![]() |
|
|
| |
« Cristian Guzman To Wait On Contract Talks | Main | Several Giants Relievers Available »
Any decent center fielders out there for trade? It's a thin market; let's explore.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e200e552908b1a8833
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The Center Fielder Market:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
I think Randy Winn might be a useful addition to this list.
He plays an OK center field defensively, can hit at the top or bottom of a lineup and only has 1 year remaining after this one.
Giants would probaly move him for very little to allow Schierholtz the opportunity to play RF.
Posted by: aGIANTfan | May 30, 2008 at 10:01 AM
What about Kenny Lofton? I suppose he'd no longer have the range to play center, but his 105 OPS+ last season might tempt a team to give him a shot.
Posted by: IowaCubs | May 30, 2008 at 10:14 AM
Tim, are you planning on doing future pieces on mid-season needs for each team? If not, could you add a list of teams to each of these posts that may be in need of that position? It doesn't necessarily need to be a "who trades what for whom" post, maybe just a list of teams that need the position.
Posted by: WhiteSoxFan | May 30, 2008 at 10:30 AM
I remain baffled that Willy Taveras continues to draw a major league paycheck. He's a two-dimensional player -- he can bunt and run. He has no power, no plate discipline and is not a particularly great OF either.
Management remains dazzled by his speed but there are two players on the roster who are clearly superior -- Sullivan and Spilbourghs -- and why the Rox haven't made Willy some other team's problem remains a mystery.
Posted by: ink-stained scribe | May 30, 2008 at 10:30 AM
Yeah Randy Winn should be an option here. Even though he plays right for the Giants he could play center easy. Over his career he's played more center then any other outfield position. 660 games in center, 368 games in left, 326 games in right.
Also according to the Bill James handbook from 2005-2007 Winn has played the 3rd best RF in MLB. Currently Winn is batting .295/.346/.453.
Posted by: kdub | May 30, 2008 at 11:02 AM
I think DeJesus is the best fit for the Cubs...
Posted by: jrfukudome | May 30, 2008 at 11:02 AM
This is probably nitpicking but Brandon Moss and Bobby Kielty aren't on rehab assignments; Moss was optioned back to Pawtucket on Sunday and Kielty opted to play for Lancaster where he'd be closer to home.
Posted by: TNS | May 30, 2008 at 11:14 AM
TNS: When did Kielty head to Lancaster? Somehow i missed that move. Seems really strange, him in high A, even if he does find it more comfortable.
Posted by: gfulla | May 30, 2008 at 11:37 AM
You could also add Jeremy Reed from the Mariners to this list. He's played some solid centerfield defense in the majors, was hitting .349/.413/.557 at AAA before being called up to the big club. He's only hit .200/.250/.200 in 15 ABs since being recalled. The M's could use some pitching prospects to rebuild their farm after the Bedard trade and they didn't really think they would have room for Reed prior to the season. Even though he's been recalled, he's probably not in the teams long term plans.
Posted by: taharms | May 30, 2008 at 11:40 AM
Somethins gotta give with Three Little Indians…
…Choo and Gutierrez are out of options, the team wants Francisco in the majors ~ one almost has to be dealt no matter what, and if the team brings in a corner-type its possible that 2 could be packing their bags…
Oh, and the Angels might still be hoping to rid themselves of the Mathews contract as well…
Posted by: darkstar1661 | May 30, 2008 at 11:57 AM
Mets need to find out how bad the Reds want to be rid of Freel, because he would be an ideal fit- give him 2 starts a week at 2B, plus one or two elsewhere, depending on who is healthy- if he can handle first base I'd create the wackiest platoon ever.
Posted by: jakec | May 30, 2008 at 12:29 PM
Willy Taveras continues to draw a major league paycheck. He's a two-dimensional player -- he can bunt and run.
I'm sure some GMS noticed, the Red Sox won a World Series in 2004 for trading for such a player and using him for pinch running purposes.
Posted by: jg | May 30, 2008 at 01:33 PM
jg,
Problem is, the Rockies have Willy T. in the leadoff spot every day, not as a pinch runner. He's a disaster in that role.
Posted by: ink-stained scribe | May 30, 2008 at 02:03 PM
Reggie Willits?
Posted by: tdischino | May 30, 2008 at 02:29 PM
Not much difference than what went on with Pods…
…Man, the Rockies are repeat offenders, arent they… You would think the “once bitten, twice shy” rule would apply, but…
Posted by: darkstar1661 | May 30, 2008 at 02:44 PM
What about Kenny Lofton? I suppose he'd no longer have the range to play center,
The guy stole 23 bases and hit 6 triples last year. He still has the range to play center. Where in the world do people get the idea that Lofton, a guy with 4 Gold Gloves and 8 assists last year, can't play defense.
"Reggie Willits?"
Intriguing, because he has the range and instincts to play center, the arm to play right and has played a lot of left in the majors. The Angels just don't seem to want to trade him.
I wonder if anyone has interest in Terry Evans. 5 tool guy and can play center.
"Oh, and the Angels might still be hoping to rid themselves of the Mathews contract as well…"
The Angels seem oddly content with Matthews. He is a game-changing defensive player and has a knack for driving in runs, even if his BA has sucked this year. Plus, that is a huge chunk of change.
That does make me wonder though. What about the Angels and Dodgers trading expensive 5 year deals that fit their teams better. Pierre for Matthews. Dodgers get more power, Angels get a speed guy.
Posted by: AA | May 30, 2008 at 05:10 PM
“The Angels seem oddly content with Matthews”
…Yeah I know, it can sometimes seem that way. I just wonder how much of it is PR and attempted saving face. We sure did hear his name quite a bit from out-of-state sources as being shopped earlier though, adding to the confusion.
I don’t think the Dodgers would honestly think about Matthews for Pierre for long though… Sure he provides a bit more power, but he comes at a higher cost and who knows what you get production wise as a whole… Once Jones is back, that could be two such players in the lineup ~ and Pierre seems to be doing ok with the sporadic playing time where we don’t really know how Matthews would handle it…
Posted by: darkstar1661 | May 30, 2008 at 06:37 PM
"…Yeah I know, it can sometimes seem that way. I just wonder how much of it is PR and attempted saving face. We sure did hear his name quite a bit from out-of-state sources as being shopped earlier though, adding to the confusion."
Whatever it is, the Angels do a damn good job keeping quiet any turmoil there might be. It does seem, however, the Matthews has been involved in a lot of big plays this year, which probably does help his value a bit over the sheer numbers. Remember that last year, before he started hiding his injuries, Matthews was playing really well on both ends of the ball and with all 5 tools. The Angels still seem sold on his talent, and not ready to give up on him, as all the trade talk seemed to die down as the year has gone on.
"I don’t think the Dodgers would honestly think about Matthews for Pierre for long though… Sure he provides a bit more power, but he comes at a higher cost and who knows what you get production wise as a whole… Once Jones is back, that could be two such players in the lineup ~ and Pierre seems to be doing ok with the sporadic playing time where we don’t really know how Matthews would handle it…"
Matthews has handled his situation this year pretty well. He hasn't hit that well, but has come up with the big hits, as mentioned before, and that is a good indicator. Still, it is not like they could rotate him at the DH.
As for the price, it isn't a huge difference in baseball terms. Just over $1 million a year.
I do find the whole Pierre/Jones dynamic interesting. Pierre has played like a real lead off hitter in Furcal's absence, taking a ton more pitches than he did before, and is on pace for something like 70 steals. Kemp is playing better defense in center at this point and Ethier does nothing but hit .300 with power and play excellent defense. I wonder if they have Jones play out the year and then just eat the money or perhaps even try to collect an insurance policy on him if his injuries prove as bad as his swing.
Posted by: AA | May 31, 2008 at 02:45 AM
“Still, it is not like they could rotate him at the DH.”
…That’s the part I was referring to. Not so sure the Dodgers would keep him in the lineup (over Ethier or Kemp) if he started slumping.
“As for the price, it isn't a huge difference in baseball terms. Just over $1 million a year. “
…Yeah, guess youre right ~ was thinking the Pierre deal was more heavily frontloaded then it is (knew it had the dramatic drop at end, thought it was a two year event though). As it stands, it would actually be even in 09, +1 Mil 2010 and +3.5M 2011…
…Still don’t see the Dodgers being interested though.
Posted by: darkstar1661 | June 01, 2008 at 02:00 PM