![]() |
|
|
| |
« Draft Updates: Brewers, Red Sox, Matzek | Main | A's, Stassi Agree To $1.5MM Deal »
2:01pm: Heyman hears that the Nats offered Strasburg $12.5MM.
12:35pm: Heyman hears that the Nats offered Strasburg more than $12MM. Scott Boras believes Strasburg's worth several times as much, but it's Strasburg's call in the end and it would be hard to turn down an eight-figure offer, even an "unfair" one. Still, Heyman says there's a good chance the two sides won't agree on a deal.
9:01am: With just 14 hours left before the deadline to sign draft picks, Stephen Strasburg is the one player everyone's watching most closely. Here's what everyone's saying about this year's first overall pick:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
I don't think he will sign. I think he's a fool for not signing but if I were the Nationals I wouldn't bend... I have a feeling Strasburg will be saying hello to Japan or Independent ball...
Posted by: Spheriad | August 17, 2009 at 09:09 AM
Im really not seeing the huge leverage all the sportswriters are saying that Strausburg and Boras have. He can go back to college and thats about it. Boras isnt going to put him in independent league or in Japan where he has just as big of risk of getting hurt and wont make 10% of what he would in the MLB. If he holds out hes going to be a hated man in the MLB. If he goes back to college and enters the draft again next year the Nationals can just draft him again since theyll have 2 of the first 3 picks.
Posted by: Zero | August 17, 2009 at 09:12 AM
I'm close to positive that if the Nationals wanted to redraft him next year after not signing him this year, they would need his permission, otherwise would be unable to redraft him.
Posted by: CubbyFan23 | August 17, 2009 at 09:13 AM
They can't draft him again without his consent....but I agree that I don't see where they are getting leverage.
Posted by: stlcards16 | August 17, 2009 at 09:15 AM
Why will Heyman be surprised if Strasburg signs tonight? Everyone has said for about a year they expect this thing to go down to the last minute. Isn't it common knowledge that Boras does all his negotiating at the eleventh hour? The way I see it, nothing significant is going to happen until much later tonight.
Posted by: DC_319 | August 17, 2009 at 09:16 AM
Really? I didnt know that.
Either way, by going into the draft next year Strausburg and Boras lose since he will no longer be the first pick and he wont get first pick $$. I still dont see him ever getting a better offer than he is getting right now.
Posted by: Zero | August 17, 2009 at 09:19 AM
i wonder how all of boras's unsigned clients not named strasburg feel... theres no way they are all being represented fairly at this point.
anyone have any idea how many there are?
Posted by: elmedius | August 17, 2009 at 09:28 AM
Really? I didnt know that.
Either way, by going into the draft next year Strausburg and Boras lose since he will no longer be the first pick and he wont get first pick $$. I still dont see him ever getting a better offer than he is getting right now.
Posted by: Zero | August 17, 2009 at 09:19 AM
------------------------
I don't think that will have any effect. Strasburg is an exception and his draft position will have no effect on the bonus he will seek, similar to Teixiera and Prior a few years ago.
With the injury nexus for young hard throwing pitchers I would think it would be unwise for Strasburg to turn down $20m+ if it was on the table but I certainly don't hold it against him for trying to get as much value as he can. Hopefully he will sign.
Posted by: DeJay | August 17, 2009 at 09:31 AM
Let's say he doesn't sign. How this affect Bryce Harper?
There are already blogs out there (see http://www.fanfeedr.com/mlb/2009/08/17/the-race-for-bryce-harper-week-1) which are assuming thatthe Nationals are #1 next year again. If that's true, Strasburg's contract or lack thereof will make next year doubly messy. Watch out.
Posted by: DanDotLewis | August 17, 2009 at 09:34 AM
This is why we should take Boras out behind the shed and shoot him.
Did you know he represents the three top picks in the draft and all of them are still unsigned? What does that tell you? There is no way these picks should be getting more money than veterans - - they haven't even thrown a pitch or swung a bat in the big leagues yet.
Posted by: Off The Foul Pole | August 17, 2009 at 09:42 AM
Jon Heyman is a tool just trying to garner attention...since everyone else is out there saying that they think he will sign last minute, he knows making a prediction like this will get his name out there more. His comment is probably based solely on Kasten's comment (strasburg not signing is a 'very real possibility').
Posted by: natskins76 | August 17, 2009 at 09:52 AM
I couldnt agree more.. its beyond ridciulous that rookies out of high school or college are demanding this kind of money.
MLB and the NFL need to use the same system the NBA has where the salary for rookies is determined by where the player is drafted.. This way teams like Pittsburgh, Washington etc. can actuallly draft the best players.
Case in point is Porcello falling to the late 20's several years back for signability issues. The worse teams should be able to draft the best players without shelling out a fortune to get them
Posted by: Adam | August 17, 2009 at 09:52 AM
I couldnt agree more.. its beyond ridciulous that rookies out of high school or college are demanding this kind of money.
MLB and the NFL need to use the same system the NBA has where the salary for rookies is determined by where the player is drafted.. This way teams like Pittsburgh, Washington etc. can actuallly draft the best players.
Case in point is Porcello falling to the late 20's several years back for signability issues. The worse teams should be able to draft the best players without shelling out a fortune to get them
Posted by: Adam | August 17, 2009 at 09:52 AM
------------------------
So you would rather the billionnaire owners get to kept their money than allow a high school or college kid to negotiate a bonus that is still likely only a fraction of their actual value to the MLB team?
Posted by: DeJay | August 17, 2009 at 10:05 AM
So you would rather the billionnaire owners get to kept their money than allow a high school or college kid to negotiate a bonus that is still likely only a fraction of their actual value to the MLB team?
Posted by: DeJay | August 17, 2009 at 10:05 AM
How can you even begin to estimate his value to the MLB team when he has yet to face any formidable MLB quality hitters?
Posted by: natskins76 | August 17, 2009 at 10:14 AM
DEJAY...it isn't about the owners keeping their money. It is ALL about this kid having done exactly NOTHING in pro ball but wanting TEN times what Bobby Abreu got in 2009.
Can you not see the problem?
Posted by: tuna411 | August 17, 2009 at 10:17 AM
If he doesn't sign, I hope he blows out his arm this offseason. What goes around comes around.
Amazing thing is Boras won't care. He'll have a fresh batch of top 10 talent the next year. As much as he trys to maximize value for these guys, he does not maximize what is necessarily best for these guys.
Also, I agree, all of this money for speculative talent is crazy. MLB Draft is becoming strikingly similar to the NFL Draft. Not good.
Posted by: mmontice | August 17, 2009 at 10:29 AM
Put it in this perspective (if you're a homeowner):
Would you rather pay a professional plumber a decent amount of money to fix your toilet or would you rather pay someone who has never fixed a toilet before an asinine amount of money?
It's the same principle.
Posted by: Off The Foul Pole | August 17, 2009 at 10:31 AM
mmontice
At least in football a wide receiver can get drafted and step right into the starting line up and produce. 1 in a million drafted baseball players do that.
Posted by: tuna411 | August 17, 2009 at 10:31 AM
mmontice
At least in football a wide receiver can get drafted and step right into the starting line up and produce. 1 in a million drafted baseball players do that.
Posted by: tuna411 | August 17, 2009 at 10:31 AM
Strassburg is not worth a contract that proven players like ARam,Abreu or Hunter have gotten. History over the last 20 years shows the #1 pick has not always lived to potential. See below
FrRnd 1 Nationals Stephen Strasburg RHP San Diego State University (San Diego, CA)
2008 1 FrRnd 1 Rays Tim Beckham (minors) SS Griffin HS (Griffin, GA)
2007 1 FrRnd 1 Rays David Price LHP 1 3 0 .333 .667 19 5 5 4.60 1.45 0 Vanderbilt University (Nashville, TN)
2006 1 FrRnd 1 Royals Luke Hochevar RHP 3 8 0 .000 .000 42 12 19 5.42 1.43 0
2005 1 FrRnd 1 D'backs Justin Upton SS 254 888 37 .268 .833 Great Bridge HS (Chesapeake, VA)
2004 1 FrRnd 1 Padres Matthew Bush (minors) SS Mission Bay HS (San Diego, CA)
2003 1 FrRnd 1 Rays Delmon Young OF 416 1598 32 .287 .726 Adolfo Camarillo HS (Camarillo, CA)
2002 1 FrRnd 1 Pirates Bryan Bullington RHP 6 3 0 .333 .667 13 0 5 5.08 1.56 0 Ball State University (Muncie, IN)
2001 1 FrRnd 1 Twins Joe Mauer C 653 2412 66 .326 .887 Cretin HS (St. Paul, MN)
2000 1 FrRnd 1 Marlins Adrian Gonzalez 1B 656 2433 129 .282 .867 Eastlake HS (Chula Vista, CA)
1999 1 FrRnd 1 Rays Josh Hamilton OF 316 1180 59 .292 .872 Athens Drive HS (Raleigh, NC)
1998 1 FrRnd 1 Phillies Pat Burrell 3B 1388 4812 261 .255 .843 University of Miami (Coral Gables, FL)
1997 1 FrRnd 1 Tigers Matt Anderson RHP 22 0 0 257 15 7 5.19 1.58 26 Rice University (Houston, TX)
1996 1 FrRnd 1 Pirates Kris Benson RHP 162 316 1 .130 .336 203 69 74 4.41 1.39 0 Clemson University (Clemson, SC)
1995 1 FrRnd 1 Angels Darin Erstad OF 1629 5997 124 .282 .745 University of Nebraska (Lincoln, NE)
1994 1 FrRnd 1 Mets Paul Wilson RHP 97 184 1 .103 .271 170 40 58 4.86 1.45 0 Florida State University (Tallahassee, FL)
1993 1 FrRnd 1 Mariners Alex Rodriguez SS 2127 8166 574 .304 .964 Westminster Christian HS (Miami, FL)
1992 1 FrRnd 1 Astros Phil Nevin 3B 1217 4188 208 .270 .814 California State University, Fullerton (Fullerton, CA)
1991 1 FrRnd 1 Yankees Brien Taylor (minors) LHP East Carteret HS (Beaufort, NC)
1990 1 FrRnd 1 Braves Chipper Jones SS 2125 7690 423 .310 .953 The Bolles School HS (Jacksonville, FL)
1989 1 FrRnd 1 Orioles Ben McDonald RHP 1 1 0 .000 .000 211 78 70 3.91 1.26 0 Louisiana State University (Baton Rouge, LA)
as you can see there is very few that have lived to hype
of being #1 most have been a bust or very average careers
Posted by: ryno23 | August 17, 2009 at 10:33 AM
Ryno: Most of those guys weren't hyped like Strasburg has been.
I think Boras is right -- If StephStras (???) were a free agent, he'd get $20MM++ over 3 years, easy, on potential alone. Heck, Oliver Perez got more than that!
Posted by: DanDotLewis | August 17, 2009 at 11:00 AM
DEJAY...it isn't about the owners keeping their money. It is ALL about this kid having done exactly NOTHING in pro ball but wanting TEN times what Bobby Abreu got in 2009.
Can you not see the problem?
--------------------------
No frankly I do not see the problem, because that has absolutely nothing to do with it. Because Abreu was underpaid then Strasburg should be too? How about Barry Zito or Vernon Wells - I think most of us can agree who we'd rather have on our team out of those two and Strasburg. From your reasoning should Strasburg not be paid as much as them?
Posted by: DeJay | August 17, 2009 at 11:01 AM
How can you even begin to estimate his value to the MLB team when he has yet to face any formidable MLB quality hitters?
Posted by: natskins76 | August 17, 2009 at 10:14 AM
----------------------
Obviously it is a gamble but should we then not be willing to pay bonuses to any draft prospect because their value to the MLB team is unknown? It is less of a gamble with a pitcher such as Strasburg though who is already very developed and by all accounts could probably step into a major league rotation tomorrow.
Posted by: DeJay | August 17, 2009 at 11:06 AM
Facing college players is far, far different than facing major league talent. Let's not crown this guy already.
Posted by: mmontice | August 17, 2009 at 11:10 AM
2 comments I would like to add 1. Abreu underpaid arguements sake yes and Zito and Wells overpaid yes. The difference is all 3 have proven themselves to be all stars at some point of their career, Strassburg has nothing proven at the big league level. As far as being hyped all these picks have been at 1 point been hyped or overhyped--the one exception was Mauer cause the Twinkees didnt want to deal with Prior and Boras. Just because you having a blazing fastball doesnt equal sucess in the Bigs injuries and control play a part in a players sucess.
Posted by: ryno23 | August 17, 2009 at 11:14 AM
I agree fully with Ryno23. Zito and Wells are completely overpaid but they were given stupid contracts after proving themselves in the bigs. Heck Zito was a Cy Young winner and one of the most dominant pitches in the AL, who would have thought that he would have fallen so hard in the NL? What has Strasburg done as of yet? He fanned 10 in Utah. He has huge upside with a 103 mph fastball. But fireballers get hurt and burn out quick. Look at the current rookie bonus record holder Prior, and what happened to him, where is he playing now? 12 to 17 mil is Far more then enough. if he is as good as Boras says he is and can stay healthy he will get a MONDO contract when he hits free agency, until then suck it up and be happy with 20million jacka$$
Posted by: BleedOrange | August 17, 2009 at 11:22 AM
Strasburg is as good as everyone thinks but asking for more then the nationals are offering is crazy for a player who isnt proven at a minor or major league level. who knows what could happen to his arm or if his amazing talent will transfer to the bigs. he could grow up to be one of the greatest pitchers of all time. and at his asking price he better be. but if anything happens to a precious arm like his the nats are out $20 million
Posted by: cyankee | August 17, 2009 at 11:41 AM
I have a question for everyone but especially those writing strokemberg SHOULD get $25 or $30 million or more.
At what level of contribution is the contract deemed a success or failure?
Posted by: tuna411 | August 17, 2009 at 12:01 PM
KFFL has this . . .
MASN.com's Roch Kubatko reports the Washington Nationals have a $17 million offer on the table for first-round pick SP Stephen Strasburg, with easily reachable incentives that could push it beyond $20 million. The Nationals informed Strasburg's camp that the team hasn't ruled out selecting him again next year if the two sides can't reach a deal by the deadline.
Posted by: Chacho | August 17, 2009 at 12:03 PM
I predict he'll turn down the Nats, declare his undying love for the Yankees, and sign with them for 500,000 dollars.
Posted by: Russell | August 17, 2009 at 12:36 PM
more than 12 mil? I hope so....wasn't there a report yesterday that there was an offer of around 17 mil on the table?
Posted by: stlcards16 | August 17, 2009 at 12:38 PM
I hope this leads to the breaking point and forces the MLB to fix the busted draft system
Posted by: 04Forever | August 17, 2009 at 12:41 PM
"Put it in this perspective (if you're a homeowner):
Would you rather pay a professional plumber a decent amount of money to fix your toilet or would you rather pay someone who has never fixed a toilet before an asinine amount of money?
It's the same principle."
Yeah, lets just ignore upside and Strasburg's consensus ace ceiling.
Strasburg may only be an amateur pitcher, and facing WAC conference competition isn't exactly that impressive which does water down his collegiate accomplishments some.
But when you have a fastball that sits 95-99, a hammer breaking ball that's a clear out-pitch, a developing changeup, and plus command, then you're simply on a different level than any other pitching prospect.
I'm not saying that this guy deserves anything near what Boras is saying, and I'm not saying that he's going to win a Cy Young in 2011 either.
But to act as if Strasburg is just another top pitching prospect just isn't fair to his raw stuff and what he's accomplished so far.
The Nats should offer something in the $17-25M range, and if he turns it down, then he can go to an Indy league and risk ruining his arm.
Is there anyone else that's concerned about Strasburg's MASSIVE jump in velocity from his senior year of high school to this previous season? It's just not natural for someone who throws 88-92 to suddenly jump to 94-98 with the ability to hit 100 with ease. That's what happened to Joel Zumaya, and look how much trouble he's had staying healthy. I'm not sure why so few people talk about this.
Posted by: scribbletone | August 17, 2009 at 12:47 PM
:rofl: at the people who say Zito deserves his money more than Strasburg deserves his.
A bonus is a bonus - the kid would still be under team control for at least 6 years. If this bonus buys out his arbitration years (as they'd do if they're smart), $20M for 6 years is a smart deal for a talent like Strasburg.
I guess these same people were whining about Longoria's deal last year, since he hadn't 'proven himself' yet. Tools is tools.
If MLB sets a hard slotting system, you can guarantee that these Strasburg/Harper level talents would find it worthwhile to play in Japan instead of the US.
Posted by: V | August 17, 2009 at 12:49 PM
The Nats Do not deserve this guy.. Sad but true... The Learners have not interest in this teams success... so they don't deserve any success
Posted by: Adam Dunagan | August 17, 2009 at 12:49 PM
Here is another issue that Strassburg might face if he does sign. Draft position next year. Here is a rundown of the current draft.
1.Washington
2.KC
3.Pittsburgh
4.Baltimore
5.San Diego
6.Cincinatti
We can exclude Wash as they probably would try again.
Baltimore has the highest payroll 18th overall from the remaining 5.
All 5 teams have been know ot be cheap.
So next year even tho talented Strassburg might be 6th or lower 1st round draft pick and wont command as much $$. This has happened before with a Boras client---Minny didnt want the Boras headaches and drafted Mauer before Prior.
Posted by: ryno23 | August 17, 2009 at 12:50 PM
If everyone is so convinced that Strausburg is a can't miss prospect assume some risk and build in incentives.
Offer him $12m (initial bonus) plus another $13m in bonuses. Base the bonus off reaching the bigs and performing at a high level.
I'm all for paying people what they deserve. I think most on this board support that idea. What some of us have an issue with is paying the kid huge money when he hasn't performed. Why should the owner assume ALL of the risk. Spread the risk and reward equitably between both parties.
If Strausburg takes off then his bonus (paid over time) would reach $25m. If he bombs he still gets a record signing bonus.
That $25m DOES NOT take into account his earning capability through arbitration. Let's say he's Lincecum v2. He would presumably earn his $25m signing bonus + another $35m in arbitration to cover his first 3 years. By the time he reaches FA that would be over $60m in compensation.
Then again, if he tanks, gets injured, etc the Nats are only exposed the initial $12m.
Posted by: bjsguess | August 17, 2009 at 12:52 PM
"I predict he'll turn down the Nats, declare his undying love for the Yankees, and sign with them for 500,000 dollars."
God I hope your right!!!!!!!!
Posted by: Adam Dunagan | August 17, 2009 at 12:57 PM
"Put it in this perspective (if you're a homeowner):
Would you rather pay a professional plumber a decent amount of money to fix your toilet or would you rather pay someone who has never fixed a toilet before an asinine amount of money?
It's the same principle."
Yeah, its exctly the same principle (rolls eyes at idiocy). Maybe we should just take you behind the shed and shoot you.
Posted by: nrmax88 | August 17, 2009 at 01:45 PM
":rofl: at the people who say Zito deserves his money more than Strasburg deserves his.
A bonus is a bonus - the kid would still be under team control for at least 6 years. If this bonus buys out his arbitration years (as they'd do if they're smart), $20M for 6 years is a smart deal for a talent like Strasburg.
I guess these same people were whining about Longoria's deal last year, since he hadn't 'proven himself' yet. Tools is tools.
If MLB sets a hard slotting system, you can guarantee that these Strasburg/Harper level talents would find it worthwhile to play in Japan instead of the US."
Eactly, well said.
Posted by: nrmax88 | August 17, 2009 at 01:47 PM
"Signabilty" will become the watchword for every draft class from here on out. GM's wont play this game for too much longer.
Posted by: braves4life | August 17, 2009 at 02:22 PM
Agree with BJ's guess here. The Nationals are taking on way, way too much risk with just throwing him $25M, no questions asked. Incentives are a great idea to offer upside to Strasburg, yet protect the Nationals should something catastrophic happen.
I also agree that this "bonus" in no way will buy out his arb years. This is just money for him to sign. Once he reaches arbitration, the dude is going to want $15M per arb year if he is successful.
Posted by: mmontice | August 17, 2009 at 02:24 PM
I really thought this would get done....but with 12 mill on the table and the hours counting down I'm not so sure....I think it's going to take close to 20
Posted by: stlcards16 | August 17, 2009 at 02:26 PM
"Put it in this perspective (if you're a homeowner):
Would you rather pay a professional plumber a decent amount of money to fix your toilet or would you rather pay someone who has never fixed a toilet before an asinine amount of money?
It's the same principle."
That is quite possibly the worst analogy I have ever heard in my life.
Posted by: CubbyFan23 | August 17, 2009 at 03:13 PM
I don't see the risk here with Japan poaching top talent.
1. There is an agreement in place to NOT do that type of thing. It would be a huge risk as ML teams could outbid most amateur talent in Japan. Would the league risk the relationship over a single player like Strasburg.
2. Is a Japanese team going to pay $50m + any living adjustments Boras will want? I seriously doubt it.
A player has no leverage in the US. There is no competing league that can offer the perks that go along with playing MLB. Sitting out a year, risking injury just makes no sense. Players need to realize that taking the best deal available today will in 99% of the cases be better than any other option available to them.
Posted by: bjsguess | August 17, 2009 at 03:17 PM
Here is another issue that Strassburg might face if he does sign. Draft position next year. Here is a rundown of the current draft.
1.Washington
2.KC
3.Pittsburgh
4.Baltimore
5.San Diego
6.Cincinatti
We can exclude Wash as they probably would try again.
Baltimore has the highest payroll 18th overall from the remaining 5.
***All 5 teams have been know ot be cheap.*** <----- say what?
KC spent more money than any other team in the draft last year.
They took Timothy Melville in 2008, Chris Dwyer and Wil Meyers this year...who were ALL signability concerns..and passed over by every single one of your favorite teams.
KC may be cheap on getting FA's..because who wants to come play in KC..then they over-spend on Meche or Guillen because they have to, and get ridden by the press..but know this..
If KC doesn't lock up #1 pick next year, and Washington doesn't get permission to draft him again...then the KC Royals can say hello to their new #2 pitcher behind Zack Greinke..Stephen Strasburg...
no way he slips past us (if he doesn't sign this year).
Posted by: bobhamelin | August 17, 2009 at 03:30 PM
Yeah, Dayton Moore may not be an even remotely good GM, but he's shown a willingness to go after elite talent in the draft, with Hosmer, Moustakas, Melville, Montgomery, Myers, Dwyer and possibly Crow added to the system in the past two drafts.
If only he didn't waste so much money and playing time on awful players like Jacobs, Betancourt, Guillen, Ponson and Olivo, among others, while also having practically no top-flight talent on the team outside of Greinke, Soria and I guess Billy Butler.
Posted by: scribbletone | August 17, 2009 at 03:56 PM
Assuming the Nats are unable to sign Strasburg to a deal this eyar, there is nothing set in stone to say Strasburg signs with whomever drafts him next year.
For example, if Strasburg doesn't sign today, pitches very well in some independent league and doesn't get injured, who knows how much of a bonus Boras and him will demand next year.
$30-40M? Not out of the realm of possibility.
Posted by: mmontice | August 17, 2009 at 04:05 PM
I think Stras is clearly on another level than any other player in the draft. However, let's be real here for a second.
Let's use Tim Lincecum as an example. Phenomenal player, who has highly regarded, drafted early in the 1st round and was a highly polished pitcher. After a grief stop in the minors (13 games) he debuted the very next year and went on to post incredible numbers in 2 1/2 seasons (37-13, 2.85 ERA, 545 IP, 620 ko against 192 walks.
WHAT CAN STRASBURGH POSSIBLY DO TO OUTPERFORM LINCECUM?
The only thing Stras might do better is debut at a younger age.
Using Lince as a measuring stick in terms of time it took to reach the majors and performance, what would Stras have to do inorder to be worthy of a 30+ mil dollar deal?
Let's all agree that Lince would probably command a much higher bonus had he been the 1st overall pick. Let's even go as far as to say he would've commanded a $10 mil signing bonus. What would Stras have to do to be worthy of a $30-50 mil bonus?
Offer Stras $22 mil and call it a day. This way Boras can puff out his chest and say that he got his player TWICE the amount of the highest bonus ever paid.
If $20 mil is where Stras ends up then where the heck is Bryce going to begin. He'll probably end up being the most over hyped position player since Greg Jefferies. And even Jefferies had a pretty damn good career (1,500 hits, .290/.344 line) that CLEARLY didn't live up to the hype.
(I guess all those batting practive sessions in the swimming pool and the numberd golf ball drills weren't enough).
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | August 17, 2009 at 04:33 PM
YANKSFAN
Other than the amount you suggest he sign for ($22 million), you wrote what I have been thinking about all afternoon.
$10 million is the record. Any amount up to $12 million is more than reasonable for the kid. Let him PRODUCE in the majors, reach arbitration and begin raking in WHAT HE EARNED.
Posted by: tuna411 | August 17, 2009 at 04:53 PM
tuna411: I feel than $12 mil is WAY more than enough for ANY of these kids. However, the Nats certainly knew....no...the WORLD knew that there's no way Boras or Stras would settle for $12 mil. If that's going to be the best offer they put on the table then the Nats clearly have wasted everyone's time. The only reason I said $22 mil is because Boras is a egomaniac. $2 mil over the record isn't enough. He floats the idea of $50 mil around but I'm pretty sure he'll be happy if he cans say he got his client 2x the record bonus previously set. For Boras it's about EGO, PRECEDENT AND PRESTIGE. This will set the table for his next bonus baby, Bryce Harper in 2010. Good luck with that again Nats. Consider the Stras negotiations simply foreplay. Boras is getting them lathered up for the next go round.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | August 17, 2009 at 05:00 PM
I just can't imagine myself @ age 20 saying to myself (or parents, friends, girl) "Naa, I'm going to pass on this $12 mil and play in a Independent League or try and got to Japan and become a citizen for a year. Then I'll try for the big bucks next year". I mean there are so many things that go wrong. It's almost like having the winning lottery ticket and not cashing it in because you think there's a bigger pot out there in your near future.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | August 17, 2009 at 05:29 PM
I'll throw my best guess out there and say if the Nats offer $15M, Strasburg would sign. $15M, not matter how much you feel you're worth, is just too much to pass up and risk something happening between now and next year.
I'm with you YanksFanSince78, if someone says here's $12M, take it or leave it, I would have a real tough time saying no. The risk is just too great to pass up a lifetime of financial security before throwing a single pitch past college ball.
Posted by: Papelboner | August 17, 2009 at 06:02 PM