![]() |
|
|
| |
« Tigers Talk: Verlander, Payroll, Free Agents | Main | Odds & Ends: Lackey, Bay, Matsui, Wilson »
Cubs' GM Jim Hendry "absolutely" is interested in offering a prospect-heavy package to the Tigers for Curtis Granderson according to a source close to the team, says Phil Rogers of The Chicago Tribune. Yesterday we heard that the two sides were not yet in trade talks, but Rogers' source says that Hendry and Tigers' GM Dave Dombrowski "spoke about Granderson and other Tigers players during the GM meetings earlier in the week at the O'Hare Hilton."
So far we've heard that the Cubs, Angels, and Yankees have interest in the 28-year-old outfielder. Granderson hit .249/.327/.453 in 710 plate appearances this year, though ESPN's Keith Law says he's become just a platoon player because of his struggles against southpaws.
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
as a yankees fan id prefer to sign cameron on a 1 yr contract then give up prospects that could be used to bring in doc
granderson-30-71 guy with a .249 average
cameron-24-70 guy with a .250 average
nearly same production except cameron comes way cheaper.
Posted by: patrick | November 14, 2009 at 10:19 AM
Why arent the red sox in this? he would be a really nice fit in boston. He would be insurance if we aren't able to sign bay. Also do u think the red sox will make any big trades this offseasn? or will they hold on to their prospects?
Posted by: harrison | November 14, 2009 at 10:28 AM
The Giants should get Cameron...Does he play Left or Right field?
Posted by: Black-And-Proud | November 14, 2009 at 10:29 AM
Haha "prospect heavy?" Who are we giving up? Vitters? Cashner? Castro? Gaub?
Please, if we empty our farm, let it be better than a platoon player like Granderson.
I'm only interested in Granderson if it means giving up Bradley, and there's no way that's happening.
Posted by: northsider2613 | November 14, 2009 at 10:30 AM
"The Giants should get Cameron...Does he play Left or Right field?"
Does matter, he's better than Rowand and should play center.
Posted by: Mike Axisa | November 14, 2009 at 10:32 AM
good point by patrick. one of the only differences is cameron is relatively capable of hitting rightys while granderson cant hit lefties for his life.
Posted by: lftyg33 | November 14, 2009 at 10:33 AM
2010 yankees
ss Jeter
Cf Granderson
1b Tex
3b Arod
lf Bay
DH Matsui
C Posada
2B Cano
RF Swisher = World Champs
2011 yankees
SS Jeter
CF Granderson
C Mauer
1B Tex
3B Arod
LF Bay
DH Posada
2B Cano
RF Swisher = World Champs
Posted by: moneywinschampionships | November 14, 2009 at 10:36 AM
my projected lineup is like so.
ss Jeter
2B Cano
1b Tex
3b Arod
DH Matsui
C Posada
CF cameron
RF Swisher
LF melky
Posted by: patrick | November 14, 2009 at 10:40 AM
Mauer is never leaving the Twins. He loves it there, and the Twins will give the moon to keep him there.
Posted by: Agent | November 14, 2009 at 10:41 AM
never say never money can change a lot of peoples minds
Posted by: patrick | November 14, 2009 at 10:43 AM
Agreed, Agent. They moved on from Hunter and Santana with the idea of using that money to keep Mauer (and Morneau) around.
Plus they have a new park opening next year.
Posted by: Mike Axisa | November 14, 2009 at 10:44 AM
he would have to take a pay cut to stay there b/c if they invest all the teams money in both those players there wont be no money for anybody else and they haven't won with them yet with a few more pieces then they have a chance to compete with the yankees and redsoxs
Posted by: patrick | November 14, 2009 at 10:47 AM
Mauer wants to win. If he really thinks the Twins can compete with the Yankees,Red Sox and Angels, than he should stay. If not, welcome to the big market, Mauer.
Posted by: ultimate913 | November 14, 2009 at 10:56 AM
didn't Mauer say a week or two ago he'd be open to a discount to stay with the Twins?:
Posted by: Jay18 | November 14, 2009 at 10:59 AM
What would it take for the Cubs to get Granderson? Jake Fox, Angel Guzman, and a couple more minor league arms? DO IT!
Cubs 2010 lineup:
cf-Granderson
ss-Theriot
1b-Lee
3b-Ramirez
rf-Fukudome
lf-Soriano
c-Soto
2b-Baker/Blanco (right now anyways)
Posted by: jlb1980 | November 14, 2009 at 11:01 AM
Agent, do you really think the Twins has the money to retain Mauer? The possible MVP in the American League? Is very probable that he will ask AROD type of money and to say the truth he really deserve it.
As for Granderson to the Yankees (he's become just a platoon player because of his struggles against southpaws) i dont like the idea of trading for him. Cameron is cheaper and wont cost any prospects. (But sign him for 1 or 2 years at the most)
Posted by: asantama | November 14, 2009 at 11:02 AM
Mauer has already said hes not trying to be the highest paid player. Mauer is a hometown boy and won't leave the Twins and I am glad he isn't its good for baseball that he stays there. No matter where he stays he is going to get taken care of financially so its good to see a young superstar with a good head on his shoulders.
Posted by: redsox22 | November 14, 2009 at 11:03 AM
Mauer is the Twins version of Derek Jeter. I'm NOT comparing them as players, I'm comparing them as icons for their cities. I think it's safe to say that Mauer has a MASSIVE fan base in Minnesota. You can't tell me that Twins fans wouldn't near-riot if the Twins just let him walk on the free agent market without at least offering a respectable deal.
I know it would take a decent amount of bank to keep him there, but a guy like that is worth it. He's easily a top 5 player in the league. My gut feeling tells me that he'd take a (small) discount to stay.
And its not like the Twins are a bad team. They had an impressive run late in the season that got them into the playoffs. They are an ace starter away from being a VERY dangerous team.
Posted by: Agent | November 14, 2009 at 11:04 AM
I'm sure the Cubs will be major players for Granderson. A 'prospect heavy' package will likely include a mix. I can't see how Granderson could bring back a package that clears the farm.
Posted by: studio179 | November 14, 2009 at 11:09 AM
"Barry M. Bloom at MLB.com writes that Twins catcher Joe Mauer is concerned with "winning, not fame." Mauer's willingness to fly under the radar might be good news for Minnesota fans worried that the batting champ will eventually leave town for a larger market. Of course, I'm sure knocking off the Yankees would help too."
That was taken directly from the mlbtr archive.It's not about being paid. It's about winning.
Posted by: ultimate913 | November 14, 2009 at 11:12 AM
Mauer is going somewhere he can get paid and win, MLB needs him to hit the market, every major market knows this so yankees, mets, boston break out the checkbooks because in the end these are the only teams that will be able to afford him, he signs for no less than 140mil
Posted by: moneywinschampionships | November 14, 2009 at 11:13 AM
Granderson would be a good fit in Chicago. I could see him help turn the Cubs back into a playoff team. Who knows maybe Rudy Jaramillo can help turn Alfonso Soriano back into a dangerous hitter as well.
Posted by: redsox22 | November 14, 2009 at 11:13 AM
Does anyone else think that Granderson could become the next Soriano for the Cubs?
I mean, power hitting, mediocre average, plus turned to minus speed want to be lead off hitter?
I can see the Cubs making a strong package for Curtis and then locking him up and regretting it forever...sounds familiar.
Posted by: MLB in the Know | November 14, 2009 at 11:18 AM
"Twins are an ace starter away from being a VERY dangerous team."
This statement is true but explain me if the Twins resing Mauer how exactly they are going to bring that ace starter? With Mauer Twins are competitive but if they are not able to bring good players to the team specially pitchers, they will not be able to win it all.
Posted by: asantama | November 14, 2009 at 11:20 AM
How did a Granderson thread become a Mauer thread?
Posted by: tolo316 | November 14, 2009 at 11:21 AM
First off I am a MASSIVE TWINS FAN! So where there's mauer talk, I am there!
Agent: You can't tell me that Twins fans wouldn't near-riot if the Twins just let him walk on the free agent market without at least offering a respectable deal.
I would personally lead that riot. I'd wear a burger king crown and carry a megaphone.
moneywinschampionships: First off, obvious yankees fan. Second if money won titles why don't the yankees win every single year?? You're dumb. Last Mauer is actually a GREAT GUY unlike AROD or pretty much every member of the yankees outside of Posada and Jeter. Mauer will stay in Minnesota and the Yankees are going down next year. Money is not the only thing that matters. Oh and you're a frickin idiot, just wanted to reiterate that.
Posted by: TargetField2010 | November 14, 2009 at 11:27 AM
Could Jason Bay be had for 4 years, he could replace Damon's contract. curtis Granderson and cameron both are not good options. Id rather have Damon.
Posted by: yankfan1 | November 14, 2009 at 11:27 AM
Mauer is going to be a Twins for life. I hope so, that organiztion needs him. hopefully they win a WS with him. both class acts.
Posted by: yankfan1 | November 14, 2009 at 11:28 AM
I dont see how Granderson is a platoon player? Thats crazy talk to me. 30 hr, 20 sb, 71 rbi as a leadoff man... a platoon player? The cubs biggest needs... a fast, defensive minded CF who is a left and a leadoff hitter with speed and some power. I don't know, but that sounds like Granderson to me. With Fuku back in right, our OF will look better defensively. Yes, hitting a lefty is a huge huge problem for him, but did we not just get the best hitting coach in the game?
And northsider... Bradley will go this year, I think to the Rays. I think we will get Burrell and Sonnestine then package those 2 players with some of our own for a second baseman.
Trades:
Vitters, Miles, Lee, Cashner, Carpenter/Jackson, Gorzelanny for Granderson
It is a lot yes, but I think it would be worth it. Also, hoping to get rid of miles in the deal is a big stretch, but i can be hopeful.
Bradley + money for Burrell and Sonnestine
Burrell, Sonnestine, Fontenot for a 2B (phillips?)
Posted by: Cubs Fan | November 14, 2009 at 11:32 AM
"I dont see how Granderson is a platoon player? Thats crazy talk to me. 30 hr, 20 sb, 71 rbi as a leadoff man... a platoon player? The cubs biggest needs... a fast, defensive minded CF who is a left and a leadoff hitter with speed and some power. I don't know, but that sounds like Granderson to me. With Fuku back in right, our OF will look better defensively. Yes, hitting a lefty is a huge huge problem for him, but did we not just get the best hitting coach in the game?
And northsider... Bradley will go this year, I think to the Rays. I think we will get Burrell and Sonnestine then package those 2 players with some of our own for a second baseman.
Trades:
Vitters, Miles, Lee, Cashner, Carpenter/Jackson, Gorzelanny for Granderson
It is a lot yes, but I think it would be worth it. Also, hoping to get rid of miles in the deal is a big stretch, but i can be hopeful.
Bradley + money for Burrell and Sonnestine
Burrell, Sonnestine, Fontenot for a 2B (phillips?)"
I agree with your assessment on Curtis Granderson going to the Cubs and the impact he could have but I don't think your package for Brandon Phillips could happen. The Reds would only trade Phillips to cut payroll and get some really good prospects back in return and adding those salaries right there just doesn't make sense from the Reds point of view.
Posted by: redsox22 | November 14, 2009 at 11:35 AM
"I dont see how Granderson is a platoon player?"
You'll see by looking up his splits v LHP
Posted by: Deanezag | November 14, 2009 at 11:39 AM
"Could Jason Bay be had for 4 years, he could replace Damon's contract. curtis Granderson and cameron both are not good options. Id rather have Damon.
Posted by: yankfan1 | November 14, 2009 at 11:27 AM "
Why is Damon a better option than Cameron? And saying because Cameron strikes out a lot is not a convincing answer. Damon has a better bat but Cameron's defense is so much better than Damon
Posted by: Deanezag | November 14, 2009 at 11:42 AM
I dont see how Granderson is a platoon player? Thats crazy talk to me. 30 hr, 20 sb, 71 rbi as a leadoff man... a platoon player? The cubs biggest needs... a fast, defensive minded CF who is a left and a leadoff hitter with speed and some power. I don't know, but that sounds like Granderson to me. With Fuku back in right, our OF will look better defensively. Yes, hitting a lefty is a huge huge problem for him, but did we not just get the best hitting coach in the game?
And northsider... Bradley will go this year, I think to the Rays. I think we will get Burrell and Sonnestine then package those 2 players with some of our own for a second baseman.
Trades:
Vitters, Miles, Lee, Cashner, Carpenter/Jackson, Gorzelanny for Granderson
It is a lot yes, but I think it would be worth it. Also, hoping to get rid of miles in the deal is a big stretch, but i can be hopeful.
Bradley + money for Burrell and Sonnestine
Burrell, Sonnestine, Fontenot for a 2B (phillips?)
Posted by: Cubs Fan | November 14, 2009 at 11:32 AM
Please get off my site if you are going to propose trades as stupid as this one. You are making all us real cub fans look like complete fools. Please go to any other site but mine. Thank you for your understanding.
Posted by: Tim Dierkes | November 14, 2009 at 11:45 AM
"Why is Damon a better option than Cameron? And saying because Cameron strikes out a lot is not a convincing answer. Damon has a better bat but Cameron's defense is so much better than Damon"
Agreed, and the Yankees lineup already has enough dominant hitters that Damon's dropoff to Cameron would not be very significant at all. However, I could see Mike Cameron's defensive upgrade over Damon paying off tremendously.
Posted by: redsox22 | November 14, 2009 at 11:45 AM
I dont see how Granderson is a platoon player? Thats crazy talk to me. 30 hr, 20 sb, 71 rbi as a leadoff man... a platoon player? The cubs biggest needs... a fast, defensive minded CF who is a left and a leadoff hitter with speed and some power. I don't know, but that sounds like Granderson to me. With Fuku back in right, our OF will look better defensively. Yes, hitting a lefty is a huge huge problem for him, but did we not just get the best hitting coach in the game?
And northsider... Bradley will go this year, I think to the Rays. I think we will get Burrell and Sonnestine then package those 2 players with some of our own for a second baseman.
Trades:
Vitters, Miles, Lee, Cashner, Carpenter/Jackson, Gorzelanny for Granderson
It is a lot yes, but I think it would be worth it. Also, hoping to get rid of miles in the deal is a big stretch, but i can be hopeful.
Bradley + money for Burrell and Sonnestine
Burrell, Sonnestine, Fontenot for a 2B (phillips?)
Posted by: Cubs Fan | November 14, 2009 at 11:32 AM
Do you know anything about baseball? Those are some of the worst trade offers I have ever seen. You have no idea what you're even saying. Why would teams want someone's garbage for their top players. You add nothing to this topic.
Posted by: Spieg7 | November 14, 2009 at 11:48 AM
Can someone please explain to me how all these people are claiming "Mauer wants to win, etc?"
How does anyone know what he wants? Are they his friends or something? It's like all these people saying Halladay will demand a contract extension to waive his NTC. At NO point has he said this, it's just speculation.
As for the money, the Twins WILL have it. As has been stated, they're moving into a new ballpark next year and will have massive revenue streams from which to draw the cash to re-sign the local kid who's one of the best players in baseball
Posted by: monstermash | November 14, 2009 at 11:48 AM
I dont see how Granderson is a platoon player? Thats crazy talk to me. 30 hr, 20 sb, 71 rbi as a leadoff man... a platoon player? The cubs biggest needs... a fast, defensive minded CF who is a left and a leadoff hitter with speed and some power. I don't know, but that sounds like Granderson to me. With Fuku back in right, our OF will look better defensively. Yes, hitting a lefty is a huge huge problem for him, but did we not just get the best hitting coach in the game?
And northsider... Bradley will go this year, I think to the Rays. I think we will get Burrell and Sonnestine then package those 2 players with some of our own for a second baseman.
Trades:
Vitters, Miles, Lee, Cashner, Carpenter/Jackson, Gorzelanny for Granderson
It is a lot yes, but I think it would be worth it. Also, hoping to get rid of miles in the deal is a big stretch, but i can be hopeful.
Bradley + money for Burrell and Sonnestine
Burrell, Sonnestine, Fontenot for a 2B (phillips?)
Posted by: Cubs Fan | November 14, 2009 at 11:32 AM
Do you know anything about baseball? Those are some of the worst trade offers I have ever seen. You have no idea what you're even saying. Why would teams want someone's garbage for their top players. You add nothing to this topic.
Posted by: Spieg7 | November 14, 2009 at 11:48 AM
I agree Spieg 7. Please look at my previous post. I have taken care of this problem. You won't see fools like this posting here anymore.
Posted by: Tim Dierkes | November 14, 2009 at 11:49 AM
"Please get off my site if you are going to propose trades as stupid as this one. You are making all us real cub fans look like complete fools. Please go to any other site but mine. Thank you for your understanding."
lol.
Posted by: Gleb | November 14, 2009 at 11:52 AM
Brett Jackson/Colvin will be involved im guessing
Posted by: Pistolpete463 | November 14, 2009 at 11:52 AM
"Please get off my site if you are going to propose trades as stupid as this one. You are making all us real cub fans look like complete fools. Please go to any other site but mine. Thank you for your understanding."
LOL that just made my day
Posted by: redsox22 | November 14, 2009 at 11:54 AM
Nice Tim. It's so sickening how people come on here thinking they know everything but they don't know jack about what they're talking about.
Posted by: Spieg7 | November 14, 2009 at 11:59 AM
Reasons why Joe Mauer is not the most valuable player in the AL and why he will not(see: should not) be paid as such.
1) He's a catcher. Catchers play 110 games. For the other 52 games they watch, or in his case, maybe DH. Just in case you were wondering, if AROD were a catcher making 27.5mil and playing 110 games, his prorated salary would be somewhere around 46.1 million dollars annually.
Reasons Joe Mauer will stay with the Twins that everyone keeps forgetting:
1) They already said they would be raising their payroll to between 90-100million with the opening of the new park. Their team payroll this year was at about 65mil, so that leaves 25-35mil to play with. They could feasibly sign 2-3 of the top free agent relievers, sign Beltre, and still have money for Mauer's extension. Remember, Mauer made 12.5mil this year, so a 7.5mil bump to 20/year isn't going to bust their budget anymore.
Posted by: GScott | November 14, 2009 at 12:08 PM
haha wow. I just saw Tim drop the hammer. Attaboy! Too bad the cubs didn't get Mark Cuban as their owner. That would have made for some interesting PR fights in the papers (and real fights in the bars) of Chicago.
Posted by: GScott | November 14, 2009 at 12:11 PM
If the Cubs are going to trade their top 4 minor leaguers call Toronto and see what it takes to get Roy Halladay. He'll help the Cubs win 3 or 4 times as many games as Granderson...
Posted by: Lilkenny | November 14, 2009 at 12:12 PM
Dear Tim:
Fantastic response to Cubs Fan. You have shown a great deal of intelligence. You are my hero of the day.
I'm pretty sure Cubs Fan is just Albert Pujols in disguise trying to post the Cubs gutting their farm system for Granderson in hopes Hendry will see it.
Posted by: cubs223425 | November 14, 2009 at 12:13 PM
Mauer grew up in Minnesota and has his house out in the woods and likes it there, he goes there everyday and not just off days/ He is living how he wants and has openly stated he wants to stay on the Twins. Mauer doesnt like the big City's so why would he want to go to the Yankees?
Posted by: brewsers | November 14, 2009 at 12:15 PM
GScott did you ever think about where Mauer wants to play or if big if he wants to actually win a damn ring while makeing market value money
Posted by: moneywinschampionships | November 14, 2009 at 12:16 PM
Get Granderson for Coke, Melky, and Romine. They will do it. Theyre shopping Laird and Romine could be a great defensive catcher in their pitching park.
Granderson batted 180 against southpaws. Thats horrible. But put him in a lineup with 5 players who hit better against lefties then righties ( 7 if you add damon and matsui).
Granderson is an old school player he is an excellent baserunner. Not as aggressive on the bases as you would like. And could be a teacher to Gardner how Henderson was to Reyes. I know thats a completely different story but it would do Gardner wonders if he had somebody who had the same tools as him on the club.
My lineup would be
Jeter
Granderson CF
Tex
Arod
Matsui DH (gota sign him)
Posada
Cano
Swisher RF
Gardner LF (Till Jacksons ready)
After this year give up Matsui's DH for Montero
Sign Harden, sign R Soriano (new L setup), Sign Nady (comes back 2 months later can fill in for injuries or if swisher struggles), Sign Hairstons JR
Trade Marte for John Mayberry Jr to Philly
Posted by: vinnie g | November 14, 2009 at 12:17 PM
"I'm sure the Cubs will be major players for Granderson. A 'prospect heavy' package will likely include a mix. I can't see how Granderson could bring back a package that clears the farm.
Posted by: studio179 | November 14, 2009 at 11:09 AM"
You fail to understand how stupid Jim Hendry truly is. He may trade Vitters, Cashner, Castro, Wells, Samardzija, and Ramirez for Granderson.
Remember, he was dumb enough to give Soriano 7 years and he signed Bradley. It's not like he's much of a thinker when he does things.
Posted by: cubs223425 | November 14, 2009 at 12:18 PM
vinnie g: When you say "R Soriano (new L setup), does the "L," mean lefty? Because Soriano is most definitely a righty.
Posted by: cubs223425 | November 14, 2009 at 12:20 PM
"I dont see how Granderson is a platoon player?"
Here's how:
.183/.245/.239
That's Granderson's line vs. LHP last season.
.202/.261/.309
That's Granderson vs. LHP since 2007. He's the personification of a platoon guy.
Posted by: vtadave | November 14, 2009 at 12:20 PM
2011
Jeter
Cano (quote this. he will be top 5s for mvp next year)
Mauer (im a typical yankee fan)
Arod
Tex
Montero DH
Nady RF
Granderson LF
Jackson CF
swisher will be free. but they'll sign him again to be a 4th
Posted by: vinnie g | November 14, 2009 at 12:24 PM
"Get Granderson for Coke, Melky, and Romine. They will do it."
And the horrible trade proposals go on...
Do you people even re-read the comments you write?
Please re-read what Tim said in regards to Cubs Fan and apply it to yourself.
Kthnxbye.
Posted by: Gleb | November 14, 2009 at 12:28 PM
If I was the GM I would want Fox, fontenot and wells for Granderson
Posted by: Tigers | November 14, 2009 at 12:30 PM
GScott: You are part absolutely right and part absolutely wrong here. You had the exact same thinking as I did with the payroll. MIN is going to raise their payroll by 30% or more, it appears, so giving Mauer a big raise is both pertinent and an easy thing to pay for. Adding $25-35 million, and $7-9 going to Mauer is completely reasonable and realistic.
However, your statement of catchers playing 110 games is dead wrong. There were 17 catchers in 110+ games, 12 in 120+, 10 in 130, 4 in 140+, with Kurt Suzuki leading the way with 147 games played (135 at C; 8 at DH). In 5 full seasons, Mauer has played in an average of 115 games per season at C, though those numbers were a bit curtailed due to injuries.
There are instances where Cs DH, but most aren't good enough hitters to DH, like Pierzynski, who DHed in just one game, but played 131 at C. Really, only Mauer and Kurt Suzuki are good enough hitters to DH (of course, NL catchers excluded).
Posted by: cubs223425 | November 14, 2009 at 12:31 PM
The best left-handed pitcher in the NL Central pitches for the Cubs. Carpenter, Wainwright, Gallardo, Oswalt, Harang, Arroyo, Cueto, all right handed. I guess Wandy Rodriguez might be cause for Granderson to sit if he were traded to the Cubs.
Does anyone think it would be a good idea for the Cubs to hold on to Vitters if it means passing up Granderson? Castro? Cashner? It's surprising, everyone always rags on the Cubs prospects yet when it comes time to turn them into talent people say they shouldn't. Or they talk about their fantasy Yankee lineups. Whatever.
If I were Jim Hendry I do the best I could to acquire Granderson and then tell Jaramillo to make him competent against lefties. I'd also do my best to resign Reed Johnson so that Granderson could sit against tough lefties and there wouldn't be a huge drop off.
Posted by: pageian | November 14, 2009 at 12:31 PM
Tigers: You would actually WANT Fontenot? I didn't know anyone wanted him. He is a Super Two now, so he's going to be making considerably more money in '10. I would think they would prefer Andres Blanco, who is a solid middle infielder with the glove.
Posted by: cubs223425 | November 14, 2009 at 12:33 PM
vinnie g: So after all this time, the Yankees Superman catcher prospect is going to be a DH? LOLz. I'm pretty sure they would go get some juicer with bad knees to DH. Maybe they could bring Giambi back!
Posted by: cubs223425 | November 14, 2009 at 12:35 PM
Yeah I live in Detriot and I saw the Cubs in town I think Blanco is a good player . I also want hoffpaiur.
Posted by: Tigers | November 14, 2009 at 12:35 PM
I'm a Yankees fan and I definitely want to get Granderson. I may start my offer from Austin Jackson plus Kennedy. But I really have no ideal whether it is eanough or not. Nowadays no team want to trade their top prospects. To Cubs fans, what kinds of package do you think the Cubs should offer?
Posted by: kan tong | November 14, 2009 at 12:38 PM
Tim: There is one thing I wonder. With the way you fantastically told Cubs Fan off, you missed one thing: what kind of package do YOU think the Tigers will want from the Cubs and what the Cubs would/should give up for him?
I would think Vitters and Castro to be the only untouchable prospects, given their ages and where they play. Ramirez isn't getting younger, and we don't know what his shoulder will be like long-term, so the Cubs would be dead at 3B if they traded Vitters and Rammy never quite bounces back. Castro is a skilled SS. That's enough in and of itself. I wouldn't mind trading Cashner, but I'd prefer not.
Posted by: cubs223425 | November 14, 2009 at 12:39 PM
Seriously Tim. I love your site and you can feel free to kick me off if you object to my statement (I’ll rise like the Phoenix and come back as YanksFanSince79 haha).. I can tolerate fans that make crazy and unrealistic trade proposals a lot more than I can posters who come here to simply say "I hate this team so I’ll have a negative reaction to anything regarding them" or to personally attack fans of other teams on a personal, usually vulgar level. I know a trade proposal like Brett Gardner and Ian Kennedy for Roy Halladay may frustrate and ruin a thread but I've heard a lot worse that usually has nothing to do with the subject matter. Stuff that is said out of hate for a team, etc and usually ends up being nothing about baseball at all.
I myself have written up trade proposals that, after some thought, I simply didn’t post. I’ve also posted some proposals that were smashed by others.
Just my opinion, but once you start booting people for bad trade proposal this site starts to take on an air of elitism. I don’t know if the poster is 41 or 14 yrs of age but a trade proposal is an innocuous post that, IMO, shouldn’t require them being banned or kicked off the site. Maybe in time and after becoming a more knowledgeable baseball fan, that person will have more insightful posts to contribute?
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | November 14, 2009 at 12:39 PM
Why does yankees need Granderson I say cubs I would trade him to for Fox, Wells , Vitters, and Blanco .
Posted by: Tigers | November 14, 2009 at 12:42 PM
If I were a Cubs fan I would pass...
Posted by: Lilkenny | November 14, 2009 at 12:43 PM
Granderson for Soriano?????
Posted by: Tigers | November 14, 2009 at 12:43 PM
vinnie g: So after all this time, the Yankees Superman catcher prospect is going to be a DH? LOLz. I'm pretty sure they would go get some juicer with bad knees to DH. Maybe they could bring Giambi back!
Posted by: cubs223425 | November 14, 2009 at 12:35 PM
---------
Almost perfect timing...lol
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | November 14, 2009 at 12:43 PM
Tigers: You want Hoffpauir too?! You want a 30-year-old (on Opening Day--DoB 3/1/80) backup? He has decent power, but his defense is pretty crappy in the OF. He can hit 20-25 HR, but I would think you would rather take Fox as a DH, as he has legit 30 HR power. Oh, and Hoffpauir hit .239 last year, haha.
Shoot, if the Cubs can get Grandy while giving up stinkers like Fontenot and Hoffpauir, I will throw the biggest party EVER.
Posted by: cubs223425 | November 14, 2009 at 12:43 PM
"My lineup would be
Jeter
Granderson CF
Tex
Arod
Matsui DH (gota sign him)
Posada
Cano
Swisher RF
Gardner LF (Till Jacksons ready)
After this year give up Matsui's DH for Montero
Sign Harden, sign R Soriano (new L setup), Sign Nady (comes back 2 months later can fill in for injuries or if swisher struggles), Sign Hairstons JR
Trade Marte for John Mayberry Jr to Philly"
Um why would gardner be playing LF? makes no sense his only real value is his defense and speed. He's a much better defensive CF than Granderson.
Not to mention the Yankees aren't going to trade for Granderson unless they can get him for basically nothing (like swisher). When has Cashman traded any of his top prospects for players. It won't happen.
The Yanks are also trying to cut payroll or maintain so how exactly do you see them signing Mauer. Their not going to. Posada's also on contract through 2011 so where does he go? Montero just automatically DH also makes no sense the Yanks are going to do everything possible to keep him behind the dish because he will be incredibly valuable and cheap for several years.
If the yanks spend significant money in 2010-2011 offseasons it will be on starting pitchers, pretty sure there offense is already a juggernaut.
Injury prone Harden that throws 5 innings per game in the NL central will not be here, rafael soriano will want closer money and is also injury prone, nady would be nice to keep around but this is his 2nd TJ surgery he may not even make a full recovery from it.
Posted by: nbbaseball51 | November 14, 2009 at 12:45 PM
Granderson for Soriano ???
Posted by: Tigers | November 14, 2009 at 12:47 PM
Granderson as an angel here wold be the lineup if we don't sign Guerreruo or Figgins
macier Izturis/Erick Ayabar ss
kendry Morales 1b
Curtis Granderson lf
Torri Hunter cf
Bobby abreu RF
Howie Kendrick 2b
brandon Wood 3b
Brandon wood if called up other wise ayabar
Posted by: TradeguyGMtoday | November 14, 2009 at 12:47 PM
YFS78: Does this mean Tim can kick you off 30 or so times, and you will become a bandwagon YankeesFanSince09? HAHAHA
Posted by: cubs223425 | November 14, 2009 at 12:47 PM
Why does yankees need Granderson I say cubs I would trade him to for Fox, Wells , Vitters, and Blanco .
Posted by: Tigers | November 14, 2009 at 12:42 PM
He will be a big upgrade in CF even though he can't hit LHP. The Yankees can also put him in LF and find a corner OF who can hit LHP. It shouldn't be difficult to find one.
Posted by: kan tong | November 14, 2009 at 12:48 PM
Is Brandon Wood even good he only had 1 hr last year.
Posted by: Tigers | November 14, 2009 at 12:49 PM
Tigers: Hell no. The future at SS and 3B and the only young SP that has shown MLB success with the Cubs for a CF that hits like a one-armed hobo blindfolded against lefties? PASS
Posted by: cubs223425 | November 14, 2009 at 12:50 PM
Do people who try to diminish Harden by saying he throws 5 innings in the NL remember he played in the AL for Oakland before...?_?
Harden is Filthy when healthy, don't hate.
Posted by: Gleb | November 14, 2009 at 12:50 PM
Lol. In defense of Cubs Fan every team has those kinds of fans. I suppose the Cubs popularity and national exposure just bring them out of the woodwork more. There aren't any shortage of Yankee or Red Sox fans who make up silly trades as well. I think the difference is that they really think they're entitled to other teams best players for their slop.
Posted by: pageian | November 14, 2009 at 12:50 PM
Granderson for Soriano...
not happening the tigers are looking for salary relief
more realistically but still not going to happen because the tigers don't want him would be mags for bradley
Posted by: nbbaseball51 | November 14, 2009 at 12:52 PM
We need a 2nd base polanco is leaving .
Posted by: Tigers | November 14, 2009 at 12:52 PM
No we don't want Bradley he sucks
Posted by: Tigers | November 14, 2009 at 12:53 PM
Haha..hopefully it won't come to that. I've got pride too....oh not really. I love this site..lol
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | November 14, 2009 at 12:54 PM
We don't need Granderson we have Wilkin Ramirez, Raburn , thomas and Thames
Posted by: Tigers | November 14, 2009 at 12:54 PM
Yea Harden is filthy, but he doesn't pitch deep into games very often in the NL central.
How do you expect him to pitch deep into games in the offensive minded AL east with a DH as well...he is nasty but he throws too many pitches he needs to stay in the NL...
Posted by: nbbaseball51 | November 14, 2009 at 12:55 PM
Tigers: Scott Sizemore--24 years old on Opening Day. He hit .308 with 17 HR and 21 SB in the minors. He also is hitting .368 with 3 HR in 19 winter league ABs. His glove wasn't good by any stretch of the imagination (but I didn't draft him in my fantasy league's rookie draft for his glove!), but the MLB coaches can help him there.
Posted by: cubs223425 | November 14, 2009 at 12:55 PM
nbbaseball: The thing there is that he throws too many balls. The pitches he throws in the zone are still strikeout pitches. He could still go 5-6 inning in the AL East. His ability in terms of outplaying hitters isn't the issue, it's his command.
Posted by: cubs223425 | November 14, 2009 at 12:58 PM
bradley: .257/.378/.397 -6.9 uzr/150
mags: .310/.376/.428 -5.4 uzr/150
contracts: bradley 2 years 21.5 mil, mags 18 mil in 2010 and another vesting option for 12 mil in 2011
if the cubs were willing to pay mags and the tigers could put up with milton and his attitude the deal would get done because it would save the tigers money and it would get milton out of chicago
Posted by: nbbaseball51 | November 14, 2009 at 01:01 PM
Tradeguy Gm today that lineup would suck
Trade Rivera for Granderson along with wood and prospects.
Figgins
Abreu
Granderson
Hunter
Guerrero
MORALES
KENDRICK
NAPOLI
AYBAR
Posted by: chris mlb expert | November 14, 2009 at 01:01 PM
Tigers, no offense but do you have any idea what you are talking about? Grandy for Soriano? WHY? Thames was released, Raburn is a utility player, no replacement for Polanco? how about Sizemore
Posted by: allstarlineup | November 14, 2009 at 01:02 PM
Sure Cameron is a better defender. But Damon is a MUCH better hitter than Cameron. He had 30 points higher than him in the average. Is a very good leadoff/2 hitter. Scored 100 runs and hit as many homers. Hes great in the clubhouse and knows how to win. Id take Damon in a 1 year deal. Cameron is a rally killer. Strikes out too much and only hit .230 with RISP miniscule compared to Damon's .299. Thats why Damon is a better option.
Posted by: yankfan1 | November 14, 2009 at 01:03 PM
He isn't ready I want Dan Uggla
Posted by: Tigers | November 14, 2009 at 01:04 PM
If you're gonna back up the truck for a Tiger, make it Verlander, and not Granderson. I don't know why so many people love this guy like he's Eric Davis in his prime.
Posted by: howiehandles | November 14, 2009 at 01:04 PM
We are keeping Verlander . Granderson or Jackson?
Posted by: Tigers | November 14, 2009 at 01:07 PM
allstarlineup you don't know antyhing about the Tigers we have good outfielders .
Posted by: Tigers | November 14, 2009 at 01:10 PM
If the Cubs can get Jacksin and Grandderson for a package of 3 or 4 prospects I'd do that.
When Hendry's done giving Grabow a 2 year $15 mil contract he can focus on giving up every good prospect the Cubs have for Granderson.
Cubs off season plan:
Sign M Byrd
Re-sign Harden for 1 year with 2nd year option
Try to trade Bradley.
Posted by: Lilkenny | November 14, 2009 at 01:11 PM
kan tong: Ok, I meant to answer you sooner on what I would offer, but there were a lot of things I was replying to.
What would I offer? I've pimped this for days...
Jake Fox--30 HR power to replace Granderson's bat. He can DH in DET, but he is also capable of playing LF, RF, 3B, 1B, and C if there is an emergency.
Sam Fuld--Good defensive OF to replace Granderson's glove. Colvin is also an option, though Fuld did hit .299 in limited PT at the MLB level.
Baker/Fontenot/Blanco--I'd like it to be Fontenot in terms of production, but he is the least of the 3. Blanco makes sense because he is a SS. Baker is a totally different animal because I would say put him in the deal, because a 3-way deal trading Bradley to get Luis Castillo becomes feasible (Castillo can lead off and hit is weak singles, then the others behind him will drive him in).
Marshall/Gorzelanny--mlb.com lists DET's top-4 SPs as Verlander, Jackson, Porcello and Bonderman--all righties. Willis is the listed #5, and we know he is a failure. This would give the Tigers a solid lefty starter that is pretty cheap (either one will prolly be under $600K, but IDK how the arbitration and whatever works).
Right-Handed RP--The Cubs have several young, capable righty relievers in Berg, Stevens, Caridad, Guzman (older, but more proven), Patton, Atkins, etc. Lyon and Rodney are FAs for DET, and there's no realistic belief both will return, because some think both want to try being closers.
So it would be a 5-for-1 swap, with the Tigers getting 5 different pieces that can help the big league team in 201. All 5 would combine for maybe $2-4 million total.
Hak Ju Lee is another trade possibility, but I think the Cubs would maybe like to hold on to him in hopes that it will give them a name in the Asian market (like the Pirates with Aki Iwamura).
Also, I think Bradley for Maggs is pretty interesteing. The Cubs would take the big hit this season with Magglio making $18 milliion, but he won't play too much and they could keep his $15 million 2011 option from vesting. Then that money they gave Bradley is gone after 2010, and the Tigers get 2 years of Bradley for only $3 million more than 1 year of Maggs (who would probably have his 2011 option vest in DET, which would make him 2/$33 million).
Posted by: cubs223425 | November 14, 2009 at 01:12 PM
good one Tigers, thats funny.
Posted by: allstarlineup | November 14, 2009 at 01:13 PM
nbbaseball: Cot's says the 2011 option is at $15 million, not $12 million. It vests at 270 starts or 1,080 plate appearances combines for 2009+2010.
http://mlbcontracts.blogspot.com/2005/01/detroit-tigers_21.html
Posted by: cubs223425 | November 14, 2009 at 01:14 PM
Tigers 2010
1 Cf Raburn
2 2b Santigao
3 Rf Ordonez
4 1b Cabera
5 lf Thames
6 DH Thomas
7 3b Inge
8 C Larid
9 ss Everett
Pitching
Verlander
Jackon
Porcello
Harden
Galaragga
Posted by: Tigers | November 14, 2009 at 01:14 PM
yankfan1: Damon played in New Yankee Stadium. His numbers are skewed like hell. Cameron will hit 30 HR easy there.
Posted by: cubs223425 | November 14, 2009 at 01:15 PM
Tigers are looking for a 3B, Josh Vitters or Brandon Wood.
Posted by: stonecipher beadsman | November 14, 2009 at 01:17 PM
Lilkenny: Grabow's getting 2 years and bout half that money. The $7.5 million figure isn't the peryear number, it's the 2 years combined.
Posted by: cubs223425 | November 14, 2009 at 01:17 PM