![]() |
|
|
| |
« Stark's Latest: Manny, Fuentes, Livan, Dunn | Main | Dunn Trade Details »
THURSDAY: Unsurprisingly, Sheffield cleared waivers today.
WEDNESDAY: Sheffield's agent noted that he has not asked for a trade, but might be willing to waive his no-trade clause under the right conditions (perhaps the chance to play the outfield every day). Sheffield is expected to clear waivers tomorrow afternoon. It's often been said that Sheff thrives on controversy, and he bashed two home runs last night.
TUESDAY: According to ESPN's Jayson Stark, the Tigers placed Gary Sheffield on waivers today. Sheffield recently expressed displeasure with his playing time. The 39 year-old DH is hitting .219/.321/.371 in 278 plate appearances this year while dealing with oblique and shoulder woes. Peter Gammons recently wrote that the Tigers shopped Sheffield to the Rays but they had no interest.
Sheffield is owed an additional $3.8MM this year plus $14MM in '09. He also has a limited no-trade clause. His last good full month was July of '07. A waiver claim on Sheffield seems unlikely. If a contender needs a DH, why not pursue Aubrey Huff instead?
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e200e553e146ec8833
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Sheffield Clears Waivers:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
If anyone is stupid enough to actually claims him, the Tigers should dump him right then and there.
If/when he clears waivers, the Tigers are going to have to eat the contract.
Posted by: melonis rex | August 12, 2008 at 04:58 PM
Bet the Astros get him ...
Posted by: bjsguess | August 12, 2008 at 05:13 PM
Maybe the Dodgers will sign hime they dont have enough overpaid low producing egomaniacs.
Posted by: ryno23 | August 12, 2008 at 05:26 PM
Exactly how many overpaid egomaniacs do they have?
What qualifies as an egomaniac? And also, who isn't overpaid?
Posted by: Meoveryouok | August 12, 2008 at 05:28 PM
Meoveryouok:
That depeneds on what your definition of is is.
Posted by: joemorgan=#1 | August 12, 2008 at 05:43 PM
Why don't the Cubs pursue Aubrey Huff? The process would be easy, Designate Daryle Ward for assignment becasue he only hitting .221 and not doing anything to help. Then Huff and Fukudome can plantoon because Fukudome is doing terrible. Huff also can give Lee and Ramirez days off too. It would be one of the smartest moves Jim Hendry would make if he did get Huff. Who else agrees with me?
Posted by: CUBBIES2008 | August 12, 2008 at 05:53 PM
"Maybe the Dodgers will sign hime they dont have enough overpaid low producing egomaniacs."
And who would qualify as that? Even if you think Manny is an egomaniac, a dubious claim, the Dodgers aren't the ones paying him and he definately isn't "low producing"
Jones? Overpaid? Sure. Low producing? No doubt. Egomaniac? Nah.
Same deal with Pierre, and at least he provides some very strong elements: speed and clutch hitting
MAYBE Kent fits that mold, but he has been robbed of at least .15 points of BA this year on balls that were absolutely smoked.
Posted by: AA | August 12, 2008 at 05:57 PM
"Same deal with Pierre, and at least he provides some very strong elements: speed and clutch hitting"
I agree with you on Jones and Kent. Kent's LD % is too high for his BABIP to be that low.
Juan Pierre is fits the bill. He's an egomaniac because he thinks he should be a starter. The only thing Juan Pierre is good for is pinch running and pinch bunting. And I guess pinch hitting when your first 2-3 PH have already been used. Way overpaid. Maybe he isn't underproducing though. He's just bad.
Clutch hitting doesn't exist and speed is the least useful of the 5 tools. The 5 tools are pretty silly because it implies that they're all equal, which they aren't.
Posted by: Victor | August 12, 2008 at 06:50 PM
The Rays should get Sheff. Now that Crawford and Longo are on the DL, they need another bat in the linep. He could be used as a DH and get an occasional start in the outfield.
Posted by: Sal from Tampa | August 12, 2008 at 06:55 PM
huff would be much better than for the rays than sheffield. huff is hitting over .300 where sheffield is at .219. also, sheffield wants to play OF but is a liability there with injuries. Huffs defense is no where near solid, but less problems injury wise. also, the $$$ could be better with huff unless detroit eats all of sheffs salery (which they might do)....either way tampa needs another bat in the line up, even before they lost crawford and longoria.
Posted by: j dello | August 12, 2008 at 07:47 PM
“If/when he clears waivers, the Tigers are going to have to eat the contract.”
…Its doesn’t seem to be that kind of Waivers ~ he has only been put on the normal revocable waivers that all players get put on at this time of year from what I understand. If he was really waived with the purpose of releasing him, then he wouldn’t be in the lineup.
If he’s claimed, the team will probably try to make a trade (maybe do like the Tribe with Byrd, taking a PTBNL or Cash just to send him elseware) if someone else wants him ~ but if no one puts in a claim I imagine he finishes the year with the KittyKats.
Posted by: darkstar1661 | August 12, 2008 at 08:11 PM
im atheist, but i sure did pray last night that Sheffield is moved today...
but its not gonna happen.
Posted by: Quantumleaper(GoTigers) | August 13, 2008 at 04:35 PM
Tigers should release Shef and renteria. They should also see if they can get anything for rodney AND Zumaya. I'd take a crate of bananas for Rodney.
Posted by: Calriver | August 14, 2008 at 04:06 PM
CUBBIES 2008,
Totally agree. They need to get either Huff or Ibanez (s/p). Houston will take Ward, they are buyers 365 days a year.
CO CUBBIES
Posted by: cubs land | August 14, 2008 at 04:19 PM
"Juan Pierre is fits the bill. He's an egomaniac because he thinks he should be a starter. The only thing Juan Pierre is good for is pinch running and pinch bunting. And I guess pinch hitting when your first 2-3 PH have already been used. Way overpaid. Maybe he isn't underproducing though. He's just bad."
Given that Pierre has been a starter his whole career and has contributed to some very good teams, I don't think it is ego maniacal for him to think he should start. Not to say he should, because he is clearly the 4th best outfielder on that team, and probably 5th best once Delwyn Young returns from injury. Juan Pierre is talented enough to be a starter on a MLB team, he just isn't worth the contract and isn't better than the combination of Ramirez, Kemp and Ethier.
"Clutch hitting doesn't exist and speed is the least useful of the 5 tools."
Clutch hitting doesn't exist? So you are telling me a single with the bases clear is just as important as one with second and third and 2 out? In a perfect world, all players would have the same approach at the plate every time they play and all pitchers would pitch them the same, but it doesn't work that way. People like Casey Blake and Maicer Izturis are prized because they adjust their approach when they have a chance to drive in runs, whereas Adam Dunn doesn't change anything and drives in far fewer than he should given his power.
As for speed being the least valuable, I don't exactly disagree. The most valuable tool, by far, is the ability to hit for average and contact. That said, speed can make a huge difference in the ability to get on base, along with influencing the ability of other players to get good pitches to hit.
Posted by: AA | August 14, 2008 at 04:26 PM
Sheffield has a bad shoulder, bad knees, a bad contract, a bad attitude and is hitting all of .219.
"F" SHEFF!
Posted by: jjyankeesfan2 | August 14, 2008 at 05:01 PM
“People like Casey Blake and Maicer Izturis are prized because they adjust their approach when they have a chance to drive in runs, whereas Adam Dunn doesn't change anything and drives in far fewer than he should given his power.”
…HAHAHA!!! I just read someone claiming Casey “Left-On-Blake” to be a good clutch hitter… Indians fans everywhere are laughing their @sses off seeing that one… For his career, Blake knocks in a guy 25% of the time when there is a man on with that pitiful .237/.323/.382 line, and 37% when there is someone in scoring position with an even worse .245/.315/.389 line ~ that’s pitiful, and probably one of the worst you will find in the game really…
But whatever, lets get back on track... Now, because you are just in your normal attack-Dunn over incorrect crap thing you go into on a seemingly daily basis, lets go over this for you real fast:
Manny ~ Men On / 197 AB, 71 RBI… 36.0% ... RISP / 107 AB, 53 RBI… 49.5%
Blake ~~ Men On / 170 AB, 59 RBI… 34.7% …RISP / 104 AB, 56 RBI… 53.8%
Izturis ~~ Men On/ 111 AB, 35 RBI… 31.5% …RISP / 069 AB, 33 RBI… 47.8%
Dunn ~~ Men On / 147 AB, 54 RBI… 36.7% …RISP / 093 AB, 48 RBI… 51.6%
So, Men-On = Dunn #1, Manny second, Blake third and Izturis a distant forth…
Runners in SP = Blake #1, Dunn #2, Manny third and Izturis again at the bottom…
To recap: so much for that "Dunn isnt clutch" Crap ~ Dunn's been the best of the bunch… But I guess something foolish like that should be expected from someone who would also claim that “The most valuable tool, by far, is the ability to hit for average and contact”…
Posted by: darkstar1661 | August 14, 2008 at 07:13 PM
"I just read someone claiming Casey “Left-On-Blake” to be a good clutch hitter…"
You taken a look at his numbers this year? That is the biggest reason the Dodgers traded for him.
"But I guess something foolish like that should be expected from someone who would also claim that “The most valuable tool, by far, is the ability to hit for average and contact”…"
Of those 5 tools: Average, Speed, Throwing, Fielding and Power, Average has to win every time. Anyone can work out and throw an uppercut on their swing to develop power. Even Ozzie Smith could hit homers from time to time. Hell, look at the way Kirby Puckett developed power over his career. It is much harder to make consistent contact with the ball than it is to throw big power swings out there and jack balls out of the park. Further, to be able to make consistent contact enables players to make better swings and drive the ball out. You can't tell me that what Dunn does is easier than what Ichiro or Gwynn did.
"To recap: so much for that "Dunn isnt clutch" Crap ~ Dunn's been the best of the bunch…"
No he hasn't. The lower average means he will have an uneven distribution of those RBI, which makes him less valuable to the team as a whole. He can pile on one night with a 3 run homer and do nothing for the next 3-4. Walking doesn't do much good with runners on (unless loaded) because you still have to depend on the next guy to drive them in.
I know you are obsessed with Dunn, but that doesn't mean he is going to ever lead a team to the playoffs or hurting his team with a huge number of 0fers every year.
Posted by: AA | August 14, 2008 at 07:48 PM
“You taken a look at his numbers this year? That is the biggest reason the Dodgers traded for him.”
Hahaha ~ yeah, “Left-On-Blake” must have just ‘figured it out’ in this, his age 34 season, and 13th in professional ball. He now does all this trickery where he “adjust(s) (his) approach when (he has) a chance to drive in runs”… Cant just be a complete fluke or anything ~ he’s now plays for the team you root for so he has to somehow be one of the best in the game with this amazing approach or whatever. That’s how it usually goes, right?
“You can't tell me that what Dunn does is easier than what Ichiro or Gwynn did.”
…Easier? Who knows ~ but I’ll tell you this, Dunn’s approach at the plate is just as, to even much more valuable to his team as Ichiro or Gwynn or Puckett were. How do I know this? Well, this:
Dunn ~~ 0678 Runs, 4572 PA = scored in 15% of PA (with .241 career BA)
Ichiro ~~ 0861 Runs, 5736 PA = scored in 15% of PA (with .331 BA, .090 higher)
Gwynn ~ 1383 Runs, 10232 PA = score in 14% of PA (with .338 BA, .097 higher)
Kirby ~~ 1071 Runs, 7831 PA = scored in 14% of PA (with .318 BA, .077 higher)
…Now, considering that Ichiro, Gwynn and Puckett never had the RBI totals that Dunn puts up, its actually quite easy to figure out that Dunn means more runs for his team at the plate than any of the four…(well, Pukett gets close ~ guess he is about equal with him…)
…Anyway, so much for that “Average has to win every time” theory ~ BA doesn’t mean Runs on the board in any way, shape or form… Just another blatantly incorrect statement proving how little you must actually know about the game...
“The lower average means he will have an uneven distribution of those RBI, which makes him less valuable to the team as a whole. He can pile on one night with a 3 run homer and do nothing for the next 3-4.”
…Hummm… Ok, so lets do this then ~ Number of games with atleast 1 RBI:
Manny ~ 47
Dunn ~~ 43
Blake ~~ 41
Izturis ~ 27
…So whats the next blatantly incorrect theory youre going to pull out of your rear?
Lastly,
“know you are obsessed with Dunn, but that doesn't mean he is going to ever lead a team to the playoffs or hurting his team with a huge number of 0fers every year.”
…Not obsessed with Dunn in the least, just cant stand when people say stupid, blatantly incorrect things. And it seems that every time you open your mouth you are trying to talk bad about Dunn over things you obviously just make up ~ there sure isnt anything to actually support them afterll…
Posted by: darkstar1661 | August 14, 2008 at 08:46 PM