![]() |
|
|
| |
« Astros Decline Brocail's Option | Main | Cashman Comments »
Evan Grant of the Dallas Morning News discusses the Rangers' offseason in a new article, focusing on areas other than pitching (which is top priority). We tackled the Rangers here.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e201053511cb89970b
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Rangers Rumors: Blalock, Bradley:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
Wait, fixing the worst rotation in the AL is not a top priority?
Posted by: Meoveryouok | October 01, 2008 at 03:04 PM
What he means is that using the catching surplus in a deal for pitching isnt a priority. It will take more than catching to get pitching so they will focus on what it will take to get what they need.
Posted by: Ace | October 01, 2008 at 03:19 PM
Is it just me, or cant Blalock play 3rd base? He isn't that bad defensively.
Posted by: HypnoToad | October 01, 2008 at 03:23 PM
Blalock's shoulder is the problem. Yeah I meant it the way Ace said it, I wasnt too clear.
Posted by: Tim Dierkes | October 01, 2008 at 03:29 PM
How the heck is Milton Bradley a Type B free agent?
Posted by: icedrake523 | October 01, 2008 at 03:44 PM
There was a report in July that the Rangers would pursue Boof Bonser of the Twins.
Would the Rangers give up Chris Davis for 2 MLB ready starters? Say Boof Bonser plus Phil Humber/Kevin Mulvey?
Posted by: twinsfan | October 01, 2008 at 03:48 PM
"How the heck is Milton Bradley a Type B free agent?"
Are you asking that as "why isn't he Type A" or "why is he rated at all?"
Posted by: AA | October 01, 2008 at 04:14 PM
Tim - could the Rangers exercise Blalock's option, then still turn around and trade him at the winter meetings? I think it's fine idea personally, pending on his value right now.
Here's a thought - If the Yanks don't get Tex or retain Giambi, maybe package Blalock in a deal with a catcher for a young Yankees arm - Ian Kennedy + 1? Blalock looked adequate at 1st, would be cheap compared to the Yanks payroll, and proves to still be (when healthy), a force at the plate.
Posted by: tmoney352 | October 01, 2008 at 04:39 PM
If Bradley is type B it's because his counting stats don't stack up to the other DH's in the American League. He is hurt by the fact that he spent a lot of time last year on the bench where Elias' DL adjustment doesn't help him. I should have all projections finalized within the next couple of weeks. We'll see where he ranks.
Posted by: ebajek85 | October 01, 2008 at 04:46 PM
It might be difficult to get the Yanks to trade for another injury risk after dealing with an injury plagued season like they have had. I think they will stay away from a possible blalock trade and continue on their youth movement.
Posted by: WasianCU | October 01, 2008 at 04:54 PM
Not to say that Blalock is old or washed up or anything like that, just don't think he is something the Yankees will be looking for.
Posted by: WasianCU | October 01, 2008 at 04:55 PM
Did he mention anything about trading Volquez?
Posted by: kgbaseball | October 01, 2008 at 05:34 PM
How about Salty to Washington for Tim Redding? The Bats need more options at 1B and Jesus Flores could use some backup at Catcher. Redding had a great first half in '08 and is under team control for a couple more years.
Posted by: estuartj | October 01, 2008 at 05:48 PM
The Volquez/Hamilton trade really worked out for both teams. Sure, in the end Hamilton slowed down (HR Derby jinx?) and Volquez finished very strong. But overall I still think that in the long run the trade is a wash.
Posted by: Aaron | October 01, 2008 at 05:48 PM
Washington doesn't have the prospects to have any chance at getting Salty. Redding had a career second half and that doesn't qualify him as a top of the rotation starter which is what they could/should receive for trading either Salty or Teagarden.
Posted by: Aaron | October 01, 2008 at 05:49 PM
They have a player named Chris Marrero in the minors, not to mention Nick Johnson and Dmitri Young still in the fold. Why would the Nats need more options at 1B? They need to get rid of one of Johnson or Young before they think about trading for another 1B option.
Posted by: Ink&Paper | October 01, 2008 at 06:02 PM
Two things:
Galarraga was a steal from them. Look how well he did on a dismal pitching staff this year.
Second, what would the Tigers need to give up to get one of these catchers (preferably Salty).
Posted by: TigerFan54 | October 01, 2008 at 06:42 PM
Chris Young, Edison Volquez, Armando Gallaraga.
Gee, I wonder why pitching is top priority.
Posted by: Devlsh | October 01, 2008 at 06:53 PM
"Washington doesn't have the prospects to have any chance at getting Salty. Redding had a career second half and that doesn't qualify him as a top of the rotation starter which is what they could/should receive for trading either Salty or Teagarden."
First, neither of those guys is worth a top of the rotation starter. There are maybe 3 catchers in baseball who are worth that and they are 1) Russel Martin, 2) Brian McCann and 3) a healthy Victor Martinez. I actually think a package built around Redding wouldn't be a bad idea.
That said, the second thing is that catcher is not exactly a priority need for the Nats. Flores showed that he is more than capable of being a front line catcher.
Posted by: AA | October 01, 2008 at 06:56 PM
Jim bowden is on record that the Nats can't go into '09 with Young and Johnson at first base because of their health and injury history. They also can't afford to bring in another player only capable of playing first.
Also, I'm not a fan of only playing your 2nd catcher once a week so bringing in Saltamachia to start at catcher against righties and 1st base against lefties makes sense.
If Redding wonakt do it for TX maybe throwing in Saul Rivera?
Posted by: estuartj | October 01, 2008 at 07:12 PM
If Darren Oliver is a type A free agent. Then Milton Bradley is also!!!
AMEN
Posted by: rangersvoice | October 01, 2008 at 07:22 PM
"First, neither of those guys is worth a top of the rotation starter. There are maybe 3 catchers in baseball who are worth that and they are 1) Russel Martin, 2) Brian McCann and 3) a healthy Victor Martinez. I actually think a package built around Redding wouldn't be a bad idea."
I'd argue five and throw Joe Mauer (the best catcher in baseball) and Geovany Soto into there as well. If Soto proves a little while longer that this isn't a fluke then he is definitely in that same teir of players. And honestly I'd probably throw Matt Wieters in there too, he's practically the most untouchable prospect in baseball.
Posted by: scribbletone | October 01, 2008 at 08:33 PM
How the hell is Mauer NOT #1?
2 batting titles at the age of 25 must mean nothing today. sheesh.
Posted by: twinsfan | October 01, 2008 at 08:37 PM
I don't think the Rangers are looking for a "top of the rotation" starter for Salty, but they can surely get someone better (and younger) than Tim Redding. I actually don't think they'll trade Salty. I think Laird will get dealt for a couple of bullpen arms, and they'll package Blalock and maybe Arias and one of their OFs for a AAA prospect starter. I think they'll sign a bottom of the rotation FA starter, too.
Chris Davis for Bonser & another guy? Seriously? You must not have seen Davis play the 2nd half, twinsfan. He'd cost you Liriano, for sure.
The Texas rotation was awful, but there's some promise there with some of the young kids progressing (Hurley & Harrison), and with Padilla and McCarthy likely to come back strong. It's the bullpen that needs serious help.
By the way Devish - you forgot Danks.
And it wouldn't be too bad to have Doug Davis back, either.
Posted by: J the Dizzolla | October 01, 2008 at 08:49 PM
(Forgive my ignorance.)
Has Salty done anything at the major league level for the Rangers? I haven't followed him since the Braves traded him. He's really worth a front of the rotation guy now?
Posted by: ReardenTech | October 01, 2008 at 09:00 PM
"How the hell is Mauer NOT #1?"
My bad. First, the list was not in any particular order. Second, I totally forgot Mauer. He is absolutely on that list.
Posted by: AA | October 01, 2008 at 09:05 PM
I know all about how much Rangers people like Chris Davis. Do I think he's untouchable? Maybe.
Should he be untouchable, when the Rangers have a great offense without him and pretty weak starting pitching? No.
And would Davis be overvalued if they were asking for Liriano from the Twins? Yes.
I think Davis should be available for a good package like one the Twins could offer. They did so with Garza last year to get a bat, and they might again this winter.
If I were Bill Smith, I'd be willing to trade Perkins, Bonser, and Humber (along with a 1-2 non-pitchers if Texas were looking: Pridie, Buscher, etc.). That would be three starting pitchers (none of which are as good as Liriano, but all of which could start in the MLB). That is a lot of pitchers and a lot of service time for one batter who hasn't played much in the MLB.
Alternately, I'd be willing to trade the best 3B prospect in the Twins minor league system along with Boof, Humber, and Mulvey (or perhaps Boof and Perkins). This would give the Rangers someone to take Blalock's place after next season, or possibly compete for 3B out of spring training, along with some starting pitching, while the Twins get an upgrade at 3B in the lineup and continue to have some decent starters.
Posted by: Brett | October 01, 2008 at 09:07 PM
To the people who think Salty is worth a top of the rotation pitcher - keep in mind that Salty plus several other players was only worth a good first baseman a year ago. Salty has been pretty lousy offensively in the majors, and defense was never a strong point for him. So his value has gone down significantly since then.
On the other hand, Redding has been around for quite a while, and has been terrible most of that time. He's got very little trade value, even if you're talking to a team with pitching as bad as the Rangers.
Davis for Bonser + less player is just silly. Davis put up very impressive numbers in his half season. Although he's too young to give up on, Bonser right now is looking like a 6th starter / long relief kind of guy.
Davis for Liriano is a weird one. I think Davis doesn't have enough time in the majors to consider him a sure thing (see Josh Fields 2007 & 2008 seasons). Post Tommy John surgery Liriano has shown flashes of greatness and also had his share of terrible starts. About the only thing he's proven so far is that his velocity is significantly down from what it used to be. In the end, I think both sides value their player too highly to do the trade straight up. And I think the Twins would be able to get a package of players for him from someone else if were inclined to trade him which would work against a Davis/Liriano swap.
Posted by: yanksfan | October 01, 2008 at 10:48 PM
If I were Kenny Williams, I'd take on Milton Bradley at DH for 3 years.
Posted by: tytomkiel | October 01, 2008 at 11:44 PM
I think the fact that over the last 3 years Bradley has played a total of 283 games might keep him from a long term deal. Or Type A status.
3 years to get 49 HR 166 RBI.
I like how he struke out more then 1/4th of the time too.
Posted by: XD23 | October 02, 2008 at 12:38 AM
I don't think the Rangers should consider trading Chris Davis right now. He's a cheap, young, power-hitting, patient hitter in an offensive ballpark.
That said, Blalock should be traded. not sure of an exact match of the top of my head, but at $6.2M i think you could definitely find a taker.
I think Laird should and will be traded. I would definitely take him on the Red Sox, and I think a good person to be involved in the deal would be Chris Carter. Before you jump on me, I;m not saying as the center-piece, but with another player I think it's a good fit. He has hit tremendously well at AAA for 3 years now, and would be a good LH hitting replacement at DH for Bradley so you can get that draft pick for letting him go, and Carter will be at the league minimum for the next 3 years on his rookie contract, and he's only 25.
Next, I think Teagarden should start next year in AAA and Saltalamacchia should start at catcher in Texas. There are 2 main reasons for this.
1. Saltalamacchia needs a chance to show what he can do playing catcher full-time. Re-evaluate the situation after 2 months.
2. Teagarden did not hit very well in his time at AA or AAA this year, although he hit exceptionally well in Texas. More seasoning can't hurt, make sure he's not put in a situation in which he's set up to fail.
When they re-evaluate the situation after 6-8 weeks in the season, perhaps they both perform well, and Saltalamacchia regains that trade value, while Teagarden proves ready to take over in Texas. Then this surplus becomes a great problem to have.
Next, for 3rd base, I think the Rangers should take a flier on Joe Crede if he can prove his health in the off season. He provides upside to the tune of a .290 AVG, .360 OBP, 25-30 HRs and good defense at 3rd. Worst case, hope Ramon Vasquez can repeat his performance from this year.
Posted by: drchstrpunk | October 02, 2008 at 01:14 AM
There is no way that Crede ever posts a .360 OBP. He would need plate discipline to do that. Maybe you could get a .330 OBP from him but really that's more of his upside.
And can I throw one option out there of adding a quality defensive second baseman with some speed and moving Kinsler to DH. He's worthless as a second baseman and will likely move to the outfield or something soon enough. Or basically when Andrus is ready.
Posted by: scribbletone | October 02, 2008 at 08:37 AM
Hank making 6.2 million this year is at least 4-6 million cheaper than signing a FA 3rd basemen like Crede. 6.2 mil is chump change now a days. They will pick up the option, and if they dont get any good trade offers involving Hank and the winter meetings, he goes into spring training as the 1st baseman if his shoulder isnt good enough to play 3rd. That will allow the team to get production out of him until the trade deadline when they can flip him in a package. I like Hank alot but it would be crazy not to put him in a package to make the team better long term.
Posted by: Ace | October 02, 2008 at 09:18 AM
Tim Redding LOL. Rangers already have two 30+ yo scrubs starting with 5.00 ERA's and 1.50 whips. No thanks.
Posted by: kinsler5 | October 02, 2008 at 11:09 AM
"hey will pick up the option, and if they dont get any good trade offers involving Hank and the winter meetings, he goes into spring training as the 1st baseman if his shoulder isnt good enough to play 3rd."
Chris Davis will be their first baseman, almost assuredly. If Blalock gets any playing time on the Rangers, it'll be at DH and then they decide to move Davis at DH instead.
Posted by: scribbletone | October 02, 2008 at 12:49 PM