MLB Rumors - MLB Trade Rumors
Subscribe to MLB Trade Rumors using RSS
Home     Contact     About     Advertise     Archives     Widget     Twitter      RSS Usage

« Braves Could Add Bat; Won't Mortgage Future | Main | Trade Candidates: Middle Infielders »

Rangers Borrowed Millions From MLB

4:54pm: Yahoo's Gordon Edes reports that the Rangers borrowed millions from MLB and will continue to receive financial assistance from the league until owner Tom Hicks finalizes the club's sale. Edes' source says the Rangers borrowed less than $15MM.

Hicks isn't expected to sell the club before the end of the season, so the Rangers will have trouble adding salary at the deadline and could struggle to sign their top draft picks.

3:06pm: Rangers owner Tom Hicks and president Nolan Ryan were among those who dodged questions about the possibility that the Rangers had to borrow $15MM from MLB, according to Evan Grant of D Magazine. One of Grant's sources said the Rangers have had no trouble paying employees and should be able to sign draft picks and international free agents, as expected.

However, another source said the Rangers had a system in place that would allow them to borrow from MLB. If the Rangers have to borrow from the league, it would be harder for them to sign picks Tanner Scheppers and Matt Purke to the over-slot deals they're likely to demand, as the commissioner doesn't want inflated bonuses.

It's unclear whether the Rangers can add payroll at the deadline, but GM Jon Daniels has been proceeding as if it's not an option.



Comments

See, Purke should have fallen to Boston at pick #28 since Texas can't afford to pay him anyway..

Really though, if Texas ownership got hit this hard in this recession and ownership is in hard times, would MLB try and force Hicks to sell?

I believe Hicks had some sort of deadline with his refinancing of Liverpool recently...I'd guess most of his funds had to be used for that, forcing him to borrow in the short term or sell the team.

His co-owner with Liverpool actually had to sell the canadians to cover his half of the repayment.

i'll bet Hicks would LOVE some of that AROD money back!

If the Rangers *did* borrow from MLB, would MLB have a say in how they spent the money? If they did, that's probably a violation of some sort of law somewhere. If they don't, then the Rangers can pay Scheppers whatever they want to.

Teagarden and Salty still hold the same amount of value they did before the season. Did the Sox value Buchholz any less after he posted an era over 7 last year? No. Young players don't emerge over night. Salty is showing great strides this year behind the plate and Teagarden is still a defensive stud.

Sounds like you are more bitter the Rangers wouldn't cave and ship Salty or Teagarden over to the Sox for nothing.

Hey midtown take it easy. Its not the fans that made the choice. They might have agreed with it, but who knows what actually was talked about we dont know the details of the discussion. And you should be one to talk about overvaluing players (ie Lars Anderson)

Midtown: I distinctly remember you saying Lars Anderson to Justin Morneau clone...so let's not act like you don't overhype your favorite teams prospects either.

My apologies: "Lars Anderson is a", not "Lars Anderson to".

Midtown: And Buchholz is sitting in Pawtucket wasting away while you continue to not have a catcher of the future.

Personally, I am GLAD Boston didn't trade for the catchers and am upset now that Mathew Purke, who is going to be way, way over slot is going to be not signed, since MLB isn't going to let Hicks sign them with then in MLB's kitty and Boston dearly wanted Purke.. A wasted pick is what it boils down to, same with Scheppers for a broke franchise.

while you're looking at and criticizing the MLB stats of teagarden and saltalamacchia, why don't you check out buchholz's career 5.56 ERA, 5-10 record, and 1.6 WHIP at the major league record?

Buccholz isn't wasting away in Pawtucket, he's down there so the Sox don't waste service time unnecessarily. That's what smart teams with depth do.

Anyway, I don't know how anyone can argue that Teagarden and Saltalamacchia have the same value they did at this point last year. Both have been incredibly disappointing at the plate and both have now used another 1/2 season of service time. On that subject, at what point are people going to realize that Salty is probably never going to be the hitter he was once projected to be? I realize he's still young, but seriously, the guy hasn't had an extended stretch where he was good offensively since he was in A ball back in 2005.

Like Jason Varitek is doing any better. Difference is our catchers are gonna progress as Varitek fades away. Tom Hicks struggling is a blessing for us Ranger fans. Maybe we can get us a real owner in here and start kicking these stuck-up punks butts from the Northeast

Teagarden has 65 AB's....That is not a big enough of a sample size to gauge how good offensively he is/will be. Salty's bat will come around. You forget hitting .280 with 15-20 HR's is considered an offensive plus for a catcher. The strides Salty has made have been on the defensive point of his game. He has a cannon for an arm and is beginning to come into his own as a catcher. Foot works getting better and it looks like he has been more comfortable with the pitching staff.

Nobody expected Salty and Teagarden to come into the league and replicate Mauer and McCanns numbers overnight...if at all.

Midtown i don't see how the Rangers managment is a joke...your team is the one in need here, we set the price dummy. What a clown

People have been saying Salty's bat will come around since his down year in 2006. Still hasn't happened in any sample size larger than 100 ABs. He has made strides behind the plate, but this is his 3rd year in the bigs and he's only moved backwards at the plate.

".your team is the one in need here, we set the price dummy. What a clown"

Last time I checked, 'Tek was out playing Salty Rangerfan and had not averaged a strikeout once every 2.5AB's.

Boston chose to address the catching situation internally from the prospects they have and it looks like it may pay off without sacrificing any prospects. Both teams win here and Texas will be free to move one of it's catchers to another team after they re establish trade value, or trade Ramirez from AAA roster.

I hope Andy MacPhail calls Daniels and offers him some bailout money for some of those arms they've got down at Low A. That would be hysterical (and, of course, would never happen...can't a boy dream?!)

Not happening milehigh78. Imagine the unofficial cash sale price only from old Bowie Kuhn days is still in effect when Charlie 'O' Finley tried to sell Vida Blue to NYY for 1.5M, Joe Rudi and Rollie Fingers to Boston for 1M each was nixed in '76. It was for cash strapped teams exactly like Hicks and O'Finley to stop them from making cash sales of top players.

Midtown,

I dont think I have ever heard a more unnecessary comment...wow!!! I just hope the Rangers are some how able to sign Purke and Scheppers, surely Hicks isn't in any worse shape than he was three weeks ago when he gave JD the go for drafting both of them!!!

Varitek not outplaying much with that .234 average and is obviously on the decline.

nixa37- Salty didn't make his major leauge debut till 2007 how can he have a bad year in 2006 when he never had a official at bat. He's on pace to surpass his rookie totals this year. Remember Salty is still only 24 and who knows he might have a big second half.

"Varitek not outplaying much with that .234 average and is obviously on the decline."

But he has a +.800 OPS which is better than both Texas catchers. So I don't see the Sox making a deal any time soon.

This is too bad, the Indians and Rangers matched up nicely for a Cliff Lee trade. The Indians could receive a Perez or Holland topped package for 1 and a half years of a very cheap ace.

"Varitek not outplaying much with that .234 average and is obviously on the decline."

Check slugging, OBP, OPS etc..

Yes Rangerfan, Tek is nearly done and this may be his last, or 2nd to last year we all know. Boston has 4 really good prospects at catcher already playing, Wagner was just promoted to AAA after tearing up AA and Fed-X just promoted to High A ball after hitting 10 HR and hitting .345 at low A ball. Both are defensive specialists also and they have 2 more in Exposito and Lavarnway being good catching prospects and doing well.

Nothing wrong with Salty and Teagarden, just that the Sox deemed the cost too high with a replacement more than likely in house within a 1-2 year time frame.

3rd base is the trouble spot short term in the Sox farm system, not catcher.

Midtown, you are officially a joke...I would be embarrassed if you were a fan of my team. And we are not idiots, we know pitching wins, which is exactly why our farm is absolutely loaded with it and why we asked for Buchholz, Bowden or Bard was not going to help us win.

Also, who are you to talk about Holland, Harrison, and Feliz...Feliz has the highest ceiling of pretty much any pitcher in the minors and is only 21 in AAA holding his own, Holland is 22 and Harrison is 23 who could be dominating in AAA like your prized pitchers...and no one is talking about Buchholz after his first full year in the majors and his god awful stats because of what he will be able to do once he figures it out in the bigs, just like Holland and Harrison!!!

"Also, who are you to talk about Holland, Harrison, and Feliz...Feliz has the highest ceiling of pretty much any pitcher in the minors and is only 21 in AAA holding his own, Holland is 22 and Harrison is 23 who could be dominating in AAA like your prized pitchers.."

Michael Main and Kasey Kiker, are both better prospects than Matt Harrison, btw. No discussion about Rangers pitching is complete without these guys.

Rangerfan,

You do realize their is something called the minor leagues right? Yeah, surprisingly enough Salty played there in 2006 (AA specifically) and he was terrible. Seriously man, you're on the internet, you couldn't take the 10 seconds necessary to check Salty's 2006 minor league stats to see what I was talking about?

Oh, and while we're at it, Rangers fans need to stop lumping Harrison in with Feliz and Holland. Those guys are legitimately great prospects. Harrison on the other hand is a back of the rotation starter at best who just happens to have matured very early.

I know melonis rex, we have plenty of better pitching prospects than Harrison, especially the ones in low A and kiker and main as you mentioned, I was just talking of the ones in the majors and Feliz which is what Midtown mentioned.

Midtown, I am not crying, just letting you know how ignorant you comments are. And to answer your question, I hope we try to win with the pitching staff we have this year so we dont trade away our future, unless we aquire some pitching without giving up anything major.

Texas, Boston and Florida I know for a few teams are all loaded with tons of young pitching. There is no reason for this bickering regarding who is loaded.

Texas was ranked by BA as the top organization anyway this year anyway this year weren't they? Think Boston was also way up there.

Boston has young pitching also, but most of the power arms are at the AA and lower levels, Casey Kelly, Junichi Tazawa, Nick Hagedone, Stolmey Pimental, Felix Doubrant, Kyle Weilland and Bryan Price.

Both Tazawa and Price will be appearing in the MLB Futures game on 7/12, Tazawa for the World team and Kelley for the USA. Does any of the Rangers fans here know off hand if any Rangers farm hands will be in it? I don't recall and too lazy to go look.

johns,

when the rosters came out the only pitcher (player) to be on the roster from the Rangers is Feliz, I heard Perez might have been offered but the Rangers said no...thats all I know of and dont feel like looking it up either.

midtown- you seriously know nothing about baseball, do you?

While I am, by no means, a Rangers fan, I think your bashing of Holland and Feliz in particular, is WAAAAAY premature. They're kids. I think if you asked almost anyone in the industry, they'd agree that both have very promising futures. I'm not convinced Harrison will be much more than a back of the rotation type.

I DO agree that Rangers fans can be a little overbearing with regard to their excellent farm system, but that's basically true of every team's fans. I know that, as an Orioles fan, I could talk your ear off about Tillman, Matusz, Arrieta and the rest of our rising young stars. It's the nature of the beast.

Oh, and Melonis- Main and Kiker? Honestly, neither guy has shown enough to warrant real excitement. Martin Perez on the other hand, could be a third stud in that rotation. I'm not sure who's going to fit where, but I think the Rangers will manage to put a pretty darned good rotation together from among Feliz, Holland, Hurley, Main, Harrison, Perez, Kiker, Tommy Hunter, Wilmer Font, Wilfredo Boscan, Carlos Pimentel, Yoon-Hee Nam, Richard Bleier, Jake Brigham, Joe Weiland, Neil Ramirez, Kennil Gomez, Blake Beavan, Tim Murphy, Omar Poveda, Guillermo Moscoso, Doug Mathis, Thomas Diamond, Robbie Ross, Matt Thompson, and perhaps both Matt Purke and Tanner Scheppers. Plenty of 'em will bust, but with all those high-ceiling arms, I'm thinking they'll find at least five quality starters from the bunch.

So midtown can squawk all he wants now...I think it'll be the Rangers fans who laugh last (although there's no freakin' way EITHER Salty or Teagarden are/were worth Buchholtz. If I were Daniels, I'd have dealt one of 'em, taken Bowden or Masterson, or Hagadone and counted myself as lucky).

milehigh78,

As a Sox fan (like everybody here has not figured out I like the Sox and Fish by now) Masterson has loads and loads of stuff, but his future as a starter I am not sure of. He may not have all the trade value that many think he does with his delivery and how he shows the ball, like to LH hitters, regardless of the 95+ FB, 3/4 side arm delivery and nasty sinker and how effective he is to RH batters. His future may really be best suited to the BP, unless the Sox tinker with his delivery some.

Posted this in another topic on this board, but if indeed MLB did loan Texas/Hicks money and set limits to how much they can give to the draftees they they had, Texas/Ryan needs to somehow make it imperative that they be able to sign Purke, even if it mean letting Scheppers go IMO. Purke just seems like one of those super talents that is rare indeed, as well as a native Texan that should have local appeal.

midtown's right.

"They may or may not have promising futures. But, thinking that Holland and/or Feliz would deliver this year at the major league level was downright stupid. You can NEVER rely on young pitching."

Uhm, I am confused. This entire topic you seem to be acting as if the Rangers put all their eggs in one basket hoping to cash in during 2009. Where every team wants to compete, there is nothing, anywhere, showing that this was their one shot in Texas. The Rangers are using kids everywhere, they are just legitimately competing earlier then expected.

Likewise, they didnt think "Holland and/or Feliz would deliver this year", or at least didnt put a whole lot of hopes on it considering neither was even a part of the team to start the season! (and one still isnt) Holland is being used out of the pen, filling a hole and getting a taste of the bigs at the same time. They also have him in and out of the rotation as the need arises. Does that sound like some kind of huge reliance?

And their competing now is a pleasant surprise they might as well take advantage of instead of some master plan now backfiring because they dont have an abundance of depth. So until you stop acting like the situation is something it isnt, you will continue to come off as nothing more then a bitter jerk. Oh, and yes, that is pretty much what you sound like here.


Texas, you are not completely wrong with the way you are handling the catchers. A true, young, controlled star catcher is extremely difficult to find, much harder to locate then a promising looking young arm. And not all prospects pan out, pitchers and hitters alike - no matter how hyped they are. If your goal is to ensure you come away with one of the upper tier young catchers of the future, hold on to both and you can always trade the lesser at a later time. Trading the wrong one early could turn out to be a disaster, a disaster that could be compounded if you traded him for a arm that also doesnt pan out. Your real time is still a year or two away, which you seem to realize already. And when that time comes, you will almost certainly be rewarded for your patience. This year is just icing on the bigger-picture cake you will soon enjoy.

While Purke is a real solid talent, I think he, along with some of the other HS arms in this draft, became extremely overrated due to the overall weakness of this draft in terms of college players and hitters in general. There's really nothing in his scouting report that makes me think he's all that much better than the top 2-3 HS lefties in any given draft. It just so happened that in a weak draft this year that made him arguably a top 5 talent. When you consider the money he was asking for, I don't know if he's really worth it. Obviously he gives the Rangers a lot of value in terms of skill relative to where he was drafted, but in terms of skill relative to his monetary demands I'm not so sure.

Midtown-

The predicament rangers are in? you mean the one where were 7 games above 500 and only a game out of first place? oh and beating the first place team in our division 5 of 6 times already this season? no REALISTIC rangers fan is claiming this is the real deal. But you have to give credit where credit is due. All you have to say is negative. The rangers are a million steps in front of where they were last year at this time without the production of josh hamilton or a milton bradley. The pitching has most certainly stepped up from last year.

Midtown... ur an idiot

Kinsler 5,

I could have called that comment coming from you seeing how you are an idiot as well from your past posts.


SuzysMan,

You said it perfect


coldskeet,

Thank you

A lot of you Boston fans are so greedy. You think you should get EVERYTHING handed to you.

nixa37,

The reason am "jealous" as a Sox fan on Purke getting drafted and just because the Rangers did draft this kid, think that they should sogn him, is that the book on him is that he has not even began to fill out and reach full velocity and also has a nice slurve at the HS level.

As a 19 year old, a lefty hitting 95MPH that is already being projected to add 2-3 more mph and has good poise and control, plus has a nice "slurve" type pitch would really be a nice addition it would seem. Both Texas and Boston it would seem scouted him pretty good.

I was also hoping he would fall down to 28 and figured Texas was the major "holdup" so to say, for signability reasons and just hope that they do not let him get away, when am sure that the Sox would have figured out a way to keep this talented young kid in the pros.

Boston did draft several RH guys like this, Madison Younginer, but down further in the 7th round, Brandon Kline in the 6th and David Renfroe in the 3rd . Kline looks like is going to UVA, Renfroe looks like will sign, as will hopefully Younginer.

Those power lefties, like Purke are just sooo rare nixa37.

I think people need to stop confusing the terms "hit/sit" and "touch" when it comes to velocity. Purke has touched 95. That means multiple scouts have seen him get his fastball that high, but its rare and may happen just a time or two every couple starts. His fastball actually sits in the 91-93 range, meaning those are the numbers he hits consistently throughout the game. That's definitely very good, especially for a HS lefty, but there are generally a few guys like that (at least within a 1-2 MPH) in every class. Obviously there's not many in any given class, but there are a few and they generally aren't looking for historically big bonuses like Purke.

I understand the "hit/sit" as you mentioned nixa37. Scouts are also looking at his projectable frame, being so far a skinny 6'3 and 175 and expecting him to fill out, that is where they are figuring on him picking up a couple more mph on his "hit" velocity I am going to "guess at" at maybe 97mph at the age of 21-22.

Like a possible Nick Hagedone Boston has that was the 1st round pick Boston has and underwent TJ surgery right after they drafted him in 2007 and just returned a month ago, he "sits" in the low 90's (92-95) and "hits" as high as 98mph.

Now, his frame is a tad larger than Purke's, being 6'5 and 230 and LH, but he put on weight after HS and gained velocity.

Midtown-
We are not giving you crap for Penny. Hell Padilla and Penny have the same amout of wins and identical eras no wonder your trying to get rid of Penny. I wouldn't trade any catcher for Penny. If the Rangers had the production like the offense was putting out last year we would be blowing teams outta the water. Were on pace to allow 200 less runs than in 08 thats almost 2 runs a game but the offense is stagnant. I would rather trade for a big bat than that loser Penny.


And Kinsler5 please change you name your a disgrace to all Ranger Fans agreeing with a boston fan what a loser.

Most HS pitchers have projectable frames. That's largely irrelevant to the discussion of whether or not Purke was an especially rare talent. Matzek has similar velocity to Purke (touches 94 as opposed to 95) to go along with similar projectability. James is a little more filled out, but he sits at 90-92 and is taller than Purke. Skaggs is more in the 89-91 range right now, but is more physically projectable than Purke. If you want another reason why I think Purke is overrated, I don't really like his mechanics and already worry if he can avoid arm trouble. Added velocity is only going to increase that risk if his mechanics aren't addressed.

Its not like I don't think highly of Purke or think he's a very good talent. I just think the people who seem to think he's a once every couple of years type prospect are being fooled be a fairly weak draft class this year. He's good and he'd be in the discussion for the top HS LHP in any draft, but that doesn't mean he's worthy of a historically large contract for a prep arm.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment


Top Stories



Search MLBTR

Lijit Search

MLBTR Features



Recent Posts


MLBTR Mailing List

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner


Rumors By Team



Monthly Archives


Live Chats


Tuesdays at 2 p.m. CST



Site Map     Contact     About     Advertise     Privacy Policy     Widget     Twitter     Rss Feed


MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com.