![]() |
|
|
| |
« Mariners Acquire Craig Wilson | Main | Jays Scouting Dodgers' A Ball Team »
Not that the Mets were counting on him, but it looks like Moises Alou's body has broken down beyond repair. He's torn a hamstring, and doctors are recommending surgery. It might be time to hang 'em up. Alou's had a fine career, banging out 332 home runs. He topped a .900 OPS in many seasons.
Taking Alou of the picture entirely might cause Omar Minaya to hasten his search for a corner outfielder. The market offers names like Jason Bay, Matt Holliday, Adam Dunn, Raul Ibanez, Frank Catalanotto, Kenny Lofton, Xavier Nady, Randy Winn, and Ken Griffey Jr.
Mets top prospect Fernando Martinez, 19, is hitting .298/.336/.428 in 50 games at Double A (he missed some time with a strained hamstring).
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e200e55394cca58833
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Alou Out For Season, Could Retire:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
Bay, Holliday, Dunn, Ibanez, and Nady are the only names worth mentioning. Seems the only one that could had for cheap is Ibanez. Pirates want the moon for Nady, who knows what they want for Bay. Dunn might not cost much but I don't think the Reds will give him away.
I rather see them promote Fernando Martinez or Mike Carp first. They might produce and could at least take some leverage away from other teams in trying to get a full time replacement.
Posted by: icedrake523 | July 10, 2008 at 10:03 PM
I sure hope he put enough money away in his requirement fund.
:)
Posted by: PhilsPhan | July 10, 2008 at 10:05 PM
Pirates aren't making Bay available, and if they did, you could bet they'd ask for more than they would for Nady.
I see the Rays being in the best position to go after Nady (as in they have prospects they can trade, unlike the Mets, whose system is dried up save for F-Mart).
Posted by: CJax33 | July 10, 2008 at 10:18 PM
Barry Bonds, Barry Bonds
Posted by: yankees2727 | July 10, 2008 at 10:30 PM
Alou could require or could retire? I wonder if he starts washing his hands after goin' 'pee-pee' when he retires.
Posted by: studio179 | July 11, 2008 at 12:23 AM
I'm not a Bond fan, but if there's a team that needs him, Id say its the Mets.
Posted by: start_wearing_purple | July 11, 2008 at 12:57 AM
I'm not a Bond fan, but if there's a team that needs him, Id say its the Mets.
Posted by: start_wearing_purple | July 11, 2008 at 12:58 AM
WTF!!! Alou is out and the Mets still won't sign Bonds? You have got to be kidding me. They'd rather have Fernando Tatis than Barry? The only player that would be worth getting is Matt Holliday, but the Mets would have to trade their fair share for a player of that caliber. Barry's a free agent, he's cheap, and he wants to play. For Christ's sake...come on!!!
Posted by: fenderfanatic | July 11, 2008 at 01:39 AM
Matt Holliday = No. Only chance they have is if they trade Nando, and Holliday will put up a .280/.360/.460is line in NY. Only to walk in a year. No thank you. Good luck to whoever gives that guy a big deal.
Jason Bay- Sure, as long as Fernando doesn't have to be involved, I see whats going on if I am Omar. Don't know if it is possible, but maybe.
Nady- Good player, Met fans need to just let go. All they have done for 2 years is moan and groan about losing Nady as if he were A-Rod. I will take him back, but he is a role player, an improving role player, but still is not worth what Huntington will want. I don't trust his numbers just yet, but his numbers will indicate what his price tag will be. I dont think those 2 match.
Dunn- Very interesting, if he can be had for cheap I go for it. Again, as long as Fernando isn't involved I atleast see whats what. Evaluate him, offer him a contract/ let him walk, either way is fine by me.
Ibanez- Probably the most likely solution. Will definitely not require any all world prospects. Can help out in the 6/7 spots for the rest of the year.
I completely disagree with Icedrake that those guys are the only worth inquiring on. What is wrong with Randy Winn? Brian Giles? These guys would be fantastic number 2 hitters in this lineup.
Ny fans have this state of mind that every single player has to be a star, or else there is no reason to go after them and there is no way it can possibly help the team. Brian Giles may not be what he once was, but he draws walks, put it in play and has a high OBP. Pretty nice glove also. Winn, again, while 34, would cost almost nothing, not require a big commitment, and could help out by switch hitting, adding some speed up top, and being able to play all 3 outfield positions. The idea that these guys could not help is just outrageous.
Fender, um, relax buddy. Alou has been hurt for a day. You have to discuss these things internally. Besides, I think it is more Wilpons decision then Omars. I think if this were solely an on the field move, it would be done. Another thing, the Mets have a bunch of self righteous, idiotic, bonehead fans that act as if they will burn down Shea if Barry is signed. I dont know why they do this, but I think they just want to sound cool on the radio. "I don't want the best hitter in the league, I am a fan of the game and I won't stoop that low.." they say impressively. It is absurd. Between the general idea that only Matt Holliday or Jason Bay will help in the outfield, and the idea that we are too proud of a franchise to entertain the idea of Bonds, or the constant booing, cheering, fire Willie, fire Omar, trade Reyes, trade Beltran, cut Pelfrey knee jerk idea's these people come up with, it is amazing too me that anybody came up with this "NY has the smartest fans in the world" thing. Truth is, they have some very good ones, but a huge amount of them are just knee jerk fans who want to win now, don't understand how baseball works, and just generally could not pass for "intelligent" even among their peers in the remedial classes in junior high.
As a Met fan, here would be my priorites.
1) Sign Bonds, give him 2 weeks to get ready. In the meantime, either give the AB's to Tatis, or call up the kid and let him see what he can do for 2 weeks, just to see how he handles the show.
2)Randy Winn. As I have said, he is not a star, but this does not mean he can't help. Bat him second, use his speed/ switch hitting abilities, stick him in LF and although he is not the optimum LF for any team, he knows how to play and will give you close to a .300 average and veteran leadership with some SB's.
Brian Giles also falls under number 2. Same scenario, stick him in LF/RF, bat him second, and enjoy his great batting eye and his patience while allowing Reyes to steal more bases, and seeing more fastballs should help him offensively while protected by Wright/Reyes. Not a star, but can still help out.
3)Just call up Fernando for 3 weeks or so until the deadline, and if he cannot cut it then you make a deal for a guy like Murton, or you go back to SF and see if Winn is still available.
I do not want anything to do with Matt Holliday whatsoever. Not only because of the fact that I think he will plummet once leaves Coors, but because of the asking price. They were asking for Price from Tampa, so I would expect they would want a Pelfrey and Martinez deal from the Mets. I am not comfortable giving up either of those guys in a trade for Holliday.
Fender, I am completely with you on Bonds, but I jus't dont see it. I hope I am wrong and they sign him, because he would do wonders for their offense, but Wilpon is just too conservative I think. I have been campaigning to bring Barry in since winter though, so I definitely agree with you. Our stupid fans would act all outraged and threaten to boycott the team, until they realized nobody cares once Barry hits a 3 run bomb off the scoreboard in the bottom of the 8th to win a game, then they will love him, you will hear the BARRY chant, and they will want a curtain call. NY fans are so fickle.
Posted by: nrmax88 | July 11, 2008 at 07:17 AM
Bonds would bring a huge media circus to Shea, plus the family-oriented Wilpons would probably not want him. Say what you want about Tatis, he has been hitting the ball well. Would Ken Griffey Jr. waive his no-trade clause to go to the Mets? Don't know. Would Kenny Lofton be a good fit in LF for the Mets? The Mets are about the only team that Lofton hasn't played for, it seems. As for Mike Carp, I heard that the reason why Nick Evans was promoted over Carp was that Evans has better hitting numbers than Carp. Also, Evans is already on the 40-man roster--is Carp?
Posted by: metssincekindergarten | July 11, 2008 at 07:21 AM
Require...my bad.
Posted by: Tim Dierkes | July 11, 2008 at 07:33 AM
I really think the darkhorse here is Juan Rivera from the Angels. He wouldn't cost much since he isn't getting any playing time. The last time he played a full seaso nhe belted out 23 homers and 85 rbi. I would take that any day from my number 6/7 guy.
Posted by: BigMike | July 11, 2008 at 08:19 AM
There is absolutely, unequivically, zero percent chance that Barry Bonds EVER wears a Mets uniform. Period. I don't know how to make it more clear then that.
First of all, it's not just always about what he does on the field. The Mets clubhouse is clearly fragile in nature, it's been pretty well established that the constant questioning about the job status of Randolph did have a negative effect on the clubhouse, they finally get out from under that and are back to having fun again and now you want to subject them to constant questioning about Barry Bonds? That's just asking for a disaster. Some clubhouses might be able to handle that, but it's pretty clear the Mets clubhouse is not one of them.
Secondly, they would get killed by the media for doing such a move, in NY of all places. This is a man who isn't just one of the biggest jerks in the game, but a liar and a cheater as well. With the way this season has gone, do you really think the Mets can afford more negative PR?
Third, the Wilpons always preach about being family-oriented with how they run their club and are among the last owners in baseball that would okay such a move.
And fourth, Bonds' knees are so shot that he cannot play the field anymore. He was in so much pain last year just from playing 7 innings in the field before being replaced.
It's just not happening, period. Get it out of your heads.
Posted by: AdropOFvenom | July 11, 2008 at 08:28 AM
As for what the Mets should do, I want Casey Blake, he has played Corner OF in the past, is Right Handed, can also fill in at 1st and 3rd base if necessary. He's in a contract year from a non-contender so he should be relatively cheap. That is the kind of player that the Mets need. A non-sexy-named role player who can bat 6th or 7th in the lineup.
Posted by: AdropOFvenom | July 11, 2008 at 08:31 AM
Yes, please take Casey Blake.
Posted by: Krambo42 | July 11, 2008 at 08:40 AM
Why does everyone keep saying the Mets and Wilpons won't sign Bonds because they're "family-oriented"? It's because the Wilpons do whatever Selig says. That's why they're the only high-payroll team that still follows slot in the draft.
Posted by: aap212 | July 11, 2008 at 08:41 AM
aap212, I would actually think Selig would want Bonds back in baseball....because surely an investigation into collusion among owners like is currently ongoing makes the game look worse then one roiding cheat.
Posted by: AdropOFvenom | July 11, 2008 at 08:44 AM
Ah, just rub some urine on it!
Posted by: Cubs World Champs please B4 I die | July 11, 2008 at 09:25 AM
"aap212, I would actually think Selig would want Bonds back in baseball....because surely an investigation into collusion among owners like is currently ongoing makes the game look worse then one roiding cheat."
Yes, but he would only be worried about this if there was in fact collusion going on. And if there was collusion going on, then it would be because of Selig that Bonds didn't have a job in the first place. So if he wanted Bonds back in the league for fear of a colluding scandal, then this would spell his guilt on its own, see what I mean? It's sort of a catch 22.
As for Blake, no thank you. We already have Tatis to play all 4 corner spots, spell Delgado, and bat 7th. It is not that he is bad for that role, it just seems like Tatis can do exactly the same thing. If they are going for a 6/7 hitter in LF, I like Ibanez. Big Mike, good point on Juan Rivera also, he just slipped my mind but he is a very good canidate and would be a good pickup.
If the are going to look for an outfielder that can hit 2nd(because in my opinion as good as Endy is as a 4th OF, and as valuable as he is for his dynamic defense, he is not an everyday type hitter, he will get exposed, and the 2 hole is too important.), I really like Randy Winn or Brian Giles if possible. They are both older, veteran guys who know the game, and like you said, they are not the "sexy" names. They are the type of players that dont put up the big numbers you want from a corner, but both fit the 2 hole well in my opinion.
The one thing that I would like about Bonds, Holliday, Bay, or one of these type guys is that it could move Beltran into the 2 hole where he is more comfortable and can use all of his tools to be a fantastic 2 hitter. There was a spot yesterday in a 3-3 game, bottom of the 7th with David Wright on 2nd with nobody out and a scorching Tatis on deck, followed by an also very hot Carlos Delgado, where Beltran tried to drop a bunt down with the 3rd baseman back and was booed. I love the play personally, but it is always ridiculed because people say they dont want this from a cleanup hitter. In the 2 hole he could do this sort of thing freely, bunt for hits, take pitches (which he loves to do and is also criticized for), and use his speed, while also providing some pop. One thing is for certain though, they need to do something and I am almost glad Alou went down now and not 20 days from now like Duaner Sanchez did, forcing Omar to make a quick move to "beat the buzzer" on the trade deadline.
Posted by: nrmax88 | July 11, 2008 at 09:41 AM
"With the way this season has gone, do you really think the Mets can afford more negative PR?"
I think the Mets couldnt care less about the PR if they are winning, and Bonds would certainly help them do that. When Bonds is posting his .275/.400/.550 line nobody will be complaining.
The Mets couldn't handle the constant Willie questioning because it was caused by them losing games last year in september, and this year in april and may. It really had nothing to do with Willie, any manager that orchestrated the collapse and the start of 2008 would have caused the same thing. I don't buy the whole media badgering the players thing either. If they have something they want to know about Bonds, they will ask him. Maybe for a couple of days players will get lots of questions but it will go away.
There is not a shred of evidence Bonds cannot play the field. He might not be great, but in a league where Adam Dunn, Josh Willingham, Pat Burrell, Moises Alou, Matt Diaz, Carlos Lee all play LF, Barry can do it.
Posted by: nrmax88 | July 11, 2008 at 09:46 AM
I cannot believe Bonds isn't already in a Mets Uni.
Don't give me that clubhouse chemistry bull, NONE of you know how he'd affect the clubhouse. NONE of you. So please don't bring it up as if you have some insight into it.
When you have a potential 1000+ OPS Left Fielder waiting to fill the hole your oft-injured LF just vacated, and he'd only cost money, it just makes too much sense.
Posted by: Meoveryouok | July 11, 2008 at 10:26 AM
Sign Barry Bonds. Bring up Fernando martinez for a taste of the big leagues until Barry is ready. Signing Barry might bring media attention for a few weeks but it will subside and fans will like him once the mets start to win ballgames with him.
Posted by: willie randolph sucks | July 11, 2008 at 10:57 AM
"I completely disagree with Icedrake that those guys are the only worth inquiring on. What is wrong with Randy Winn? Brian Giles? These guys would be fantastic number 2 hitters in this lineup."
They don't need a 2 hitter. They need a 5/6 hitter; someone with power.
The guy who isn't mentioned that I think is the best option in terms of what it'd cost and what you'd get is Juan Rivera.
Posted by: icedrake523 | July 11, 2008 at 11:14 AM
Personally, I think the window for moving on Rivera is closing quickly.
Rivera has been getting more and more starts in the OF. He's finally starting to take away AB's from GMJ. In the last few weeks has been very solid.
If you want Rivera at a cheap price you better act fast. Also, Kendry Morales is posting a 900'ish OPS in AAA right now. Can play 1B and the the corner OF positions.
________________________
TypeKey just sucks!
Posted by: bjsguess | July 11, 2008 at 12:16 PM
"I sure hope he put enough money away in his requirement fund."
His estimated salary over his career exceeds $85 million. I think he will be fine. :-P
Sad to see Alou go. He was always one of my favorite players. Truly one of the best hitters of the past 30 years who got screwed out of a better career by injuries.
Posted by: AA | July 11, 2008 at 12:25 PM
"
As for Blake, no thank you. We already have Tatis to play all 4 corner spots, spell Delgado, and bat 7th. It is not that he is bad for that role, it just seems like Tatis can do exactly the same thing. If they are going for a 6/7 hitter in LF, I like Ibanez. Big Mike, good point on Juan Rivera also, he just slipped my mind but he is a very good canidate and would be a good pickup.
If the are going to look for an outfielder that can hit 2nd(because in my opinion as good as Endy is as a 4th OF, and as valuable as he is for his dynamic defense, he is not an everyday type hitter, he will get exposed, and the 2 hole is too important.), I really like Randy Winn or Brian Giles if possible. They are both older, veteran guys who know the game, and like you said, they are not the "sexy" names. They are the type of players that dont put up the big numbers you want from a corner, but both fit the 2 hole well in my opinion." - nrmax88
The difference is that Blake is proven and established that he can handle such a role. Fernando Tatis hasn't been a productive player in the Big Leagues for any extended period of time since 2000. Expecting Tatis to continue to produce like he has would be a mistake. It reminds me of last year when everyone was clamoring for letting Ruben Gotay play, and now he's hitting .208 in Atlanta. Sure, ride them out while they are hot, but sooner or later a guy is going to return to what he is.
And for the record, I don't think where in the lineup we are planning on using them really matters when it comes to acquiring the player. I'm only asking myself "How much can the guy help the team?" (Note: Considering Off-the-field Factors as well) and "How much does it cost to acquire him?", and weighing the 2 options for the best combination of the two. I'm not looking for one player over another because he can hit 2nd in the lineup. Get good players and figure out how to make it all work later.
Posted by: AdropOFvenom | July 11, 2008 at 01:06 PM
"The one thing that I would like about Bonds, Holliday, Bay, or one of these type guys is that it could move Beltran into the 2 hole where he is more comfortable and can use all of his tools to be a fantastic 2 hitter. There was a spot yesterday in a 3-3 game, bottom of the 7th with David Wright on 2nd with nobody out and a scorching Tatis on deck, followed by an also very hot Carlos Delgado, where Beltran tried to drop a bunt down with the 3rd baseman back and was booed. I love the play personally, but it is always ridiculed because people say they dont want this from a cleanup hitter. In the 2 hole he could do this sort of thing freely, bunt for hits, take pitches (which he loves to do and is also criticized for), and use his speed, while also providing some pop. " - nrmax88
People hate anybody on the Mets for bunting, lets be real. Especially when you make the money that Beltran does, they want the bat in your hands. Batting 2nd wouldn't change the hatred for bunting at all with Beltran.
Now, Sandwiching him in between Reyes and Wright gets Beltran a shitload of fastballs to swing at, and I like that idea. But we don't have a clean-up hitter to put in there otherwise, and we don't have the excess chips to acquire one (Short of parting with F-Mart). So that's a luxury we'll probably have to do without.
Posted by: AdropOFvenom | July 11, 2008 at 01:11 PM
"But we don't have a clean-up hitter to put in there otherwise, and we don't have the excess chips to acquire one (Short of parting with F-Mart). So that's a luxury we'll probably have to do without."
Unless you sign Bonds.
Posted by: willie randolph sucks | July 11, 2008 at 05:25 PM
Matt Holliday = No. Only chance they have is if they trade Nando, and Holliday will put up a .280/.360/.460is line in NY. Only to walk in a year. No thank you. Good luck to whoever gives that guy a big deal.
who ever wrote that is a absolute moron get holliday get him now and lock him up guys a stud and i dont wanna here about coors hes batting 320 on the road trade fernando martinez right now to get him
Posted by: miked up | July 11, 2008 at 11:06 PM