MLB Rumors - MLB Trade Rumors
Subscribe to MLB Trade Rumors using RSS
Home     Contact     About     Advertise     Archives     Widget     Twitter      RSS Usage

« Odds & Ends: Hall, Padres, Smoltz | Main | Nationals Tab Rizzo As GM »

Wagner Placed On Waivers

According to Jayson Stark at ESPN, the Mets have placed former closer Billy Wagner on waivers with the hopes that they can unload him to another team. Stark says Wagner's imminent return could be considered a "glorified audition."

If Wagner were to be claimed, that team would be on the hook for the roughly $2.7MM remaining on his contract this year as well as the $1MM buyout on his option for next year. So if Wagner clears, which he most likely will, it looks like the Mets will be forced to pay a good chunk of the money he's due if they're going to move him.

It'll be interesting to see how Wagner performs upon his return. Should he rebound, who does he make the most sense for?


Comments

Marlins? I don't remember if Lindstrom is still their closer, but if Wagner is healthy I'm sure he would be a better option.

The NL East. The Phillies, Marlins and Braves all still have a need for relief help

The dodgers would be happy to take him I'm sure...

Sherrill has been great.. but I don't think the addition of him and Padilla is enough to beat the Cards in the playoffs.

Good calls. Would the Mets deal within the division?

The Cubs could use him.

"The Cubs could use him."

Yea they could. Marmol isn't a closer and the cubs have reported interest in him.

Good calls. Would the Mets deal within the division?

Posted by: Eddie Schmid | August 19, 2009 at 07:41 PM

I'd guess yes if the price was right. Wags is around for this season, the Mets are out of it.

Johnathon Broxton is struggling and kuroda got a concussion so some relief help should be pretty usefull

"Good calls. Would the Mets deal within the division?

Posted by: Eddie Schmid | August 19, 2009 at 07:41 PM"

I think it'd take some extra "convincing", but probably. The Mets have made plenty of in-division trades under Minaya (Delgado trade, Lo Duca trade, Lindstrom trade, Milledge/Church trade, Ayala trade, Anderson Hernandez back to Mets trade, Church/Francoeur swap, might have missed a couple more, granted none with Philly that I can think of).

True, good examples. I can't imagine Mets would be too picky about who Wagner goes to considering their situation. It also looks like Putz is on his way back, which makes me think the Mets would be even less hesitant to cut ties, regardless of their not being in contention.

Good calls. Would the Mets deal within the division?

Posted by: Eddie Schmid | August 19, 2009 at 07:41 PM

They're not contending this year so I dont see why wouldnt they do it if they can unload some money

How about the Cardinals trade Glaus for Wagner straight up? Mets could use Glaus at 1st base since he cannot throw far and the Cards could always use more bullpen help even with the Smoltz signing using him as a 5th starter/bullpen guy.

yankees

yankees

"

How about the Cardinals trade Glaus for Wagner straight up? Mets could use Glaus at 1st base since he cannot throw far and the Cards could always use more bullpen help even with the Smoltz signing using him as a 5th starter/bullpen guy.

Posted by: mattymo30 | August 19, 2009 at 08:45 PM"

....and the Mets have interest in a rental player, why exactly?

Cards could use Wagner, sure, but the Mets are looking for prospect(s), not rentals.

"How about the Cardinals trade Glaus for Wagner straight up? Mets could use Glaus at 1st base since he cannot throw far and the Cards could always use more bullpen help even with the Smoltz signing using him as a 5th starter/bullpen guy."

That's a horrible trade for the Mets. Glaus has a NTC and he'd be a waste. They'd want 1-2 young players, not some washed up veteran.

Both are coming off surgery and have something to prove for next year. Both could hopefully contribute for the rest of the year while looking for a new contract next year. I do not believe the Mets could get the young players they want for Wagner "icedrake" and "venom", Wagner has not pitched in a year and no one knows if he is going to be worth a crap. The salaries match up well so that is why I suggested it.

The Yankees will put a claim on him and DFA Mitre. If Wagner is even 75% of what he was for the Mets pre-injury, he would be an amazing 7th inning pitcher for the Yanks, and would allow them to rest Aceves and Robertson more. I really wouldn't be surprised if he gets claimed and the Mets let him go for a mid level prospect. It's either the Yankees or the Marlins at this point. If he goes to the Fish, I think they become more play-off favorites.

A) Isn't that the whole point of Wagner's "audition"? Obviously 3 or 4 innings on the MLB level won't be enough for teams to judge on results, but they can see the stuff first hand against Major League level competition and judge from there. There's some degree of risk there, but I consider it a chance worth taking personally.

B) I don't think the Mets are naive enough to think they can get top prospects for Wagner coming off of surgery, but even some second or third tiered prospect has more value to the Mets organization going forward then Wagner does. Wagner can only pitch 15 or so more innings for a non-contender, and then leave in FA, and with his high salary this year offering arby really isn't much of an option either.

icedrake,

You are on drugs if you think Wagner will get '1 or 2 players' in return.

If he gets anything higher than a low-ceiling AA player I'd be SHOCKED. Been out a year and is a free agent after the season (no one will pick up that option, even if he performs the last month).

The Rangers are a team that could use him. Rotation has held steady, but they could always use an insurance policy at the backend of that pen. Could really help them beat the Red Sox for the Wild Card.

I agree with Hermie- The Rangers are the team I see as a perfect fit. I could see them sending a good prospect to the Mets if they pick up the majority of the money, if not all of it. They're going for a playoff run, and you can't waste this kind of season. I can see it happening.....

But....would the Yankees claim him outright? I believe they might. The Mets would get nothing, but Fred Wilpon would be happy.

Yankees? Not unless Mariano is retiring next year...

Wagner has been quoted to all that he's coming back to get a contract as a closer next year - not a set up or 7th/mop up guy. He needs 15 saves for 400. That's his goal. He didn't go through another TJ surgery to come back at 38 for the money...

Billy Wagner will be a Type A free agents.Mets can just keep him and offer him arbitration .He won't resign because he wants to close. 2 Drafts picks or 2 decent prospects.No way the Mets deal him for scrubs.

1st, I'm sure someone else before the Yankees puts in a claim to get Billy.

2nd, Rangers definetly would be interesting since he pitched in Houston all those years.

3rd, He has an option on next year so technically he's not a free agent and does he really qualify for type A?

Rangers make sense. They need a 2nd lefty in their pen to compliment CJ Wilson ... especially since Guardado has been horrid and now on the DL.

Seattle makes the most sense... Not for homer reasons like most people on here who just want to add him like it's a Christmas wish list.

1) Seattle has overused Aardsma, Lowe, and White, they could use a reliable arm to take some of the burden of late innings.

2) The Mariners need a lefty to match up with opposing teams late in games, they have a lot of lefties in the Anaheim, Oakland, NY - AL, and Cleveland lineups, which could make Wagner an advantage towards the end of the season with their remaining schedule.

3) The Mariners are in a position to take on salary after unloading Washburn and paying nothing for their additions Snell, Wilson, Hall, and assorted other waiver claims.

4) If healthy the Mariners could rework Wagner's contract and use him in a setup/part-time closer role next year, so Aardsma doesn't have to work three days in a row and they don't have to lose Lowe for the 8th inning on David's off days.

And the most obvious reason why Wagner would end up in Seattle is because Zduriencik likes to get players through waiver moves. Also, nobody will claim him and paying $1MM of the remaining salary is worth the reduced workload for the rest of the bullpen.

the yankees probably wil not get him as they are the last team on order for claiming rights, hope the Cubs pick him up and DFA Gregg.

I really don't want to see Wagner go to the fish, but if we can get a couple good prospects, they can have him. Its to bad Putz isn't healthy because then we could get rid of him instead of Wagner but that's the Mets season for yeh. Just try to trade away some of the veterans and revamp the farm system.

Why exactly would a team like the Mariners, who are out of contention (hence the Washburn trade) claim a closer who has an extremely expensive option next season and won't be a difference maker this season?

"the yankees probably wil not get him as they are the last team on order for claiming rights, hope the Cubs pick him up and DFA Gregg."

agreed

@PrepLoco

I'm pretty sure Wagner would accept arbitration were it offered him. His present salary is 10.5 million, meaning that his arb-case could not be settled for less than 8.4 million, which probably not coincidentally is more than the team option on his contract.

So the Mets options are:

1. Pay the $1M buyout, and let Wagner sign a one-year deal for $3M with another team.

2. Pick up the $8M option. This would be dumb.

3. Pay the $1M buyout and offer him arbitration. In this case, Wagner is the one with the choice to make:

a. Decline arbitration. Become a free agent and seek a contract with another team. Here's the problem: the team that would sign him would lose their first round pick to the Mets. There's no way a team will want to give up that pick for Wagner. If someone did, they wouldn't pay him much above league minimum. Wagner would be really stupid to decline arbitration.

b. Wagner could accept arbitration, and per league rules, would be guaranteed a one-year deal worth at no less than 80% of his previous year's salary--around $8.4M.

If offered arbitration, there's no way Wagner doesn't accept it. The Mets aren't getting picks out of Wagner. Thus, they want to trade him, and will probably do it for next to nothing, just to let someone else pay the buyout.

mets should ask for a b or b+ prospect and if they dont get the prospect they want they have nothing to lose they could offer him arbitration and when he walks in 2010 mets get a draft pick

"Whoever thinks Wagner is going to the Dodgers doesn't know the real situation for their team. W/ the addition of Sherrill and Kuo coming back the Dodgers arguably have the best backend bullpen in the NL. Their need is starting pitching not closers/setup man and there is no chance they will go after Billy unless he somehow becomes a starter which isn't going to happen."

Posted by: Cub Killer | August 19, 2009 at 08:30 PM

man, you can argue all you want that the Dodgers have the best back-end... but if you watched the Dodger game tonight (where Broxton with the help of Martin messed up the game) then you might change your opinion.

Broxton is NOT pitching like he can.. and you never know when Kuo will fall apart and hurt himself.

it NEVER hurts to sign another pitcher. never.

Unless it's Carlos Silva.

Broxton didn't exactly "mess up the game" tonight by walking the best hitter in baseball.

Makes no sense for the Dodgers to sign Wagner.

Phillies need help .Lidge ain't gettin it done.Cubs too.

Yanks are a long shot.

All the Dodgers have to do is rest Broxton on occasion and let Sherrill do what he does best .

no way wagner goes back to philly; he has done nothing but speak of his displeasure towards his time there since he came to the mets.

And as for the Glaus for Wagner proposed trade above: No.
The trade makes absolutely no sense. The Mets aren't trying to unload Wagner just for the heck of it, or to try to ship him to a contender. They're doing it to get a prospect out of it. Obviously they're not going to get a high class prospect out of this deal, but its better to get a mid-class prospect than to keep Wagner and pitch him for a team that's going nowhere this year.

And the Mets don't need a washed up/injured veteran like Glaus on their team, as the rest of the season is just going to be used to find out who makes the team next year. 1st base will hopefully (well, at least I hope) be manned by Daniel Murphy/Nick Evans the rest of the way.

Teams like the Dodgers,Cards and Yanks have a slim chance that Wganer would fall to them. Here is the current order of teams that might claim him.
Cubs
Braves
Marlins
Giants
Rockies
Cards
Phillies
Dodgers
W Sox
Mariners
Tigers
Rays
Rangers
R Sox
Angels
Yankees
Now I am not saying all these teams need bullpen help but some might do it to block another team from acquiring him. This list has teams that right now have a winning record. Other teams that are fading from playoff contention such as Houston and Milwaukee might but unlikely claim him.

With the uncertainty surrounding Brad Lidge, if Wagner shows he's still got it, the Phillies would have to take a flier on him. If that waiver order is right tho, there's no way the teams above the Phillies would let him fall that far. In terms of 'would the Mets trade in the division', I really don't think the Mets have any leverage in any situation anymore. Just take what you can get and call it a success. That whole front office is probably gone after the season anyway.

As a Met fan I can say that, if you think Omar and Co. are going to trade Wags within the divison, you're high. And, they most certainly will never...ever, ever, ever, ever, trade him to Philly. C'mon people. Think.

There are a million teams that could use Wagner. In the NL the Cubs come to mind, first and foremost. They're a contending team with a gaping need at Closer b/c Marmol just ain't cuttin' it. In the AL there are too many to name.

But you can bank on the fact that Wagner will not end up in the NL East. Book it.

mbl002, the Mets certainly have leverge. They don't have to trade Wagner, at all. Is it in their best interst to? Sure. But they can easily pick up his option and use him as a set up man (ala Putz) next year.

I realize that would not make Wagner happy and it's probably not the route the Mets will take but, to say that they don't have leverage on this particular situation is nonsense. They currently own three Closers - KRod, Wagner and Putz (injured but still). And, when healty, most teams would pay a pretty penny to have them.

b. Wagner could accept arbitration, and per league rules, would be guaranteed a one-year deal worth at no less than 80% of his previous year's salary--around $8.4M.

If offered arbitration, there's no way Wagner doesn't accept it. The Mets aren't getting picks out of Wagner. Thus, they want to trade him, and will probably do it for next to nothing, just to let someone else pay the buyout.

Posted by: cmpieper | August 19, 2009 at 11:31 PM

You're not correct in this case. The 80% rule only applies to players under team control...potential free agents are not gauranteed 80% of their salary.
http://baseball.suite101.com/article.cfm/how_baseball_arbitration_works

It makes far too much sense for the Cubs to not trade for him.

@86 Mets

Thanks for setting me straight on that. I would still have to think that Wagner would accept arbitration, especially in this market. Otherwise, he ends up like Orlando Hudson or Bobby Abreu, signing a well below market value deal (and thus below a likely arbitration settlement), because teams don't want to give up their 1st round pick for a mid-level FA.

I don't think anyone would claim him but the Yankees. He's still due almost $4MM. In this climate, no one's taking on that kind of money.

Forget Billy to Phillie guys!
Wagner has a complete no trade provision in his contract!

To whoever saying Texas needs him!

You dont know your own team. Look at there bullpen and how many guys hit 100 on the radar. They dont need him. The Cubs would be my first guess as to where he will be going.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment


Top Stories



Search MLBTR

Lijit Search

MLBTR Features



Recent Posts


MLBTR Mailing List

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner


Rumors By Team



Monthly Archives


Live Chats


Tuesdays at 2 p.m. CST



Site Map     Contact     About     Advertise     Privacy Policy     Widget     Twitter     Rss Feed


MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com.