![]() |
|
|
| |
« Odds And Ends: Taveras, Brewers, Kent | Main | Mariners' Top Pick Remains Unsigned »
Earlier this week Hank Steinbrenner promised changes this off-season for the Yankees. Today Joel Sherman of the New York Post speculates on what those changes could look like...
Cork Gaines writes for RaysIndex.com and can be reached here.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e200e554eff5a08834
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Sherman's Latest: Yankees' Off-Season Plans:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
I really don't think Phil Hughes could land anything right now. You'd be selling VERY low on him as he hasn't been able to stay healthy for 2 straight seasons and even when he is, he hasn't been very effective.
I'm sure they'd love Victorino, but who do they have to land him?
Posted by: Paul | August 31, 2008 at 11:18 AM
Would the Yankees be willing to move Hughes for a Max Ramirez or Saltalamacchia from Texas?
Both guys could take over at first or catcher if Posada proves incapable of catching. It'd give them more flexibility as well as a potentially plus power bat.
Posted by: scribbletone | August 31, 2008 at 11:19 AM
not those three--- but i can see a cano for a laffey or sowers?? that may actually help both teams
Posted by: Bearcat1971 | August 31, 2008 at 11:22 AM
Hughes for Votto...really...not gonna happen. Hughes injuries for Votto Reds best hitter. The Yankee, or at least their beat writers, just think they can get anyone don't they
Posted by: redhawk61 | August 31, 2008 at 11:29 AM
Cano is a talented young ballplayer but he's really hurting his value with his lazy, lackluster performance this year. Maybe a change of scenery is the kick in the rear-end that he needs.
Posted by: MickS | August 31, 2008 at 11:30 AM
cano for billingsley/cain---bite me sherman. no way, no how. especially after cano's '08.
Posted by: J.L. | August 31, 2008 at 11:30 AM
I would hate if the Reds traded Joey Votto for anyone is a young and good, and Phil Hughes is horrible
Posted by: joeyvotto | August 31, 2008 at 11:39 AM
Moving hughes would be a big mistake but with a steinbrenner taking the reigns from cashman again I'm sure all this lunacy will happen and worse.I'll take hughes over burnett all day. Burnett is going to rob another team. Sabathia is fine but getting more then Santana seems a little out there. Zito's deal seems more reasonable. Cano could not bring in cain or billingsley I don't know where the hell that comes from. Victorino is a real good player but I think melky and damon will do. Their outfield seems pretty set with nady,matsui,damon,cabrera,and possibly abreu.I don't see the fit here. A young catcher would be nice if posada is unable to catch then they could move him to first buy out giambi and not worry about signing tex.I could seea kennedy for salty trade.Hughes would be pushing it. But if posada can still catch pay giambi's buyout then sign him for less. The yankees don't need offensive pieces they need pitching. Sabathia,Moose,Pettite,Joba,Kenedy,Wang,Hughes that's pretty deep no way they have the same amount of injuries they did this year.
Posted by: joemorgan=#1 | August 31, 2008 at 11:39 AM
Sherman is a clown
I almost confused him with Heyman, who has a love affair with Cano, but it doesn't make much of a difference.
They are both inept.
Posted by: Meoveryouok | August 31, 2008 at 11:47 AM
I don't think Kennedy nets Salty. I don't think Kennedy nets much of anything. I think only Yankee fans see him as valuable at this point. It would be wiser for the Yankees to hold onto him and hope he rebuilds a little value. They'd have to sell low if they moved him at this point.
Posted by: MickS | August 31, 2008 at 11:48 AM
Once again Sherman show's how big of a moron he is.
A.J. Burnett is an overrated starter.
Shane Victorinio is a bad center fielder so much so that the Phillies have wanted to move him back to right field because he cannot throw from center.
Kennedy might net something but not a lot.
Hughes is still highly rated by everyone so he is worth a lot but you don't trade him for an overrated starter.
Cano is worth more than just a basic starter with his overall production he just needs an ass kicker.
They need a new third base coach more than anything.
Joey Votto is not going anywhere.
Posted by: theshadow | August 31, 2008 at 12:21 PM
Billingsley for Cano... Their ace for a decent 2nd baseman... I guess the Dodgers have made some questionable moves lately, but no way they even consider this.
Posted by: cheba63 | August 31, 2008 at 12:35 PM
I don't know if anyones noticed this or not, but pitching hasn't been the major problem.. our rotation has been servicable... we haven't hit anything.
I say let Giambi and Abreu go and sign Tex (just not to a 10 year contract); I don't think he's going to get one from anyone anyway. Maybe 5 years with performance vesting options. Let Gardner/Cabrera/Jackson patrol CF and hit 9th... and move Nady to RF..
Posada can still catch, he should heal 100% from this surgery, but they'll still have molina to back him up and he can also use a DH day here and there and split that time with Matsui.
I say sign 2 of the CC/Sheets/Burnett trifecta.. get rid of Pettite and his 16 million... Maybe even bring Pavano back on some Mark Prior type deal (he's pitching very well so far)...
Wang
Joba
CC/Sheets/Burnett (2 of the 3)
Moose
I mean Burnett and, or sheets is going to be better then pettite, especially the way he's pitched this year, and probably for the same $$
and keep hughes developing.. I mean the kids only 22 year old... If he can stay healthy, he's going to be good.
I think Kennedy will be a good pitcher in the majors... but i don't think he can do it in NY... he needs to go a small market to succeed.
Posted by: casper | August 31, 2008 at 12:35 PM
Even with his off year, Cano is one of the best second basemen in baseball...
and the guy is having a good 2nd half as usual.. he's still young himself.. I wouldn't move him. Even with Jeter's defense at SS i still keep the IF the way it is, with the exception of Giambi... Gotta get someone like Tex in there...
Posted by: casper | August 31, 2008 at 12:37 PM
As a fan of neither team, I think Cano for Cain would be a pretty fair trade. Both are very talented but prone to underachievement
Posted by: wayne gomes | August 31, 2008 at 12:45 PM
"Shane Victorinio is a bad center fielder so much so that the Phillies have wanted to move him back to right field because he cannot throw from center."
Well that's just wrong.
I know the metrics show he has been slightly below average in CF this year but I would question how much CBP has an effect on those ratings. Look at Rowand's RZR last year playing CF in the Bank....decidedly below average, and now he's tops in the league playing in spacious Pac Bell. Unless he magically added a step I'd say CBP is a bad park for CF metrics
From my naked eye I notice he takes some awkward routes going back on balls from CF after adjusting from RF, but more often than not he makes the play. He is clearly a better CF than Melky Cabrera IMO, comparable arms but Victorino covers a lot more ground
Also his arm is not bad. Far from it. His arm may have been better from RF but he still has an above average arm. And they have not discussed or even considered moving him from CF, not sure where you got that from
Posted by: wayne gomes | August 31, 2008 at 12:51 PM
How much do you think it would cost NY to get Peavy away from San Diego???
Posted by: casper | August 31, 2008 at 12:53 PM
Casper...
"Even with his off year, Cano is one of the best second basemen in baseball..."
Seriously? i can think over a handful without even trying...have you ever heard of Brandon Phillips, Chase Utley, Brian Roberts, Ian Kinsler, or Dan Uggla. These guys have all put up better numbers than Cano in his BEST year. Beyond that you have Hudson, Pedroia who are easily as good as Cano.
at least some people have common sense on here...i don't have to go any further on how stupid a thought the hughes for votto idea is. cano for billingsley is bull...you would be lucky to land billingsley for kennedy/hughes and cano.
Posted by: coltholt | August 31, 2008 at 12:56 PM
casper I don't even think the Yankees could afford Tex and two of the top 3 FA pitchers. You are talking over 350 mio in payroll right there, and they were just complaining that they couldn't afford Santana
Posted by: wayne gomes | August 31, 2008 at 12:57 PM
350 mio assuming CC is one of the two pitchers
Posted by: wayne gomes | August 31, 2008 at 12:57 PM
I have only superficial knowledge fo the Yankees roster and farm system. If Cano is moved, who would play 2B? It doesn't look like the system is rich in infielders. Am I wrong?
Posted by: MickS | August 31, 2008 at 12:58 PM
What's with all the "sign Burnett" posts? He is not even a free agent, so obiouvlsy he's with the Jays unless traded
I hope they don't go after him anyway, too injury prone....Getting Burnett is as bad as getting Pavano lol
I say get CC
1- CC
2- Wang
3- Joba
4- Mussina (re-sign to a 1 year)
5- Hughes
CC/Wang/Joba in my mind would be one of the best 1-2-3's in baseball
Not sure why some people are more for re-signing Pettitte and not Mussina, look at the years they are having. Mussina's ERA is a full run lower, and his W-L record is incredible
I'm not saying he will have a good year next year, but I still think a 1 year deal is good to give to Mussina. Pettitte hasn't been consistent too much. He has his good games, but he also has his terrible games (such as right now, 4-0 Jays in the 3rd inning)
Posted by: mike923 | August 31, 2008 at 12:58 PM
mike why would Mussina take a one-year deal? He could definitely get multiple years from some team the way he has been throwing
Posted by: wayne gomes | August 31, 2008 at 01:00 PM
$350 mil.? Isn't it already embarrassing enough that they can't win a championship with a $200 mil. payroll?
Posted by: MickS | August 31, 2008 at 01:00 PM
that is correct Micks, they're not rich in Infielders. But when you have A-Rod for 9 more years, and Jeter maybe for 3-4 more years, and Cano at the age of 25, and if Tiexera is signed, he is 28, then you don't need to worry too much about the Infielders if you ask me, at least not for several more years
I'd be more concerned for sure with OF's which they are not too bad in. Damon and Matsui will be gone after 09, and Abreu might be gone as early as next year.
Posted by: mike923 | August 31, 2008 at 01:01 PM
350 I meant for the life of the contracts for all three players not total for next season, but I get your point.
Posted by: wayne gomes | August 31, 2008 at 01:01 PM
actually billingsley for cano could happen. i can't remember where i read it (Yahoo Sports, maybe?) but joe torre said he would take cano any day of the week over any second baseman in baseball and that he would really push for a cano trade. i personally say billingsley for cano is dumb because billingsley is a beast and cano is... kinda lame. but if the yanks could take advantage of the torre-cano love affair and the dodgers' terrible moves record, then more power to them.
Posted by: 5th Beatle?! | August 31, 2008 at 01:02 PM
Wayne, I wouldn't mind a 2 year deal, I just don't expect the Yankees if they re-sign him to give Mussina more than 2 years
Posted by: mike923 | August 31, 2008 at 01:02 PM
Peavy would require Cano and probably another top tier prospect like Jackson I dont think SD parts with Peavy unless they get overpayed. Also Cano is not one of the top 2B he is not in the same category as Uggla, Utley, Kinsler. He isn't even in the next tier down Pedroia, Derosa, Phillips.
Posted by: BucSox | August 31, 2008 at 01:06 PM
Peavy = ace signed at a below market deal = basically untouchable
Posted by: wayne gomes | August 31, 2008 at 01:07 PM
mike 923-
I completely agree on that pitching rotation. It is easily attainable, and would be one of the best in the game. People forget that Hughes was the #1 pitching prospect in America, but then he was overshadowed by Joba. He's still one of the best young pitchers in the game and has proven he can be affective when healthy.
Posted by: hebrewhammer1989 | August 31, 2008 at 01:13 PM
bucsox,
i agree with you for the most part minus having phillips as second tier. He is easily top tier.
He has a solid bat and speed but he combines that with THE BEST glove at second base. his errors are inflated because they are on balls that nobody else gets to and has a rookie first baseman who is learning the position. A solid first baseman makes any infielder better by saving them from throwing errors. I have heard from dozens of scouts/analysts that phillips has the best glove at second base in at least a generation...may be a stretch but easily puts him ahead of 28 other starting 2B...kinsler is the only other with half the range that he has
Posted by: coltholt | August 31, 2008 at 01:18 PM
coltholt I agree with much of you said about Phillips' defense, however Utley has had as many or more balls fielded out of zone as Phillips the past few seasons (OOZ), which suggests that he as at least as good range. His arm is a little shaky at times though and I think Phillips has a little better hands
Posted by: wayne gomes | August 31, 2008 at 01:22 PM
aight...i haven't seen utley play...i can give you that
Posted by: coltholt | August 31, 2008 at 01:24 PM
The only way i would trade Hughes is for Peavy.
I would trade Hughes, Cano, Kennady, and Cervilli for Peavy.
But, I still think the Yankees should give Hughes a Spot in the rotation next year.
For the rotation I would sign either C.C. or Sheets (one of them) then sign Moose or Pettite (sign Moose if they sign C.C. or sign Pettite if they sign Sheets.)
Posted by: yankees2727 | August 31, 2008 at 01:27 PM
My rotation for 2009 would be:
1. C.C.
2. Wang
3. Joba
4. Moose
5. Hughes
or
1. Sheets
2. Wang
3. Joba
4. Pettite
5. Hughes
Posted by: yankees2727 | August 31, 2008 at 01:29 PM
"Seriously? i can think over a handful without even trying...have you ever heard of Brandon Phillips, Chase Utley, Brian Roberts, Ian Kinsler, or Dan Uggla. These guys have all put up better numbers than Cano in his BEST year. Beyond that you have Hudson, Pedroia who are easily as good as Cano."
Phillips: 263 avg, 21 HR, 80 rbi, 308OBP, 736 OPS
Cano: 304 avg, 18 HR, 88 rbi, 337OBP, 809 OPS
Utley: 298 avg, 29 HR, 108rbi, 375OBP, 904 OPS
Roberts: 284 avg, 10 hr, 61 rbi, 355OBP, 772OPS
Kinsler: 290 avg, 23 HR, 82 rbi, 360OBP, 833OPS
Uggla: 262 avg, 32 HR, 94 rbi, 339OBP, 832OPS
Hudson: 282 avg, 13 HR, 70 rbi, 346OBP, 779OPS
Pedroia: 312 avg, 13 HR, 67 rbi, 367OBP, 822OPS
you know the funny thing about those people you mentioned... is that really Cano is the 2nd best avg hitter among them if you look at this, next to Dustin who really only has less then 2 years of service time...
You can make your case of arguement for any of these guys, but the funny thing is, is that Cano is right with everyone with power, rbi's and OBP and OPS, but hits at a higer avg then almost everyone... and he's one of the younger ones of the group... so yes, Cano is one of the best second baseman in the bigs... he also has a 981 Fielding % not bad by any means... 10th in the AL so far with Jason Giambi at first base...
as far as having the money to sign 3 of those 5...
Pavano is 11 mill
Pettite is 16 mill
Abreu is 16 mill
Giambi is 23 mill
Thats 66 mill coming off the books.
CC - 18-20 million
Burnett - 16 mill
Sheets - 16 mill
Tex - 20-25 mill
I think it's definatly doable with all that money coming off the books...
Burnett has an opt out clause in his contact, I highly doubt he doesn't opt out after this year... and i like him more then pettite.. he's younger, and at this point of their careers has better stuff... put him in a rotation with Joba, CC, and Wang barring injury that'd be fierce.
Posted by: casper | August 31, 2008 at 01:30 PM
Pettite does not need to be in pinstripes next year... I think Moose has earned another shot at it, but i keep hughes in the pen just in case... I'd rather pay the same amt of money for Burnett who will be opting out of his contract this year...
Posted by: casper | August 31, 2008 at 01:33 PM
Casper, I'd take anyone on your list over Cano you know what I'd take Polanco too. I know that Cano is a little younger than most of them but I don't see cano as an anchor in a lineup where as most of those guys can anchor a lineup.
Posted by: BucSox | August 31, 2008 at 02:02 PM
How are most of those guys an "anchor" in a lineup???
Uggla, Pedroia and Utley are the only "anchors" that I see there, and Uggla has a Jason Giambi offensive line... Actually Giambi's might be a bit better.. With the exception of Pedroia and Utley for his career Cano is hitting 15 points better then the list, with comparable power numbers.. Phillips and Utley have more homeruns on avg, but Cano knocks more in and hits for a higher average.
Walks are great to have, but i'd rather have someone that gets more hits... Also, tell me which one of those guys has ever had a year where they hit 342 or higher???
Posted by: casper | August 31, 2008 at 02:07 PM
Palanco is a good solid 2b's.. but he's not an "anchor" either... he hits just over 300 with 10hr with 63 rbis a year... He's a good leadoff/#2 hitter... but his overall stats still aren't as good as Robbie's...
Polanco: 306 avg, 10 HR, 63 rbi, 350OBP, 767OPS
Cano: 304 avg, 18 HR, 88 rbi, 337OBP, 809 OPS
They hit for the same avg, but Robbie knocks more out and knocks more in... Palanco is better a little bit defensivly, but then again Cano is still 25... has a lot to go..
Posted by: casper | August 31, 2008 at 02:12 PM
I think the Yanks will keep Moose around to see him get 300 wins. I wonder if he finishes his career off with the yanks and gets in the hall if he will go in as an O or a Yankee.
I think this is going to be an exciting offseason. There seems to be a lot of high profile FA's that don't seem like they're going to resign with their current team and want top market value. Tex, CC, Burnett, Sheets (I could see him resigning more than the others), Manny, K-Rod just off the top of my head.
Posted by: John Difford | August 31, 2008 at 02:15 PM
And if you'd take everyone of of those people over Cano your crazy... and just trying to prove a point.
The only ones I would take is Dustin Pedroia and/or Chase Utley... and while he's had a great year and a half... Pedroia is still not proven yet... he's still not hitting as good as Cano did his first year and a half... but he's damn close.
Posted by: casper | August 31, 2008 at 02:15 PM
why does every yankee writer and every yankee fan think the rest of the majors is their personal farm system? CC has already expressed his lack of interest in playing for the yankees, plus he is house shopping in Southern Cal, so why go to the yankees when he enjoys playing in the NL and on the west coast? and the "how much will it take to get peavy from the padres" remark, is utterly rediculous. peavy is one of the best pitchers in baseball, is signed to an excellent contract, plus he is the face of the padres franchise, but hey lets ship him to the yankees because they need pitching. its rediculous, and it makes me sick.
Posted by: sjdurfey | August 31, 2008 at 02:18 PM
For those of you saying that the Yankees couldn't afford these moves, even if the Yankees signed CC, Teixeira, and Burnett, they'd still have a lower payroll than they did last season.
They're dropping these contracts (maybe more):
Pavano
Mussina
Abreu
Pettitte
Marte
Giambi
Pudge
Farnsworth
Hawkins
They can get CC and Tex at 20 million a piece and still have a much lower payroll. Money won't be a problem since they're dropping ~$85 million.
Posted by: Dynasty | August 31, 2008 at 02:19 PM
1. Hughes will NOT net Votto.
2. Cano will NOT net Matt Cain or Zack Greinke or Chad Billingsley.
3. Hughes, Cano, Kennedy, and Cervielli will NOT net Jake Peavy. Jake Peavy would require a larger package than what the DBacks gave up for Haren.
4.Even if the Yanks sign every FA out there, that doesn't mean they'll be walking away with the 2009 WS ring. It still could be anyone.
5.CC/Sheets/Burnett are not "locks" to come to the Yanks. The Yanks could easily land neither of the three.
Posted by: melonis rex | August 31, 2008 at 02:20 PM
Ok, so Cano is a good 2B. Congrats Yankee fans! Too bad he was unable to "anchor" his team this year. The discussion here was originally centered around cano's trade value. Even Colletti wouldn't trade someone as valuable as Billingsley for a 2B, regardless of whether he is one of the best in the league or not.
Posted by: jacklaf | August 31, 2008 at 02:20 PM
Thank you melonis rex. Finally, a voice of sanity amongst these overzealous Yankee fans!
Posted by: jacklaf | August 31, 2008 at 02:22 PM
"What's with all the "sign Burnett" posts? He is not even a free agent, so obiouvlsy he's with the Jays unless traded" - mike923
mike923, Burnett has the ability to opt out of his contract after this season. Most people believe he will do so to cash in on a very good season.
Posted by: grandmasterb | August 31, 2008 at 02:24 PM
Casper this is the last statement I will make on the issue,
You really don't consider Kinsler an anchor you are crazy.
Also Polanco's avg is still .300. Cano's went down 40 pts/yr for the last 2 years. Cano is heading in the wrong direction that's all I'm sayin I never said he wasn't good.
Posted by: BucSox | August 31, 2008 at 02:24 PM
I agree with most of what you say Melonis.. it's highly likely NY ends up with something that resembles this current rotation next year...
Jack, everyone has bad years... and while he was at the break hitting 220 something, he's not close to 280.. tell me how the other guys that were listed (with Pedroia as the exception) are anchoring their teams??? Hell Utley hasn't done barely anything since the AS break..
And that's the great thing is that anyone can win.. that's why they play the games....
Also, burnett hasn't even had a great year.. his last 2-3 have been better.. I just don't think he wants to play for Toronto anymore, and this is the best age for him to resign with another team.
Posted by: casper | August 31, 2008 at 02:25 PM
sj.. it might make you sick; but... it is what it is..
While I know CC wants to stay on the west coast, I highly doubt he's not in pin stripes next year...
As far as Peavy goes.. Its never rumored but would be an interesting deal I would think... he's got a great contract, but only has another 2 years left on it before he's gone anyways.. so why not maybe trade for a few good young ball players since SD isn't in a position to win for another few years anyway... it would likely take a HUGE deal to get him away from them, but you just never know...
Posted by: casper | August 31, 2008 at 02:25 PM
Ian Kinsler is no more or less of an anchor then Robbie Cano is.. yes his avg has dropped... but again look at his age and servicetime.. the 2nd half the last two years he's burnt it up... That will translate into longterm... just him maturing as a hitter... but I do not think Ian Kinsler is an "anchor".. he's a good ball player, but not an "anchor".
and i meant before he's NOW close to a 280 avg...
Posted by: casper | August 31, 2008 at 02:27 PM
If you want Peavy I'm guessing it would require Cano Jackson and Kennedy or Hughes. I was watching the Padre game the other day and thier GM said something to the effect of someone would have to offer their farm system for them to even pick up the phone.
Posted by: BucSox | August 31, 2008 at 02:33 PM
Kinsler and Cano are the same age they are like 4 months apart.
Posted by: BucSox | August 31, 2008 at 02:36 PM
I would think it'd take as much as Haren.. he was still under team control... peavy at least has a contract that's got 2 years on it... and Haren and Peavy are like pitchers... I see them trading him before his contract is up because I just don't see them contending for another few years...
Posted by: casper | August 31, 2008 at 02:37 PM
Kinslers numbers are going up and Cano's numbers are going down and they are the same age think about it I would like other people's opinion.
Kinsler or Cano?
I know I vote for Kinsler and casper votes for Cano.
Posted by: BucSox | August 31, 2008 at 02:38 PM
I got flagged for spam? lol
Posted by: casper | August 31, 2008 at 02:43 PM
It wouldn't let me post this before, let me try again...
Kinsler is born in June, Robbie in October... so yes you're right.
This is Kinslers break out year.. he never hit until this year... avg 2b servicable offense...
Robbie's numbers are a bit deceiving because the last 2 years in the first half he didn't hit anything... Kinsler barely hit the first 2 full years at all.. and is having a good year this year... but the difference is, is that when Kinsler came up nobody cared because he wasn't hitting.. the pitchers took notice of Robbie (like they do with all great rookie ball players) and have made adjustments the last two years going back and forth with him...
We will see once the pitchers really adjust to Kinsler what happens... Also, while we all know about the short porch in right... Texas is a much better hitters park.. you should hit better out there...
I never said Kinsler was better, but I don't think he's an anchor for a team.. he just doesn't hit enough. Maybe that will change with this year and after.. but it's easy to have a good year when everyone else is worrying about other hitters...
Posted by: casper | August 31, 2008 at 02:44 PM
cano for cain? cano for billingsley? cano for greinke? sherman must be experimenting with LSD. i'm sure each of those teams will give up their young ace pitchers for a guy with a career OBP of 337. snap out of it, sherman.
Posted by: jmurray | August 31, 2008 at 02:48 PM
how about Kennedy for Webb straight up? :)
Posted by: casper | August 31, 2008 at 02:50 PM
I feel that Hughes, Cano, Kennedy + could probably land Peavy. Not that it would ever happen, but that isn't a bad haul. Cano is a very good 2b.
With that said, Pedroia > Cano. Please don't spew the ceiling drivel.
Posted by: Meoveryouok | August 31, 2008 at 03:05 PM
I won't contend that Cano is better or worse then Pedroia... but you can't really do the same.. Look at the production in the first almost 2 years and it's pretty close... but i do like the way Dustin plays the game...
I think Dustin and Robbie are going to be like Jeter and Nomar was for a while.. Jeter won that round... it'll be interesting to see who will win this one.
Posted by: casper | August 31, 2008 at 03:10 PM
does no one listen... cc doesnt like ny, he doesnt want to play in ny
he has been rumored to want sf, but hey wont take him(zito) the angels rnt in a postion to get him, w/ all their players being free(vlad, lackey, krod, tex...) san diego/ oak r rebulidin, and the only 1 left, the dodgers. hell, why not u have cc, penny/lowe, billingsley, kuroda, maddux prob comin back, AND u still have kershaw. also, with one trade and resignin acquisitons (blake, manny) u could have an infield of blake, furcal, uggla(via trade), loney w/ an outfield of manny, kemp, eithier, and hopefully pieere and jones come back. can anyone say 90-100 wins?????????
Posted by: lakersdodgersyankees4life | August 31, 2008 at 03:11 PM
Cano's good but he's not overly cheap. Per Cot's he's due 25Mill over the next 3 years with 2 sizeable options after that which could put him to 27 over the next 3 years if you opt out of his '12 14Mill option.
I'm not sure what type of talent I'd give up to pay Cano 9/yr over the next 3 years but it wouldn't be a #1/#2 type pitcher and especially from teams like SF and SD who will have budget constraints kicking in.
Posted by: tmar | August 31, 2008 at 03:57 PM
Yankee fans/beat writers are idiots.
The Reds are done adding prospects. They need to start adding established veterns.
Posted by: Dave from Louisville | August 31, 2008 at 04:13 PM
Some of your stats were wrong that you posted earlier, especially Roberts'. He's hitting .299 this year, not .284 and his OPS is .843. Give me him over Cano any day.
Posted by: epic | August 31, 2008 at 04:35 PM
CC is not going to be a Yankee. The NL, the west coast, and the negative effect the Yanks have on FA signings, will prevent him from going there.
Posted by: TruDru22 | August 31, 2008 at 05:29 PM
whoever posted Cano's stats is WAY off! The guy is hitting .268 this year with a .308 OBP. And he is not cheap, so he will not net you any of those pitchers. He's not that good. Young cheap pitchers are not going to be traded, sorry. Also, no one is interested in Kennedy or Hughes as top prospects, b/c they aren't anymore.
Posted by: TruDru22 | August 31, 2008 at 05:31 PM
hey casper, why don't you post cano's ACTUAL NUMBERS intead of fantasy ones you wish he had. Also, for Jake Peavy to get traded the'd ask for Joba as a start. They have no reason to trade him with over 2 years left to go. Finally, casper, YOU CAN ONLY SIGN 2 TYPE A FREE AGENTS.....yankees fans are truly clueless, and this year it's more obvious than ever in their misery.
Posted by: TruDru22 | August 31, 2008 at 05:45 PM
"Also, no one is interested in Kennedy or Hughes as top prospects, b/c they aren't anymore."
Hughes sucks because of 3 bad starts? I love people who say this type of crap but know absolutely nothing.
Posted by: hallofamer2000 | August 31, 2008 at 05:46 PM
And also, you're wrong about the number of free agents you can sign.
"Teams are limited to the number of Type A and Type B free agents they can sign, which is determined by the number of free agents available. Example: If there are less than 14 Type A or B free agents, no one team can sign more than one Type A or B free agent. According to Law, last season there were approximately 93 Type A or B free agents, who filed for free agency, which left the per-team quota at eight." This is what MLBTradeRumors posted about what Keith Law said.
You are the clueless one.
Posted by: hallofamer2000 | August 31, 2008 at 05:50 PM
And also, seriously, Cano HAD ONE BAD YEAR. He has hit .300 every season and hit .340. He does not suck.
Players have bad years. It doesn't mean they will always suck.
Posted by: hallofamer2000 | August 31, 2008 at 05:52 PM
but you arent going to trade a guy with his awful numbers this year for anything of significance.......
secondly, hughes and kennedy are injury prone, over hyped prospects.
thirdly, you may sign 2 type As, but there is NO CHANCE there will be enough type a free agents this year to allow you to sign three. It's not going to happen.
Posted by: TruDru22 | August 31, 2008 at 06:00 PM
Ok a few things:
1) The reason Hughes value is so low right now is because of two major injuries over the last 2 years and he took much longer to recover than expect. That's a big red flag no matter how good his stuff is.
2) Cano has great value... but his down year definitely will make teams wary about offering a Cain or Billingsly without getting an insurance prospect. I also think it'd be stupid for the yankees brass to trade him. Also the big issue is his numbers went down after signing his big deal... that's an eyebrow raiser.
3) Someone said it already, pitching really isn't the yankees big issue... defense is. The infield is awful and considered the worst in baseball this year. Jeter and Cano are incredibly overrated defenders (before someone starts yelling at me about Jeter's gold gloves... gold gloves are bs). Add to it you have a slowing Damon in CF with a little girl's arm... at least Melky has a good arm.
4) Dear god in heaven... why exactly do people keep throwing Kennedy in trades as if he's a can't miss prospect. Beginning of last year, he was thought by scouts to have a ceiling of a number 5 pitcher. He throws a couple of good games in the majors and suddenly everyone in New York is saying he's an ace. The guy has a ceiling of a number 5 pitcher and would likely be a solid one in anywhere but the AL East.
5) Yankees are not getting Peavy. Just face it... not happening, no way no how. Peavy is what the Pads have to build around.
6) I don't see the yanks getting CC, he seems to like the west coast and the national league. The Dodgers fit that bill.
Posted by: start_wearing_purple | August 31, 2008 at 06:26 PM
I agree that Cano can't get guys like Cain, etc., but he just does not suck like everyone here suggests.
Kennedy was definitely overrated, but what is there to judge Hughes on? A cup of coffee? His rehab starts? Call him overrated when he was rated the best pitching prospect in baseball after '06 is a joke. HE IS 22 YEARS OLD. 22. Judging him on 3 BAD STARTS and a freak injury is a joke. Are people forgetting he had a 4.40 ERA as a 21 year old in the AL East last year?! Remember the playoffs? Remember his entire minor league track record? If he was still considered a prospect there is no doubt in my mind he would be in the Top 10 still.
Posted by: hallofamer2000 | August 31, 2008 at 06:27 PM
As far am i concerned Sherman is a complete dumbass.
1) The yankees arent trading Cano. The kid is good. I wish Larry Bowa was still with the Yanks. He mentored Cano and ereally helped him during his stay. The yanks are deffinently not trading him.
2)hughes is just 22. He is goin to be a hell of a pitcher they will be retarted if they trade him.
3)Look I understand why people hate Yankee fans. Its cause they think we think we can buy whoever we want and think we will win the World Series every year. Well, I'm NOT that. I agree tha the Yanks wont sign C.C, he'll probably saty in the NL as will Sheets and the Yanks wont get either. I agree in the idea of you cant buy champions and I;ve hated this since the Yankees started.
4) Yankees holes are a reliever, first basemen, and starter. I think they will sign Ohman, Blake (or call Shelley Duncan from AAA), John Garland/ AJ Burnett.
5)The Yankees have a centerfielder, his name is Melky Cabrera. I still think he could be a good hitter. hes only 23. And hes great defender, probably a little better than Victorino.
Posted by: yankfan1 | August 31, 2008 at 06:44 PM
Uhm those stats I posted are career numbers... considering everyone in the aboves list (minus Polanco) are pretty young most in the bigs 5 years or less...
i highly doubt peavy is going anywhere until deadline 2010 or March of 2010... I was just throwing that out there...
Like I said before Kennedy does have good stuff, but I think until he's established himself he has to be in a small market where he can grow. The yanks if they do trade him won't get much for him - and i think when/if he leaves NY it'll be in a trade similar to Jeff karstens.'
Robbie Cano is going nowhere...
Posted by: casper | August 31, 2008 at 06:47 PM
as far as Sabathia goes.. yes he said thats what he prefers... but we all know what players prefer is money. I dont agree with it, but we all know Hank is going to throw a 6-8 year 20+ million a year at him...
Even though in real life you can still buy the same things making 15 mill that you can 23mill, he will still probably take it... If not im fine with Sheets and Burnett..
There will be some of them that are in pinstripes next year..
Posted by: casper | August 31, 2008 at 06:49 PM
This whole thing with Hughes is actually comical to me.. there's a reason why in every trade discussion with NY this year hughes came up...
I wonder why that is...
Posted by: casper | August 31, 2008 at 06:51 PM
People seem to forget that money talks and the yankees are going to offer sabathia the most money so after its all said in done he will be in pinstripes.
Posted by: hebrewhammer1989 | August 31, 2008 at 06:53 PM
Casper and YankFan1, glad to have someone agree with me about Hughes and Cano.
Although YankFan1, I actually believe that Gardner will be the answer in CF that the Yankees are looking for. But Melky still has a chance - even after being demoted to AAA, he's still young for his league. But I do think that Shelley Duncan was just a fluke.
And HebrewHammer summed CC up perfectly.
Posted by: hallofamer2000 | August 31, 2008 at 07:03 PM
the yankees aren't the only team who can offer him that kind of money. the dodgers have a ton coming off and have a ton to spend. and if CC wants a ring, the yankees are not his best chance. just b/c you can't live without a postseason every year doesn't mean you are the only team in baseball to sign free agents.
Posted by: TruDru22 | August 31, 2008 at 07:08 PM
They are saying the Melky is hitting allbeit triple a, but any sign is a good one.. we'll see how he looks when he comes back up...
I think Gardner will patrol CF next year IF they let go of Abreu. Damon does throw like a girl, lol
Posted by: casper | August 31, 2008 at 07:10 PM
Tru - the Dodgers do have a ton coming off... but, the Dodgers are horrible... I mean at least NY is a good team with their injuries...
LA cannot match an offer from NY - bottom line. If he takes less money to play in LA then that'll happen... but to think anyone can spend with NY is just naive. They're going to throw a ton of money at this guy.. and I do think we're going to see him in stripes next year...
Players BS all the time, but money is money... If not, I am glad he's not in the AL :)
Posted by: casper | August 31, 2008 at 07:12 PM
the yankees COULD offer him say 30 million a year for 8 years....but if he wants Johan money, it won't take that much, and I think he'd be satisfied being paid slightly higher the highest paid pitcher ever, which many teams can offer. The Dodgers are competing for the playoffs with a young team and a HOF manager. The Yankees are an old mess right now.
Posted by: TruDru22 | August 31, 2008 at 07:30 PM
oh and many of these teams CAN spend as much as the Yanks, but they actually respect the luxury tax as a guideline, whereas the yankees spit in it's face, and make a mockery of the game in doing so.
Posted by: TruDru22 | August 31, 2008 at 07:35 PM
the Dodgers are a sub 500 team.. the blue jays would be winning that division right now and they're in 4th place... Torre is a great manager even though I never did like his bullpen stratagies..
The Dodgers can't make a 20 mill + offer.. and still have room to resign other players that they need... remember, they still have an injured Schmidt they're paying for... they want to resign Furcal, and Lowe... they have their own needs.. and maybe even Manny.
Maybe your just envious that most other owners make all the money and don't put anyback into their team...
Personally, I don't like them "buying all the free agents", but I am all for them paying a lot of money for players that deserve it.
Posted by: casper | August 31, 2008 at 07:39 PM
C.C. is on record as saying that he wants to play close to home (California) and that he prefers the N.L. where he can swing the bat but Yankee fans don't want to hear that, therefore, they're really not listening. Sure, if the Yankees offer 10 years and $240 million dollars he'd have to take it but I don't think the highest dollar necessarily wins here as long as the second best offer is within reason. If the Yankees go insane with their offer, more power to them, but pitchers and long term contracts carry an inherent risk.
Posted by: MickS | August 31, 2008 at 07:41 PM
the dodgers are a playoff contender and the yankees are a headache. the only thing they have to offer is money, and if they want to have CC, they won't take penny and lowe's options. thus having money.
Posted by: TruDru22 | August 31, 2008 at 07:41 PM
exactly mick......i mean they could offer him an INSANE contract, but that is the only thing they can do to attempt to beat out teams like the dodgers, giants, bosox, mets, etc who can offer giant but still reasonable contracts.
Posted by: TruDru22 | August 31, 2008 at 07:44 PM
but they want Penny and Lowe... They also said they want Furcal, and possibly resign Manny...
MickS - CC said if all were equal he'd rather play in the NL out west... key words equal... Again, im not condoning it, but we all know it's not going to be equal.
The Dodgers are not a playoff contender.. they're in a race right now, but they won't make it and if they do they'll be gone in 3. The only reason why they'd make it in the first place is if because AZ doesn't hit the rest of the year like they haven't been doing since May.
The Dodgers are garbage.. NY is better then they are and 50% of their lineup is injured.
Posted by: casper | August 31, 2008 at 07:45 PM
exactly mick......i mean they could offer him an INSANE contract, but that is the only thing they can do to attempt to beat out teams like the dodgers, giants, bosox, mets, etc who can offer giant but still reasonable contracts.
They're going to offer him an insane contract.. hell, it's already been said they will.. lol... It's a joke. We all know it is... but, they're going to offer him 4-5 mill more a year then anyone else will... im goin to guess around 5 years 23 mill a year... if not 6 years...Even though I hate signing a pitcher that long...
Posted by: casper | August 31, 2008 at 07:48 PM
lol but if they want CC they can afford him casper! they won't want penny and lowe if they can get CC. And the Yankees are not better, and since when does jorge posada count for 50% of your lineup? EVERYONE, including the dodgers, have injuries. Stop the excuses. The yankees had injuries, so they get ponson, marte, nady, pudge, and sexon, and still cant win.
Posted by: TruDru22 | August 31, 2008 at 07:50 PM
lolol 5 years 23? try 7 and 25.
Posted by: TruDru22 | August 31, 2008 at 07:51 PM
so they get ponson, marte, nady, pudge, and sexon
Those guys are as good as: posada, Matsui, Chamberlain, Wang, Hughes, Arod (for a month), Bruney, Pettite missed starts, Damon for another month, jeter even though he played with it.
C'mon, yeah everyone has injuries but you can't say that NY would be sitting like this if they were somewhat healthy.. 5 out of the 6 projected starters this year have missed time with injury. Please tell me 1 other team in this league that has had that. Or have missed their: LF, 3B, and C all whom are all star players at the same time. Give me a break...
We still have a better record the LA! and AZ! And most of the rest of the AL.
Remember CC is only one pitcher. cant replace Lowe and Penny, and he cannot play SS.
How much money is coming off their books? Not all that much.
Posted by: casper | August 31, 2008 at 07:55 PM
They may offer 7/25 - you never know.. I'd be surprised if anyone signs him for 7 years.. I don't think NY will have to. I dont think anyone will give him more then 5 years... and NY will trump that with more money at the same time frame.
Posted by: casper | August 31, 2008 at 07:56 PM
You take away: Shields, Kazmir, Jackson away from Tampa for most of the season... and are they in first place?
How about Beckett, DiceK and Lester... They lost Beckett for 4 starts now just recently, and DiceK for 2 starts with a bum arm...
The only team that can yell about pitching issues is LAA... and they only lost Lackey for around a month.. Escobar was a big hit, but that's 1 player.
No team has been hit like the Yanks with injuries. not to their lineup, and not to their starting rotation...
Current Rotation:
Moose
Pettite
Ponson
Rasner
Pavano --- are you serious?
Posted by: casper | August 31, 2008 at 07:59 PM
how about take away crawford purcival and longoria what would happen then? oh right, they continue to own the AL, as they will for years with young talent.
how about no dice k, beckett, wakefied, papi, and drew! oh right still in 1st in the WC.
how about pedro, el duque, both starting corner outfielders, wagner, sanchez, and castillo? oh right 1st place.
how about orlando hudson, eric byrnes, and justin upton? 1st place.
stop crying your team had magic and it ran out. you can't keep trying to buy it back.
Posted by: TruDru22 | August 31, 2008 at 08:06 PM
Every team has been hit by injuries, sometimes that happens more often to organizations who continue to sign aging veterans
Tampa is getting it done without two stars. Boston has been hit all season by the injury bug. When you start whipping out that excuse think twice before you post it.
Posted by: Meoveryouok | August 31, 2008 at 08:17 PM