![]() |
|
|
| |
« Holliday Trade Unlikely | Main | Indians Shifting Into Sell Mode »
We've read conflicting reports on Omar Minaya's job security. Adam Rubin believes he's on the hot seat. What's more, Rubin's sources say VP Tony Bernazard might be next in line. Bernazard seems to have a bad reputation, but no one is sure exactly why. Another candidate to replace Minaya might be Wayne Krivsky, who will join the Mets as a scout (hat tip to MetsBlog).
Rubin admits that Minaya "doesn't appear on life support just yet." But a GM without job security can often lead to a short-term approach.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e200e553632ed38833
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Bernazard Next In Line For Mets GM Job?:


|
|
Dear God, please no.
Posted by: icedrake523 | June 20, 2008 at 10:35 AM
ha, this is just trying to sell newspapers. The Wilpons love Minaya. He doesn't even cite any 'sources', it's just complete speculation on his part.
Posted by: AdropOFvenom | June 20, 2008 at 10:38 AM
Doom doom da-doom, do-da-do-da doom da-doom…
Posted by: darkstar1661 | June 20, 2008 at 11:13 AM
Tony Bernazard? Wayne Krivsky? Take it back, man. Take it all back,
Posted by: John Peterson | June 20, 2008 at 02:36 PM
I'm not sure what the article was referring to (or if it's just trolling)...but I remember back when the Mets were courting Carlos Delgado in free agency, Bernazard basically ruined that deal by insulting Delgado.
Posted by: DeepCerulean | June 20, 2008 at 03:02 PM
"ha, this is just trying to sell newspapers. The Wilpons love Minaya. He doesn't even cite any 'sources', it's just complete speculation on his part."
Exactly. This is nonsense. Minaya isn't going anywhere. The Wilpons do love him, and they recognize that almost every player has performed under their career averages. It also doesn't help that both of their corner outfielders have missed significant time.
If they finish they season playing below .500 baseball, Minaya could go during the winter, but I still find it unlikely.
Bernazard has been tlked about negatively for the last 2 or 3 years. He constantly underminded Willie in the clubhouse, and he supposedly was even gloating when Willie got the axe. Besides, the Mets are 5 games out of first place, and the season isn't half way over yet.
Dark, I think it is interesting that with the Indians you chalk their horrible start up to injuries and guys like Pronk and V-Mart not producing and say it is very likely these guys will bounce back and make a run. What is different about the Mets? So far ever single player besides Reyes has not reached their expectations, and the Mets have yet to be completely healthy all season.
Posted by: nrmax88 | June 20, 2008 at 04:03 PM
I think Adam Rubin and Baseball Guru have the same sources, for what thats worth.
Posted by: nrmax88 | June 20, 2008 at 04:11 PM
Also worth noting is that the Mets have made 3 west coast trips in 6 weeks, and now start the much easier part of their schedule and some head to head games against Philly. Santana, Wright, Maine, Heilman, Sanchez, pretty much everybody has not
Posted by: nrmax88 | June 20, 2008 at 04:23 PM
Ok, I guess typekey just deleted 3/4 of my post. Cool. Anyway, all those guys haven't been up to par, Pedro is finally healthy, Santana is a second half pitcher, Wright will eventually heat up etc. Philly has been great but they will come back down a bit once Eaton, Moyer and Kendrick remember that they aren't good, and although the Philly pen has been unreal, it seems unrealistic to expect that to go on all year. This is not a lost season yet by any means.
Posted by: nrmax88 | June 20, 2008 at 04:25 PM
nr, you're dead on. Eaton in particular will come crashing back to Earth. Moyer just might be a tad better than last year, but if he is, he might be back next year. (Why not?) Myers may come roaring back to Earth, as well, and he's known to prefer the bullpen. If the Phillthies had a starter other than Hamels that could consistently get out of the sixth inning, I'd say that Mets' fans were in trouble.
Kendrick demonstrated that he is human this last week. Why are we to suppose that he'll be any good against the rest of the NL, especially when he's never gone a full season at the MLB level?
The NL East will go to the last week.
Posted by: metssincekindergarten | June 20, 2008 at 04:50 PM
"Dark, I think it is interesting that with the Indians you chalk their horrible start up to injuries and guys like Pronk and V-Mart not producing and say it is very likely these guys will bounce back and make a run. What is different about the Mets? So far ever single player besides Reyes has not reached their expectations, and the Mets have yet to be completely healthy all season."
Sorry, didnt see this earlier...
Anyway, you will never hear me say that the team is bad, argue against it experiencing bad luck, or say they dont have the talent to run away with the division. I have on numerous occasions even defended Delgado and stated he should be kept because of his similar April last year. (while getting tore up for it ~ you know that, we even held that conversation ourselves)
In fact, I cant remember the last time I said a negative about the Mets what so ever ~ other than the attitude which exists in the organization. If you above statement is solely based off the song of doom above, I will point out that it was directed at nothing more than the mention of Tony Bernazard’s name.
When you think about the above, can you understand the confusion your post creates for me?
Posted by: darkstar1661 | June 20, 2008 at 07:20 PM
True, this post was actaully more addressing the post you made a few days ago about there soon being an opening at the Mets GM spot, where Bavasi could possibly be interviewed.
...."Oops, almost forgot to say it ~ Mets fans, better start sayin your prayers…
Willie wasnt the one who should have gone, and if they dont turn it around... Well, I imagine Bavasi will be in for an interview..."
That one. With the way this team was expected to perform, and all the pre-season predictions, I was just wondering how come you though the blame should go on Omar instead of on Willie. It might not be Willie's fault, but in my opinion it certainly is not Omar's fault, and the manager always takes the hit in these situations. Yes, the system is weak, but the only reason Met fans bring up this issue is because of the miserable start from the ML team, otherwise nobody would say a word about the system. Nobody cared in 2006, when the Mets were smoking the rest of the NL, that they had a pretty weak farm system. Also, I think some fans are under the impression that you can build a top tier farm system over night. This is not how it works. Especially when you trade 5 of your best prospects in one winter (the Santana trade people loved from the start, and the Church trade was bashed but now Church is like fan favorite number 1 in Mets world).
He also takes heat for giving out big contracts to veterans, which I also don't feel is true because for one, the only real old guy he signed to to be an everyday guy was Alou, and he got him cheap, its not like he signed him to a 5 year deal. He was a stop gap guy.
Then there are guys like Delgado, who people bash Omar for, but we have to remember that he was under pressure to come in and turn this team around quickly, which he did, and also remember he had no sort of farm system when he got here, so its not like he ruined a good thing. He had enough prospects to get Johan Santana, and I also don't hear any jokers complaining about Milledge anymore. What ever happened to Milledge out producing Church this year everybody? Another GM could come in and build a system too, sure, but Omar can do this also and it is easier to build and maintain your system when you have a good team on the field and you dont have to keep constantly making call ups and trading prospects to fill holes.
If you look at the roster Omar inherited, he did a nice job to have this team competing now. I also believe that now with his core locked in (Beltran, Reyes, Wright, Maine, Pelfrey, Johan, Church) and hopefully near ML ready guys in Havens and Davis making the leap to the bigs by 2010, he will have most of his big league team locked in and can focus more on building a system.
I hear people compare the Mets to the Sox and Yankees and bash Minaya for not having a similar system to these two franchises, because they all have seemingly endless budgets. This is not fair. Give all sorts of credit to Cashman, and especially Theo, for what they have done with their farm systems, because they have both done wonderful jobs, but also remember that they had a while to develop those systems. Epstein has had since 2002 and Cashman i believe since the late 90's. Omar has only been GM since 2005, and most of his time here has had to worry about keeping the ML roster competitive, and giving a backseat to the minor leagues because nobody cares about the minor leagues if you aren't winning. Its like they say, you can't rebuild in NY. You can build a system up once you have a competitive team, but you cant have rebuilding years at the ML level or you will not be able to keep your job.
Anyway, Dark, most of this is not directed at you just at the mets fanbase in general, but my prediction is in 6 weeks, the Mets will be playing much better ball (for all this madness going about, they are only 4.5 out of first) their pitching staff will hopefully have hit their stride, and Church and Alou (possibly) will be contributing again. Then all this fire Minaya talk will be finished. Sorry for the Guru-esque rant.
Posted by: nrmax88 | June 21, 2008 at 02:55 AM
Nrmax,
Nah, the “start saying your prayers” thing was said as a precautionary thing with regard to Bavasi most likely getting another job sometime before too long (it was not the only team which I mentioned either). The Mets just happen to be one of those teams which have internal conflict in progress, a situation which can often lead to more moves if a change isnt seen. Now, I’m not even sure it is Omars fault, and didn’t say that either; but I am fairly confident it wasn’t Willies. It seems he was set up to take the fall, as if he was hogtied between a rock and a hard place. But someone wanted him out, and he was cut because of that. If it doesn’t solve the problem, who’s to say the team doesn’t continue to look for the next someone they can blame and make a change with? Only logical that a team with a fairly negative internal attitude could be seeing some more changes on the horizon if everything continues without change, ya know… Team possibly experiencing more changes if things don’t turn around + Bavasi most likely ending up with another job somewhere = Mets fans better say prayers requesting that Omar isnt fired and Bavasi brought in. That’s all I was saying…
Oh, and I wasn’t even saying things cant change, just that they might not ~ it wouldn’t be the first time a team with all the potential in the world was one of the worst clubs you could find. Infact, wouldn’t the Mets from 1992 be one of those such teams? (I think it was 92 where the Mets and Dodgers tanked despite the ability to excel)
But I see you mentioned it wasn’t directed at me as much and rather a letting off of steam. I understand that, its cool with me ~ vent away man, everyone needs to sometimes. Just try to realize I specifically wasn’t bashing your team; Dads a Mets fan, I would be bashing them to him if I felt so inclined… :)
Posted by: darkstar1661 | June 21, 2008 at 08:38 AM
Yeah for sure.. most of that was just a long rant to blow off some steam is right. Atleast they have Krivsky in house in case Minaya does go down. Bernazard seems like the root of their problems. I always liked Krivsky and thought he got an unfair rep because of the one bad deal he made with Lopez and Kearns (which isn't even that bad because Lopez and Kearns really haven't done jack), but he built up a solid young system in Cinci and I like having him on board.
Posted by: nrmax88 | June 21, 2008 at 03:23 PM