![]() |
|
|
| |
« Pirates Rumors: Bay, Morris, McLouth, Nady | Main | Twins To Talk Extension With Morneau? »
UPDATE, 12-3-07 at 10am: Peter Gammons says the Marlins are no longer insisting on both Adenhart and Santana. He thinks the deal can work.
FROM 12-2-07 at 2pm:
Jon Heyman has the latest on the Miguel Cabrera situation. As you know, the Angels are frustrated but have left the door open for the Marlins to approach them regarding their offer.
We also knew that the offer had both Howie Kendrick and Jeff Mathis in it. The other players: one of Nick Adenhart or Ervin Santana, plus a "mid-level" pitching prospect. The Marlins wanted both Adenhart and Santana, prompting the Angels to throw up their hands. Marlins ownership (Loria and Samson) are the ones pushing for both pitchers.
The Angels' original offer stands, and they'll wait to see if the Marlins decide to take it. Heyman lists the Angels, Dodgers, Giants, and White Sox as those most serious in Cabrera, with the Rangers, Indians, and Mets also placing calls. The Mets, eh? That's a new one.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e2010534ad9a12970b
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Details On Angels' Cabrera Offer:


|
|
I think its known that the Mets dont have the prospects to land a big-time player right now. Most of their prospects are over hyped anyways.
Posted by: GmblngPtchr20 | December 02, 2007 at 02:04 PM
I guess the expert scout has spoken. What a brilliant factual statement.
Posted by: SkiBolton | December 02, 2007 at 02:14 PM
Mets have been in these talks for some time. The idea would be a move to the outfield.
Posted by: Kosh | December 02, 2007 at 02:15 PM
Except the Mets have no chance for Cabrera, not without offering talent that would be counterproductive to getting him. Which basically means they won't.
Posted by: gogopalehose | December 02, 2007 at 02:18 PM
the Mets aren't knew if you are a Met fan. Omar LOVES Cabrera. The Marlins also love Fernando Martinez and were asking for him in every D-Train trade thats why the Mets never got him. If the Mets were to give F-Mart, Pelfrey, Church, Heilman, and 2 more guys they MIGHT be able to get it done.
On a more realistic note what if the Angels included both pitchers, BUT the Marlins also included D-Train I would do that if I was both teams what do you think?
Posted by: TheWrightStuff | December 02, 2007 at 02:26 PM
i mean new*
Posted by: TheWrightStuff | December 02, 2007 at 02:27 PM
I think the Fish hold on to Dontrelle and see if he rebounds, if not throw him away at the deadline.
Posted by: gogopalehose | December 02, 2007 at 02:32 PM
@WrightStuff:
Problem there is the same problem with most Met trade offers that are thrown out these days. You're only capable of throwing quantity (5, 6, 7 guys) at teams, because the quality of those guys right now isn't that great. Quantity deals don't go over well when you're trying to compete with the kind of quality that the Angels have on the table right now.
I think any big Met acquisition right now has to start with Reyes on the table. But if Omar were willing to do that, he'd be right in the Santana mix.
Posted by: Kosh | December 02, 2007 at 02:32 PM
The twins are looking for a young, stud third baseman. Maybe the Mets feel they are better off trading for Cabrera and flipping him for Santana. How about Pelfrey, Guerra, Gomez, Anderson Hernandez, and another prospect for Cabrera; then Cabrera and Mulvey for Santana. This way they keep Wright and Reyes and still land Santana.
Posted by: C-Gouds' UltimateBaseball | December 02, 2007 at 02:36 PM
That package would never land Cabrera...and the Twins wouldn't want Cabrera.
Posted by: gogopalehose | December 02, 2007 at 02:39 PM
Mets fans still pushing Heilman as a valuable trade chip?
Posted by: Bedrosian's Beard | December 02, 2007 at 02:42 PM
There are a few things you can take away from this: A) Jefrey Loria is a detriment to his team and baseball. He needs to let his baseball people do their work. B) The Twins shouldn't have any interest in Cabrera because he's a defensive liability (especially on turf), he's going to make a ton of money very soon, and he'll be a DH in 3 seasons. They wont pay 15-20m a season for a DH if they won't pay it for Santana. C) The Angels are DESPERATE for offensive help, and I am surprised some other team hasn't jumped in and made an offer for a young slugger (like the Rays).
Posted by: Outdors21 | December 02, 2007 at 02:44 PM
The mets can throw more young quality into a trade than any other team in baseball. Wright and reyes are both signed long term for cheap, Maine still has 4 years prior to free agency. If omar packaged several guys like gomez, pelfrey, mulvey or martinez along with 1 of these guys, their package would beat anything currently being talked about from the angels. Omar is capable of getting anyone he really wants.
Posted by: SkiBolton | December 02, 2007 at 02:46 PM
By the way...It would be stupid to move wright or reyes for fatty...just making the point that the mets have plenty of quality...not just quantity
Posted by: SkiBolton | December 02, 2007 at 02:48 PM
Wow SkiBolton... No it wouldn't. Did you seriously compare the prospects offered by the LA Angels? They are giving them at least two major league already players and a good prospect. Gomez is a good prspect. Pelfrey is major league ready but not like E Santana or their 2nd Baseman. And Mulvey or Martinez is just over hyped...
Posted by: ConservativeTog | December 02, 2007 at 02:53 PM
"On a more realistic note what if the Angels included both pitchers, BUT the Marlins also included D-Train I would do that if I was both teams what do you think?"
Or if not Willis, what about Uggla... who becomes superfluous to the Marlins with Kendrick on board.
Posted by: DrewB | December 02, 2007 at 03:01 PM
Wright alone is probably better than the whole package LA has supposedly offered...espescially since he's signed cheap until 2013. Do you honestly think Kendrick is worth more than a guy like reyes? I didn't compare the "prospects" being talked about...I said anyone who thinks the mets don't have the talent to match a deal like the angels are offering is nuts.
Posted by: SkiBolton | December 02, 2007 at 03:04 PM
Outdoors21.. I think you've got too high an opinion of the Mets farm system. Schneider and Church was all they could get for Milledge?
Posted by: DrewB | December 02, 2007 at 03:04 PM
@SkiBolton
I think they have the quality if, as you are willing to do, they offer Reyes or Wright. Many Met fans would do Reyes for Santana. The problem is that Omar hasn't budged on his unwillingness to trade those two, which leaves us with the usual suspect 4/5 guy packages.
Posted by: Kosh | December 02, 2007 at 03:12 PM
How about Maine, pelfrey, gotay, and gomez? I'd personally take that over the angels offer. All 4 are 0-3 guys, and Maine has proven he can be real good at the ML level. I don't know that omar would do it, but what if florida threw in scott olsen?
Posted by: SkiBolton | December 02, 2007 at 03:26 PM
Angels better not cave.
Marlins can have Kendrick OR a combination of Adenhart and Wood.
To give up Kendrick + Adenhart of Wood is too much.
I don't really see any other great matches right now. Kind of like the Yankees and Twins. Florida will cave, as will Minnesota if the Angels and Yankees stick to their guns.
Posted by: bjsguess | December 02, 2007 at 03:31 PM
@DrewB
Uggla would move to 3rd to fill Cabrera's sizeable hole ;)
Posted by: kyledavidson | December 02, 2007 at 03:31 PM
I like the idea above regarding Uggla. However, it's unclear whether FLA is willing to off-load him. They may want to move him to 3rd and use Kendrick at 2B.
What about Kendrick/Mathis/Santana/Adenhart/Mid-level pitching prospect for Cabrera/Uggla.
The Angels would finally have a sick lineup to surround Vlad and go with their great pitching. Something like...
1. Figgins -- SS
2. Matthews -- LF
3. Vlad -- DH
4. Miggy -- 3B
5. Hunter -- CF
6. Anderson/Rivera -- LF
7. Uggla -- 2B
8. Kotchman -- 1B
9. Napoli -- C
That lineup would actually rival the fire power of NYY and BOS. Maybe not quite there...but close. Dumbass Scoscia will still probably have Miggy involved in hit-and-run bullshit.
Posted by: kbrooks2LA | December 02, 2007 at 03:34 PM
@SkiBolton
Maine is an average pitcher who's had spurts of success with the Mets. Pelfrey is a guy who was highly touted but got grossly exposed at the ML level. Right now, Adenhart has higher value.
Posted by: Kosh | December 02, 2007 at 03:37 PM
No way you bat GMJ 2nd. Kotchman and his .840 OPS and .370+ OBP will bat 2nd if Kendrick is traded.
Figgins
Kotchman
Vlad
Cabrera
Hunter
Rivera
Napoli
Izturis
Matthews
If they were to include Uggla, then Figgins shifts to SS and Uggla takes over SS, leaving Izturis as backup.
Posted by: mlb1 | December 02, 2007 at 03:39 PM
Of course you would take that over the Angels package SkiBolton - you are a Mets fan.
Posted by: bjsguess | December 02, 2007 at 03:39 PM
Oops, I left out Anderson.
Figgins
Kotchman
Vlad
Cabrera
Hunter
Rivera
Anderson
Napoli
Izturis
With Matthews benched. No way would the Angels want to lose Rivera's production for Matthews.
Posted by: mlb1 | December 02, 2007 at 03:40 PM
Uggla takes over 2b*, but I don't see the Marlins including him.
I think it'll come down to Kendrick, Adenhart, Willits and Mathis for Mcab.
Posted by: mlb1 | December 02, 2007 at 03:42 PM
I think that if the Angels were to want Uggla as part of the deal as well, then they would probably have to part with Brandon Wood, considering the Marlins would need someone to take over at 3B. It'd probably be something like
Angels get: Cabrera and Uggla
Marlins get: Kendrick, Mathis, Adenhart, Willits, Wood
Then instead of playing Uggla at third base, the Marlins would have Wood to play third, which they would probably prefer longterm anyways if he can cut down on the strikeouts
Posted by: scribbletone | December 02, 2007 at 03:51 PM
That would mean the Angels basically traded Wood for Uggla, just to have him included. That would be a terrible deal for the Angels.
Posted by: mlb1 | December 02, 2007 at 03:54 PM
I'm a little surprised the Diamondbacks don't get in on this. A package of Upton, C. Jackson, Montero, Tracy/Callaspo or Alberto Gonzalez, and maybe Nippert/Eveland answers a lot of questions for both teams. Upton is going to be a stud ballplayer and gives the Marlins an up-and-coming superstar in return for Cabrera, who would move to 1B for Arizona (as he will eventually) and Reynolds takes over 3B. It doesn't supply the pitching component the Angels offer does but Upton is a better ballplayer than any they'd be getting from Anaheim. The Diamondbacks have the young talent to tweak the aforementioned offer, and Arizona NEEDS that big bat in the middle of the order.
Posted by: Devlsh | December 02, 2007 at 03:55 PM
"I'm a little surprised the Diamondbacks don't get in on this."
Thats because Cabrera is gonna be commanding a massive deal when he hits free agency in a couple years, and the Diamondbacks don't have the payroll for a guy like him. They can't afford Miggy, and are better off keepin their young studs anyways.
"That would mean the Angels basically traded Wood for Uggla, just to have him included. That would be a terrible deal for the Angels."
Didn't see it that way, then I guess pull Willits from the deal and make it a 2 for 4 deal of Kendrick, Mathis, Adenhart and Wood for Cabrera and Uggla.
Posted by: scribbletone | December 02, 2007 at 04:12 PM
I'd be fine with Kendrick, Adenhart, Mathis and Willits for Cabrera, but to include Wood in place of Willits just for Uggla wouldn't be a good move on the Angels part.
Posted by: mlb1 | December 02, 2007 at 04:19 PM
For all you HOWIE KENDRICK lovers out there (you know who you are)
2006-2007 OPS
Kendrick -- .767
Izturis -- .765
But for some reason one guy is just a utility player while the other guy is the second coming of Tony Gwynn.
Posted by: kbrooks2LA | December 02, 2007 at 04:19 PM
If the Marlins won't take a "Kendrick, Mathis, Adenhart and a mid level prospect" for Cabrera, why would they take a Kendrick, Mathis, Adenhart and Wood for BOTH Cabrera and Uggla? The addition of Wood in lieu of a mid-level prospect costs them Uggla too? Don't think so.
As for the Diamondbacks not being able to afford Cabrera, well, they're paying Randy Johnson a pretty penny and he'll be off the books before long; Cabrera is a much better investment.
Posted by: Devlsh | December 02, 2007 at 04:20 PM
"I'm a little surprised the Diamondbacks don't get in on this."
Thats because Cabrera is gonna be commanding a massive deal when he hits free agency in a couple years, and the Diamondbacks don't have the payroll for a guy like him. They can't afford Miggy, and are better off keepin their young studs anyways. --
Exactly. Cabrera is the exact wrong way for the Dbacks to spend their prospects.
They can barely afford him now and have no possibility of extending him.
I don't buy the "big bat" theory either. Chris Young hit 32 bombs in his rookie year this year and once the other young'ns develop there will be plenty of stick to go around.
The DBacks need to find a solid starting pitcher without breaking the bank and then sit the rest of the offseason out.
Peronally I'd try to land Capuano for Valverde and then just wait for Spring Training.
Posted by: tmar | December 02, 2007 at 04:22 PM
Easy to look at numbers alone without knowing anything else. [including injuries]
Here...let me break it down.
Kendrick had a short 27 AB stint when he was 23 (2006), and he was pressing too hard. He only had 3 hits in 27 ABs. He was sent down. He was recalled later on, and hit around .310 since then that season. So, his first season numbers are skewed because of his short 27 AB stint. Either way, what he did after was impressive for someone that was 23.
Second, Kendrick suffered broken bones in his hand and still managed to hit over .320 for the year in 2007. How many players, who end up with broken bones in their hand, after getting hit not once, but TWICE in the same spot, manage to have that kind of season?
If you remove May, which was the month he returned from his hand injury, he hit over .340 for the season. He hit over .350 since the ASB, which are in line with his minor league numbers.
Look at this:
Kendrick in April: .327/.365/.490
He then got hit in the hand that month and went down with broken bones.
May: .152/.200/.242
This is the month he returned from his hand injury, and he was rusty, understandably.
June: .333/.350/.475
July: .286 batting average in 4 games played, since he got hit in the hand again.
August: .395/.435/.488
September: .340/.353/.470
Posted by: mlb1 | December 02, 2007 at 04:24 PM
don't think i am lame for this..but Tim..the ads on the page "Paris Hilton Loses Her Top" and now the one I see with some chick with her boyshorts all the way up her ass-crack...sooo inappropriate for work. I work in a populated office, and often check from my cubicle with peoples walking behind me.
Believe me, yer advertisers make me WANT to click the link, but the still photos they are supplying to intrigue interest...while intriguing interest...VERY inappropriate for work.
Posted by: bobhamelin | December 02, 2007 at 04:25 PM
As you can see there, the month of May brought down his numbers by a lot. That's the same month he returned from having broken bones in his hand.
The guy was injured and still hit over .320 for the season and an .800 OPS.
He was also *23* for the majority of the season!
Posted by: mlb1 | December 02, 2007 at 04:27 PM
Actually, Kendrick was 22 in 2006 for the majority of the year.
How many 22-year-olds hit around .310 ever since their recall from a short 27 AB stint?
Kendrick is a special talent.
Posted by: mlb1 | December 02, 2007 at 04:28 PM
This is unreal, I was arguing about Howie Kendrick with that LABrooks guy a couple days ago and he was making the same argument. How can you not see the talent in this guy? When everyone else is listing a million reasons why this guy is special, and all you can bring up is his OPS from his age 22 season, then you're probably wrong
Posted by: scribbletone | December 02, 2007 at 04:34 PM
The Diamondbacks hit .250/.321/.413 as a team last season and scored more runs than just two other teams. Yes, they're young and improving Cabrera is a difference maker in the middle of that order. tmar, Young posted a .762 OPS; compare that to a .966 for Cabrera.
Posted by: Devlsh | December 02, 2007 at 04:37 PM
I'm not saying the DBacks wouldn't love to have Cabrera, just that they can't afford him.
It would take several of our starting players to get him and his salary would leave us unable to fill any of our pitching depth.
After Webb and Davis our pitching is a huge question mark.
Bottom line is that we don't have the money to improve on both pitching and offense and our prospects on offense are far better than our pitching prospects.
Posted by: tmar | December 02, 2007 at 05:23 PM
This whole thing is a joke.
The Marlins really have no choice but to eventually take whatever the Angels are offering. Why? BECAUSE NO OTHER TEAM IS INTERESTED!!! The Dodgers haven't shown any interest whatsoever in giving up guys like Kemp, Billingsley, Kershaw, Loney, or LaRoche for Cabrera. The White Sox want him bad, but their offer has up to this point not come close to that of the Angels. Brian Sabean won't give up Cain or Lincecum for him, so the Giants are out. And the Mets? Please don't make me laugh.
So you see, the Marlins don't have a legit second team to play against the Angels. That being the case, I expect the Angels to stand on their offer and tell the Marlins to take it or leave it, knowing damn well they have no choice but to take it.
Posted by: tolo316 | December 02, 2007 at 05:39 PM
Personally I find Mathis, Kendrick, Adenhart/Santana, and mid level prospect unacceptable for the Marlins.
Acceptable IMO would be:
Willits, Santana, Kendrick, Adenhart
Kendrick, Adenhart, Wood, mid level prospect
or lets add Uggla
Cabrera, Uggla for Wood, Adenhart, Kendrick, Willits, mid-level prospect/Morales/Mathis
If neither of those options is possible I think the Marlins should hold on to Cabrera. Then call teams again close to the trade deadline and see whats up....
Posted by: Cubangm | December 02, 2007 at 05:52 PM
No, the Marlins can sit for a year. Cabrera is under contract for two more years. They'll just do this again next winter - and pay Cabrera the extra 4 million he'll be due this year.
Posted by: ajkreider | December 02, 2007 at 05:54 PM
Keep dreaming.
Posted by: mlb1 | December 02, 2007 at 05:56 PM
Problem is, the longer they wait, the less leverage they have. Waiting it out and then trading him means he's that much closer to free agency. You simply don't trade what you're offering now for a one year rental.
Posted by: mlb1 | December 02, 2007 at 05:57 PM
Miguel Cabrera is under control for 2 more years! The Marlins don't have to give him up! This is what I see the Angels giving up. Trading Chone Figgins to the Braves for some porspects like Jo-Jo Reyes, Chuck James, Jason Heyword, Jordan Schfaer. Obviously Figgins wouldn't bring in all 4 but maybe 2. Then flip around those prospects for Miguel.
Angels get:
Miguel Cabrera
Dan Uggla
Marlins get:
Jason Heyward/Jordan Schfaer
Jeff Mathis
Howie Kendrick
Nick Adenhart
JoJo/Chuck James
Posted by: Barroid_Bonds | December 02, 2007 at 05:58 PM
Figgins isn't going anywhere, and we don't need or want Uggla.
Posted by: mlb1 | December 02, 2007 at 05:59 PM
The problem for the Marlins in waiting is that all of the deep pockets/ prospect loaded teams had a potential need for a 3B this year. A-Rod and Lowell going back to their original teams, and Frank McCourt doesn't have the bank account or the good sense to pull this off. Only the Angels remain.
And much of Cabrera's trade value is tied to the fact that he has 2 more years under team control. The closer he gets to being a free-agent, the less value he has.
I suspect the Marlins & Angels will work things out this week.
Posted by: DrewB | December 02, 2007 at 06:02 PM
Who are Jason Heyward/Jordan Schfaer
JoJo/Chuck James ?
Do you mean Jordan Walden?
Posted by: DrewB | December 02, 2007 at 06:04 PM
Jason Heyward/Jordan Schfaer
JoJo/Chuck James are some of the Braves top prospects. The Angels have Erick Aybar and Brandon Wood for their SS position. Figgins would not play at SS. Uggla fills in the 2B hole when you trade Kendrick. Figgins starts in CF for the Braves.
Posted by: Barroid_Bonds | December 02, 2007 at 06:07 PM
Figgins plays 2B if Kendrick goes for Cabrera. That's his best defensive position.
Posted by: mlb1 | December 02, 2007 at 06:08 PM
Your not going to have Figgins if you get Cabrera. Trade him to the Braves for prospects. That way your not giving up all your prospects. Plus you get Uggla who hits 30+HRS a year.
Posted by: Barroid_Bonds | December 02, 2007 at 06:11 PM
"Problem is, the longer they wait, the less leverage they have. Waiting it out and then trading him means he's that much closer to free agency. You simply don't trade what you're offering now for a one year rental."
I don't consider E.Santana/Adenhart, Kendrick, Mathis, Mid level prospect that valuable. Sorry.
Mathis = has bust written all over him, plus if he puts up another year like he has his last 2 I wouldn't be surprised if he is DFA
Santana/Adenhart - Santana I feel is going to rebound and at least become a #3 or #4 starter. Adenhart who knows? I like him long term but he was far from dominating at AA this past season
Kendrick- solid player. I don't think he is the next Tony Gywnn though.
Mid Level pitching prospect - Im going to say its a Sean O'Sullivan type. I actually prefer a mid level pitching prospect at this point over Mathis.
Again I rather wait it out, because that is not a suffient return for a player of Miguel Cabrera caliber. With that said I can easily see the Marlins trading him for that package.
Posted by: Cubangm | December 02, 2007 at 06:13 PM
How are we not going to have him?
If the Angels trade Kendrick, Adenhart or Santana, Mathis and Willits for Cabrera, that leaves Figgins at 2B, since he can't play 3B anymore.
The only players I'd hurt to see go are Kendrick and Adenhart. Mathis is our backup catcher to a much more talented offensive catcher and Willits is a 4th OF on our team, but he could start for many other teams. He's an OBP machine, although he has zero power.
Posted by: mlb1 | December 02, 2007 at 06:15 PM
You might not consider them valuable, but people who understand those players (specifically Kendrick and Adenhart) do.
Santana's problem is mental. He's dominant at home, while garbage on the road. That's a mental problem and since he's 24, he could fix it.
Posted by: mlb1 | December 02, 2007 at 06:18 PM
The Marlins have turned down that offer. You need to trade Figgins to upgrade your prospects. Thats how your not going to have him. Either your going to give up exactly what the Marlins want (Adenhart,Santana,Kendrick,Jeff Mathis)or your going to trade Figgins for prospects then trade them
Posted by: Barroid_Bonds | December 02, 2007 at 06:19 PM
Anyone check out that SI article that's linked? I knew it all along! Someone with a name like Howie Kendrick HAS to be white! It looks like he's batting left handed now too.
Posted by: Chillin | December 02, 2007 at 06:20 PM
The Angels don't have to give in, and they won't.
The Marlins also accepted that offer but tried to get more at the last second, according to Arte Moreno. That means they're trying to see if they could get more.
If not, they either A) Hold on to him or B) Accept that package.
If they hold on to him, then they could expect to get even less later on. A player one year away from free agency won't net you the same package as a player that's two years away.
Posted by: mlb1 | December 02, 2007 at 06:22 PM
Who says the Marlins want the Braves prospects anyway? Your essential 3way trade proposal doesn't make much sense.
Posted by: Chillin | December 02, 2007 at 06:23 PM
What exactly is Johan Santana going to be getting in return? The Marlins are not going to accept the package. Miguel Cabrera is top 3 hitter in baseball. What are any of those players? Prospects? They might not even turn out to be great like Cabrera.
Posted by: Barroid_Bonds | December 02, 2007 at 06:24 PM
I'm willing to bet that Cabrera will be traded to the Angels for Kendrick, Adenhart or Santana (probably Adenhart), Mathis and Willits.
No other team is willing to go that high, and if they were, they'd do it by now, or will during the meetings.
A player two years away from free agency could get you a much bigger package than a player that's one year away. The Marlins know that, and are just hoping to see if the Angels will give in or if anyone else will offer more than what the Angels are.
We'll see, but I think he'll get traded to the Angels.
Posted by: mlb1 | December 02, 2007 at 06:24 PM
Have you looked up Jason Heyward or Jordan Schfear?
Posted by: Barroid_Bonds | December 02, 2007 at 06:25 PM
The Dodgers could easily beat that package by offering Kemp,Kershaw,LaRoche,Meloan/Elbert
Posted by: Barroid_Bonds | December 02, 2007 at 06:28 PM
Yes, but they won't, lol.
Posted by: mlb1 | December 02, 2007 at 06:29 PM
Actually they will I think. The Marlins are asking for Loney or Broxton to be the 4th player, but they will come down to Meloan/Elbert. Elbert even with an arm injury last year is on the top 50 prospects list. Kershaw is #4 on that list in front of guys named Joba Chamberlain, Jacoby Ellsbury, Clay Buchholz, and LaRoche is in the top 50 too. Kemp isn't even considered a prospect anymore.
Posted by: Barroid_Bonds | December 02, 2007 at 06:35 PM
"You might not consider them valuable, but people who understand those players (specifically Kendrick and Adenhart) do.
Santana's problem is mental. He's dominant at home, while garbage on the road. That's a mental problem and since he's 24, he could fix it."
Not saying that they are not valuable because they are. Its the way that they are package in the deal that is no so valuable.
If the deal included those 3 together(Santan, Adenhart,Kendrick) as you mention above + a Willits then thats a good and fair deal. But it doesn't. Instead its:
"Mathis is our backup catcher to a much more talented offensive catcher"
+ a mid level prospect
Posted by: Cubangm | December 02, 2007 at 06:35 PM
"The Dodgers could easily beat that package by offering Kemp,Kershaw,LaRoche,Meloan/Elbert"
They don't even have to offer that much to top the rumored Angels deal.
I would much rather have Kershaw, Laroche, Eithier, and a Meloan/Elbert/McDonald over Kendrick, Santana/Adenhart, Mid level prospect and Mathis
Heck if the Dodgers offer us just Kemp, Laroche, Kershaw I would take that over what the Angels are offering
Posted by: Cubangm | December 02, 2007 at 06:41 PM
Howie Kendrick can't even spell W-A-L-K
Well his OBP and OPS are barely league average...but he's a "special talent" right?
He's special when compared to the average person playing baseball. Not major league players...just the average guy swinging a bat down at family fun center. However, when compared to MLB players he is the antithesis of "special." He's not especially good or bad. He's exceedingly average!!!
Posted by: kbrooks2LA | December 02, 2007 at 06:43 PM
"I'm willing to bet that Cabrera will be traded to the Angels for Kendrick, Adenhart or Santana (probably Adenhart), Mathis and Willits.
No other team is willing to go that high, and if they were, they'd do it by now, or will during the meetings.
A player two years away from free agency could get you a much bigger package than a player that's one year away. The Marlins know that, and are just hoping to see if the Angels will give in or if anyone else will offer more than what the Angels are.
We'll see, but I think he'll get traded to the Angels."
Unfortunately I believe you will be right. If no team caves in during the winter meetings the Marlins will settle for Willits, Kendrick, Adenhart, Mathis
Posted by: Cubangm | December 02, 2007 at 06:44 PM
I would trade Kendrick, Adenhart, Wilits, and Mathis. Talk about a good deal for both teams. And mlb1 batting Matthews second makes him better. If you were an Angels fan you would know that Matthews batted above .300 while he batted lead off. Once Figgins, Wilits got hot and Garret Anderson got hurt he was moved down to 5th and 6th. Having him up in the order is good. Kotchman grounds to many balls to second and first it is all he does sometimes.
Posted by: angels fan | December 02, 2007 at 06:57 PM
ahahha...every thread I go in has kbrooks bashing on Kendrick. Then I bet mlb1 is going to respond with the usual... ".320 batting average as a 23 y.o. and he was injured!"
Posted by: Chillin | December 02, 2007 at 06:57 PM
kbrooks. Average players don't hit .320 in their rookie season or in any season. Average players hit .280 or something lower like a Jay Payton or somebody like that. I know he doesn't walk but which Angel does. And Mike Napoli and Reggie Wilits are the only Angels who do that and they are not that good.
Posted by: angels fan | December 02, 2007 at 07:02 PM
hmmm...close enough.
Posted by: Chillin | December 02, 2007 at 07:05 PM
Hah, it's not really worth making a new reply again, so I'll just copy and paste what I wrote previously.
Posted by: mlb1 | December 02, 2007 at 07:05 PM