![]() |
|
|
| |
« Sheffield Clears Waivers | Main | Huff, Millar, Payton Clear Waivers »
5:05pm: According to John Fay of the Cincinnati Enquirer, the third player going to the Reds in the Dunn trade is catcher Wilkin Castillo. The 24 year-old ranked 14th among D'Backs prospects heading into the season, according to Baseball America. He is able to play many other positions as well.
THURSDAY, 9:52am: Owings has not yet been placed on waivers, according to MLB.com's Mark Sheldon. John Fay says that's because an injured player cannot be placed on waivers, and Owings is dealing with shoulder stiffness. Owings will be put on waivers when he's healthy, though the deal will still be completed in the offseason if a team claims him before the Reds.
TUESDAY: John Fay heard one of the players to be named might be Micah Owings. Nick Piecoro confirms it. That seems fair. C. Trent Rosecrans says the Mariners, Giants, Padres, or Nationals claimed Owings, so they'll have to wait until after the season to officially name him.
MONDAY, 10:27pm: C. Trent Rosecrans heard the players to be named later are on the D'Backs' 40-man roster. Rosecrans expects it to be an MLB-ready starter and a position player.
2:14pm: Jack Magruder says Dunn's remaining $4MM or so will be split between the two teams. He confirms the deal is for Buck plus two prospects to be named later. The price seems reasonable, and the D'Backs can snag a couple of draft picks when Dunn leaves.
1:47pm: Rosenthal has changed his report. It now says a deal was consummated just before the window expired. Dunn is a Diamondback. Apparently big trades can happen in August!
1:45pm: MLB.com's Steve Gilbert says the D'Backs are "close to working out a deal" for Dunn for a minor league pitcher and two players to be named later.
1:41pm: Ken Rosenthal does not agree with Gambadoro's report. Rosenthal says the D'Backs won a waiver claim on Dunn but could not complete a deal before the window expired today.
1:27pm: John Gambadoro of Arizona radio station KTAR 620 reports that the Diamondbacks have acquired outfielder Adam Dunn for three prospects, including pitcher Dallas Buck. Right field is a poor match for Dunn, but this is still an excellent move by Josh Byrnes. Dunn didn't really make sense for the eight NL teams with a better waiver position than Arizona.
Dunn isn't the ideal fit for Arizona, given the strikeouts and defense. But a .900 OPS more than balances out his flaws.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e200e553de15108833
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Dunn Trade Details:


|
|
Gotta say I didn't see that coming if it turns out true.
Posted by: Bank Street Grounds | August 11, 2008 at 01:35 PM
Wow, they are really lucky if that's true. He would be great for them
Posted by: Bosox4416 | August 11, 2008 at 01:37 PM
What do you mean by "right field would be a bad match"?
Wouldn't Dunn still play left in Arizona?
Posted by: 7thinningstretch | August 11, 2008 at 01:41 PM
Did Dunn even clear waivers?
Posted by: icedrake523 | August 11, 2008 at 01:41 PM
Rosenthal says it didn't happen:
http://msn.foxsports.com/mlb/story/8437824/Sources:-D-backs-fail-in-bid-to-land-Reds'-Dunn
Posted by: Bank Street Grounds | August 11, 2008 at 01:41 PM
My fault, I see that the article says he would start in Rightfield. That does not seem logical though. I would think Conor Jackson could play right better than Dunn.
Perhaps this move would put Jackson back at first full time and send Tracy to the bench.
Posted by: 7thinningstretch | August 11, 2008 at 01:44 PM
Rosenthal now says it has happened
Posted by: redhawk61 | August 11, 2008 at 01:46 PM
The fact that the news is coming from a radio station and nowhere else leaves me a bit skeptical about it.
And to 7thinningstretch, I'm assuming that Dierkes assumed Dunn would play RF in Arizona because Conor Jackson is playing LF (and has been great with the bat this year). The RF spot, however, is played by Chris Burke and Alex Romero, both of whom aren't that important for Arizona right now. Conor Jackson can't play RF, even compared to Dunn... therefore, that would leave Dunn to play RF or to have Jackson move back to 1B and their infield possibly being shuffled about.
Posted by: TheMainEvent | August 11, 2008 at 01:46 PM
If this is true, that's great for the DBacks.
Not sure if its a good move for the Reds, since Dunn is pretty much going to be a Type A and the other two prospects in this deal aren't known.
Posted by: melonis rex | August 11, 2008 at 01:47 PM
Ahhh, just saw the new updates from MLB and FOX. Surprising move, definitely.
I guess Arizona felt they needed a boost after seeing Manny ripping it in LA.
Posted by: TheMainEvent | August 11, 2008 at 01:49 PM
Rosenthal is actually one of the best, if not the best, reporters on rumors and trades.
Posted by: icedrake523 | August 11, 2008 at 01:53 PM
I love Josh Byrnes.
Posted by: Not Joe Morgan | August 11, 2008 at 01:55 PM
I think everyone has gotta admit that Josh Byrnes is one of the best executives in baseball.
I mean the guy built up a huge stable of young talent, and now is executing this plan to contend perfectly.
First, he needed another top of the rotation arm to match with stud Brandon Webb. He gets arguably the best pitcher to be traded last winter (in terms of '08 performance) in Haren, and sets up a quality rotation that could contend for a WS.
Then, his bullpen begins to faulter. He trades away a potentially average second baseman in exchange for one of the best relievers on the market, a guy who's under control through 2010 in Jon Rauch.
Now, all along his offense has been streaky as hell. Injuries have taken out key guys all season long, and an inability to consistently provide offense has prevented the team from running away with the division. So the D-Backs add Dunn. For essentially nothing. A solid pitching prospect and a couple other youngsters.
Byrnes knows that now is the time to strike, with two special pitchers and a young, talented lineup.
Posted by: scribbletone | August 11, 2008 at 01:59 PM
Dying to see what AZ gave up. This could be a huge win for them.
And if it turns out that AZ gave up very little why the heck didn't Cinci move him at the deadline. Has anything fundamentally changed in the past 2 weeks?
Posted by: bjsguess | August 11, 2008 at 01:59 PM
The acuisition of Dunn could really help the Diamondbacks start to pull away from the rest of the division. Their offense has been pretty decent this year, and another big bat should really help their pitching staff win more close games. He does strikeout too many times, but a strong veteran presence with light tower power in the middle of a relatively young lineup can make every hitter better. This was a good answer by the D-Backs.
Posted by: TimeToGetReal | August 11, 2008 at 02:04 PM
Does this mean Reynolds to 2B?
Posted by: Not Joe Morgan | August 11, 2008 at 02:07 PM
Arizona gave up three prospects, bjs. One of them is a pitcher named Dallas Buck, the others are PTBNL.
http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=3529966
Posted by: TimeToGetReal | August 11, 2008 at 02:08 PM
Wow. I agree that Josh Byrnes is generally awesome, and this move is indicative of his awesomeness. At the same time, he never should have given (unrelated) Eric Byrnes a 3-year, $30 million contract last year when his system was loaded with you, cheap outfielders. Imagine where the D-Backs would have been this year if they hadn't sold low on Quentin and just let Byrnes walk last offseason!
Crappy organization of the day award goes to:
(1) LA Dodgers - for not putting in a claim to block the D-Backs from making a move on Dunn. They had better waiver position and everyone knew the Reds weren't going to just give Dunn away. The Dodgers could have blocked by putting in a claim, then just not offering anything in return.
(2) Houston Astros - they lose Carlos Lee for the rest of the year and pass on a possible replacement (who is originally from Texas)? They are crazy for thinking they can compete, and even more crazy for not putting in a waiver claim on Dunn if they are actually trying to compete.
Not putting in a waiver claim is further proof that both Colletti and Wade are poor GM's. It is just too obvious a move for both ballclubs.
Posted by: mymrbig | August 11, 2008 at 02:09 PM
This is a good trade for the DBacks, practically a no-brainer. But I wouldn't start to say that this puts them over the top. Dunn is a great power hitter, but he is also one of the streakiest and a terrible situational hitter. Look at his stats and you will see that he has some great months, like July where he hit 12 hrs and hit .300, then see other months when he hits 4. He can't hit a sac fly for the life of him, and is not a good fielder. So this trade can't hurt the DBacks because he is better than what they would put out there, and he has a great OBP.
Posted by: DieHard MetsFan | August 11, 2008 at 02:10 PM
Given how tight they have been on payroll the Dodgers probably couldn't risk getting $4MM dumped on them for yet another OF.
Posted by: Tim Dierkes | August 11, 2008 at 02:16 PM
So are Reds fans gonna say that Adam Dunn was the reason they were losing just like they said Ken Griffey Jr. was the reason?
Posted by: tschram | August 11, 2008 at 02:18 PM
This could help the Dbacks on two fronts they will win the Division and it could help them set the record for the most strikeouts by a team in one season.
Posted by: BucSox | August 11, 2008 at 02:19 PM
This could help the Dbacks on two fronts they will win the Division and it could help them set the record for the most strikeouts by a team in one season.
Posted by: BucSox | August 11, 2008 at 02:20 PM
Now that Dunn is gone, the Reds have essentially 25 million in salary they had tied up in 2 players this year... Is it possible the Reds could be loading up to pursue Sabathia or Holliday? I can only dream...
Posted by: Mainevent41 | August 11, 2008 at 02:21 PM
Tim - where is the risk for the Dodgers? There were no indications the Reds would just dump Dunn (and his draft picks) for salary relief. Maybe their ownership was too stupid to realize it was a smart baseball move with extremely little risk? Who knows, but it was a bad move and no way to run a franchise, especially for a big-market team.
Posted by: mymrbig | August 11, 2008 at 02:23 PM
"Dunn is a K machine, no need for the dodgers to worry. AZ lost Hudson for the year, that team is done."
I'd say when you aquire Manny Ramirez and you still can't make up ground on your divison leader and you are still under .500 that you NEED to worry Dunn is a K machine agreed but the DBacks have been doing ok with Reynolds and Young who strikeout more than Dunn. Diamondbacks win that division and Dodgers cry about missing the playoffs again.
Posted by: BucSox | August 11, 2008 at 02:25 PM
"He can't hit a sac fly for the life of him"
??? To defend Dunn in case such a stat even matters: The MLB average SF rate for runners on 3rd, less than 2 out is 12.6% this year. Dunn is at 15.2%.
Posted by: Not Joe Morgan | August 11, 2008 at 02:27 PM
I'm so confused right now, how is this a good deal for the reds? the centerpiece is dallas buck AND they have to eat salary? WHAT?!
Posted by: The_Bunk | August 11, 2008 at 02:28 PM
And why go for a pitcher as the centerpiece when you have young guys like Cueto, Bailey, Volquez, Maloney, and Thompson between the majors and Triple A and Harang and Arroyo likely to be in that rotation for a while.
Posted by: The_Bunk | August 11, 2008 at 02:31 PM
Josh Byrnes didn't do the Eric Byrnes deal. Moorad overruled him and did that deal.
Posted by: lawdvd | August 11, 2008 at 02:33 PM
There are no words to describe my happiness on this one.
Posted by: Jude22 | August 11, 2008 at 02:53 PM
I don't agree, I think the risk for the Dodgers was large if they can't handle more payroll. We don't know if the Reds would've been willing to dump all $4MM on the Dodgers. It is quite possible; we just don't know. Take the $4MM, spend it on the next Michael Inoa. It would've been a risky claim for the Dodgers given their payroll concerns, and they would have major playing time issues too.
Posted by: Tim Dierkes | August 11, 2008 at 03:11 PM
Unless one of the PTBNL is Jarrod Parker this is a horrible deal for the Reds.
First Bavasi and now this. Dark days to be a Reds fan.
Posted by: schellis | August 11, 2008 at 03:14 PM
2 games above .500 and they are in first place, that is just sad for the division. Getting Dunn prob means that they will finish about .500 which then means a division title.
GO CUBBIES
Posted by: cubs land | August 11, 2008 at 03:59 PM
I can bet the reds wouldn't be in this mess if they still had krivsky at the top...
now that we are fielding a minor league team everyday anyways...eat the rest of patterson's salary...not worth a nickel anyways...
call up chris dickerson from louisville to play center, bruce in right, and call up sean henry or daniel dorn from AA to play left. Both of those guys in AA should be getting an invite to spring training next year anyways so you had might as well give at least one of them a chance to see some at bats this year when there is nothing at stake.
Posted by: coltholt | August 11, 2008 at 04:17 PM
I can't believe I'm defending Ed Wade here, but considering there is a 48 hour window once the claim was made then there is no way the Astros passed on Dunn after the Lee injury. I guess it's bad luck for the Astros that Dunn wasn't put on waivers a day later. Or maybe good luck considering it would have been just another chance for Wade to make-believe his team is in the playoff race.
Posted by: jc2125 | August 11, 2008 at 06:05 PM
Coltholt, there is no reason to think the Reds are going to rush players to the majors to make some fans happy. They already made that mistake with Homer Bailey. They'll get their chance and call up when they're ready for it.
Posted by: Bank Street Grounds | August 11, 2008 at 06:45 PM
Well this could mean Reynolds or Upton to second base, i say move Reynolds and prepare him for next season cause I don't see Hudson coming back (although he may be cheaper now). Upton might be a good choice though cause he did play shortstop when he was originally drafted if I remember right.
Posted by: Raptor | August 11, 2008 at 08:01 PM
to those of you who feel the acquisition of dunn by arizona was a bad deal, i'm curious as to whats so bad about getting two high draft picks? thats what they get if he leaves right?
come to think of it Houston could use two draft picks.....
Posted by: roguesaw | August 11, 2008 at 08:23 PM
"Do you know the guy doesn’t really like baseball that much?"
Posted by: TheMainEvent | August 11, 2008 at 09:03 PM
"Do you know the guy doesn’t really like baseball that much?"
I'll take that guy when he hits two homers and walks half a dozen times a week over your typical "gritty little gamer" who eats, sleeps, bathes and brushes his teeth with baseball, thank you.
guy who loves baseball < guy who can actually play baseball
Posted by: az2pa | August 11, 2008 at 09:18 PM
Very nice! Im just glad to see Dunn leave the Central, he F----- kills the Cubs, hopefully we wont have to see him again!
Posted by: bcaine | August 11, 2008 at 09:42 PM
"Coltholt, there is no reason to think the Reds are going to rush players to the majors to make some fans happy. They already made that mistake with Homer Bailey. They'll get their chance and call up when they're ready for it."
First, tell me where I said that they should do anything to make the fans happy. Second, Dickerson was out of the lineup today for Louisville, therefore he is already getting a call up. After that, there is nobody else at AAA deserving of playing time. I simply said that Sean Henry has been great at AA all year, and will get an invite to spring training, so they had might as well give him some ABs. They wouldn't be the first team to call someone up from AA, it actually happens quite often
Posted by: coltholt | August 11, 2008 at 10:00 PM
Longoria's and Crawford's injuries could force the Rays to make a trade. Sheffield, anyone?
Posted by: Gvelta | August 11, 2008 at 10:36 PM
The players to be named later don't necessarily have to be on the 40 man roster.
They could be players from last year's draft that very close to the 8/15 signing deadline. Remember, player's chosen in the draft can't be traded until a year after they sign, with PTBNL as a workaround.
Or it could just be a "choose any 2 of these 4 players" type thing they agreed to resolve later considering they only had a short time window to make the trade after the waiver claim was made.
Posted by: yanksfan | August 11, 2008 at 10:50 PM
Actually, a player on the 40 man CAN'T be a PTBNL.
Posted by: yanksfan | August 11, 2008 at 10:53 PM
I guess Dunn "clogged the bases" one too many times. Dusty no likey. Patterson is banging Dusty's daughter, hence playing time and disappearing outfielders.
Posted by: GlenallenHill | August 11, 2008 at 11:07 PM
the reds assistant GM said the players have already been decided on, they just have to "go through all the procedures"
Posted by: redhawk61 | August 12, 2008 at 12:02 AM
Scherzer is not in the deal. Like, duh.
I could see the D-backs giving up on Owings, though.
Posted by: The Globalizer | August 12, 2008 at 09:23 AM
I think yanksfan might be right about the 40 man thing. Otherwise, they'd have to clear waivers, no?
With that question still up in the air, The Globalizer's Owings theory is an interesting one. Owings, for all his problems this year, is still a promising player due to his makeup and baseball IQ. It's funny how quickly the tide turns. I remember early in the year when Yanks fans were bitching about how close they were to getting Owings in the Randy Johnson deal and plenty of other fans would've killed to have Owings as their future No. 3 or 4. He'll be alright with a little work and might mitigate what otherwise looks like a terrible deal for the Reds.
Another option on the PTBN front is Miguel Montero. The Reds designated Ross this week and really have no catcher moving forward (Paul Bako?). Montero is still just 24 and a couple years removed from being one of the game's top catching prospects...a kid with monster power and an all-around quality bat. He moves well behind the plate and has rare athleticism for a catcher. I could definitely see him turning it around with a fresh start elsewhere. There's just too much talent there and he isn't getting his reps sitting behind Snyder (a much superior defender at present). Montero has the goods to become an above average MLB regular and would be a great 'get' in this instance.
Buck has some promise, but the health issues are a red flag. He's struggled a bit in coming back from a shoulder injury, but his stuff- when healthy- is pretty darned good. Also- and I'm getting this from BA for what that's worth- the D'backs were pretty impressed with how well his stuff played while HURT. The idea being that, healthy, he could be a beast.
For the Reds, it all comes down to those PTBN guys. If neither Owings, nor Montero...or Tracy for that matter, is included, I think you'd have to describe the move as a colossal failure.
For the 'backs...well, other posters have put it nicely: Byrnes is simply one of the top executives working in baseball right now. Aside from the Eric Byrnes signing (I'm not going to quibble with who is actually to 'blame'), his track record is fantastic. And while many of the club's top young players were actually drafted prior to his watch, credit has to be given for showing patience (with most- Quentin the notable exception) and working a plan.
The Quentin deal never made much sense to me, but even THAT trade had a hand in the Haren move: Chris Carter for whom Quentin was moved, was part of the deal that brought Haren from the A's.
Perhaps the biggest coup of this deal for Dunn is that the D'backs can and probably will take advantage of Dunn's big bat for the rest of the season, then offer arbitration and watch what happens. If he accepts, they get a big bopper to add a bit more punch to an OF that projects for ridiculous present- and future- production: Justin Upton, Chris Young, and Dunn. You've got a former All Star in Byrnes as your 4th OF'er!!!
Better yet, if Dunn passes, its two more picks for the 'backs, who have set themselves up for an absolute bonanza in next year's draft- supposedly the best and deepest since '05.
Hudson is sure to be Type A and now seems almost certain to go (though you can bet the 'backs will offer arbitration- it's a no lose situation). That's 2 picks. Also, both Lyon and Cruz are likely Type B's and possible A's. They'd almost be better off if the two were both B's but it doesn't matter- considering the premium placed on bullpen help these days and their reasonable current salaries, they too will almost certainly be offered arbitration. Again, if they decline, more picks. Now Dunn, another certain Type A gives them further opportunity. He's not so sure a bet- which, I'm sure, is why Cincy was willing to deal him for scraps- but there's still a very real chance that Arizona will offer him arbitration, since their payroll isn't particularly high right now and it would only be one year.
It's HIGHLY unlikely EVERYTHING will break their way, but still pretty scary that a team as loaded with young talent as Arizona- poised to compete for the NL West crown for at least the next 5 or 6 years already- could, potentially, have 9 picks between the first, supplemental first, and second rounds of one of the most talent-laden drafts of the last decade. Wow!
Posted by: milehigh78 | August 12, 2008 at 12:50 PM
Before we give Josh Byrnes too much credit we should also mention a few other misguided steps his had in his tenure with the DBacks.
He was in charge when Dan Uggla was lost through Rule V and also traded Scott Hairston last year to the Padres, a division rival, for a relief pitcher who was injured.
Everyone knows the story on Uggla but for those who aren't familiar with Hairston, he has a higher OPS playing out of Petco, at league minimum, than any outfielder on the Dbacks Squad prior to moving Connor Jackson there.
If I made mistakes the size of Quentin, Uggla, Eric Byrnes, and Hairston at my job I'd be fired, so let's hold off on the Josh Byrnes medal a while.
Posted by: tmar | August 12, 2008 at 07:55 PM
"C. Trent Rosecrans says the Mariners, Giants, Padres, or Nationals claimed Owings"
Ya think?? I bet every one of those teams would put a claim on him. Pretty stupid to think they could get a live arm like Owings through waivers. If anything, they could give the guy an outfielders glove and he could hit 20+ homers a year for a team.
Posted by: thr33niL | August 12, 2008 at 09:00 PM
If the reds do land owings this just became a respectable trade.
Posted by: coltholt | August 12, 2008 at 09:04 PM
I hitting pitcher like Owings totally changes the roster dynamics. It almost becomes a 26 man roster...on days he doesn't pitch.
Awesome move by Walt.
Posted by: Dave from Louisville | August 12, 2008 at 09:14 PM
ESPN just said on Sports Center (11 PM Central) than Owings is going to the Reds.
Posted by: ChiSox33 | August 12, 2008 at 11:00 PM
Why does it matter that the Mariners claimed Owings? Should the Reds be higher on the waiver priority since the D-Backs and Reds are both NL teams?
Posted by: raysrule07 | August 12, 2008 at 11:25 PM
Wow this would rock. Sounds like two solid pitching reclamation projects for a guy that was going to walk after this year anyway. I guess it comes down to are Buck + Owings + PTBNL better than the two draft picks the reds would have gotten otherwise. I'm inclined to say yes and I'm ecstatic to get Owings!
Posted by: TheCincyKid | August 12, 2008 at 11:37 PM
Unless I'm mistakened myself, I dont believe C. Trent Rosecrans, or ESPN for that matter, understands how the waiver process works....Seattle does not matter
Posted by: cincy_11 | August 12, 2008 at 11:48 PM
With Owings, this is a solid deal for Cincy. I still think I might have hung on to him for the draft picks considering the reputed quality and depth of this coming draft, but since much of that talent is coming from the high school ranks and the Reds are setting themselves up for a more immediate push toward contention, it's understandable that they take a bit of cap relief and add to the MLB ready talent pool they've already established. One point alluded to above is Owings' skill with the bat... Much as I like the kid- and considering he'll only be 26 at the beginning of '09, his best years are still ahead of him- and think he can be a very good middle of the rotation type, I would be tempted, considering the Reds' rotation and soon-to-be-ready pitchers in the minors, to take my chances, roll the dice, and send Owings down to the minors to reestablish himself as a hitter.
Dont' get me wrong- it's an insane thought and WON'T happen- but based on what he's already shown at the plate and on the mound, I can't help but think the 'backs developed Owings incorrectly. With work, I genuinely believe he could become an All Star at a less demanding position. If he can do what he's been able to do without the benefit of instruction and experience, I would be FASCINATED to see that talent fully unleashed. Again, it won't happen, but damn would it be interesting.
Posted by: milehigh78 | August 13, 2008 at 12:44 PM
i have no problem with this deal as a reds fan. we got a couple pretty young pitchers and a catching prospect. There was no guarentee the reds would get two draft picks next year anyway because they would have had to offer dunn arbitration and he would have had to reject it for the reds to get the picks. also the way things are looking the reds might not be signing yonder alonso so if that happens they should get 2 top 10 picks in a deeper draft next year
Posted by: redsfan | August 14, 2008 at 05:20 PM
I tend to agree that Owings should be converted into a position player. He has actually hit better than Ankiel did when he was pitching, and he has never shown that he can be the pitcher Ankiel was before he developed Steve Blass syndrome. The reality is that Owings is a fairly talented pitcher, but I don't think he projects to anything better than a 4th or 5th starter. Meanwhile, he is a very good hitter and can probably throw missiles from the outfield given the history of converted pitchers, including Ankiel. He would probably take less time to develop, given that he is already 2-3 steps ahead of Ankiel as a hitter.
Posted by: AA | August 14, 2008 at 05:27 PM