yankee fan".
AJ Burnett was in the 2008 Toronto rotation. Now he isn't. I'm not worried about Romero, Litsch, or anybody else in the Blue Jays system anymore than I'm worried about David Price, Clay Bucholz, Brad Penny, Jon Lester, Michael Bowden, Brad Bergenson, Chris Tillman, etc etc.. and anymore than you are worried about CC Sabathia, AJ Burnett, Phil Hughes, Joba Chamberlain.
Your team still has to pitch to Longoria, Ortiz, Rodriguez, Teixiera, Jeter, Bay, Pedroia, Crawford, Upton.
I'm not worried about Toronto in the least. If you guys were going to do something, you'd have done it by now.
Posted by: withpower | July 09, 2009 at 04:16 PM
Hey the yanks are a good team and MLB makes sure they are. I will also say that it is harder to win the AL East then it is to win the world series.
Posted by: Devmac | July 09, 2009 at 04:17 PM
AJ Burnett struck out a lot of batters.. Nothing more.
Posted by: 661dodgerblue | July 09, 2009 at 04:17 PM
cortez101,
You know what the best part about MASSIVELY overpaying Alex was?
How it didn't stop us from getting CC, Tex, Burnett, Swisher, and keeping Hughes, Joba, Montero, and AJack.
Posted by: withpower | July 09, 2009 at 04:18 PM
Hill is better then Pedroia and in case you didn't notice Lind has or at least a couple days ago the highest OPS in the AL.
Also this year I'd take Scutaro over Jeter. Far better defense monster OBP and a pretty good batting average or at least I should say to this point I would.
Posted by: Devmac | July 09, 2009 at 04:20 PM
withpower
Judging by the amount of free time you have in the middle of the day I bet the closest you've gotten to the new Yankee stadium is the TV.. or live streaming on MLB.com..
Posted by: cortez101 | July 09, 2009 at 04:20 PM
cortez101,
You know what the best part about MASSIVELY overpaying Alex was?
How it didn't stop us from getting CC, Tex, Burnett, Swisher, and keeping Hughes, Joba, Montero, and AJack.
Posted by: withpower | July 09, 2009 at 04:18 PM
and YET you still haven't won with him. WOW.
Posted by: philsWSchamps | July 09, 2009 at 04:20 PM
Arod.... WILL BE the worst contract in the history of baseball in about 2 years from now...
Posted by: cortez101 | July 09, 2009 at 04:21 PM
Swisher LOL .... you kidding ???
Hughes ... if he was sooo good he'd be starting instead of Aceves...
please ...
anyways its a moot point...
Halladay is gone... we get a boatload and JP gets fired and someone with better judgement gets the GM spot ... like say buddy from the Twins whose name escapes me ... former GM .. you know ... built them into a legit contender on a tight budget
Posted by: cortez101 | July 09, 2009 at 04:26 PM
cortez101,
Well.. I'm not really sure why you're getting personal. SuzysMan, Devmac, and philsWSchamps have all taken me to task just now.. and none of them resorted to personal attacks. What's your deal?
I've been to 3 games at the new place so far. I sat in the upper deck because I can't afford the top of the line seats. It's sort of strange that you'd attack that. I'm sorry for taking today off work, Cortez. I'm sorry I don't make enough money to sit in the great seats at the new statidum, cortez.
I will try harder in the future to justify my (lack of) success to dudes on the internets.
Posted by: withpower | July 09, 2009 at 04:26 PM
cortez101,
Nah.. the worst contract in baseball is Vernon Wells. Then it's Barry Zito.
Alex is off the juice and killing the ball. I don't think the Blue Jays will finish with a better record than the Yankees for the entire duration of that contract.
Posted by: withpower | July 09, 2009 at 04:29 PM
dude relax...
I don't mean to get personal ... its more a slant on how the Yanks have priced the "fans" out of the seats unlike the old Yankee stadium...
You make my point .... just like the Leafs priced true fans out of the seats when they moved into the ACC ... the Yankees have done the same ... all in the name of greed...
Thats why everyone hates them.
No issue with you at all...
sorry if you thought that
Posted by: cortez101 | July 09, 2009 at 04:30 PM
Little Bear...
Smoltzy has been hitting 91..
slider is crap... not the same arm anymore .... I have no idea why they have Buchholz in the minors and not starting...
Theo is a great GM I'll give you that...
Posted by: cortez101 | July 09, 2009 at 04:32 PM
Actually on cue Wells is starting to play well now that the jays are out of it. He's hitting .419 in july Wells contract won't look so horrible by the end of the season. Wells does this basically every year its like he plays half a season but makes up all his stats.
Posted by: Devmac | July 09, 2009 at 04:33 PM
Hughes should be starting. The team is giving some reason about him not being stretched out. He's been lights-out in the 8th inning and the team has won 13 of their last 15.
The Bombers are tinkering with ways to just flat-out dominate teams this year, like they did when Joba came up and was pitching the 8th.
And you can laugh at Swish all you want.. he's got plus power, plus patience, and a plus glove. He's on a reasonable contract, too. Cost us nothing.
Cashman for the win. Again.
Posted by: withpower | July 09, 2009 at 04:34 PM
withpower honestly I'm pretty sure I could be the GM of the yankees and do a good job.
Posted by: Devmac | July 09, 2009 at 04:36 PM
George Costanza is that you ...?
Posted by: cortez101 | July 09, 2009 at 04:37 PM
Devmac,
If you were GM of the New York Yankees we'd base our whole offseason plan around trading for Ricky Romero.
Posted by: withpower | July 09, 2009 at 04:44 PM
Well first off forget the illusion that the GM does everything. In a lot of cases I think they get given all the information from scouts look at current market values for players as well and then make budgets for different areas for your ball club. If your the yankees you can then sign more high priced prospects from the draft then anyone else can. As well as sign free agents no one else can.
You don't have to be some "special baseball person" to be able to see good talent or have a decent idea of what is good value trade wise.
Also keep in mind I don't think I could be a great GM by any means but you have a lot of leeway with the yankees because money can easily fix mistakes.
Posted by: Devmac | July 09, 2009 at 04:47 PM
Well to be honest if your the Yankees and you need to trade for players your likely not doing a very good job. The yankees in 1 draft can stock their system like no one else can because of their ability to get those high priced guys that go in the lower rounds because of money they want.
Posted by: Devmac | July 09, 2009 at 04:49 PM
Hah I can't say I would of went after Romero to be honest but I surely wouldn't of signed the contract you did with AJ Burnett.
Posted by: Devmac | July 09, 2009 at 04:50 PM
The Yankees are always picking in the bottom of the rounds, usually have fewer picks than other teams because of free-agent compensation.
They've been good about getting guys late who maybe had other issues.. Austin Jackson was like a 10th round pick. A lot of other teams could have had him. Joba and Hughes could have been taken, too.
The Tigers are the ones who signed Porcello to that big bonus, remember? It's not just the Yankees who play that game. Detroit, Boston, Anaheim, and Chicago do it, too. And usually better than us because they pick higher.
We outbid, I believe, Boston, for Jesus Montero. Boston has the money, they could have upped if they wanted too.
Posted by: withpower | July 09, 2009 at 04:53 PM
To be honest while lots of people would like a Salary cap I would be more happy with some sort of real Draft cap. Which is the real advantage those teams you listed have.
Posted by: Devmac | July 09, 2009 at 04:56 PM
If you guys in Toronto would support your team more, you wouldn't feel that way.
Isn't Toronto one of, if not THE, biggest city in Major League Baseball?
Maybe it isn't as big as LA or Chicago.. but I think it's bigger than New York. It's definitely bigger than Boston.
Obviously, hockey is number one. But New York manages to support top payrolls for teams in every sport.
You guys in Toronto need to step your game up.
Posted by: withpower | July 09, 2009 at 05:02 PM
New York has over 19 million people
Toronto, with a population of 2.48 million people (5.5 million in the GTA - Greater Toronto Area)
Posted by: Devmac | July 09, 2009 at 05:12 PM
I stand corrected. It seemed so big when I was there.
Posted by: withpower | July 09, 2009 at 05:14 PM
Also not to mention there is far more money in New York then Toronto. The main thing is tho Ownership is dedicated to winning in New York its more of a business in Toronto.
Posted by: Devmac | July 09, 2009 at 05:23 PM
"The Yankees can get Halladay, but they'll have to part with Phil Hughes, Austin Jackson and Jesus Montero. Cashman should stop being a puss and just do the deal."
They'll have to part with more than just those 3. Division rivals.
"True but every rumors has Kershaw plus Kemp going to Toronto..
If Wieters and Heyward are untouchable how exactly are Kemp, Bills, Kershaw, Ethier, Broxton and Loney not?"
I know that this wasn't directed at me, but I don't consider Bills, Ethier, Broxton, and Loney prospects, since they've established themselves as major leaguers. The people who are throwing out deals with those guys in them are also morons. A contending team won't give up major pieces of their MLB roster to improve in another area.
Posted by: melonis rex | July 09, 2009 at 07:34 PM
Anyone talkin about the Brew Crew in this trade. I mean if the Brewers could send Parra, Escobar, Jefferies(as a token since bad test could be his down fall) and Taylor Green in return I think this could be Braun's wanting.
Posted by: YRofJhonny | July 09, 2009 at 07:58 PM